Datasets:

subset
stringclasses
6 values
context
stringlengths
16
17.7k
context_tokens
sequence
qid
stringlengths
32
32
question
stringlengths
1
717
question_tokens
sequence
detected_answers
sequence
answers
sequencelengths
1
25
SQuAD
In 1368, a Han Chinese revolt known as the Red Turban Rebellion toppled the Mongol Yuan dynasty in China. Zhu Yuanzhang then established the Ming dynasty, ruling as the Hongwu Emperor (r. 1368–1398). It is not clear how much the early Ming court understood the civil war going on in Tibet between rival religious sects, but the first emperor was anxious to avoid the same trouble that Tibet had caused for the Tang dynasty. Instead of recognizing the Phagmodru ruler, the Hongwu Emperor sided with the Karmapa of the nearer Kham region and southeastern Tibet, sending envoys out in the winter of 1372–1373 to ask the Yuan officeholders to renew their titles for the new Ming court.
{ "tokens": [ "In", "1368", ",", "a", "Han", "Chinese", "revolt", "known", "as", "the", "Red", "Turban", "Rebellion", "toppled", "the", "Mongol", "Yuan", "dynasty", "in", "China", ".", "Zhu", "Yuanzhang", "then", "established", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", ",", "ruling", "as", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1368–1398", ")", ".", "It", "is", "not", "clear", "how", "much", "the", "early", "Ming", "court", "understood", "the", "civil", "war", "going", "on", "in", "Tibet", "between", "rival", "religious", "sects", ",", "but", "the", "first", "emperor", "was", "anxious", "to", "avoid", "the", "same", "trouble", "that", "Tibet", "had", "caused", "for", "the", "Tang", "dynasty", ".", "Instead", "of", "recognizing", "the", "Phagmodru", "ruler", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "sided", "with", "the", "Karmapa", "of", "the", "nearer", "Kham", "region", "and", "southeastern", "Tibet", ",", "sending", "envoys", "out", "in", "the", "winter", "of", "1372–1373", "to", "ask", "the", "Yuan", "officeholders", "to", "renew", "their", "titles", "for", "the", "new", "Ming", "court", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 7, 9, 11, 15, 23, 30, 36, 39, 43, 47, 54, 64, 72, 76, 83, 88, 96, 99, 104, 106, 110, 120, 125, 137, 141, 146, 153, 155, 162, 165, 169, 176, 184, 185, 188, 197, 198, 200, 203, 206, 210, 216, 220, 225, 229, 235, 240, 246, 257, 261, 267, 271, 277, 280, 283, 289, 297, 303, 313, 318, 320, 324, 328, 334, 342, 346, 354, 357, 363, 367, 372, 380, 385, 391, 395, 402, 406, 410, 415, 422, 424, 432, 435, 447, 451, 461, 466, 468, 472, 479, 487, 493, 498, 502, 510, 513, 517, 524, 529, 536, 540, 553, 558, 560, 568, 575, 579, 582, 586, 593, 596, 606, 609, 613, 617, 622, 636, 639, 645, 651, 658, 662, 666, 670, 675, 680 ] }
abe3551532324d7dbbc24bbf7905025d
What years did Zhu Yuanzhang rule as the Hongwu Emperor?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "years", "did", "Zhu", "Yuanzhang", "rule", "as", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 11, 15, 19, 29, 34, 37, 41, 48, 55 ] }
{ "text": [ "1368–1398" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 188 ], "end": [ 196 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 36 ], "end": [ 36 ] } ] }
[ "1368–1398" ]
SQuAD
In 1368, a Han Chinese revolt known as the Red Turban Rebellion toppled the Mongol Yuan dynasty in China. Zhu Yuanzhang then established the Ming dynasty, ruling as the Hongwu Emperor (r. 1368–1398). It is not clear how much the early Ming court understood the civil war going on in Tibet between rival religious sects, but the first emperor was anxious to avoid the same trouble that Tibet had caused for the Tang dynasty. Instead of recognizing the Phagmodru ruler, the Hongwu Emperor sided with the Karmapa of the nearer Kham region and southeastern Tibet, sending envoys out in the winter of 1372–1373 to ask the Yuan officeholders to renew their titles for the new Ming court.
{ "tokens": [ "In", "1368", ",", "a", "Han", "Chinese", "revolt", "known", "as", "the", "Red", "Turban", "Rebellion", "toppled", "the", "Mongol", "Yuan", "dynasty", "in", "China", ".", "Zhu", "Yuanzhang", "then", "established", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", ",", "ruling", "as", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1368–1398", ")", ".", "It", "is", "not", "clear", "how", "much", "the", "early", "Ming", "court", "understood", "the", "civil", "war", "going", "on", "in", "Tibet", "between", "rival", "religious", "sects", ",", "but", "the", "first", "emperor", "was", "anxious", "to", "avoid", "the", "same", "trouble", "that", "Tibet", "had", "caused", "for", "the", "Tang", "dynasty", ".", "Instead", "of", "recognizing", "the", "Phagmodru", "ruler", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "sided", "with", "the", "Karmapa", "of", "the", "nearer", "Kham", "region", "and", "southeastern", "Tibet", ",", "sending", "envoys", "out", "in", "the", "winter", "of", "1372–1373", "to", "ask", "the", "Yuan", "officeholders", "to", "renew", "their", "titles", "for", "the", "new", "Ming", "court", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 7, 9, 11, 15, 23, 30, 36, 39, 43, 47, 54, 64, 72, 76, 83, 88, 96, 99, 104, 106, 110, 120, 125, 137, 141, 146, 153, 155, 162, 165, 169, 176, 184, 185, 188, 197, 198, 200, 203, 206, 210, 216, 220, 225, 229, 235, 240, 246, 257, 261, 267, 271, 277, 280, 283, 289, 297, 303, 313, 318, 320, 324, 328, 334, 342, 346, 354, 357, 363, 367, 372, 380, 385, 391, 395, 402, 406, 410, 415, 422, 424, 432, 435, 447, 451, 461, 466, 468, 472, 479, 487, 493, 498, 502, 510, 513, 517, 524, 529, 536, 540, 553, 558, 560, 568, 575, 579, 582, 586, 593, 596, 606, 609, 613, 617, 622, 636, 639, 645, 651, 658, 662, 666, 670, 675, 680 ] }
7cebb4b7b1984397a157708546dc0446
Who did the Hongwu Emperor send convoys to?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "did", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "send", "convoys", "to", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 19, 27, 32, 40, 42 ] }
{ "text": [ "Yuan officeholders" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 617 ], "end": [ 634 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 116 ], "end": [ 117 ] } ] }
[ "Yuan officeholders" ]
SQuAD
Laird writes that the Ming appointed titles to eastern Tibetan princes, and that "these alliances with eastern Tibetan principalities are the evidence China now produces for its assertion that the Ming ruled Tibet," despite the fact that the Ming did not send an army to replace the Mongols after they left Tibet. Yiu Yung-chin states that the furthest western extent of the Ming dynasty's territory was Gansu, Sichuan, and Yunnan while "the Ming did not possess Tibet."
{ "tokens": [ "Laird", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "appointed", "titles", "to", "eastern", "Tibetan", "princes", ",", "and", "that", "\"", "these", "alliances", "with", "eastern", "Tibetan", "principalities", "are", "the", "evidence", "China", "now", "produces", "for", "its", "assertion", "that", "the", "Ming", "ruled", "Tibet", ",", "\"", "despite", "the", "fact", "that", "the", "Ming", "did", "not", "send", "an", "army", "to", "replace", "the", "Mongols", "after", "they", "left", "Tibet", ".", "Yiu", "Yung", "-", "chin", "states", "that", "the", "furthest", "western", "extent", "of", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "'s", "territory", "was", "Gansu", ",", "Sichuan", ",", "and", "Yunnan", "while", "\"", "the", "Ming", "did", "not", "possess", "Tibet", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 13, 18, 22, 27, 37, 44, 47, 55, 63, 70, 72, 76, 81, 82, 88, 98, 103, 111, 119, 134, 138, 142, 151, 157, 161, 170, 174, 178, 188, 193, 197, 202, 208, 213, 214, 216, 224, 228, 233, 238, 242, 247, 251, 255, 260, 263, 268, 271, 279, 283, 291, 297, 302, 307, 312, 314, 318, 322, 323, 328, 335, 340, 344, 353, 361, 368, 371, 375, 380, 387, 390, 400, 404, 409, 411, 418, 420, 424, 431, 437, 438, 442, 447, 451, 455, 463, 468, 469 ] }
fc3e8673bde14d63b5fb42106bdc4fa7
Who did the Ming appoint titles to?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "did", "the", "Ming", "appoint", "titles", "to", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 17, 25, 32, 34 ] }
{ "text": [ "eastern Tibetan princes" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 47 ], "end": [ 69 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 8 ], "end": [ 10 ] } ] }
[ "eastern Tibetan princes" ]
SQuAD
Laird writes that the Ming appointed titles to eastern Tibetan princes, and that "these alliances with eastern Tibetan principalities are the evidence China now produces for its assertion that the Ming ruled Tibet," despite the fact that the Ming did not send an army to replace the Mongols after they left Tibet. Yiu Yung-chin states that the furthest western extent of the Ming dynasty's territory was Gansu, Sichuan, and Yunnan while "the Ming did not possess Tibet."
{ "tokens": [ "Laird", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "appointed", "titles", "to", "eastern", "Tibetan", "princes", ",", "and", "that", "\"", "these", "alliances", "with", "eastern", "Tibetan", "principalities", "are", "the", "evidence", "China", "now", "produces", "for", "its", "assertion", "that", "the", "Ming", "ruled", "Tibet", ",", "\"", "despite", "the", "fact", "that", "the", "Ming", "did", "not", "send", "an", "army", "to", "replace", "the", "Mongols", "after", "they", "left", "Tibet", ".", "Yiu", "Yung", "-", "chin", "states", "that", "the", "furthest", "western", "extent", "of", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "'s", "territory", "was", "Gansu", ",", "Sichuan", ",", "and", "Yunnan", "while", "\"", "the", "Ming", "did", "not", "possess", "Tibet", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 13, 18, 22, 27, 37, 44, 47, 55, 63, 70, 72, 76, 81, 82, 88, 98, 103, 111, 119, 134, 138, 142, 151, 157, 161, 170, 174, 178, 188, 193, 197, 202, 208, 213, 214, 216, 224, 228, 233, 238, 242, 247, 251, 255, 260, 263, 268, 271, 279, 283, 291, 297, 302, 307, 312, 314, 318, 322, 323, 328, 335, 340, 344, 353, 361, 368, 371, 375, 380, 387, 390, 400, 404, 409, 411, 418, 420, 424, 431, 437, 438, 442, 447, 451, 455, 463, 468, 469 ] }
8c46649348de4b7f9ab11cc093bf54fa
What didn't the Ming send to replace the Mongols when they left Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "did", "n't", "the", "Ming", "send", "to", "replace", "the", "Mongols", "when", "they", "left", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 8, 12, 16, 21, 26, 29, 37, 41, 49, 54, 59, 64, 69 ] }
{ "text": [ "an army" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 260 ], "end": [ 266 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 46 ], "end": [ 47 ] } ] }
[ "an army" ]
SQuAD
According to Tibetologist John Powers, Tibetan sources counter this narrative of titles granted by the Chinese to Tibetans with various titles which the Tibetans gave to the Chinese emperors and their officials. Tribute missions from Tibetan monasteries to the Chinese court brought back not only titles, but large, commercially valuable gifts which could subsequently be sold. The Ming emperors sent invitations to ruling lamas, but the lamas sent subordinates rather than coming themselves, and no Tibetan ruler ever explicitly accepted the role of being a vassal of the Ming.
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "Tibetologist", "John", "Powers", ",", "Tibetan", "sources", "counter", "this", "narrative", "of", "titles", "granted", "by", "the", "Chinese", "to", "Tibetans", "with", "various", "titles", "which", "the", "Tibetans", "gave", "to", "the", "Chinese", "emperors", "and", "their", "officials", ".", "Tribute", "missions", "from", "Tibetan", "monasteries", "to", "the", "Chinese", "court", "brought", "back", "not", "only", "titles", ",", "but", "large", ",", "commercially", "valuable", "gifts", "which", "could", "subsequently", "be", "sold", ".", "The", "Ming", "emperors", "sent", "invitations", "to", "ruling", "lamas", ",", "but", "the", "lamas", "sent", "subordinates", "rather", "than", "coming", "themselves", ",", "and", "no", "Tibetan", "ruler", "ever", "explicitly", "accepted", "the", "role", "of", "being", "a", "vassal", "of", "the", "Ming", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 26, 31, 37, 39, 47, 55, 63, 68, 78, 81, 88, 96, 99, 103, 111, 114, 123, 128, 136, 143, 149, 153, 162, 167, 170, 174, 182, 191, 195, 201, 210, 212, 220, 229, 234, 242, 254, 257, 261, 269, 275, 283, 288, 292, 297, 303, 305, 309, 314, 316, 329, 338, 344, 350, 356, 369, 372, 376, 378, 382, 387, 396, 401, 413, 416, 423, 428, 430, 434, 438, 444, 449, 462, 469, 474, 481, 491, 493, 497, 500, 508, 514, 519, 530, 539, 543, 548, 551, 557, 559, 566, 569, 573, 577 ] }
60ebeaf6503c4f369ee24c402975134d
What was the name of the Tibetologist?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "was", "the", "name", "of", "the", "Tibetologist", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 13, 18, 21, 25, 37 ] }
{ "text": [ "John Powers" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 26 ], "end": [ 36 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 3 ], "end": [ 4 ] } ] }
[ "John Powers" ]
SQuAD
According to Tibetologist John Powers, Tibetan sources counter this narrative of titles granted by the Chinese to Tibetans with various titles which the Tibetans gave to the Chinese emperors and their officials. Tribute missions from Tibetan monasteries to the Chinese court brought back not only titles, but large, commercially valuable gifts which could subsequently be sold. The Ming emperors sent invitations to ruling lamas, but the lamas sent subordinates rather than coming themselves, and no Tibetan ruler ever explicitly accepted the role of being a vassal of the Ming.
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "Tibetologist", "John", "Powers", ",", "Tibetan", "sources", "counter", "this", "narrative", "of", "titles", "granted", "by", "the", "Chinese", "to", "Tibetans", "with", "various", "titles", "which", "the", "Tibetans", "gave", "to", "the", "Chinese", "emperors", "and", "their", "officials", ".", "Tribute", "missions", "from", "Tibetan", "monasteries", "to", "the", "Chinese", "court", "brought", "back", "not", "only", "titles", ",", "but", "large", ",", "commercially", "valuable", "gifts", "which", "could", "subsequently", "be", "sold", ".", "The", "Ming", "emperors", "sent", "invitations", "to", "ruling", "lamas", ",", "but", "the", "lamas", "sent", "subordinates", "rather", "than", "coming", "themselves", ",", "and", "no", "Tibetan", "ruler", "ever", "explicitly", "accepted", "the", "role", "of", "being", "a", "vassal", "of", "the", "Ming", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 26, 31, 37, 39, 47, 55, 63, 68, 78, 81, 88, 96, 99, 103, 111, 114, 123, 128, 136, 143, 149, 153, 162, 167, 170, 174, 182, 191, 195, 201, 210, 212, 220, 229, 234, 242, 254, 257, 261, 269, 275, 283, 288, 292, 297, 303, 305, 309, 314, 316, 329, 338, 344, 350, 356, 369, 372, 376, 378, 382, 387, 396, 401, 413, 416, 423, 428, 430, 434, 438, 444, 449, 462, 469, 474, 481, 491, 493, 497, 500, 508, 514, 519, 530, 539, 543, 548, 551, 557, 559, 566, 569, 573, 577 ] }
3ab67723209544a8bb7a03d16e0bdd52
Who did the Ming emperors send invitations to?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "did", "the", "Ming", "emperors", "send", "invitations", "to", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 17, 26, 31, 43, 45 ] }
{ "text": [ "ruling lamas" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 416 ], "end": [ 427 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 67 ], "end": [ 68 ] } ] }
[ "ruling lamas" ]
SQuAD
According to Tibetologist John Powers, Tibetan sources counter this narrative of titles granted by the Chinese to Tibetans with various titles which the Tibetans gave to the Chinese emperors and their officials. Tribute missions from Tibetan monasteries to the Chinese court brought back not only titles, but large, commercially valuable gifts which could subsequently be sold. The Ming emperors sent invitations to ruling lamas, but the lamas sent subordinates rather than coming themselves, and no Tibetan ruler ever explicitly accepted the role of being a vassal of the Ming.
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "Tibetologist", "John", "Powers", ",", "Tibetan", "sources", "counter", "this", "narrative", "of", "titles", "granted", "by", "the", "Chinese", "to", "Tibetans", "with", "various", "titles", "which", "the", "Tibetans", "gave", "to", "the", "Chinese", "emperors", "and", "their", "officials", ".", "Tribute", "missions", "from", "Tibetan", "monasteries", "to", "the", "Chinese", "court", "brought", "back", "not", "only", "titles", ",", "but", "large", ",", "commercially", "valuable", "gifts", "which", "could", "subsequently", "be", "sold", ".", "The", "Ming", "emperors", "sent", "invitations", "to", "ruling", "lamas", ",", "but", "the", "lamas", "sent", "subordinates", "rather", "than", "coming", "themselves", ",", "and", "no", "Tibetan", "ruler", "ever", "explicitly", "accepted", "the", "role", "of", "being", "a", "vassal", "of", "the", "Ming", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 26, 31, 37, 39, 47, 55, 63, 68, 78, 81, 88, 96, 99, 103, 111, 114, 123, 128, 136, 143, 149, 153, 162, 167, 170, 174, 182, 191, 195, 201, 210, 212, 220, 229, 234, 242, 254, 257, 261, 269, 275, 283, 288, 292, 297, 303, 305, 309, 314, 316, 329, 338, 344, 350, 356, 369, 372, 376, 378, 382, 387, 396, 401, 413, 416, 423, 428, 430, 434, 438, 444, 449, 462, 469, 474, 481, 491, 493, 497, 500, 508, 514, 519, 530, 539, 543, 548, 551, 557, 559, 566, 569, 573, 577 ] }
998b72ce0ab44b418cf76e887972b3b2
When the lamas received an invite from the emperors, who did they send instead?
{ "tokens": [ "When", "the", "lamas", "received", "an", "invite", "from", "the", "emperors", ",", "who", "did", "they", "send", "instead", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 15, 24, 27, 34, 39, 43, 51, 53, 57, 61, 66, 71, 78 ] }
{ "text": [ "subordinates" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 449 ], "end": [ 460 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 74 ], "end": [ 74 ] } ] }
[ "subordinates" ]
SQuAD
Kublai Khan did not conquer the Song dynasty in South China until 1279, so Tibet was a component of the early Mongol Empire before it was combined into one of its descendant empires with the whole of China under the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368). Van Praag writes that this conquest "marked the end of independent China," which was then incorporated into the Yuan dynasty that ruled China, Tibet, Mongolia, Korea, parts of Siberia and Upper Burma. Morris Rossabi, a professor of Asian history at Queens College, City University of New York, writes that "Khubilai wished to be perceived both as the legitimate Khan of Khans of the Mongols and as the Emperor of China. Though he had, by the early 1260s, become closely identified with China, he still, for a time, claimed universal rule", and yet "despite his successes in China and Korea, Khubilai was unable to have himself accepted as the Great Khan". Thus, with such limited acceptance of his position as Great Khan, Kublai Khan increasingly became identified with China and sought support as Emperor of China.
{ "tokens": [ "Kublai", "Khan", "did", "not", "conquer", "the", "Song", "dynasty", "in", "South", "China", "until", "1279", ",", "so", "Tibet", "was", "a", "component", "of", "the", "early", "Mongol", "Empire", "before", "it", "was", "combined", "into", "one", "of", "its", "descendant", "empires", "with", "the", "whole", "of", "China", "under", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "(", "1271–1368", ")", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "this", "conquest", "\"", "marked", "the", "end", "of", "independent", "China", ",", "\"", "which", "was", "then", "incorporated", "into", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "that", "ruled", "China", ",", "Tibet", ",", "Mongolia", ",", "Korea", ",", "parts", "of", "Siberia", "and", "Upper", "Burma", ".", "Morris", "Rossabi", ",", "a", "professor", "of", "Asian", "history", "at", "Queens", "College", ",", "City", "University", "of", "New", "York", ",", "writes", "that", "\"", "Khubilai", "wished", "to", "be", "perceived", "both", "as", "the", "legitimate", "Khan", "of", "Khans", "of", "the", "Mongols", "and", "as", "the", "Emperor", "of", "China", ".", "Though", "he", "had", ",", "by", "the", "early", "1260s", ",", "become", "closely", "identified", "with", "China", ",", "he", "still", ",", "for", "a", "time", ",", "claimed", "universal", "rule", "\"", ",", "and", "yet", "\"", "despite", "his", "successes", "in", "China", "and", "Korea", ",", "Khubilai", "was", "unable", "to", "have", "himself", "accepted", "as", "the", "Great", "Khan", "\"", ".", "Thus", ",", "with", "such", "limited", "acceptance", "of", "his", "position", "as", "Great", "Khan", ",", "Kublai", "Khan", "increasingly", "became", "identified", "with", "China", "and", "sought", "support", "as", "Emperor", "of", "China", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 12, 16, 20, 28, 32, 37, 45, 48, 54, 60, 66, 70, 72, 75, 81, 85, 87, 97, 100, 104, 110, 117, 124, 131, 134, 138, 147, 152, 156, 159, 163, 174, 182, 187, 191, 197, 200, 206, 212, 216, 221, 229, 230, 239, 240, 242, 246, 252, 259, 264, 269, 278, 279, 286, 290, 294, 297, 309, 314, 315, 317, 323, 327, 332, 345, 350, 354, 359, 367, 372, 378, 383, 385, 390, 392, 400, 402, 407, 409, 415, 418, 426, 430, 436, 441, 443, 450, 457, 459, 461, 471, 474, 480, 488, 491, 498, 505, 507, 512, 523, 526, 530, 534, 536, 543, 548, 549, 558, 565, 568, 571, 581, 586, 589, 593, 604, 609, 612, 618, 621, 625, 633, 637, 640, 644, 652, 655, 660, 662, 669, 672, 675, 677, 680, 684, 690, 695, 697, 704, 712, 723, 728, 733, 735, 738, 743, 745, 749, 751, 755, 757, 765, 775, 779, 780, 782, 786, 790, 791, 799, 803, 813, 816, 822, 826, 831, 833, 842, 846, 853, 856, 861, 869, 878, 881, 885, 891, 895, 896, 898, 902, 904, 909, 914, 922, 933, 936, 940, 949, 952, 958, 962, 964, 971, 976, 989, 996, 1007, 1012, 1018, 1022, 1029, 1037, 1040, 1048, 1051, 1056 ] }
cc30d6b332c646768323c0d7554107bd
When did Kublai Khan conquer the song dynasty?
{ "tokens": [ "When", "did", "Kublai", "Khan", "conquer", "the", "song", "dynasty", "?", " " ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 16, 21, 29, 33, 38, 45, 47 ] }
{ "text": [ "1279" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 66 ], "end": [ 69 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 12 ], "end": [ 12 ] } ] }
[ "1279" ]
SQuAD
Kublai Khan did not conquer the Song dynasty in South China until 1279, so Tibet was a component of the early Mongol Empire before it was combined into one of its descendant empires with the whole of China under the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368). Van Praag writes that this conquest "marked the end of independent China," which was then incorporated into the Yuan dynasty that ruled China, Tibet, Mongolia, Korea, parts of Siberia and Upper Burma. Morris Rossabi, a professor of Asian history at Queens College, City University of New York, writes that "Khubilai wished to be perceived both as the legitimate Khan of Khans of the Mongols and as the Emperor of China. Though he had, by the early 1260s, become closely identified with China, he still, for a time, claimed universal rule", and yet "despite his successes in China and Korea, Khubilai was unable to have himself accepted as the Great Khan". Thus, with such limited acceptance of his position as Great Khan, Kublai Khan increasingly became identified with China and sought support as Emperor of China.
{ "tokens": [ "Kublai", "Khan", "did", "not", "conquer", "the", "Song", "dynasty", "in", "South", "China", "until", "1279", ",", "so", "Tibet", "was", "a", "component", "of", "the", "early", "Mongol", "Empire", "before", "it", "was", "combined", "into", "one", "of", "its", "descendant", "empires", "with", "the", "whole", "of", "China", "under", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "(", "1271–1368", ")", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "this", "conquest", "\"", "marked", "the", "end", "of", "independent", "China", ",", "\"", "which", "was", "then", "incorporated", "into", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "that", "ruled", "China", ",", "Tibet", ",", "Mongolia", ",", "Korea", ",", "parts", "of", "Siberia", "and", "Upper", "Burma", ".", "Morris", "Rossabi", ",", "a", "professor", "of", "Asian", "history", "at", "Queens", "College", ",", "City", "University", "of", "New", "York", ",", "writes", "that", "\"", "Khubilai", "wished", "to", "be", "perceived", "both", "as", "the", "legitimate", "Khan", "of", "Khans", "of", "the", "Mongols", "and", "as", "the", "Emperor", "of", "China", ".", "Though", "he", "had", ",", "by", "the", "early", "1260s", ",", "become", "closely", "identified", "with", "China", ",", "he", "still", ",", "for", "a", "time", ",", "claimed", "universal", "rule", "\"", ",", "and", "yet", "\"", "despite", "his", "successes", "in", "China", "and", "Korea", ",", "Khubilai", "was", "unable", "to", "have", "himself", "accepted", "as", "the", "Great", "Khan", "\"", ".", "Thus", ",", "with", "such", "limited", "acceptance", "of", "his", "position", "as", "Great", "Khan", ",", "Kublai", "Khan", "increasingly", "became", "identified", "with", "China", "and", "sought", "support", "as", "Emperor", "of", "China", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 12, 16, 20, 28, 32, 37, 45, 48, 54, 60, 66, 70, 72, 75, 81, 85, 87, 97, 100, 104, 110, 117, 124, 131, 134, 138, 147, 152, 156, 159, 163, 174, 182, 187, 191, 197, 200, 206, 212, 216, 221, 229, 230, 239, 240, 242, 246, 252, 259, 264, 269, 278, 279, 286, 290, 294, 297, 309, 314, 315, 317, 323, 327, 332, 345, 350, 354, 359, 367, 372, 378, 383, 385, 390, 392, 400, 402, 407, 409, 415, 418, 426, 430, 436, 441, 443, 450, 457, 459, 461, 471, 474, 480, 488, 491, 498, 505, 507, 512, 523, 526, 530, 534, 536, 543, 548, 549, 558, 565, 568, 571, 581, 586, 589, 593, 604, 609, 612, 618, 621, 625, 633, 637, 640, 644, 652, 655, 660, 662, 669, 672, 675, 677, 680, 684, 690, 695, 697, 704, 712, 723, 728, 733, 735, 738, 743, 745, 749, 751, 755, 757, 765, 775, 779, 780, 782, 786, 790, 791, 799, 803, 813, 816, 822, 826, 831, 833, 842, 846, 853, 856, 861, 869, 878, 881, 885, 891, 895, 896, 898, 902, 904, 909, 914, 922, 933, 936, 940, 949, 952, 958, 962, 964, 971, 976, 989, 996, 1007, 1012, 1018, 1022, 1029, 1037, 1040, 1048, 1051, 1056 ] }
9299bb7313294e788053ad117d0ce165
When did the Yuan dynasty rule?
{ "tokens": [ "When", "did", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "rule", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 13, 18, 26, 30 ] }
{ "text": [ "1271–1368" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 230 ], "end": [ 238 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 44 ], "end": [ 44 ] } ] }
[ "1271–1368" ]
SQuAD
Kublai Khan did not conquer the Song dynasty in South China until 1279, so Tibet was a component of the early Mongol Empire before it was combined into one of its descendant empires with the whole of China under the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368). Van Praag writes that this conquest "marked the end of independent China," which was then incorporated into the Yuan dynasty that ruled China, Tibet, Mongolia, Korea, parts of Siberia and Upper Burma. Morris Rossabi, a professor of Asian history at Queens College, City University of New York, writes that "Khubilai wished to be perceived both as the legitimate Khan of Khans of the Mongols and as the Emperor of China. Though he had, by the early 1260s, become closely identified with China, he still, for a time, claimed universal rule", and yet "despite his successes in China and Korea, Khubilai was unable to have himself accepted as the Great Khan". Thus, with such limited acceptance of his position as Great Khan, Kublai Khan increasingly became identified with China and sought support as Emperor of China.
{ "tokens": [ "Kublai", "Khan", "did", "not", "conquer", "the", "Song", "dynasty", "in", "South", "China", "until", "1279", ",", "so", "Tibet", "was", "a", "component", "of", "the", "early", "Mongol", "Empire", "before", "it", "was", "combined", "into", "one", "of", "its", "descendant", "empires", "with", "the", "whole", "of", "China", "under", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "(", "1271–1368", ")", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "this", "conquest", "\"", "marked", "the", "end", "of", "independent", "China", ",", "\"", "which", "was", "then", "incorporated", "into", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "that", "ruled", "China", ",", "Tibet", ",", "Mongolia", ",", "Korea", ",", "parts", "of", "Siberia", "and", "Upper", "Burma", ".", "Morris", "Rossabi", ",", "a", "professor", "of", "Asian", "history", "at", "Queens", "College", ",", "City", "University", "of", "New", "York", ",", "writes", "that", "\"", "Khubilai", "wished", "to", "be", "perceived", "both", "as", "the", "legitimate", "Khan", "of", "Khans", "of", "the", "Mongols", "and", "as", "the", "Emperor", "of", "China", ".", "Though", "he", "had", ",", "by", "the", "early", "1260s", ",", "become", "closely", "identified", "with", "China", ",", "he", "still", ",", "for", "a", "time", ",", "claimed", "universal", "rule", "\"", ",", "and", "yet", "\"", "despite", "his", "successes", "in", "China", "and", "Korea", ",", "Khubilai", "was", "unable", "to", "have", "himself", "accepted", "as", "the", "Great", "Khan", "\"", ".", "Thus", ",", "with", "such", "limited", "acceptance", "of", "his", "position", "as", "Great", "Khan", ",", "Kublai", "Khan", "increasingly", "became", "identified", "with", "China", "and", "sought", "support", "as", "Emperor", "of", "China", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 12, 16, 20, 28, 32, 37, 45, 48, 54, 60, 66, 70, 72, 75, 81, 85, 87, 97, 100, 104, 110, 117, 124, 131, 134, 138, 147, 152, 156, 159, 163, 174, 182, 187, 191, 197, 200, 206, 212, 216, 221, 229, 230, 239, 240, 242, 246, 252, 259, 264, 269, 278, 279, 286, 290, 294, 297, 309, 314, 315, 317, 323, 327, 332, 345, 350, 354, 359, 367, 372, 378, 383, 385, 390, 392, 400, 402, 407, 409, 415, 418, 426, 430, 436, 441, 443, 450, 457, 459, 461, 471, 474, 480, 488, 491, 498, 505, 507, 512, 523, 526, 530, 534, 536, 543, 548, 549, 558, 565, 568, 571, 581, 586, 589, 593, 604, 609, 612, 618, 621, 625, 633, 637, 640, 644, 652, 655, 660, 662, 669, 672, 675, 677, 680, 684, 690, 695, 697, 704, 712, 723, 728, 733, 735, 738, 743, 745, 749, 751, 755, 757, 765, 775, 779, 780, 782, 786, 790, 791, 799, 803, 813, 816, 822, 826, 831, 833, 842, 846, 853, 856, 861, 869, 878, 881, 885, 891, 895, 896, 898, 902, 904, 909, 914, 922, 933, 936, 940, 949, 952, 958, 962, 964, 971, 976, 989, 996, 1007, 1012, 1018, 1022, 1029, 1037, 1040, 1048, 1051, 1056 ] }
7cd7fe452edc48fa81465ced611d4ca4
Which dynasty ruled all of china?
{ "tokens": [ "Which", "dynasty", "ruled", "all", "of", "china", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 14, 20, 24, 27, 32 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Yuan dynasty" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 212 ], "end": [ 227 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 40 ], "end": [ 42 ] } ] }
[ "the Yuan dynasty" ]
SQuAD
Kublai Khan did not conquer the Song dynasty in South China until 1279, so Tibet was a component of the early Mongol Empire before it was combined into one of its descendant empires with the whole of China under the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368). Van Praag writes that this conquest "marked the end of independent China," which was then incorporated into the Yuan dynasty that ruled China, Tibet, Mongolia, Korea, parts of Siberia and Upper Burma. Morris Rossabi, a professor of Asian history at Queens College, City University of New York, writes that "Khubilai wished to be perceived both as the legitimate Khan of Khans of the Mongols and as the Emperor of China. Though he had, by the early 1260s, become closely identified with China, he still, for a time, claimed universal rule", and yet "despite his successes in China and Korea, Khubilai was unable to have himself accepted as the Great Khan". Thus, with such limited acceptance of his position as Great Khan, Kublai Khan increasingly became identified with China and sought support as Emperor of China.
{ "tokens": [ "Kublai", "Khan", "did", "not", "conquer", "the", "Song", "dynasty", "in", "South", "China", "until", "1279", ",", "so", "Tibet", "was", "a", "component", "of", "the", "early", "Mongol", "Empire", "before", "it", "was", "combined", "into", "one", "of", "its", "descendant", "empires", "with", "the", "whole", "of", "China", "under", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "(", "1271–1368", ")", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "this", "conquest", "\"", "marked", "the", "end", "of", "independent", "China", ",", "\"", "which", "was", "then", "incorporated", "into", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "that", "ruled", "China", ",", "Tibet", ",", "Mongolia", ",", "Korea", ",", "parts", "of", "Siberia", "and", "Upper", "Burma", ".", "Morris", "Rossabi", ",", "a", "professor", "of", "Asian", "history", "at", "Queens", "College", ",", "City", "University", "of", "New", "York", ",", "writes", "that", "\"", "Khubilai", "wished", "to", "be", "perceived", "both", "as", "the", "legitimate", "Khan", "of", "Khans", "of", "the", "Mongols", "and", "as", "the", "Emperor", "of", "China", ".", "Though", "he", "had", ",", "by", "the", "early", "1260s", ",", "become", "closely", "identified", "with", "China", ",", "he", "still", ",", "for", "a", "time", ",", "claimed", "universal", "rule", "\"", ",", "and", "yet", "\"", "despite", "his", "successes", "in", "China", "and", "Korea", ",", "Khubilai", "was", "unable", "to", "have", "himself", "accepted", "as", "the", "Great", "Khan", "\"", ".", "Thus", ",", "with", "such", "limited", "acceptance", "of", "his", "position", "as", "Great", "Khan", ",", "Kublai", "Khan", "increasingly", "became", "identified", "with", "China", "and", "sought", "support", "as", "Emperor", "of", "China", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 12, 16, 20, 28, 32, 37, 45, 48, 54, 60, 66, 70, 72, 75, 81, 85, 87, 97, 100, 104, 110, 117, 124, 131, 134, 138, 147, 152, 156, 159, 163, 174, 182, 187, 191, 197, 200, 206, 212, 216, 221, 229, 230, 239, 240, 242, 246, 252, 259, 264, 269, 278, 279, 286, 290, 294, 297, 309, 314, 315, 317, 323, 327, 332, 345, 350, 354, 359, 367, 372, 378, 383, 385, 390, 392, 400, 402, 407, 409, 415, 418, 426, 430, 436, 441, 443, 450, 457, 459, 461, 471, 474, 480, 488, 491, 498, 505, 507, 512, 523, 526, 530, 534, 536, 543, 548, 549, 558, 565, 568, 571, 581, 586, 589, 593, 604, 609, 612, 618, 621, 625, 633, 637, 640, 644, 652, 655, 660, 662, 669, 672, 675, 677, 680, 684, 690, 695, 697, 704, 712, 723, 728, 733, 735, 738, 743, 745, 749, 751, 755, 757, 765, 775, 779, 780, 782, 786, 790, 791, 799, 803, 813, 816, 822, 826, 831, 833, 842, 846, 853, 856, 861, 869, 878, 881, 885, 891, 895, 896, 898, 902, 904, 909, 914, 922, 933, 936, 940, 949, 952, 958, 962, 964, 971, 976, 989, 996, 1007, 1012, 1018, 1022, 1029, 1037, 1040, 1048, 1051, 1056 ] }
7857187a059347138b90ac8c5a88575f
What did Khubilai claim for a while?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "did", "Khubilai", "claim", "for", "a", "while", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 18, 24, 28, 30, 35 ] }
{ "text": [ "universal rule" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 765 ], "end": [ 778 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 153 ], "end": [ 154 ] } ] }
[ "universal rule" ]
SQuAD
Kublai Khan did not conquer the Song dynasty in South China until 1279, so Tibet was a component of the early Mongol Empire before it was combined into one of its descendant empires with the whole of China under the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368). Van Praag writes that this conquest "marked the end of independent China," which was then incorporated into the Yuan dynasty that ruled China, Tibet, Mongolia, Korea, parts of Siberia and Upper Burma. Morris Rossabi, a professor of Asian history at Queens College, City University of New York, writes that "Khubilai wished to be perceived both as the legitimate Khan of Khans of the Mongols and as the Emperor of China. Though he had, by the early 1260s, become closely identified with China, he still, for a time, claimed universal rule", and yet "despite his successes in China and Korea, Khubilai was unable to have himself accepted as the Great Khan". Thus, with such limited acceptance of his position as Great Khan, Kublai Khan increasingly became identified with China and sought support as Emperor of China.
