id
stringlengths
14
28
title
stringclasses
18 values
content
stringlengths
2
999
contents
stringlengths
19
1.02k
Cell_Biology_Alberts_110
Cell_Biology_Alberts
molecular Biology Began with a spotlight on E. coli Because living organisms are so complex, the more we learn about any particular species, the more attractive it becomes as an object for further study. Each discovery raises new questions and provides new tools with which to tackle general questions in the context of the chosen organism. For this reason, large communities of biologists have become dedicated to studying different aspects of the same model organism.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. molecular Biology Began with a spotlight on E. coli Because living organisms are so complex, the more we learn about any particular species, the more attractive it becomes as an object for further study. Each discovery raises new questions and provides new tools with which to tackle general questions in the context of the chosen organism. For this reason, large communities of biologists have become dedicated to studying different aspects of the same model organism.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_111
Cell_Biology_Alberts
In the early days of molecular biology, the spotlight focused intensely on just one species: the Escherichia coli, or E. coli, bacterium (see Figures 1–13 and 1–14). This small, rod-shaped bacterial cell normally lives in the gut of humans and other vertebrates, but it can be grown easily in a simple nutrient broth in a culture bottle. It adapts to variable chemical conditions and reproduces rapidly, and it can evolve by mutation and selection at a remarkable speed. As with other bacteria, different strains of E. coli, though classified as members of a single species, differ genetically to a much greater degree than do different varieties of a sexually reproducing organism such as a plant or animal. One E. coli strain may possess many hundreds of genes that are absent from another, and the two strains could have as little as 50% of their genes in common. The standard laboratory strain
Cell_Biology_Alberts. In the early days of molecular biology, the spotlight focused intensely on just one species: the Escherichia coli, or E. coli, bacterium (see Figures 1–13 and 1–14). This small, rod-shaped bacterial cell normally lives in the gut of humans and other vertebrates, but it can be grown easily in a simple nutrient broth in a culture bottle. It adapts to variable chemical conditions and reproduces rapidly, and it can evolve by mutation and selection at a remarkable speed. As with other bacteria, different strains of E. coli, though classified as members of a single species, differ genetically to a much greater degree than do different varieties of a sexually reproducing organism such as a plant or animal. One E. coli strain may possess many hundreds of genes that are absent from another, and the two strains could have as little as 50% of their genes in common. The standard laboratory strain
Cell_Biology_Alberts_112
Cell_Biology_Alberts
E. coli K-12 has a genome of approximately 4.6 million nucleotide pairs, contained in a single circular molecule of DNA that codes for about 4300 different kinds of proteins (Figure 1–24). In molecular terms, we know more about E. coli than about any other living organism. Most of our understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of life— for example, how cells replicate their DNA, or how they decode the instructions represented in the DNA to direct the synthesis of specific proteins—initially came from studies of E. coli. The basic genetic mechanisms have turned out to be highly conserved throughout evolution: these mechanisms are essentially the same in our own cells as in E. coli.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. E. coli K-12 has a genome of approximately 4.6 million nucleotide pairs, contained in a single circular molecule of DNA that codes for about 4300 different kinds of proteins (Figure 1–24). In molecular terms, we know more about E. coli than about any other living organism. Most of our understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of life— for example, how cells replicate their DNA, or how they decode the instructions represented in the DNA to direct the synthesis of specific proteins—initially came from studies of E. coli. The basic genetic mechanisms have turned out to be highly conserved throughout evolution: these mechanisms are essentially the same in our own cells as in E. coli.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_113
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Prokaryotes (cells without a distinct nucleus) are biochemically the most diverse organisms and include species that can obtain all their energy and nutrients from inorganic chemical sources, such as the reactive mixtures of minerals released at hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor—the sort of diet that may have nourished the first living cells 3.5 billion years ago. DNA sequence comparisons reveal the family relationships of living organisms and show that the prokaryotes fall into two groups that diverged early in the course of evolution: the bacteria (or eubacteria) and the archaea. Together with the eukaryotes (cells with a membrane-enclosed nucleus), these constitute the three primary branches of the tree of life.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Prokaryotes (cells without a distinct nucleus) are biochemically the most diverse organisms and include species that can obtain all their energy and nutrients from inorganic chemical sources, such as the reactive mixtures of minerals released at hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor—the sort of diet that may have nourished the first living cells 3.5 billion years ago. DNA sequence comparisons reveal the family relationships of living organisms and show that the prokaryotes fall into two groups that diverged early in the course of evolution: the bacteria (or eubacteria) and the archaea. Together with the eukaryotes (cells with a membrane-enclosed nucleus), these constitute the three primary branches of the tree of life.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_114
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Most bacteria and archaea are small unicellular organisms with compact genomes comprising 1000–6000 genes. Many of the genes within a single organism show strong family resemblances in their DNA sequences, implying that they originated from the same ancestral gene through gene duplication and divergence. Family resemblances (homologies) are also clear when gene sequences are compared between different species, and more than 200 gene families have been so highly (A) 4,639,221 nucleotide pairs Escherichia coli K-12 origin of replication terminus of replication (B) Figure 1–24 The genome of E. coli. (A) A cluster of E. coli cells. (B) A diagram of the genome of
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Most bacteria and archaea are small unicellular organisms with compact genomes comprising 1000–6000 genes. Many of the genes within a single organism show strong family resemblances in their DNA sequences, implying that they originated from the same ancestral gene through gene duplication and divergence. Family resemblances (homologies) are also clear when gene sequences are compared between different species, and more than 200 gene families have been so highly (A) 4,639,221 nucleotide pairs Escherichia coli K-12 origin of replication terminus of replication (B) Figure 1–24 The genome of E. coli. (A) A cluster of E. coli cells. (B) A diagram of the genome of
Cell_Biology_Alberts_115
Cell_Biology_Alberts
E. coli strain k-12. The diagram is circular because the dnA of E. coli, like that of other prokaryotes, forms a single, closed loop. Protein-coding genes are shown as yellow or orange bars, depending on the dnA strand from which they are transcribed; genes encoding only RnA molecules are indicated by green arrows. some genes are transcribed from one strand of the dnA double helix (in a clockwise direction in this diagram), others from the other strand (counterclockwise). (A, courtesy of dr. Tony Brain and david Parker/Photo Researchers; B, adapted from F.R. Blattner et al., Science 277:1453–1462, 1997.) conserved that they can be recognized as common to most species from all three domains of the living world. Thus, given the DNA sequence of a newly discovered gene, it is often possible to deduce the gene’s function from the known function of a homologous gene in an intensively studied model organism, such as the bacterium E. coli.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. E. coli strain k-12. The diagram is circular because the dnA of E. coli, like that of other prokaryotes, forms a single, closed loop. Protein-coding genes are shown as yellow or orange bars, depending on the dnA strand from which they are transcribed; genes encoding only RnA molecules are indicated by green arrows. some genes are transcribed from one strand of the dnA double helix (in a clockwise direction in this diagram), others from the other strand (counterclockwise). (A, courtesy of dr. Tony Brain and david Parker/Photo Researchers; B, adapted from F.R. Blattner et al., Science 277:1453–1462, 1997.) conserved that they can be recognized as common to most species from all three domains of the living world. Thus, given the DNA sequence of a newly discovered gene, it is often possible to deduce the gene’s function from the known function of a homologous gene in an intensively studied model organism, such as the bacterium E. coli.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_116
Cell_Biology_Alberts
E. coli. Eukaryotic cells, in general, are bigger and more elaborate than prokaryotic cells, and their genomes are bigger and more elaborate, too. The greater size is accompanied by radical differences in cell structure and function. Moreover, many classes of eukaryotic cells form multicellular organisms that attain levels of complexity unmatched by any prokaryote.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. E. coli. Eukaryotic cells, in general, are bigger and more elaborate than prokaryotic cells, and their genomes are bigger and more elaborate, too. The greater size is accompanied by radical differences in cell structure and function. Moreover, many classes of eukaryotic cells form multicellular organisms that attain levels of complexity unmatched by any prokaryote.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_117
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Because they are so complex, eukaryotes confront molecular biologists with a special set of challenges that will concern us in the rest of this book. Increasingly, biologists attempt to meet these challenges through the analysis and manipulation of the genetic information within cells and organisms. It is therefore important at the outset to know something of the special features of the eukaryotic genome. We begin by briefly discussing how eukaryotic cells are organized, how this reflects their way of life, and how their genomes differ from those of prokaryotes. This leads us to an outline of the strategy by which cell biologists, by exploiting genetic and biochemical information, are attempting to discover how eukaryotic organisms work. eukaryotic cells may have originated as Predators
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Because they are so complex, eukaryotes confront molecular biologists with a special set of challenges that will concern us in the rest of this book. Increasingly, biologists attempt to meet these challenges through the analysis and manipulation of the genetic information within cells and organisms. It is therefore important at the outset to know something of the special features of the eukaryotic genome. We begin by briefly discussing how eukaryotic cells are organized, how this reflects their way of life, and how their genomes differ from those of prokaryotes. This leads us to an outline of the strategy by which cell biologists, by exploiting genetic and biochemical information, are attempting to discover how eukaryotic organisms work. eukaryotic cells may have originated as Predators
Cell_Biology_Alberts_118
Cell_Biology_Alberts
By definition, eukaryotic cells keep their DNA in an internal compartment called the nucleus. The nuclear envelope, a double layer of membrane, surrounds the nucleus and separates the DNA from the cytoplasm. Eukaryotes also have other features that set them apart from prokaryotes (Figure 1–25). Their cells are, typically, 10 times bigger in linear dimension and 1000 times larger in volume. They have an elaborate cytoskeleton—a system of protein filaments crisscrossing the cytoplasm and forming, together with the many proteins that attach to them, a system of girders, ropes, and motors that gives the cell mechanical strength, controls its shape, and drives and guides its movements (Movie 1.1). And the nuclear envelope is only one part of a set of internal membranes, each structurally similar to the plasma membrane and enclosing different types of spaces inside the cell, many of them involved in digestion and secretion. Lacking the tough cell wall of most bacteria, animal cells and the
Cell_Biology_Alberts. By definition, eukaryotic cells keep their DNA in an internal compartment called the nucleus. The nuclear envelope, a double layer of membrane, surrounds the nucleus and separates the DNA from the cytoplasm. Eukaryotes also have other features that set them apart from prokaryotes (Figure 1–25). Their cells are, typically, 10 times bigger in linear dimension and 1000 times larger in volume. They have an elaborate cytoskeleton—a system of protein filaments crisscrossing the cytoplasm and forming, together with the many proteins that attach to them, a system of girders, ropes, and motors that gives the cell mechanical strength, controls its shape, and drives and guides its movements (Movie 1.1). And the nuclear envelope is only one part of a set of internal membranes, each structurally similar to the plasma membrane and enclosing different types of spaces inside the cell, many of them involved in digestion and secretion. Lacking the tough cell wall of most bacteria, animal cells and the
Cell_Biology_Alberts_119
Cell_Biology_Alberts
to the plasma membrane and enclosing different types of spaces inside the cell, many of them involved in digestion and secretion. Lacking the tough cell wall of most bacteria, animal cells and the free-living eukaryotic cells called protozoa can change their shape rapidly and engulf other cells and small objects by phagocytosis (Figure 1–26).
