Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset1

like 0

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia" ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"" ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )" ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?" ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships.", ">\n\nProbably can’t find a decent set of tweezers anywhere in Russia now." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships.", ">\n\nProbably can’t find a decent set of tweezers anywhere in Russia now.", ">\n\nWell mister Putin, you gotta ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky?" ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships.", ">\n\nProbably can’t find a decent set of tweezers anywhere in Russia now.", ">\n\nWell mister Putin, you gotta ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky?", ">\n\nMother Nature deploys new Turbo Hypercancer Brain Tumors to Putin." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships.", ">\n\nProbably can’t find a decent set of tweezers anywhere in Russia now.", ">\n\nWell mister Putin, you gotta ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky?", ">\n\nMother Nature deploys new Turbo Hypercancer Brain Tumors to Putin.", ">\n\nRemember, that ship can only go 25-30 miles/hr, so it’s going to be sunk before that speedy missile reaches London /s" ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships.", ">\n\nProbably can’t find a decent set of tweezers anywhere in Russia now.", ">\n\nWell mister Putin, you gotta ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky?", ">\n\nMother Nature deploys new Turbo Hypercancer Brain Tumors to Putin.", ">\n\nRemember, that ship can only go 25-30 miles/hr, so it’s going to be sunk before that speedy missile reaches London /s", ">\n\nI'm sure they work as advertised........." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships.", ">\n\nProbably can’t find a decent set of tweezers anywhere in Russia now.", ">\n\nWell mister Putin, you gotta ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky?", ">\n\nMother Nature deploys new Turbo Hypercancer Brain Tumors to Putin.", ">\n\nRemember, that ship can only go 25-30 miles/hr, so it’s going to be sunk before that speedy missile reaches London /s", ">\n\nI'm sure they work as advertised.........", ">\n\nI hope they remembered the tug boats." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships.", ">\n\nProbably can’t find a decent set of tweezers anywhere in Russia now.", ">\n\nWell mister Putin, you gotta ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky?", ">\n\nMother Nature deploys new Turbo Hypercancer Brain Tumors to Putin.", ">\n\nRemember, that ship can only go 25-30 miles/hr, so it’s going to be sunk before that speedy missile reaches London /s", ">\n\nI'm sure they work as advertised.........", ">\n\nI hope they remembered the tug boats.", ">\n\nthis changes nothing. why am I even reading this bs?" ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships.", ">\n\nProbably can’t find a decent set of tweezers anywhere in Russia now.", ">\n\nWell mister Putin, you gotta ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky?", ">\n\nMother Nature deploys new Turbo Hypercancer Brain Tumors to Putin.", ">\n\nRemember, that ship can only go 25-30 miles/hr, so it’s going to be sunk before that speedy missile reaches London /s", ">\n\nI'm sure they work as advertised.........", ">\n\nI hope they remembered the tug boats.", ">\n\nthis changes nothing. why am I even reading this bs?", ">\n\nThe desperation is pathetic." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships.", ">\n\nProbably can’t find a decent set of tweezers anywhere in Russia now.", ">\n\nWell mister Putin, you gotta ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky?", ">\n\nMother Nature deploys new Turbo Hypercancer Brain Tumors to Putin.", ">\n\nRemember, that ship can only go 25-30 miles/hr, so it’s going to be sunk before that speedy missile reaches London /s", ">\n\nI'm sure they work as advertised.........", ">\n\nI hope they remembered the tug boats.", ">\n\nthis changes nothing. why am I even reading this bs?", ">\n\nThe desperation is pathetic.", ">\n\nRight now Russia is like the kid who can throw rocks but sucks in a fist fight." ]

[ "okie doke thanks for the heads-up.", ">\n\nI'm surprised he has any left considering the number he has been throwing at women and children in Ukraine for half a year.", ">\n\nNo hypersonic modern weapons have been sent on Ukraine. The best they sent was kalibr and some other shits. They resume and relocate missile factory farther in east Russia. This is why they said they will never be short in missiles.\nHypersonic tech might as well be used only for sol air high priority targets (B2 and other high speed or high altitude bombers/interceptors) OR naval conflict. No way they throw this tech on land, too sensitive tech.", ">\n\nHypersonic don’t target airborn threats, they are air to ground. And they have used one in Ukraine at least if you trust their statement on it..