{ "tokens": [ "Kublai", "Khan", "did", "not", "conquer", "the", "Song", "dynasty", "in", "South", "China", "until", "1279", ",", "so", "Tibet", "was", "a", "component", "of", "the", "early", "Mongol", "Empire", "before", "it", "was", "combined", "into", "one", "of", "its", "descendant", "empires", "with", "the", "whole", "of", "China", "under", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "(", "1271–1368", ")", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "this", "conquest", "\"", "marked", "the", "end", "of", "independent", "China", ",", "\"", "which", "was", "then", "incorporated", "into", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", "that", "ruled", "China", ",", "Tibet", ",", "Mongolia", ",", "Korea", ",", "parts", "of", "Siberia", "and", "Upper", "Burma", ".", "Morris", "Rossabi", ",", "a", "professor", "of", "Asian", "history", "at", "Queens", "College", ",", "City", "University", "of", "New", "York", ",", "writes", "that", "\"", "Khubilai", "wished", "to", "be", "perceived", "both", "as", "the", "legitimate", "Khan", "of", "Khans", "of", "the", "Mongols", "and", "as", "the", "Emperor", "of", "China", ".", "Though", "he", "had", ",", "by", "the", "early", "1260s", ",", "become", "closely", "identified", "with", "China", ",", "he", "still", ",", "for", "a", "time", ",", "claimed", "universal", "rule", "\"", ",", "and", "yet", "\"", "despite", "his", "successes", "in", "China", "and", "Korea", ",", "Khubilai", "was", "unable", "to", "have", "himself", "accepted", "as", "the", "Great", "Khan", "\"", ".", "Thus", ",", "with", "such", "limited", "acceptance", "of", "his", "position", "as", "Great", "Khan", ",", "Kublai", "Khan", "increasingly", "became", "identified", "with", "China", "and", "sought", "support", "as", "Emperor", "of", "China", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 12, 16, 20, 28, 32, 37, 45, 48, 54, 60, 66, 70, 72, 75, 81, 85, 87, 97, 100, 104, 110, 117, 124, 131, 134, 138, 147, 152, 156, 159, 163, 174, 182, 187, 191, 197, 200, 206, 212, 216, 221, 229, 230, 239, 240, 242, 246, 252, 259, 264, 269, 278, 279, 286, 290, 294, 297, 309, 314, 315, 317, 323, 327, 332, 345, 350, 354, 359, 367, 372, 378, 383, 385, 390, 392, 400, 402, 407, 409, 415, 418, 426, 430, 436, 441, 443, 450, 457, 459, 461, 471, 474, 480, 488, 491, 498, 505, 507, 512, 523, 526, 530, 534, 536, 543, 548, 549, 558, 565, 568, 571, 581, 586, 589, 593, 604, 609, 612, 618, 621, 625, 633, 637, 640, 644, 652, 655, 660, 662, 669, 672, 675, 677, 680, 684, 690, 695, 697, 704, 712, 723, 728, 733, 735, 738, 743, 745, 749, 751, 755, 757, 765, 775, 779, 780, 782, 786, 790, 791, 799, 803, 813, 816, 822, 826, 831, 833, 842, 846, 853, 856, 861, 869, 878, 881, 885, 891, 895, 896, 898, 902, 904, 909, 914, 922, 933, 936, 940, 949, 952, 958, 962, 964, 971, 976, 989, 996, 1007, 1012, 1018, 1022, 1029, 1037, 1040, 1048, 1051, 1056 ] }
2fafffa89aea4f93b6fcb9015e31672e
Where did Khubilai seek support as Emperor?
{ "tokens": [ "Where", "did", "Khubilai", "seek", "support", "as", "Emperor", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 10, 19, 24, 32, 35, 42 ] }
{ "text": [ "China" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 54 ], "end": [ 58 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 10 ], "end": [ 10 ] } ] }
[ "China" ]
SQuAD
According to the official Twenty-Four Histories, the History of Ming compiled in 1739 by the subsequent Qing dynasty (1644–1912), the Ming dynasty established the "É-Lì-Sī Army-Civilian Marshal Office" (Chinese: 俄力思軍民元帥府) in western Tibet and installed the "Ü-Tsang Itinerant High Commandery" and "Amdo-Kham Itinerant High Commandery" to administer Kham. The Mingshi states that administrative offices were set up under these high commanderies, including one Itinerant Commandery, three Pacification Commissioner's Offices, six Expedition Commissioner's Offices, four Wanhu offices (myriarchies, in command of 10,000 households each) and seventeen Qianhu offices (chiliarchies, each in command of 1,000 households).
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "the", "official", "Twenty", "-", "Four", "Histories", ",", "the", "History", "of", "Ming", "compiled", "in", "1739", "by", "the", "subsequent", "Qing", "dynasty", "(", "1644–1912", ")", ",", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "established", "the", "\"", "É", "-", "Lì", "-", "Sī", "Army", "-", "Civilian", "Marshal", "Office", "\"", "(", "Chinese", ":", "俄力思軍民元帥府", ")", "in", "western", "Tibet", "and", "installed", "the", "\"", "Ü", "-", "Tsang", "Itinerant", "High", "Commandery", "\"", "and", "\"", "Amdo", "-", "Kham", "Itinerant", "High", "Commandery", "\"", "to", "administer", "Kham", ".", "The", "Mingshi", "states", "that", "administrative", "offices", "were", "set", "up", "under", "these", "high", "commanderies", ",", "including", "one", "Itinerant", "Commandery", ",", "three", "Pacification", "Commissioner", "'s", "Offices", ",", "six", "Expedition", "Commissioner", "'s", "Offices", ",", "four", "Wanhu", "offices", "(", "myriarchies", ",", "in", "command", "of", "10,000", "households", "each", ")", "and", "seventeen", "Qianhu", "offices", "(", "chiliarchies", ",", "each", "in", "command", "of", "1,000", "households", ")", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 17, 26, 32, 33, 38, 47, 49, 53, 61, 64, 69, 78, 81, 86, 89, 93, 104, 109, 117, 118, 127, 128, 130, 134, 139, 147, 159, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169, 172, 176, 177, 186, 194, 200, 202, 203, 210, 212, 220, 222, 225, 233, 239, 243, 253, 257, 258, 259, 260, 266, 276, 281, 291, 293, 297, 298, 302, 303, 308, 318, 323, 333, 335, 338, 349, 353, 355, 359, 367, 374, 379, 394, 402, 407, 411, 414, 420, 426, 431, 443, 445, 455, 459, 469, 479, 481, 487, 500, 512, 515, 522, 524, 528, 539, 551, 554, 561, 563, 568, 574, 582, 583, 594, 596, 599, 607, 610, 617, 628, 632, 634, 638, 648, 655, 663, 664, 676, 678, 683, 686, 694, 697, 703, 713, 714 ] }
6babaf87728f40758ebb03735d924544
What years did the Qing dynasty rule?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "years", "did", "the", "Qing", "dynasty", "rule", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 11, 15, 19, 24, 32, 36 ] }
{ "text": [ "1644–1912" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 118 ], "end": [ 126 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 22 ], "end": [ 22 ] } ] }
[ "1644–1912" ]
SQuAD
According to the official Twenty-Four Histories, the History of Ming compiled in 1739 by the subsequent Qing dynasty (1644–1912), the Ming dynasty established the "É-Lì-Sī Army-Civilian Marshal Office" (Chinese: 俄力思軍民元帥府) in western Tibet and installed the "Ü-Tsang Itinerant High Commandery" and "Amdo-Kham Itinerant High Commandery" to administer Kham. The Mingshi states that administrative offices were set up under these high commanderies, including one Itinerant Commandery, three Pacification Commissioner's Offices, six Expedition Commissioner's Offices, four Wanhu offices (myriarchies, in command of 10,000 households each) and seventeen Qianhu offices (chiliarchies, each in command of 1,000 households).
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "the", "official", "Twenty", "-", "Four", "Histories", ",", "the", "History", "of", "Ming", "compiled", "in", "1739", "by", "the", "subsequent", "Qing", "dynasty", "(", "1644–1912", ")", ",", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "established", "the", "\"", "É", "-", "Lì", "-", "Sī", "Army", "-", "Civilian", "Marshal", "Office", "\"", "(", "Chinese", ":", "俄力思軍民元帥府", ")", "in", "western", "Tibet", "and", "installed", "the", "\"", "Ü", "-", "Tsang", "Itinerant", "High", "Commandery", "\"", "and", "\"", "Amdo", "-", "Kham", "Itinerant", "High", "Commandery", "\"", "to", "administer", "Kham", ".", "The", "Mingshi", "states", "that", "administrative", "offices", "were", "set", "up", "under", "these", "high", "commanderies", ",", "including", "one", "Itinerant", "Commandery", ",", "three", "Pacification", "Commissioner", "'s", "Offices", ",", "six", "Expedition", "Commissioner", "'s", "Offices", ",", "four", "Wanhu", "offices", "(", "myriarchies", ",", "in", "command", "of", "10,000", "households", "each", ")", "and", "seventeen", "Qianhu", "offices", "(", "chiliarchies", ",", "each", "in", "command", "of", "1,000", "households", ")", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 17, 26, 32, 33, 38, 47, 49, 53, 61, 64, 69, 78, 81, 86, 89, 93, 104, 109, 117, 118, 127, 128, 130, 134, 139, 147, 159, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169, 172, 176, 177, 186, 194, 200, 202, 203, 210, 212, 220, 222, 225, 233, 239, 243, 253, 257, 258, 259, 260, 266, 276, 281, 291, 293, 297, 298, 302, 303, 308, 318, 323, 333, 335, 338, 349, 353, 355, 359, 367, 374, 379, 394, 402, 407, 411, 414, 420, 426, 431, 443, 445, 455, 459, 469, 479, 481, 487, 500, 512, 515, 522, 524, 528, 539, 551, 554, 561, 563, 568, 574, 582, 583, 594, 596, 599, 607, 610, 617, 628, 632, 634, 638, 648, 655, 663, 664, 676, 678, 683, 686, 694, 697, 703, 713, 714 ] }
34bb256bc41c421fb2ac2afc4de28e0c
what year was the history of Ming produced?
{ "tokens": [ "what", "year", "was", "the", "history", "of", "Ming", "produced", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 10, 14, 18, 26, 29, 34, 42 ] }
{ "text": [ "1739" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 81 ], "end": [ 84 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 15 ], "end": [ 15 ] } ] }
[ "1739" ]
SQuAD
According to the official Twenty-Four Histories, the History of Ming compiled in 1739 by the subsequent Qing dynasty (1644–1912), the Ming dynasty established the "É-Lì-Sī Army-Civilian Marshal Office" (Chinese: 俄力思軍民元帥府) in western Tibet and installed the "Ü-Tsang Itinerant High Commandery" and "Amdo-Kham Itinerant High Commandery" to administer Kham. The Mingshi states that administrative offices were set up under these high commanderies, including one Itinerant Commandery, three Pacification Commissioner's Offices, six Expedition Commissioner's Offices, four Wanhu offices (myriarchies, in command of 10,000 households each) and seventeen Qianhu offices (chiliarchies, each in command of 1,000 households).
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "the", "official", "Twenty", "-", "Four", "Histories", ",", "the", "History", "of", "Ming", "compiled", "in", "1739", "by", "the", "subsequent", "Qing", "dynasty", "(", "1644–1912", ")", ",", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "established", "the", "\"", "É", "-", "Lì", "-", "Sī", "Army", "-", "Civilian", "Marshal", "Office", "\"", "(", "Chinese", ":", "俄力思軍民元帥府", ")", "in", "western", "Tibet", "and", "installed", "the", "\"", "Ü", "-", "Tsang", "Itinerant", "High", "Commandery", "\"", "and", "\"", "Amdo", "-", "Kham", "Itinerant", "High", "Commandery", "\"", "to", "administer", "Kham", ".", "The", "Mingshi", "states", "that", "administrative", "offices", "were", "set", "up", "under", "these", "high", "commanderies", ",", "including", "one", "Itinerant", "Commandery", ",", "three", "Pacification", "Commissioner", "'s", "Offices", ",", "six", "Expedition", "Commissioner", "'s", "Offices", ",", "four", "Wanhu", "offices", "(", "myriarchies", ",", "in", "command", "of", "10,000", "households", "each", ")", "and", "seventeen", "Qianhu", "offices", "(", "chiliarchies", ",", "each", "in", "command", "of", "1,000", "households", ")", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 17, 26, 32, 33, 38, 47, 49, 53, 61, 64, 69, 78, 81, 86, 89, 93, 104, 109, 117, 118, 127, 128, 130, 134, 139, 147, 159, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169, 172, 176, 177, 186, 194, 200, 202, 203, 210, 212, 220, 222, 225, 233, 239, 243, 253, 257, 258, 259, 260, 266, 276, 281, 291, 293, 297, 298, 302, 303, 308, 318, 323, 333, 335, 338, 349, 353, 355, 359, 367, 374, 379, 394, 402, 407, 411, 414, 420, 426, 431, 443, 445, 455, 459, 469, 479, 481, 487, 500, 512, 515, 522, 524, 528, 539, 551, 554, 561, 563, 568, 574, 582, 583, 594, 596, 599, 607, 610, 617, 628, 632, 634, 638, 648, 655, 663, 664, 676, 678, 683, 686, 694, 697, 703, 713, 714 ] }
092489c1403e4dcc8255f22a99be390d
What did the Ming dynasty create?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "did", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "create", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 13, 18, 26, 32 ] }
{ "text": [ "É-Lì-Sī Army-Civilian Marshal Office" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 164 ], "end": [ 199 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 31 ], "end": [ 40 ] } ] }
[ "É-Lì-Sī Army-Civilian Marshal Office" ]
SQuAD
According to the official Twenty-Four Histories, the History of Ming compiled in 1739 by the subsequent Qing dynasty (1644–1912), the Ming dynasty established the "É-Lì-Sī Army-Civilian Marshal Office" (Chinese: 俄力思軍民元帥府) in western Tibet and installed the "Ü-Tsang Itinerant High Commandery" and "Amdo-Kham Itinerant High Commandery" to administer Kham. The Mingshi states that administrative offices were set up under these high commanderies, including one Itinerant Commandery, three Pacification Commissioner's Offices, six Expedition Commissioner's Offices, four Wanhu offices (myriarchies, in command of 10,000 households each) and seventeen Qianhu offices (chiliarchies, each in command of 1,000 households).
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "the", "official", "Twenty", "-", "Four", "Histories", ",", "the", "History", "of", "Ming", "compiled", "in", "1739", "by", "the", "subsequent", "Qing", "dynasty", "(", "1644–1912", ")", ",", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "established", "the", "\"", "É", "-", "Lì", "-", "Sī", "Army", "-", "Civilian", "Marshal", "Office", "\"", "(", "Chinese", ":", "俄力思軍民元帥府", ")", "in", "western", "Tibet", "and", "installed", "the", "\"", "Ü", "-", "Tsang", "Itinerant", "High", "Commandery", "\"", "and", "\"", "Amdo", "-", "Kham", "Itinerant", "High", "Commandery", "\"", "to", "administer", "Kham", ".", "The", "Mingshi", "states", "that", "administrative", "offices", "were", "set", "up", "under", "these", "high", "commanderies", ",", "including", "one", "Itinerant", "Commandery", ",", "three", "Pacification", "Commissioner", "'s", "Offices", ",", "six", "Expedition", "Commissioner", "'s", "Offices", ",", "four", "Wanhu", "offices", "(", "myriarchies", ",", "in", "command", "of", "10,000", "households", "each", ")", "and", "seventeen", "Qianhu", "offices", "(", "chiliarchies", ",", "each", "in", "command", "of", "1,000", "households", ")", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 17, 26, 32, 33, 38, 47, 49, 53, 61, 64, 69, 78, 81, 86, 89, 93, 104, 109, 117, 118, 127, 128, 130, 134, 139, 147, 159, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169, 172, 176, 177, 186, 194, 200, 202, 203, 210, 212, 220, 222, 225, 233, 239, 243, 253, 257, 258, 259, 260, 266, 276, 281, 291, 293, 297, 298, 302, 303, 308, 318, 323, 333, 335, 338, 349, 353, 355, 359, 367, 374, 379, 394, 402, 407, 411, 414, 420, 426, 431, 443, 445, 455, 459, 469, 479, 481, 487, 500, 512, 515, 522, 524, 528, 539, 551, 554, 561, 563, 568, 574, 582, 583, 594, 596, 599, 607, 610, 617, 628, 632, 634, 638, 648, 655, 663, 664, 676, 678, 683, 686, 694, 697, 703, 713, 714 ] }
95d406b4d04b40d08f4b4d043342e862
How many Qianhu offices were there?
{ "tokens": [ "How", "many", "Qianhu", "offices", "were", "there", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 16, 24, 29, 34 ] }
{ "text": [ "seventeen Qianhu offices" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 638 ], "end": [ 661 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 119 ], "end": [ 121 ] } ] }
[ "seventeen Qianhu offices" ]
SQuAD
According to the official Twenty-Four Histories, the History of Ming compiled in 1739 by the subsequent Qing dynasty (1644–1912), the Ming dynasty established the "É-Lì-Sī Army-Civilian Marshal Office" (Chinese: 俄力思軍民元帥府) in western Tibet and installed the "Ü-Tsang Itinerant High Commandery" and "Amdo-Kham Itinerant High Commandery" to administer Kham. The Mingshi states that administrative offices were set up under these high commanderies, including one Itinerant Commandery, three Pacification Commissioner's Offices, six Expedition Commissioner's Offices, four Wanhu offices (myriarchies, in command of 10,000 households each) and seventeen Qianhu offices (chiliarchies, each in command of 1,000 households).
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "the", "official", "Twenty", "-", "Four", "Histories", ",", "the", "History", "of", "Ming", "compiled", "in", "1739", "by", "the", "subsequent", "Qing", "dynasty", "(", "1644–1912", ")", ",", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "established", "the", "\"", "É", "-", "Lì", "-", "Sī", "Army", "-", "Civilian", "Marshal", "Office", "\"", "(", "Chinese", ":", "俄力思軍民元帥府", ")", "in", "western", "Tibet", "and", "installed", "the", "\"", "Ü", "-", "Tsang", "Itinerant", "High", "Commandery", "\"", "and", "\"", "Amdo", "-", "Kham", "Itinerant", "High", "Commandery", "\"", "to", "administer", "Kham", ".", "The", "Mingshi", "states", "that", "administrative", "offices", "were", "set", "up", "under", "these", "high", "commanderies", ",", "including", "one", "Itinerant", "Commandery", ",", "three", "Pacification", "Commissioner", "'s", "Offices", ",", "six", "Expedition", "Commissioner", "'s", "Offices", ",", "four", "Wanhu", "offices", "(", "myriarchies", ",", "in", "command", "of", "10,000", "households", "each", ")", "and", "seventeen", "Qianhu", "offices", "(", "chiliarchies", ",", "each", "in", "command", "of", "1,000", "households", ")", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 17, 26, 32, 33, 38, 47, 49, 53, 61, 64, 69, 78, 81, 86, 89, 93, 104, 109, 117, 118, 127, 128, 130, 134, 139, 147, 159, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168, 169, 172, 176, 177, 186, 194, 200, 202, 203, 210, 212, 220, 222, 225, 233, 239, 243, 253, 257, 258, 259, 260, 266, 276, 281, 291, 293, 297, 298, 302, 303, 308, 318, 323, 333, 335, 338, 349, 353, 355, 359, 367, 374, 379, 394, 402, 407, 411, 414, 420, 426, 431, 443, 445, 455, 459, 469, 479, 481, 487, 500, 512, 515, 522, 524, 528, 539, 551, 554, 561, 563, 568, 574, 582, 583, 594, 596, 599, 607, 610, 617, 628, 632, 634, 638, 648, 655, 663, 664, 676, 678, 683, 686, 694, 697, 703, 713, 714 ] }
013c232e8919413cbefb8a19437258f2
where was the É-Lì-Sī Army-Civilian Marshal Office established?
{ "tokens": [ "where", "was", "the", "É", "-", "Lì", "-", "Sī", "Army", "-", "Civilian", "Marshal", "Office", "established", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 10, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 22, 26, 27, 36, 44, 51, 62 ] }
{ "text": [ "western Tibet" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 225 ], "end": [ 237 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 48 ], "end": [ 49 ] } ] }
[ "western Tibet" ]
SQuAD
Even though the Gelug exchanged gifts with and sent missions to the Ming court up until the 1430s, the Gelug was not mentioned in the Mingshi or the Mingshi Lu. On this, historian Li Tieh-tseng says of Tsongkhapa's refusal of Ming invitations to visit the Yongle Emperor's court:
{ "tokens": [ "Even", "though", "the", "Gelug", "exchanged", "gifts", "with", "and", "sent", "missions", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "up", "until", "the", "1430s", ",", "the", "Gelug", "was", "not", "mentioned", "in", "the", "Mingshi", "or", "the", "Mingshi", "Lu", ".", "On", "this", ",", "historian", "Li", "Tieh", "-", "tseng", "says", "of", "Tsongkhapa", "'s", "refusal", "of", "Ming", "invitations", "to", "visit", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "court", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 12, 16, 22, 32, 38, 43, 47, 52, 61, 64, 68, 73, 79, 82, 88, 92, 97, 99, 103, 109, 113, 117, 127, 130, 134, 142, 145, 149, 157, 159, 161, 164, 168, 170, 180, 183, 187, 188, 194, 199, 202, 212, 215, 223, 226, 231, 243, 246, 252, 256, 263, 270, 273, 278 ] }
544015ed87064485b3cac54fad7e3796
Who did the Gelug exchange gifts with?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "did", "the", "Gelug", "exchange", "gifts", "with", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 18, 27, 33, 37 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Ming court" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 64 ], "end": [ 77 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 11 ], "end": [ 13 ] } ] }
[ "the Ming court" ]
SQuAD
Even though the Gelug exchanged gifts with and sent missions to the Ming court up until the 1430s, the Gelug was not mentioned in the Mingshi or the Mingshi Lu. On this, historian Li Tieh-tseng says of Tsongkhapa's refusal of Ming invitations to visit the Yongle Emperor's court:
{ "tokens": [ "Even", "though", "the", "Gelug", "exchanged", "gifts", "with", "and", "sent", "missions", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "up", "until", "the", "1430s", ",", "the", "Gelug", "was", "not", "mentioned", "in", "the", "Mingshi", "or", "the", "Mingshi", "Lu", ".", "On", "this", ",", "historian", "Li", "Tieh", "-", "tseng", "says", "of", "Tsongkhapa", "'s", "refusal", "of", "Ming", "invitations", "to", "visit", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "court", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 12, 16, 22, 32, 38, 43, 47, 52, 61, 64, 68, 73, 79, 82, 88, 92, 97, 99, 103, 109, 113, 117, 127, 130, 134, 142, 145, 149, 157, 159, 161, 164, 168, 170, 180, 183, 187, 188, 194, 199, 202, 212, 215, 223, 226, 231, 243, 246, 252, 256, 263, 270, 273, 278 ] }
3a3e8ee3cdd24283bb839ba9b7622e9a
Until what year frame did the Gelug exchange gifts with the the Ming?
{ "tokens": [ "Until", "what", "year", "frame", "did", "the", "Gelug", "exchange", "gifts", "with", "the", "the", "Ming", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 11, 16, 22, 26, 30, 36, 45, 51, 56, 60, 64, 68 ] }
{ "text": [ "1430s" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 92 ], "end": [ 96 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 17 ], "end": [ 17 ] } ] }
[ "1430s" ]
SQuAD
Even though the Gelug exchanged gifts with and sent missions to the Ming court up until the 1430s, the Gelug was not mentioned in the Mingshi or the Mingshi Lu. On this, historian Li Tieh-tseng says of Tsongkhapa's refusal of Ming invitations to visit the Yongle Emperor's court:
{ "tokens": [ "Even", "though", "the", "Gelug", "exchanged", "gifts", "with", "and", "sent", "missions", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "up", "until", "the", "1430s", ",", "the", "Gelug", "was", "not", "mentioned", "in", "the", "Mingshi", "or", "the", "Mingshi", "Lu", ".", "On", "this", ",", "historian", "Li", "Tieh", "-", "tseng", "says", "of", "Tsongkhapa", "'s", "refusal", "of", "Ming", "invitations", "to", "visit", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "court", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 12, 16, 22, 32, 38, 43, 47, 52, 61, 64, 68, 73, 79, 82, 88, 92, 97, 99, 103, 109, 113, 117, 127, 130, 134, 142, 145, 149, 157, 159, 161, 164, 168, 170, 180, 183, 187, 188, 194, 199, 202, 212, 215, 223, 226, 231, 243, 246, 252, 256, 263, 270, 273, 278 ] }
c174c4ae24dc487bbfd91430835ff330
What was the Gelug not mentioned in?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "was", "the", "Gelug", "not", "mentioned", "in", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 13, 19, 23, 33, 35 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Mingshi or the Mingshi Lu" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 130 ], "end": [ 158 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 25 ], "end": [ 30 ] } ] }
[ "the Mingshi or the Mingshi Lu" ]
SQuAD
The late Turrell V. Wylie, a former professor of the University of Washington, and Li Tieh-tseng argue that the reliability of the heavily censored History of Ming as a credible source on Sino-Tibetan relations is questionable, in the light of modern scholarship. Other historians also assert that these Ming titles were nominal and did not actually confer the authority that the earlier Yuan titles had. Van Praag writes that the "numerous economically motivated Tibetan missions to the Ming Court are referred to as 'tributary missions' in the Ming Shih." Van Praag writes that these "tributary missions" were simply prompted by China's need for horses from Tibet, since a viable horse market in Mongol lands was closed as a result of incessant conflict. Morris Rossabi also writes that "Tibet, which had extensive contacts with China during the Yuan, scarcely had diplomatic relations with the Ming."
{ "tokens": [ "The", "late", "Turrell", "V.", "Wylie", ",", "a", "former", "professor", "of", "the", "University", "of", "Washington", ",", "and", "Li", "Tieh", "-", "tseng", "argue", "that", "the", "reliability", "of", "the", "heavily", "censored", "History", "of", "Ming", "as", "a", "credible", "source", "on", "Sino", "-", "Tibetan", "relations", "is", "questionable", ",", "in", "the", "light", "of", "modern", "scholarship", ".", "Other", "historians", "also", "assert", "that", "these", "Ming", "titles", "were", "nominal", "and", "did", "not", "actually", "confer", "the", "authority", "that", "the", "earlier", "Yuan", "titles", "had", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "the", "\"", "numerous", "economically", "motivated", "Tibetan", "missions", "to", "the", "Ming", "Court", "are", "referred", "to", "as", "'", "tributary", "missions", "'", "in", "the", "Ming", "Shih", ".", "\"", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "these", "\"", "tributary", "missions", "\"", "were", "simply", "prompted", "by", "China", "'s", "need", "for", "horses", "from", "Tibet", ",", "since", "a", "viable", "horse", "market", "in", "Mongol", "lands", "was", "closed", "as", "a", "result", "of", "incessant", "conflict", ".", "Morris", "Rossabi", "also", "writes", "that", "\"", "Tibet", ",", "which", "had", "extensive", "contacts", "with", "China", "during", "the", "Yuan", ",", "scarcely", "had", "diplomatic", "relations", "with", "the", "Ming", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 17, 20, 25, 27, 29, 36, 46, 49, 53, 64, 67, 77, 79, 83, 86, 90, 91, 97, 103, 108, 112, 124, 127, 131, 139, 148, 156, 159, 164, 167, 169, 178, 185, 188, 192, 193, 201, 211, 214, 226, 228, 231, 235, 241, 244, 251, 262, 264, 270, 281, 286, 293, 298, 304, 309, 316, 321, 329, 333, 337, 341, 350, 357, 361, 371, 376, 380, 388, 393, 400, 403, 405, 409, 415, 422, 427, 431, 432, 441, 454, 464, 472, 481, 484, 488, 493, 499, 503, 512, 515, 518, 519, 529, 537, 539, 542, 546, 551, 555, 556, 558, 562, 568, 575, 580, 586, 587, 597, 605, 607, 612, 619, 628, 631, 636, 639, 644, 648, 655, 660, 665, 667, 673, 675, 682, 688, 695, 698, 705, 711, 715, 722, 725, 727, 734, 737, 747, 755, 757, 764, 772, 777, 784, 789, 790, 795, 797, 803, 807, 817, 826, 831, 837, 844, 848, 852, 854, 863, 867, 878, 888, 893, 897, 901, 902 ] }
d26bdafc14284143b46db844acf871fa
who was a professor of the University of Washington?
{ "tokens": [ "who", "was", "a", "professor", "of", "the", "University", "of", "Washington", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 10, 20, 23, 27, 38, 41, 51 ] }
{ "text": [ "Turrell V. Wylie" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 9 ], "end": [ 24 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 2 ], "end": [ 4 ] } ] }
[ "Turrell V. Wylie" ]
SQuAD
The late Turrell V. Wylie, a former professor of the University of Washington, and Li Tieh-tseng argue that the reliability of the heavily censored History of Ming as a credible source on Sino-Tibetan relations is questionable, in the light of modern scholarship. Other historians also assert that these Ming titles were nominal and did not actually confer the authority that the earlier Yuan titles had. Van Praag writes that the "numerous economically motivated Tibetan missions to the Ming Court are referred to as 'tributary missions' in the Ming Shih." Van Praag writes that these "tributary missions" were simply prompted by China's need for horses from Tibet, since a viable horse market in Mongol lands was closed as a result of incessant conflict. Morris Rossabi also writes that "Tibet, which had extensive contacts with China during the Yuan, scarcely had diplomatic relations with the Ming."
{ "tokens": [ "The", "late", "Turrell", "V.", "Wylie", ",", "a", "former", "professor", "of", "the", "University", "of", "Washington", ",", "and", "Li", "Tieh", "-", "tseng", "argue", "that", "the", "reliability", "of", "the", "heavily", "censored", "History", "of", "Ming", "as", "a", "credible", "source", "on", "Sino", "-", "Tibetan", "relations", "is", "questionable", ",", "in", "the", "light", "of", "modern", "scholarship", ".", "Other", "historians", "also", "assert", "that", "these", "Ming", "titles", "were", "nominal", "and", "did", "not", "actually", "confer", "the", "authority", "that", "the", "earlier", "Yuan", "titles", "had", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "the", "\"", "numerous", "economically", "motivated", "Tibetan", "missions", "to", "the", "Ming", "Court", "are", "referred", "to", "as", "'", "tributary", "missions", "'", "in", "the", "Ming", "Shih", ".", "\"", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "these", "\"", "tributary", "missions", "\"", "were", "simply", "prompted", "by", "China", "'s", "need", "for", "horses", "from", "Tibet", ",", "since", "a", "viable", "horse", "market", "in", "Mongol", "lands", "was", "closed", "as", "a", "result", "of", "incessant", "conflict", ".", "Morris", "Rossabi", "also", "writes", "that", "\"", "Tibet", ",", "which", "had", "extensive", "contacts", "with", "China", "during", "the", "Yuan", ",", "scarcely", "had", "diplomatic", "relations", "with", "the", "Ming", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 17, 20, 25, 27, 29, 36, 46, 49, 53, 64, 67, 77, 79, 83, 86, 90, 91, 97, 103, 108, 112, 124, 127, 131, 139, 148, 156, 159, 164, 167, 169, 178, 185, 188, 192, 193, 201, 211, 214, 226, 228, 231, 235, 241, 244, 251, 262, 264, 270, 281, 286, 293, 298, 304, 309, 316, 321, 329, 333, 337, 341, 350, 357, 361, 371, 376, 380, 388, 393, 400, 403, 405, 409, 415, 422, 427, 431, 432, 441, 454, 464, 472, 481, 484, 488, 493, 499, 503, 512, 515, 518, 519, 529, 537, 539, 542, 546, 551, 555, 556, 558, 562, 568, 575, 580, 586, 587, 597, 605, 607, 612, 619, 628, 631, 636, 639, 644, 648, 655, 660, 665, 667, 673, 675, 682, 688, 695, 698, 705, 711, 715, 722, 725, 727, 734, 737, 747, 755, 757, 764, 772, 777, 784, 789, 790, 795, 797, 803, 807, 817, 826, 831, 837, 844, 848, 852, 854, 863, 867, 878, 888, 893, 897, 901, 902 ] }
032c98f1ecd34549971aa4e4ff2ef27b
Who believed that Tibet barely had any diplomatic relations with the Ming?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "believed", "that", "Tibet", "barely", "had", "any", "diplomatic", "relations", "with", "the", "Ming", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 13, 18, 24, 31, 35, 39, 50, 60, 65, 69, 73 ] }
{ "text": [ "Morris Rossabi" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 757 ], "end": [ 770 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 141 ], "end": [ 142 ] } ] }
[ "Morris Rossabi" ]
SQuAD
Dreyfus writes that after the Phagmodrupa lost its centralizing power over Tibet in 1434, several attempts by other families to establish hegemonies failed over the next two centuries until 1642 with the 5th Dalai Lama's effective hegemony over Tibet.
{ "tokens": [ "Dreyfus", "writes", "that", "after", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "lost", "its", "centralizing", "power", "over", "Tibet", "in", "1434", ",", "several", "attempts", "by", "other", "families", "to", "establish", "hegemonies", "failed", "over", "the", "next", "two", "centuries", "until", "1642", "with", "the", "5th", "Dalai", "Lama", "'s", "effective", "hegemony", "over", "Tibet", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 8, 15, 20, 26, 30, 42, 47, 51, 64, 70, 75, 81, 84, 88, 90, 98, 107, 110, 116, 125, 128, 138, 149, 156, 161, 165, 170, 174, 184, 190, 195, 200, 204, 208, 214, 218, 221, 231, 240, 245, 250 ] }
5898a86a36dc4a309904e83bb018cbd1
Who lost their power over Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "lost", "their", "power", "over", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 15, 21, 26, 31 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Phagmodrupa" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 26 ], "end": [ 40 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 4 ], "end": [ 5 ] } ] }
[ "the Phagmodrupa" ]
SQuAD
Dreyfus writes that after the Phagmodrupa lost its centralizing power over Tibet in 1434, several attempts by other families to establish hegemonies failed over the next two centuries until 1642 with the 5th Dalai Lama's effective hegemony over Tibet.
{ "tokens": [ "Dreyfus", "writes", "that", "after", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "lost", "its", "centralizing", "power", "over", "Tibet", "in", "1434", ",", "several", "attempts", "by", "other", "families", "to", "establish", "hegemonies", "failed", "over", "the", "next", "two", "centuries", "until", "1642", "with", "the", "5th", "Dalai", "Lama", "'s", "effective", "hegemony", "over", "Tibet", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 8, 15, 20, 26, 30, 42, 47, 51, 64, 70, 75, 81, 84, 88, 90, 98, 107, 110, 116, 125, 128, 138, 149, 156, 161, 165, 170, 174, 184, 190, 195, 200, 204, 208, 214, 218, 221, 231, 240, 245, 250 ] }
03890a0220d843d69bee2413dc56e479
What year did the Phagmodrupa lose their power over Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "year", "did", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "lose", "their", "power", "over", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 10, 14, 18, 30, 35, 41, 47, 52, 57 ] }
{ "text": [ "1434" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 84 ], "end": [ 87 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 13 ], "end": [ 13 ] } ] }
[ "1434" ]
SQuAD
Dreyfus writes that after the Phagmodrupa lost its centralizing power over Tibet in 1434, several attempts by other families to establish hegemonies failed over the next two centuries until 1642 with the 5th Dalai Lama's effective hegemony over Tibet.
{ "tokens": [ "Dreyfus", "writes", "that", "after", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "lost", "its", "centralizing", "power", "over", "Tibet", "in", "1434", ",", "several", "attempts", "by", "other", "families", "to", "establish", "hegemonies", "failed", "over", "the", "next", "two", "centuries", "until", "1642", "with", "the", "5th", "Dalai", "Lama", "'s", "effective", "hegemony", "over", "Tibet", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 8, 15, 20, 26, 30, 42, 47, 51, 64, 70, 75, 81, 84, 88, 90, 98, 107, 110, 116, 125, 128, 138, 149, 156, 161, 165, 170, 174, 184, 190, 195, 200, 204, 208, 214, 218, 221, 231, 240, 245, 250 ] }
96794a4fb2704af2be5f18c9b9324557
What year did the 5th Dalai lama start to dominate over Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "year", "did", "the", "5th", "Dalai", "lama", "start", "to", "dominate", "over", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 10, 14, 18, 22, 28, 33, 39, 42, 51, 56, 61 ] }
{ "text": [ "1642" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 190 ], "end": [ 193 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 30 ], "end": [ 30 ] } ] }
[ "1642" ]
SQuAD
Dreyfus writes that after the Phagmodrupa lost its centralizing power over Tibet in 1434, several attempts by other families to establish hegemonies failed over the next two centuries until 1642 with the 5th Dalai Lama's effective hegemony over Tibet.
{ "tokens": [ "Dreyfus", "writes", "that", "after", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "lost", "its", "centralizing", "power", "over", "Tibet", "in", "1434", ",", "several", "attempts", "by", "other", "families", "to", "establish", "hegemonies", "failed", "over", "the", "next", "two", "centuries", "until", "1642", "with", "the", "5th", "Dalai", "Lama", "'s", "effective", "hegemony", "over", "Tibet", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 8, 15, 20, 26, 30, 42, 47, 51, 64, 70, 75, 81, 84, 88, 90, 98, 107, 110, 116, 125, 128, 138, 149, 156, 161, 165, 170, 174, 184, 190, 195, 200, 204, 208, 214, 218, 221, 231, 240, 245, 250 ] }
cb6f225db5ed40c985630268e826b273
What did the other families fail to establish?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "did", "the", "other", "families", "fail", "to", "establish", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 13, 19, 28, 33, 36, 45 ] }
{ "text": [ "hegemonies" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 138 ], "end": [ 147 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 22 ], "end": [ 22 ] } ] }
[ "hegemonies" ]
SQuAD
The Ming dynasty granted titles to lamas of schools such as the Karmapa Kargyu, but the latter had previously declined Mongol invitations to receive titles. When the Ming Yongle Emperor invited Je Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), founder of the Gelug school, to come to the Ming court and pay tribute, the latter declined. Wang and Nyima write that this was due to old age and physical weakness, and also because of efforts being made to build three major monasteries. Chen Qingying states that Tsongkhapa wrote a letter to decline the Emperor's invitation, and in this reply, Tsongkhapa wrote:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Ming", "dynasty", "granted", "titles", "to", "lamas", "of", "schools", "such", "as", "the", "Karmapa", "Kargyu", ",", "but", "the", "latter", "had", "previously", "declined", "Mongol", "invitations", "to", "receive", "titles", ".", "When", "the", "Ming", "Yongle", "Emperor", "invited", "Je", "Tsongkhapa", "(", "1357–1419", ")", ",", "founder", "of", "the", "Gelug", "school", ",", "to", "come", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "and", "pay", "tribute", ",", "the", "latter", "declined", ".", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "write", "that", "this", "was", "due", "to", "old", "age", "and", "physical", "weakness", ",", "and", "also", "because", "of", "efforts", "being", "made", "to", "build", "three", "major", "monasteries", ".", "Chen", "Qingying", "states", "that", "Tsongkhapa", "wrote", "a", "letter", "to", "decline", "the", "Emperor", "'s", "invitation", ",", "and", "in", "this", "reply", ",", "Tsongkhapa", "wrote", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 17, 25, 32, 35, 41, 44, 52, 57, 60, 64, 72, 78, 80, 84, 88, 95, 99, 110, 119, 126, 138, 141, 149, 155, 157, 162, 166, 171, 178, 186, 194, 197, 208, 209, 218, 219, 221, 229, 232, 236, 242, 248, 250, 253, 258, 261, 265, 270, 276, 280, 284, 291, 293, 297, 304, 312, 314, 319, 323, 329, 335, 340, 345, 349, 353, 356, 360, 364, 368, 377, 385, 387, 391, 396, 404, 407, 415, 421, 426, 429, 435, 441, 447, 458, 460, 465, 474, 481, 486, 497, 503, 505, 512, 515, 523, 527, 534, 537, 547, 549, 553, 556, 561, 566, 568, 579, 584 ] }
ad85519248b9439baa000baa68c2fd37
The Ming Dynasty granted what titles to lamas of schools?