Cell_Biology_Alberts. to the plasma membrane and enclosing different types of spaces inside the cell, many of them involved in digestion and secretion. Lacking the tough cell wall of most bacteria, animal cells and the free-living eukaryotic cells called protozoa can change their shape rapidly and engulf other cells and small objects by phagocytosis (Figure 1–26).
Cell_Biology_Alberts_120
Cell_Biology_Alberts
How all of the unique properties of eukaryotic cells evolved, and in what sequence, is still a mystery. One plausible view, however, is that they are all reflections of the way of life of a primordial cell that was a predator, living by capturing other cells and eating them (Figure 1–27). Such a way of life requires a large cell with a flexible plasma membrane, as well as an elaborate cytoskeleton to support Figure 1–25 The major features of eukaryotic cells. The drawing depicts a typical animal cell, but almost all the same components are found in plants and fungi as well as in single-celled eukaryotes such as yeasts and protozoa. Plant cells contain chloroplasts in addition to the components shown here, and their plasma membrane is surrounded by a tough external wall formed of cellulose.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. How all of the unique properties of eukaryotic cells evolved, and in what sequence, is still a mystery. One plausible view, however, is that they are all reflections of the way of life of a primordial cell that was a predator, living by capturing other cells and eating them (Figure 1–27). Such a way of life requires a large cell with a flexible plasma membrane, as well as an elaborate cytoskeleton to support Figure 1–25 The major features of eukaryotic cells. The drawing depicts a typical animal cell, but almost all the same components are found in plants and fungi as well as in single-celled eukaryotes such as yeasts and protozoa. Plant cells contain chloroplasts in addition to the components shown here, and their plasma membrane is surrounded by a tough external wall formed of cellulose.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_121
Cell_Biology_Alberts
and move this membrane. It may also require that the cell’s long, fragile DNA molecules be sequestered in a separate nuclear compartment, to protect the genome from damage by the movements of the cytoskeleton.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. and move this membrane. It may also require that the cell’s long, fragile DNA molecules be sequestered in a separate nuclear compartment, to protect the genome from damage by the movements of the cytoskeleton.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_122
Cell_Biology_Alberts
A predatory way of life helps to explain another feature of eukaryotic cells. All such cells contain (or at one time did contain) mitochondria (Figure 1–28). These small bodies in the cytoplasm, enclosed by a double layer of membrane, take up oxygen and harness energy from the oxidation of food molecules—such as sugars—to produce most of the ATP that powers the cell’s activities. Mitochondria are similar in size to small bacteria, and, like bacteria, they have their own genome in the form of a circular DNA molecule, their own ribosomes that differ from those elsewhere in the eukaryotic cell, and their own transfer RNAs. It is now generally accepted that mitochondria originated from free-living oxygen-metabolizing (aerobic) bacteria that were engulfed by an ancestral cell that could otherwise make no such use of oxygen (that is, was anaerobic). Escaping digestion, these bacteria evolved in symbiosis with the engulfing cell and its progeny, receiving
Cell_Biology_Alberts. A predatory way of life helps to explain another feature of eukaryotic cells. All such cells contain (or at one time did contain) mitochondria (Figure 1–28). These small bodies in the cytoplasm, enclosed by a double layer of membrane, take up oxygen and harness energy from the oxidation of food molecules—such as sugars—to produce most of the ATP that powers the cell’s activities. Mitochondria are similar in size to small bacteria, and, like bacteria, they have their own genome in the form of a circular DNA molecule, their own ribosomes that differ from those elsewhere in the eukaryotic cell, and their own transfer RNAs. It is now generally accepted that mitochondria originated from free-living oxygen-metabolizing (aerobic) bacteria that were engulfed by an ancestral cell that could otherwise make no such use of oxygen (that is, was anaerobic). Escaping digestion, these bacteria evolved in symbiosis with the engulfing cell and its progeny, receiving
Cell_Biology_Alberts_123
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–27 A single-celled eukaryote that eats other cells. (A) Didinium is a carnivorous protozoan, belonging to the group known as ciliates. It has a globular body, about 150 μm in diameter, encircled by two fringes of cilia—sinuous, whiplike appendages that beat continually; its front end is flattened except for a single protrusion, rather like a snout. (B) A Didinium engulfing its prey. Didinium normally swims around in the water at high speed by means of the synchronous beating of its cilia. When it encounters a suitable prey (yellow), usually another type of protozoan, it releases numerous small paralyzing darts from its snout region. Then, the Didinium attaches to and devours the other cell by phagocytosis, inverting like a hollow ball to engulf its victim, which can be almost as large as itself. (courtesy of d. Barlow.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–27 A single-celled eukaryote that eats other cells. (A) Didinium is a carnivorous protozoan, belonging to the group known as ciliates. It has a globular body, about 150 μm in diameter, encircled by two fringes of cilia—sinuous, whiplike appendages that beat continually; its front end is flattened except for a single protrusion, rather like a snout. (B) A Didinium engulfing its prey. Didinium normally swims around in the water at high speed by means of the synchronous beating of its cilia. When it encounters a suitable prey (yellow), usually another type of protozoan, it releases numerous small paralyzing darts from its snout region. Then, the Didinium attaches to and devours the other cell by phagocytosis, inverting like a hollow ball to engulf its victim, which can be almost as large as itself. (courtesy of d. Barlow.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts_124
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–26 Phagocytosis. This series of stills from a movie shows a human white blood cell (a neutrophil) engulfing a red blood cell (artificially colored red) that has been treated with an antibody that marks it for destruction (see movie 13.5). (courtesy of stephen e. malawista and Anne de Boisfleury chevance.) shelter and nourishment in return for the power generation they performed for their hosts. This partnership between a primitive anaerobic predator cell and an aerobic bacterial cell is thought to have been established about 1.5 billion years ago, when the Earth’s atmosphere first became rich in oxygen. As indicated in Figure 1–29, recent genomic analyses suggest that the first eukaryotic cells formed after an archaeal cell engulfed an aerobic bacterium. This would explain why all eukaryotic cells today, including those that live as strict anaerobes show clear evidence that they once contained mitochondria.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–26 Phagocytosis. This series of stills from a movie shows a human white blood cell (a neutrophil) engulfing a red blood cell (artificially colored red) that has been treated with an antibody that marks it for destruction (see movie 13.5). (courtesy of stephen e. malawista and Anne de Boisfleury chevance.) shelter and nourishment in return for the power generation they performed for their hosts. This partnership between a primitive anaerobic predator cell and an aerobic bacterial cell is thought to have been established about 1.5 billion years ago, when the Earth’s atmosphere first became rich in oxygen. As indicated in Figure 1–29, recent genomic analyses suggest that the first eukaryotic cells formed after an archaeal cell engulfed an aerobic bacterium. This would explain why all eukaryotic cells today, including those that live as strict anaerobes show clear evidence that they once contained mitochondria.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_125
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Many eukaryotic cells—specifically, those of plants and algae—also contain another class of small membrane-enclosed organelles somewhat similar to mitochondria—the chloroplasts (Figure 1–30). Chloroplasts perform photosynthesis, using the energy of sunlight to synthesize carbohydrates from atmospheric carbon dioxide and water, and deliver the products to the host cell as food. Like mitochondria, chloroplasts have their own genome. They almost certainly originated as symbiotic photosynthetic bacteria, acquired by eukaryotic cells that already possessed mitochondria (Figure 1–31).
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Many eukaryotic cells—specifically, those of plants and algae—also contain another class of small membrane-enclosed organelles somewhat similar to mitochondria—the chloroplasts (Figure 1–30). Chloroplasts perform photosynthesis, using the energy of sunlight to synthesize carbohydrates from atmospheric carbon dioxide and water, and deliver the products to the host cell as food. Like mitochondria, chloroplasts have their own genome. They almost certainly originated as symbiotic photosynthetic bacteria, acquired by eukaryotic cells that already possessed mitochondria (Figure 1–31).