\nLastly B2 really? It’s speed isn’t the problem- It’s low radar cross section is. That’s not something hypersonics even addresses", ">\n\nB2 ofc (and lancer) because of the B2’s eventual wingman’s. The missile should be faster than the air/air missile carried by eventual gardian angels. But the primary use of those weapons are at sea or eventual very high priority land targets.", ">\n\nHmm.. Sounds like this cruise missile has two scary words I don't fully understand...", ">\n\nPutin also ordered that the next generation of missiles be powered by Mr Fusion after watching an episode of Back to the Future.", ">\n\nHypersonic missiles are no big deal, and there is no such thing as a \"hypersonic cruise missile\" total b/s", ">\n\nUnder valued reply. Don't forget they're nearly 100 times as expensive as cruise missiles.", ">\n\nWhich is why the fear mongering around China and Russia having more advanced hypersonic tech is a joke.", ">\n\nPutin has to know that Russia can never win in a conventional military contest with the West and can only end the game entirely, right? \nIt's only advantage is in tactical nukes. Sure, they could start using them in a war but NATO would retaliate with what it has and yada yada yada game over.", ">\n\nPutin is banking on the economic strain that this war is causing to the West will lead to either public backlash that causes western nations to stop supporting Ukraine. Or, the economic strain leads to a big enough world recession that it destroys the economies of Russia's rivals.\nHe's also causing many countries to throw money at Ukraine, which will lead to more inflation.", ">\n\nDidn't the last few of these fall on their own occupied areas?", ">\n\nThat was before they received new supplies of rubber bands from North Korea.", ">\n\nNothing but the FINEST rubber bands you've ever seen!", ">\n\nUnfortunately, the instructions on how to use them, was a photocopy, of a photocopy, of a photocopy, were in Korean only and was missing the allen key. /s", ">\n\n10 bucks they're made out of wood and silly putty and they only have like 10 of em", ">\n\nProbably not even pointy", ">\n\nNow I am certain you were watching a cartoon…", ">\n\nCouldn't afford the Diamond hypersonic", ">\n\nZircon encrusted tweezers!", ">\n\nSpoken like a true Dental Floss Tycoon.", ">\n\nLol I think I prefer our nukes being in submarines hidden around the world rather than sitting on a fairly weak surface vessel that everyone can see.", ">\n\ngive me one ping", ">\n\nSuch a good movie. I think it leaves Netflix this month, time to get another watch in. \nLet them sing.", ">\n\nAppear strong when you are weak. He fucked.", ">\n\nGo ahead Russia, make our day. We aren't crows. Scarecrow's won't detour us.", ">\n\nDesperate Putin can suck it", ">\n\nIs this another Wunderwaffe that will totally most definitely make the difference this time? It's worked out so well for them previously", ">\n\nPff hypersonic missle bullshit is a joke. Launching your missle from. A jet doesn't count. Fuck off ruzzia", ">\n\nIn tomorrow's news: \"Cruiser carrying Zircon hypersonic missile, moving to port absolutely under it's own power, and totally not on fire\"", ">\n\nCorrection: Putin deploys piece of shit Zircrap hypersuck “missiles” to Atlantic ( if the boat can even get there with out breaking down )", ">\n\nOn a frigate which is one of the smallest warship. Come to think of it Russia hardly have any modern heavy warship. All of their heavy weight warships are of Soviet era design and getting rather long on the tooth.", ">\n\nTheir flagship (which is in drydock for the next 2 years) had its own tugboat, that followed it around the world.", ">\n\nIf he really had threatening firepower, why wouldn't he use it on Ukraine ?", ">\n\nHypersonic weapons don't need to be used often. The advantage of them is they are impossible to defend with anti missile defenses, which Ukraine doesn't have much of. This is basically Putin saying the west can arm Ukraine with anti missile technology, but it won't save them.", ">\n\nThis is a bluff. If he had a weapon that was more effective he would use it. He is first and foremost a propagandist who knows how to manipulate western media and the public opinion it influences.", ">\n\nThey aren't more effective against a nation that can't defend against normal missiles. Hypersonic missiles don't cause more damage, they just bypass missile defenses, which Ukraine currently lacks anyways.\nI've actually worked on hypersonic weapons in the US. You clearly don't understand what they actually are.", ">\n\nAn arms race beyond the already existing Mutually Assured Destruction? What are they going to do, build faster nukes on both sides? \nSure, but the end results are they same, the capability already exists to get where that is already heading towards.", ">\n\nThis. Sending those missiles to the Atlantic is a waste of time and money. We already have intercontinental weapons capable of killing everyone instantly.\nRussia is just trying to look scary, but that won't change the fact that if even a single missile hits NATO territory their destruction is assured. No one is actually scared of this.", ">\n\nThis is 100% posturing to show their own people \"how strong they are\".\nMother fuckers don't understand that there's 100% a US sub tailing this thing and will sink it the second it shows hostility to and nato country.