Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset1

like 0

[ "Sometimes one may be sick by asymptomatic. Wearing a mask is being considerate to the other party.", ">\n\nThis isn’t an unpopular opinion. It’s just plain stupid. Uhhh… hello???? Covid ??? RSV??? Wearing a mask is a sign of respect for others well-being" ]

[ "Sometimes one may be sick by asymptomatic. Wearing a mask is being considerate to the other party.", ">\n\nThis isn’t an unpopular opinion. It’s just plain stupid. Uhhh… hello???? Covid ??? RSV??? Wearing a mask is a sign of respect for others well-being", ">\n\nReverse- talking to someone who is wearing a mask when you aren’t wearing a mask is rude. You don’t know what people are going through and what underlying conditions they have. If they are wearing a mask they’re probably terrified and having a conversation with them while not wearing a mask makes you a special kind of awful" ]

[]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water)." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNearly half of all Iraqis believe that Iran poses the biggest security threat to their country, according to statistics from the 2022 Arab Opinion Index.\n\"Politically, Iraq cannot form any government unless Tehran had the final say; Iran fulfilled its agenda in the country through its influence over the Iraqi ruling parties.\"\nIran has influence on Iraq's infrastructure and most major industries, and provides the country with one-third of its gas and electricity, despite Iraq's rich natural resources.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iraq^#1 Iran^#2 Iraqi^#3 Arab^#4 country^#5" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNearly half of all Iraqis believe that Iran poses the biggest security threat to their country, according to statistics from the 2022 Arab Opinion Index.\n\"Politically, Iraq cannot form any government unless Tehran had the final say; Iran fulfilled its agenda in the country through its influence over the Iraqi ruling parties.\"\nIran has influence on Iraq's infrastructure and most major industries, and provides the country with one-third of its gas and electricity, despite Iraq's rich natural resources.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iraq^#1 Iran^#2 Iraqi^#3 Arab^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nAh yes, and don't forget about the Jews, ermahgerd, evil Jews. Fuck sake." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNearly half of all Iraqis believe that Iran poses the biggest security threat to their country, according to statistics from the 2022 Arab Opinion Index.\n\"Politically, Iraq cannot form any government unless Tehran had the final say; Iran fulfilled its agenda in the country through its influence over the Iraqi ruling parties.\"\nIran has influence on Iraq's infrastructure and most major industries, and provides the country with one-third of its gas and electricity, despite Iraq's rich natural resources.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iraq^#1 Iran^#2 Iraqi^#3 Arab^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nAh yes, and don't forget about the Jews, ermahgerd, evil Jews. Fuck sake.", ">\n\nI mean… that’s literally fair as fuck lmaoo. They’ve conflicted in almost every regard under the sun for years now." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNearly half of all Iraqis believe that Iran poses the biggest security threat to their country, according to statistics from the 2022 Arab Opinion Index.\n\"Politically, Iraq cannot form any government unless Tehran had the final say; Iran fulfilled its agenda in the country through its influence over the Iraqi ruling parties.\"\nIran has influence on Iraq's infrastructure and most major industries, and provides the country with one-third of its gas and electricity, despite Iraq's rich natural resources.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iraq^#1 Iran^#2 Iraqi^#3 Arab^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nAh yes, and don't forget about the Jews, ermahgerd, evil Jews. Fuck sake.", ">\n\nI mean… that’s literally fair as fuck lmaoo. They’ve conflicted in almost every regard under the sun for years now.", ">\n\nTruly no greater contact sport on earth than arguing over the correct invisible sky man." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNearly half of all Iraqis believe that Iran poses the biggest security threat to their country, according to statistics from the 2022 Arab Opinion Index.\n\"Politically, Iraq cannot form any government unless Tehran had the final say; Iran fulfilled its agenda in the country through its influence over the Iraqi ruling parties.\"\nIran has influence on Iraq's infrastructure and most major industries, and provides the country with one-third of its gas and electricity, despite Iraq's rich natural resources.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iraq^#1 Iran^#2 Iraqi^#3 Arab^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nAh yes, and don't forget about the Jews, ermahgerd, evil Jews. Fuck sake.", ">\n\nI mean… that’s literally fair as fuck lmaoo. They’ve conflicted in almost every regard under the sun for years now.", ">\n\nTruly no greater contact sport on earth than arguing over the correct invisible sky man.", ">\n\nYou should take your finger out of your ass for a minute and use it to click on the article and read it. The Iraqis are mad because Iran is sending militas to ethnic cleanse Sunnis and moderate Shias out of Iraq. 10% of Iranians are Sunni. If this was a war of religion Iran would start by killing them. This is war so that Iran can keep exploiting and destabilizing its neighbors. Why do Westerners want to comment on international affairs when they don't want to do any research on politics or history, but instead just treat the subjects as dumb cavemen?" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNearly half of all Iraqis believe that Iran poses the biggest security threat to their country, according to statistics from the 2022 Arab Opinion Index.\n\"Politically, Iraq cannot form any government unless Tehran had the final say; Iran fulfilled its agenda in the country through its influence over the Iraqi ruling parties.\"\nIran has influence on Iraq's infrastructure and most major industries, and provides the country with one-third of its gas and electricity, despite Iraq's rich natural resources.