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Ming", "Dynasty", "granted", "what", "titles", "to", "lamas", "of", "schools", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 17, 25, 30, 37, 40, 46, 49, 56 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Karmapa Kargyu" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 60 ], "end": [ 77 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 11 ], "end": [ 13 ] } ] }
[ "the Karmapa Kargyu" ]
SQuAD
The Ming dynasty granted titles to lamas of schools such as the Karmapa Kargyu, but the latter had previously declined Mongol invitations to receive titles. When the Ming Yongle Emperor invited Je Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), founder of the Gelug school, to come to the Ming court and pay tribute, the latter declined. Wang and Nyima write that this was due to old age and physical weakness, and also because of efforts being made to build three major monasteries. Chen Qingying states that Tsongkhapa wrote a letter to decline the Emperor's invitation, and in this reply, Tsongkhapa wrote:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Ming", "dynasty", "granted", "titles", "to", "lamas", "of", "schools", "such", "as", "the", "Karmapa", "Kargyu", ",", "but", "the", "latter", "had", "previously", "declined", "Mongol", "invitations", "to", "receive", "titles", ".", "When", "the", "Ming", "Yongle", "Emperor", "invited", "Je", "Tsongkhapa", "(", "1357–1419", ")", ",", "founder", "of", "the", "Gelug", "school", ",", "to", "come", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "and", "pay", "tribute", ",", "the", "latter", "declined", ".", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "write", "that", "this", "was", "due", "to", "old", "age", "and", "physical", "weakness", ",", "and", "also", "because", "of", "efforts", "being", "made", "to", "build", "three", "major", "monasteries", ".", "Chen", "Qingying", "states", "that", "Tsongkhapa", "wrote", "a", "letter", "to", "decline", "the", "Emperor", "'s", "invitation", ",", "and", "in", "this", "reply", ",", "Tsongkhapa", "wrote", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 17, 25, 32, 35, 41, 44, 52, 57, 60, 64, 72, 78, 80, 84, 88, 95, 99, 110, 119, 126, 138, 141, 149, 155, 157, 162, 166, 171, 178, 186, 194, 197, 208, 209, 218, 219, 221, 229, 232, 236, 242, 248, 250, 253, 258, 261, 265, 270, 276, 280, 284, 291, 293, 297, 304, 312, 314, 319, 323, 329, 335, 340, 345, 349, 353, 356, 360, 364, 368, 377, 385, 387, 391, 396, 404, 407, 415, 421, 426, 429, 435, 441, 447, 458, 460, 465, 474, 481, 486, 497, 503, 505, 512, 515, 523, 527, 534, 537, 547, 549, 553, 556, 561, 566, 568, 579, 584 ] }
3a454f73c4f34faa952d751f46408bec
Who did the Ming Dynasty decline titles from after receiving invitations?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "did", "the", "Ming", "Dynasty", "decline", "titles", "from", "after", "receiving", "invitations", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 17, 25, 33, 40, 45, 51, 61, 72 ] }
{ "text": [ "Mongol" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 119 ], "end": [ 124 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 21 ], "end": [ 21 ] } ] }
[ "Mongol" ]
SQuAD
The Ming dynasty granted titles to lamas of schools such as the Karmapa Kargyu, but the latter had previously declined Mongol invitations to receive titles. When the Ming Yongle Emperor invited Je Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), founder of the Gelug school, to come to the Ming court and pay tribute, the latter declined. Wang and Nyima write that this was due to old age and physical weakness, and also because of efforts being made to build three major monasteries. Chen Qingying states that Tsongkhapa wrote a letter to decline the Emperor's invitation, and in this reply, Tsongkhapa wrote:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Ming", "dynasty", "granted", "titles", "to", "lamas", "of", "schools", "such", "as", "the", "Karmapa", "Kargyu", ",", "but", "the", "latter", "had", "previously", "declined", "Mongol", "invitations", "to", "receive", "titles", ".", "When", "the", "Ming", "Yongle", "Emperor", "invited", "Je", "Tsongkhapa", "(", "1357–1419", ")", ",", "founder", "of", "the", "Gelug", "school", ",", "to", "come", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "and", "pay", "tribute", ",", "the", "latter", "declined", ".", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "write", "that", "this", "was", "due", "to", "old", "age", "and", "physical", "weakness", ",", "and", "also", "because", "of", "efforts", "being", "made", "to", "build", "three", "major", "monasteries", ".", "Chen", "Qingying", "states", "that", "Tsongkhapa", "wrote", "a", "letter", "to", "decline", "the", "Emperor", "'s", "invitation", ",", "and", "in", "this", "reply", ",", "Tsongkhapa", "wrote", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 17, 25, 32, 35, 41, 44, 52, 57, 60, 64, 72, 78, 80, 84, 88, 95, 99, 110, 119, 126, 138, 141, 149, 155, 157, 162, 166, 171, 178, 186, 194, 197, 208, 209, 218, 219, 221, 229, 232, 236, 242, 248, 250, 253, 258, 261, 265, 270, 276, 280, 284, 291, 293, 297, 304, 312, 314, 319, 323, 329, 335, 340, 345, 349, 353, 356, 360, 364, 368, 377, 385, 387, 391, 396, 404, 407, 415, 421, 426, 429, 435, 441, 447, 458, 460, 465, 474, 481, 486, 497, 503, 505, 512, 515, 523, 527, 534, 537, 547, 549, 553, 556, 561, 566, 568, 579, 584 ] }
462172ce5bc245cf96e8e751059e1bdc
Who was the founder of the Gelug school?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "was", "the", "founder", "of", "the", "Gelug", "school", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 20, 23, 27, 33, 39 ] }
{ "text": [ "Je Tsongkhapa" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 194 ], "end": [ 206 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 33 ], "end": [ 34 ] } ] }
[ "Je Tsongkhapa" ]
SQuAD
The Ming dynasty granted titles to lamas of schools such as the Karmapa Kargyu, but the latter had previously declined Mongol invitations to receive titles. When the Ming Yongle Emperor invited Je Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), founder of the Gelug school, to come to the Ming court and pay tribute, the latter declined. Wang and Nyima write that this was due to old age and physical weakness, and also because of efforts being made to build three major monasteries. Chen Qingying states that Tsongkhapa wrote a letter to decline the Emperor's invitation, and in this reply, Tsongkhapa wrote:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Ming", "dynasty", "granted", "titles", "to", "lamas", "of", "schools", "such", "as", "the", "Karmapa", "Kargyu", ",", "but", "the", "latter", "had", "previously", "declined", "Mongol", "invitations", "to", "receive", "titles", ".", "When", "the", "Ming", "Yongle", "Emperor", "invited", "Je", "Tsongkhapa", "(", "1357–1419", ")", ",", "founder", "of", "the", "Gelug", "school", ",", "to", "come", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "and", "pay", "tribute", ",", "the", "latter", "declined", ".", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "write", "that", "this", "was", "due", "to", "old", "age", "and", "physical", "weakness", ",", "and", "also", "because", "of", "efforts", "being", "made", "to", "build", "three", "major", "monasteries", ".", "Chen", "Qingying", "states", "that", "Tsongkhapa", "wrote", "a", "letter", "to", "decline", "the", "Emperor", "'s", "invitation", ",", "and", "in", "this", "reply", ",", "Tsongkhapa", "wrote", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 17, 25, 32, 35, 41, 44, 52, 57, 60, 64, 72, 78, 80, 84, 88, 95, 99, 110, 119, 126, 138, 141, 149, 155, 157, 162, 166, 171, 178, 186, 194, 197, 208, 209, 218, 219, 221, 229, 232, 236, 242, 248, 250, 253, 258, 261, 265, 270, 276, 280, 284, 291, 293, 297, 304, 312, 314, 319, 323, 329, 335, 340, 345, 349, 353, 356, 360, 364, 368, 377, 385, 387, 391, 396, 404, 407, 415, 421, 426, 429, 435, 441, 447, 458, 460, 465, 474, 481, 486, 497, 503, 505, 512, 515, 523, 527, 534, 537, 547, 549, 553, 556, 561, 566, 568, 579, 584 ] }
3c6f8de883194e4a9b801b5089969389
Who invited Je Tsongkhapa to come pay tribute?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "invited", "Je", "Tsongkhapa", "to", "come", "pay", "tribute", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 12, 15, 26, 29, 34, 38, 45 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Ming Yongle Emperor" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 162 ], "end": [ 184 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 28 ], "end": [ 31 ] } ] }
[ "the Ming Yongle Emperor" ]
SQuAD
The Ming dynasty granted titles to lamas of schools such as the Karmapa Kargyu, but the latter had previously declined Mongol invitations to receive titles. When the Ming Yongle Emperor invited Je Tsongkhapa (1357–1419), founder of the Gelug school, to come to the Ming court and pay tribute, the latter declined. Wang and Nyima write that this was due to old age and physical weakness, and also because of efforts being made to build three major monasteries. Chen Qingying states that Tsongkhapa wrote a letter to decline the Emperor's invitation, and in this reply, Tsongkhapa wrote:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Ming", "dynasty", "granted", "titles", "to", "lamas", "of", "schools", "such", "as", "the", "Karmapa", "Kargyu", ",", "but", "the", "latter", "had", "previously", "declined", "Mongol", "invitations", "to", "receive", "titles", ".", "When", "the", "Ming", "Yongle", "Emperor", "invited", "Je", "Tsongkhapa", "(", "1357–1419", ")", ",", "founder", "of", "the", "Gelug", "school", ",", "to", "come", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "and", "pay", "tribute", ",", "the", "latter", "declined", ".", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "write", "that", "this", "was", "due", "to", "old", "age", "and", "physical", "weakness", ",", "and", "also", "because", "of", "efforts", "being", "made", "to", "build", "three", "major", "monasteries", ".", "Chen", "Qingying", "states", "that", "Tsongkhapa", "wrote", "a", "letter", "to", "decline", "the", "Emperor", "'s", "invitation", ",", "and", "in", "this", "reply", ",", "Tsongkhapa", "wrote", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 17, 25, 32, 35, 41, 44, 52, 57, 60, 64, 72, 78, 80, 84, 88, 95, 99, 110, 119, 126, 138, 141, 149, 155, 157, 162, 166, 171, 178, 186, 194, 197, 208, 209, 218, 219, 221, 229, 232, 236, 242, 248, 250, 253, 258, 261, 265, 270, 276, 280, 284, 291, 293, 297, 304, 312, 314, 319, 323, 329, 335, 340, 345, 349, 353, 356, 360, 364, 368, 377, 385, 387, 391, 396, 404, 407, 415, 421, 426, 429, 435, 441, 447, 458, 460, 465, 474, 481, 486, 497, 503, 505, 512, 515, 523, 527, 534, 537, 547, 549, 553, 556, 561, 566, 568, 579, 584 ] }
780e2330620d4eec803418b2e7d27340
Who wrote the letter declining the Emperor's invitation?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "wrote", "the", "letter", "declining", "the", "Emperor", "'s", "invitation", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 10, 14, 21, 31, 35, 42, 45, 55 ] }
{ "text": [ "Tsongkhapa" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 197 ], "end": [ 206 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 34 ], "end": [ 34 ] } ] }
[ "Tsongkhapa" ]
SQuAD
Some scholars note that Tibetan leaders during the Ming frequently engaged in civil war and conducted their own foreign diplomacy with neighboring states such as Nepal. Some scholars underscore the commercial aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship, noting the Ming dynasty's shortage of horses for warfare and thus the importance of the horse trade with Tibet. Others argue that the significant religious nature of the relationship of the Ming court with Tibetan lamas is underrepresented in modern scholarship. In hopes of reviving the unique relationship of the earlier Mongol leader Kublai Khan (r. 1260–1294) and his spiritual superior Drogön Chögyal Phagpa (1235–1280) of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism, the Yongle Emperor (r. 1402–1424) made a concerted effort to build a secular and religious alliance with Deshin Shekpa (1384–1415), the Karmapa of the Karma Kagyu school. However, the Yongle Emperor's attempts were unsuccessful.
{ "tokens": [ "Some", "scholars", "note", "that", "Tibetan", "leaders", "during", "the", "Ming", "frequently", "engaged", "in", "civil", "war", "and", "conducted", "their", "own", "foreign", "diplomacy", "with", "neighboring", "states", "such", "as", "Nepal", ".", "Some", "scholars", "underscore", "the", "commercial", "aspect", "of", "the", "Ming", "-", "Tibetan", "relationship", ",", "noting", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "'s", "shortage", "of", "horses", "for", "warfare", "and", "thus", "the", "importance", "of", "the", "horse", "trade", "with", "Tibet", ".", "Others", "argue", "that", "the", "significant", "religious", "nature", "of", "the", "relationship", "of", "the", "Ming", "court", "with", "Tibetan", "lamas", "is", "underrepresented", "in", "modern", "scholarship", ".", "In", "hopes", "of", "reviving", "the", "unique", "relationship", "of", "the", "earlier", "Mongol", "leader", "Kublai", "Khan", "(", "r.", "1260–1294", ")", "and", "his", "spiritual", "superior", "Drogön", "Chögyal", "Phagpa", "(", "1235–1280", ")", "of", "the", "Sakya", "school", "of", "Tibetan", "Buddhism", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1402–1424", ")", "made", "a", "concerted", "effort", "to", "build", "a", "secular", "and", "religious", "alliance", "with", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "(", "1384–1415", ")", ",", "the", "Karmapa", "of", "the", "Karma", "Kagyu", "school", ".", "However", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "attempts", "were", "unsuccessful", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 14, 19, 24, 32, 40, 47, 51, 56, 67, 75, 78, 84, 88, 92, 102, 108, 112, 120, 130, 135, 147, 154, 159, 162, 167, 169, 174, 183, 194, 198, 209, 216, 219, 223, 227, 228, 236, 248, 250, 257, 261, 266, 273, 276, 285, 288, 295, 299, 307, 311, 316, 320, 331, 334, 338, 344, 350, 355, 360, 362, 369, 375, 380, 384, 396, 406, 413, 416, 420, 433, 436, 440, 445, 451, 456, 464, 470, 473, 490, 493, 500, 511, 513, 516, 522, 525, 534, 538, 545, 558, 561, 565, 573, 580, 587, 594, 599, 600, 603, 612, 614, 618, 622, 632, 641, 648, 656, 663, 664, 673, 675, 678, 682, 688, 695, 698, 706, 714, 716, 720, 727, 735, 736, 739, 748, 750, 755, 757, 767, 774, 777, 783, 785, 793, 797, 807, 816, 821, 828, 835, 836, 845, 846, 848, 852, 860, 863, 867, 873, 879, 885, 887, 894, 896, 900, 907, 914, 917, 926, 931, 943 ] }
a1688a9c1a5f4788b1d036e79468e1c6
What important trade did the Ming Dynasty have with Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "important", "trade", "did", "the", "Ming", "Dynasty", "have", "with", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 15, 21, 25, 29, 34, 42, 47, 52, 57 ] }
{ "text": [ "horse trade" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 338 ], "end": [ 348 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 56 ], "end": [ 57 ] } ] }
[ "horse trade" ]
SQuAD
Some scholars note that Tibetan leaders during the Ming frequently engaged in civil war and conducted their own foreign diplomacy with neighboring states such as Nepal. Some scholars underscore the commercial aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship, noting the Ming dynasty's shortage of horses for warfare and thus the importance of the horse trade with Tibet. Others argue that the significant religious nature of the relationship of the Ming court with Tibetan lamas is underrepresented in modern scholarship. In hopes of reviving the unique relationship of the earlier Mongol leader Kublai Khan (r. 1260–1294) and his spiritual superior Drogön Chögyal Phagpa (1235–1280) of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism, the Yongle Emperor (r. 1402–1424) made a concerted effort to build a secular and religious alliance with Deshin Shekpa (1384–1415), the Karmapa of the Karma Kagyu school. However, the Yongle Emperor's attempts were unsuccessful.
{ "tokens": [ "Some", "scholars", "note", "that", "Tibetan", "leaders", "during", "the", "Ming", "frequently", "engaged", "in", "civil", "war", "and", "conducted", "their", "own", "foreign", "diplomacy", "with", "neighboring", "states", "such", "as", "Nepal", ".", "Some", "scholars", "underscore", "the", "commercial", "aspect", "of", "the", "Ming", "-", "Tibetan", "relationship", ",", "noting", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "'s", "shortage", "of", "horses", "for", "warfare", "and", "thus", "the", "importance", "of", "the", "horse", "trade", "with", "Tibet", ".", "Others", "argue", "that", "the", "significant", "religious", "nature", "of", "the", "relationship", "of", "the", "Ming", "court", "with", "Tibetan", "lamas", "is", "underrepresented", "in", "modern", "scholarship", ".", "In", "hopes", "of", "reviving", "the", "unique", "relationship", "of", "the", "earlier", "Mongol", "leader", "Kublai", "Khan", "(", "r.", "1260–1294", ")", "and", "his", "spiritual", "superior", "Drogön", "Chögyal", "Phagpa", "(", "1235–1280", ")", "of", "the", "Sakya", "school", "of", "Tibetan", "Buddhism", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1402–1424", ")", "made", "a", "concerted", "effort", "to", "build", "a", "secular", "and", "religious", "alliance", "with", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "(", "1384–1415", ")", ",", "the", "Karmapa", "of", "the", "Karma", "Kagyu", "school", ".", "However", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "attempts", "were", "unsuccessful", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 14, 19, 24, 32, 40, 47, 51, 56, 67, 75, 78, 84, 88, 92, 102, 108, 112, 120, 130, 135, 147, 154, 159, 162, 167, 169, 174, 183, 194, 198, 209, 216, 219, 223, 227, 228, 236, 248, 250, 257, 261, 266, 273, 276, 285, 288, 295, 299, 307, 311, 316, 320, 331, 334, 338, 344, 350, 355, 360, 362, 369, 375, 380, 384, 396, 406, 413, 416, 420, 433, 436, 440, 445, 451, 456, 464, 470, 473, 490, 493, 500, 511, 513, 516, 522, 525, 534, 538, 545, 558, 561, 565, 573, 580, 587, 594, 599, 600, 603, 612, 614, 618, 622, 632, 641, 648, 656, 663, 664, 673, 675, 678, 682, 688, 695, 698, 706, 714, 716, 720, 727, 735, 736, 739, 748, 750, 755, 757, 767, 774, 777, 783, 785, 793, 797, 807, 816, 821, 828, 835, 836, 845, 846, 848, 852, 860, 863, 867, 873, 879, 885, 887, 894, 896, 900, 907, 914, 917, 926, 931, 943 ] }
dd311e15eeaa49d69b2db6eff92f138d
During what years did the Mongol leader Kublai Khan rule?
{ "tokens": [ "During", "what", "years", "did", "the", "Mongol", "leader", "Kublai", "Khan", "rule", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 12, 18, 22, 26, 33, 40, 47, 52, 56 ] }
{ "text": [ "1402–1424" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 739 ], "end": [ 747 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 125 ], "end": [ 125 ] } ] }
[ "1402–1424" ]
SQuAD
Some scholars note that Tibetan leaders during the Ming frequently engaged in civil war and conducted their own foreign diplomacy with neighboring states such as Nepal. Some scholars underscore the commercial aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship, noting the Ming dynasty's shortage of horses for warfare and thus the importance of the horse trade with Tibet. Others argue that the significant religious nature of the relationship of the Ming court with Tibetan lamas is underrepresented in modern scholarship. In hopes of reviving the unique relationship of the earlier Mongol leader Kublai Khan (r. 1260–1294) and his spiritual superior Drogön Chögyal Phagpa (1235–1280) of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism, the Yongle Emperor (r. 1402–1424) made a concerted effort to build a secular and religious alliance with Deshin Shekpa (1384–1415), the Karmapa of the Karma Kagyu school. However, the Yongle Emperor's attempts were unsuccessful.
{ "tokens": [ "Some", "scholars", "note", "that", "Tibetan", "leaders", "during", "the", "Ming", "frequently", "engaged", "in", "civil", "war", "and", "conducted", "their", "own", "foreign", "diplomacy", "with", "neighboring", "states", "such", "as", "Nepal", ".", "Some", "scholars", "underscore", "the", "commercial", "aspect", "of", "the", "Ming", "-", "Tibetan", "relationship", ",", "noting", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "'s", "shortage", "of", "horses", "for", "warfare", "and", "thus", "the", "importance", "of", "the", "horse", "trade", "with", "Tibet", ".", "Others", "argue", "that", "the", "significant", "religious", "nature", "of", "the", "relationship", "of", "the", "Ming", "court", "with", "Tibetan", "lamas", "is", "underrepresented", "in", "modern", "scholarship", ".", "In", "hopes", "of", "reviving", "the", "unique", "relationship", "of", "the", "earlier", "Mongol", "leader", "Kublai", "Khan", "(", "r.", "1260–1294", ")", "and", "his", "spiritual", "superior", "Drogön", "Chögyal", "Phagpa", "(", "1235–1280", ")", "of", "the", "Sakya", "school", "of", "Tibetan", "Buddhism", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1402–1424", ")", "made", "a", "concerted", "effort", "to", "build", "a", "secular", "and", "religious", "alliance", "with", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "(", "1384–1415", ")", ",", "the", "Karmapa", "of", "the", "Karma", "Kagyu", "school", ".", "However", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "attempts", "were", "unsuccessful", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 14, 19, 24, 32, 40, 47, 51, 56, 67, 75, 78, 84, 88, 92, 102, 108, 112, 120, 130, 135, 147, 154, 159, 162, 167, 169, 174, 183, 194, 198, 209, 216, 219, 223, 227, 228, 236, 248, 250, 257, 261, 266, 273, 276, 285, 288, 295, 299, 307, 311, 316, 320, 331, 334, 338, 344, 350, 355, 360, 362, 369, 375, 380, 384, 396, 406, 413, 416, 420, 433, 436, 440, 445, 451, 456, 464, 470, 473, 490, 493, 500, 511, 513, 516, 522, 525, 534, 538, 545, 558, 561, 565, 573, 580, 587, 594, 599, 600, 603, 612, 614, 618, 622, 632, 641, 648, 656, 663, 664, 673, 675, 678, 682, 688, 695, 698, 706, 714, 716, 720, 727, 735, 736, 739, 748, 750, 755, 757, 767, 774, 777, 783, 785, 793, 797, 807, 816, 821, 828, 835, 836, 845, 846, 848, 852, 860, 863, 867, 873, 879, 885, 887, 894, 896, 900, 907, 914, 917, 926, 931, 943 ] }
911ab99b35e74aabb1dcb147a069d053
Who did the Yongle Emperor try to build a religious alliance with?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "did", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "try", "to", "build", "a", "religious", "alliance", "with", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 19, 27, 31, 34, 40, 42, 52, 61, 65 ] }
{ "text": [ "Deshin Shekpa" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 821 ], "end": [ 833 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 139 ], "end": [ 140 ] } ] }
[ "Deshin Shekpa" ]
SQuAD
Some scholars note that Tibetan leaders during the Ming frequently engaged in civil war and conducted their own foreign diplomacy with neighboring states such as Nepal. Some scholars underscore the commercial aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship, noting the Ming dynasty's shortage of horses for warfare and thus the importance of the horse trade with Tibet. Others argue that the significant religious nature of the relationship of the Ming court with Tibetan lamas is underrepresented in modern scholarship. In hopes of reviving the unique relationship of the earlier Mongol leader Kublai Khan (r. 1260–1294) and his spiritual superior Drogön Chögyal Phagpa (1235–1280) of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism, the Yongle Emperor (r. 1402–1424) made a concerted effort to build a secular and religious alliance with Deshin Shekpa (1384–1415), the Karmapa of the Karma Kagyu school. However, the Yongle Emperor's attempts were unsuccessful.
{ "tokens": [ "Some", "scholars", "note", "that", "Tibetan", "leaders", "during", "the", "Ming", "frequently", "engaged", "in", "civil", "war", "and", "conducted", "their", "own", "foreign", "diplomacy", "with", "neighboring", "states", "such", "as", "Nepal", ".", "Some", "scholars", "underscore", "the", "commercial", "aspect", "of", "the", "Ming", "-", "Tibetan", "relationship", ",", "noting", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "'s", "shortage", "of", "horses", "for", "warfare", "and", "thus", "the", "importance", "of", "the", "horse", "trade", "with", "Tibet", ".", "Others", "argue", "that", "the", "significant", "religious", "nature", "of", "the", "relationship", "of", "the", "Ming", "court", "with", "Tibetan", "lamas", "is", "underrepresented", "in", "modern", "scholarship", ".", "In", "hopes", "of", "reviving", "the", "unique", "relationship", "of", "the", "earlier", "Mongol", "leader", "Kublai", "Khan", "(", "r.", "1260–1294", ")", "and", "his", "spiritual", "superior", "Drogön", "Chögyal", "Phagpa", "(", "1235–1280", ")", "of", "the", "Sakya", "school", "of", "Tibetan", "Buddhism", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1402–1424", ")", "made", "a", "concerted", "effort", "to", "build", "a", "secular", "and", "religious", "alliance", "with", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "(", "1384–1415", ")", ",", "the", "Karmapa", "of", "the", "Karma", "Kagyu", "school", ".", "However", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "attempts", "were", "unsuccessful", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 14, 19, 24, 32, 40, 47, 51, 56, 67, 75, 78, 84, 88, 92, 102, 108, 112, 120, 130, 135, 147, 154, 159, 162, 167, 169, 174, 183, 194, 198, 209, 216, 219, 223, 227, 228, 236, 248, 250, 257, 261, 266, 273, 276, 285, 288, 295, 299, 307, 311, 316, 320, 331, 334, 338, 344, 350, 355, 360, 362, 369, 375, 380, 384, 396, 406, 413, 416, 420, 433, 436, 440, 445, 451, 456, 464, 470, 473, 490, 493, 500, 511, 513, 516, 522, 525, 534, 538, 545, 558, 561, 565, 573, 580, 587, 594, 599, 600, 603, 612, 614, 618, 622, 632, 641, 648, 656, 663, 664, 673, 675, 678, 682, 688, 695, 698, 706, 714, 716, 720, 727, 735, 736, 739, 748, 750, 755, 757, 767, 774, 777, 783, 785, 793, 797, 807, 816, 821, 828, 835, 836, 845, 846, 848, 852, 860, 863, 867, 873, 879, 885, 887, 894, 896, 900, 907, 914, 917, 926, 931, 943 ] }
d14cef61c2ee42aa8780e431f12da6c8
Deshin Shekpa was the head of what school?
{ "tokens": [ "Deshin", "Shekpa", "was", "the", "head", "of", "what", "school", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 14, 18, 22, 27, 30, 35, 41 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Karma Kagyu school" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 863 ], "end": [ 884 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 148 ], "end": [ 151 ] } ] }
[ "the Karma Kagyu school" ]
SQuAD
Some scholars note that Tibetan leaders during the Ming frequently engaged in civil war and conducted their own foreign diplomacy with neighboring states such as Nepal. Some scholars underscore the commercial aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship, noting the Ming dynasty's shortage of horses for warfare and thus the importance of the horse trade with Tibet. Others argue that the significant religious nature of the relationship of the Ming court with Tibetan lamas is underrepresented in modern scholarship. In hopes of reviving the unique relationship of the earlier Mongol leader Kublai Khan (r. 1260–1294) and his spiritual superior Drogön Chögyal Phagpa (1235–1280) of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism, the Yongle Emperor (r. 1402–1424) made a concerted effort to build a secular and religious alliance with Deshin Shekpa (1384–1415), the Karmapa of the Karma Kagyu school. However, the Yongle Emperor's attempts were unsuccessful.
{ "tokens": [ "Some", "scholars", "note", "that", "Tibetan", "leaders", "during", "the", "Ming", "frequently", "engaged", "in", "civil", "war", "and", "conducted", "their", "own", "foreign", "diplomacy", "with", "neighboring", "states", "such", "as", "Nepal", ".", "Some", "scholars", "underscore", "the", "commercial", "aspect", "of", "the", "Ming", "-", "Tibetan", "relationship", ",", "noting", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "'s", "shortage", "of", "horses", "for", "warfare", "and", "thus", "the", "importance", "of", "the", "horse", "trade", "with", "Tibet", ".", "Others", "argue", "that", "the", "significant", "religious", "nature", "of", "the", "relationship", "of", "the", "Ming", "court", "with", "Tibetan", "lamas", "is", "underrepresented", "in", "modern", "scholarship", ".", "In", "hopes", "of", "reviving", "the", "unique", "relationship", "of", "the", "earlier", "Mongol", "leader", "Kublai", "Khan", "(", "r.", "1260–1294", ")", "and", "his", "spiritual", "superior", "Drogön", "Chögyal", "Phagpa", "(", "1235–1280", ")", "of", "the", "Sakya", "school", "of", "Tibetan", "Buddhism", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1402–1424", ")", "made", "a", "concerted", "effort", "to", "build", "a", "secular", "and", "religious", "alliance", "with", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "(", "1384–1415", ")", ",", "the", "Karmapa", "of", "the", "Karma", "Kagyu", "school", ".", "However", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "attempts", "were", "unsuccessful", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 14, 19, 24, 32, 40, 47, 51, 56, 67, 75, 78, 84, 88, 92, 102, 108, 112, 120, 130, 135, 147, 154, 159, 162, 167, 169, 174, 183, 194, 198, 209, 216, 219, 223, 227, 228, 236, 248, 250, 257, 261, 266, 273, 276, 285, 288, 295, 299, 307, 311, 316, 320, 331, 334, 338, 344, 350, 355, 360, 362, 369, 375, 380, 384, 396, 406, 413, 416, 420, 433, 436, 440, 445, 451, 456, 464, 470, 473, 490, 493, 500, 511, 513, 516, 522, 525, 534, 538, 545, 558, 561, 565, 573, 580, 587, 594, 599, 600, 603, 612, 614, 618, 622, 632, 641, 648, 656, 663, 664, 673, 675, 678, 682, 688, 695, 698, 706, 714, 716, 720, 727, 735, 736, 739, 748, 750, 755, 757, 767, 774, 777, 783, 785, 793, 797, 807, 816, 821, 828, 835, 836, 845, 846, 848, 852, 860, 863, 867, 873, 879, 885, 887, 894, 896, 900, 907, 914, 917, 926, 931, 943 ] }
f91176919de54f4194dcd2d243d684ef
The Tibetan leaders had a diplomacy with what neighboring state?
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Tibetan", "leaders", "had", "a", "diplomacy", "with", "what", "neighboring", "state", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 12, 20, 24, 26, 36, 41, 46, 58, 63 ] }
{ "text": [ "Nepal" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 162 ], "end": [ 166 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 25 ], "end": [ 25 ] } ] }
[ "Nepal" ]
SQuAD
The official position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China is that the Ming implemented a policy of managing Tibet according to conventions and customs, granting titles and setting up administrative organs over Tibet. The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic states that the Ming dynasty's Ü-Tsang Commanding Office governed most areas of Tibet. It also states that while the Ming abolished the policy council set up by the Mongol Yuan to manage local affairs in Tibet and the Mongol system of Imperial Tutors to govern religious affairs, the Ming adopted a policy of bestowing titles upon religious leaders who had submitted to the Ming dynasty. For example, an edict of the Hongwu Emperor in 1373 appointed the Tibetan leader Choskunskyabs as the General of the Ngari Military and Civil Wanhu Office, stating:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "official", "position", "of", "the", "Ministry", "of", "Foreign", "Affairs", "of", "the", "People", "'s", "Republic", "of", "China", "is", "that", "the", "Ming", "implemented", "a", "policy", "of", "managing", "Tibet", "according", "to", "conventions", "and", "customs", ",", "granting", "titles", "and", "setting", "up", "administrative", "organs", "over", "Tibet", ".", "The", "State", "Council", "Information", "Office", "of", "the", "People", "'s", "Republic", "states", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "'s", "Ü", "-", "Tsang", "Commanding", "Office", "governed", "most", "areas", "of", "Tibet", ".", "It", "also", "states", "that", "while", "the", "Ming", "abolished", "the", "policy", "council", "set", "up", "by", "the", "Mongol", "Yuan", "to", "manage", "local", "affairs", "in", "Tibet", "and", "the", "Mongol", "system", "of", "Imperial", "Tutors", "to", "govern", "religious", "affairs", ",", "the", "Ming", "adopted", "a", "policy", "of", "bestowing", "titles", "upon", "religious", "leaders", "who", "had", "submitted", "to", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", ".", "For", "example", ",", "an", "edict", "of", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "in", "1373", "appointed", "the", "Tibetan", "leader", "Choskunskyabs", "as", "the", "General", "of", "the", "Ngari", "Military", "and", "Civil", "Wanhu", "Office", ",", "stating", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 13, 22, 25, 29, 38, 41, 49, 57, 60, 64, 70, 73, 82, 85, 91, 94, 99, 103, 108, 120, 122, 129, 132, 141, 147, 157, 160, 172, 176, 183, 185, 194, 201, 205, 213, 216, 231, 238, 243, 248, 250, 254, 260, 268, 280, 287, 290, 294, 300, 303, 312, 319, 324, 328, 333, 340, 343, 344, 345, 351, 362, 369, 378, 383, 389, 392, 397, 399, 402, 407, 414, 419, 425, 429, 434, 444, 448, 455, 463, 467, 470, 473, 477, 484, 489, 492, 499, 505, 513, 516, 522, 526, 530, 537, 544, 547, 556, 563, 566, 573, 583, 590, 592, 596, 601, 609, 611, 618, 621, 631, 638, 643, 653, 661, 665, 669, 679, 682, 686, 691, 698, 700, 704, 711, 713, 716, 722, 725, 729, 736, 744, 747, 752, 762, 766, 774, 781, 795, 798, 802, 810, 813, 817, 823, 832, 836, 842, 848, 854, 856, 863 ] }
7f58d13135da48e38a499cd5b05b4813
Who abolished the policy council?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "abolished", "the", "policy", "council", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 14, 18, 25, 32 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Ming" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 99 ], "end": [ 106 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 18 ], "end": [ 19 ] } ] }
[ "the Ming" ]
SQuAD
The official position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China is that the Ming implemented a policy of managing Tibet according to conventions and customs, granting titles and setting up administrative organs over Tibet. The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic states that the Ming dynasty's Ü-Tsang Commanding Office governed most areas of Tibet. It also states that while the Ming abolished the policy council set up by the Mongol Yuan to manage local affairs in Tibet and the Mongol system of Imperial Tutors to govern religious affairs, the Ming adopted a policy of bestowing titles upon religious leaders who had submitted to the Ming dynasty. For example, an edict of the Hongwu Emperor in 1373 appointed the Tibetan leader Choskunskyabs as the General of the Ngari Military and Civil Wanhu Office, stating:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "official", "position", "of", "the", "Ministry", "of", "Foreign", "Affairs", "of", "the", "People", "'s", "Republic", "of", "China", "is", "that", "the", "Ming", "implemented", "a", "policy", "of", "managing", "Tibet", "according", "to", "conventions", "and", "customs", ",", "granting", "titles", "and", "setting", "up", "administrative", "organs", "over", "Tibet", ".", "The", "State", "Council", "Information", "Office", "of", "the", "People", "'s", "Republic", "states", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "'s", "Ü", "-", "Tsang", "Commanding", "Office", "governed", "most", "areas", "of", "Tibet", ".", "It", "also", "states", "that", "while", "the", "Ming", "abolished", "the", "policy", "council", "set", "up", "by", "the", "Mongol", "Yuan", "to", "manage", "local", "affairs", "in", "Tibet", "and", "the", "Mongol", "system", "of", "Imperial", "Tutors", "to", "govern", "religious", "affairs", ",", "the", "Ming", "adopted", "a", "policy", "of", "bestowing", "titles", "upon", "religious", "leaders", "who", "had", "submitted", "to", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", ".", "For", "example", ",", "an", "edict", "of", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "in", "1373", "appointed", "the", "Tibetan", "leader", "Choskunskyabs", "as", "the", "General", "of", "the", "Ngari", "Military", "and", "Civil", "Wanhu", "Office", ",", "stating", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 13, 22, 25, 29, 38, 41, 49, 57, 60, 64, 70, 73, 82, 85, 91, 94, 99, 103, 108, 120, 122, 129, 132, 141, 147, 157, 160, 172, 176, 183, 185, 194, 201, 205, 213, 216, 231, 238, 243, 248, 250, 254, 260, 268, 280, 287, 290, 294, 300, 303, 312, 319, 324, 328, 333, 340, 343, 344, 345, 351, 362, 369, 378, 383, 389, 392, 397, 399, 402, 407, 414, 419, 425, 429, 434, 444, 448, 455, 463, 467, 470, 473, 477, 484, 489, 492, 499, 505, 513, 516, 522, 526, 530, 537, 544, 547, 556, 563, 566, 573, 583, 590, 592, 596, 601, 609, 611, 618, 621, 631, 638, 643, 653, 661, 665, 669, 679, 682, 686, 691, 698, 700, 704, 711, 713, 716, 722, 725, 729, 736, 744, 747, 752, 762, 766, 774, 781, 795, 798, 802, 810, 813, 817, 823, 832, 836, 842, 848, 854, 856, 863 ] }
875583470bee4464b2fb7335e7eb13b3
What was the Tibetan leader Choskunskyabs appointed as?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "was", "the", "Tibetan", "leader", " ", "Choskunskyabs", " ", "appointed", "as", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 13, 21, 28, 29, 43, 44, 54, 56 ] }
{ "text": [ "the General of the Ngari Military and Civil Wanhu Office" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 798 ], "end": [ 853 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 140 ], "end": [ 149 ] } ] }
[ "the General of the Ngari Military and Civil Wanhu Office" ]
SQuAD
The official position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China is that the Ming implemented a policy of managing Tibet according to conventions and customs, granting titles and setting up administrative organs over Tibet. The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic states that the Ming dynasty's Ü-Tsang Commanding Office governed most areas of Tibet. It also states that while the Ming abolished the policy council set up by the Mongol Yuan to manage local affairs in Tibet and the Mongol system of Imperial Tutors to govern religious affairs, the Ming adopted a policy of bestowing titles upon religious leaders who had submitted to the Ming dynasty. For example, an edict of the Hongwu Emperor in 1373 appointed the Tibetan leader Choskunskyabs as the General of the Ngari Military and Civil Wanhu Office, stating:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "official", "position", "of", "the", "Ministry", "of", "Foreign", "Affairs", "of", "the", "People", "'s", "Republic", "of", "China", "is", "that", "the", "Ming", "implemented", "a", "policy", "of", "managing", "Tibet", "according", "to", "conventions", "and", "customs", ",", "granting", "titles", "and", "setting", "up", "administrative", "organs", "over", "Tibet", ".", "The", "State", "Council", "Information", "Office", "of", "the", "People", "'s", "Republic", "states", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "'s", "Ü", "-", "Tsang", "Commanding", "Office", "governed", "most", "areas", "of", "Tibet", ".", "It", "also", "states", "that", "while", "the", "Ming", "abolished", "the", "policy", "council", "set", "up", "by", "the", "Mongol", "Yuan", "to", "manage", "local", "affairs", "in", "Tibet", "and", "the", "Mongol", "system", "of", "Imperial", "Tutors", "to", "govern", "religious", "affairs", ",", "the", "Ming", "adopted", "a", "policy", "of", "bestowing", "titles", "upon", "religious", "leaders", "who", "had", "submitted", "to", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", ".", "For", "example", ",", "an", "edict", "of", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "in", "1373", "appointed", "the", "Tibetan", "leader", "Choskunskyabs", "as", "the", "General", "of", "the", "Ngari", "Military", "and", "Civil", "Wanhu", "Office", ",", "stating", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 13, 22, 25, 29, 38, 41, 49, 57, 60, 64, 70, 73, 82, 85, 91, 94, 99, 103, 108, 120, 122, 129, 132, 141, 147, 157, 160, 172, 176, 183, 185, 194, 201, 205, 213, 216, 231, 238, 243, 248, 250, 254, 260, 268, 280, 287, 290, 294, 300, 303, 312, 319, 324, 328, 333, 340, 343, 344, 345, 351, 362, 369, 378, 383, 389, 392, 397, 399, 402, 407, 414, 419, 425, 429, 434, 444, 448, 455, 463, 467, 470, 473, 477, 484, 489, 492, 499, 505, 513, 516, 522, 526, 530, 537, 544, 547, 556, 563, 566, 573, 583, 590, 592, 596, 601, 609, 611, 618, 621, 631, 638, 643, 653, 661, 665, 669, 679, 682, 686, 691, 698, 700, 704, 711, 713, 716, 722, 725, 729, 736, 744, 747, 752, 762, 766, 774, 781, 795, 798, 802, 810, 813, 817, 823, 832, 836, 842, 848, 854, 856, 863 ] }
25b263e48466458bbd95692ac132b940
Who governed most areas of Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "governed", "most", "areas", "of", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 13, 18, 24, 27, 32 ] }
{ "text": [ "Ming dynasty's Ü-Tsang Commanding Office" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 328 ], "end": [ 367 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 55 ], "end": [ 62 ] } ] }
[ "Ming dynasty's Ü-Tsang Commanding Office" ]
SQuAD
Wang and Nyima state that after the official title "Education Minister" was granted to Tai Situ Changchub Gyaltsen (1302–1364) by the Yuan court, this title appeared frequently with his name in various Tibetan texts, while his Tibetan title "Degsi" (sic properly sde-srid or desi) is seldom mentioned. Wang and Nyima take this to mean that "even in the later period of the Yuan dynasty, the Yuan imperial court and the Phagmodrupa Dynasty maintained a Central-local government relation." The Tai Situpa is even supposed to have written in his will: "In the past I received loving care from the emperor in the east. If the emperor continues to care for us, please follow his edicts and the imperial envoy should be well received."