\nBetter fire all those missiles at once cause that'll be the only chance Russia has to use em.", ">\n\nJust as long as they understand how silent they are and that they will never hear our stuff unless we want them to.", ">\n\nRussian, submarine, silent. Pick two.", ">\n\nThe cruise missile are a new danger level with nuclear warheads only.", ">\n\nRussia is desperate. They were considered a world power and weren't. If Putin cares at all for his people, he will stop this war and try to repair the damage he has done.", ">\n\nI hope it has a few support ships.", ">\n\nProbably can’t find a decent set of tweezers anywhere in Russia now.", ">\n\nWell mister Putin, you gotta ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky?", ">\n\nMother Nature deploys new Turbo Hypercancer Brain Tumors to Putin.", ">\n\nRemember, that ship can only go 25-30 miles/hr, so it’s going to be sunk before that speedy missile reaches London /s", ">\n\nI'm sure they work as advertised.........", ">\n\nI hope they remembered the tug boats.", ">\n\nthis changes nothing. why am I even reading this bs?", ">\n\nThe desperation is pathetic.", ">\n\nRight now Russia is like the kid who can throw rocks but sucks in a fist fight.", ">\n\nThey are. That's why they're employing scare tactics to try and regain some of that intimidation they lost when they got their ass kicked by a country and army a fraction of their size.\nIf they were capable of winning, then they wouldn't need intimidation, they'd just win already." ]

[]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine.", ">\n\ninstead of sending material to Ukraine, we should send troops there. NATO could have ended the bloodshed a year ago." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine.", ">\n\ninstead of sending material to Ukraine, we should send troops there. NATO could have ended the bloodshed a year ago.", ">\n\nThis might make Putin panic and launch nukes." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine.", ">\n\ninstead of sending material to Ukraine, we should send troops there. NATO could have ended the bloodshed a year ago.", ">\n\nThis might make Putin panic and launch nukes.", ">\n\nAbout time France has a big army and I think they have been a bit stingy." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine.", ">\n\ninstead of sending material to Ukraine, we should send troops there. NATO could have ended the bloodshed a year ago.", ">\n\nThis might make Putin panic and launch nukes.", ">\n\nAbout time France has a big army and I think they have been a bit stingy.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nDuring a New Year's Eve speech published on her social media account, Lambrecht reflected on \"War raging in the middle of Europe,\" a reference to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.\nThe IOW notes that Russian forces have suffered significant losses of artillery systems and armored vehicles in operations in Ukraine since the start of partial mobilization in September.\nThe IOW commented on a Ukrainian report that Russian forces in eastern Ukraine are currently firing artillery shells at roughly one-third the rate of the summer of 2022.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Russian^#1 Ukraine^#2 Skip^#3 Ukrainian^#4 artillery^#5" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine.", ">\n\ninstead of sending material to Ukraine, we should send troops there. NATO could have ended the bloodshed a year ago.", ">\n\nThis might make Putin panic and launch nukes.", ">\n\nAbout time France has a big army and I think they have been a bit stingy.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nDuring a New Year's Eve speech published on her social media account, Lambrecht reflected on \"War raging in the middle of Europe,\" a reference to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.\nThe IOW notes that Russian forces have suffered significant losses of artillery systems and armored vehicles in operations in Ukraine since the start of partial mobilization in September.\nThe IOW commented on a Ukrainian report that Russian forces in eastern Ukraine are currently firing artillery shells at roughly one-third the rate of the summer of 2022.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Russian^#1 Ukraine^#2 Skip^#3 Ukrainian^#4 artillery^#5", ">\n\nI think I'd rather have dark tanks since they're harder to spot" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine.", ">\n\ninstead of sending material to Ukraine, we should send troops there. NATO could have ended the bloodshed a year ago.", ">\n\nThis might make Putin panic and launch nukes.", ">\n\nAbout time France has a big army and I think they have been a bit stingy.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nDuring a New Year's Eve speech published on her social media account, Lambrecht reflected on \"War raging in the middle of Europe,\" a reference to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.\nThe IOW notes that Russian forces have suffered significant losses of artillery systems and armored vehicles in operations in Ukraine since the start of partial mobilization in September.\nThe IOW commented on a Ukrainian report that Russian forces in eastern Ukraine are currently firing artillery shells at roughly one-third the rate of the summer of 2022.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Russian^#1 Ukraine^#2 Skip^#3 Ukrainian^#4 artillery^#5", ">\n\nI think I'd rather have dark tanks since they're harder to spot", ">\n\nNot in the snow" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine.", ">\n\ninstead of sending material to Ukraine, we should send troops there. NATO could have ended the bloodshed a year ago.", ">\n\nThis might make Putin panic and launch nukes.", ">\n\nAbout time France has a big army and I think they have been a bit stingy.