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iraq^#1 Iran^#2 Iraqi^#3 Arab^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nAh yes, and don't forget about the Jews, ermahgerd, evil Jews. Fuck sake.", ">\n\nI mean… that’s literally fair as fuck lmaoo. They’ve conflicted in almost every regard under the sun for years now.", ">\n\nTruly no greater contact sport on earth than arguing over the correct invisible sky man.", ">\n\nYou should take your finger out of your ass for a minute and use it to click on the article and read it. The Iraqis are mad because Iran is sending militas to ethnic cleanse Sunnis and moderate Shias out of Iraq. 10% of Iranians are Sunni. If this was a war of religion Iran would start by killing them. This is war so that Iran can keep exploiting and destabilizing its neighbors. Why do Westerners want to comment on international affairs when they don't want to do any research on politics or history, but instead just treat the subjects as dumb cavemen?", ">\n\nPrivileged ass people just like to minimize the less privileged’s problems by chalking them up to being simplistic and far beneath them, when in actuality they’re far more complex. They’d see how complex the problems were if they did a tiny bit of research but clearly that requires too much effort, but rest assured as an Iraqi I can tell you firsthand that the conflict is far more than “whose sky man is better”" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNearly half of all Iraqis believe that Iran poses the biggest security threat to their country, according to statistics from the 2022 Arab Opinion Index.\n\"Politically, Iraq cannot form any government unless Tehran had the final say; Iran fulfilled its agenda in the country through its influence over the Iraqi ruling parties.\"\nIran has influence on Iraq's infrastructure and most major industries, and provides the country with one-third of its gas and electricity, despite Iraq's rich natural resources.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iraq^#1 Iran^#2 Iraqi^#3 Arab^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nAh yes, and don't forget about the Jews, ermahgerd, evil Jews. Fuck sake.", ">\n\nI mean… that’s literally fair as fuck lmaoo. They’ve conflicted in almost every regard under the sun for years now.", ">\n\nTruly no greater contact sport on earth than arguing over the correct invisible sky man.", ">\n\nYou should take your finger out of your ass for a minute and use it to click on the article and read it. The Iraqis are mad because Iran is sending militas to ethnic cleanse Sunnis and moderate Shias out of Iraq. 10% of Iranians are Sunni. If this was a war of religion Iran would start by killing them. This is war so that Iran can keep exploiting and destabilizing its neighbors. Why do Westerners want to comment on international affairs when they don't want to do any research on politics or history, but instead just treat the subjects as dumb cavemen?", ">\n\nPrivileged ass people just like to minimize the less privileged’s problems by chalking them up to being simplistic and far beneath them, when in actuality they’re far more complex. They’d see how complex the problems were if they did a tiny bit of research but clearly that requires too much effort, but rest assured as an Iraqi I can tell you firsthand that the conflict is far more than “whose sky man is better”", ">\n\nWell... it's good not to be number one...\n...the U.S.A." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNearly half of all Iraqis believe that Iran poses the biggest security threat to their country, according to statistics from the 2022 Arab Opinion Index.\n\"Politically, Iraq cannot form any government unless Tehran had the final say; Iran fulfilled its agenda in the country through its influence over the Iraqi ruling parties.\"\nIran has influence on Iraq's infrastructure and most major industries, and provides the country with one-third of its gas and electricity, despite Iraq's rich natural resources.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iraq^#1 Iran^#2 Iraqi^#3 Arab^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nAh yes, and don't forget about the Jews, ermahgerd, evil Jews. Fuck sake.", ">\n\nI mean… that’s literally fair as fuck lmaoo. They’ve conflicted in almost every regard under the sun for years now.", ">\n\nTruly no greater contact sport on earth than arguing over the correct invisible sky man.", ">\n\nYou should take your finger out of your ass for a minute and use it to click on the article and read it. The Iraqis are mad because Iran is sending militas to ethnic cleanse Sunnis and moderate Shias out of Iraq. 10% of Iranians are Sunni. If this was a war of religion Iran would start by killing them. This is war so that Iran can keep exploiting and destabilizing its neighbors. Why do Westerners want to comment on international affairs when they don't want to do any research on politics or history, but instead just treat the subjects as dumb cavemen?", ">\n\nPrivileged ass people just like to minimize the less privileged’s problems by chalking them up to being simplistic and far beneath them, when in actuality they’re far more complex. They’d see how complex the problems were if they did a tiny bit of research but clearly that requires too much effort, but rest assured as an Iraqi I can tell you firsthand that the conflict is far more than “whose sky man is better”", ">\n\nWell... it's good not to be number one...\n...the U.S.A.", ">\n\nTitle may lead folks not to read the article, and note Israel and the US are seen the primary threats by numerous regional countries." ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNearly half of all Iraqis believe that Iran poses the biggest security threat to their country, according to statistics from the 2022 Arab Opinion Index.\n\"Politically, Iraq cannot form any government unless Tehran had the final say; Iran fulfilled its agenda in the country through its influence over the Iraqi ruling parties.\"\nIran has influence on Iraq's infrastructure and most major industries, and provides the country with one-third of its gas and electricity, despite Iraq's rich natural resources.