{ "tokens": [ "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "state", "that", "after", "the", "official", "title", "\"", "Education", "Minister", "\"", "was", "granted", "to", "Tai", "Situ", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "(", "1302–1364", ")", "by", "the", "Yuan", "court", ",", "this", "title", "appeared", "frequently", "with", "his", "name", "in", "various", "Tibetan", "texts", ",", "while", "his", "Tibetan", "title", "\"", "Degsi", "\"", "(", "sic", "properly", "sde", "-", "srid", "or", "desi", ")", "is", "seldom", "mentioned", ".", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "take", "this", "to", "mean", "that", "\"", "even", "in", "the", "later", "period", "of", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", ",", "the", "Yuan", "imperial", "court", "and", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "Dynasty", "maintained", "a", "Central", "-", "local", "government", "relation", ".", "\"", "The", "Tai", "Situpa", "is", "even", "supposed", "to", "have", "written", "in", "his", "will", ":", "\"", "In", "the", "past", "I", "received", "loving", "care", "from", "the", "emperor", "in", "the", "east", ".", "If", "the", "emperor", "continues", "to", "care", "for", "us", ",", "please", "follow", "his", "edicts", "and", "the", "imperial", "envoy", "should", "be", "well", "received", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 15, 21, 26, 32, 36, 45, 51, 52, 62, 70, 72, 76, 84, 87, 91, 96, 106, 115, 116, 125, 127, 130, 134, 139, 144, 146, 151, 157, 166, 177, 182, 186, 191, 194, 202, 210, 215, 217, 223, 227, 235, 241, 242, 247, 249, 250, 254, 263, 266, 267, 272, 275, 279, 281, 284, 291, 300, 302, 307, 311, 317, 322, 327, 330, 335, 340, 341, 346, 349, 353, 359, 366, 369, 373, 378, 385, 387, 391, 396, 405, 411, 415, 419, 431, 439, 450, 452, 459, 460, 466, 477, 485, 486, 488, 492, 496, 503, 506, 511, 520, 523, 528, 536, 539, 543, 547, 549, 550, 553, 557, 562, 564, 573, 580, 585, 590, 594, 602, 605, 609, 613, 615, 618, 622, 630, 640, 643, 648, 652, 654, 656, 663, 670, 674, 681, 685, 689, 698, 704, 711, 714, 719, 727, 728 ] }
73dcc074dba04cd7836cd4ac5bcab3c8
What title was given by the Yuan court to Tai Situ Changchub Gyaltsen ?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "title", "was", "given", "by", "the", "Yuan", "court", "to", "Tai", "Situ", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 11, 15, 21, 24, 28, 33, 39, 42, 46, 51, 61, 70 ] }
{ "text": [ "Education Minister" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 52 ], "end": [ 69 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 10 ], "end": [ 11 ] } ] }
[ "Education Minister" ]
SQuAD
Wang and Nyima state that after the official title "Education Minister" was granted to Tai Situ Changchub Gyaltsen (1302–1364) by the Yuan court, this title appeared frequently with his name in various Tibetan texts, while his Tibetan title "Degsi" (sic properly sde-srid or desi) is seldom mentioned. Wang and Nyima take this to mean that "even in the later period of the Yuan dynasty, the Yuan imperial court and the Phagmodrupa Dynasty maintained a Central-local government relation." The Tai Situpa is even supposed to have written in his will: "In the past I received loving care from the emperor in the east. If the emperor continues to care for us, please follow his edicts and the imperial envoy should be well received."
{ "tokens": [ "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "state", "that", "after", "the", "official", "title", "\"", "Education", "Minister", "\"", "was", "granted", "to", "Tai", "Situ", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "(", "1302–1364", ")", "by", "the", "Yuan", "court", ",", "this", "title", "appeared", "frequently", "with", "his", "name", "in", "various", "Tibetan", "texts", ",", "while", "his", "Tibetan", "title", "\"", "Degsi", "\"", "(", "sic", "properly", "sde", "-", "srid", "or", "desi", ")", "is", "seldom", "mentioned", ".", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "take", "this", "to", "mean", "that", "\"", "even", "in", "the", "later", "period", "of", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", ",", "the", "Yuan", "imperial", "court", "and", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "Dynasty", "maintained", "a", "Central", "-", "local", "government", "relation", ".", "\"", "The", "Tai", "Situpa", "is", "even", "supposed", "to", "have", "written", "in", "his", "will", ":", "\"", "In", "the", "past", "I", "received", "loving", "care", "from", "the", "emperor", "in", "the", "east", ".", "If", "the", "emperor", "continues", "to", "care", "for", "us", ",", "please", "follow", "his", "edicts", "and", "the", "imperial", "envoy", "should", "be", "well", "received", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 15, 21, 26, 32, 36, 45, 51, 52, 62, 70, 72, 76, 84, 87, 91, 96, 106, 115, 116, 125, 127, 130, 134, 139, 144, 146, 151, 157, 166, 177, 182, 186, 191, 194, 202, 210, 215, 217, 223, 227, 235, 241, 242, 247, 249, 250, 254, 263, 266, 267, 272, 275, 279, 281, 284, 291, 300, 302, 307, 311, 317, 322, 327, 330, 335, 340, 341, 346, 349, 353, 359, 366, 369, 373, 378, 385, 387, 391, 396, 405, 411, 415, 419, 431, 439, 450, 452, 459, 460, 466, 477, 485, 486, 488, 492, 496, 503, 506, 511, 520, 523, 528, 536, 539, 543, 547, 549, 550, 553, 557, 562, 564, 573, 580, 585, 590, 594, 602, 605, 609, 613, 615, 618, 622, 630, 640, 643, 648, 652, 654, 656, 663, 670, 674, 681, 685, 689, 698, 704, 711, 714, 719, 727, 728 ] }
052bfaa8859b4cb6b4396e9bcee022fe
What Tibetan title was hardly ever mentioned when referring to Tai Situ Changchub Gyaltsen?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "Tibetan", "title", "was", "hardly", "ever", "mentioned", "when", "referring", "to", "Tai", "Situ", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 13, 19, 23, 30, 35, 45, 50, 60, 63, 67, 72, 82, 90 ] }
{ "text": [ "Degsi" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 242 ], "end": [ 246 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 45 ], "end": [ 45 ] } ] }
[ "Degsi" ]
SQuAD
Wang and Nyima state that after the official title "Education Minister" was granted to Tai Situ Changchub Gyaltsen (1302–1364) by the Yuan court, this title appeared frequently with his name in various Tibetan texts, while his Tibetan title "Degsi" (sic properly sde-srid or desi) is seldom mentioned. Wang and Nyima take this to mean that "even in the later period of the Yuan dynasty, the Yuan imperial court and the Phagmodrupa Dynasty maintained a Central-local government relation." The Tai Situpa is even supposed to have written in his will: "In the past I received loving care from the emperor in the east. If the emperor continues to care for us, please follow his edicts and the imperial envoy should be well received."
{ "tokens": [ "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "state", "that", "after", "the", "official", "title", "\"", "Education", "Minister", "\"", "was", "granted", "to", "Tai", "Situ", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "(", "1302–1364", ")", "by", "the", "Yuan", "court", ",", "this", "title", "appeared", "frequently", "with", "his", "name", "in", "various", "Tibetan", "texts", ",", "while", "his", "Tibetan", "title", "\"", "Degsi", "\"", "(", "sic", "properly", "sde", "-", "srid", "or", "desi", ")", "is", "seldom", "mentioned", ".", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "take", "this", "to", "mean", "that", "\"", "even", "in", "the", "later", "period", "of", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", ",", "the", "Yuan", "imperial", "court", "and", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "Dynasty", "maintained", "a", "Central", "-", "local", "government", "relation", ".", "\"", "The", "Tai", "Situpa", "is", "even", "supposed", "to", "have", "written", "in", "his", "will", ":", "\"", "In", "the", "past", "I", "received", "loving", "care", "from", "the", "emperor", "in", "the", "east", ".", "If", "the", "emperor", "continues", "to", "care", "for", "us", ",", "please", "follow", "his", "edicts", "and", "the", "imperial", "envoy", "should", "be", "well", "received", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 15, 21, 26, 32, 36, 45, 51, 52, 62, 70, 72, 76, 84, 87, 91, 96, 106, 115, 116, 125, 127, 130, 134, 139, 144, 146, 151, 157, 166, 177, 182, 186, 191, 194, 202, 210, 215, 217, 223, 227, 235, 241, 242, 247, 249, 250, 254, 263, 266, 267, 272, 275, 279, 281, 284, 291, 300, 302, 307, 311, 317, 322, 327, 330, 335, 340, 341, 346, 349, 353, 359, 366, 369, 373, 378, 385, 387, 391, 396, 405, 411, 415, 419, 431, 439, 450, 452, 459, 460, 466, 477, 485, 486, 488, 492, 496, 503, 506, 511, 520, 523, 528, 536, 539, 543, 547, 549, 550, 553, 557, 562, 564, 573, 580, 585, 590, 594, 602, 605, 609, 613, 615, 618, 622, 630, 640, 643, 648, 652, 654, 656, 663, 670, 674, 681, 685, 689, 698, 704, 711, 714, 719, 727, 728 ] }
072db7c110fd4b2eb8edb1851eb05680
What dynasty kept a Central-local government relation with the Yuan imperial court?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "dynasty", "kept", "a", "Central", "-", "local", "government", "relation", "with", "the", "Yuan", "imperial", "court", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 13, 18, 20, 27, 28, 34, 45, 54, 59, 63, 68, 77, 82 ] }
{ "text": [ "Phagmodrupa Dynasty" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 419 ], "end": [ 437 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 85 ], "end": [ 86 ] } ] }
[ "Phagmodrupa Dynasty" ]
SQuAD
Wang and Nyima state that after the official title "Education Minister" was granted to Tai Situ Changchub Gyaltsen (1302–1364) by the Yuan court, this title appeared frequently with his name in various Tibetan texts, while his Tibetan title "Degsi" (sic properly sde-srid or desi) is seldom mentioned. Wang and Nyima take this to mean that "even in the later period of the Yuan dynasty, the Yuan imperial court and the Phagmodrupa Dynasty maintained a Central-local government relation." The Tai Situpa is even supposed to have written in his will: "In the past I received loving care from the emperor in the east. If the emperor continues to care for us, please follow his edicts and the imperial envoy should be well received."
{ "tokens": [ "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "state", "that", "after", "the", "official", "title", "\"", "Education", "Minister", "\"", "was", "granted", "to", "Tai", "Situ", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "(", "1302–1364", ")", "by", "the", "Yuan", "court", ",", "this", "title", "appeared", "frequently", "with", "his", "name", "in", "various", "Tibetan", "texts", ",", "while", "his", "Tibetan", "title", "\"", "Degsi", "\"", "(", "sic", "properly", "sde", "-", "srid", "or", "desi", ")", "is", "seldom", "mentioned", ".", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "take", "this", "to", "mean", "that", "\"", "even", "in", "the", "later", "period", "of", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", ",", "the", "Yuan", "imperial", "court", "and", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "Dynasty", "maintained", "a", "Central", "-", "local", "government", "relation", ".", "\"", "The", "Tai", "Situpa", "is", "even", "supposed", "to", "have", "written", "in", "his", "will", ":", "\"", "In", "the", "past", "I", "received", "loving", "care", "from", "the", "emperor", "in", "the", "east", ".", "If", "the", "emperor", "continues", "to", "care", "for", "us", ",", "please", "follow", "his", "edicts", "and", "the", "imperial", "envoy", "should", "be", "well", "received", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 15, 21, 26, 32, 36, 45, 51, 52, 62, 70, 72, 76, 84, 87, 91, 96, 106, 115, 116, 125, 127, 130, 134, 139, 144, 146, 151, 157, 166, 177, 182, 186, 191, 194, 202, 210, 215, 217, 223, 227, 235, 241, 242, 247, 249, 250, 254, 263, 266, 267, 272, 275, 279, 281, 284, 291, 300, 302, 307, 311, 317, 322, 327, 330, 335, 340, 341, 346, 349, 353, 359, 366, 369, 373, 378, 385, 387, 391, 396, 405, 411, 415, 419, 431, 439, 450, 452, 459, 460, 466, 477, 485, 486, 488, 492, 496, 503, 506, 511, 520, 523, 528, 536, 539, 543, 547, 549, 550, 553, 557, 562, 564, 573, 580, 585, 590, 594, 602, 605, 609, 613, 615, 618, 622, 630, 640, 643, 648, 652, 654, 656, 663, 670, 674, 681, 685, 689, 698, 704, 711, 714, 719, 727, 728 ] }
3515041faaa74561b6900ed23269163b
What two people claim the title of Education Minister was often seen next to Tai Situ Changchub Gyaltsen's name in Tibetan texts?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "two", "people", "claim", "the", "title", "of", "Education", "Minister", "was", "often", "seen", "next", "to", "Tai", "Situ", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "'s", "name", "in", "Tibetan", "texts", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 16, 22, 26, 32, 35, 45, 54, 58, 64, 69, 74, 77, 81, 86, 96, 104, 107, 112, 115, 123, 128 ] }
{ "text": [ "Wang and Nyima" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 302, 0 ], "end": [ 315, 13 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 60, 0 ], "end": [ 62, 2 ] } ] }
[ "Wang and Nyima" ]
SQuAD
Wang and Nyima state that after the official title "Education Minister" was granted to Tai Situ Changchub Gyaltsen (1302–1364) by the Yuan court, this title appeared frequently with his name in various Tibetan texts, while his Tibetan title "Degsi" (sic properly sde-srid or desi) is seldom mentioned. Wang and Nyima take this to mean that "even in the later period of the Yuan dynasty, the Yuan imperial court and the Phagmodrupa Dynasty maintained a Central-local government relation." The Tai Situpa is even supposed to have written in his will: "In the past I received loving care from the emperor in the east. If the emperor continues to care for us, please follow his edicts and the imperial envoy should be well received."
{ "tokens": [ "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "state", "that", "after", "the", "official", "title", "\"", "Education", "Minister", "\"", "was", "granted", "to", "Tai", "Situ", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "(", "1302–1364", ")", "by", "the", "Yuan", "court", ",", "this", "title", "appeared", "frequently", "with", "his", "name", "in", "various", "Tibetan", "texts", ",", "while", "his", "Tibetan", "title", "\"", "Degsi", "\"", "(", "sic", "properly", "sde", "-", "srid", "or", "desi", ")", "is", "seldom", "mentioned", ".", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "take", "this", "to", "mean", "that", "\"", "even", "in", "the", "later", "period", "of", "the", "Yuan", "dynasty", ",", "the", "Yuan", "imperial", "court", "and", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "Dynasty", "maintained", "a", "Central", "-", "local", "government", "relation", ".", "\"", "The", "Tai", "Situpa", "is", "even", "supposed", "to", "have", "written", "in", "his", "will", ":", "\"", "In", "the", "past", "I", "received", "loving", "care", "from", "the", "emperor", "in", "the", "east", ".", "If", "the", "emperor", "continues", "to", "care", "for", "us", ",", "please", "follow", "his", "edicts", "and", "the", "imperial", "envoy", "should", "be", "well", "received", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 15, 21, 26, 32, 36, 45, 51, 52, 62, 70, 72, 76, 84, 87, 91, 96, 106, 115, 116, 125, 127, 130, 134, 139, 144, 146, 151, 157, 166, 177, 182, 186, 191, 194, 202, 210, 215, 217, 223, 227, 235, 241, 242, 247, 249, 250, 254, 263, 266, 267, 272, 275, 279, 281, 284, 291, 300, 302, 307, 311, 317, 322, 327, 330, 335, 340, 341, 346, 349, 353, 359, 366, 369, 373, 378, 385, 387, 391, 396, 405, 411, 415, 419, 431, 439, 450, 452, 459, 460, 466, 477, 485, 486, 488, 492, 496, 503, 506, 511, 520, 523, 528, 536, 539, 543, 547, 549, 550, 553, 557, 562, 564, 573, 580, 585, 590, 594, 602, 605, 609, 613, 615, 618, 622, 630, 640, 643, 648, 652, 654, 656, 663, 670, 674, 681, 685, 689, 698, 704, 711, 714, 719, 727, 728 ] }
eb2951525d914f7eb94721c00a1130c8
Who wrote in their will that they received loving care from the emperor in the east?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "wrote", "in", "their", "will", "that", "they", "received", "loving", "care", "from", "the", "emperor", "in", "the", "east", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 10, 13, 19, 24, 29, 34, 43, 50, 55, 60, 64, 72, 75, 79, 83 ] }
{ "text": [ "The Tai Situpa" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 488 ], "end": [ 501 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 96 ], "end": [ 98 ] } ] }
[ "The Tai Situpa" ]
SQuAD
In order to seek out the Karmapa, the Yongle Emperor dispatched his eunuch Hou Xian and the Buddhist monk Zhi Guang (d. 1435) to Tibet. Traveling to Lhasa either through Qinghai or via the Silk Road to Khotan, Hou Xian and Zhi Guang did not return to Nanjing until 1407.
{ "tokens": [ "In", "order", "to", "seek", "out", "the", "Karmapa", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "dispatched", "his", "eunuch", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "the", "Buddhist", "monk", "Zhi", "Guang", "(", "d.", "1435", ")", "to", "Tibet", ".", "Traveling", "to", "Lhasa", "either", "through", "Qinghai", "or", "via", "the", "Silk", "Road", "to", "Khotan", ",", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "Zhi", "Guang", "did", "not", "return", "to", "Nanjing", "until", "1407", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 9, 12, 17, 21, 25, 32, 34, 38, 45, 53, 64, 68, 75, 79, 84, 88, 92, 101, 106, 110, 116, 117, 120, 124, 126, 129, 134, 136, 146, 149, 155, 162, 170, 178, 181, 185, 189, 194, 199, 202, 208, 210, 214, 219, 223, 227, 233, 237, 241, 248, 251, 259, 265, 269 ] }
3f5b5dab751546a78306b7d225a5c9e0
Who did the Yongle Emperor send to Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "did", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "send", "to", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 19, 27, 32, 35, 40 ] }
{ "text": [ "Hou Xian and the Buddhist monk Zhi Guang" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 75 ], "end": [ 114 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 14 ], "end": [ 21 ] } ] }
[ "Hou Xian and the Buddhist monk Zhi Guang" ]
SQuAD
In order to seek out the Karmapa, the Yongle Emperor dispatched his eunuch Hou Xian and the Buddhist monk Zhi Guang (d. 1435) to Tibet. Traveling to Lhasa either through Qinghai or via the Silk Road to Khotan, Hou Xian and Zhi Guang did not return to Nanjing until 1407.
{ "tokens": [ "In", "order", "to", "seek", "out", "the", "Karmapa", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "dispatched", "his", "eunuch", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "the", "Buddhist", "monk", "Zhi", "Guang", "(", "d.", "1435", ")", "to", "Tibet", ".", "Traveling", "to", "Lhasa", "either", "through", "Qinghai", "or", "via", "the", "Silk", "Road", "to", "Khotan", ",", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "Zhi", "Guang", "did", "not", "return", "to", "Nanjing", "until", "1407", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 9, 12, 17, 21, 25, 32, 34, 38, 45, 53, 64, 68, 75, 79, 84, 88, 92, 101, 106, 110, 116, 117, 120, 124, 126, 129, 134, 136, 146, 149, 155, 162, 170, 178, 181, 185, 189, 194, 199, 202, 208, 210, 214, 219, 223, 227, 233, 237, 241, 248, 251, 259, 265, 269 ] }
64b1586c596948c39000ce2de9c9dfc2
Why did the Yongle Emperor send Hou Xian and Zhi Guang to Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Why", "did", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "send", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "Zhi", "Guang", "to", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 19, 27, 32, 36, 41, 45, 49, 55, 58, 63 ] }
{ "text": [ "to seek out the Karmapa" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 9 ], "end": [ 31 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 2 ], "end": [ 6 ] } ] }
[ "to seek out the Karmapa" ]
SQuAD
In order to seek out the Karmapa, the Yongle Emperor dispatched his eunuch Hou Xian and the Buddhist monk Zhi Guang (d. 1435) to Tibet. Traveling to Lhasa either through Qinghai or via the Silk Road to Khotan, Hou Xian and Zhi Guang did not return to Nanjing until 1407.
{ "tokens": [ "In", "order", "to", "seek", "out", "the", "Karmapa", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "dispatched", "his", "eunuch", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "the", "Buddhist", "monk", "Zhi", "Guang", "(", "d.", "1435", ")", "to", "Tibet", ".", "Traveling", "to", "Lhasa", "either", "through", "Qinghai", "or", "via", "the", "Silk", "Road", "to", "Khotan", ",", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "Zhi", "Guang", "did", "not", "return", "to", "Nanjing", "until", "1407", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 9, 12, 17, 21, 25, 32, 34, 38, 45, 53, 64, 68, 75, 79, 84, 88, 92, 101, 106, 110, 116, 117, 120, 124, 126, 129, 134, 136, 146, 149, 155, 162, 170, 178, 181, 185, 189, 194, 199, 202, 208, 210, 214, 219, 223, 227, 233, 237, 241, 248, 251, 259, 265, 269 ] }
1f203eb125764d75b38b9c2c058c73e2
When did Hou Xian and Zhi Guang return to Nanjing?
{ "tokens": [ "When", "did", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "Zhi", "Guang", "return", "to", "Nanjing", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 13, 18, 22, 26, 32, 39, 42, 49 ] }
{ "text": [ "1407" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 265 ], "end": [ 268 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 54 ], "end": [ 54 ] } ] }
[ "1407" ]
SQuAD
In order to seek out the Karmapa, the Yongle Emperor dispatched his eunuch Hou Xian and the Buddhist monk Zhi Guang (d. 1435) to Tibet. Traveling to Lhasa either through Qinghai or via the Silk Road to Khotan, Hou Xian and Zhi Guang did not return to Nanjing until 1407.
{ "tokens": [ "In", "order", "to", "seek", "out", "the", "Karmapa", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "dispatched", "his", "eunuch", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "the", "Buddhist", "monk", "Zhi", "Guang", "(", "d.", "1435", ")", "to", "Tibet", ".", "Traveling", "to", "Lhasa", "either", "through", "Qinghai", "or", "via", "the", "Silk", "Road", "to", "Khotan", ",", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "Zhi", "Guang", "did", "not", "return", "to", "Nanjing", "until", "1407", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 9, 12, 17, 21, 25, 32, 34, 38, 45, 53, 64, 68, 75, 79, 84, 88, 92, 101, 106, 110, 116, 117, 120, 124, 126, 129, 134, 136, 146, 149, 155, 162, 170, 178, 181, 185, 189, 194, 199, 202, 208, 210, 214, 219, 223, 227, 233, 237, 241, 248, 251, 259, 265, 269 ] }
83eb00e7a5454b0dbd3f4223919f9721
Where did Hou Xian and Zhi Guang travel through on their way to the Karmapa?
{ "tokens": [ "Where", "did", "Hou", "Xian", "and", "Zhi", "Guang", "travel", "through", "on", "their", "way", "to", "the", "Karmapa", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 10, 14, 19, 23, 27, 33, 40, 48, 51, 57, 61, 64, 68, 75 ] }
{ "text": [ "through Qinghai or via the Silk Road to Khotan" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 162 ], "end": [ 207 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 33 ], "end": [ 41 ] } ] }
[ "through Qinghai or via the Silk Road to Khotan" ]
SQuAD
Journalist and author Thomas Laird, in his book The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama, writes that Wang and Nyima present the government viewpoint of the People's Republic of China in their Historical Status of China's Tibet, and fail to realize that China was "absorbed into a larger, non-Chinese political unit" during the Mongol Yuan dynasty, which Wang and Nyima paint as a characteristic Chinese dynasty succeeded by the Ming. Laird asserts that the ruling Mongol khans never administered Tibet as part of China and instead ruled them as separate territories, comparing the Mongols with the British who colonized India and New Zealand, yet stating this does not make India part of New Zealand as a consequence. Of later Mongol and Tibetan accounts interpreting the Mongol conquest of Tibet, Laird asserts that "they, like all non-Chinese historical narratives, never portray the Mongol subjugation of Tibet as a Chinese one."
{ "tokens": [ "Journalist", "and", "author", "Thomas", "Laird", ",", "in", "his", "book", "The", "Story", "of", "Tibet", ":", "Conversations", "with", "the", "Dalai", "Lama", ",", "writes", "that", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "present", "the", "government", "viewpoint", "of", "the", "People", "'s", "Republic", "of", "China", "in", "their", "Historical", "Status", "of", "China", "'s", "Tibet", ",", "and", "fail", "to", "realize", "that", "China", "was", "\"", "absorbed", "into", "a", "larger", ",", "non", "-", "Chinese", "political", "unit", "\"", "during", "the", "Mongol", "Yuan", "dynasty", ",", "which", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "paint", "as", "a", "characteristic", "Chinese", "dynasty", "succeeded", "by", "the", "Ming", ".", "Laird", "asserts", "that", "the", "ruling", "Mongol", "khans", "never", "administered", "Tibet", "as", "part", "of", "China", "and", "instead", "ruled", "them", "as", "separate", "territories", ",", "comparing", "the", "Mongols", "with", "the", "British", "who", "colonized", "India", "and", "New", "Zealand", ",", "yet", "stating", "this", "does", "not", "make", "India", "part", "of", "New", "Zealand", "as", "a", "consequence", ".", "Of", "later", "Mongol", "and", "Tibetan", "accounts", "interpreting", "the", "Mongol", "conquest", "of", "Tibet", ",", "Laird", "asserts", "that", "\"", "they", ",", "like", "all", "non", "-", "Chinese", "historical", "narratives", ",", "never", "portray", "the", "Mongol", "subjugation", "of", "Tibet", "as", "a", "Chinese", "one", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 11, 15, 22, 29, 34, 36, 39, 43, 48, 52, 58, 61, 66, 68, 82, 87, 91, 97, 101, 103, 110, 115, 120, 124, 130, 138, 142, 153, 163, 166, 170, 176, 179, 188, 191, 197, 200, 206, 217, 224, 227, 232, 235, 240, 242, 246, 251, 254, 262, 267, 273, 277, 278, 287, 292, 294, 300, 302, 305, 306, 314, 324, 328, 330, 337, 341, 348, 353, 360, 362, 368, 373, 377, 383, 389, 392, 394, 409, 417, 425, 435, 438, 442, 446, 448, 454, 462, 467, 471, 478, 485, 491, 497, 510, 516, 519, 524, 527, 533, 537, 545, 551, 556, 559, 568, 579, 581, 591, 595, 603, 608, 612, 620, 624, 634, 640, 644, 648, 655, 657, 661, 669, 674, 679, 683, 688, 694, 699, 702, 706, 714, 717, 719, 730, 732, 735, 741, 748, 752, 760, 769, 782, 786, 793, 802, 805, 810, 812, 818, 826, 831, 832, 836, 838, 843, 847, 850, 851, 859, 870, 880, 882, 888, 896, 900, 907, 919, 922, 928, 931, 933, 941, 944, 945 ] }
180c3aa6db3148579db32cb4908846d2
Who wrote the book The Story of Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "wrote", "the", "book", "The", "Story", "of", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 10, 14, 19, 23, 29, 32, 37 ] }
{ "text": [ "Journalist and author Thomas Laird" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 0 ], "end": [ 33 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 0 ], "end": [ 4 ] } ] }
[ "Journalist and author Thomas Laird" ]
SQuAD
Journalist and author Thomas Laird, in his book The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama, writes that Wang and Nyima present the government viewpoint of the People's Republic of China in their Historical Status of China's Tibet, and fail to realize that China was "absorbed into a larger, non-Chinese political unit" during the Mongol Yuan dynasty, which Wang and Nyima paint as a characteristic Chinese dynasty succeeded by the Ming. Laird asserts that the ruling Mongol khans never administered Tibet as part of China and instead ruled them as separate territories, comparing the Mongols with the British who colonized India and New Zealand, yet stating this does not make India part of New Zealand as a consequence. Of later Mongol and Tibetan accounts interpreting the Mongol conquest of Tibet, Laird asserts that "they, like all non-Chinese historical narratives, never portray the Mongol subjugation of Tibet as a Chinese one."
{ "tokens": [ "Journalist", "and", "author", "Thomas", "Laird", ",", "in", "his", "book", "The", "Story", "of", "Tibet", ":", "Conversations", "with", "the", "Dalai", "Lama", ",", "writes", "that", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "present", "the", "government", "viewpoint", "of", "the", "People", "'s", "Republic", "of", "China", "in", "their", "Historical", "Status", "of", "China", "'s", "Tibet", ",", "and", "fail", "to", "realize", "that", "China", "was", "\"", "absorbed", "into", "a", "larger", ",", "non", "-", "Chinese", "political", "unit", "\"", "during", "the", "Mongol", "Yuan", "dynasty", ",", "which", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "paint", "as", "a", "characteristic", "Chinese", "dynasty", "succeeded", "by", "the", "Ming", ".", "Laird", "asserts", "that", "the", "ruling", "Mongol", "khans", "never", "administered", "Tibet", "as", "part", "of", "China", "and", "instead", "ruled", "them", "as", "separate", "territories", ",", "comparing", "the", "Mongols", "with", "the", "British", "who", "colonized", "India", "and", "New", "Zealand", ",", "yet", "stating", "this", "does", "not", "make", "India", "part", "of", "New", "Zealand", "as", "a", "consequence", ".", "Of", "later", "Mongol", "and", "Tibetan", "accounts", "interpreting", "the", "Mongol", "conquest", "of", "Tibet", ",", "Laird", "asserts", "that", "\"", "they", ",", "like", "all", "non", "-", "Chinese", "historical", "narratives", ",", "never", "portray", "the", "Mongol", "subjugation", "of", "Tibet", "as", "a", "Chinese", "one", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 11, 15, 22, 29, 34, 36, 39, 43, 48, 52, 58, 61, 66, 68, 82, 87, 91, 97, 101, 103, 110, 115, 120, 124, 130, 138, 142, 153, 163, 166, 170, 176, 179, 188, 191, 197, 200, 206, 217, 224, 227, 232, 235, 240, 242, 246, 251, 254, 262, 267, 273, 277, 278, 287, 292, 294, 300, 302, 305, 306, 314, 324, 328, 330, 337, 341, 348, 353, 360, 362, 368, 373, 377, 383, 389, 392, 394, 409, 417, 425, 435, 438, 442, 446, 448, 454, 462, 467, 471, 478, 485, 491, 497, 510, 516, 519, 524, 527, 533, 537, 545, 551, 556, 559, 568, 579, 581, 591, 595, 603, 608, 612, 620, 624, 634, 640, 644, 648, 655, 657, 661, 669, 674, 679, 683, 688, 694, 699, 702, 706, 714, 717, 719, 730, 732, 735, 741, 748, 752, 760, 769, 782, 786, 793, 802, 805, 810, 812, 818, 826, 831, 832, 836, 838, 843, 847, 850, 851, 859, 870, 880, 882, 888, 896, 900, 907, 919, 922, 928, 931, 933, 941, 944, 945 ] }
8c2db83ab8b448d1b101ccc558935398
who colonized India and New Zealand?
{ "tokens": [ "who", "colonized", "India", "and", "New", "Zealand", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 14, 20, 24, 28, 35 ] }
{ "text": [ "the British" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 608 ], "end": [ 618 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 111 ], "end": [ 112 ] } ] }
[ "the British" ]
SQuAD
Journalist and author Thomas Laird, in his book The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama, writes that Wang and Nyima present the government viewpoint of the People's Republic of China in their Historical Status of China's Tibet, and fail to realize that China was "absorbed into a larger, non-Chinese political unit" during the Mongol Yuan dynasty, which Wang and Nyima paint as a characteristic Chinese dynasty succeeded by the Ming. Laird asserts that the ruling Mongol khans never administered Tibet as part of China and instead ruled them as separate territories, comparing the Mongols with the British who colonized India and New Zealand, yet stating this does not make India part of New Zealand as a consequence. Of later Mongol and Tibetan accounts interpreting the Mongol conquest of Tibet, Laird asserts that "they, like all non-Chinese historical narratives, never portray the Mongol subjugation of Tibet as a Chinese one."
{ "tokens": [ "Journalist", "and", "author", "Thomas", "Laird", ",", "in", "his", "book", "The", "Story", "of", "Tibet", ":", "Conversations", "with", "the", "Dalai", "Lama", ",", "writes", "that", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "present", "the", "government", "viewpoint", "of", "the", "People", "'s", "Republic", "of", "China", "in", "their", "Historical", "Status", "of", "China", "'s", "Tibet", ",", "and", "fail", "to", "realize", "that", "China", "was", "\"", "absorbed", "into", "a", "larger", ",", "non", "-", "Chinese", "political", "unit", "\"", "during", "the", "Mongol", "Yuan", "dynasty", ",", "which", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "paint", "as", "a", "characteristic", "Chinese", "dynasty", "succeeded", "by", "the", "Ming", ".", "Laird", "asserts", "that", "the", "ruling", "Mongol", "khans", "never", "administered", "Tibet", "as", "part", "of", "China", "and", "instead", "ruled", "them", "as", "separate", "territories", ",", "comparing", "the", "Mongols", "with", "the", "British", "who", "colonized", "India", "and", "New", "Zealand", ",", "yet", "stating", "this", "does", "not", "make", "India", "part", "of", "New", "Zealand", "as", "a", "consequence", ".", "Of", "later", "Mongol", "and", "Tibetan", "accounts", "interpreting", "the", "Mongol", "conquest", "of", "Tibet", ",", "Laird", "asserts", "that", "\"", "they", ",", "like", "all", "non", "-", "Chinese", "historical", "narratives", ",", "never", "portray", "the", "Mongol", "subjugation", "of", "Tibet", "as", "a", "Chinese", "one", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 11, 15, 22, 29, 34, 36, 39, 43, 48, 52, 58, 61, 66, 68, 82, 87, 91, 97, 101, 103, 110, 115, 120, 124, 130, 138, 142, 153, 163, 166, 170, 176, 179, 188, 191, 197, 200, 206, 217, 224, 227, 232, 235, 240, 242, 246, 251, 254, 262, 267, 273, 277, 278, 287, 292, 294, 300, 302, 305, 306, 314, 324, 328, 330, 337, 341, 348, 353, 360, 362, 368, 373, 377, 383, 389, 392, 394, 409, 417, 425, 435, 438, 442, 446, 448, 454, 462, 467, 471, 478, 485, 491, 497, 510, 516, 519, 524, 527, 533, 537, 545, 551, 556, 559, 568, 579, 581, 591, 595, 603, 608, 612, 620, 624, 634, 640, 644, 648, 655, 657, 661, 669, 674, 679, 683, 688, 694, 699, 702, 706, 714, 717, 719, 730, 732, 735, 741, 748, 752, 760, 769, 782, 786, 793, 802, 805, 810, 812, 818, 826, 831, 832, 836, 838, 843, 847, 850, 851, 859, 870, 880, 882, 888, 896, 900, 907, 919, 922, 928, 931, 933, 941, 944, 945 ] }
c54f09dad49148e495d5c83fc9f8e7e8
Who's viewpoint does Thomas Laird believe Wang and Nyima present?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "'s", "viewpoint", "does", "Thomas", "Laird", "believe", "Wang", "and", "Nyima", "present", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 6, 16, 21, 28, 34, 42, 47, 51, 57, 64 ] }
{ "text": [ "the government viewpoint of the People's Republic of China" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 138 ], "end": [ 195 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 26 ], "end": [ 35 ] } ] }
[ "the government viewpoint of the People's Republic of China" ]
SQuAD
Dawa Norbu argues that modern Chinese Communist historians tend to be in favor of the view that the Ming simply reappointed old Yuan dynasty officials in Tibet and perpetuated their rule of Tibet in this manner. Norbu writes that, although this would have been true for the eastern Tibetan regions of Amdo and Kham's "tribute-cum-trade" relations with the Ming, it was untrue if applied to the western Tibetan regions of Ü-Tsang and Ngari. After the Phagmodrupa Changchub Gyaltsen, these were ruled by "three successive nationalistic regimes," which Norbu writes "Communist historians prefer to ignore."