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nDuring a New Year's Eve speech published on her social media account, Lambrecht reflected on \"War raging in the middle of Europe,\" a reference to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.\nThe IOW notes that Russian forces have suffered significant losses of artillery systems and armored vehicles in operations in Ukraine since the start of partial mobilization in September.\nThe IOW commented on a Ukrainian report that Russian forces in eastern Ukraine are currently firing artillery shells at roughly one-third the rate of the summer of 2022.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Russian^#1 Ukraine^#2 Skip^#3 Ukrainian^#4 artillery^#5", ">\n\nI think I'd rather have dark tanks since they're harder to spot", ">\n\nNot in the snow", ">\n\nHow many?" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine.", ">\n\ninstead of sending material to Ukraine, we should send troops there. NATO could have ended the bloodshed a year ago.", ">\n\nThis might make Putin panic and launch nukes.", ">\n\nAbout time France has a big army and I think they have been a bit stingy.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nDuring a New Year's Eve speech published on her social media account, Lambrecht reflected on \"War raging in the middle of Europe,\" a reference to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.\nThe IOW notes that Russian forces have suffered significant losses of artillery systems and armored vehicles in operations in Ukraine since the start of partial mobilization in September.\nThe IOW commented on a Ukrainian report that Russian forces in eastern Ukraine are currently firing artillery shells at roughly one-third the rate of the summer of 2022.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Russian^#1 Ukraine^#2 Skip^#3 Ukrainian^#4 artillery^#5", ">\n\nI think I'd rather have dark tanks since they're harder to spot", ">\n\nNot in the snow", ">\n\nHow many?", ">\n\nA 30mil autocannon pierced a t62 in the ass. 105mil can definetly destroy old tanks no problem." ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine.", ">\n\ninstead of sending material to Ukraine, we should send troops there. NATO could have ended the bloodshed a year ago.", ">\n\nThis might make Putin panic and launch nukes.", ">\n\nAbout time France has a big army and I think they have been a bit stingy.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nDuring a New Year's Eve speech published on her social media account, Lambrecht reflected on \"War raging in the middle of Europe,\" a reference to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.\nThe IOW notes that Russian forces have suffered significant losses of artillery systems and armored vehicles in operations in Ukraine since the start of partial mobilization in September.\nThe IOW commented on a Ukrainian report that Russian forces in eastern Ukraine are currently firing artillery shells at roughly one-third the rate of the summer of 2022.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Russian^#1 Ukraine^#2 Skip^#3 Ukrainian^#4 artillery^#5", ">\n\nI think I'd rather have dark tanks since they're harder to spot", ">\n\nNot in the snow", ">\n\nHow many?", ">\n\nA 30mil autocannon pierced a t62 in the ass. 105mil can definetly destroy old tanks no problem.", ">\n\nEveryone is contributing to Ukraine, why doesn't the world just go to war on Russia?" ]

[ "Infantry support vehicle with a big ass gun can't hurt. It can't take on tanks directly but it can still help.", ">\n\nIt can definitely take on tanks directly.\nRussia is sending in t55s lol", ">\n\nIt's limitation is it's 105mm gun. It cannot engage a modernish MBT from the front, unless at close range, I understand. Flanking and older MBTs? Those situations it can handle.", ">\n\nT-55 or T-62 are not modern MBTs. They also use 105mm guns, albeit now on average 40~50 years old with no stabilizers.", ">\n\nYeah, Russia is sending in MBTs that it can deal with. It should also be able 5o take out APCs and IFVs with no issue. Russia still has t72s around which it needs to be smart with though. \nIt's a useful vehicle, no doubt. Just explaining It's limitations :)", ">\n\n\n\"This is the first time that Western-made armoured vehicles are being delivered in support of the Ukrainian army,\" a French official said.\n\nI was not aware of that.\n\nThe official did not provide any further details about the amount of vehicles to be sent or when they would be delivered.\nAMX-10 is an armored reconnaissance vehicle with a high level of mobility, with a carrying capacity of four crew.", ">\n\nWestern made armored vehicles were supplied but they were all MRAPs. Nothing capable/intended to fight directly was supplied until now. I hope this will at least open the door for IFVs. IFVs and tanks would be even better.", ">\n\nThat's not true though... Netherlands for example donated almost their entire stockpile of AIFVs with 25mm autocannons, and Australia gave some 200+ M113AS4s, which have the same armor rating as the AMX-10 and some carry 76mm main guns. \nDenmark has been trying since the war began to send Piranha IIIs armed with 35mm autocannons, but Switzerland keeps being a shithead and blocking it", ">\n\nSurprised that NATO members haven't divested from Switzerland in terms of military manufacturing yet. If they're