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iraq^#1 Iran^#2 Iraqi^#3 Arab^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nAh yes, and don't forget about the Jews, ermahgerd, evil Jews. Fuck sake.", ">\n\nI mean… that’s literally fair as fuck lmaoo. They’ve conflicted in almost every regard under the sun for years now.", ">\n\nTruly no greater contact sport on earth than arguing over the correct invisible sky man.", ">\n\nYou should take your finger out of your ass for a minute and use it to click on the article and read it. The Iraqis are mad because Iran is sending militas to ethnic cleanse Sunnis and moderate Shias out of Iraq. 10% of Iranians are Sunni. If this was a war of religion Iran would start by killing them. This is war so that Iran can keep exploiting and destabilizing its neighbors. Why do Westerners want to comment on international affairs when they don't want to do any research on politics or history, but instead just treat the subjects as dumb cavemen?", ">\n\nPrivileged ass people just like to minimize the less privileged’s problems by chalking them up to being simplistic and far beneath them, when in actuality they’re far more complex. They’d see how complex the problems were if they did a tiny bit of research but clearly that requires too much effort, but rest assured as an Iraqi I can tell you firsthand that the conflict is far more than “whose sky man is better”", ">\n\nWell... it's good not to be number one...\n...the U.S.A.", ">\n\nTitle may lead folks not to read the article, and note Israel and the US are seen the primary threats by numerous regional countries.", ">\n\nNot saying it is wrong. But i whould like to see what have been in the news lately, and the sauce(yas) for it" ]

[ "Iran iraq conflict is old as fuck", ">\n\nAnd one of the bloodiest wars in recent memory with Saddam using chemical warfare against Iranians also not one sided like this thread seems to imply the two sides have great reason to have disdain for each other.", ">\n\nI wish it was that simple, what if you get carried by 6 regardless", ">\n\nConsidering Iran has a private army in Iraq that’s larger than the Iraqi military…yeah no shit", ">\n\nWhat militia is this? There are so many on the Middle East I can’t keep track lol.", ">\n\nQuds Force is essentially the direct sponsor of every Shia militia in Iraq, but the most prominent militia is Kata'ib Hezbollah, the militia that raided the US Embassy in Baghdad on 27 December 2019 and who's leader was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a member of Quds Force and the guy who Qasem Soleimani, the leader of Quds Force, was meeting with in Iraq when the US assassinated both of them with an airstrike on 3 January 2020.", ">\n\nFor a very related statistic, Iraq is about 40% Sunni and Iran has been meddling in Iraqi affairs for decades after the end of the Iraq / Iran War - especially after Saddam was deposed.", ">\n\nThat's why I'm really surprised by the survey, I thought Iran would have high approval ratings in Iraq.", ">\n\nI've had this discussion with an Iraqi Shiite. He said that the Arab/Persian antipathy is stronger than the Shiite/Shiite solidarity. Iraqi Shiites have sought Iranian support when they saw it as their best option, but it was always a relationship of need and convenience, never of affection or preference.", ">\n\nI had a Persian coworker that came to Canada as a religious refugee (he was atheist) and he absolutely despised Arabs, claimed they ruined his country and they’re the ones that turned it into a religious hellhole. \nBefore that I didn’t had no clue there was tension between the groups, guess I thought they were all Muslim brothers or something lol", ">\n\nLol so I went to an “expat drinks night” at a bar in my city and somehow I ended up in a group with, among others, an Israeli, an Indian, and a Persian. The Indian guy was talking about how Iran is a pretty popular vacation destination for Asians and the Israeli girl responded with “Yeah I’d never be allowed to go. Israelis don’t usually vacation in Arab countries anyway.” It was actually the Indian guy who pointed out that Iran isn’t arabic and she said “Yeah in Israel, we just call everyone who speaks Arabic an Arab.” \nI thought I was going to witness a murder that night.", ">\n\nInterestingly Hindi and Farsi have some similarities because of the history of trade. In fact the name Punjab stems from farsi meaning 5 rivers (water).", ">\n\nThey have similarities because they're both from the same language family and Persian used to be an official language of the Mughal Empire. Though I don't really think Iran is as popular a destination for travel in India.", ">\n\nIran is the biggest security threat to Iran too.", ">\n\nI'm reminded of the Al-Shaheed Monument in Iraq. Like many war memorials, an achingly beautiful reminder of horrific conflict", ">\n\nAnd now the Iranian regime is finally suffering under the demographics they created with that war as everyone has been predicting for 20 years.", ">\n\nOnly half?", ">\n\nThe other half is Shia", ">\n\nPretty sure they (pro-Iranians) killed like 800 shia during the 2019-2021 protests\nA more believeable number would be closer to 2/3 of Iraqis.", ">\n\nWesterners have always treated Iraqis as some sort of cultural monolith. Cheney supposedly dropped a 800 page report about the religions and cultures of Iraq into the trash before he was about to invade one the most ethically diverse regions on earth.", ">\n\nProblem was it wasn't covered in bbq sauce.", ">\n\nAnd their belief is correct", ">\n\nAlso from the article:\n\nThe Arab Opinion Index is an annual survey conducted by the Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies in order to gauge Arab public opinion on political and cultural matters. The 2022 poll included interviews with 33,300 people across 14 Arab countries.\nAcross the Arab World, a third of all respondents view Israel as the biggest threat to their country’s security. Only 9% identified Iran as the biggest security threat - behind both Israel and the United States. \nHowever, Iraq's statistics differ significantly from the Arab average, likely because of Iran’s direct interference in Iraqi affairs over the past two decades.\nIraqis also expressed opposition to Israel and the United States in the survey. The overwhelming majority of respondents from Iraq - 92% - were opposed to recognising Israel.\nThe Iraqi parliament passed a law in May 2022 criminalising relations with Israel.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 90%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNearly half of all Iraqis believe that Iran poses the biggest security threat to their country, according to statistics from the 2022 Arab Opinion Index.\n\"Politically, Iraq cannot form any government unless Tehran had the final say; Iran fulfilled its agenda in the country through its influence over the Iraqi ruling parties.