{ "tokens": [ "Dawa", "Norbu", "argues", "that", "modern", "Chinese", "Communist", "historians", "tend", "to", "be", "in", "favor", "of", "the", "view", "that", "the", "Ming", "simply", "reappointed", "old", "Yuan", "dynasty", "officials", "in", "Tibet", "and", "perpetuated", "their", "rule", "of", "Tibet", "in", "this", "manner", ".", "Norbu", "writes", "that", ",", "although", "this", "would", "have", "been", "true", "for", "the", "eastern", "Tibetan", "regions", "of", "Amdo", "and", "Kham", "'s", "\"", "tribute", "-", "cum", "-", "trade", "\"", "relations", "with", "the", "Ming", ",", "it", "was", "untrue", "if", "applied", "to", "the", "western", "Tibetan", "regions", "of", "Ü", "-", "Tsang", "and", "Ngari", ".", "After", "the", "Phagmodrupa", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", ",", "these", "were", "ruled", "by", "\"", "three", "successive", "nationalistic", "regimes", ",", "\"", "which", "Norbu", "writes", "\"", "Communist", "historians", "prefer", "to", "ignore", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 11, 18, 23, 30, 38, 48, 59, 64, 67, 70, 73, 79, 82, 86, 91, 96, 100, 105, 112, 124, 128, 133, 141, 151, 154, 160, 164, 176, 182, 187, 190, 196, 199, 204, 210, 212, 218, 225, 229, 231, 240, 245, 251, 256, 261, 266, 270, 274, 282, 290, 298, 301, 306, 310, 314, 317, 318, 325, 326, 329, 330, 335, 337, 347, 352, 356, 360, 362, 365, 369, 376, 379, 387, 390, 394, 402, 410, 418, 421, 422, 423, 429, 433, 438, 440, 446, 450, 462, 472, 480, 482, 488, 493, 499, 502, 503, 509, 520, 534, 541, 542, 544, 550, 556, 563, 564, 574, 585, 592, 595, 601, 602 ] }
4886b1fdaee2480e974baffa61981ad2
Who believed the Ming reappointed old Yuan dynasty officials in Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "believed", "the", "Ming", "reappointed", "old", "Yuan", "dynasty", "officials", "in", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 13, 17, 22, 34, 38, 43, 51, 61, 64, 69 ] }
{ "text": [ "Dawa Norbu" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 0 ], "end": [ 9 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 0 ], "end": [ 1 ] } ] }
[ "Dawa Norbu" ]
SQuAD
In his usurpation of the throne from the Jianwen Emperor (r. 1398–1402), the Yongle Emperor was aided by the Buddhist monk Yao Guangxiao, and like his father, the Hongwu Emperor, the Yongle Emperor was "well-disposed towards Buddhism", claims Rossabi. On March 10, 1403, the Yongle Emperor invited Deshin Shekpa, 5th Karmapa Lama (1384–1415), to his court, even though the fourth Karmapa had rejected the invitation of the Hongwu Emperor. A Tibetan translation in the 16th century preserves the letter of the Yongle Emperor, which the Association for Asian Studies notes is polite and complimentary towards the Karmapa. The letter of invitation reads,
{ "tokens": [ "In", "his", "usurpation", "of", "the", "throne", "from", "the", "Jianwen", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1398–1402", ")", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "was", "aided", "by", "the", "Buddhist", "monk", "Yao", "Guangxiao", ",", "and", "like", "his", "father", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "was", "\"", "well", "-", "disposed", "towards", "Buddhism", "\"", ",", "claims", "Rossabi", ".", "On", "March", "10", ",", "1403", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "invited", "Deshin", "Shekpa", ",", "5th", "Karmapa", "Lama", "(", "1384–1415", ")", ",", "to", "his", "court", ",", "even", "though", "the", "fourth", "Karmapa", "had", "rejected", "the", "invitation", "of", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", ".", "A", "Tibetan", "translation", "in", "the", "16th", "century", "preserves", "the", "letter", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", ",", "which", "the", "Association", "for", "Asian", "Studies", "notes", "is", "polite", "and", "complimentary", "towards", "the", "Karmapa", ".", "The", "letter", "of", "invitation", "reads", "," ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 7, 18, 21, 25, 32, 37, 41, 49, 57, 58, 61, 70, 71, 73, 77, 84, 92, 96, 102, 105, 109, 118, 123, 127, 136, 138, 142, 147, 151, 157, 159, 163, 170, 177, 179, 183, 190, 198, 202, 203, 207, 208, 217, 225, 233, 234, 236, 243, 250, 252, 255, 261, 263, 265, 269, 271, 275, 282, 290, 298, 305, 311, 313, 317, 325, 330, 331, 340, 341, 343, 346, 350, 355, 357, 362, 369, 373, 380, 388, 392, 401, 405, 416, 419, 423, 430, 437, 439, 441, 449, 461, 464, 468, 473, 481, 491, 495, 502, 505, 509, 516, 523, 525, 531, 535, 547, 551, 557, 565, 571, 574, 581, 585, 599, 607, 611, 618, 620, 624, 631, 634, 645, 650 ] }
1d6d0e8d7e964f5e874c299c9de05056
What year did the Jianwen Emperor reign start and end?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "year", "did", "the", "Jianwen", "Emperor", "reign", "start", "and", "end", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 10, 14, 18, 26, 34, 40, 46, 50, 53 ] }
{ "text": [ "1398–1402" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 61 ], "end": [ 69 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 12 ], "end": [ 12 ] } ] }
[ "1398–1402" ]
SQuAD
In his usurpation of the throne from the Jianwen Emperor (r. 1398–1402), the Yongle Emperor was aided by the Buddhist monk Yao Guangxiao, and like his father, the Hongwu Emperor, the Yongle Emperor was "well-disposed towards Buddhism", claims Rossabi. On March 10, 1403, the Yongle Emperor invited Deshin Shekpa, 5th Karmapa Lama (1384–1415), to his court, even though the fourth Karmapa had rejected the invitation of the Hongwu Emperor. A Tibetan translation in the 16th century preserves the letter of the Yongle Emperor, which the Association for Asian Studies notes is polite and complimentary towards the Karmapa. The letter of invitation reads,
{ "tokens": [ "In", "his", "usurpation", "of", "the", "throne", "from", "the", "Jianwen", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1398–1402", ")", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "was", "aided", "by", "the", "Buddhist", "monk", "Yao", "Guangxiao", ",", "and", "like", "his", "father", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "was", "\"", "well", "-", "disposed", "towards", "Buddhism", "\"", ",", "claims", "Rossabi", ".", "On", "March", "10", ",", "1403", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "invited", "Deshin", "Shekpa", ",", "5th", "Karmapa", "Lama", "(", "1384–1415", ")", ",", "to", "his", "court", ",", "even", "though", "the", "fourth", "Karmapa", "had", "rejected", "the", "invitation", "of", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", ".", "A", "Tibetan", "translation", "in", "the", "16th", "century", "preserves", "the", "letter", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", ",", "which", "the", "Association", "for", "Asian", "Studies", "notes", "is", "polite", "and", "complimentary", "towards", "the", "Karmapa", ".", "The", "letter", "of", "invitation", "reads", "," ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 7, 18, 21, 25, 32, 37, 41, 49, 57, 58, 61, 70, 71, 73, 77, 84, 92, 96, 102, 105, 109, 118, 123, 127, 136, 138, 142, 147, 151, 157, 159, 163, 170, 177, 179, 183, 190, 198, 202, 203, 207, 208, 217, 225, 233, 234, 236, 243, 250, 252, 255, 261, 263, 265, 269, 271, 275, 282, 290, 298, 305, 311, 313, 317, 325, 330, 331, 340, 341, 343, 346, 350, 355, 357, 362, 369, 373, 380, 388, 392, 401, 405, 416, 419, 423, 430, 437, 439, 441, 449, 461, 464, 468, 473, 481, 491, 495, 502, 505, 509, 516, 523, 525, 531, 535, 547, 551, 557, 565, 571, 574, 581, 585, 599, 607, 611, 618, 620, 624, 631, 634, 645, 650 ] }
bddd8dd13ed743d291558380fde1f28b
Who aided the Yongle Emperor?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "aided", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 10, 14, 21, 28 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Buddhist monk Yao Guangxiao" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 105 ], "end": [ 135 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 21 ], "end": [ 25 ] } ] }
[ "the Buddhist monk Yao Guangxiao" ]
SQuAD
In his usurpation of the throne from the Jianwen Emperor (r. 1398–1402), the Yongle Emperor was aided by the Buddhist monk Yao Guangxiao, and like his father, the Hongwu Emperor, the Yongle Emperor was "well-disposed towards Buddhism", claims Rossabi. On March 10, 1403, the Yongle Emperor invited Deshin Shekpa, 5th Karmapa Lama (1384–1415), to his court, even though the fourth Karmapa had rejected the invitation of the Hongwu Emperor. A Tibetan translation in the 16th century preserves the letter of the Yongle Emperor, which the Association for Asian Studies notes is polite and complimentary towards the Karmapa. The letter of invitation reads,
{ "tokens": [ "In", "his", "usurpation", "of", "the", "throne", "from", "the", "Jianwen", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1398–1402", ")", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "was", "aided", "by", "the", "Buddhist", "monk", "Yao", "Guangxiao", ",", "and", "like", "his", "father", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "was", "\"", "well", "-", "disposed", "towards", "Buddhism", "\"", ",", "claims", "Rossabi", ".", "On", "March", "10", ",", "1403", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "invited", "Deshin", "Shekpa", ",", "5th", "Karmapa", "Lama", "(", "1384–1415", ")", ",", "to", "his", "court", ",", "even", "though", "the", "fourth", "Karmapa", "had", "rejected", "the", "invitation", "of", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", ".", "A", "Tibetan", "translation", "in", "the", "16th", "century", "preserves", "the", "letter", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", ",", "which", "the", "Association", "for", "Asian", "Studies", "notes", "is", "polite", "and", "complimentary", "towards", "the", "Karmapa", ".", "The", "letter", "of", "invitation", "reads", "," ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 7, 18, 21, 25, 32, 37, 41, 49, 57, 58, 61, 70, 71, 73, 77, 84, 92, 96, 102, 105, 109, 118, 123, 127, 136, 138, 142, 147, 151, 157, 159, 163, 170, 177, 179, 183, 190, 198, 202, 203, 207, 208, 217, 225, 233, 234, 236, 243, 250, 252, 255, 261, 263, 265, 269, 271, 275, 282, 290, 298, 305, 311, 313, 317, 325, 330, 331, 340, 341, 343, 346, 350, 355, 357, 362, 369, 373, 380, 388, 392, 401, 405, 416, 419, 423, 430, 437, 439, 441, 449, 461, 464, 468, 473, 481, 491, 495, 502, 505, 509, 516, 523, 525, 531, 535, 547, 551, 557, 565, 571, 574, 581, 585, 599, 607, 611, 618, 620, 624, 631, 634, 645, 650 ] }
d3aafd6b458649308e85ae2e0194a277
Who was Yongle Emperor's father?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "was", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "father", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 15, 22, 25, 31 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Hongwu Emperor" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 159 ], "end": [ 176 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 32 ], "end": [ 34 ] } ] }
[ "the Hongwu Emperor" ]
SQuAD
In his usurpation of the throne from the Jianwen Emperor (r. 1398–1402), the Yongle Emperor was aided by the Buddhist monk Yao Guangxiao, and like his father, the Hongwu Emperor, the Yongle Emperor was "well-disposed towards Buddhism", claims Rossabi. On March 10, 1403, the Yongle Emperor invited Deshin Shekpa, 5th Karmapa Lama (1384–1415), to his court, even though the fourth Karmapa had rejected the invitation of the Hongwu Emperor. A Tibetan translation in the 16th century preserves the letter of the Yongle Emperor, which the Association for Asian Studies notes is polite and complimentary towards the Karmapa. The letter of invitation reads,
{ "tokens": [ "In", "his", "usurpation", "of", "the", "throne", "from", "the", "Jianwen", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1398–1402", ")", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "was", "aided", "by", "the", "Buddhist", "monk", "Yao", "Guangxiao", ",", "and", "like", "his", "father", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "was", "\"", "well", "-", "disposed", "towards", "Buddhism", "\"", ",", "claims", "Rossabi", ".", "On", "March", "10", ",", "1403", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "invited", "Deshin", "Shekpa", ",", "5th", "Karmapa", "Lama", "(", "1384–1415", ")", ",", "to", "his", "court", ",", "even", "though", "the", "fourth", "Karmapa", "had", "rejected", "the", "invitation", "of", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", ".", "A", "Tibetan", "translation", "in", "the", "16th", "century", "preserves", "the", "letter", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", ",", "which", "the", "Association", "for", "Asian", "Studies", "notes", "is", "polite", "and", "complimentary", "towards", "the", "Karmapa", ".", "The", "letter", "of", "invitation", "reads", "," ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 7, 18, 21, 25, 32, 37, 41, 49, 57, 58, 61, 70, 71, 73, 77, 84, 92, 96, 102, 105, 109, 118, 123, 127, 136, 138, 142, 147, 151, 157, 159, 163, 170, 177, 179, 183, 190, 198, 202, 203, 207, 208, 217, 225, 233, 234, 236, 243, 250, 252, 255, 261, 263, 265, 269, 271, 275, 282, 290, 298, 305, 311, 313, 317, 325, 330, 331, 340, 341, 343, 346, 350, 355, 357, 362, 369, 373, 380, 388, 392, 401, 405, 416, 419, 423, 430, 437, 439, 441, 449, 461, 464, 468, 473, 481, 491, 495, 502, 505, 509, 516, 523, 525, 531, 535, 547, 551, 557, 565, 571, 574, 581, 585, 599, 607, 611, 618, 620, 624, 631, 634, 645, 650 ] }
731d723ab7294919bd0b2816915dbb03
When did the Yongle Emperor invite Deshin Shekpa to his court?
{ "tokens": [ "When", "did", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "invite", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "to", "his", "court", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 13, 20, 28, 35, 42, 49, 52, 56, 61 ] }
{ "text": [ "March 10, 1403" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 255 ], "end": [ 268 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 52 ], "end": [ 55 ] } ] }
[ "March 10, 1403" ]
SQuAD
According to Chen, the Ming officer of Hezhou (modern day Linxia) informed the Hongwu Emperor that the general situation in Dbus and Gtsang "was under control," and so he suggested to the emperor that he offer the second Phagmodru ruler, Jamyang Shakya Gyaltsen, an official title. According to the Records of the Founding Emperor, the Hongwu Emperor issued an edict granting the title "Initiation State Master" to Sagya Gyaincain, while the latter sent envoys to the Ming court to hand over his jade seal of authority along with tribute of colored silk and satin, statues of the Buddha, Buddhist scriptures, and sarira.
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "Chen", ",", "the", "Ming", "officer", "of", "Hezhou", "(", "modern", "day", "Linxia", ")", "informed", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "that", "the", "general", "situation", "in", "Dbus", "and", "Gtsang", "\"", "was", "under", "control", ",", "\"", "and", "so", "he", "suggested", "to", "the", "emperor", "that", "he", "offer", "the", "second", "Phagmodru", "ruler", ",", "Jamyang", "Shakya", "Gyaltsen", ",", "an", "official", "title", ".", "According", "to", "the", "Records", "of", "the", "Founding", "Emperor", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "issued", "an", "edict", "granting", "the", "title", "\"", "Initiation", "State", "Master", "\"", "to", "Sagya", "Gyaincain", ",", "while", "the", "latter", "sent", "envoys", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "to", "hand", "over", "his", "jade", "seal", "of", "authority", "along", "with", "tribute", "of", "colored", "silk", "and", "satin", ",", "statues", "of", "the", "Buddha", ",", "Buddhist", "scriptures", ",", "and", "sarira", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 17, 19, 23, 28, 36, 39, 46, 47, 54, 58, 64, 66, 75, 79, 86, 94, 99, 103, 111, 121, 124, 129, 133, 140, 141, 145, 151, 158, 159, 161, 165, 168, 171, 181, 184, 188, 196, 201, 204, 210, 214, 221, 231, 236, 238, 246, 253, 261, 263, 266, 275, 280, 282, 292, 295, 299, 307, 310, 314, 323, 330, 332, 336, 343, 351, 358, 361, 367, 376, 380, 386, 387, 398, 404, 410, 412, 415, 421, 430, 432, 438, 442, 449, 454, 461, 464, 468, 473, 479, 482, 487, 492, 496, 501, 506, 509, 519, 525, 530, 538, 541, 549, 554, 558, 563, 565, 573, 576, 580, 586, 588, 597, 607, 609, 613, 619 ] }
2188389b5ab84d21914a05fe298046d1
Who did the Hongwu Emperor grant the title Initiation State Master to?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "did", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "grant", "the", "title", "Initiation", "State", "Master", "to", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 19, 27, 33, 37, 43, 54, 60, 67, 69 ] }
{ "text": [ "Sagya Gyaincain" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 415 ], "end": [ 429 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 79 ], "end": [ 80 ] } ] }
[ "Sagya Gyaincain" ]
SQuAD
According to Chen, the Ming officer of Hezhou (modern day Linxia) informed the Hongwu Emperor that the general situation in Dbus and Gtsang "was under control," and so he suggested to the emperor that he offer the second Phagmodru ruler, Jamyang Shakya Gyaltsen, an official title. According to the Records of the Founding Emperor, the Hongwu Emperor issued an edict granting the title "Initiation State Master" to Sagya Gyaincain, while the latter sent envoys to the Ming court to hand over his jade seal of authority along with tribute of colored silk and satin, statues of the Buddha, Buddhist scriptures, and sarira.
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "Chen", ",", "the", "Ming", "officer", "of", "Hezhou", "(", "modern", "day", "Linxia", ")", "informed", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "that", "the", "general", "situation", "in", "Dbus", "and", "Gtsang", "\"", "was", "under", "control", ",", "\"", "and", "so", "he", "suggested", "to", "the", "emperor", "that", "he", "offer", "the", "second", "Phagmodru", "ruler", ",", "Jamyang", "Shakya", "Gyaltsen", ",", "an", "official", "title", ".", "According", "to", "the", "Records", "of", "the", "Founding", "Emperor", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "issued", "an", "edict", "granting", "the", "title", "\"", "Initiation", "State", "Master", "\"", "to", "Sagya", "Gyaincain", ",", "while", "the", "latter", "sent", "envoys", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "to", "hand", "over", "his", "jade", "seal", "of", "authority", "along", "with", "tribute", "of", "colored", "silk", "and", "satin", ",", "statues", "of", "the", "Buddha", ",", "Buddhist", "scriptures", ",", "and", "sarira", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 17, 19, 23, 28, 36, 39, 46, 47, 54, 58, 64, 66, 75, 79, 86, 94, 99, 103, 111, 121, 124, 129, 133, 140, 141, 145, 151, 158, 159, 161, 165, 168, 171, 181, 184, 188, 196, 201, 204, 210, 214, 221, 231, 236, 238, 246, 253, 261, 263, 266, 275, 280, 282, 292, 295, 299, 307, 310, 314, 323, 330, 332, 336, 343, 351, 358, 361, 367, 376, 380, 386, 387, 398, 404, 410, 412, 415, 421, 430, 432, 438, 442, 449, 454, 461, 464, 468, 473, 479, 482, 487, 492, 496, 501, 506, 509, 519, 525, 530, 538, 541, 549, 554, 558, 563, 565, 573, 576, 580, 586, 588, 597, 607, 609, 613, 619 ] }
ea18b20356f0464fa8737ce5d0f5792f
Who suggested to the emperor that an official title be granted to second Phagmodru ruler?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "suggested", "to", "the", "emperor", "that", "an", "official", "title", "be", "granted", "to", "second", "Phagmodru", "ruler", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 14, 17, 21, 29, 34, 37, 46, 52, 55, 63, 66, 73, 83, 88 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Ming officer of Hezhou" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 19 ], "end": [ 44 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 4 ], "end": [ 8 ] } ] }
[ "the Ming officer of Hezhou" ]
SQuAD
According to Chen, the Ming officer of Hezhou (modern day Linxia) informed the Hongwu Emperor that the general situation in Dbus and Gtsang "was under control," and so he suggested to the emperor that he offer the second Phagmodru ruler, Jamyang Shakya Gyaltsen, an official title. According to the Records of the Founding Emperor, the Hongwu Emperor issued an edict granting the title "Initiation State Master" to Sagya Gyaincain, while the latter sent envoys to the Ming court to hand over his jade seal of authority along with tribute of colored silk and satin, statues of the Buddha, Buddhist scriptures, and sarira.
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "Chen", ",", "the", "Ming", "officer", "of", "Hezhou", "(", "modern", "day", "Linxia", ")", "informed", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "that", "the", "general", "situation", "in", "Dbus", "and", "Gtsang", "\"", "was", "under", "control", ",", "\"", "and", "so", "he", "suggested", "to", "the", "emperor", "that", "he", "offer", "the", "second", "Phagmodru", "ruler", ",", "Jamyang", "Shakya", "Gyaltsen", ",", "an", "official", "title", ".", "According", "to", "the", "Records", "of", "the", "Founding", "Emperor", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "issued", "an", "edict", "granting", "the", "title", "\"", "Initiation", "State", "Master", "\"", "to", "Sagya", "Gyaincain", ",", "while", "the", "latter", "sent", "envoys", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "to", "hand", "over", "his", "jade", "seal", "of", "authority", "along", "with", "tribute", "of", "colored", "silk", "and", "satin", ",", "statues", "of", "the", "Buddha", ",", "Buddhist", "scriptures", ",", "and", "sarira", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 17, 19, 23, 28, 36, 39, 46, 47, 54, 58, 64, 66, 75, 79, 86, 94, 99, 103, 111, 121, 124, 129, 133, 140, 141, 145, 151, 158, 159, 161, 165, 168, 171, 181, 184, 188, 196, 201, 204, 210, 214, 221, 231, 236, 238, 246, 253, 261, 263, 266, 275, 280, 282, 292, 295, 299, 307, 310, 314, 323, 330, 332, 336, 343, 351, 358, 361, 367, 376, 380, 386, 387, 398, 404, 410, 412, 415, 421, 430, 432, 438, 442, 449, 454, 461, 464, 468, 473, 479, 482, 487, 492, 496, 501, 506, 509, 519, 525, 530, 538, 541, 549, 554, 558, 563, 565, 573, 576, 580, 586, 588, 597, 607, 609, 613, 619 ] }
25c81ac291364af6bd70dc167ebcc4de
Who was the second Phagmodru ruler?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "was", "the", "second", "Phagmodru", "ruler", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 19, 29, 34 ] }
{ "text": [ "Jamyang Shakya Gyaltsen" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 238 ], "end": [ 260 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 47 ], "end": [ 49 ] } ] }
[ "Jamyang Shakya Gyaltsen" ]
SQuAD
According to Chen, the Ming officer of Hezhou (modern day Linxia) informed the Hongwu Emperor that the general situation in Dbus and Gtsang "was under control," and so he suggested to the emperor that he offer the second Phagmodru ruler, Jamyang Shakya Gyaltsen, an official title. According to the Records of the Founding Emperor, the Hongwu Emperor issued an edict granting the title "Initiation State Master" to Sagya Gyaincain, while the latter sent envoys to the Ming court to hand over his jade seal of authority along with tribute of colored silk and satin, statues of the Buddha, Buddhist scriptures, and sarira.
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "Chen", ",", "the", "Ming", "officer", "of", "Hezhou", "(", "modern", "day", "Linxia", ")", "informed", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "that", "the", "general", "situation", "in", "Dbus", "and", "Gtsang", "\"", "was", "under", "control", ",", "\"", "and", "so", "he", "suggested", "to", "the", "emperor", "that", "he", "offer", "the", "second", "Phagmodru", "ruler", ",", "Jamyang", "Shakya", "Gyaltsen", ",", "an", "official", "title", ".", "According", "to", "the", "Records", "of", "the", "Founding", "Emperor", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "issued", "an", "edict", "granting", "the", "title", "\"", "Initiation", "State", "Master", "\"", "to", "Sagya", "Gyaincain", ",", "while", "the", "latter", "sent", "envoys", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "to", "hand", "over", "his", "jade", "seal", "of", "authority", "along", "with", "tribute", "of", "colored", "silk", "and", "satin", ",", "statues", "of", "the", "Buddha", ",", "Buddhist", "scriptures", ",", "and", "sarira", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 17, 19, 23, 28, 36, 39, 46, 47, 54, 58, 64, 66, 75, 79, 86, 94, 99, 103, 111, 121, 124, 129, 133, 140, 141, 145, 151, 158, 159, 161, 165, 168, 171, 181, 184, 188, 196, 201, 204, 210, 214, 221, 231, 236, 238, 246, 253, 261, 263, 266, 275, 280, 282, 292, 295, 299, 307, 310, 314, 323, 330, 332, 336, 343, 351, 358, 361, 367, 376, 380, 386, 387, 398, 404, 410, 412, 415, 421, 430, 432, 438, 442, 449, 454, 461, 464, 468, 473, 479, 482, 487, 492, 496, 501, 506, 509, 519, 525, 530, 538, 541, 549, 554, 558, 563, 565, 573, 576, 580, 586, 588, 597, 607, 609, 613, 619 ] }
5d3f229dfff44504a925f3b807f40a3c
Who told the emperor that the situation in Dbus and Gtsang were under control?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "told", "the", "emperor", "that", "the", "situation", "in", "Dbus", "and", "Gtsang", "were", "under", "control", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 13, 21, 26, 30, 40, 43, 48, 52, 59, 64, 70, 77 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Ming officer of Hezhou" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 19 ], "end": [ 44 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 4 ], "end": [ 8 ] } ] }
[ "the Ming officer of Hezhou" ]
SQuAD
According to Chen, the Ming officer of Hezhou (modern day Linxia) informed the Hongwu Emperor that the general situation in Dbus and Gtsang "was under control," and so he suggested to the emperor that he offer the second Phagmodru ruler, Jamyang Shakya Gyaltsen, an official title. According to the Records of the Founding Emperor, the Hongwu Emperor issued an edict granting the title "Initiation State Master" to Sagya Gyaincain, while the latter sent envoys to the Ming court to hand over his jade seal of authority along with tribute of colored silk and satin, statues of the Buddha, Buddhist scriptures, and sarira.
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "Chen", ",", "the", "Ming", "officer", "of", "Hezhou", "(", "modern", "day", "Linxia", ")", "informed", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "that", "the", "general", "situation", "in", "Dbus", "and", "Gtsang", "\"", "was", "under", "control", ",", "\"", "and", "so", "he", "suggested", "to", "the", "emperor", "that", "he", "offer", "the", "second", "Phagmodru", "ruler", ",", "Jamyang", "Shakya", "Gyaltsen", ",", "an", "official", "title", ".", "According", "to", "the", "Records", "of", "the", "Founding", "Emperor", ",", "the", "Hongwu", "Emperor", "issued", "an", "edict", "granting", "the", "title", "\"", "Initiation", "State", "Master", "\"", "to", "Sagya", "Gyaincain", ",", "while", "the", "latter", "sent", "envoys", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "to", "hand", "over", "his", "jade", "seal", "of", "authority", "along", "with", "tribute", "of", "colored", "silk", "and", "satin", ",", "statues", "of", "the", "Buddha", ",", "Buddhist", "scriptures", ",", "and", "sarira", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 17, 19, 23, 28, 36, 39, 46, 47, 54, 58, 64, 66, 75, 79, 86, 94, 99, 103, 111, 121, 124, 129, 133, 140, 141, 145, 151, 158, 159, 161, 165, 168, 171, 181, 184, 188, 196, 201, 204, 210, 214, 221, 231, 236, 238, 246, 253, 261, 263, 266, 275, 280, 282, 292, 295, 299, 307, 310, 314, 323, 330, 332, 336, 343, 351, 358, 361, 367, 376, 380, 386, 387, 398, 404, 410, 412, 415, 421, 430, 432, 438, 442, 449, 454, 461, 464, 468, 473, 479, 482, 487, 492, 496, 501, 506, 509, 519, 525, 530, 538, 541, 549, 554, 558, 563, 565, 573, 576, 580, 586, 588, 597, 607, 609, 613, 619 ] }
2a517ab520f24013ae793a80ca39c8eb
Where were the envoys sent?
{ "tokens": [ "Where", "were", "the", "envoys", "sent", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 11, 15, 22, 26 ] }
{ "text": [ "to the Ming court" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 461 ], "end": [ 477 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 87 ], "end": [ 90 ] } ] }
[ "to the Ming court" ]
SQuAD
Wylie asserts that this type of censorship of the History of Ming distorts the true picture of the history of Sino-Tibetan relations, while the Ming court granted titles to various lamas regardless of their sectarian affiliations in an ongoing civil war in Tibet between competing Buddhist factions. Wylie argues that Ming titles of "King" granted indiscriminately to various Tibetan lamas or even their disciples should not be viewed as reappointments to earlier Yuan dynasty offices, since the viceregal Sakya regime established by the Mongols in Tibet was overthrown by the Phagmodru myriarchy before the Ming existed.
{ "tokens": [ "Wylie", "asserts", "that", "this", "type", "of", "censorship", "of", "the", "History", "of", "Ming", "distorts", "the", "true", "picture", "of", "the", "history", "of", "Sino", "-", "Tibetan", "relations", ",", "while", "the", "Ming", "court", "granted", "titles", "to", "various", "lamas", "regardless", "of", "their", "sectarian", "affiliations", "in", "an", "ongoing", "civil", "war", "in", "Tibet", "between", "competing", "Buddhist", "factions", ".", "Wylie", "argues", "that", "Ming", "titles", "of", "\"", "King", "\"", "granted", "indiscriminately", "to", "various", "Tibetan", "lamas", "or", "even", "their", "disciples", "should", "not", "be", "viewed", "as", "reappointments", "to", "earlier", "Yuan", "dynasty", "offices", ",", "since", "the", "viceregal", "Sakya", "regime", "established", "by", "the", "Mongols", "in", "Tibet", "was", "overthrown", "by", "the", "Phagmodru", "myriarchy", "before", "the", "Ming", "existed", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 14, 19, 24, 29, 32, 43, 46, 50, 58, 61, 66, 75, 79, 84, 92, 95, 99, 107, 110, 114, 115, 123, 132, 134, 140, 144, 149, 155, 163, 170, 173, 181, 187, 198, 201, 207, 217, 230, 233, 236, 244, 250, 254, 257, 263, 271, 281, 290, 298, 300, 306, 313, 318, 323, 330, 333, 334, 338, 340, 348, 365, 368, 376, 384, 390, 393, 398, 404, 414, 421, 425, 428, 435, 438, 453, 456, 464, 469, 477, 484, 486, 492, 496, 506, 512, 519, 531, 534, 538, 546, 549, 555, 559, 570, 573, 577, 587, 597, 604, 608, 613, 620 ] }
d0cc86005c88434595bfe7e4d1f8207c
Regardless of their sectarian affiliations, who did the Ming grant titles to?
{ "tokens": [ "Regardless", "of", "their", "sectarian", "affiliations", ",", "who", "did", "the", "Ming", "grant", "titles", "to", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 11, 14, 20, 30, 42, 44, 48, 52, 56, 61, 67, 74, 76 ] }
{ "text": [ "various lamas" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 173 ], "end": [ 185 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 32 ], "end": [ 33 ] } ] }
[ "various lamas" ]
SQuAD
Wylie asserts that this type of censorship of the History of Ming distorts the true picture of the history of Sino-Tibetan relations, while the Ming court granted titles to various lamas regardless of their sectarian affiliations in an ongoing civil war in Tibet between competing Buddhist factions. Wylie argues that Ming titles of "King" granted indiscriminately to various Tibetan lamas or even their disciples should not be viewed as reappointments to earlier Yuan dynasty offices, since the viceregal Sakya regime established by the Mongols in Tibet was overthrown by the Phagmodru myriarchy before the Ming existed.
{ "tokens": [ "Wylie", "asserts", "that", "this", "type", "of", "censorship", "of", "the", "History", "of", "Ming", "distorts", "the", "true", "picture", "of", "the", "history", "of", "Sino", "-", "Tibetan", "relations", ",", "while", "the", "Ming", "court", "granted", "titles", "to", "various", "lamas", "regardless", "of", "their", "sectarian", "affiliations", "in", "an", "ongoing", "civil", "war", "in", "Tibet", "between", "competing", "Buddhist", "factions", ".", "Wylie", "argues", "that", "Ming", "titles", "of", "\"", "King", "\"", "granted", "indiscriminately", "to", "various", "Tibetan", "lamas", "or", "even", "their", "disciples", "should", "not", "be", "viewed", "as", "reappointments", "to", "earlier", "Yuan", "dynasty", "offices", ",", "since", "the", "viceregal", "Sakya", "regime", "established", "by", "the", "Mongols", "in", "Tibet", "was", "overthrown", "by", "the", "Phagmodru", "myriarchy", "before", "the", "Ming", "existed", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 14, 19, 24, 29, 32, 43, 46, 50, 58, 61, 66, 75, 79, 84, 92, 95, 99, 107, 110, 114, 115, 123, 132, 134, 140, 144, 149, 155, 163, 170, 173, 181, 187, 198, 201, 207, 217, 230, 233, 236, 244, 250, 254, 257, 263, 271, 281, 290, 298, 300, 306, 313, 318, 323, 330, 333, 334, 338, 340, 348, 365, 368, 376, 384, 390, 393, 398, 404, 414, 421, 425, 428, 435, 438, 453, 456, 464, 469, 477, 484, 486, 492, 496, 506, 512, 519, 531, 534, 538, 546, 549, 555, 559, 570, 573, 577, 587, 597, 604, 608, 613, 620 ] }
b45b71d501564f0b9e0cf3850cea7b4f
Who was the viceregal Sakya regime overthrown by?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "was", "the", "viceregal", "Sakya", "regime", "overthrown", "by", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 22, 28, 35, 46, 48 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Phagmodru myriarchy" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 573 ], "end": [ 595 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 96 ], "end": [ 98 ] } ] }
[ "the Phagmodru myriarchy" ]
SQuAD
Shih-Shan Henry Tsai writes that the Yongle Emperor sent his eunuch Yang Sanbao into Tibet in 1413 to gain the allegiance of various Tibetan princes, while the Yongle Emperor paid a small fortune in return gifts for tributes in order to maintain the loyalty of neighboring vassal states such as Nepal and Tibet. However, Van Praag states that Tibetan rulers upheld their own separate relations with the kingdoms of Nepal and Kashmir, and at times "engaged in armed confrontation with them."
{ "tokens": [ "Shih", "-", "Shan", "Henry", "Tsai", "writes", "that", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "sent", "his", "eunuch", "Yang", "Sanbao", "into", "Tibet", "in", "1413", "to", "gain", "the", "allegiance", "of", "various", "Tibetan", "princes", ",", "while", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "paid", "a", "small", "fortune", "in", "return", "gifts", "for", "tributes", "in", "order", "to", "maintain", "the", "loyalty", "of", "neighboring", "vassal", "states", "such", "as", "Nepal", "and", "Tibet", ".", "However", ",", "Van", "Praag", "states", "that", "Tibetan", "rulers", "upheld", "their", "own", "separate", "relations", "with", "the", "kingdoms", "of", "Nepal", "and", "Kashmir", ",", "and", "at", "times", "\"", "engaged", "in", "armed", "confrontation", "with", "them", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 5, 10, 16, 21, 28, 33, 37, 44, 52, 57, 61, 68, 73, 80, 85, 91, 94, 99, 102, 107, 111, 122, 125, 133, 141, 148, 150, 156, 160, 167, 175, 180, 182, 188, 196, 199, 206, 212, 216, 225, 228, 234, 237, 246, 250, 258, 261, 273, 280, 287, 292, 295, 301, 305, 310, 312, 319, 321, 325, 331, 338, 343, 351, 358, 365, 371, 375, 384, 394, 399, 403, 412, 415, 421, 425, 432, 434, 438, 441, 447, 448, 456, 459, 465, 479, 484, 488, 489 ] }
611dcbbaab8f4eaa88d7997b0b06e398
What was the name of the eunuch?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "was", "the", "name", "of", "the", " ", "eunuch", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 13, 18, 21, 25, 26, 32 ] }
{ "text": [ "Yang Sanbao" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 68 ], "end": [ 78 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 13 ], "end": [ 14 ] } ] }
[ "Yang Sanbao" ]
SQuAD
Shih-Shan Henry Tsai writes that the Yongle Emperor sent his eunuch Yang Sanbao into Tibet in 1413 to gain the allegiance of various Tibetan princes, while the Yongle Emperor paid a small fortune in return gifts for tributes in order to maintain the loyalty of neighboring vassal states such as Nepal and Tibet. However, Van Praag states that Tibetan rulers upheld their own separate relations with the kingdoms of Nepal and Kashmir, and at times "engaged in armed confrontation with them."
{ "tokens": [ "Shih", "-", "Shan", "Henry", "Tsai", "writes", "that", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "sent", "his", "eunuch", "Yang", "Sanbao", "into", "Tibet", "in", "1413", "to", "gain", "the", "allegiance", "of", "various", "Tibetan", "princes", ",", "while", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "paid", "a", "small", "fortune", "in", "return", "gifts", "for", "tributes", "in", "order", "to", "maintain", "the", "loyalty", "of", "neighboring", "vassal", "states", "such", "as", "Nepal", "and", "Tibet", ".", "However", ",", "Van", "Praag", "states", "that", "Tibetan", "rulers", "upheld", "their", "own", "separate", "relations", "with", "the", "kingdoms", "of", "Nepal", "and", "Kashmir", ",", "and", "at", "times", "\"", "engaged", "in", "armed", "confrontation", "with", "them", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 5, 10, 16, 21, 28, 33, 37, 44, 52, 57, 61, 68, 73, 80, 85, 91, 94, 99, 102, 107, 111, 122, 125, 133, 141, 148, 150, 156, 160, 167, 175, 180, 182, 188, 196, 199, 206, 212, 216, 225, 228, 234, 237, 246, 250, 258, 261, 273, 280, 287, 292, 295, 301, 305, 310, 312, 319, 321, 325, 331, 338, 343, 351, 358, 365, 371, 375, 384, 394, 399, 403, 412, 415, 421, 425, 432, 434, 438, 441, 447, 448, 456, 459, 465, 479, 484, 488, 489 ] }
56d471e688904806b528e30a4cefa7ec
Where did the Yongle Emperor send Yang Sanbao?
{ "tokens": [ "Where", "did", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "send", "Yang", "Sanbao", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 10, 14, 21, 29, 34, 39, 45 ] }
{ "text": [ "Tibet" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 85 ], "end": [ 89 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 16 ], "end": [ 16 ] } ] }
[ "Tibet" ]
SQuAD
Shih-Shan Henry Tsai writes that the Yongle Emperor sent his eunuch Yang Sanbao into Tibet in 1413 to gain the allegiance of various Tibetan princes, while the Yongle Emperor paid a small fortune in return gifts for tributes in order to maintain the loyalty of neighboring vassal states such as Nepal and Tibet. However, Van Praag states that Tibetan rulers upheld their own separate relations with the kingdoms of Nepal and Kashmir, and at times "engaged in armed confrontation with them."