not willing to supply ammo in this case they're definitely not going to supply ammo in a conflict that involves NATO.", ">\n\nGermany has started. One of their largest military companies (Rheinmetall?) bought an ammo production company to bring Gepard ammo production in house. This may be the beginning of the end for the Swiss arms industry in Europe.", ">\n\nThe fact it was a thing in the first place was risky and shortsighted", ">\n\nThis is good and well orchestrated. Slowly supply more and more advanced weapons. Not too much at a time, just the right amount to slowly increase the heat and cook that frog putin until he boils. I am really impressed with how well the west has handled this. Never giving russia an excuse, always making it look casual and not planned. The demise is coming and he can't even see it. Beautiful.", ">\n\nOh he sees it, everyone does", ">\n\nSure about that? Putin? The megalomanian paranoid hiding-in-my-villa covid-terrified little man that he is? Surrounded by \"yes men\". Killing anyone opposing him?\nIf so, who has the balls to tell him that he is loosing? Who has the balls to tell him that he does not have the second most powerful army in the world, and rather the second most powerful army in Ukraine? Who has the balls to tell him that his soldiers lack moral, training, command & control, logistics, equipment or even a coordinated plan? Who has the balls to tell him that most of the money he´s spent on his military has been embezzled and used on yaths and villas.\nBut if he does see it - oh man, imagine the pain, the endless pain. The feeling of pending doom.", ">\n\nTanks alot", ">\n\nAnyone know the purpose of the cage-like material attached to the exterior of the tank?", ">\n\nThe cage armor is intended to protect against infantry-carried anti-tank weapons. If it catches a round between two slats it can crush the warhead or damage the fuze, preventing it from detonating. It isn’t guaranteed protection, as the round can still detonate it if strikes a bar directly, but it increases the vehicle’s chances of survival for a comparatively minor increase in weight.", ">\n\nessentially you're right, i's protection against anti tank weapons. But it's meant to detonate shaped charges early, outside the vehicle, so they squirt their molten metal at the outside of the vehicle instead of into the crew department.", ">\n\nNo, early detonation of shaped charges is not the primary purpose of slat armor. Most slat armor is not placed far enough away from the hull of a vehicle to allow the shaped charge to dissipate properly, especially considering slat armor is most common on lightly-armored vehicles. Its primary function is to prevent shaped charges from detonating in the first place by damaging the fuze or main charge.\nThere’s a very good post on the subject pinned on r/TankPorn that goes into more detail for a better explanation.", ">\n\nGood move, the mention of light tanks + we will say to Russia, it is only light tanks will prepare them to do shit about medium and heavy in the future. It is the opening of tank season, now Germany, you need to send tanks too !", ">\n\nI wasn't very clear. I meant it can't take on tanks directly because I can't imagine it can take a hit even from the old T-55s and T-62s Russia is supposedly fielding. I suspect it's 105mm cannon and ATGMs could be very effective assuming it can't be targeted in return.", ">\n\nRussia isn't using T-55s. Russia has sent T-62Ms, which were modernized in the 80s to keep them relevant. Russia isn't likely to have any functioning T-55s. Ukraine is using T-55s, specifically the M-55S donated by Slovakia.", ">\n\nCool.", ">\n\n\nFormer Russian Deputy Minister Dmitry Rogozin, who was injured last month in eastern Ukraine, said he sent shrapnel in an envelope to French President Emmanuel Macron. He claimed that this shrapnel from a French howitzer caused his wounds\n\nAww how sweet. Melt that shrapnel down into another shell and send it back to Ukraine.", ">\n\ninstead of sending material to Ukraine, we should send troops there. NATO could have ended the bloodshed a year ago.", ">\n\nThis might make Putin panic and launch nukes.", ">\n\nAbout time France has a big army and I think they have been a bit stingy.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nDuring a New Year's Eve speech published on her social media account, Lambrecht reflected on \"War raging in the middle of Europe,\" a reference to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.\nThe IOW notes that Russian forces have suffered significant losses of artillery systems and armored vehicles in operations in Ukraine since the start of partial mobilization in September.\nThe IOW commented on a Ukrainian report that Russian forces in eastern Ukraine are currently firing artillery shells at roughly one-third the rate of the summer of 2022.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Russian^#1 Ukraine^#2 Skip^#3 Ukrainian^#4 artillery^#5", ">\n\nI think I'd rather have dark tanks since they're harder to spot", ">\n\nNot in the snow", ">\n\nHow many?", ">\n\nA 30mil autocannon pierced a t62 in the ass. 105mil can definetly destroy old tanks no problem.", ">\n\nEveryone is contributing to Ukraine, why doesn't the world just go to war on Russia?", ">\n\nRight now Ukraine is taking losses while we get all the profit. \nAnother thing to consider is the M5 program. US is set to replace all their rifles with M5s but it will take a couple more years to get set up. Might as well wait until we have our new toys equipped before heading off." ]