Cell_Biology_Alberts_126
Cell_Biology_Alberts
A eukaryotic cell equipped with chloroplasts has no need to chase after other cells as prey; it is nourished by the captive chloroplasts it has inherited from its ancestors. Correspondingly, plant cells, although they possess the cytoskeletal equipment for movement, have lost the ability to change shape rapidly and to engulf other cells by phagocytosis. Instead, they create around themselves a tough, protective cell wall. If the first eukaryotic cells were predators on other organisms, we can view plant cells as cells that have made the transition from hunting to farming. Fungi represent yet another eukaryotic way of life. Fungal cells, like animal cells, possess mitochondria but not chloroplasts; but in contrast with animal cells and protozoa, they have a tough outer wall that limits their ability to move rapidly Figure 1–28 A mitochondrion. (A) A cross section, as seen in the electron microscope.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. A eukaryotic cell equipped with chloroplasts has no need to chase after other cells as prey; it is nourished by the captive chloroplasts it has inherited from its ancestors. Correspondingly, plant cells, although they possess the cytoskeletal equipment for movement, have lost the ability to change shape rapidly and to engulf other cells by phagocytosis. Instead, they create around themselves a tough, protective cell wall. If the first eukaryotic cells were predators on other organisms, we can view plant cells as cells that have made the transition from hunting to farming. Fungi represent yet another eukaryotic way of life. Fungal cells, like animal cells, possess mitochondria but not chloroplasts; but in contrast with animal cells and protozoa, they have a tough outer wall that limits their ability to move rapidly Figure 1–28 A mitochondrion. (A) A cross section, as seen in the electron microscope.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_127
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–28 A mitochondrion. (A) A cross section, as seen in the electron microscope. (B) A drawing of a mitochondrion with part of it cut away to show the three-dimensional structure (Movie 1.2). (c) A schematic eukaryotic cell, with the interior space of a mitochondrion, containing the mitochondrial dnA and ribosomes, colored. note the smooth outer membrane and the convoluted inner membrane, which houses the proteins that generate ATP from the oxidation of food molecules. (A, courtesy of daniel s. Friend.) Figure 1–29 The origin of mitochondria. archaeon) is thought to have engulfed the bacterial ancestor of mitochondria, initiating a symbiotic relationship. clear evidence of a dual bacterial and archaeal inheritance can be discerned today in the genomes of all eukaryotes.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–28 A mitochondrion. (A) A cross section, as seen in the electron microscope. (B) A drawing of a mitochondrion with part of it cut away to show the three-dimensional structure (Movie 1.2). (c) A schematic eukaryotic cell, with the interior space of a mitochondrion, containing the mitochondrial dnA and ribosomes, colored. note the smooth outer membrane and the convoluted inner membrane, which houses the proteins that generate ATP from the oxidation of food molecules. (A, courtesy of daniel s. Friend.) Figure 1–29 The origin of mitochondria. archaeon) is thought to have engulfed the bacterial ancestor of mitochondria, initiating a symbiotic relationship. clear evidence of a dual bacterial and archaeal inheritance can be discerned today in the genomes of all eukaryotes.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_128
Cell_Biology_Alberts
or to swallow up other cells. Fungi, it seems, have turned from hunters into scavengers: other cells secrete nutrient molecules or release them upon death, and fungi feed on these leavings—performing whatever digestion is necessary extracellularly, by secreting digestive enzymes to the exterior.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. or to swallow up other cells. Fungi, it seems, have turned from hunters into scavengers: other cells secrete nutrient molecules or release them upon death, and fungi feed on these leavings—performing whatever digestion is necessary extracellularly, by secreting digestive enzymes to the exterior.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_129
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The genetic information of eukaryotic cells has a hybrid origin—from the ancestral anaerobic archaeal cell, and from the bacteria that it adopted as symbionts. Most of this information is stored in the nucleus, but a small amount remains inside the mitochondria and, for plant and algal cells, in the chloroplasts. When mitochondrial DNA and the chloroplast DNA are separated from the nuclear DNA and individually analyzed and sequenced, the mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes are found to be degenerate, cut-down versions of the corresponding bacterial genomes. In a human cell, for example, the mitochondrial genome consists of only 16,569 nucleotide pairs, and codes for only 13 proteins, 2 ribosomal RNA components, and 22 transfer RNAs.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The genetic information of eukaryotic cells has a hybrid origin—from the ancestral anaerobic archaeal cell, and from the bacteria that it adopted as symbionts. Most of this information is stored in the nucleus, but a small amount remains inside the mitochondria and, for plant and algal cells, in the chloroplasts. When mitochondrial DNA and the chloroplast DNA are separated from the nuclear DNA and individually analyzed and sequenced, the mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes are found to be degenerate, cut-down versions of the corresponding bacterial genomes. In a human cell, for example, the mitochondrial genome consists of only 16,569 nucleotide pairs, and codes for only 13 proteins, 2 ribosomal RNA components, and 22 transfer RNAs.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_130
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–30 Chloroplasts. These organelles capture the energy of sunlight in plant cells and some single-celled eukaryotes. (A) A single cell isolated from a leaf of a flowering plant, seen in the light microscope, showing the green chloroplasts (Movie 1.3 and see movie 14.9). (B) A drawing of one of the chloroplasts, showing the highly folded system of internal membranes containing the chlorophyll molecules by which light is absorbed. (A, courtesy of Preeti dahiya.) early eukaryotic cell eukaryotic cell capable of photosynthesis
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–30 Chloroplasts. These organelles capture the energy of sunlight in plant cells and some single-celled eukaryotes. (A) A single cell isolated from a leaf of a flowering plant, seen in the light microscope, showing the green chloroplasts (Movie 1.3 and see movie 14.9). (B) A drawing of one of the chloroplasts, showing the highly folded system of internal membranes containing the chlorophyll molecules by which light is absorbed. (A, courtesy of Preeti dahiya.) early eukaryotic cell eukaryotic cell capable of photosynthesis
Cell_Biology_Alberts_131
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Many of the genes that are missing from the mitochondria and chloroplasts have not been lost; instead, they have moved from the symbiont genome into the DNA of the host cell nucleus. The nuclear DNA of humans contains many genes coding for proteins that serve essential functions inside the mitochondria; in plants, the nuclear DNA also contains many genes specifying proteins required in chloroplasts. In both cases, the DNA sequences of these nuclear genes show clear evidence of their origin from the bacterial ancestor of the respective organelle.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Many of the genes that are missing from the mitochondria and chloroplasts have not been lost; instead, they have moved from the symbiont genome into the DNA of the host cell nucleus. The nuclear DNA of humans contains many genes coding for proteins that serve essential functions inside the mitochondria; in plants, the nuclear DNA also contains many genes specifying proteins required in chloroplasts. In both cases, the DNA sequences of these nuclear genes show clear evidence of their origin from the bacterial ancestor of the respective organelle.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_132
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Natural selection has evidently favored mitochondria with small genomes. By contrast, the nuclear genomes of most eukaryotes seem to have been free to enlarge. Perhaps the eukaryotic way of life has made large size an advantage: predators typically need to be bigger than their prey, and cell size generally increases in proportion to genome size. Whatever the reason, aided by a massive accumulation of DNA segments derived from parasitic transposable elements (discussed in Chapter 5), the genomes of most eukaryotes have become orders of magnitude larger than those of bacteria and archaea (Figure 1–32). The freedom to be extravagant with DNA has had profound implications. Eukaryotes not only have more genes than prokaryotes; they also have vastly more DNA that does not code for protein. The human genome contains 1000 times as many nucleotide pairs as the genome of a typical bacterium, perhaps 10 times as Figure 1–31 The origin of chloroplasts.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Natural selection has evidently favored mitochondria with small genomes. By contrast, the nuclear genomes of most eukaryotes seem to have been free to enlarge. Perhaps the eukaryotic way of life has made large size an advantage: predators typically need to be bigger than their prey, and cell size generally increases in proportion to genome size. Whatever the reason, aided by a massive accumulation of DNA segments derived from parasitic transposable elements (discussed in Chapter 5), the genomes of most eukaryotes have become orders of magnitude larger than those of bacteria and archaea (Figure 1–32). The freedom to be extravagant with DNA has had profound implications. Eukaryotes not only have more genes than prokaryotes; they also have vastly more DNA that does not code for protein. The human genome contains 1000 times as many nucleotide pairs as the genome of a typical bacterium, perhaps 10 times as Figure 1–31 The origin of chloroplasts.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_133
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–31 The origin of chloroplasts. An early eukaryotic cell, already possessing mitochondria, engulfed a photosynthetic bacterium (a cyanobacterium) and retained it in symbiosis. Present-day chloroplasts are thought to trace their ancestry back to a single species of cyanobacterium that was adopted as an internal symbiont (an endosymbiont) over a billion years ago. Figure 1–32 Genome sizes compared. Genome size is measured in nucleotide pairs of dnA per haploid genome, that is, per single copy of the genome. (The cells of sexually reproducing organisms such as ourselves are generally diploid: they contain two copies of the genome, one inherited from the mother, the other from the father.) closely related organisms can vary widely in the quantity of dnA in their genomes, even though they contain similar numbers of functionally distinct genes. (data from
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–31 The origin of chloroplasts. An early eukaryotic cell, already possessing mitochondria, engulfed a photosynthetic bacterium (a cyanobacterium) and retained it in symbiosis. Present-day chloroplasts are thought to trace their ancestry back to a single species of cyanobacterium that was adopted as an internal symbiont (an endosymbiont) over a billion years ago. Figure 1–32 Genome sizes compared. Genome size is measured in nucleotide pairs of dnA per haploid genome, that is, per single copy of the genome. (The cells of sexually reproducing organisms such as ourselves are generally diploid: they contain two copies of the genome, one inherited from the mother, the other from the father.) closely related organisms can vary widely in the quantity of dnA in their genomes, even though they contain similar numbers of functionally distinct genes. (data from
Cell_Biology_Alberts_134
Cell_Biology_Alberts
W.h. li, molecular evolution, pp. 380–383. sunderland, mA: sinauer, 1997.) many genes, and a great deal more noncoding DNA (~98.5% of the genome for a human does not code for proteins, as opposed to 11% of the genome for the bacterium E. coli). The estimated genome sizes and gene numbers for some eukaryotes are compiled for easy comparison with E. coli in Table 1–2; we shall discuss how each of these eukaryotes serves as a model organism shortly.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. W.h. li, molecular evolution, pp. 380–383. sunderland, mA: sinauer, 1997.) many genes, and a great deal more noncoding DNA (~98.5% of the genome for a human does not code for proteins, as opposed to 11% of the genome for the bacterium E. coli). The estimated genome sizes and gene numbers for some eukaryotes are compiled for easy comparison with E. coli in Table 1–2; we shall discuss how each of these eukaryotes serves as a model organism shortly.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_135
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Much of our noncoding DNA is almost certainly dispensable junk, retained like a mass of old papers because, when there is little pressure to keep an archive small, it is easier to retain everything than to sort out the valuable information and discard the rest. Certain exceptional eukaryotic species, such as the puffer fish, bear witness to the profligacy of their relatives; they have somehow managed to rid themselves of large quantities of noncoding DNA. Yet they appear similar in structure, behavior, and fitness to related species that have vastly more such DNA (see Figure 4–71).