\"\nIran has influence on Iraq's infrastructure and most major industries, and provides the country with one-third of its gas and electricity, despite Iraq's rich natural resources.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Iraq^#1 Iran^#2 Iraqi^#3 Arab^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nAh yes, and don't forget about the Jews, ermahgerd, evil Jews. Fuck sake.", ">\n\nI mean… that’s literally fair as fuck lmaoo. They’ve conflicted in almost every regard under the sun for years now.", ">\n\nTruly no greater contact sport on earth than arguing over the correct invisible sky man.", ">\n\nYou should take your finger out of your ass for a minute and use it to click on the article and read it. The Iraqis are mad because Iran is sending militas to ethnic cleanse Sunnis and moderate Shias out of Iraq. 10% of Iranians are Sunni. If this was a war of religion Iran would start by killing them. This is war so that Iran can keep exploiting and destabilizing its neighbors. Why do Westerners want to comment on international affairs when they don't want to do any research on politics or history, but instead just treat the subjects as dumb cavemen?", ">\n\nPrivileged ass people just like to minimize the less privileged’s problems by chalking them up to being simplistic and far beneath them, when in actuality they’re far more complex. They’d see how complex the problems were if they did a tiny bit of research but clearly that requires too much effort, but rest assured as an Iraqi I can tell you firsthand that the conflict is far more than “whose sky man is better”", ">\n\nWell... it's good not to be number one...\n...the U.S.A.", ">\n\nTitle may lead folks not to read the article, and note Israel and the US are seen the primary threats by numerous regional countries.", ">\n\nNot saying it is wrong. But i whould like to see what have been in the news lately, and the sauce(yas) for it", ">\n\nIn second and third place came the Iroquois and Ireland, respectively." ]

[]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\"." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club)." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\"." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly.", ">\n\nA lot of people don’t understand or fail to mention that, for a lot of anti-abortion, pro-“life”, religious zealots, that a fundamental belief lies in the fact that, for centuries, it was believed that women found their salvation through being lorded over men and through birthing children, as found first in Genesis 3:16:\n“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’”\nAnd it’s more explicit in the New Testament, in 1 Timothy 2:15: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”\nEven if people don’t explicitly believe this anymore, there’s a lot of stigma around women who don’t have children in religious communities than there is outside of them. This kind of thinking in “all women must go through a near death experience that is birthing a child and having to raise it” is pigeonholed into and applied to ALL women as a default since it’s ultimately found in the Bible.\nI mean, the else or women going to do with their lives, time, energy and money without kids to raise, huh?…/s" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly.", ">\n\nA lot of people don’t understand or fail to mention that, for a lot of anti-abortion, pro-“life”, religious zealots, that a fundamental belief lies in the fact that, for centuries, it was believed that women found their salvation through being lorded over men and through birthing children, as found first in Genesis 3:16:\n“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’”\nAnd it’s more explicit in the New Testament, in 1 Timothy 2:15: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”\nEven if people don’t explicitly believe this anymore, there’s a lot of stigma around women who don’t have children in religious communities than there is outside of them. This kind of thinking in “all women must go through a near death experience that is birthing a child and having to raise it” is pigeonholed into and applied to ALL women as a default since it’s ultimately found in the Bible.\nI mean, the else or women going to do with their lives, time, energy and money without kids to raise, huh?…/s", ">\n\nGreat now do albuteral" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly.", ">\n\nA lot of people don’t understand or fail to mention that, for a lot of anti-abortion, pro-“life”, religious zealots, that a fundamental belief lies in the fact that, for centuries, it was believed that women found their salvation through being lorded over men and through birthing children, as found first in Genesis 3:16:\n“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’”\nAnd it’s more explicit in the New Testament, in 1 Timothy 2:15: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”\nEven if people don’t explicitly believe this anymore, there’s a lot of stigma around women who don’t have children in religious communities than there is outside of them. This kind of thinking in “all women must go through a near death experience that is birthing a child and having to raise it” is pigeonholed into and applied to ALL women as a default since it’s ultimately found in the Bible.\nI mean, the else or women going to do with their lives, time, energy and money without kids to raise, huh?…/s", ">\n\nGreat now do albuteral", ">\n\nIsn't that asthma's rescue inhaler drug? Is it not otc?" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly.", ">\n\nA lot of people don’t understand or fail to mention that, for a lot of anti-abortion, pro-“life”, religious zealots, that a fundamental belief lies in the fact that, for centuries, it was believed that women found their salvation through being lorded over men and through birthing children, as found first in Genesis 3:16:\n“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’”\nAnd it’s more explicit in the New Testament, in 1 Timothy 2:15: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”\nEven if people don’t explicitly believe this anymore, there’s a lot of stigma around women who don’t have children in religious communities than there is outside of them. This kind of thinking in “all women must go through a near death experience that is birthing a child and having to raise it” is pigeonholed into and applied to ALL women as a default since it’s ultimately found in the Bible.\nI mean, the else or women going to do with their lives, time, energy and money without kids to raise, huh?