[]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective)." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\"." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook", ">\n\nEvery time a verified oldest person passes away, hundreds come out of the woodwork with the most disheveled old man they can find with stories like \"oh yeah my neighbor's grand uncle is definitely 150, they just didn't have papers back then\". Looks like we made it to the thread before that!!\nIt gets even more exciting when it's a world record holder because then every remote mountain in the world suddenly becomes ideal conditions to absolutely shatter longevity records for a few hours, along with the usual facebook-level wisdom about how the air from their neck of the woods has magical purity allowing this astounding record that the press doesn't want you to know about!\nSorry, I got carried away with satire here, guess I'm passionate about that trope.\nRIP Bessie ❤" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook", ">\n\nEvery time a verified oldest person passes away, hundreds come out of the woodwork with the most disheveled old man they can find with stories like \"oh yeah my neighbor's grand uncle is definitely 150, they just didn't have papers back then\". Looks like we made it to the thread before that!!\nIt gets even more exciting when it's a world record holder because then every remote mountain in the world suddenly becomes ideal conditions to absolutely shatter longevity records for a few hours, along with the usual facebook-level wisdom about how the air from their neck of the woods has magical purity allowing this astounding record that the press doesn't want you to know about!\nSorry, I got carried away with satire here, guess I'm passionate about that trope.\nRIP Bessie ❤", ">\n\nAnd now begins the search for her successor." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook", ">\n\nEvery time a verified oldest person passes away, hundreds come out of the woodwork with the most disheveled old man they can find with stories like \"oh yeah my neighbor's grand uncle is definitely 150, they just didn't have papers back then\". Looks like we made it to the thread before that!!\nIt gets even more exciting when it's a world record holder because then every remote mountain in the world suddenly becomes ideal conditions to absolutely shatter longevity records for a few hours, along with the usual facebook-level wisdom about how the air from their neck of the woods has magical purity allowing this astounding record that the press doesn't want you to know about!\nSorry, I got carried away with satire here, guess I'm passionate about that trope.\nRIP Bessie ❤", ">\n\nAnd now begins the search for her successor.", ">\n\nThere's already a running list of really old people. Edie Ceccarelli was born a couple of months after her and is now the oldest living person in the US. A couple months after her is Hazel Plummer. The oldest person in the world is in France, she'll turn 119 next month." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook", ">\n\nEvery time a verified oldest person passes away, hundreds come out of the woodwork with the most disheveled old man they can find with stories like \"oh yeah my neighbor's grand uncle is definitely 150, they just didn't have papers back then\". Looks like we made it to the thread before that!!\nIt gets even more exciting when it's a world record holder because then every remote mountain in the world suddenly becomes ideal conditions to absolutely shatter longevity records for a few hours, along with the usual facebook-level wisdom about how the air from their neck of the woods has magical purity allowing this astounding record that the press doesn't want you to know about!\nSorry, I got carried away with satire here, guess I'm passionate about that trope.\nRIP Bessie ❤", ">\n\nAnd now begins the search for her successor.", ">\n\nThere's already a running list of really old people. Edie Ceccarelli was born a couple of months after her and is now the oldest living person in the US. A couple months after her is Hazel Plummer. The oldest person in the world is in France, she'll turn 119 next month.", ">\n\n1907... she has seen some scheisse" ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook", ">\n\nEvery time a verified oldest person passes away, hundreds come out of the woodwork with the most disheveled old man they can find with stories like \"oh yeah my neighbor's grand uncle is definitely 150, they just didn't have papers back then\". Looks like we made it to the thread before that!!\nIt gets even more exciting when it's a world record holder because then every remote mountain in the world suddenly becomes ideal conditions to absolutely shatter longevity records for a few hours, along with the usual facebook-level wisdom about how the air from their neck of the woods has magical purity allowing this astounding record that the press doesn't want you to know about!\nSorry, I got carried away with satire here, guess I'm passionate about that trope.