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Much of our noncoding DNA is almost certainly dispensable junk, retained like a mass of old papers because, when there is little pressure to keep an archive small, it is easier to retain everything than to sort out the valuable information and discard the rest. Certain exceptional eukaryotic species, such as the puffer fish, bear witness to the profligacy of their relatives; they have somehow managed to rid themselves of large quantities of noncoding DNA. Yet they appear similar in structure, behavior, and fitness to related species that have vastly more such DNA (see Figure 4–71).
Cell_Biology_Alberts_136
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Even in compact eukaryotic genomes such as that of puffer fish, there is more noncoding DNA than coding DNA, and at least some of the noncoding DNA certainly has important functions. In particular, it regulates the expression of adjacent genes. With this regulatory DNA, eukaryotes have evolved distinctive ways of controlling when and where a gene is brought into play. This sophisticated gene regulation is crucial for the formation of complex multicellular organisms. The Genome defines the Program of multicellular development The cells in an individual animal or plant are extraordinarily varied. Fat cells, skin cells, bone cells, nerve cells—they seem as dissimilar as any cells could be (Figure 1–33). Yet all these cell types are the descendants of a single fertilized egg cell, and all (with minor exceptions) contain identical copies of the genome of the species.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Even in compact eukaryotic genomes such as that of puffer fish, there is more noncoding DNA than coding DNA, and at least some of the noncoding DNA certainly has important functions. In particular, it regulates the expression of adjacent genes. With this regulatory DNA, eukaryotes have evolved distinctive ways of controlling when and where a gene is brought into play. This sophisticated gene regulation is crucial for the formation of complex multicellular organisms. The Genome defines the Program of multicellular development The cells in an individual animal or plant are extraordinarily varied. Fat cells, skin cells, bone cells, nerve cells—they seem as dissimilar as any cells could be (Figure 1–33). Yet all these cell types are the descendants of a single fertilized egg cell, and all (with minor exceptions) contain identical copies of the genome of the species.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_137
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The differences result from the way in which the cells make selective use of their genetic instructions according to the cues they get from their surroundings in the developing embryo. The DNA is not just a shopping list specifying the molecules that every cell must have, and the cell is not an assembly of all the items on the list. Rather, the cell behaves as a multipurpose machine, with sensors to receive environmental signals and with highly developed abilities to call different sets of genes into action according to the sequences of signals to which the cell has been exposed. The genome in each cell is big enough to accommodate the Figure 1–33 Cell types can vary enormously in size and shape. An animal nerve cell is compared here with a neutrophil, a type of white blood cell. Both are drawn to scale. information that specifies an entire multicellular organism, but in any individual cell only part of that information is used.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The differences result from the way in which the cells make selective use of their genetic instructions according to the cues they get from their surroundings in the developing embryo. The DNA is not just a shopping list specifying the molecules that every cell must have, and the cell is not an assembly of all the items on the list. Rather, the cell behaves as a multipurpose machine, with sensors to receive environmental signals and with highly developed abilities to call different sets of genes into action according to the sequences of signals to which the cell has been exposed. The genome in each cell is big enough to accommodate the Figure 1–33 Cell types can vary enormously in size and shape. An animal nerve cell is compared here with a neutrophil, a type of white blood cell. Both are drawn to scale. information that specifies an entire multicellular organism, but in any individual cell only part of that information is used.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_138
Cell_Biology_Alberts
information that specifies an entire multicellular organism, but in any individual cell only part of that information is used. A large number of genes in the eukaryotic genome code for proteins that regulate the activities of other genes. Most of these transcription regulators act by binding, directly or indirectly, to the regulatory DNA adjacent to the genes that are to be controlled, or by interfering with the abilities of other proteins to do so. The expanded genome of eukaryotes therefore not only specifies the hardware of the cell, but also stores the software that controls how that hardware is used (Figure 1–34).
Cell_Biology_Alberts. information that specifies an entire multicellular organism, but in any individual cell only part of that information is used. A large number of genes in the eukaryotic genome code for proteins that regulate the activities of other genes. Most of these transcription regulators act by binding, directly or indirectly, to the regulatory DNA adjacent to the genes that are to be controlled, or by interfering with the abilities of other proteins to do so. The expanded genome of eukaryotes therefore not only specifies the hardware of the cell, but also stores the software that controls how that hardware is used (Figure 1–34).
Cell_Biology_Alberts_139
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Cells do not just passively receive signals; rather, they actively exchange signals with their neighbors. Thus, in a developing multicellular organism, the same control system governs each cell, but with different consequences depending on the messages exchanged. The outcome, astonishingly, is a precisely patterned array of cells in different states, each displaying a character appropriate to its position in the multicellular structure. many eukaryotes live as solitary cells
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Cells do not just passively receive signals; rather, they actively exchange signals with their neighbors. Thus, in a developing multicellular organism, the same control system governs each cell, but with different consequences depending on the messages exchanged. The outcome, astonishingly, is a precisely patterned array of cells in different states, each displaying a character appropriate to its position in the multicellular structure. many eukaryotes live as solitary cells
Cell_Biology_Alberts_140
Cell_Biology_Alberts
many eukaryotes live as solitary cells Many species of eukaryotic cells lead a solitary life—some as hunters (the protozoa), some as photosynthesizers (the unicellular algae), some as scavengers (the unicellular fungi, or yeasts). Figure 1–35 conveys something of the astonishing variety of the single-celled eukaryotes. The anatomy of protozoa, especially, is often elaborate and includes such structures as sensory bristles, photoreceptors, sinuously beating cilia, leglike appendages, mouth parts, stinging darts, and musclelike contractile bundles. Although they are single cells, protozoa can be as intricate, as versatile, and as complex in their behavior as many multicellular organisms (see Figure 1–27, Movie 1.4, and Movie 1.5).
Cell_Biology_Alberts. many eukaryotes live as solitary cells Many species of eukaryotic cells lead a solitary life—some as hunters (the protozoa), some as photosynthesizers (the unicellular algae), some as scavengers (the unicellular fungi, or yeasts). Figure 1–35 conveys something of the astonishing variety of the single-celled eukaryotes. The anatomy of protozoa, especially, is often elaborate and includes such structures as sensory bristles, photoreceptors, sinuously beating cilia, leglike appendages, mouth parts, stinging darts, and musclelike contractile bundles. Although they are single cells, protozoa can be as intricate, as versatile, and as complex in their behavior as many multicellular organisms (see Figure 1–27, Movie 1.4, and Movie 1.5).
Cell_Biology_Alberts_141
Cell_Biology_Alberts
In terms of their ancestry and DNA sequences, the unicellular eukaryotes are far more diverse than the multicellular animals, plants, and fungi, which arose as three comparatively late branches of the eukaryotic pedigree (see Figure 1–17). As with prokaryotes, humans have tended to neglect them because they are microscopic. Only now, with the help of genome analysis, are we beginning to understand their positions in the tree of life, and to put into context the glimpses these strange creatures can offer us of our distant evolutionary past. A yeast serves as a minimal model eukaryote The molecular and genetic complexity of eukaryotes is daunting. Even more than for prokaryotes, biologists need to concentrate their limited resources on a few selected model organisms to unravel this complexity. Figure 1–34 Genetic control of the program of multicellular development.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. In terms of their ancestry and DNA sequences, the unicellular eukaryotes are far more diverse than the multicellular animals, plants, and fungi, which arose as three comparatively late branches of the eukaryotic pedigree (see Figure 1–17). As with prokaryotes, humans have tended to neglect them because they are microscopic. Only now, with the help of genome analysis, are we beginning to understand their positions in the tree of life, and to put into context the glimpses these strange creatures can offer us of our distant evolutionary past. A yeast serves as a minimal model eukaryote The molecular and genetic complexity of eukaryotes is daunting. Even more than for prokaryotes, biologists need to concentrate their limited resources on a few selected model organisms to unravel this complexity. Figure 1–34 Genetic control of the program of multicellular development.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_142
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–34 Genetic control of the program of multicellular development. The role of a regulatory gene is demonstrated in the snapdragon Antirrhinum. In this example, a mutation in a single gene coding for a regulatory protein causes leafy shoots to develop in place of flowers: because a regulatory protein has been changed, the cells adopt characters that would be appropriate to a different location in the normal plant. The mutant is on the left, the normal plant on the right. (courtesy of enrico coen and Rosemary carpenter.) To analyze the internal workings of the eukaryotic cell without the additional problems of multicellular development, it makes sense to use a species that is unicellular and as simple as possible. The popular choice for this role of minimal model eukaryote has been the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Figure 1–36)—the same species that is used by brewers of beer and bakers of bread.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–34 Genetic control of the program of multicellular development. The role of a regulatory gene is demonstrated in the snapdragon Antirrhinum. In this example, a mutation in a single gene coding for a regulatory protein causes leafy shoots to develop in place of flowers: because a regulatory protein has been changed, the cells adopt characters that would be appropriate to a different location in the normal plant. The mutant is on the left, the normal plant on the right. (courtesy of enrico coen and Rosemary carpenter.) To analyze the internal workings of the eukaryotic cell without the additional problems of multicellular development, it makes sense to use a species that is unicellular and as simple as possible. The popular choice for this role of minimal model eukaryote has been the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Figure 1–36)—the same species that is used by brewers of beer and bakers of bread.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_143
Cell_Biology_Alberts