…/s", ">\n\nGreat now do albuteral", ">\n\nIsn't that asthma's rescue inhaler drug? Is it not otc?", ">\n\nIt is unfortunately used as a performance enhancing drug in many sports, so this is also unlikely. ~~At the same time you can't get the old style epinephrine based inhalers OTC either.~~ edit: The OTC inhaler was discontinued for 7 years, but is back now." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly.", ">\n\nA lot of people don’t understand or fail to mention that, for a lot of anti-abortion, pro-“life”, religious zealots, that a fundamental belief lies in the fact that, for centuries, it was believed that women found their salvation through being lorded over men and through birthing children, as found first in Genesis 3:16:\n“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’”\nAnd it’s more explicit in the New Testament, in 1 Timothy 2:15: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”\nEven if people don’t explicitly believe this anymore, there’s a lot of stigma around women who don’t have children in religious communities than there is outside of them. This kind of thinking in “all women must go through a near death experience that is birthing a child and having to raise it” is pigeonholed into and applied to ALL women as a default since it’s ultimately found in the Bible.\nI mean, the else or women going to do with their lives, time, energy and money without kids to raise, huh?…/s", ">\n\nGreat now do albuteral", ">\n\nIsn't that asthma's rescue inhaler drug? Is it not otc?", ">\n\nIt is unfortunately used as a performance enhancing drug in many sports, so this is also unlikely. ~~At the same time you can't get the old style epinephrine based inhalers OTC either.~~ edit: The OTC inhaler was discontinued for 7 years, but is back now.", ">\n\nYou can buy Primitene mist OTC still they just did away with the one with CFC's. I believe it's behind the counter like sudafed." ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly.", ">\n\nA lot of people don’t understand or fail to mention that, for a lot of anti-abortion, pro-“life”, religious zealots, that a fundamental belief lies in the fact that, for centuries, it was believed that women found their salvation through being lorded over men and through birthing children, as found first in Genesis 3:16:\n“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’”\nAnd it’s more explicit in the New Testament, in 1 Timothy 2:15: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”\nEven if people don’t explicitly believe this anymore, there’s a lot of stigma around women who don’t have children in religious communities than there is outside of them. This kind of thinking in “all women must go through a near death experience that is birthing a child and having to raise it” is pigeonholed into and applied to ALL women as a default since it’s ultimately found in the Bible.\nI mean, the else or women going to do with their lives, time, energy and money without kids to raise, huh?…/s", ">\n\nGreat now do albuteral", ">\n\nIsn't that asthma's rescue inhaler drug? Is it not otc?", ">\n\nIt is unfortunately used as a performance enhancing drug in many sports, so this is also unlikely. ~~At the same time you can't get the old style epinephrine based inhalers OTC either.~~ edit: The OTC inhaler was discontinued for 7 years, but is back now.", ">\n\nYou can buy Primitene mist OTC still they just did away with the one with CFC's. I believe it's behind the counter like sudafed.", ">\n\nYou can but buy Primatene mist OTC but it’s not albuterol as the active ingredient…it’s epinephrine" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly.", ">\n\nA lot of people don’t understand or fail to mention that, for a lot of anti-abortion, pro-“life”, religious zealots, that a fundamental belief lies in the fact that, for centuries, it was believed that women found their salvation through being lorded over men and through birthing children, as found first in Genesis 3:16:\n“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’”\nAnd it’s more explicit in the New Testament, in 1 Timothy 2:15: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”\nEven if people don’t explicitly believe this anymore, there’s a lot of stigma around women who don’t have children in religious communities than there is outside of them. This kind of thinking in “all women must go through a near death experience that is birthing a child and having to raise it” is pigeonholed into and applied to ALL women as a default since it’s ultimately found in the Bible.\nI mean, the else or women going to do with their lives, time, energy and money without kids to raise, huh?…/s", ">\n\nGreat now do albuteral", ">\n\nIsn't that asthma's rescue inhaler drug? Is it not otc?", ">\n\nIt is unfortunately used as a performance enhancing drug in many sports, so this is also unlikely. ~~At the same time you can't get the old style epinephrine based inhalers OTC either.~~ edit: The OTC inhaler was discontinued for 7 years, but is back now.", ">\n\nYou can buy Primitene mist OTC still they just did away with the one with CFC's. I believe it's behind the counter like sudafed.", ">\n\nYou can but buy Primatene mist OTC but it’s not albuterol as the active ingredient…it’s epinephrine", ">\n\nRepublicans: WE LOVE CAPITALISM….wait not like that" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly.", ">\n\nA lot of people don’t understand or fail to mention that, for a lot of anti-abortion, pro-“life”, religious zealots, that a fundamental belief lies in the fact that, for centuries, it was believed that women found their salvation through being lorded over men and through birthing children, as found first in Genesis 3:16:\n“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’”\nAnd it’s more explicit in the New Testament, in 1 Timothy 2:15: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”\nEven if people don’t explicitly believe this anymore, there’s a lot of stigma around women who don’t have children in religious communities than there is outside of them. This kind of thinking in “all women must go through a near death experience that is birthing a child and having to raise it” is pigeonholed into and applied to ALL women as a default since it’s ultimately found in the Bible.\nI mean, the else or women going to do with their lives, time, energy and money without kids to raise, huh?…/s", ">\n\nGreat now do albuteral", ">\n\nIsn't that asthma's rescue inhaler drug? Is it not otc?", ">\n\nIt is unfortunately used as a performance enhancing drug in many sports, so this is also unlikely. ~~At the same time you can't get the old style epinephrine based inhalers OTC either.