\nRIP Bessie ❤", ">\n\nAnd now begins the search for her successor.", ">\n\nThere's already a running list of really old people. Edie Ceccarelli was born a couple of months after her and is now the oldest living person in the US. A couple months after her is Hazel Plummer. The oldest person in the world is in France, she'll turn 119 next month.", ">\n\n1907... she has seen some scheisse", ">\n\nLiterally was too old for this shit. \nRest in power, Queen." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook", ">\n\nEvery time a verified oldest person passes away, hundreds come out of the woodwork with the most disheveled old man they can find with stories like \"oh yeah my neighbor's grand uncle is definitely 150, they just didn't have papers back then\". Looks like we made it to the thread before that!!\nIt gets even more exciting when it's a world record holder because then every remote mountain in the world suddenly becomes ideal conditions to absolutely shatter longevity records for a few hours, along with the usual facebook-level wisdom about how the air from their neck of the woods has magical purity allowing this astounding record that the press doesn't want you to know about!\nSorry, I got carried away with satire here, guess I'm passionate about that trope.\nRIP Bessie ❤", ">\n\nAnd now begins the search for her successor.", ">\n\nThere's already a running list of really old people. Edie Ceccarelli was born a couple of months after her and is now the oldest living person in the US. A couple months after her is Hazel Plummer. The oldest person in the world is in France, she'll turn 119 next month.", ">\n\n1907... she has seen some scheisse", ">\n\nLiterally was too old for this shit. \nRest in power, Queen.", ">\n\nA true living fossil. What an incredible life." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook", ">\n\nEvery time a verified oldest person passes away, hundreds come out of the woodwork with the most disheveled old man they can find with stories like \"oh yeah my neighbor's grand uncle is definitely 150, they just didn't have papers back then\". Looks like we made it to the thread before that!!\nIt gets even more exciting when it's a world record holder because then every remote mountain in the world suddenly becomes ideal conditions to absolutely shatter longevity records for a few hours, along with the usual facebook-level wisdom about how the air from their neck of the woods has magical purity allowing this astounding record that the press doesn't want you to know about!\nSorry, I got carried away with satire here, guess I'm passionate about that trope.\nRIP Bessie ❤", ">\n\nAnd now begins the search for her successor.", ">\n\nThere's already a running list of really old people. Edie Ceccarelli was born a couple of months after her and is now the oldest living person in the US. A couple months after her is Hazel Plummer. The oldest person in the world is in France, she'll turn 119 next month.", ">\n\n1907... she has seen some scheisse", ">\n\nLiterally was too old for this shit. \nRest in power, Queen.", ">\n\nA true living fossil. What an incredible life.", ">\n\nAlso the last person ever to be named Bessie." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook", ">\n\nEvery time a verified oldest person passes away, hundreds come out of the woodwork with the most disheveled old man they can find with stories like \"oh yeah my neighbor's grand uncle is definitely 150, they just didn't have papers back then\". Looks like we made it to the thread before that!!\nIt gets even more exciting when it's a world record holder because then every remote mountain in the world suddenly becomes ideal conditions to absolutely shatter longevity records for a few hours, along with the usual facebook-level wisdom about how the air from their neck of the woods has magical purity allowing this astounding record that the press doesn't want you to know about!\nSorry, I got carried away with satire here, guess I'm passionate about that trope.\nRIP Bessie ❤", ">\n\nAnd now begins the search for her successor.", ">\n\nThere's already a running list of really old people. Edie Ceccarelli was born a couple of months after her and is now the oldest living person in the US. A couple months after her is Hazel Plummer. The oldest person in the world is in France, she'll turn 119 next month.", ">\n\n1907... she has seen some scheisse", ">\n\nLiterally was too old for this shit. \nRest in power, Queen.", ">\n\nA true living fossil. What an incredible life.", ">\n\nAlso the last person ever to be named Bessie.", ">\n\nGoodbye, Bessie Mae - Jimi Hendrix\nThat's what comes to mind when I hear the name Bessie." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook", ">\n\nEvery time a verified oldest person passes away, hundreds come out of the woodwork with the most disheveled old man they can find with stories like \"oh yeah my neighbor's grand uncle is definitely 150, they just didn't have papers back then\". Looks like we made it to the thread before that!!\nIt gets even more exciting when it's a world record holder because then every remote mountain in the world suddenly becomes ideal conditions to absolutely shatter longevity records for a few hours, along with the usual facebook-level wisdom about how the air from their neck of the woods has magical purity allowing this astounding record that the press doesn't want you to know about!\nSorry, I got carried away with satire here, guess I'm passionate about that trope.\nRIP Bessie ❤", ">\n\nAnd now begins the search for her successor.", ">\n\nThere's already a running list of really old people. Edie Ceccarelli was born a couple of months after her and is now the oldest living person in the US. A couple months after her is Hazel Plummer. The oldest person in the world is in France, she'll turn 119 next month.", ">\n\n1907... she has seen some scheisse", ">\n\nLiterally was too old for this shit. \nRest in power, Queen.", ">\n\nA true living fossil. What an incredible life.", ">\n\nAlso the last person ever to be named Bessie.", ">\n\nGoodbye, Bessie Mae - Jimi Hendrix\nThat's what comes to mind when I hear the name Bessie.", ">\n\nAmazing a person can live to 100 plus 15 years." ]