S. cerevisiae is a small, single-celled member of the kingdom of fungi and thus, according to modern views, is at least as closely related to animals as it is to plants. It is robust and easy to grow in a simple nutrient medium. Like other fungi, it has a tough cell wall, is relatively immobile, and possesses mitochondria but not chloroplasts. When nutrients are plentiful, it grows and divides almost as rapidly as a bacterium. It can reproduce either vegetatively (that is, by simple cell division), or sexually: two yeast cells that are haploid (possessing a single copy of the genome) can fuse to create a cell that is diploid (containing a double genome); and the diploid cell can undergo meiosis (a reduction division) to produce cells that are once again haploid (Figure 1–37). In contrast with higher plants and animals, the yeast can divide indefinitely in either the haploid or the diploid state, and the process leading from one state to the other can be induced at will by changing the
Cell_Biology_Alberts. S. cerevisiae is a small, single-celled member of the kingdom of fungi and thus, according to modern views, is at least as closely related to animals as it is to plants. It is robust and easy to grow in a simple nutrient medium. Like other fungi, it has a tough cell wall, is relatively immobile, and possesses mitochondria but not chloroplasts. When nutrients are plentiful, it grows and divides almost as rapidly as a bacterium. It can reproduce either vegetatively (that is, by simple cell division), or sexually: two yeast cells that are haploid (possessing a single copy of the genome) can fuse to create a cell that is diploid (containing a double genome); and the diploid cell can undergo meiosis (a reduction division) to produce cells that are once again haploid (Figure 1–37). In contrast with higher plants and animals, the yeast can divide indefinitely in either the haploid or the diploid state, and the process leading from one state to the other can be induced at will by changing the
Cell_Biology_Alberts_144
Cell_Biology_Alberts
higher plants and animals, the yeast can divide indefinitely in either the haploid or the diploid state, and the process leading from one state to the other can be induced at will by changing the growth conditions.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. higher plants and animals, the yeast can divide indefinitely in either the haploid or the diploid state, and the process leading from one state to the other can be induced at will by changing the growth conditions.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_145
Cell_Biology_Alberts
In addition to these features, the yeast has a further property that makes it a convenient organism for genetic studies: its genome, by eukaryotic standards, is exceptionally small. Nevertheless, it suffices for all the basic tasks that every eukaryotic cell must perform. Mutants are available for essentially every gene, Figure 1–35 An assortment of protozoa: a small sample of an extremely diverse class of organisms. The drawings are done to different scales, but in each case the scale bar represents 10 μm. The organisms in (A), (c), and (G) are ciliates; is a heliozoan; (d) is an amoeba; is a dinoflagellate; and (F) is a euglenoid. (From m.A. sleigh, Biology of Protozoa. cambridge, uk: cambridge university Press, 1973.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts. In addition to these features, the yeast has a further property that makes it a convenient organism for genetic studies: its genome, by eukaryotic standards, is exceptionally small. Nevertheless, it suffices for all the basic tasks that every eukaryotic cell must perform. Mutants are available for essentially every gene, Figure 1–35 An assortment of protozoa: a small sample of an extremely diverse class of organisms. The drawings are done to different scales, but in each case the scale bar represents 10 μm. The organisms in (A), (c), and (G) are ciliates; is a heliozoan; (d) is an amoeba; is a dinoflagellate; and (F) is a euglenoid. (From m.A. sleigh, Biology of Protozoa. cambridge, uk: cambridge university Press, 1973.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts_146
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–36 The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (A) A scanning electron micrograph of a cluster of the cells. This species is also known as budding yeast; it proliferates by forming a protrusion or bud that enlarges and then separates from the rest of the original cell. many cells with buds are visible in this micrograph. (B) A transmission electron micrograph of a cross section of a yeast cell, showing its nucleus, mitochondrion, and thick cell wall. (A, courtesy of Ira herskowitz and eric schabatach.) Figure 1–37 The reproductive cycles of the yeast S. cerevisiae.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–36 The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (A) A scanning electron micrograph of a cluster of the cells. This species is also known as budding yeast; it proliferates by forming a protrusion or bud that enlarges and then separates from the rest of the original cell. many cells with buds are visible in this micrograph. (B) A transmission electron micrograph of a cross section of a yeast cell, showing its nucleus, mitochondrion, and thick cell wall. (A, courtesy of Ira herskowitz and eric schabatach.) Figure 1–37 The reproductive cycles of the yeast S. cerevisiae.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_147
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–37 The reproductive cycles of the yeast S. cerevisiae. depending on environmental conditions and on details of the genotype, cells of this species can exist in either a diploid (2n) state, with a double chromosome set, or a haploid (n) state, with a single chromosome set. The diploid form can either proliferate by ordinary cell-division cycles or undergo meiosis to produce haploid cells. The haploid form can either proliferate by ordinary cell-division cycles or undergo sexual fusion with another haploid cell to become diploid. meiosis is triggered by starvation and gives rise to spores—haploid cells in a dormant state, resistant to harsh environmental conditions.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–37 The reproductive cycles of the yeast S. cerevisiae. depending on environmental conditions and on details of the genotype, cells of this species can exist in either a diploid (2n) state, with a double chromosome set, or a haploid (n) state, with a single chromosome set. The diploid form can either proliferate by ordinary cell-division cycles or undergo meiosis to produce haploid cells. The haploid form can either proliferate by ordinary cell-division cycles or undergo sexual fusion with another haploid cell to become diploid. meiosis is triggered by starvation and gives rise to spores—haploid cells in a dormant state, resistant to harsh environmental conditions.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_148
Cell_Biology_Alberts
and studies on yeasts (using both S. cerevisiae and other species) have provided a key to many crucial processes, including the eukaryotic cell-division cycle—the critical chain of events by which the nucleus and all the other components of a cell are duplicated and parceled out to create two daughter cells from one. The control system that governs this process has been so well conserved over the course of evolution that many of its components can function interchangeably in yeast and human cells: if a mutant yeast lacking an essential yeast cell-division-cycle gene is supplied with a copy of the homologous cell-division-cycle gene from a human, the yeast is cured of its defect and becomes able to divide normally. The expression levels of All the Genes of An organism can Be monitored simultaneously
Cell_Biology_Alberts. and studies on yeasts (using both S. cerevisiae and other species) have provided a key to many crucial processes, including the eukaryotic cell-division cycle—the critical chain of events by which the nucleus and all the other components of a cell are duplicated and parceled out to create two daughter cells from one. The control system that governs this process has been so well conserved over the course of evolution that many of its components can function interchangeably in yeast and human cells: if a mutant yeast lacking an essential yeast cell-division-cycle gene is supplied with a copy of the homologous cell-division-cycle gene from a human, the yeast is cured of its defect and becomes able to divide normally. The expression levels of All the Genes of An organism can Be monitored simultaneously
Cell_Biology_Alberts_149
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The expression levels of All the Genes of An organism can Be monitored simultaneously The complete genome sequence of S. cerevisiae, determined in 1997, consists of approximately 13,117,000 nucleotide pairs, including the small contribution (78,520 nucleotide pairs) of the mitochondrial DNA. This total is only about 2.5 times as much DNA as there is in E. coli, and it codes for only 1.5 times as many distinct proteins (about 6600 in all). The way of life of S. cerevisiae is similar in many ways to that of a bacterium, and it seems that this yeast has likewise been subject to selection pressures that have kept its genome compact.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The expression levels of All the Genes of An organism can Be monitored simultaneously The complete genome sequence of S. cerevisiae, determined in 1997, consists of approximately 13,117,000 nucleotide pairs, including the small contribution (78,520 nucleotide pairs) of the mitochondrial DNA. This total is only about 2.5 times as much DNA as there is in E. coli, and it codes for only 1.5 times as many distinct proteins (about 6600 in all). The way of life of S. cerevisiae is similar in many ways to that of a bacterium, and it seems that this yeast has likewise been subject to selection pressures that have kept its genome compact.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_150
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Knowledge of the complete genome sequence of any organism—be it a yeast or a human—opens up new perspectives on the workings of the cell: things that once seemed impossibly complex now seem within our grasp. Using techniques described in Chapter 8, it is now possible, for example, to monitor, simultaneously, the amount of mRNA transcript that is produced from every gene in the yeast genome under any chosen conditions, and to see how this whole pattern of gene activity changes when conditions change. The analysis can be repeated with mRNA prepared from mutant cells lacking a chosen gene—any gene that we care to test. In principle, this approach provides a way to reveal the entire system of control relationships that govern gene expression—not only in yeast cells, but in any organism whose genome sequence is known. Arabidopsis has Been chosen out of 300,000 species As a model Plant
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Knowledge of the complete genome sequence of any organism—be it a yeast or a human—opens up new perspectives on the workings of the cell: things that once seemed impossibly complex now seem within our grasp. Using techniques described in Chapter 8, it is now possible, for example, to monitor, simultaneously, the amount of mRNA transcript that is produced from every gene in the yeast genome under any chosen conditions, and to see how this whole pattern of gene activity changes when conditions change. The analysis can be repeated with mRNA prepared from mutant cells lacking a chosen gene—any gene that we care to test. In principle, this approach provides a way to reveal the entire system of control relationships that govern gene expression—not only in yeast cells, but in any organism whose genome sequence is known. Arabidopsis has Been chosen out of 300,000 species As a model Plant
Cell_Biology_Alberts_151
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Arabidopsis has Been chosen out of 300,000 species As a model Plant The large multicellular organisms that we see around us—the flowers and trees and animals—seem fantastically varied, but they are much closer to one another in their evolutionary origins, and more similar in their basic cell biology, than the great host of microscopic single-celled organisms. Thus, while bacteria and archaea are separated by perhaps 3.5 billion years of evolution, vertebrates and insects are separated by about 700 million years, fish and mammals by about 450 million years, and the different species of flowering plants by only about 150 million years.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Arabidopsis has Been chosen out of 300,000 species As a model Plant The large multicellular organisms that we see around us—the flowers and trees and animals—seem fantastically varied, but they are much closer to one another in their evolutionary origins, and more similar in their basic cell biology, than the great host of microscopic single-celled organisms. Thus, while bacteria and archaea are separated by perhaps 3.5 billion years of evolution, vertebrates and insects are separated by about 700 million years, fish and mammals by about 450 million years, and the different species of flowering plants by only about 150 million years.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_152