{ "tokens": [ "Shih", "-", "Shan", "Henry", "Tsai", "writes", "that", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "sent", "his", "eunuch", "Yang", "Sanbao", "into", "Tibet", "in", "1413", "to", "gain", "the", "allegiance", "of", "various", "Tibetan", "princes", ",", "while", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "paid", "a", "small", "fortune", "in", "return", "gifts", "for", "tributes", "in", "order", "to", "maintain", "the", "loyalty", "of", "neighboring", "vassal", "states", "such", "as", "Nepal", "and", "Tibet", ".", "However", ",", "Van", "Praag", "states", "that", "Tibetan", "rulers", "upheld", "their", "own", "separate", "relations", "with", "the", "kingdoms", "of", "Nepal", "and", "Kashmir", ",", "and", "at", "times", "\"", "engaged", "in", "armed", "confrontation", "with", "them", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 5, 10, 16, 21, 28, 33, 37, 44, 52, 57, 61, 68, 73, 80, 85, 91, 94, 99, 102, 107, 111, 122, 125, 133, 141, 148, 150, 156, 160, 167, 175, 180, 182, 188, 196, 199, 206, 212, 216, 225, 228, 234, 237, 246, 250, 258, 261, 273, 280, 287, 292, 295, 301, 305, 310, 312, 319, 321, 325, 331, 338, 343, 351, 358, 365, 371, 375, 384, 394, 399, 403, 412, 415, 421, 425, 432, 434, 438, 441, 447, 448, 456, 459, 465, 479, 484, 488, 489 ] }
311ba5c0de3f40f8972bf64bf36a7939
When did Yongle Emperor send Yang Sanbao into Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "When", "did", "Yongle", "Emperor", "send", "Yang", "Sanbao", "into", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 16, 24, 29, 34, 41, 46, 51 ] }
{ "text": [ "1413" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 94 ], "end": [ 97 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 18 ], "end": [ 18 ] } ] }
[ "1413" ]
SQuAD
Shih-Shan Henry Tsai writes that the Yongle Emperor sent his eunuch Yang Sanbao into Tibet in 1413 to gain the allegiance of various Tibetan princes, while the Yongle Emperor paid a small fortune in return gifts for tributes in order to maintain the loyalty of neighboring vassal states such as Nepal and Tibet. However, Van Praag states that Tibetan rulers upheld their own separate relations with the kingdoms of Nepal and Kashmir, and at times "engaged in armed confrontation with them."
{ "tokens": [ "Shih", "-", "Shan", "Henry", "Tsai", "writes", "that", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "sent", "his", "eunuch", "Yang", "Sanbao", "into", "Tibet", "in", "1413", "to", "gain", "the", "allegiance", "of", "various", "Tibetan", "princes", ",", "while", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "paid", "a", "small", "fortune", "in", "return", "gifts", "for", "tributes", "in", "order", "to", "maintain", "the", "loyalty", "of", "neighboring", "vassal", "states", "such", "as", "Nepal", "and", "Tibet", ".", "However", ",", "Van", "Praag", "states", "that", "Tibetan", "rulers", "upheld", "their", "own", "separate", "relations", "with", "the", "kingdoms", "of", "Nepal", "and", "Kashmir", ",", "and", "at", "times", "\"", "engaged", "in", "armed", "confrontation", "with", "them", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 5, 10, 16, 21, 28, 33, 37, 44, 52, 57, 61, 68, 73, 80, 85, 91, 94, 99, 102, 107, 111, 122, 125, 133, 141, 148, 150, 156, 160, 167, 175, 180, 182, 188, 196, 199, 206, 212, 216, 225, 228, 234, 237, 246, 250, 258, 261, 273, 280, 287, 292, 295, 301, 305, 310, 312, 319, 321, 325, 331, 338, 343, 351, 358, 365, 371, 375, 384, 394, 399, 403, 412, 415, 421, 425, 432, 434, 438, 441, 447, 448, 456, 459, 465, 479, 484, 488, 489 ] }
fb3b4d21dee74709b87dc2a6fe6f3c6a
Why did Yongle Emperor send Yang Sanbao into Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Why", "did", "Yongle", "Emperor", "send", "Yang", "Sanbao", "into", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 15, 23, 28, 33, 40, 45, 50 ] }
{ "text": [ "the allegiance of various Tibetan princes" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 107 ], "end": [ 147 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 21 ], "end": [ 26 ] } ] }
[ "the allegiance of various Tibetan princes" ]
SQuAD
Shih-Shan Henry Tsai writes that the Yongle Emperor sent his eunuch Yang Sanbao into Tibet in 1413 to gain the allegiance of various Tibetan princes, while the Yongle Emperor paid a small fortune in return gifts for tributes in order to maintain the loyalty of neighboring vassal states such as Nepal and Tibet. However, Van Praag states that Tibetan rulers upheld their own separate relations with the kingdoms of Nepal and Kashmir, and at times "engaged in armed confrontation with them."
{ "tokens": [ "Shih", "-", "Shan", "Henry", "Tsai", "writes", "that", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "sent", "his", "eunuch", "Yang", "Sanbao", "into", "Tibet", "in", "1413", "to", "gain", "the", "allegiance", "of", "various", "Tibetan", "princes", ",", "while", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "paid", "a", "small", "fortune", "in", "return", "gifts", "for", "tributes", "in", "order", "to", "maintain", "the", "loyalty", "of", "neighboring", "vassal", "states", "such", "as", "Nepal", "and", "Tibet", ".", "However", ",", "Van", "Praag", "states", "that", "Tibetan", "rulers", "upheld", "their", "own", "separate", "relations", "with", "the", "kingdoms", "of", "Nepal", "and", "Kashmir", ",", "and", "at", "times", "\"", "engaged", "in", "armed", "confrontation", "with", "them", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 5, 10, 16, 21, 28, 33, 37, 44, 52, 57, 61, 68, 73, 80, 85, 91, 94, 99, 102, 107, 111, 122, 125, 133, 141, 148, 150, 156, 160, 167, 175, 180, 182, 188, 196, 199, 206, 212, 216, 225, 228, 234, 237, 246, 250, 258, 261, 273, 280, 287, 292, 295, 301, 305, 310, 312, 319, 321, 325, 331, 338, 343, 351, 358, 365, 371, 375, 384, 394, 399, 403, 412, 415, 421, 425, 432, 434, 438, 441, 447, 448, 456, 459, 465, 479, 484, 488, 489 ] }
359c0f194d7d47afb57c3f8f93bb3ef0
Why did the emperor pay a small fortune in gifts?
{ "tokens": [ "Why", "did", "the", "emperor", "pay", "a", "small", "fortune", "in", "gifts", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 26, 32, 40, 43, 48 ] }
{ "text": [ "to maintain the loyalty of neighboring vassal states" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 234 ], "end": [ 285 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 43 ], "end": [ 50 ] } ] }
[ "to maintain the loyalty of neighboring vassal states" ]
SQuAD
Tibetan sources say Deshin Shekpa also persuaded the Yongle Emperor not to impose his military might on Tibet as the Mongols had previously done. Thinley writes that before the Karmapa returned to Tibet, the Yongle Emperor began planning to send a military force into Tibet to forcibly give the Karmapa authority over all the Tibetan Buddhist schools but Deshin Shekpa dissuaded him. However, Hok-Lam Chan states that "there is little evidence that this was ever the emperor's intention" and that evidence indicates that Deshin Skekpa was invited strictly for religious purposes.
{ "tokens": [ "Tibetan", "sources", "say", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "also", "persuaded", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "not", "to", "impose", "his", "military", "might", "on", "Tibet", "as", "the", "Mongols", "had", "previously", "done", ".", "Thinley", "writes", "that", "before", "the", "Karmapa", "returned", "to", "Tibet", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "began", "planning", "to", "send", "a", "military", "force", "into", "Tibet", "to", "forcibly", "give", "the", "Karmapa", "authority", "over", "all", "the", "Tibetan", "Buddhist", "schools", "but", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "dissuaded", "him", ".", "However", ",", "Hok", "-", "Lam", "Chan", "states", "that", "\"", "there", "is", "little", "evidence", "that", "this", "was", "ever", "the", "emperor", "'s", "intention", "\"", "and", "that", "evidence", "indicates", "that", "Deshin", "Skekpa", "was", "invited", "strictly", "for", "religious", "purposes", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 8, 16, 20, 27, 34, 39, 49, 53, 60, 68, 72, 75, 82, 86, 95, 101, 104, 110, 113, 117, 125, 129, 140, 144, 146, 154, 161, 166, 173, 177, 185, 194, 197, 202, 204, 208, 215, 223, 229, 238, 241, 246, 248, 257, 263, 268, 274, 277, 286, 291, 295, 303, 313, 318, 322, 326, 334, 343, 351, 355, 362, 369, 379, 382, 384, 391, 393, 396, 397, 401, 406, 413, 418, 419, 425, 428, 435, 444, 449, 454, 458, 463, 467, 474, 477, 486, 488, 492, 497, 506, 516, 521, 528, 535, 539, 547, 556, 560, 570, 578 ] }
8954b95a254f49acaf5667e05395aaa6
Who imposed on the military might on Tibet in the past?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "imposed", "on", "the", "military", "might", "on", "Tibet", "in", "the", "past", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 12, 15, 19, 28, 34, 37, 43, 46, 50, 54 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Mongols" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 113 ], "end": [ 123 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 19 ], "end": [ 20 ] } ] }
[ "the Mongols" ]
SQuAD
Tibetan sources say Deshin Shekpa also persuaded the Yongle Emperor not to impose his military might on Tibet as the Mongols had previously done. Thinley writes that before the Karmapa returned to Tibet, the Yongle Emperor began planning to send a military force into Tibet to forcibly give the Karmapa authority over all the Tibetan Buddhist schools but Deshin Shekpa dissuaded him. However, Hok-Lam Chan states that "there is little evidence that this was ever the emperor's intention" and that evidence indicates that Deshin Skekpa was invited strictly for religious purposes.
{ "tokens": [ "Tibetan", "sources", "say", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "also", "persuaded", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "not", "to", "impose", "his", "military", "might", "on", "Tibet", "as", "the", "Mongols", "had", "previously", "done", ".", "Thinley", "writes", "that", "before", "the", "Karmapa", "returned", "to", "Tibet", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "began", "planning", "to", "send", "a", "military", "force", "into", "Tibet", "to", "forcibly", "give", "the", "Karmapa", "authority", "over", "all", "the", "Tibetan", "Buddhist", "schools", "but", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "dissuaded", "him", ".", "However", ",", "Hok", "-", "Lam", "Chan", "states", "that", "\"", "there", "is", "little", "evidence", "that", "this", "was", "ever", "the", "emperor", "'s", "intention", "\"", "and", "that", "evidence", "indicates", "that", "Deshin", "Skekpa", "was", "invited", "strictly", "for", "religious", "purposes", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 8, 16, 20, 27, 34, 39, 49, 53, 60, 68, 72, 75, 82, 86, 95, 101, 104, 110, 113, 117, 125, 129, 140, 144, 146, 154, 161, 166, 173, 177, 185, 194, 197, 202, 204, 208, 215, 223, 229, 238, 241, 246, 248, 257, 263, 268, 274, 277, 286, 291, 295, 303, 313, 318, 322, 326, 334, 343, 351, 355, 362, 369, 379, 382, 384, 391, 393, 396, 397, 401, 406, 413, 418, 419, 425, 428, 435, 444, 449, 454, 458, 463, 467, 474, 477, 486, 488, 492, 497, 506, 516, 521, 528, 535, 539, 547, 556, 560, 570, 578 ] }
b35a97dd9b6e4ec5aacc89556f631cc8
Hok-Lam Chan states that Deshin Skekpa was only invited for what purpose?
{ "tokens": [ "Hok", "-", "Lam", "Chan", "states", "that", "Deshin", "Skekpa", "was", "only", "invited", "for", "what", "purpose", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 4, 8, 13, 20, 25, 32, 39, 43, 48, 56, 60, 65, 72 ] }
{ "text": [ "religious purposes" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 560 ], "end": [ 577 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 98 ], "end": [ 99 ] } ] }
[ "religious purposes" ]
SQuAD
Tibetan sources say Deshin Shekpa also persuaded the Yongle Emperor not to impose his military might on Tibet as the Mongols had previously done. Thinley writes that before the Karmapa returned to Tibet, the Yongle Emperor began planning to send a military force into Tibet to forcibly give the Karmapa authority over all the Tibetan Buddhist schools but Deshin Shekpa dissuaded him. However, Hok-Lam Chan states that "there is little evidence that this was ever the emperor's intention" and that evidence indicates that Deshin Skekpa was invited strictly for religious purposes.
{ "tokens": [ "Tibetan", "sources", "say", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "also", "persuaded", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "not", "to", "impose", "his", "military", "might", "on", "Tibet", "as", "the", "Mongols", "had", "previously", "done", ".", "Thinley", "writes", "that", "before", "the", "Karmapa", "returned", "to", "Tibet", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "began", "planning", "to", "send", "a", "military", "force", "into", "Tibet", "to", "forcibly", "give", "the", "Karmapa", "authority", "over", "all", "the", "Tibetan", "Buddhist", "schools", "but", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "dissuaded", "him", ".", "However", ",", "Hok", "-", "Lam", "Chan", "states", "that", "\"", "there", "is", "little", "evidence", "that", "this", "was", "ever", "the", "emperor", "'s", "intention", "\"", "and", "that", "evidence", "indicates", "that", "Deshin", "Skekpa", "was", "invited", "strictly", "for", "religious", "purposes", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 8, 16, 20, 27, 34, 39, 49, 53, 60, 68, 72, 75, 82, 86, 95, 101, 104, 110, 113, 117, 125, 129, 140, 144, 146, 154, 161, 166, 173, 177, 185, 194, 197, 202, 204, 208, 215, 223, 229, 238, 241, 246, 248, 257, 263, 268, 274, 277, 286, 291, 295, 303, 313, 318, 322, 326, 334, 343, 351, 355, 362, 369, 379, 382, 384, 391, 393, 396, 397, 401, 406, 413, 418, 419, 425, 428, 435, 444, 449, 454, 458, 463, 467, 474, 477, 486, 488, 492, 497, 506, 516, 521, 528, 535, 539, 547, 556, 560, 570, 578 ] }
d32b6f4edbba4f41aa16dacc40f134b4
What was said to be the Yongle Emperor plans?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "was", "said", "to", "be", "the", " ", "Yongle", "Emperor", "plans", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 14, 17, 20, 24, 25, 32, 40, 45 ] }
{ "text": [ "to send a military force into Tibet" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 238 ], "end": [ 272 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 40 ], "end": [ 46 ] } ] }
[ "to send a military force into Tibet" ]
SQuAD
Tibetan sources say Deshin Shekpa also persuaded the Yongle Emperor not to impose his military might on Tibet as the Mongols had previously done. Thinley writes that before the Karmapa returned to Tibet, the Yongle Emperor began planning to send a military force into Tibet to forcibly give the Karmapa authority over all the Tibetan Buddhist schools but Deshin Shekpa dissuaded him. However, Hok-Lam Chan states that "there is little evidence that this was ever the emperor's intention" and that evidence indicates that Deshin Skekpa was invited strictly for religious purposes.
{ "tokens": [ "Tibetan", "sources", "say", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "also", "persuaded", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "not", "to", "impose", "his", "military", "might", "on", "Tibet", "as", "the", "Mongols", "had", "previously", "done", ".", "Thinley", "writes", "that", "before", "the", "Karmapa", "returned", "to", "Tibet", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "began", "planning", "to", "send", "a", "military", "force", "into", "Tibet", "to", "forcibly", "give", "the", "Karmapa", "authority", "over", "all", "the", "Tibetan", "Buddhist", "schools", "but", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "dissuaded", "him", ".", "However", ",", "Hok", "-", "Lam", "Chan", "states", "that", "\"", "there", "is", "little", "evidence", "that", "this", "was", "ever", "the", "emperor", "'s", "intention", "\"", "and", "that", "evidence", "indicates", "that", "Deshin", "Skekpa", "was", "invited", "strictly", "for", "religious", "purposes", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 8, 16, 20, 27, 34, 39, 49, 53, 60, 68, 72, 75, 82, 86, 95, 101, 104, 110, 113, 117, 125, 129, 140, 144, 146, 154, 161, 166, 173, 177, 185, 194, 197, 202, 204, 208, 215, 223, 229, 238, 241, 246, 248, 257, 263, 268, 274, 277, 286, 291, 295, 303, 313, 318, 322, 326, 334, 343, 351, 355, 362, 369, 379, 382, 384, 391, 393, 396, 397, 401, 406, 413, 418, 419, 425, 428, 435, 444, 449, 454, 458, 463, 467, 474, 477, 486, 488, 492, 497, 506, 516, 521, 528, 535, 539, 547, 556, 560, 570, 578 ] }
0e721f1730eb439387e03bca12cf6f72
Why was the Yongle Emperor said to have been planning to send military forces into Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Why", "was", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "said", "to", "have", "been", "planning", "to", "send", "military", "forces", "into", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 19, 27, 32, 35, 40, 45, 54, 57, 62, 71, 78, 83, 88 ] }
{ "text": [ "to forcibly give the Karmapa authority over all the Tibetan Buddhist schools" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 274 ], "end": [ 349 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 47 ], "end": [ 58 ] } ] }
[ "to forcibly give the Karmapa authority over all the Tibetan Buddhist schools" ]
SQuAD
Tibetan sources say Deshin Shekpa also persuaded the Yongle Emperor not to impose his military might on Tibet as the Mongols had previously done. Thinley writes that before the Karmapa returned to Tibet, the Yongle Emperor began planning to send a military force into Tibet to forcibly give the Karmapa authority over all the Tibetan Buddhist schools but Deshin Shekpa dissuaded him. However, Hok-Lam Chan states that "there is little evidence that this was ever the emperor's intention" and that evidence indicates that Deshin Skekpa was invited strictly for religious purposes.
{ "tokens": [ "Tibetan", "sources", "say", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "also", "persuaded", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "not", "to", "impose", "his", "military", "might", "on", "Tibet", "as", "the", "Mongols", "had", "previously", "done", ".", "Thinley", "writes", "that", "before", "the", "Karmapa", "returned", "to", "Tibet", ",", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "began", "planning", "to", "send", "a", "military", "force", "into", "Tibet", "to", "forcibly", "give", "the", "Karmapa", "authority", "over", "all", "the", "Tibetan", "Buddhist", "schools", "but", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "dissuaded", "him", ".", "However", ",", "Hok", "-", "Lam", "Chan", "states", "that", "\"", "there", "is", "little", "evidence", "that", "this", "was", "ever", "the", "emperor", "'s", "intention", "\"", "and", "that", "evidence", "indicates", "that", "Deshin", "Skekpa", "was", "invited", "strictly", "for", "religious", "purposes", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 8, 16, 20, 27, 34, 39, 49, 53, 60, 68, 72, 75, 82, 86, 95, 101, 104, 110, 113, 117, 125, 129, 140, 144, 146, 154, 161, 166, 173, 177, 185, 194, 197, 202, 204, 208, 215, 223, 229, 238, 241, 246, 248, 257, 263, 268, 274, 277, 286, 291, 295, 303, 313, 318, 322, 326, 334, 343, 351, 355, 362, 369, 379, 382, 384, 391, 393, 396, 397, 401, 406, 413, 418, 419, 425, 428, 435, 444, 449, 454, 458, 463, 467, 474, 477, 486, 488, 492, 497, 506, 516, 521, 528, 535, 539, 547, 556, 560, 570, 578 ] }
2322c7e5b96244f7ac9e93cf4221600d
Who convinced the Yongle emperor not to send military forces into Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "convinced", "the", "Yongle", "emperor", "not", "to", "send", "military", "forces", "into", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 14, 18, 25, 33, 37, 40, 45, 54, 61, 66, 71 ] }
{ "text": [ "Deshin Shekpa" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 20 ], "end": [ 32 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 3 ], "end": [ 4 ] } ] }
[ "Deshin Shekpa" ]
SQuAD
Chen Qingying, Professor of History and Director of the History Studies Institute under the China Tibetology Research Center in Beijing, writes that the Ming court conferred new official positions on ex-Yuan Tibetan leaders of the Phachu Kargyu and granted them lower-ranking positions. Of the county (zong or dzong) leaders of Neiwo Zong and Renbam Zong, Chen states that when "the Emperor learned the actual situation of the Phachu Kargyu, the Ming court then appointed the main Zong leaders to be senior officers of the Senior Command of Dbus and Gtsang." The official posts that the Ming court established in Tibet, such as senior and junior commanders, offices of Qianhu (in charge of 1,000 households), and offices of Wanhu (in charge of 10,000 households), were all hereditary positions according to Chen, but he asserts that "the succession of some important posts still had to be approved by the emperor," while old imperial mandates had to be returned to the Ming court for renewal.
{ "tokens": [ "Chen", "Qingying", ",", "Professor", "of", "History", "and", "Director", "of", "the", "History", "Studies", "Institute", "under", "the", "China", "Tibetology", "Research", "Center", "in", "Beijing", ",", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "court", "conferred", "new", "official", "positions", "on", "ex", "-", "Yuan", "Tibetan", "leaders", "of", "the", "Phachu", "Kargyu", "and", "granted", "them", "lower", "-", "ranking", "positions", ".", "Of", "the", "county", "(", "zong", "or", "dzong", ")", "leaders", "of", "Neiwo", "Zong", "and", "Renbam", "Zong", ",", "Chen", "states", "that", "when", "\"", "the", "Emperor", "learned", "the", "actual", "situation", "of", "the", "Phachu", "Kargyu", ",", "the", "Ming", "court", "then", "appointed", "the", "main", "Zong", "leaders", "to", "be", "senior", "officers", "of", "the", "Senior", "Command", "of", "Dbus", "and", "Gtsang", ".", "\"", "The", "official", "posts", "that", "the", "Ming", "court", "established", "in", "Tibet", ",", "such", "as", "senior", "and", "junior", "commanders", ",", "offices", "of", "Qianhu", "(", "in", "charge", "of", "1,000", "households", ")", ",", "and", "offices", "of", "Wanhu", "(", "in", "charge", "of", "10,000", "households", ")", ",", "were", "all", "hereditary", "positions", "according", "to", "Chen", ",", "but", "he", "asserts", "that", "\"", "the", "succession", "of", "some", "important", "posts", "still", "had", "to", "be", "approved", "by", "the", "emperor", ",", "\"", "while", "old", "imperial", "mandates", "had", "to", "be", "returned", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "for", "renewal", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 13, 15, 25, 28, 36, 40, 49, 52, 56, 64, 72, 82, 88, 92, 98, 109, 118, 125, 128, 135, 137, 144, 149, 153, 158, 164, 174, 178, 187, 197, 200, 202, 203, 208, 216, 224, 227, 231, 238, 245, 249, 257, 262, 267, 268, 276, 285, 287, 290, 294, 301, 302, 307, 310, 315, 317, 325, 328, 334, 339, 343, 350, 354, 356, 361, 368, 373, 378, 379, 383, 391, 399, 403, 410, 420, 423, 427, 434, 440, 442, 446, 451, 457, 462, 472, 476, 481, 486, 494, 497, 500, 507, 516, 519, 523, 530, 538, 541, 546, 550, 556, 557, 559, 563, 572, 578, 583, 587, 592, 598, 610, 613, 618, 620, 625, 628, 635, 639, 646, 656, 658, 666, 669, 676, 677, 680, 687, 690, 696, 706, 707, 709, 713, 721, 724, 730, 731, 734, 741, 744, 751, 761, 762, 764, 769, 773, 784, 794, 804, 807, 811, 813, 817, 820, 828, 833, 834, 838, 849, 852, 857, 867, 873, 879, 883, 886, 889, 898, 901, 905, 912, 913, 915, 921, 925, 934, 943, 947, 950, 953, 962, 965, 969, 974, 980, 984, 991 ] }
17ee828c14e948e58cbadb20979cb74b
Where is the China Tibetology Research Center located?
{ "tokens": [ "Where", "is", "the", "China", "Tibetology", "Research", "Center", "located", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 9, 13, 19, 30, 39, 46, 53 ] }
{ "text": [ "Beijing" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 128 ], "end": [ 134 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 20 ], "end": [ 20 ] } ] }
[ "Beijing" ]
SQuAD
Chen Qingying, Professor of History and Director of the History Studies Institute under the China Tibetology Research Center in Beijing, writes that the Ming court conferred new official positions on ex-Yuan Tibetan leaders of the Phachu Kargyu and granted them lower-ranking positions. Of the county (zong or dzong) leaders of Neiwo Zong and Renbam Zong, Chen states that when "the Emperor learned the actual situation of the Phachu Kargyu, the Ming court then appointed the main Zong leaders to be senior officers of the Senior Command of Dbus and Gtsang." The official posts that the Ming court established in Tibet, such as senior and junior commanders, offices of Qianhu (in charge of 1,000 households), and offices of Wanhu (in charge of 10,000 households), were all hereditary positions according to Chen, but he asserts that "the succession of some important posts still had to be approved by the emperor," while old imperial mandates had to be returned to the Ming court for renewal.
{ "tokens": [ "Chen", "Qingying", ",", "Professor", "of", "History", "and", "Director", "of", "the", "History", "Studies", "Institute", "under", "the", "China", "Tibetology", "Research", "Center", "in", "Beijing", ",", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "court", "conferred", "new", "official", "positions", "on", "ex", "-", "Yuan", "Tibetan", "leaders", "of", "the", "Phachu", "Kargyu", "and", "granted", "them", "lower", "-", "ranking", "positions", ".", "Of", "the", "county", "(", "zong", "or", "dzong", ")", "leaders", "of", "Neiwo", "Zong", "and", "Renbam", "Zong", ",", "Chen", "states", "that", "when", "\"", "the", "Emperor", "learned", "the", "actual", "situation", "of", "the", "Phachu", "Kargyu", ",", "the", "Ming", "court", "then", "appointed", "the", "main", "Zong", "leaders", "to", "be", "senior", "officers", "of", "the", "Senior", "Command", "of", "Dbus", "and", "Gtsang", ".", "\"", "The", "official", "posts", "that", "the", "Ming", "court", "established", "in", "Tibet", ",", "such", "as", "senior", "and", "junior", "commanders", ",", "offices", "of", "Qianhu", "(", "in", "charge", "of", "1,000", "households", ")", ",", "and", "offices", "of", "Wanhu", "(", "in", "charge", "of", "10,000", "households", ")", ",", "were", "all", "hereditary", "positions", "according", "to", "Chen", ",", "but", "he", "asserts", "that", "\"", "the", "succession", "of", "some", "important", "posts", "still", "had", "to", "be", "approved", "by", "the", "emperor", ",", "\"", "while", "old", "imperial", "mandates", "had", "to", "be", "returned", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "for", "renewal", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 13, 15, 25, 28, 36, 40, 49, 52, 56, 64, 72, 82, 88, 92, 98, 109, 118, 125, 128, 135, 137, 144, 149, 153, 158, 164, 174, 178, 187, 197, 200, 202, 203, 208, 216, 224, 227, 231, 238, 245, 249, 257, 262, 267, 268, 276, 285, 287, 290, 294, 301, 302, 307, 310, 315, 317, 325, 328, 334, 339, 343, 350, 354, 356, 361, 368, 373, 378, 379, 383, 391, 399, 403, 410, 420, 423, 427, 434, 440, 442, 446, 451, 457, 462, 472, 476, 481, 486, 494, 497, 500, 507, 516, 519, 523, 530, 538, 541, 546, 550, 556, 557, 559, 563, 572, 578, 583, 587, 592, 598, 610, 613, 618, 620, 625, 628, 635, 639, 646, 656, 658, 666, 669, 676, 677, 680, 687, 690, 696, 706, 707, 709, 713, 721, 724, 730, 731, 734, 741, 744, 751, 761, 762, 764, 769, 773, 784, 794, 804, 807, 811, 813, 817, 820, 828, 833, 834, 838, 849, 852, 857, 867, 873, 879, 883, 886, 889, 898, 901, 905, 912, 913, 915, 921, 925, 934, 943, 947, 950, 953, 962, 965, 969, 974, 980, 984, 991 ] }
93c706faf4bf4b19801840315b2f108c
Who was the Director of the History Studies Institute?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "was", "the", "Director", "of", "the", "History", "Studies", "Institute", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 21, 24, 28, 36, 44, 53 ] }
{ "text": [ "Chen Qingying" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 0 ], "end": [ 12 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 0 ], "end": [ 1 ] } ] }
[ "Chen Qingying" ]
SQuAD
Chen Qingying, Professor of History and Director of the History Studies Institute under the China Tibetology Research Center in Beijing, writes that the Ming court conferred new official positions on ex-Yuan Tibetan leaders of the Phachu Kargyu and granted them lower-ranking positions. Of the county (zong or dzong) leaders of Neiwo Zong and Renbam Zong, Chen states that when "the Emperor learned the actual situation of the Phachu Kargyu, the Ming court then appointed the main Zong leaders to be senior officers of the Senior Command of Dbus and Gtsang." The official posts that the Ming court established in Tibet, such as senior and junior commanders, offices of Qianhu (in charge of 1,000 households), and offices of Wanhu (in charge of 10,000 households), were all hereditary positions according to Chen, but he asserts that "the succession of some important posts still had to be approved by the emperor," while old imperial mandates had to be returned to the Ming court for renewal.
{ "tokens": [ "Chen", "Qingying", ",", "Professor", "of", "History", "and", "Director", "of", "the", "History", "Studies", "Institute", "under", "the", "China", "Tibetology", "Research", "Center", "in", "Beijing", ",", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "court", "conferred", "new", "official", "positions", "on", "ex", "-", "Yuan", "Tibetan", "leaders", "of", "the", "Phachu", "Kargyu", "and", "granted", "them", "lower", "-", "ranking", "positions", ".", "Of", "the", "county", "(", "zong", "or", "dzong", ")", "leaders", "of", "Neiwo", "Zong", "and", "Renbam", "Zong", ",", "Chen", "states", "that", "when", "\"", "the", "Emperor", "learned", "the", "actual", "situation", "of", "the", "Phachu", "Kargyu", ",", "the", "Ming", "court", "then", "appointed", "the", "main", "Zong", "leaders", "to", "be", "senior", "officers", "of", "the", "Senior", "Command", "of", "Dbus", "and", "Gtsang", ".", "\"", "The", "official", "posts", "that", "the", "Ming", "court", "established", "in", "Tibet", ",", "such", "as", "senior", "and", "junior", "commanders", ",", "offices", "of", "Qianhu", "(", "in", "charge", "of", "1,000", "households", ")", ",", "and", "offices", "of", "Wanhu", "(", "in", "charge", "of", "10,000", "households", ")", ",", "were", "all", "hereditary", "positions", "according", "to", "Chen", ",", "but", "he", "asserts", "that", "\"", "the", "succession", "of", "some", "important", "posts", "still", "had", "to", "be", "approved", "by", "the", "emperor", ",", "\"", "while", "old", "imperial", "mandates", "had", "to", "be", "returned", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "for", "renewal", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 13, 15, 25, 28, 36, 40, 49, 52, 56, 64, 72, 82, 88, 92, 98, 109, 118, 125, 128, 135, 137, 144, 149, 153, 158, 164, 174, 178, 187, 197, 200, 202, 203, 208, 216, 224, 227, 231, 238, 245, 249, 257, 262, 267, 268, 276, 285, 287, 290, 294, 301, 302, 307, 310, 315, 317, 325, 328, 334, 339, 343, 350, 354, 356, 361, 368, 373, 378, 379, 383, 391, 399, 403, 410, 420, 423, 427, 434, 440, 442, 446, 451, 457, 462, 472, 476, 481, 486, 494, 497, 500, 507, 516, 519, 523, 530, 538, 541, 546, 550, 556, 557, 559, 563, 572, 578, 583, 587, 592, 598, 610, 613, 618, 620, 625, 628, 635, 639, 646, 656, 658, 666, 669, 676, 677, 680, 687, 690, 696, 706, 707, 709, 713, 721, 724, 730, 731, 734, 741, 744, 751, 761, 762, 764, 769, 773, 784, 794, 804, 807, 811, 813, 817, 820, 828, 833, 834, 838, 849, 852, 857, 867, 873, 879, 883, 886, 889, 898, 901, 905, 912, 913, 915, 921, 925, 934, 943, 947, 950, 953, 962, 965, 969, 974, 980, 984, 991 ] }
f119ea78185f43da869923a3a5e37283
How many households were the offices of Qianhu in charge of?
{ "tokens": [ "How", "many", "households", "were", "the", "offices", "of", "Qianhu", "in", "charge", "of", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 20, 25, 29, 37, 40, 47, 50, 57, 59 ] }
{ "text": [ "1,000 households" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 690 ], "end": [ 705 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 129 ], "end": [ 130 ] } ] }
[ "1,000 households" ]
SQuAD
Chen Qingying, Professor of History and Director of the History Studies Institute under the China Tibetology Research Center in Beijing, writes that the Ming court conferred new official positions on ex-Yuan Tibetan leaders of the Phachu Kargyu and granted them lower-ranking positions. Of the county (zong or dzong) leaders of Neiwo Zong and Renbam Zong, Chen states that when "the Emperor learned the actual situation of the Phachu Kargyu, the Ming court then appointed the main Zong leaders to be senior officers of the Senior Command of Dbus and Gtsang." The official posts that the Ming court established in Tibet, such as senior and junior commanders, offices of Qianhu (in charge of 1,000 households), and offices of Wanhu (in charge of 10,000 households), were all hereditary positions according to Chen, but he asserts that "the succession of some important posts still had to be approved by the emperor," while old imperial mandates had to be returned to the Ming court for renewal.
{ "tokens": [ "Chen", "Qingying", ",", "Professor", "of", "History", "and", "Director", "of", "the", "History", "Studies", "Institute", "under", "the", "China", "Tibetology", "Research", "Center", "in", "Beijing", ",", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "court", "conferred", "new", "official", "positions", "on", "ex", "-", "Yuan", "Tibetan", "leaders", "of", "the", "Phachu", "Kargyu", "and", "granted", "them", "lower", "-", "ranking", "positions", ".", "Of", "the", "county", "(", "zong", "or", "dzong", ")", "leaders", "of", "Neiwo", "Zong", "and", "Renbam", "Zong", ",", "Chen", "states", "that", "when", "\"", "the", "Emperor", "learned", "the", "actual", "situation", "of", "the", "Phachu", "Kargyu", ",", "the", "Ming", "court", "then", "appointed", "the", "main", "Zong", "leaders", "to", "be", "senior", "officers", "of", "the", "Senior", "Command", "of", "Dbus", "and", "Gtsang", ".", "\"", "The", "official", "posts", "that", "the", "Ming", "court", "established", "in", "Tibet", ",", "such", "as", "senior", "and", "junior", "commanders", ",", "offices", "of", "Qianhu", "(", "in", "charge", "of", "1,000", "households", ")", ",", "and", "offices", "of", "Wanhu", "(", "in", "charge", "of", "10,000", "households", ")", ",", "were", "all", "hereditary", "positions", "according", "to", "Chen", ",", "but", "he", "asserts", "that", "\"", "the", "succession", "of", "some", "important", "posts", "still", "had", "to", "be", "approved", "by", "the", "emperor", ",", "\"", "while", "old", "imperial", "mandates", "had", "to", "be", "returned", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "for", "renewal", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 13, 15, 25, 28, 36, 40, 49, 52, 56, 64, 72, 82, 88, 92, 98, 109, 118, 125, 128, 135, 137, 144, 149, 153, 158, 164, 174, 178, 187, 197, 200, 202, 203, 208, 216, 224, 227, 231, 238, 245, 249, 257, 262, 267, 268, 276, 285, 287, 290, 294, 301, 302, 307, 310, 315, 317, 325, 328, 334, 339, 343, 350, 354, 356, 361, 368, 373, 378, 379, 383, 391, 399, 403, 410, 420, 423, 427, 434, 440, 442, 446, 451, 457, 462, 472, 476, 481, 486, 494, 497, 500, 507, 516, 519, 523, 530, 538, 541, 546, 550, 556, 557, 559, 563, 572, 578, 583, 587, 592, 598, 610, 613, 618, 620, 625, 628, 635, 639, 646, 656, 658, 666, 669, 676, 677, 680, 687, 690, 696, 706, 707, 709, 713, 721, 724, 730, 731, 734, 741, 744, 751, 761, 762, 764, 769, 773, 784, 794, 804, 807, 811, 813, 817, 820, 828, 833, 834, 838, 849, 852, 857, 867, 873, 879, 883, 886, 889, 898, 901, 905, 912, 913, 915, 921, 925, 934, 943, 947, 950, 953, 962, 965, 969, 974, 980, 984, 991 ] }
8f2ae3f0197b47c281f17559a571ace3
How many households were the offices of Wanhu in charge of?