~~ edit: The OTC inhaler was discontinued for 7 years, but is back now.", ">\n\nYou can buy Primitene mist OTC still they just did away with the one with CFC's. I believe it's behind the counter like sudafed.", ">\n\nYou can but buy Primatene mist OTC but it’s not albuterol as the active ingredient…it’s epinephrine", ">\n\nRepublicans: WE LOVE CAPITALISM….wait not like that", ">\n\nShould be free for low income families and single mothers. Last thing we need is more kids growing up in poverty resorting to crime to survive" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly.", ">\n\nA lot of people don’t understand or fail to mention that, for a lot of anti-abortion, pro-“life”, religious zealots, that a fundamental belief lies in the fact that, for centuries, it was believed that women found their salvation through being lorded over men and through birthing children, as found first in Genesis 3:16:\n“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’”\nAnd it’s more explicit in the New Testament, in 1 Timothy 2:15: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”\nEven if people don’t explicitly believe this anymore, there’s a lot of stigma around women who don’t have children in religious communities than there is outside of them. This kind of thinking in “all women must go through a near death experience that is birthing a child and having to raise it” is pigeonholed into and applied to ALL women as a default since it’s ultimately found in the Bible.\nI mean, the else or women going to do with their lives, time, energy and money without kids to raise, huh?…/s", ">\n\nGreat now do albuteral", ">\n\nIsn't that asthma's rescue inhaler drug? Is it not otc?", ">\n\nIt is unfortunately used as a performance enhancing drug in many sports, so this is also unlikely. ~~At the same time you can't get the old style epinephrine based inhalers OTC either.~~ edit: The OTC inhaler was discontinued for 7 years, but is back now.", ">\n\nYou can buy Primitene mist OTC still they just did away with the one with CFC's. I believe it's behind the counter like sudafed.", ">\n\nYou can but buy Primatene mist OTC but it’s not albuterol as the active ingredient…it’s epinephrine", ">\n\nRepublicans: WE LOVE CAPITALISM….wait not like that", ">\n\nShould be free for low income families and single mothers. Last thing we need is more kids growing up in poverty resorting to crime to survive", ">\n\nThe republicans - \n( ͡ಠ ʖ̯ ͡ಠ)" ]

[ "And thus prescribed confidentially by USPS anywhere in the country then, right?", ">\n\nSounds like it's setting up a commerce clause case, and i have no doubt Alito will decide the founders did not intend for Article 1 to exist when they wrote it in 1787.", ">\n\n\"The founders were absolute geniuses. How else could they have my exact opinions from over 200 years later?\"", ">\n\nIf James Madison could see an semiautomatic rifle with a drum magazine he would turn over in his grave.", ">\n\nThe second amendment was intended to extend into siege weaponry and warships. \nI don't think that the founding fathers would have too much issue with being able to kill 100 people with one load out. \nThey probably would argue that the National Guard is the well-regulated militia they were talking about though.", ">\n\nThe founding father clearly intended the 2nd ammendment to extend to thermonuclear weapons.\nIf every white, protestant, land owning, male owned a fusion device then the U.S.A. would be impossible to attack. Who in their right mind would attack a country where a nuke could be hiding behind every blade of grass?", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nDid I just witness the birth of a copypasta", ">\n\nOnly if you continue to serve it up. That's kind of how this whole shitpost circle jerk works. lol", ">\n\nThe year is 3522, the Intergalactic Patriotic Super Supreme Court of the United Solar Systems of America face a new conundrum. The controversial \"big rip inducing device\" which has long kept peace by ensuring total annihilation of every atom in the universe should it be activated is now being brought into question as a form of 'arm' that the 2nd amendment guarantees the right to for every citizen. The IPSSCUSSofA is expected to rule in favor of freedom from tyranny, and every American will be granted the right to end all existence in the blink of an eye.", ">\n\nWith tele medicine they should make a online consultation, prescription and mail the medication to anyone in the nation bypassing the states and anti crowd completely.", ">\n\nThere are some people who do this, aidaccess offers to mail the abortion pill to any state where it is allowed and it is way cheaper than it would be at a clinic. Not a lot of people know about services like that but they are around.", ">\n\nThe testosterone crowd looking wise right now lol. \n​\nThis is like one of the main ways to get a proper T regime going since most docs will not help you get dialed into where you feel comfortable.", ">\n\nExactly how I got started.\nThen ince you are being treated for a while a GP can give you a prescription.", ">\n\nI'm changing GPs and this is one of the reasons. Now I need to find a new Endo. Urologist does a slightly better job but with 4 months between appointments it's hard to get dialed in.", ">\n\nArticle:\nThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing retail pharmacies to offer abortion pills in the United States for the first time, the agency said on Tuesday, as more states seek to ban medication abortion.\nPharmacies can apply for certification to distribute abortion pill mifepristone with one of the two companies that make it, and if successful they will be able to dispense it directly to patients upon receiving a prescription from a certified prescriber.\nThe FDA had first said it would be making those changes in December 2021 when it announced it would relax risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, or REMS, on the pill, that had been in place since the agency approved it in 2000 and were lifted temporarily by the government in 2021 due to the pandemic.\nDanco Laboratories and GenBioPro, the two companies that make the drug in the United States, submitted supplemental applications that have now been approved by the FDA.\n\"Under the Mifepristone REMS Program, as modified, Mifeprex and its approved generic can be dispensed by certified pharmacies or by or under the supervision of a certified prescriber,\" the agency said on its website on Tuesday.