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Because of the close evolutionary relationship between all flowering plants, we can, once again, get insight into the cell and molecular biology of this whole class of organisms by focusing on just one or a few species for detailed analysis. Out of the several hundred thousand species of flowering plants on Earth today, molecular biologists have chosen to concentrate their efforts on a small weed, the common Thale cress Arabidopsis thaliana (Figure 1–38), which can be grown indoors in large numbers and produces thousands of offspring per plant after 8–10 weeks. Arabidopsis has a total genome size of approximately 220 million nucleotide pairs, about 17 times the size of yeast’s (see Table 1–2). The World of Animal cells Is Represented By a Worm, a Fly, a Fish, a mouse, and a human
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Because of the close evolutionary relationship between all flowering plants, we can, once again, get insight into the cell and molecular biology of this whole class of organisms by focusing on just one or a few species for detailed analysis. Out of the several hundred thousand species of flowering plants on Earth today, molecular biologists have chosen to concentrate their efforts on a small weed, the common Thale cress Arabidopsis thaliana (Figure 1–38), which can be grown indoors in large numbers and produces thousands of offspring per plant after 8–10 weeks. Arabidopsis has a total genome size of approximately 220 million nucleotide pairs, about 17 times the size of yeast’s (see Table 1–2). The World of Animal cells Is Represented By a Worm, a Fly, a Fish, a mouse, and a human
Cell_Biology_Alberts_153
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The World of Animal cells Is Represented By a Worm, a Fly, a Fish, a mouse, and a human Multicellular animals account for the majority of all named species of living organisms, and for the largest part of the biological research effort. Five species have emerged as the foremost model organisms for molecular genetic studies. In order of increasing size, they are the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans, the fly Drosophila melanogaster, the zebrafish Danio rerio, the mouse Mus musculus, and the human, Homo sapiens. Each has had its genome sequenced.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The World of Animal cells Is Represented By a Worm, a Fly, a Fish, a mouse, and a human Multicellular animals account for the majority of all named species of living organisms, and for the largest part of the biological research effort. Five species have emerged as the foremost model organisms for molecular genetic studies. In order of increasing size, they are the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans, the fly Drosophila melanogaster, the zebrafish Danio rerio, the mouse Mus musculus, and the human, Homo sapiens. Each has had its genome sequenced.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_154
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Caenorhabditis elegans (Figure 1–39) is a small, harmless relative of the eel-worm that attacks crops. With a life cycle of only a few days, an ability to survive in a freezer indefinitely in a state of suspended animation, a simple body plan, and an unusual life cycle that is well suited for genetic studies (described in Chapter 21), it is an ideal model organism. C. elegans develops with clockwork precision from a fertilized egg cell into an adult worm with exactly 959 body cells (plus a variable number of egg and sperm cells)—an unusual degree of regularity for an animal. We now have a minutely detailed description of the sequence of events by which this occurs, as the cells divide, move, and change their character according to strict and predictable rules. The genome of 130 million nucleotide pairs codes for about 21,000 proteins, and many mutants and other tools are available for the testing of gene functions. Although the worm has a body plan very different from our own, the
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Caenorhabditis elegans (Figure 1–39) is a small, harmless relative of the eel-worm that attacks crops. With a life cycle of only a few days, an ability to survive in a freezer indefinitely in a state of suspended animation, a simple body plan, and an unusual life cycle that is well suited for genetic studies (described in Chapter 21), it is an ideal model organism. C. elegans develops with clockwork precision from a fertilized egg cell into an adult worm with exactly 959 body cells (plus a variable number of egg and sperm cells)—an unusual degree of regularity for an animal. We now have a minutely detailed description of the sequence of events by which this occurs, as the cells divide, move, and change their character according to strict and predictable rules. The genome of 130 million nucleotide pairs codes for about 21,000 proteins, and many mutants and other tools are available for the testing of gene functions. Although the worm has a body plan very different from our own, the
Cell_Biology_Alberts_155
Cell_Biology_Alberts
nucleotide pairs codes for about 21,000 proteins, and many mutants and other tools are available for the testing of gene functions. Although the worm has a body plan very different from our own, the conservation of biological mechanisms has been sufficient for the worm to be a model for many of the developmental and cell-biological processes that occur in the human body. Thus, for example, studies of the worm have been critical for helping us to understand the programs of cell division and cell death that determine the number of cells in the body—a topic of great importance for both developmental biology and cancer research.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. nucleotide pairs codes for about 21,000 proteins, and many mutants and other tools are available for the testing of gene functions. Although the worm has a body plan very different from our own, the conservation of biological mechanisms has been sufficient for the worm to be a model for many of the developmental and cell-biological processes that occur in the human body. Thus, for example, studies of the worm have been critical for helping us to understand the programs of cell division and cell death that determine the number of cells in the body—a topic of great importance for both developmental biology and cancer research.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_156
Cell_Biology_Alberts
studies in Drosophila Provide a key to vertebrate development The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Figure 1–40) has been used as a model genetic organism for longer than any other; in fact, the foundations of classical genetics were built to a large extent on studies of this insect. Over 80 years ago, it provided, for example, definitive proof that genes—the abstract units of hereditary information—are carried on chromosomes, concrete physical objects whose behavior had been closely followed in the eukaryotic cell with the light microscope, but whose function was at first unknown. The proof depended on one of the many features that make Drosophila peculiarly convenient for genetics—the giant chromosomes, with characteristic banded appearance, that are visible in Figure 1–38 Arabidopsis thaliana, the plant chosen as the primary model for studying plant molecular genetics. (courtesy of Toni hayden and the John Innes Foundation.) 0.2 mm
Cell_Biology_Alberts. studies in Drosophila Provide a key to vertebrate development The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Figure 1–40) has been used as a model genetic organism for longer than any other; in fact, the foundations of classical genetics were built to a large extent on studies of this insect. Over 80 years ago, it provided, for example, definitive proof that genes—the abstract units of hereditary information—are carried on chromosomes, concrete physical objects whose behavior had been closely followed in the eukaryotic cell with the light microscope, but whose function was at first unknown. The proof depended on one of the many features that make Drosophila peculiarly convenient for genetics—the giant chromosomes, with characteristic banded appearance, that are visible in Figure 1–38 Arabidopsis thaliana, the plant chosen as the primary model for studying plant molecular genetics. (courtesy of Toni hayden and the John Innes Foundation.) 0.2 mm
Cell_Biology_Alberts_157
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–38 Arabidopsis thaliana, the plant chosen as the primary model for studying plant molecular genetics. (courtesy of Toni hayden and the John Innes Foundation.) 0.2 mm Figure 1–39 Caenorhabditis elegans, the first multicellular organism to have its complete genome sequence determined. This small nematode, about 1 mm long, lives in the soil. most individuals are hermaphrodites, producing both eggs and sperm. (courtesy of maria Gallegos, university of Wisconsin, madison.) some of its cells (Figure 1–41). Specific changes in the hereditary information, manifest in families of mutant flies, were found to correlate exactly with the loss or alteration of specific giant-chromosome bands.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–38 Arabidopsis thaliana, the plant chosen as the primary model for studying plant molecular genetics. (courtesy of Toni hayden and the John Innes Foundation.) 0.2 mm Figure 1–39 Caenorhabditis elegans, the first multicellular organism to have its complete genome sequence determined. This small nematode, about 1 mm long, lives in the soil. most individuals are hermaphrodites, producing both eggs and sperm. (courtesy of maria Gallegos, university of Wisconsin, madison.) some of its cells (Figure 1–41). Specific changes in the hereditary information, manifest in families of mutant flies, were found to correlate exactly with the loss or alteration of specific giant-chromosome bands.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_158
Cell_Biology_Alberts
In more recent times, Drosophila, more than any other organism, has shown us how to trace the chain of cause and effect from the genetic instructions encoded in the chromosomal DNA to the structure of the adult multicellular body. Drosophila mutants with body parts strangely misplaced or mispatterned provided the key to the identification and characterization of the genes required to make a properly structured body, with gut, limbs, eyes, and all the other parts in their correct places. Once these Drosophila genes were sequenced, the genomes of vertebrates could be scanned for homologs. These were found, and their functions in vertebrates were then tested by analyzing mice in which the genes had been mutated. The results, as we see later in the book, reveal an astonishing degree of similarity in the molecular mechanisms that govern insect and vertebrate development (discussed in Chapter 21).
Cell_Biology_Alberts. In more recent times, Drosophila, more than any other organism, has shown us how to trace the chain of cause and effect from the genetic instructions encoded in the chromosomal DNA to the structure of the adult multicellular body. Drosophila mutants with body parts strangely misplaced or mispatterned provided the key to the identification and characterization of the genes required to make a properly structured body, with gut, limbs, eyes, and all the other parts in their correct places. Once these Drosophila genes were sequenced, the genomes of vertebrates could be scanned for homologs. These were found, and their functions in vertebrates were then tested by analyzing mice in which the genes had been mutated. The results, as we see later in the book, reveal an astonishing degree of similarity in the molecular mechanisms that govern insect and vertebrate development (discussed in Chapter 21).
Cell_Biology_Alberts_159
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The majority of all named species of living organisms are insects. Even if Drosophila had nothing in common with vertebrates, but only with insects, it would still be an important model organism. But if understanding the molecular genetics of vertebrates is the goal, why not simply tackle the problem head-on? Why sidle up to it obliquely, through studies in Drosophila?
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The majority of all named species of living organisms are insects. Even if Drosophila had nothing in common with vertebrates, but only with insects, it would still be an important model organism. But if understanding the molecular genetics of vertebrates is the goal, why not simply tackle the problem head-on? Why sidle up to it obliquely, through studies in Drosophila?