{ "tokens": [ "How", "many", "households", "were", "the", "offices", "of", "Wanhu", "in", "charge", "of", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 9, 20, 25, 29, 37, 40, 46, 49, 56, 58 ] }
{ "text": [ "10,000 households" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 744 ], "end": [ 760 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 141 ], "end": [ 142 ] } ] }
[ "10,000 households" ]
SQuAD
The Information Office of the State Council of the PRC preserves an edict of the Zhengtong Emperor (r. 1435–1449) addressed to the Karmapa in 1445, written after the latter's agent had brought holy relics to the Ming court. Zhengtong had the following message delivered to the Great Treasure Prince of Dharma, the Karmapa:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Information", "Office", "of", "the", "State", "Council", "of", "the", "PRC", "preserves", "an", "edict", "of", "the", "Zhengtong", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1435–1449", ")", "addressed", "to", "the", "Karmapa", "in", "1445", ",", "written", "after", "the", "latter", "'s", "agent", "had", "brought", "holy", "relics", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", ".", "Zhengtong", "had", "the", "following", "message", "delivered", "to", "the", "Great", "Treasure", "Prince", "of", "Dharma", ",", "the", "Karmapa", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 16, 23, 26, 30, 36, 44, 47, 51, 55, 65, 68, 74, 77, 81, 91, 99, 100, 103, 112, 114, 124, 127, 131, 139, 142, 146, 148, 156, 162, 166, 172, 175, 181, 185, 193, 198, 205, 208, 212, 217, 222, 224, 234, 238, 242, 252, 260, 270, 273, 277, 283, 292, 299, 302, 308, 310, 314, 321 ] }
e4adcdff89044ec49084b6449d83ebfe
What years did the Zhengtong Emperor reign?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "years", "did", "the", "Zhengtong", "Emperor", "reign", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 11, 15, 19, 29, 37, 42 ] }
{ "text": [ "1435–1449" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 103 ], "end": [ 111 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 19 ], "end": [ 19 ] } ] }
[ "1435–1449" ]
SQuAD
The Information Office of the State Council of the PRC preserves an edict of the Zhengtong Emperor (r. 1435–1449) addressed to the Karmapa in 1445, written after the latter's agent had brought holy relics to the Ming court. Zhengtong had the following message delivered to the Great Treasure Prince of Dharma, the Karmapa:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Information", "Office", "of", "the", "State", "Council", "of", "the", "PRC", "preserves", "an", "edict", "of", "the", "Zhengtong", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1435–1449", ")", "addressed", "to", "the", "Karmapa", "in", "1445", ",", "written", "after", "the", "latter", "'s", "agent", "had", "brought", "holy", "relics", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", ".", "Zhengtong", "had", "the", "following", "message", "delivered", "to", "the", "Great", "Treasure", "Prince", "of", "Dharma", ",", "the", "Karmapa", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 16, 23, 26, 30, 36, 44, 47, 51, 55, 65, 68, 74, 77, 81, 91, 99, 100, 103, 112, 114, 124, 127, 131, 139, 142, 146, 148, 156, 162, 166, 172, 175, 181, 185, 193, 198, 205, 208, 212, 217, 222, 224, 234, 238, 242, 252, 260, 270, 273, 277, 283, 292, 299, 302, 308, 310, 314, 321 ] }
57fd07c3596c49fa8312ac3bc5913d39
Who maintains an edict of the Zhengtong Emperor?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "maintains", "an", "edict", "of", "the", "Zhengtong", "Emperor", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 14, 17, 23, 26, 30, 40, 47 ] }
{ "text": [ "The Information Office of the State Council of the PRC" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 4 ], "end": [ 53 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 1 ], "end": [ 9 ] } ] }
[ "The Information Office of the State Council of the PRC" ]
SQuAD
The Information Office of the State Council of the PRC preserves an edict of the Zhengtong Emperor (r. 1435–1449) addressed to the Karmapa in 1445, written after the latter's agent had brought holy relics to the Ming court. Zhengtong had the following message delivered to the Great Treasure Prince of Dharma, the Karmapa:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Information", "Office", "of", "the", "State", "Council", "of", "the", "PRC", "preserves", "an", "edict", "of", "the", "Zhengtong", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1435–1449", ")", "addressed", "to", "the", "Karmapa", "in", "1445", ",", "written", "after", "the", "latter", "'s", "agent", "had", "brought", "holy", "relics", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", ".", "Zhengtong", "had", "the", "following", "message", "delivered", "to", "the", "Great", "Treasure", "Prince", "of", "Dharma", ",", "the", "Karmapa", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 16, 23, 26, 30, 36, 44, 47, 51, 55, 65, 68, 74, 77, 81, 91, 99, 100, 103, 112, 114, 124, 127, 131, 139, 142, 146, 148, 156, 162, 166, 172, 175, 181, 185, 193, 198, 205, 208, 212, 217, 222, 224, 234, 238, 242, 252, 260, 270, 273, 277, 283, 292, 299, 302, 308, 310, 314, 321 ] }
b7e3a849074149c68418e588dbe9656d
Who was the edict addressed to?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "was", "the", "edict", "addressed", "to", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 18, 28, 30 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Karmapa" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 127 ], "end": [ 137 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 23 ], "end": [ 24 ] } ] }
[ "the Karmapa" ]
SQuAD
The Information Office of the State Council of the PRC preserves an edict of the Zhengtong Emperor (r. 1435–1449) addressed to the Karmapa in 1445, written after the latter's agent had brought holy relics to the Ming court. Zhengtong had the following message delivered to the Great Treasure Prince of Dharma, the Karmapa:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Information", "Office", "of", "the", "State", "Council", "of", "the", "PRC", "preserves", "an", "edict", "of", "the", "Zhengtong", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1435–1449", ")", "addressed", "to", "the", "Karmapa", "in", "1445", ",", "written", "after", "the", "latter", "'s", "agent", "had", "brought", "holy", "relics", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", ".", "Zhengtong", "had", "the", "following", "message", "delivered", "to", "the", "Great", "Treasure", "Prince", "of", "Dharma", ",", "the", "Karmapa", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 16, 23, 26, 30, 36, 44, 47, 51, 55, 65, 68, 74, 77, 81, 91, 99, 100, 103, 112, 114, 124, 127, 131, 139, 142, 146, 148, 156, 162, 166, 172, 175, 181, 185, 193, 198, 205, 208, 212, 217, 222, 224, 234, 238, 242, 252, 260, 270, 273, 277, 283, 292, 299, 302, 308, 310, 314, 321 ] }
7465702eda1046f1a11e3f999f4625e4
Who had a message delivered to them by Zhengtong?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "had", "a", "message", "delivered", "to", "them", "by", "Zhengtong", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 10, 18, 28, 31, 36, 39, 48 ] }
{ "text": [ "Great Treasure Prince of Dharma" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 277 ], "end": [ 307 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 51 ], "end": [ 55 ] } ] }
[ "Great Treasure Prince of Dharma" ]
SQuAD
The Information Office of the State Council of the PRC preserves an edict of the Zhengtong Emperor (r. 1435–1449) addressed to the Karmapa in 1445, written after the latter's agent had brought holy relics to the Ming court. Zhengtong had the following message delivered to the Great Treasure Prince of Dharma, the Karmapa:
{ "tokens": [ "The", "Information", "Office", "of", "the", "State", "Council", "of", "the", "PRC", "preserves", "an", "edict", "of", "the", "Zhengtong", "Emperor", "(", "r.", "1435–1449", ")", "addressed", "to", "the", "Karmapa", "in", "1445", ",", "written", "after", "the", "latter", "'s", "agent", "had", "brought", "holy", "relics", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", ".", "Zhengtong", "had", "the", "following", "message", "delivered", "to", "the", "Great", "Treasure", "Prince", "of", "Dharma", ",", "the", "Karmapa", ":" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 16, 23, 26, 30, 36, 44, 47, 51, 55, 65, 68, 74, 77, 81, 91, 99, 100, 103, 112, 114, 124, 127, 131, 139, 142, 146, 148, 156, 162, 166, 172, 175, 181, 185, 193, 198, 205, 208, 212, 217, 222, 224, 234, 238, 242, 252, 260, 270, 273, 277, 283, 292, 299, 302, 308, 310, 314, 321 ] }
c6a257dd48a845dea8d4a22e0d742c9c
When was the edict written?
{ "tokens": [ "When", "was", "the", "edict", "written", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 13, 19, 26 ] }
{ "text": [ "after the latter's agent had brought holy relics to the Ming court" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 156 ], "end": [ 221 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 29 ], "end": [ 41 ] } ] }
[ "after the latter's agent had brought holy relics to the Ming court" ]
SQuAD
Chopin's music is frequently played with rubato, "the practice in performance of disregarding strict time, 'robbing' some note-values for expressive effect". There are differing opinions as to how much, and what type, of rubato is appropriate for his works. Charles Rosen comments that "most of the written-out indications of rubato in Chopin are to be found in his mazurkas ... It is probable that Chopin used the older form of rubato so important to Mozart ... [where] the melody note in the right hand is delayed until after the note in the bass ... An allied form of this rubato is the arpeggiation of the chords thereby delaying the melody note; according to Chopin's pupil, Karol Mikuli, Chopin was firmly opposed to this practice."
{ "tokens": [ "Chopin", "'s", "music", "is", "frequently", "played", "with", "rubato", ",", "\"", "the", "practice", "in", "performance", "of", "disregarding", "strict", "time", ",", "'", "robbing", "'", "some", "note", "-", "values", "for", "expressive", "effect", "\"", ".", "There", "are", "differing", "opinions", "as", "to", "how", "much", ",", "and", "what", "type", ",", "of", "rubato", "is", "appropriate", "for", "his", "works", ".", "Charles", "Rosen", "comments", "that", "\"", "most", "of", "the", "written", "-", "out", "indications", "of", "rubato", "in", "Chopin", "are", "to", "be", "found", "in", "his", "mazurkas", "...", "It", "is", "probable", "that", "Chopin", "used", "the", "older", "form", "of", "rubato", "so", "important", "to", "Mozart", "...", "[", "where", "]", "the", "melody", "note", "in", "the", "right", "hand", "is", "delayed", "until", "after", "the", "note", "in", "the", "bass", "...", "An", "allied", "form", "of", "this", "rubato", "is", "the", "arpeggiation", "of", "the", "chords", "thereby", "delaying", "the", "melody", "note", ";", "according", "to", "Chopin", "'s", "pupil", ",", "Karol", "Mikuli", ",", "Chopin", "was", "firmly", "opposed", "to", "this", "practice", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 9, 15, 18, 29, 36, 41, 47, 49, 50, 54, 63, 66, 78, 81, 94, 101, 105, 107, 108, 115, 117, 122, 126, 127, 134, 138, 149, 155, 156, 158, 164, 168, 178, 187, 190, 193, 197, 201, 203, 207, 212, 216, 218, 221, 228, 231, 243, 247, 251, 256, 258, 266, 272, 281, 286, 287, 292, 295, 299, 306, 307, 311, 323, 326, 333, 336, 343, 347, 350, 353, 359, 362, 366, 375, 379, 382, 385, 394, 399, 406, 411, 415, 421, 426, 429, 436, 439, 449, 452, 459, 463, 464, 469, 471, 475, 482, 487, 490, 494, 500, 505, 508, 516, 522, 528, 532, 537, 540, 544, 549, 553, 556, 563, 568, 571, 576, 583, 586, 590, 603, 606, 610, 617, 625, 634, 638, 645, 649, 651, 661, 664, 670, 673, 678, 680, 686, 692, 694, 701, 705, 712, 720, 723, 728, 736, 737 ] }
08f4c9758f374eecbbc09835b6c2e1e5
Chopin's compositions are often played with what?
{ "tokens": [ "Chopin", "'s", "compositions", "are", "often", "played", "with", "what", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 9, 22, 26, 32, 39, 44, 48 ] }
{ "text": [ "rubato" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 41 ], "end": [ 46 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 7 ], "end": [ 7 ] } ] }
[ "rubato" ]
SQuAD
Chopin's music is frequently played with rubato, "the practice in performance of disregarding strict time, 'robbing' some note-values for expressive effect". There are differing opinions as to how much, and what type, of rubato is appropriate for his works. Charles Rosen comments that "most of the written-out indications of rubato in Chopin are to be found in his mazurkas ... It is probable that Chopin used the older form of rubato so important to Mozart ... [where] the melody note in the right hand is delayed until after the note in the bass ... An allied form of this rubato is the arpeggiation of the chords thereby delaying the melody note; according to Chopin's pupil, Karol Mikuli, Chopin was firmly opposed to this practice."
{ "tokens": [ "Chopin", "'s", "music", "is", "frequently", "played", "with", "rubato", ",", "\"", "the", "practice", "in", "performance", "of", "disregarding", "strict", "time", ",", "'", "robbing", "'", "some", "note", "-", "values", "for", "expressive", "effect", "\"", ".", "There", "are", "differing", "opinions", "as", "to", "how", "much", ",", "and", "what", "type", ",", "of", "rubato", "is", "appropriate", "for", "his", "works", ".", "Charles", "Rosen", "comments", "that", "\"", "most", "of", "the", "written", "-", "out", "indications", "of", "rubato", "in", "Chopin", "are", "to", "be", "found", "in", "his", "mazurkas", "...", "It", "is", "probable", "that", "Chopin", "used", "the", "older", "form", "of", "rubato", "so", "important", "to", "Mozart", "...", "[", "where", "]", "the", "melody", "note", "in", "the", "right", "hand", "is", "delayed", "until", "after", "the", "note", "in", "the", "bass", "...", "An", "allied", "form", "of", "this", "rubato", "is", "the", "arpeggiation", "of", "the", "chords", "thereby", "delaying", "the", "melody", "note", ";", "according", "to", "Chopin", "'s", "pupil", ",", "Karol", "Mikuli", ",", "Chopin", "was", "firmly", "opposed", "to", "this", "practice", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 9, 15, 18, 29, 36, 41, 47, 49, 50, 54, 63, 66, 78, 81, 94, 101, 105, 107, 108, 115, 117, 122, 126, 127, 134, 138, 149, 155, 156, 158, 164, 168, 178, 187, 190, 193, 197, 201, 203, 207, 212, 216, 218, 221, 228, 231, 243, 247, 251, 256, 258, 266, 272, 281, 286, 287, 292, 295, 299, 306, 307, 311, 323, 326, 333, 336, 343, 347, 350, 353, 359, 362, 366, 375, 379, 382, 385, 394, 399, 406, 411, 415, 421, 426, 429, 436, 439, 449, 452, 459, 463, 464, 469, 471, 475, 482, 487, 490, 494, 500, 505, 508, 516, 522, 528, 532, 537, 540, 544, 549, 553, 556, 563, 568, 571, 576, 583, 586, 590, 603, 606, 610, 617, 625, 634, 638, 645, 649, 651, 661, 664, 670, 673, 678, 680, 686, 692, 694, 701, 705, 712, 720, 723, 728, 736, 737 ] }
4e8c1b1b87424ecc8140d17e144a46b6
What does rubato mean?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "does", "rubato", "mean", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 10, 17, 21 ] }
{ "text": [ "the practice in performance of disregarding strict time" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 50 ], "end": [ 104 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 10 ], "end": [ 17 ] } ] }
[ "the practice in performance of disregarding strict time" ]
SQuAD
Chopin's music is frequently played with rubato, "the practice in performance of disregarding strict time, 'robbing' some note-values for expressive effect". There are differing opinions as to how much, and what type, of rubato is appropriate for his works. Charles Rosen comments that "most of the written-out indications of rubato in Chopin are to be found in his mazurkas ... It is probable that Chopin used the older form of rubato so important to Mozart ... [where] the melody note in the right hand is delayed until after the note in the bass ... An allied form of this rubato is the arpeggiation of the chords thereby delaying the melody note; according to Chopin's pupil, Karol Mikuli, Chopin was firmly opposed to this practice."
{ "tokens": [ "Chopin", "'s", "music", "is", "frequently", "played", "with", "rubato", ",", "\"", "the", "practice", "in", "performance", "of", "disregarding", "strict", "time", ",", "'", "robbing", "'", "some", "note", "-", "values", "for", "expressive", "effect", "\"", ".", "There", "are", "differing", "opinions", "as", "to", "how", "much", ",", "and", "what", "type", ",", "of", "rubato", "is", "appropriate", "for", "his", "works", ".", "Charles", "Rosen", "comments", "that", "\"", "most", "of", "the", "written", "-", "out", "indications", "of", "rubato", "in", "Chopin", "are", "to", "be", "found", "in", "his", "mazurkas", "...", "It", "is", "probable", "that", "Chopin", "used", "the", "older", "form", "of", "rubato", "so", "important", "to", "Mozart", "...", "[", "where", "]", "the", "melody", "note", "in", "the", "right", "hand", "is", "delayed", "until", "after", "the", "note", "in", "the", "bass", "...", "An", "allied", "form", "of", "this", "rubato", "is", "the", "arpeggiation", "of", "the", "chords", "thereby", "delaying", "the", "melody", "note", ";", "according", "to", "Chopin", "'s", "pupil", ",", "Karol", "Mikuli", ",", "Chopin", "was", "firmly", "opposed", "to", "this", "practice", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 9, 15, 18, 29, 36, 41, 47, 49, 50, 54, 63, 66, 78, 81, 94, 101, 105, 107, 108, 115, 117, 122, 126, 127, 134, 138, 149, 155, 156, 158, 164, 168, 178, 187, 190, 193, 197, 201, 203, 207, 212, 216, 218, 221, 228, 231, 243, 247, 251, 256, 258, 266, 272, 281, 286, 287, 292, 295, 299, 306, 307, 311, 323, 326, 333, 336, 343, 347, 350, 353, 359, 362, 366, 375, 379, 382, 385, 394, 399, 406, 411, 415, 421, 426, 429, 436, 439, 449, 452, 459, 463, 464, 469, 471, 475, 482, 487, 490, 494, 500, 505, 508, 516, 522, 528, 532, 537, 540, 544, 549, 553, 556, 563, 568, 571, 576, 583, 586, 590, 603, 606, 610, 617, 625, 634, 638, 645, 649, 651, 661, 664, 670, 673, 678, 680, 686, 692, 694, 701, 705, 712, 720, 723, 728, 736, 737 ] }
f8f5a47580ea41f98b03e619744986f7
In Chopin's music where strict timing is disregarded, what is it called?
{ "tokens": [ "In", "Chopin", "'s", "music", "where", "strict", "timing", "is", "disregarded", ",", "what", "is", "it", "called", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 3, 9, 12, 18, 24, 31, 38, 41, 52, 54, 59, 62, 65, 71 ] }
{ "text": [ "rubato" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 41 ], "end": [ 46 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 7 ], "end": [ 7 ] } ] }
[ "rubato" ]
SQuAD
Chopin's music is frequently played with rubato, "the practice in performance of disregarding strict time, 'robbing' some note-values for expressive effect". There are differing opinions as to how much, and what type, of rubato is appropriate for his works. Charles Rosen comments that "most of the written-out indications of rubato in Chopin are to be found in his mazurkas ... It is probable that Chopin used the older form of rubato so important to Mozart ... [where] the melody note in the right hand is delayed until after the note in the bass ... An allied form of this rubato is the arpeggiation of the chords thereby delaying the melody note; according to Chopin's pupil, Karol Mikuli, Chopin was firmly opposed to this practice."
{ "tokens": [ "Chopin", "'s", "music", "is", "frequently", "played", "with", "rubato", ",", "\"", "the", "practice", "in", "performance", "of", "disregarding", "strict", "time", ",", "'", "robbing", "'", "some", "note", "-", "values", "for", "expressive", "effect", "\"", ".", "There", "are", "differing", "opinions", "as", "to", "how", "much", ",", "and", "what", "type", ",", "of", "rubato", "is", "appropriate", "for", "his", "works", ".", "Charles", "Rosen", "comments", "that", "\"", "most", "of", "the", "written", "-", "out", "indications", "of", "rubato", "in", "Chopin", "are", "to", "be", "found", "in", "his", "mazurkas", "...", "It", "is", "probable", "that", "Chopin", "used", "the", "older", "form", "of", "rubato", "so", "important", "to", "Mozart", "...", "[", "where", "]", "the", "melody", "note", "in", "the", "right", "hand", "is", "delayed", "until", "after", "the", "note", "in", "the", "bass", "...", "An", "allied", "form", "of", "this", "rubato", "is", "the", "arpeggiation", "of", "the", "chords", "thereby", "delaying", "the", "melody", "note", ";", "according", "to", "Chopin", "'s", "pupil", ",", "Karol", "Mikuli", ",", "Chopin", "was", "firmly", "opposed", "to", "this", "practice", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 6, 9, 15, 18, 29, 36, 41, 47, 49, 50, 54, 63, 66, 78, 81, 94, 101, 105, 107, 108, 115, 117, 122, 126, 127, 134, 138, 149, 155, 156, 158, 164, 168, 178, 187, 190, 193, 197, 201, 203, 207, 212, 216, 218, 221, 228, 231, 243, 247, 251, 256, 258, 266, 272, 281, 286, 287, 292, 295, 299, 306, 307, 311, 323, 326, 333, 336, 343, 347, 350, 353, 359, 362, 366, 375, 379, 382, 385, 394, 399, 406, 411, 415, 421, 426, 429, 436, 439, 449, 452, 459, 463, 464, 469, 471, 475, 482, 487, 490, 494, 500, 505, 508, 516, 522, 528, 532, 537, 540, 544, 549, 553, 556, 563, 568, 571, 576, 583, 586, 590, 603, 606, 610, 617, 625, 634, 638, 645, 649, 651, 661, 664, 670, 673, 678, 680, 686, 692, 694, 701, 705, 712, 720, 723, 728, 736, 737 ] }
f354fe4d68f04f0187182af106458ecb
What type of Chopin's music had the most disregard for strict timing according to Charles Rosen?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "type", "of", "Chopin", "'s", "music", "had", "the", "most", "disregard", "for", "strict", "timing", "according", "to", "Charles", "Rosen", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 10, 13, 19, 22, 28, 32, 36, 41, 51, 55, 62, 69, 79, 82, 90, 95 ] }
{ "text": [ "mazurkas" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 366 ], "end": [ 373 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 74 ], "end": [ 74 ] } ] }
[ "mazurkas" ]
SQuAD
Marsha Weidner states that Deshin Shekpa's miracles "testified to the power of both the emperor and his guru and served as a legitimizing tool for the emperor's problematic succession to the throne," referring to the Yongle Emperor's conflict with the previous Jianwen Emperor. Tsai writes that Deshin Shekpa aided the legitimacy of the Yongle Emperor's rule by providing him with portents and omens which demonstrated Heaven's favor of the Yongle Emperor on the Ming throne.
{ "tokens": [ "Marsha", "Weidner", "states", "that", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "'s", "miracles", "\"", "testified", "to", "the", "power", "of", "both", "the", "emperor", "and", "his", "guru", "and", "served", "as", "a", "legitimizing", "tool", "for", "the", "emperor", "'s", "problematic", "succession", "to", "the", "throne", ",", "\"", "referring", "to", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "conflict", "with", "the", "previous", "Jianwen", "Emperor", ".", "Tsai", "writes", "that", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "aided", "the", "legitimacy", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "rule", "by", "providing", "him", "with", "portents", "and", "omens", "which", "demonstrated", "Heaven", "'s", "favor", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "on", "the", "Ming", "throne", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 15, 22, 27, 34, 40, 43, 52, 53, 63, 66, 70, 76, 79, 84, 88, 96, 100, 104, 109, 113, 120, 123, 125, 138, 143, 147, 151, 158, 161, 173, 184, 187, 191, 197, 198, 200, 210, 213, 217, 224, 231, 234, 243, 248, 252, 261, 269, 276, 278, 283, 290, 295, 302, 309, 315, 319, 330, 333, 337, 344, 351, 354, 359, 362, 372, 376, 381, 390, 394, 400, 406, 419, 425, 428, 434, 437, 441, 448, 456, 459, 463, 468, 474 ] }
680e0cb07d5e499d9eca9ce909ecc87b
Who did the Yongle Emperor have a conflict with?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "did", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "have", "a", "conflict", "with", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 12, 19, 27, 32, 34, 43, 47 ] }
{ "text": [ "Jianwen Emperor" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 261 ], "end": [ 275 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 47 ], "end": [ 48 ] } ] }
[ "Jianwen Emperor" ]
SQuAD
Marsha Weidner states that Deshin Shekpa's miracles "testified to the power of both the emperor and his guru and served as a legitimizing tool for the emperor's problematic succession to the throne," referring to the Yongle Emperor's conflict with the previous Jianwen Emperor. Tsai writes that Deshin Shekpa aided the legitimacy of the Yongle Emperor's rule by providing him with portents and omens which demonstrated Heaven's favor of the Yongle Emperor on the Ming throne.
{ "tokens": [ "Marsha", "Weidner", "states", "that", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "'s", "miracles", "\"", "testified", "to", "the", "power", "of", "both", "the", "emperor", "and", "his", "guru", "and", "served", "as", "a", "legitimizing", "tool", "for", "the", "emperor", "'s", "problematic", "succession", "to", "the", "throne", ",", "\"", "referring", "to", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "conflict", "with", "the", "previous", "Jianwen", "Emperor", ".", "Tsai", "writes", "that", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "aided", "the", "legitimacy", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "rule", "by", "providing", "him", "with", "portents", "and", "omens", "which", "demonstrated", "Heaven", "'s", "favor", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "on", "the", "Ming", "throne", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 15, 22, 27, 34, 40, 43, 52, 53, 63, 66, 70, 76, 79, 84, 88, 96, 100, 104, 109, 113, 120, 123, 125, 138, 143, 147, 151, 158, 161, 173, 184, 187, 191, 197, 198, 200, 210, 213, 217, 224, 231, 234, 243, 248, 252, 261, 269, 276, 278, 283, 290, 295, 302, 309, 315, 319, 330, 333, 337, 344, 351, 354, 359, 362, 372, 376, 381, 390, 394, 400, 406, 419, 425, 428, 434, 437, 441, 448, 456, 459, 463, 468, 474 ] }
6d2a2b40ba6247678de944176020b5ed
Who aided the legitimacy of the Yongle Emperor's rule?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "aided", "the", "legitimacy", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "rule", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 10, 14, 25, 28, 32, 39, 46, 49, 53 ] }
{ "text": [ "Deshin Shekpa" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 27 ], "end": [ 39 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 4 ], "end": [ 5 ] } ] }
[ "Deshin Shekpa" ]
SQuAD
Marsha Weidner states that Deshin Shekpa's miracles "testified to the power of both the emperor and his guru and served as a legitimizing tool for the emperor's problematic succession to the throne," referring to the Yongle Emperor's conflict with the previous Jianwen Emperor. Tsai writes that Deshin Shekpa aided the legitimacy of the Yongle Emperor's rule by providing him with portents and omens which demonstrated Heaven's favor of the Yongle Emperor on the Ming throne.
{ "tokens": [ "Marsha", "Weidner", "states", "that", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "'s", "miracles", "\"", "testified", "to", "the", "power", "of", "both", "the", "emperor", "and", "his", "guru", "and", "served", "as", "a", "legitimizing", "tool", "for", "the", "emperor", "'s", "problematic", "succession", "to", "the", "throne", ",", "\"", "referring", "to", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "conflict", "with", "the", "previous", "Jianwen", "Emperor", ".", "Tsai", "writes", "that", "Deshin", "Shekpa", "aided", "the", "legitimacy", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "rule", "by", "providing", "him", "with", "portents", "and", "omens", "which", "demonstrated", "Heaven", "'s", "favor", "of", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "on", "the", "Ming", "throne", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 15, 22, 27, 34, 40, 43, 52, 53, 63, 66, 70, 76, 79, 84, 88, 96, 100, 104, 109, 113, 120, 123, 125, 138, 143, 147, 151, 158, 161, 173, 184, 187, 191, 197, 198, 200, 210, 213, 217, 224, 231, 234, 243, 248, 252, 261, 269, 276, 278, 283, 290, 295, 302, 309, 315, 319, 330, 333, 337, 344, 351, 354, 359, 362, 372, 376, 381, 390, 394, 400, 406, 419, 425, 428, 434, 437, 441, 448, 456, 459, 463, 468, 474 ] }
8e3bd9556ca447aaa21c23699bf50598
What served as a legitimizing tool for the emperor's succession to the throne?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "served", "as", "a", "legitimizing", "tool", "for", "the", "emperor", "'s", "succession", "to", "the", "throne", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 12, 15, 17, 30, 35, 39, 43, 50, 53, 64, 67, 71, 77 ] }
{ "text": [ "Deshin Shekpa's miracles" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 27 ], "end": [ 50 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 4 ], "end": [ 7 ] } ] }
[ "Deshin Shekpa's miracles" ]
SQuAD
With the example of the Ming court's relationship with the fifth Karmapa and other Tibetan leaders, Norbu states that Chinese Communist historians have failed to realize the significance of the religious aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship. He writes that the meetings of lamas with the Emperor of China were exchanges of tribute between "the patron and the priest" and were not merely instances of a political subordinate paying tribute to a superior. He also notes that the items of tribute were Buddhist artifacts which symbolized "the religious nature of the relationship." Josef Kolmaš writes that the Ming dynasty did not exercise any direct political control over Tibet, content with their tribute relations that were "almost entirely of a religious character." Patricia Ann Berger writes that the Yongle Emperor's courting and granting of titles to lamas was his attempt to "resurrect the relationship between China and Tibet established earlier by the Yuan dynastic founder Khubilai Khan and his guru Phagpa." She also writes that the later Qing emperors and their Mongol associates viewed the Yongle Emperor's relationship with Tibet as "part of a chain of reincarnation that saw this Han Chinese emperor as yet another emanation of Manjusri."
{ "tokens": [ "With", "the", "example", "of", "the", "Ming", "court", "'s", "relationship", "with", "the", "fifth", "Karmapa", "and", "other", "Tibetan", "leaders", ",", "Norbu", "states", "that", "Chinese", "Communist", "historians", "have", "failed", "to", "realize", "the", "significance", "of", "the", "religious", "aspect", "of", "the", "Ming", "-", "Tibetan", "relationship", ".", "He", "writes", "that", "the", "meetings", "of", "lamas", "with", "the", "Emperor", "of", "China", "were", "exchanges", "of", "tribute", "between", "\"", "the", "patron", "and", "the", "priest", "\"", "and", "were", "not", "merely", "instances", "of", "a", "political", "subordinate", "paying", "tribute", "to", "a", "superior", ".", "He", "also", "notes", "that", "the", "items", "of", "tribute", "were", "Buddhist", "artifacts", "which", "symbolized", "\"", "the", "religious", "nature", "of", "the", "relationship", ".", "\"", "Josef", "Kolmaš", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "did", "not", "exercise", "any", "direct", "political", "control", "over", "Tibet", ",", "content", "with", "their", "tribute", "relations", "that", "were", "\"", "almost", "entirely", "of", "a", "religious", "character", ".", "\"", "Patricia", "Ann", "Berger", "writes", "that", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "courting", "and", "granting", "of", "titles", "to", "lamas", "was", "his", "attempt", "to", "\"", "resurrect", "the", "relationship", "between", "China", "and", "Tibet", "established", "earlier", "by", "the", "Yuan", "dynastic", "founder", "Khubilai", "Khan", "and", "his", "guru", "Phagpa", ".", "\"", "She", "also", "writes", "that", "the", "later", "Qing", "emperors", "and", "their", "Mongol", "associates", "viewed", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "relationship", "with", "Tibet", "as", "\"", "part", "of", "a", "chain", "of", "reincarnation", "that", "saw", "this", "Han", "Chinese", "emperor", "as", "yet", "another", "emanation", "of", "Manjusri", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 17, 20, 24, 29, 34, 37, 50, 55, 59, 65, 73, 77, 83, 91, 98, 100, 106, 113, 118, 126, 136, 147, 152, 159, 162, 170, 174, 187, 190, 194, 204, 211, 214, 218, 222, 223, 231, 243, 245, 248, 255, 260, 264, 273, 276, 282, 287, 291, 299, 302, 308, 313, 323, 326, 334, 342, 343, 347, 354, 358, 362, 368, 370, 374, 379, 383, 390, 400, 403, 405, 415, 427, 434, 442, 445, 447, 455, 457, 460, 465, 471, 476, 480, 486, 489, 497, 502, 511, 521, 527, 538, 539, 543, 553, 560, 563, 567, 579, 580, 582, 588, 595, 602, 607, 611, 616, 624, 628, 632, 641, 645, 652, 662, 670, 675, 680, 682, 690, 695, 701, 709, 719, 724, 729, 730, 737, 746, 749, 751, 761, 770, 771, 773, 782, 786, 793, 800, 805, 809, 816, 823, 826, 835, 839, 848, 851, 858, 861, 867, 871, 875, 883, 886, 887, 897, 901, 914, 922, 928, 932, 938, 950, 958, 961, 965, 970, 979, 987, 996, 1001, 1005, 1009, 1014, 1020, 1021, 1023, 1027, 1032, 1039, 1044, 1048, 1054, 1059, 1068, 1072, 1078, 1085, 1096, 1103, 1107, 1114, 1121, 1124, 1137, 1142, 1148, 1151, 1152, 1157, 1160, 1162, 1168, 1171, 1185, 1190, 1194, 1199, 1203, 1211, 1219, 1222, 1226, 1234, 1244, 1247, 1255, 1256 ] }
f6941cb706f440b0acd0688b6b9e4942
According to Norbu who failed to realize the significance of the religious aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship?
{ "tokens": [ "According", "to", "Norbu", "who", "failed", "to", "realize", "the", "significance", "of", "the", "religious", "aspect", "of", "the", "Ming", "-", "Tibetan", "relationship", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 10, 13, 19, 23, 30, 33, 41, 45, 58, 61, 65, 75, 82, 85, 89, 93, 94, 102, 114 ] }
{ "text": [ "Chinese Communist historians" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 118 ], "end": [ 145 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 21 ], "end": [ 23 ] } ] }
[ "Chinese Communist historians" ]
SQuAD
With the example of the Ming court's relationship with the fifth Karmapa and other Tibetan leaders, Norbu states that Chinese Communist historians have failed to realize the significance of the religious aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship. He writes that the meetings of lamas with the Emperor of China were exchanges of tribute between "the patron and the priest" and were not merely instances of a political subordinate paying tribute to a superior. He also notes that the items of tribute were Buddhist artifacts which symbolized "the religious nature of the relationship." Josef Kolmaš writes that the Ming dynasty did not exercise any direct political control over Tibet, content with their tribute relations that were "almost entirely of a religious character." Patricia Ann Berger writes that the Yongle Emperor's courting and granting of titles to lamas was his attempt to "resurrect the relationship between China and Tibet established earlier by the Yuan dynastic founder Khubilai Khan and his guru Phagpa." She also writes that the later Qing emperors and their Mongol associates viewed the Yongle Emperor's relationship with Tibet as "part of a chain of reincarnation that saw this Han Chinese emperor as yet another emanation of Manjusri."
{ "tokens": [ "With", "the", "example", "of", "the", "Ming", "court", "'s", "relationship", "with", "the", "fifth", "Karmapa", "and", "other", "Tibetan", "leaders", ",", "Norbu", "states", "that", "Chinese", "Communist", "historians", "have", "failed", "to", "realize", "the", "significance", "of", "the", "religious", "aspect", "of", "the", "Ming", "-", "Tibetan", "relationship", ".", "He", "writes", "that", "the", "meetings", "of", "lamas", "with", "the", "Emperor", "of", "China", "were", "exchanges", "of", "tribute", "between", "\"", "the", "patron", "and", "the", "priest", "\"", "and", "were", "not", "merely", "instances", "of", "a", "political", "subordinate", "paying", "tribute", "to", "a", "superior", ".", "He", "also", "notes", "that", "the", "items", "of", "tribute", "were", "Buddhist", "artifacts", "which", "symbolized", "\"", "the", "religious", "nature", "of", "the", "relationship", ".", "\"", "Josef", "Kolmaš", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "did", "not", "exercise", "any", "direct", "political", "control", "over", "Tibet", ",", "content", "with", "their", "tribute", "relations", "that", "were", "\"", "almost", "entirely", "of", "a", "religious", "character", ".", "\"", "Patricia", "Ann", "Berger", "writes", "that", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "courting", "and", "granting", "of", "titles", "to", "lamas", "was", "his", "attempt", "to", "\"", "resurrect", "the", "relationship", "between", "China", "and", "Tibet", "established", "earlier", "by", "the", "Yuan", "dynastic", "founder", "Khubilai", "Khan", "and", "his", "guru", "Phagpa", ".", "\"", "She", "also", "writes", "that", "the", "later", "Qing", "emperors", "and", "their", "Mongol", "associates", "viewed", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "relationship", "with", "Tibet", "as", "\"", "part", "of", "a", "chain", "of", "reincarnation", "that", "saw", "this", "Han", "Chinese", "emperor", "as", "yet", "another", "emanation", "of", "Manjusri", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 17, 20, 24, 29, 34, 37, 50, 55, 59, 65, 73, 77, 83, 91, 98, 100, 106, 113, 118, 126, 136, 147, 152, 159, 162, 170, 174, 187, 190, 194, 204, 211, 214, 218, 222, 223, 231, 243, 245, 248, 255, 260, 264, 273, 276, 282, 287, 291, 299, 302, 308, 313, 323, 326, 334, 342, 343, 347, 354, 358, 362, 368, 370, 374, 379, 383, 390, 400, 403, 405, 415, 427, 434, 442, 445, 447, 455, 457, 460, 465, 471, 476, 480, 486, 489, 497, 502, 511, 521, 527, 538, 539, 543, 553, 560, 563, 567, 579, 580, 582, 588, 595, 602, 607, 611, 616, 624, 628, 632, 641, 645, 652, 662, 670, 675, 680, 682, 690, 695, 701, 709, 719, 724, 729, 730, 737, 746, 749, 751, 761, 770, 771, 773, 782, 786, 793, 800, 805, 809, 816, 823, 826, 835, 839, 848, 851, 858, 861, 867, 871, 875, 883, 886, 887, 897, 901, 914, 922, 928, 932, 938, 950, 958, 961, 965, 970, 979, 987, 996, 1001, 1005, 1009, 1014, 1020, 1021, 1023, 1027, 1032, 1039, 1044, 1048, 1054, 1059, 1068, 1072, 1078, 1085, 1096, 1103, 1107, 1114, 1121, 1124, 1137, 1142, 1148, 1151, 1152, 1157, 1160, 1162, 1168, 1171, 1185, 1190, 1194, 1199, 1203, 1211, 1219, 1222, 1226, 1234, 1244, 1247, 1255, 1256 ] }
863a8fcbb9964196836d5cce526e0f50
What were the items of tribute?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "were", "the", "items", "of", "tribute", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 10, 14, 20, 23, 30 ] }
{ "text": [ "Buddhist artifacts" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 502 ], "end": [ 519 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 89 ], "end": [ 90 ] } ] }
[ "Buddhist artifacts" ]
SQuAD
With the example of the Ming court's relationship with the fifth Karmapa and other Tibetan leaders, Norbu states that Chinese Communist historians have failed to realize the significance of the religious aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship. He writes that the meetings of lamas with the Emperor of China were exchanges of tribute between "the patron and the priest" and were not merely instances of a political subordinate paying tribute to a superior. He also notes that the items of tribute were Buddhist artifacts which symbolized "the religious nature of the relationship." Josef Kolmaš writes that the Ming dynasty did not exercise any direct political control over Tibet, content with their tribute relations that were "almost entirely of a religious character." Patricia Ann Berger writes that the Yongle Emperor's courting and granting of titles to lamas was his attempt to "resurrect the relationship between China and Tibet established earlier by the Yuan dynastic founder Khubilai Khan and his guru Phagpa." She also writes that the later Qing emperors and their Mongol associates viewed the Yongle Emperor's relationship with Tibet as "part of a chain of reincarnation that saw this Han Chinese emperor as yet another emanation of Manjusri."