\nMifeprex is the brand name version of mifepristone, which in combination with a second drug called misoprostol that has various uses including miscarriage management, induces an abortion up to 10 weeks into a pregnancy in a process known as medication abortion.\nThe announcement will not provide equal access to all people, however, GenBioPro, which makes the generic version of mifepristone, said in a statement.\nAbortion bans, some targeting mifepristone, have gone into effect in more than a dozen states since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to terminating pregnancies when it scrapped its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling last year.\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\"We're reviewing the FDA's updated Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) drug safety program certification requirements for mifepristone to determine the requirements to dispense in states that do not restrict the dispensing of medications prescribed for elective termination of pregnancy,\" a spokesperson for drugstore chain owner CVS Health (CVS.N) said.\nA spokesperson for Walgreens, one of the largest U.S. pharmacies, said the company was also reviewing the FDA's regulatory change.", ">\n\nDo yourself a favor and flush it out -Frank Reynolds", ">\n\nI can't find anything about this online, does anyone have a link to a full news article?\nEdit for the people seeing this on Jan. 4:\nWhen this story was posted yesterday evening, the public portion of the article was a few sentences long and didn't even mention the drug name. Everyone in the comments was scratching their heads on what actually changed. Other news articles had the full info. This Reuters article was edited and added to substantially during business hours this morning. I'm sure someone noticed the fuckup online and got them to fix it.\nI trust Reuters and read their articles often, but it's frustrating when a posted article has almost zero useful information. Please stop messaging me about trusting mainstream media, holy crap. I just wanted the full info on what happened.", ">\n\nThank you! I don't know how I couldn't find anything on Google\nEdit: y'all I'm fully aware of how to use Google to search for news. Nothing came up in the general results or news search results for me.", ">\n\nBecause Google is more about shoving paid ads in your face than what you really want.", ">\n\nYep.\nIf the thing you're researching has any kind of market your results will be multiple pages of ads disguised as information. Ad blockers don't mean shit in 2023.", ">\n\nINB4 a conservative judge or 6-3 SCOTUS overrules this because the same shoddy reasoning as saying \n\nThe EPA, while created to control pollution, was not specifically given power over carbon dioxide by Congress. So that pollution limit, set by the EPA, is UN-enforceable.\" source", ">\n\nCO2 was not widely considered a pollutant when the EPA was created.\nThis abortion pill thing is different. When the court overturned Roe they said the constitution is silent on abortion so the federal government has no say. When the federal government has no say, the constitution says the states have jurisdiction. The FDA can approve the pill but some state will ban it setting up either a “states cannot ban pills approved by FDA” or an “interstate commerce challenge “ when a state who allows the pill sends it to one that doesn’t.", ">\n\nI am torn between those two schools of thought. \nA. Should judges interpret law via the language of the era it was written, or;\nB. Should judges interpret the law via the language of today\nI’m tempted to say B. and let the legislature do their jobs and update language of laws as needed. If anyone wants to tell me why I’m stupid, feel free.\nEdit> quick note, my reasoning can be applied to both A and B, something I didn’t really think about as my comment wasn’t (clearly) thought out very well.", ">\n\nB would mean courts can create any law they want though since \"language of today\" is very arbitrary. At that point congress would be powerless really since any law they created could be interpreted very differently by courts regardless of how clear it was written.\nThe most dangerous case is mixing A or B though as it fits your agenda since it would be a clear signal that courts are now sided.", ">\n\nBy this same logic, firearms covered by 2A should be limited to muskets and smooth bore cannon.", ">\n\nWhy not? Court decided EPA can't regulate Co2 by same logic or abortion isn't a covered right so it should also apply to 2A in the same way forcing legislative branch to amend all with today's need.\nAs long as we are consistent both options can work and system will adapt. Problems come up when it is not consistent.", ">\n\nThis application of logic only works when the Supreme Court isn’t overwhelmed with hypocritical judges hand-picked by a conservative organization to inconsistently interpret law", ">\n\nSince when does Reuters have an article limit???", ">\n\nThis is progress but this medication should be OTC given its stellar safety record and to foil forced pregnancy proponents.", ">\n\nYou can already buy it for horses at your tractor supply.", ">\n\nBut is it in a dose humans can take? I remember a lot of people trying to shut down their liver last year due to horse dewormer.", ">\n\nIt's usually possible to figure out what the prescribed weight should be and derive it from that.", ">\n\nThe tolerances in veterinary medicines are less stringent than for humans. The drug within the mount you are measuring is more variable and puts you at higher risk.", ">\n\nActually nope, most veterinary meds are also human meds. They are held to the dame quality standards unless using a compounding pharmacy.", ">\n\nYep, my cat was prescribed clopidogrel which is for humans. Kind of a problem because to dose it right it has to be cut into fourths, which exposes the extremely bitter inside of the pill that makes him salivate excessively if he tastes it, so administering it can be difficult.", ">\n\nSo that's why my cat drools like fucking crazy when I have to give him allergy meds", ">\n\nIf you can, pick up some size 5 empty gel caps to put the pill in and hide it in some wet food. That's what's been working for me.", ">\n\nCould states ban this? I understand the Supremacy and Commerce Clauses well enough, but I also don’t see why this could not be legally recognized by a red state as a controlled substance.