Cell_Biology_Alberts_160
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Drosophila requires only 9 days to progress from a fertilized egg to an adult; it is vastly easier and cheaper to breed than any vertebrate, and its genome is much smaller—about 200 million nucleotide pairs, compared with 3200 million for a human. This genome codes for about 15,000 proteins, and mutants can now be obtained for essentially any gene. But there is also another, deeper reason why genetic mechanisms that are hard to discover in a vertebrate are often readily revealed in the fly. This relates, as we now explain, to the frequency of gene duplication, which is substantially greater in vertebrate genomes than in the fly genome and has probably been crucial in making vertebrates the complex and subtle creatures that they are. The vertebrate Genome Is a Product of Repeated duplications
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Drosophila requires only 9 days to progress from a fertilized egg to an adult; it is vastly easier and cheaper to breed than any vertebrate, and its genome is much smaller—about 200 million nucleotide pairs, compared with 3200 million for a human. This genome codes for about 15,000 proteins, and mutants can now be obtained for essentially any gene. But there is also another, deeper reason why genetic mechanisms that are hard to discover in a vertebrate are often readily revealed in the fly. This relates, as we now explain, to the frequency of gene duplication, which is substantially greater in vertebrate genomes than in the fly genome and has probably been crucial in making vertebrates the complex and subtle creatures that they are. The vertebrate Genome Is a Product of Repeated duplications
Cell_Biology_Alberts_161
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The vertebrate Genome Is a Product of Repeated duplications Almost every gene in the vertebrate genome has paralogs—other genes in the same genome that are unmistakably related and must have arisen by gene duplication. In many cases, a whole cluster of genes is closely related to similar clusters present elsewhere in the genome, suggesting that genes have been duplicated in linked groups rather than as isolated individuals. According to one hypothesis, at an early stage in the evolution of the vertebrates, the entire genome underwent duplication twice in succession, giving rise to four copies of every gene. The precise course of vertebrate genome evolution remains uncertain, because many further evolutionary changes have occurred since these ancient events. Figure 1–40 Drosophila melanogaster.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The vertebrate Genome Is a Product of Repeated duplications Almost every gene in the vertebrate genome has paralogs—other genes in the same genome that are unmistakably related and must have arisen by gene duplication. In many cases, a whole cluster of genes is closely related to similar clusters present elsewhere in the genome, suggesting that genes have been duplicated in linked groups rather than as isolated individuals. According to one hypothesis, at an early stage in the evolution of the vertebrates, the entire genome underwent duplication twice in succession, giving rise to four copies of every gene. The precise course of vertebrate genome evolution remains uncertain, because many further evolutionary changes have occurred since these ancient events. Figure 1–40 Drosophila melanogaster.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_162
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The precise course of vertebrate genome evolution remains uncertain, because many further evolutionary changes have occurred since these ancient events. Figure 1–40 Drosophila melanogaster. molecular genetic studies on this fly have provided the main key to understanding how all animals develop from a fertilized egg into an adult. (From e.B. lewis, Science 221:cover, 1983. With permission from AAAs.) Figure 1–41 Giant chromosomes from salivary gland cells of Drosophila.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The precise course of vertebrate genome evolution remains uncertain, because many further evolutionary changes have occurred since these ancient events. Figure 1–40 Drosophila melanogaster. molecular genetic studies on this fly have provided the main key to understanding how all animals develop from a fertilized egg into an adult. (From e.B. lewis, Science 221:cover, 1983. With permission from AAAs.) Figure 1–41 Giant chromosomes from salivary gland cells of Drosophila.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_163
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–41 Giant chromosomes from salivary gland cells of Drosophila. Because many rounds of dnA replication have occurred without an intervening cell division, each of the chromosomes in these unusual cells contains over 1000 identical dnA molecules, all aligned in register. This makes them easy to see in the light microscope, where they display a characteristic and reproducible banding pattern. specific bands can be identified as the locations of specific genes: a mutant fly with a region of the banding pattern missing shows a phenotype reflecting loss of the genes in that region. Genes that are being transcribed at a high rate correspond to bands with a “puffed” appearance. The bands stained dark brown in the micrograph are sites where a particular regulatory protein is bound to the dnA. (courtesy of B. Zink and R. Paro, from R. Paro, Trends Genet. 6:416–421, 1990. With permission from elsevier.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–41 Giant chromosomes from salivary gland cells of Drosophila. Because many rounds of dnA replication have occurred without an intervening cell division, each of the chromosomes in these unusual cells contains over 1000 identical dnA molecules, all aligned in register. This makes them easy to see in the light microscope, where they display a characteristic and reproducible banding pattern. specific bands can be identified as the locations of specific genes: a mutant fly with a region of the banding pattern missing shows a phenotype reflecting loss of the genes in that region. Genes that are being transcribed at a high rate correspond to bands with a “puffed” appearance. The bands stained dark brown in the micrograph are sites where a particular regulatory protein is bound to the dnA. (courtesy of B. Zink and R. Paro, from R. Paro, Trends Genet. 6:416–421, 1990. With permission from elsevier.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts_164
Cell_Biology_Alberts
R. Paro, Trends Genet. 6:416–421, 1990. With permission from elsevier.) Genes that were once identical have diverged; many of the gene copies have been lost through disruptive mutations; some have undergone further rounds of local duplication; and the genome, in each branch of the vertebrate family tree, has suffered repeated rearrangements, breaking up most of the original gene orderings. Comparison of the gene order in two related organisms, such as the human and the mouse, reveals that—on the time scale of vertebrate evolution—chromosomes frequently fuse and fragment to move large blocks of DNA sequence around. Indeed, it is possible, as discussed in Chapter 4, that the present state of affairs is the result of many separate duplications of fragments of the genome, rather than duplications of the genome as a whole.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. R. Paro, Trends Genet. 6:416–421, 1990. With permission from elsevier.) Genes that were once identical have diverged; many of the gene copies have been lost through disruptive mutations; some have undergone further rounds of local duplication; and the genome, in each branch of the vertebrate family tree, has suffered repeated rearrangements, breaking up most of the original gene orderings. Comparison of the gene order in two related organisms, such as the human and the mouse, reveals that—on the time scale of vertebrate evolution—chromosomes frequently fuse and fragment to move large blocks of DNA sequence around. Indeed, it is possible, as discussed in Chapter 4, that the present state of affairs is the result of many separate duplications of fragments of the genome, rather than duplications of the genome as a whole.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_165
Cell_Biology_Alberts
There is, however, no doubt that such whole-genome duplications do occur from time to time in evolution, for we can see recent instances in which duplicated chromosome sets are still clearly identifiable as such. The frog genus Xenopus, for example, comprises a set of closely similar species related to one another by repeated duplications or triplications of the whole genome. Among these frogs are X. tropicalis, with an ordinary diploid genome; the common laboratory species X. laevis, with a duplicated genome and twice as much DNA per cell; and X. ruwenzoriensis, with a sixfold reduplication of the original genome and six times as much DNA per cell (108 chromosomes, compared with 36 in X. laevis, for example). These species are estimated to have diverged from one another within the past 120 million years (Figure 1–42). The Frog and the Zebrafish Provide Accessible models for vertebrate development
Cell_Biology_Alberts. There is, however, no doubt that such whole-genome duplications do occur from time to time in evolution, for we can see recent instances in which duplicated chromosome sets are still clearly identifiable as such. The frog genus Xenopus, for example, comprises a set of closely similar species related to one another by repeated duplications or triplications of the whole genome. Among these frogs are X. tropicalis, with an ordinary diploid genome; the common laboratory species X. laevis, with a duplicated genome and twice as much DNA per cell; and X. ruwenzoriensis, with a sixfold reduplication of the original genome and six times as much DNA per cell (108 chromosomes, compared with 36 in X. laevis, for example). These species are estimated to have diverged from one another within the past 120 million years (Figure 1–42). The Frog and the Zebrafish Provide Accessible models for vertebrate development
Cell_Biology_Alberts_166
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The Frog and the Zebrafish Provide Accessible models for vertebrate development Frogs have long been used to study the early steps of embryonic development in vertebrates, because their eggs are big, easy to manipulate, and fertilized outside of the animal, so that the subsequent development of the early embryo is easily followed (Figure 1–43). Xenopus laevis, in particular, continues to be an important model organism, even though it is poorly suited for genetic analysis (Movie 1.6 and see Movie 21.1).
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The Frog and the Zebrafish Provide Accessible models for vertebrate development Frogs have long been used to study the early steps of embryonic development in vertebrates, because their eggs are big, easy to manipulate, and fertilized outside of the animal, so that the subsequent development of the early embryo is easily followed (Figure 1–43). Xenopus laevis, in particular, continues to be an important model organism, even though it is poorly suited for genetic analysis (Movie 1.6 and see Movie 21.1).
Cell_Biology_Alberts_167
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The zebrafish Danio rerio has similar advantages, but without this drawback. Its genome is compact—only half as big as that of a mouse or a human—and it has a generation time of only about three months. Many mutants are known, and genetic engineering is relatively easy. The zebrafish has the added virtue that it is transparent for the first two weeks of its life, so that one can watch the behavior of individual cells in the living organism (see Movie 21.2). All this has made it an increasingly important model vertebrate (Figure 1–44). The mouse Is the Predominant mammalian model organism
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The zebrafish Danio rerio has similar advantages, but without this drawback. Its genome is compact—only half as big as that of a mouse or a human—and it has a generation time of only about three months. Many mutants are known, and genetic engineering is relatively easy. The zebrafish has the added virtue that it is transparent for the first two weeks of its life, so that one can watch the behavior of individual cells in the living organism (see Movie 21.2). All this has made it an increasingly important model vertebrate (Figure 1–44). The mouse Is the Predominant mammalian model organism
Cell_Biology_Alberts_168
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The mouse Is the Predominant mammalian model organism Mammals have typically two times as many genes as Drosophila, a genome that is 16 times larger, and millions or billions of times as many cells in their adult bodies. In terms of genome size and function, cell biology, and molecular mechanisms, mammals are nevertheless a highly uniform group of organisms. Even anatomically, the differences among mammals are chiefly a matter of size and proportions; it is hard to think of a human body part that does not have a counterpart in elephants and mice, and vice versa. Evolution plays freely with quantitative features, but it does not readily change the logic of the structure.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The mouse Is the Predominant mammalian model organism Mammals have typically two times as many genes as Drosophila, a genome that is 16 times larger, and millions or billions of times as many cells in their adult bodies. In terms of genome size and function, cell biology, and molecular mechanisms, mammals are nevertheless a highly uniform group of organisms. Even anatomically, the differences among mammals are chiefly a matter of size and proportions; it is hard to think of a human body part that does not have a counterpart in elephants and mice, and vice versa. Evolution plays freely with quantitative features, but it does not readily change the logic of the structure.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_169
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–42 Two species of the frog genus Xenopus. X. tropicalis, above, has an ordinary diploid genome; X. laevis, below, has twice as much dnA per cell. From the banding patterns of their chromosomes and the arrangement of genes along them, as well as from comparisons of gene sequences, it is clear that the large-genome species have evolved through duplications of the whole genome. These duplications are thought to have occurred in the aftermath of matings between frogs of slightly divergent Xenopus species. (courtesy of e. Amaya, m. offield, and R. Grainger, Trends Genet. 14:253– 255, 1998. With permission from elsevier.) Figure 1–43 Stages in the normal development of a frog. These drawings show the development of a Rana pipiens tadpole from a fertilized egg. The entire process takes place outside of the mother, making the mechanisms tail bud involved readily accessible for experimental studies. (From W. shumway, Anat. Rec. 78:139–147, 1940.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–42 Two species of the frog genus Xenopus. X. tropicalis, above, has an ordinary diploid genome; X. laevis, below, has twice as much dnA per cell. From the banding patterns of their chromosomes and the arrangement of genes along them, as well as from comparisons of gene sequences, it is clear that the large-genome species have evolved through duplications of the whole genome. These duplications are thought to have occurred in the aftermath of matings between frogs of slightly divergent Xenopus species. (courtesy of e. Amaya, m. offield, and R. Grainger, Trends Genet. 14:253– 255, 1998. With permission from elsevier.) Figure 1–43 Stages in the normal development of a frog. These drawings show the development of a Rana pipiens tadpole from a fertilized egg. The entire process takes place outside of the mother, making the mechanisms tail bud involved readily accessible for experimental studies. (From W. shumway, Anat. Rec. 78:139–147, 1940.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts_170
Cell_Biology_Alberts
For a more exact measure of how closely mammalian species resemble one another genetically, we can compare the nucleotide sequences of corresponding (orthologous) genes, or the amino acid sequences of the proteins that these genes encode. The results for individual genes and proteins vary widely. But typically, if we line up the amino acid sequence of a human protein with that of the orthologous protein from, say, an elephant, about 85% of the amino acids are identical. A similar comparison between human and bird shows an amino acid identity of about 70%—twice as many differences, because the bird and the mammalian lineages have had twice as long to diverge as those of the elephant and the human (Figure 1–45).