{ "tokens": [ "With", "the", "example", "of", "the", "Ming", "court", "'s", "relationship", "with", "the", "fifth", "Karmapa", "and", "other", "Tibetan", "leaders", ",", "Norbu", "states", "that", "Chinese", "Communist", "historians", "have", "failed", "to", "realize", "the", "significance", "of", "the", "religious", "aspect", "of", "the", "Ming", "-", "Tibetan", "relationship", ".", "He", "writes", "that", "the", "meetings", "of", "lamas", "with", "the", "Emperor", "of", "China", "were", "exchanges", "of", "tribute", "between", "\"", "the", "patron", "and", "the", "priest", "\"", "and", "were", "not", "merely", "instances", "of", "a", "political", "subordinate", "paying", "tribute", "to", "a", "superior", ".", "He", "also", "notes", "that", "the", "items", "of", "tribute", "were", "Buddhist", "artifacts", "which", "symbolized", "\"", "the", "religious", "nature", "of", "the", "relationship", ".", "\"", "Josef", "Kolmaš", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "did", "not", "exercise", "any", "direct", "political", "control", "over", "Tibet", ",", "content", "with", "their", "tribute", "relations", "that", "were", "\"", "almost", "entirely", "of", "a", "religious", "character", ".", "\"", "Patricia", "Ann", "Berger", "writes", "that", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "courting", "and", "granting", "of", "titles", "to", "lamas", "was", "his", "attempt", "to", "\"", "resurrect", "the", "relationship", "between", "China", "and", "Tibet", "established", "earlier", "by", "the", "Yuan", "dynastic", "founder", "Khubilai", "Khan", "and", "his", "guru", "Phagpa", ".", "\"", "She", "also", "writes", "that", "the", "later", "Qing", "emperors", "and", "their", "Mongol", "associates", "viewed", "the", "Yongle", "Emperor", "'s", "relationship", "with", "Tibet", "as", "\"", "part", "of", "a", "chain", "of", "reincarnation", "that", "saw", "this", "Han", "Chinese", "emperor", "as", "yet", "another", "emanation", "of", "Manjusri", ".", "\"" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 17, 20, 24, 29, 34, 37, 50, 55, 59, 65, 73, 77, 83, 91, 98, 100, 106, 113, 118, 126, 136, 147, 152, 159, 162, 170, 174, 187, 190, 194, 204, 211, 214, 218, 222, 223, 231, 243, 245, 248, 255, 260, 264, 273, 276, 282, 287, 291, 299, 302, 308, 313, 323, 326, 334, 342, 343, 347, 354, 358, 362, 368, 370, 374, 379, 383, 390, 400, 403, 405, 415, 427, 434, 442, 445, 447, 455, 457, 460, 465, 471, 476, 480, 486, 489, 497, 502, 511, 521, 527, 538, 539, 543, 553, 560, 563, 567, 579, 580, 582, 588, 595, 602, 607, 611, 616, 624, 628, 632, 641, 645, 652, 662, 670, 675, 680, 682, 690, 695, 701, 709, 719, 724, 729, 730, 737, 746, 749, 751, 761, 770, 771, 773, 782, 786, 793, 800, 805, 809, 816, 823, 826, 835, 839, 848, 851, 858, 861, 867, 871, 875, 883, 886, 887, 897, 901, 914, 922, 928, 932, 938, 950, 958, 961, 965, 970, 979, 987, 996, 1001, 1005, 1009, 1014, 1020, 1021, 1023, 1027, 1032, 1039, 1044, 1048, 1054, 1059, 1068, 1072, 1078, 1085, 1096, 1103, 1107, 1114, 1121, 1124, 1137, 1142, 1148, 1151, 1152, 1157, 1160, 1162, 1168, 1171, 1185, 1190, 1194, 1199, 1203, 1211, 1219, 1222, 1226, 1234, 1244, 1247, 1255, 1256 ] }
8094ab4081a64feb8837b884a0f3fdf4
Who believe that the Ming dynasty did not exercise any direct political control over Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "believe", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "did", "not", "exercise", "any", "direct", "political", "control", "over", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 12, 17, 21, 26, 34, 38, 42, 51, 55, 62, 72, 80, 85, 90 ] }
{ "text": [ "Josef Kolmaš" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 582 ], "end": [ 593 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 102 ], "end": [ 103 ] } ] }
[ "Josef Kolmaš" ]
SQuAD
Nevertheless, the ethno-geographic caste hierarchy favoring the Mongols and other ethnicities were accorded higher status than the Han Chinese majority. Although Han Chinese who were recruited as advisers were often actually more influential than high officials, their status was not as well defined. Kublai also abolished the imperial examinations of China's civil service legacy, which was not reinstated until Ayurbarwada Buyantu Khan's reign (1311–1320). Rossabi writes that Kublai recognized that in order to rule China, "he had to employ Chinese advisors and officials, yet he could not rely totally on Chinese advisers because he had to maintain a delicate balancing act between ruling the sedentary civilization of China and preserving the cultural identity and values of the Mongols." And "in governing China, he was concerned with the interests of his Chinese subjects, but also with exploiting the resources of the empire for his own aggrandizement. His motivations and objectives alternated from one to the other throughout his reign," according to Rossabi. Van Praag writes in The Status of Tibet that the Tibetans and Mongols, on the other hand, upheld a dual system of rule and an interdependent relationship that legitimated the succession of Mongol khans as universal Buddhist rulers, or chakravartin. Van Praag writes that "Tibet remained a unique part of the Empire and was never fully integrated into it," citing examples such as a licensed border market that existed between China and Tibet during the Yuan.
{ "tokens": [ "Nevertheless", ",", "the", "ethno", "-", "geographic", "caste", "hierarchy", "favoring", "the", "Mongols", "and", "other", "ethnicities", "were", "accorded", "higher", "status", "than", "the", "Han", "Chinese", "majority", ".", "Although", "Han", "Chinese", "who", "were", "recruited", "as", "advisers", "were", "often", "actually", "more", "influential", "than", "high", "officials", ",", "their", "status", "was", "not", "as", "well", "defined", ".", "Kublai", "also", "abolished", "the", "imperial", "examinations", "of", "China", "'s", "civil", "service", "legacy", ",", "which", "was", "not", "reinstated", "until", "Ayurbarwada", "Buyantu", "Khan", "'s", "reign", "(", "1311–1320", ")", ".", "Rossabi", "writes", "that", "Kublai", "recognized", "that", "in", "order", "to", "rule", "China", ",", "\"", "he", "had", "to", "employ", "Chinese", "advisors", "and", "officials", ",", "yet", "he", "could", "not", "rely", "totally", "on", "Chinese", "advisers", "because", "he", "had", "to", "maintain", "a", "delicate", "balancing", "act", "between", "ruling", "the", "sedentary", "civilization", "of", "China", "and", "preserving", "the", "cultural", "identity", "and", "values", "of", "the", "Mongols", ".", "\"", "And", "\"", "in", "governing", "China", ",", "he", "was", "concerned", "with", "the", "interests", "of", "his", "Chinese", "subjects", ",", "but", "also", "with", "exploiting", "the", "resources", "of", "the", "empire", "for", "his", "own", "aggrandizement", ".", "His", "motivations", "and", "objectives", "alternated", "from", "one", "to", "the", "other", "throughout", "his", "reign", ",", "\"", "according", "to", "Rossabi", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "in", "The", "Status", "of", "Tibet", "that", "the", "Tibetans", "and", "Mongols", ",", "on", "the", "other", "hand", ",", "upheld", "a", "dual", "system", "of", "rule", "and", "an", "interdependent", "relationship", "that", "legitimated", "the", "succession", "of", "Mongol", "khans", "as", "universal", "Buddhist", "rulers", ",", "or", "chakravartin", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "\"", "Tibet", "remained", "a", "unique", "part", "of", "the", "Empire", "and", "was", "never", "fully", "integrated", "into", "it", ",", "\"", "citing", "examples", "such", "as", "a", "licensed", "border", "market", "that", "existed", "between", "China", "and", "Tibet", "during", "the", "Yuan", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 12, 14, 18, 23, 24, 35, 41, 51, 60, 64, 72, 76, 82, 94, 99, 108, 115, 122, 127, 131, 135, 143, 151, 153, 162, 166, 174, 178, 183, 193, 196, 205, 210, 216, 225, 230, 242, 247, 252, 261, 263, 269, 276, 280, 284, 287, 292, 299, 301, 308, 313, 323, 327, 336, 349, 352, 357, 360, 366, 374, 380, 382, 388, 392, 396, 407, 413, 425, 433, 437, 440, 446, 447, 456, 457, 459, 467, 474, 479, 486, 497, 502, 505, 511, 514, 519, 524, 526, 527, 530, 534, 537, 544, 552, 561, 565, 574, 576, 580, 583, 589, 593, 598, 606, 609, 617, 626, 634, 637, 641, 644, 653, 655, 664, 674, 678, 686, 693, 697, 707, 720, 723, 729, 733, 744, 748, 757, 766, 770, 777, 780, 784, 791, 792, 794, 798, 799, 802, 812, 817, 819, 822, 826, 836, 841, 845, 855, 858, 862, 870, 878, 880, 884, 889, 894, 905, 909, 919, 922, 926, 933, 937, 941, 945, 959, 961, 965, 977, 981, 992, 1003, 1008, 1012, 1015, 1019, 1025, 1036, 1040, 1045, 1046, 1048, 1058, 1061, 1068, 1070, 1074, 1080, 1087, 1090, 1094, 1101, 1104, 1110, 1115, 1119, 1128, 1132, 1139, 1141, 1144, 1148, 1154, 1158, 1160, 1167, 1169, 1174, 1181, 1184, 1189, 1193, 1196, 1211, 1224, 1229, 1241, 1245, 1256, 1259, 1266, 1272, 1275, 1285, 1294, 1300, 1302, 1305, 1317, 1319, 1323, 1329, 1336, 1341, 1342, 1348, 1357, 1359, 1366, 1371, 1374, 1378, 1385, 1389, 1393, 1399, 1405, 1416, 1421, 1423, 1424, 1426, 1433, 1442, 1447, 1450, 1452, 1461, 1468, 1475, 1480, 1488, 1496, 1502, 1506, 1512, 1519, 1523, 1527 ] }
ac642bcecfdd44109828848ef172ec75
When did Ayurbarwada Buyantu Khan reign?
{ "tokens": [ "When", "did", "Ayurbarwada", "Buyantu", "Khan", "reign", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 9, 21, 29, 34, 39 ] }
{ "text": [ "1311–1320" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 447 ], "end": [ 455 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 73 ], "end": [ 73 ] } ] }
[ "1311–1320" ]
SQuAD
Nevertheless, the ethno-geographic caste hierarchy favoring the Mongols and other ethnicities were accorded higher status than the Han Chinese majority. Although Han Chinese who were recruited as advisers were often actually more influential than high officials, their status was not as well defined. Kublai also abolished the imperial examinations of China's civil service legacy, which was not reinstated until Ayurbarwada Buyantu Khan's reign (1311–1320). Rossabi writes that Kublai recognized that in order to rule China, "he had to employ Chinese advisors and officials, yet he could not rely totally on Chinese advisers because he had to maintain a delicate balancing act between ruling the sedentary civilization of China and preserving the cultural identity and values of the Mongols." And "in governing China, he was concerned with the interests of his Chinese subjects, but also with exploiting the resources of the empire for his own aggrandizement. His motivations and objectives alternated from one to the other throughout his reign," according to Rossabi. Van Praag writes in The Status of Tibet that the Tibetans and Mongols, on the other hand, upheld a dual system of rule and an interdependent relationship that legitimated the succession of Mongol khans as universal Buddhist rulers, or chakravartin. Van Praag writes that "Tibet remained a unique part of the Empire and was never fully integrated into it," citing examples such as a licensed border market that existed between China and Tibet during the Yuan.
{ "tokens": [ "Nevertheless", ",", "the", "ethno", "-", "geographic", "caste", "hierarchy", "favoring", "the", "Mongols", "and", "other", "ethnicities", "were", "accorded", "higher", "status", "than", "the", "Han", "Chinese", "majority", ".", "Although", "Han", "Chinese", "who", "were", "recruited", "as", "advisers", "were", "often", "actually", "more", "influential", "than", "high", "officials", ",", "their", "status", "was", "not", "as", "well", "defined", ".", "Kublai", "also", "abolished", "the", "imperial", "examinations", "of", "China", "'s", "civil", "service", "legacy", ",", "which", "was", "not", "reinstated", "until", "Ayurbarwada", "Buyantu", "Khan", "'s", "reign", "(", "1311–1320", ")", ".", "Rossabi", "writes", "that", "Kublai", "recognized", "that", "in", "order", "to", "rule", "China", ",", "\"", "he", "had", "to", "employ", "Chinese", "advisors", "and", "officials", ",", "yet", "he", "could", "not", "rely", "totally", "on", "Chinese", "advisers", "because", "he", "had", "to", "maintain", "a", "delicate", "balancing", "act", "between", "ruling", "the", "sedentary", "civilization", "of", "China", "and", "preserving", "the", "cultural", "identity", "and", "values", "of", "the", "Mongols", ".", "\"", "And", "\"", "in", "governing", "China", ",", "he", "was", "concerned", "with", "the", "interests", "of", "his", "Chinese", "subjects", ",", "but", "also", "with", "exploiting", "the", "resources", "of", "the", "empire", "for", "his", "own", "aggrandizement", ".", "His", "motivations", "and", "objectives", "alternated", "from", "one", "to", "the", "other", "throughout", "his", "reign", ",", "\"", "according", "to", "Rossabi", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "in", "The", "Status", "of", "Tibet", "that", "the", "Tibetans", "and", "Mongols", ",", "on", "the", "other", "hand", ",", "upheld", "a", "dual", "system", "of", "rule", "and", "an", "interdependent", "relationship", "that", "legitimated", "the", "succession", "of", "Mongol", "khans", "as", "universal", "Buddhist", "rulers", ",", "or", "chakravartin", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "\"", "Tibet", "remained", "a", "unique", "part", "of", "the", "Empire", "and", "was", "never", "fully", "integrated", "into", "it", ",", "\"", "citing", "examples", "such", "as", "a", "licensed", "border", "market", "that", "existed", "between", "China", "and", "Tibet", "during", "the", "Yuan", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 12, 14, 18, 23, 24, 35, 41, 51, 60, 64, 72, 76, 82, 94, 99, 108, 115, 122, 127, 131, 135, 143, 151, 153, 162, 166, 174, 178, 183, 193, 196, 205, 210, 216, 225, 230, 242, 247, 252, 261, 263, 269, 276, 280, 284, 287, 292, 299, 301, 308, 313, 323, 327, 336, 349, 352, 357, 360, 366, 374, 380, 382, 388, 392, 396, 407, 413, 425, 433, 437, 440, 446, 447, 456, 457, 459, 467, 474, 479, 486, 497, 502, 505, 511, 514, 519, 524, 526, 527, 530, 534, 537, 544, 552, 561, 565, 574, 576, 580, 583, 589, 593, 598, 606, 609, 617, 626, 634, 637, 641, 644, 653, 655, 664, 674, 678, 686, 693, 697, 707, 720, 723, 729, 733, 744, 748, 757, 766, 770, 777, 780, 784, 791, 792, 794, 798, 799, 802, 812, 817, 819, 822, 826, 836, 841, 845, 855, 858, 862, 870, 878, 880, 884, 889, 894, 905, 909, 919, 922, 926, 933, 937, 941, 945, 959, 961, 965, 977, 981, 992, 1003, 1008, 1012, 1015, 1019, 1025, 1036, 1040, 1045, 1046, 1048, 1058, 1061, 1068, 1070, 1074, 1080, 1087, 1090, 1094, 1101, 1104, 1110, 1115, 1119, 1128, 1132, 1139, 1141, 1144, 1148, 1154, 1158, 1160, 1167, 1169, 1174, 1181, 1184, 1189, 1193, 1196, 1211, 1224, 1229, 1241, 1245, 1256, 1259, 1266, 1272, 1275, 1285, 1294, 1300, 1302, 1305, 1317, 1319, 1323, 1329, 1336, 1341, 1342, 1348, 1357, 1359, 1366, 1371, 1374, 1378, 1385, 1389, 1393, 1399, 1405, 1416, 1421, 1423, 1424, 1426, 1433, 1442, 1447, 1450, 1452, 1461, 1468, 1475, 1480, 1488, 1496, 1502, 1506, 1512, 1519, 1523, 1527 ] }
daca8942effe4cb18bbab4c5033ebb9d
During the Yuan what existed between China and Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "During", "the", "Yuan", "what", "existed", "between", "China", "and", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 11, 16, 21, 29, 37, 43, 47, 52 ] }
{ "text": [ "a licensed border market" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 1450 ], "end": [ 1473 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 255 ], "end": [ 258 ] } ] }
[ "a licensed border market" ]
SQuAD
Nevertheless, the ethno-geographic caste hierarchy favoring the Mongols and other ethnicities were accorded higher status than the Han Chinese majority. Although Han Chinese who were recruited as advisers were often actually more influential than high officials, their status was not as well defined. Kublai also abolished the imperial examinations of China's civil service legacy, which was not reinstated until Ayurbarwada Buyantu Khan's reign (1311–1320). Rossabi writes that Kublai recognized that in order to rule China, "he had to employ Chinese advisors and officials, yet he could not rely totally on Chinese advisers because he had to maintain a delicate balancing act between ruling the sedentary civilization of China and preserving the cultural identity and values of the Mongols." And "in governing China, he was concerned with the interests of his Chinese subjects, but also with exploiting the resources of the empire for his own aggrandizement. His motivations and objectives alternated from one to the other throughout his reign," according to Rossabi. Van Praag writes in The Status of Tibet that the Tibetans and Mongols, on the other hand, upheld a dual system of rule and an interdependent relationship that legitimated the succession of Mongol khans as universal Buddhist rulers, or chakravartin. Van Praag writes that "Tibet remained a unique part of the Empire and was never fully integrated into it," citing examples such as a licensed border market that existed between China and Tibet during the Yuan.
{ "tokens": [ "Nevertheless", ",", "the", "ethno", "-", "geographic", "caste", "hierarchy", "favoring", "the", "Mongols", "and", "other", "ethnicities", "were", "accorded", "higher", "status", "than", "the", "Han", "Chinese", "majority", ".", "Although", "Han", "Chinese", "who", "were", "recruited", "as", "advisers", "were", "often", "actually", "more", "influential", "than", "high", "officials", ",", "their", "status", "was", "not", "as", "well", "defined", ".", "Kublai", "also", "abolished", "the", "imperial", "examinations", "of", "China", "'s", "civil", "service", "legacy", ",", "which", "was", "not", "reinstated", "until", "Ayurbarwada", "Buyantu", "Khan", "'s", "reign", "(", "1311–1320", ")", ".", "Rossabi", "writes", "that", "Kublai", "recognized", "that", "in", "order", "to", "rule", "China", ",", "\"", "he", "had", "to", "employ", "Chinese", "advisors", "and", "officials", ",", "yet", "he", "could", "not", "rely", "totally", "on", "Chinese", "advisers", "because", "he", "had", "to", "maintain", "a", "delicate", "balancing", "act", "between", "ruling", "the", "sedentary", "civilization", "of", "China", "and", "preserving", "the", "cultural", "identity", "and", "values", "of", "the", "Mongols", ".", "\"", "And", "\"", "in", "governing", "China", ",", "he", "was", "concerned", "with", "the", "interests", "of", "his", "Chinese", "subjects", ",", "but", "also", "with", "exploiting", "the", "resources", "of", "the", "empire", "for", "his", "own", "aggrandizement", ".", "His", "motivations", "and", "objectives", "alternated", "from", "one", "to", "the", "other", "throughout", "his", "reign", ",", "\"", "according", "to", "Rossabi", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "in", "The", "Status", "of", "Tibet", "that", "the", "Tibetans", "and", "Mongols", ",", "on", "the", "other", "hand", ",", "upheld", "a", "dual", "system", "of", "rule", "and", "an", "interdependent", "relationship", "that", "legitimated", "the", "succession", "of", "Mongol", "khans", "as", "universal", "Buddhist", "rulers", ",", "or", "chakravartin", ".", "Van", "Praag", "writes", "that", "\"", "Tibet", "remained", "a", "unique", "part", "of", "the", "Empire", "and", "was", "never", "fully", "integrated", "into", "it", ",", "\"", "citing", "examples", "such", "as", "a", "licensed", "border", "market", "that", "existed", "between", "China", "and", "Tibet", "during", "the", "Yuan", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 12, 14, 18, 23, 24, 35, 41, 51, 60, 64, 72, 76, 82, 94, 99, 108, 115, 122, 127, 131, 135, 143, 151, 153, 162, 166, 174, 178, 183, 193, 196, 205, 210, 216, 225, 230, 242, 247, 252, 261, 263, 269, 276, 280, 284, 287, 292, 299, 301, 308, 313, 323, 327, 336, 349, 352, 357, 360, 366, 374, 380, 382, 388, 392, 396, 407, 413, 425, 433, 437, 440, 446, 447, 456, 457, 459, 467, 474, 479, 486, 497, 502, 505, 511, 514, 519, 524, 526, 527, 530, 534, 537, 544, 552, 561, 565, 574, 576, 580, 583, 589, 593, 598, 606, 609, 617, 626, 634, 637, 641, 644, 653, 655, 664, 674, 678, 686, 693, 697, 707, 720, 723, 729, 733, 744, 748, 757, 766, 770, 777, 780, 784, 791, 792, 794, 798, 799, 802, 812, 817, 819, 822, 826, 836, 841, 845, 855, 858, 862, 870, 878, 880, 884, 889, 894, 905, 909, 919, 922, 926, 933, 937, 941, 945, 959, 961, 965, 977, 981, 992, 1003, 1008, 1012, 1015, 1019, 1025, 1036, 1040, 1045, 1046, 1048, 1058, 1061, 1068, 1070, 1074, 1080, 1087, 1090, 1094, 1101, 1104, 1110, 1115, 1119, 1128, 1132, 1139, 1141, 1144, 1148, 1154, 1158, 1160, 1167, 1169, 1174, 1181, 1184, 1189, 1193, 1196, 1211, 1224, 1229, 1241, 1245, 1256, 1259, 1266, 1272, 1275, 1285, 1294, 1300, 1302, 1305, 1317, 1319, 1323, 1329, 1336, 1341, 1342, 1348, 1357, 1359, 1366, 1371, 1374, 1378, 1385, 1389, 1393, 1399, 1405, 1416, 1421, 1423, 1424, 1426, 1433, 1442, 1447, 1450, 1452, 1461, 1468, 1475, 1480, 1488, 1496, 1502, 1506, 1512, 1519, 1523, 1527 ] }
55c1841fdb044041a3d6315d1bfbc837
Who was granted higher status than the Han Chinese majority?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "was", "granted", "higher", "status", "than", "the", "Han", "Chinese", "majority", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 8, 16, 23, 30, 35, 39, 43, 51, 59 ] }
{ "text": [ "the Mongols and other ethnicities" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 60 ], "end": [ 92 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 9 ], "end": [ 13 ] } ] }
[ "the Mongols and other ethnicities" ]
SQuAD
Helmut Hoffman states that the Ming upheld the facade of rule over Tibet through periodic missions of "tribute emissaries" to the Ming court and by granting nominal titles to ruling lamas, but did not actually interfere in Tibetan governance. Melvyn C. Goldstein writes that the Ming had no real administrative authority over Tibet, as the various titles given to Tibetan leaders did not confer authority as the earlier Mongol Yuan titles had. He asserts that "by conferring titles on Tibetans already in power, the Ming emperors merely recognized political reality." Hugh Edward Richardson writes that the Ming dynasty exercised no authority over the succession of Tibetan ruling families, the Phagmodru (1354–1435), Rinpungpa (1435–1565), and Tsangpa (1565–1642).
{ "tokens": [ "Helmut", "Hoffman", "states", "that", "the", "Ming", "upheld", "the", "facade", "of", "rule", "over", "Tibet", "through", "periodic", "missions", "of", "\"", "tribute", "emissaries", "\"", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "and", "by", "granting", "nominal", "titles", "to", "ruling", "lamas", ",", "but", "did", "not", "actually", "interfere", "in", "Tibetan", "governance", ".", "Melvyn", "C.", "Goldstein", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "had", "no", "real", "administrative", "authority", "over", "Tibet", ",", "as", "the", "various", "titles", "given", "to", "Tibetan", "leaders", "did", "not", "confer", "authority", "as", "the", "earlier", "Mongol", "Yuan", "titles", "had", ".", "He", "asserts", "that", "\"", "by", "conferring", "titles", "on", "Tibetans", "already", "in", "power", ",", "the", "Ming", "emperors", "merely", "recognized", "political", "reality", ".", "\"", "Hugh", "Edward", "Richardson", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "exercised", "no", "authority", "over", "the", "succession", "of", "Tibetan", "ruling", "families", ",", "the", "Phagmodru", "(", "1354–1435", ")", ",", "Rinpungpa", "(", "1435–1565", ")", ",", "and", "Tsangpa", "(", "1565–1642", ")", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 15, 22, 27, 31, 36, 43, 47, 54, 57, 62, 67, 73, 81, 90, 99, 102, 103, 111, 121, 123, 126, 130, 135, 141, 145, 148, 157, 165, 172, 175, 182, 187, 189, 193, 197, 201, 210, 220, 223, 231, 241, 243, 250, 253, 263, 270, 275, 279, 284, 288, 291, 296, 311, 321, 326, 331, 333, 336, 340, 348, 355, 361, 364, 372, 380, 384, 388, 395, 405, 408, 412, 420, 427, 432, 439, 442, 444, 447, 455, 460, 461, 464, 475, 482, 485, 494, 502, 505, 510, 512, 516, 521, 530, 537, 548, 558, 565, 566, 568, 573, 580, 591, 598, 603, 607, 612, 620, 630, 633, 643, 648, 652, 663, 666, 674, 681, 689, 691, 695, 705, 706, 715, 716, 718, 728, 729, 738, 739, 741, 745, 753, 754, 763, 764 ] }
2deebddbf0874311aa3931951739303c
Who believed that the Ming had no real authority over Tibet?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "believed", "that", "the", "Ming", "had", "no", "real", "authority", "over", "Tibet", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 13, 18, 22, 27, 31, 34, 39, 49, 54, 59 ] }
{ "text": [ "Melvyn C. Goldstein" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 243 ], "end": [ 261 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 43 ], "end": [ 45 ] } ] }
[ "Melvyn C. Goldstein" ]
SQuAD
Helmut Hoffman states that the Ming upheld the facade of rule over Tibet through periodic missions of "tribute emissaries" to the Ming court and by granting nominal titles to ruling lamas, but did not actually interfere in Tibetan governance. Melvyn C. Goldstein writes that the Ming had no real administrative authority over Tibet, as the various titles given to Tibetan leaders did not confer authority as the earlier Mongol Yuan titles had. He asserts that "by conferring titles on Tibetans already in power, the Ming emperors merely recognized political reality." Hugh Edward Richardson writes that the Ming dynasty exercised no authority over the succession of Tibetan ruling families, the Phagmodru (1354–1435), Rinpungpa (1435–1565), and Tsangpa (1565–1642).
{ "tokens": [ "Helmut", "Hoffman", "states", "that", "the", "Ming", "upheld", "the", "facade", "of", "rule", "over", "Tibet", "through", "periodic", "missions", "of", "\"", "tribute", "emissaries", "\"", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "and", "by", "granting", "nominal", "titles", "to", "ruling", "lamas", ",", "but", "did", "not", "actually", "interfere", "in", "Tibetan", "governance", ".", "Melvyn", "C.", "Goldstein", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "had", "no", "real", "administrative", "authority", "over", "Tibet", ",", "as", "the", "various", "titles", "given", "to", "Tibetan", "leaders", "did", "not", "confer", "authority", "as", "the", "earlier", "Mongol", "Yuan", "titles", "had", ".", "He", "asserts", "that", "\"", "by", "conferring", "titles", "on", "Tibetans", "already", "in", "power", ",", "the", "Ming", "emperors", "merely", "recognized", "political", "reality", ".", "\"", "Hugh", "Edward", "Richardson", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "exercised", "no", "authority", "over", "the", "succession", "of", "Tibetan", "ruling", "families", ",", "the", "Phagmodru", "(", "1354–1435", ")", ",", "Rinpungpa", "(", "1435–1565", ")", ",", "and", "Tsangpa", "(", "1565–1642", ")", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 15, 22, 27, 31, 36, 43, 47, 54, 57, 62, 67, 73, 81, 90, 99, 102, 103, 111, 121, 123, 126, 130, 135, 141, 145, 148, 157, 165, 172, 175, 182, 187, 189, 193, 197, 201, 210, 220, 223, 231, 241, 243, 250, 253, 263, 270, 275, 279, 284, 288, 291, 296, 311, 321, 326, 331, 333, 336, 340, 348, 355, 361, 364, 372, 380, 384, 388, 395, 405, 408, 412, 420, 427, 432, 439, 442, 444, 447, 455, 460, 461, 464, 475, 482, 485, 494, 502, 505, 510, 512, 516, 521, 530, 537, 548, 558, 565, 566, 568, 573, 580, 591, 598, 603, 607, 612, 620, 630, 633, 643, 648, 652, 663, 666, 674, 681, 689, 691, 695, 705, 706, 715, 716, 718, 728, 729, 738, 739, 741, 745, 753, 754, 763, 764 ] }
89c8395f23694dc297d14f26fafe01d9
What years did the Rinpungpa regime start and end?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "years", "did", "the", "Rinpungpa", "regime", "start", "and", "end", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 11, 15, 19, 29, 36, 42, 46, 49 ] }
{ "text": [ "1435–1565" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 729 ], "end": [ 737 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 127 ], "end": [ 127 ] } ] }
[ "1435–1565" ]
SQuAD
Helmut Hoffman states that the Ming upheld the facade of rule over Tibet through periodic missions of "tribute emissaries" to the Ming court and by granting nominal titles to ruling lamas, but did not actually interfere in Tibetan governance. Melvyn C. Goldstein writes that the Ming had no real administrative authority over Tibet, as the various titles given to Tibetan leaders did not confer authority as the earlier Mongol Yuan titles had. He asserts that "by conferring titles on Tibetans already in power, the Ming emperors merely recognized political reality." Hugh Edward Richardson writes that the Ming dynasty exercised no authority over the succession of Tibetan ruling families, the Phagmodru (1354–1435), Rinpungpa (1435–1565), and Tsangpa (1565–1642).
{ "tokens": [ "Helmut", "Hoffman", "states", "that", "the", "Ming", "upheld", "the", "facade", "of", "rule", "over", "Tibet", "through", "periodic", "missions", "of", "\"", "tribute", "emissaries", "\"", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "and", "by", "granting", "nominal", "titles", "to", "ruling", "lamas", ",", "but", "did", "not", "actually", "interfere", "in", "Tibetan", "governance", ".", "Melvyn", "C.", "Goldstein", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "had", "no", "real", "administrative", "authority", "over", "Tibet", ",", "as", "the", "various", "titles", "given", "to", "Tibetan", "leaders", "did", "not", "confer", "authority", "as", "the", "earlier", "Mongol", "Yuan", "titles", "had", ".", "He", "asserts", "that", "\"", "by", "conferring", "titles", "on", "Tibetans", "already", "in", "power", ",", "the", "Ming", "emperors", "merely", "recognized", "political", "reality", ".", "\"", "Hugh", "Edward", "Richardson", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "exercised", "no", "authority", "over", "the", "succession", "of", "Tibetan", "ruling", "families", ",", "the", "Phagmodru", "(", "1354–1435", ")", ",", "Rinpungpa", "(", "1435–1565", ")", ",", "and", "Tsangpa", "(", "1565–1642", ")", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 15, 22, 27, 31, 36, 43, 47, 54, 57, 62, 67, 73, 81, 90, 99, 102, 103, 111, 121, 123, 126, 130, 135, 141, 145, 148, 157, 165, 172, 175, 182, 187, 189, 193, 197, 201, 210, 220, 223, 231, 241, 243, 250, 253, 263, 270, 275, 279, 284, 288, 291, 296, 311, 321, 326, 331, 333, 336, 340, 348, 355, 361, 364, 372, 380, 384, 388, 395, 405, 408, 412, 420, 427, 432, 439, 442, 444, 447, 455, 460, 461, 464, 475, 482, 485, 494, 502, 505, 510, 512, 516, 521, 530, 537, 548, 558, 565, 566, 568, 573, 580, 591, 598, 603, 607, 612, 620, 630, 633, 643, 648, 652, 663, 666, 674, 681, 689, 691, 695, 705, 706, 715, 716, 718, 728, 729, 738, 739, 741, 745, 753, 754, 763, 764 ] }
971c56dfe71546e9bd0909c0b326fe86
Who believed that the titles given to Tibetan leaders did not confer authority?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "believed", "that", "the", "titles", "given", "to", "Tibetan", "leaders", "did", "not", "confer", "authority", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 13, 18, 22, 29, 35, 38, 46, 54, 58, 62, 69, 78 ] }
{ "text": [ "Melvyn C. Goldstein" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 243 ], "end": [ 261 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 43 ], "end": [ 45 ] } ] }
[ "Melvyn C. Goldstein" ]
SQuAD
Helmut Hoffman states that the Ming upheld the facade of rule over Tibet through periodic missions of "tribute emissaries" to the Ming court and by granting nominal titles to ruling lamas, but did not actually interfere in Tibetan governance. Melvyn C. Goldstein writes that the Ming had no real administrative authority over Tibet, as the various titles given to Tibetan leaders did not confer authority as the earlier Mongol Yuan titles had. He asserts that "by conferring titles on Tibetans already in power, the Ming emperors merely recognized political reality." Hugh Edward Richardson writes that the Ming dynasty exercised no authority over the succession of Tibetan ruling families, the Phagmodru (1354–1435), Rinpungpa (1435–1565), and Tsangpa (1565–1642).
{ "tokens": [ "Helmut", "Hoffman", "states", "that", "the", "Ming", "upheld", "the", "facade", "of", "rule", "over", "Tibet", "through", "periodic", "missions", "of", "\"", "tribute", "emissaries", "\"", "to", "the", "Ming", "court", "and", "by", "granting", "nominal", "titles", "to", "ruling", "lamas", ",", "but", "did", "not", "actually", "interfere", "in", "Tibetan", "governance", ".", "Melvyn", "C.", "Goldstein", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "had", "no", "real", "administrative", "authority", "over", "Tibet", ",", "as", "the", "various", "titles", "given", "to", "Tibetan", "leaders", "did", "not", "confer", "authority", "as", "the", "earlier", "Mongol", "Yuan", "titles", "had", ".", "He", "asserts", "that", "\"", "by", "conferring", "titles", "on", "Tibetans", "already", "in", "power", ",", "the", "Ming", "emperors", "merely", "recognized", "political", "reality", ".", "\"", "Hugh", "Edward", "Richardson", "writes", "that", "the", "Ming", "dynasty", "exercised", "no", "authority", "over", "the", "succession", "of", "Tibetan", "ruling", "families", ",", "the", "Phagmodru", "(", "1354–1435", ")", ",", "Rinpungpa", "(", "1435–1565", ")", ",", "and", "Tsangpa", "(", "1565–1642", ")", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 15, 22, 27, 31, 36, 43, 47, 54, 57, 62, 67, 73, 81, 90, 99, 102, 103, 111, 121, 123, 126, 130, 135, 141, 145, 148, 157, 165, 172, 175, 182, 187, 189, 193, 197, 201, 210, 220, 223, 231, 241, 243, 250, 253, 263, 270, 275, 279, 284, 288, 291, 296, 311, 321, 326, 331, 333, 336, 340, 348, 355, 361, 364, 372, 380, 384, 388, 395, 405, 408, 412, 420, 427, 432, 439, 442, 444, 447, 455, 460, 461, 464, 475, 482, 485, 494, 502, 505, 510, 512, 516, 521, 530, 537, 548, 558, 565, 566, 568, 573, 580, 591, 598, 603, 607, 612, 620, 630, 633, 643, 648, 652, 663, 666, 674, 681, 689, 691, 695, 705, 706, 715, 716, 718, 728, 729, 738, 739, 741, 745, 753, 754, 763, 764 ] }
77cb9f7dbfbe4cb8ab87d12e62706743
What years did the Tsangpa start and end?
{ "tokens": [ "What", "years", "did", "the", "Tsangpa", "start", "and", "end", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 5, 11, 15, 19, 27, 33, 37, 40 ] }
{ "text": [ "1565–1642" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 754 ], "end": [ 762 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 133 ], "end": [ 133 ] } ] }
[ "1565–1642" ]
SQuAD
However, Lok-Ham Chan, a professor of history at the University of Washington, writes that Changchub Gyaltsen's aims were to recreate the old Tibetan Kingdom that existed during the Chinese Tang dynasty, to build "nationalist sentiment" amongst Tibetans, and to "remove all traces of Mongol suzerainty." Georges Dreyfus, a professor of religion at Williams College, writes that it was Changchub Gyaltsen who adopted the old administrative system of Songtsän Gampo (c. 605–649)—the first leader of the Tibetan Empire to establish Tibet as a strong power—by reinstating its legal code of punishments and administrative units. For example, instead of the 13 governorships established by the Mongol Sakya viceroy, Changchub Gyaltsen divided Central Tibet into districts (dzong) with district heads (dzong dpon) who had to conform to old rituals and wear clothing styles of old Imperial Tibet. Van Praag asserts that Changchub Gyaltsen's ambitions were to "restore to Tibet the glories of its Imperial Age" by reinstating secular administration, promoting "national culture and traditions," and installing a law code that survived into the 20th century.
{ "tokens": [ "However", ",", "Lok", "-", "Ham", "Chan", ",", "a", "professor", "of", "history", "at", "the", "University", "of", "Washington", ",", "writes", "that", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "'s", "aims", "were", "to", "recreate", "the", "old", "Tibetan", "Kingdom", "that", "existed", "during", "the", "Chinese", "Tang", "dynasty", ",", "to", "build", "\"", "nationalist", "sentiment", "\"", "amongst", "Tibetans", ",", "and", "to", "\"", "remove", "all", "traces", "of", "Mongol", "suzerainty", ".", "\"", "Georges", "Dreyfus", ",", "a", "professor", "of", "religion", "at", "Williams", "College", ",", "writes", "that", "it", "was", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "who", "adopted", "the", "old", "administrative", "system", "of", "Songtsän", "Gampo", "(", "c.", "605–649)—the", "first", "leader", "of", "the", "Tibetan", "Empire", "to", "establish", "Tibet", "as", "a", "strong", "power", "—", "by", "reinstating", "its", "legal", "code", "of", "punishments", "and", "administrative", "units", ".", "For", "example", ",", "instead", "of", "the", "13", "governorships", "established", "by", "the", "Mongol", "Sakya", "viceroy", ",", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "divided", "Central", "Tibet", "into", "districts", "(", "dzong", ")", "with", "district", "heads", "(", "dzong", "dpon", ")", "who", "had", "to", "conform", "to", "old", "rituals", "and", "wear", "clothing", "styles", "of", "old", "Imperial", "Tibet", ".", "Van", "Praag", "asserts", "that", "Changchub", "Gyaltsen", "'s", "ambitions", "were", "to", "\"", "restore", "to", "Tibet", "the", "glories", "of", "its", "Imperial", "Age", "\"", "by", "reinstating", "secular", "administration", ",", "promoting", "\"", "national", "culture", "and", "traditions", ",", "\"", "and", "installing", "a", "law", "code", "that", "survived", "into", "the", "20th", "century", "." ], "offsets": [ 0, 7, 9, 12, 13, 17, 21, 23, 25, 35, 38, 46, 49, 53, 64, 67, 77, 79, 86, 91, 101, 109, 112, 117, 122, 125, 134, 138, 142, 150, 158, 163, 171, 178, 182, 190, 195, 202, 204, 207, 213, 214, 226, 235, 237, 245, 253, 255, 259, 262, 263, 270, 274, 281, 284, 291, 301, 302, 304, 312, 319, 321, 323, 333, 336, 345, 348, 357, 364, 366, 373, 378, 381, 385, 395, 404, 408, 416, 420, 424, 439, 446, 449, 458, 464, 465, 468, 481, 487, 494, 497, 501, 509, 516, 519, 529, 535, 538, 540, 547, 552, 553, 556, 568, 572, 578, 583, 586, 598, 602, 617, 622, 624, 628, 635, 637, 645, 648, 652, 655, 669, 681, 684, 688, 695, 701, 708, 710, 720, 729, 737, 745, 751, 756, 766, 767, 772, 774, 779, 788, 794, 795, 801, 805, 807, 811, 815, 818, 826, 829, 833, 841, 845, 850, 859, 866, 869, 873, 882, 887, 889, 893, 899, 907, 912, 922, 930, 933, 943, 948, 951, 952, 960, 963, 969, 973, 981, 984, 988, 997, 1000, 1002, 1005, 1017, 1025, 1039, 1041, 1051, 1052, 1061, 1069, 1073, 1083, 1084, 1086, 1090, 1101, 1103, 1107, 1112, 1117, 1126, 1131, 1135, 1140, 1147 ] }
b7123997f0e542279a08fb30087d4c81
Who divided Central Tibet into districts?
{ "tokens": [ "Who", "divided", "Central", "Tibet", "into", "districts", "?" ], "offsets": [ 0, 4, 12, 20, 26, 31, 40 ] }
{ "text": [ "Changchub Gyaltsen" ], "char_spans": [ { "start": [ 91 ], "end": [ 108 ] } ], "token_spans": [ { "start": [ 19 ], "end": [ 20 ] } ] }
[ "Changchub Gyaltsen" ]