\nDifferent states have different policies on marijuana for medical use, ranging from complete bans to regular medical prescriptions. Could these abortion pills not also be regulated the same way?", ">\n\nStates don’t really have the authority to “legalize” marijuana. If the federal government cared enough the legal marijuana experiment would be over immediately. There is nowhere in America where weed is actually legal to buy, sell, grow, possess, etc.", ">\n\nAh, but the legal challenge could destroy the current drug laws, especially with states like Oregon seeing massive revenues compared to their budgets. The weed legalization a strange détente in which both sides have more to lose if the current status quo changes.\nUnless the Federal Government could send in the Army, there aren't enough courts/judges/prosecutors/FBI/DEA to actually enforce the law at a federal level.", ">\n\nThey have the power of the purse. If Congress wanted weed to be illegal and enforced it would be. But it’s a losing political issue so they let it go and let states do their thing for now.", ">\n\nIsn't this how Reagan got the drinking age to 21?", ">\n\nFine by me, I’m all for choice! The more accessible, the better.", ">\n\n\"The president of anti-abortion group SBA Pro-Life America, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the latest FDA move endangers women's safety and the lives of unborn children.\"\nLike she gives a shit about the mother. To her, that's another potentially dead \"liberal\".", ">\n\n\nRetail pharmacies will have to weigh whether or not to offer the pill and determine where they can do so.\n\nAnti-abortion terrorists revising their death lists as we speak.", ">\n\nI worked for a Walgreens in OK and some pharmacists won’t even let you sell plan b or it’s generic, even though it’s an OVER THE COUNTER MEDICATION, due to their “morals”. Fuck them for that tbh. \nBonus: I was a sexual heath ambassador (internship) for one of the colleges in the state. Do you know how embarrassing it is that the state of Oklahoma won’t properly educate adolescents over safe sex? We educate incoming freshmen, etc. Every year we do a “sex in the dark panel” where students text in anonymous questions. Without a fail, we always get asked if inserting a green skittle into your vagina prevents pregnancy… \nThat was about 5 years ago and I still go back to donate condoms AND female condoms to their department. I personally don’t use female condoms, but my insurance covers it through Favor (previously The Pill Club).", ">\n\nHell places like Walgreens/cvs like doing the same shit for birth control, hrt, opiates, and the like, too. For the same reason.\nWill straight up refuse to fill, lie about stock, not fill full prescriptions, just based on their own moral reasons.", ">\n\nMy hometown Walgreens won’t fill my 0.5mg Xanax for anxiety but the town 30 min away will.. doc sent it early so it was on hold until I was eligible to refill. Sent it to be refilled, verified it was sent over to process, checked the status the next day after and it was put back into my request to fill account. \nWalmart has had an opiates max policy now after the lawsuit over the drug epidemic. Couldn’t even fill my moms full prescription post cancer removal surgery. Had to go to a mom and pop drugstore to get it filled.", ">\n\nI can't wait for the Supreme Court to pull out \"nowhere in the Constitution does the word 'pharmacy' appear\" and give states the power to not only ban the sale of abortion pills but also just outright ban over-the-counter medical dispensaries as \"facilitating abortion\".", ">\n\nGood, give women the choice of whether or not they want a 20+ year financial, emotional commitment.\nEdit: adding physical and mental to the list", ">\n\nMost importantly the choice to not risk life and limb to undergo a 9 month disability culminating in one of the most painful things a human can experience. It is shocking how little regard you'd have to have for women to think forcing something like that is okay, it's literal torture.", ">\n\nI read a comment here once from a father-to-be who said a doc told him, “birth is the time when women are closer to death than most people know” or something to that effect. Pregnancy and birth destroy our bodies. They are dangerous to both mother and child. It’s not something to force on people lightly.", ">\n\nA lot of people don’t understand or fail to mention that, for a lot of anti-abortion, pro-“life”, religious zealots, that a fundamental belief lies in the fact that, for centuries, it was believed that women found their salvation through being lorded over men and through birthing children, as found first in Genesis 3:16:\n“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pangs in childbirth exceedingly great; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.’”\nAnd it’s more explicit in the New Testament, in 1 Timothy 2:15: “Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”\nEven if people don’t explicitly believe this anymore, there’s a lot of stigma around women who don’t have children in religious communities than there is outside of them. This kind of thinking in “all women must go through a near death experience that is birthing a child and having to raise it” is pigeonholed into and applied to ALL women as a default since it’s ultimately found in the Bible.\nI mean, the else or women going to do with their lives, time, energy and money without kids to raise, huh?…/s", ">\n\nGreat now do albuteral", ">\n\nIsn't that asthma's rescue inhaler drug? Is it not otc?", ">\n\nIt is unfortunately used as a performance enhancing drug in many sports, so this is also unlikely. ~~At the same time you can't get the old style epinephrine based inhalers OTC either.~~ edit: The OTC inhaler was discontinued for 7 years, but is back now.", ">\n\nYou can buy Primitene mist OTC still they just did away with the one with CFC's. I believe it's behind the counter like sudafed.", ">\n\nYou can but buy Primatene mist OTC but it’s not albuterol as the active ingredient…it’s epinephrine", ">\n\nRepublicans: WE LOVE CAPITALISM….wait not like that", ">\n\nShould be free for low income families and single mothers. Last thing we need is more kids growing up in poverty resorting to crime to survive", ">\n\nThe republicans - \n( ͡ಠ ʖ̯ ͡ಠ)", ">\n\nGive them a second.\nThey're currently trying to smudge the historic precedents set about by years and years of people living their life without issue- because it's not amusing enough for them behind their castle walls." ]