[ "For reference, this woman was:\n- 6 years old when World War One began\n- 21 years old when the stock market crashed\n- 32 years old when WW2 began in Europe and 35 when the US entered\n- 42 years old when the Korean War began\n- 59 years old during the Summer of Love\n- 61 years old when the first moon landing occurred\n- 67 years old when Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese\n- 73 years old (by three days) when Reagan was elected president\n- 82 years old (by two days) when the Berlin Wall fell\n- 84 years old when the USSR ceased to exist\n- 93 years old on 9/11\n- 100 years old when Barack Obama was elected president \nNeedless to say, it's hard to even imagine the level of change she experienced over the course of her life.", ">\n\nWhoa. The 911 and USSR ones seem crazy to me.", ">\n\nDidn’t even mention 11ish 1919 when the USSR began, 5 years after WW1 started. So she out lasted it", ">\n\nThe USSR only lasted 70ish years, so I imagine quite a lot of the people born in the years leading up to its formation outlived it.", ">\n\nYeah my paternal great grandparents outlived it by nearly 20 years and were born a few years before it.", ">\n\n\nAt her 110th birthday party in 2017, Bessie told us that the secret to a long life was hard work\n\nI'm gonna side with the centurians who claim it's whiskey and bacon every day", ">\n\nI’m beginning to think these folks have no fucking clue how they ended up living so long", ">\n\nGenetics, good health, and a shit ton of good luck (or bad depending on your perspective).", ">\n\nYou're right and I really wonder if diet has anything to do with it. My MIL is 98 and has always eaten like a little kid ( mac and cheese, tea and toast, cookies and cakes , sips juice all day) never eats vegetables and grew up on all canned goods but she has absolutely no health problems. She can't figure out why she is alive either, besides the \" shit ton of good luck\".", ">\n\nProbably has some great quest she needs to complete before she's allowed to pass.", ">\n\nDang, I am not financially preparing for 50 years of retirement.", ">\n\nI’m female and 69 years old. I just realized I am in great health so I could have 30 more years!", ">\n\nYea but will you 69 one last time before you turn 70?", ">\n\nIt is a worthy goal.", ">\n\nDon't let your dreams be dreams", ">\n\nNow there's a new oldest person. I wonder how often this torch is passed.", ">\n\nI'm like 90% sure there are a couple people currently living that were already older.\nEdit: nevermind, overlooked the \"in US\" part", ">\n\nBessie Hendricks, died 115, shot by the police in a daring day light bank hold up.", ">\n\nI was sure she'd go out trying to jump the Grand Canyon on a motorcycle.", ">\n\nThat was her escape route alright.", ">\n\nAll of these people who are “Oldest In The ____” keep dying. Definitely not a title one wants to have…", ">\n\nIt’s almost as if there’s a correlation between age and chances of death.", ">\n\nThat's why I've decided not to age.", ">\n\nWild. She crashed her motorcycle doing a wheelie on the highway.", ">\n\n(former) oldest living squid", ">\n\nTomorrow on my Facebook feed:\n\"Let me guess, she got THE JAB, right?\"", ">\n\nYour fault for opening facebook", ">\n\nEvery time a verified oldest person passes away, hundreds come out of the woodwork with the most disheveled old man they can find with stories like \"oh yeah my neighbor's grand uncle is definitely 150, they just didn't have papers back then\". Looks like we made it to the thread before that!!\nIt gets even more exciting when it's a world record holder because then every remote mountain in the world suddenly becomes ideal conditions to absolutely shatter longevity records for a few hours, along with the usual facebook-level wisdom about how the air from their neck of the woods has magical purity allowing this astounding record that the press doesn't want you to know about!\nSorry, I got carried away with satire here, guess I'm passionate about that trope.\nRIP Bessie ❤", ">\n\nAnd now begins the search for her successor.", ">\n\nThere's already a running list of really old people. Edie Ceccarelli was born a couple of months after her and is now the oldest living person in the US. A couple months after her is Hazel Plummer. The oldest person in the world is in France, she'll turn 119 next month.", ">\n\n1907... she has seen some scheisse", ">\n\nLiterally was too old for this shit. \nRest in power, Queen.", ">\n\nA true living fossil. What an incredible life.", ">\n\nAlso the last person ever to be named Bessie.", ">\n\nGoodbye, Bessie Mae - Jimi Hendrix\nThat's what comes to mind when I hear the name Bessie.", ">\n\nAmazing a person can live to 100 plus 15 years.", ">\n\nImagine having some great great grandchild born when you're 97 and getting to see them graduate high school" ]