Cell_Biology_Alberts. For a more exact measure of how closely mammalian species resemble one another genetically, we can compare the nucleotide sequences of corresponding (orthologous) genes, or the amino acid sequences of the proteins that these genes encode. The results for individual genes and proteins vary widely. But typically, if we line up the amino acid sequence of a human protein with that of the orthologous protein from, say, an elephant, about 85% of the amino acids are identical. A similar comparison between human and bird shows an amino acid identity of about 70%—twice as many differences, because the bird and the mammalian lineages have had twice as long to diverge as those of the elephant and the human (Figure 1–45).
Cell_Biology_Alberts_171
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The mouse, being small, hardy, and a rapid breeder, has become the foremost model organism for experimental studies of vertebrate molecular genetics. Many naturally occurring mutations are known, often mimicking the effects of corresponding mutations in humans (Figure 1–46). Methods have been developed, moreover, to test the function of any chosen mouse gene, or of any noncoding portion of the mouse genome, by artificially creating mutations in it, as we explain later in the book. Just one made-to-order mutant mouse can provide a wealth of information for the cell biologist. It reveals the effects of the chosen mutation in a host of different contexts, simultaneously testing the action of the gene in all the different kinds of cells in the body that could in principle be affected. As humans, we have a special interest in the human genome. We want to know the full set of parts from which we are made, and to discover how they work. But even
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The mouse, being small, hardy, and a rapid breeder, has become the foremost model organism for experimental studies of vertebrate molecular genetics. Many naturally occurring mutations are known, often mimicking the effects of corresponding mutations in humans (Figure 1–46). Methods have been developed, moreover, to test the function of any chosen mouse gene, or of any noncoding portion of the mouse genome, by artificially creating mutations in it, as we explain later in the book. Just one made-to-order mutant mouse can provide a wealth of information for the cell biologist. It reveals the effects of the chosen mutation in a host of different contexts, simultaneously testing the action of the gene in all the different kinds of cells in the body that could in principle be affected. As humans, we have a special interest in the human genome. We want to know the full set of parts from which we are made, and to discover how they work. But even
Cell_Biology_Alberts_172
Cell_Biology_Alberts
As humans, we have a special interest in the human genome. We want to know the full set of parts from which we are made, and to discover how they work. But even Figure 1–44 Zebrafish as a model for studies of vertebrate development. These small, hardy tropical fish are convenient for genetic studies. Additionally, they have transparent embryos that develop outside of the mother, so that one can clearly observe cells moving and changing their character in the living organism throughout its development. (A) Adult fish. (B) An embryo 24 hours after fertilization. (A, with permission from steve Baskauf; B, from m. Rhinn et al., Neural Dev. 4:12, 2009.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts. As humans, we have a special interest in the human genome. We want to know the full set of parts from which we are made, and to discover how they work. But even Figure 1–44 Zebrafish as a model for studies of vertebrate development. These small, hardy tropical fish are convenient for genetic studies. Additionally, they have transparent embryos that develop outside of the mother, so that one can clearly observe cells moving and changing their character in the living organism throughout its development. (A) Adult fish. (B) An embryo 24 hours after fertilization. (A, with permission from steve Baskauf; B, from m. Rhinn et al., Neural Dev. 4:12, 2009.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts_173
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–45 Times of divergence of different vertebrates. The scale on the left shows the estimated date and geological era of the last common ancestor of each specified pair of animals. each time estimate is based on comparisons of the amino acid sequences of orthologous proteins; the longer the animals of a pair have had to evolve independently, the smaller the percentage of amino acids that remain identical. The time scale has been calibrated to match the fossil evidence showing that the last common ancestor of mammals and birds lived 310 million years ago.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–45 Times of divergence of different vertebrates. The scale on the left shows the estimated date and geological era of the last common ancestor of each specified pair of animals. each time estimate is based on comparisons of the amino acid sequences of orthologous proteins; the longer the animals of a pair have had to evolve independently, the smaller the percentage of amino acids that remain identical. The time scale has been calibrated to match the fossil evidence showing that the last common ancestor of mammals and birds lived 310 million years ago.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_174
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The figures on the right give data on protein—the α chain of hemoglobin. note that although there is a clear general trend of increasing divergence with increasing time for this protein, there are irregularities that are thought to reflect the action of changes of hemoglobin sequence when the organisms experienced special physiological demands. some proteins, subject to stricter functional constraints, evolve much more slowly than hemoglobin, time in millions of years others as much as five times faster. All this gives rise to substantial uncertainties in estimates of divergence times, and some experts believe that the major groups of mammals diverged from one another as if you were a mouse, preoccupied with the molecular biology of mice, humans would be attractive as model genetic organisms, because of one special property: through medical examinations and self-reporting, we catalog our own genetic (and other) disorders. The human population is enormous, consisting today of some 7
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The figures on the right give data on protein—the α chain of hemoglobin. note that although there is a clear general trend of increasing divergence with increasing time for this protein, there are irregularities that are thought to reflect the action of changes of hemoglobin sequence when the organisms experienced special physiological demands. some proteins, subject to stricter functional constraints, evolve much more slowly than hemoglobin, time in millions of years others as much as five times faster. All this gives rise to substantial uncertainties in estimates of divergence times, and some experts believe that the major groups of mammals diverged from one another as if you were a mouse, preoccupied with the molecular biology of mice, humans would be attractive as model genetic organisms, because of one special property: through medical examinations and self-reporting, we catalog our own genetic (and other) disorders. The human population is enormous, consisting today of some 7
Cell_Biology_Alberts_175
Cell_Biology_Alberts
because of one special property: through medical examinations and self-reporting, we catalog our own genetic (and other) disorders. The human population is enormous, consisting today of some 7 billion individuals, and this self-documenting property means that a huge database of information exists on human mutations. The human genome sequence of more than 3 billion nucleotide pairs has been determined for thousands of different people, making it easier than ever before to identify at a molecular level the precise genetic change responsible for any given human mutant phenotype.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. because of one special property: through medical examinations and self-reporting, we catalog our own genetic (and other) disorders. The human population is enormous, consisting today of some 7 billion individuals, and this self-documenting property means that a huge database of information exists on human mutations. The human genome sequence of more than 3 billion nucleotide pairs has been determined for thousands of different people, making it easier than ever before to identify at a molecular level the precise genetic change responsible for any given human mutant phenotype.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_176
Cell_Biology_Alberts
By drawing together the insights from humans, mice, fish, flies, worms, yeasts, plants, and bacteria—using gene sequence similarities to map out the correspondences between one model organism and another—we are enriching our understanding of them all. much as 60 million years more recently than shown here. (Adapted from s. kumar and s.B. hedges, Nature 392:917–920, 1998. With permission from macmillan Publishers ltd.) Figure 1–46 Human and mouse: similar genes and similar development. The human baby and the mouse shown here have similar white patches on their foreheads because both have mutations in the same gene (called Kit), required for the development and maintenance of pigment cells. (courtesy of R.A. Fleischman.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts. By drawing together the insights from humans, mice, fish, flies, worms, yeasts, plants, and bacteria—using gene sequence similarities to map out the correspondences between one model organism and another—we are enriching our understanding of them all. much as 60 million years more recently than shown here. (Adapted from s. kumar and s.B. hedges, Nature 392:917–920, 1998. With permission from macmillan Publishers ltd.) Figure 1–46 Human and mouse: similar genes and similar development. The human baby and the mouse shown here have similar white patches on their foreheads because both have mutations in the same gene (called Kit), required for the development and maintenance of pigment cells. (courtesy of R.A. Fleischman.)
Cell_Biology_Alberts_177
Cell_Biology_Alberts
What precisely do we mean when we speak of the human genome? Whose genome? On average, any two people taken at random differ in about one or two in every 1000 nucleotide pairs in their DNA sequence. The genome of the human species is, properly speaking, a very complex thing, embracing the entire pool of variant genes found in the human population. Knowledge of this variation is helping us to understand, for example, why some people are prone to one disease, others to another; why some respond well to a drug, others badly. It is also providing clues to our history—the population movements and minglings of our ancestors, the infections they suffered, the diets they ate. All these things have left traces in the variant forms of genes that survive today in the human communities that populate the globe. To understand cells and organisms Will Require mathematics, computers, and Quantitative Information
Cell_Biology_Alberts. What precisely do we mean when we speak of the human genome? Whose genome? On average, any two people taken at random differ in about one or two in every 1000 nucleotide pairs in their DNA sequence. The genome of the human species is, properly speaking, a very complex thing, embracing the entire pool of variant genes found in the human population. Knowledge of this variation is helping us to understand, for example, why some people are prone to one disease, others to another; why some respond well to a drug, others badly. It is also providing clues to our history—the population movements and minglings of our ancestors, the infections they suffered, the diets they ate. All these things have left traces in the variant forms of genes that survive today in the human communities that populate the globe. To understand cells and organisms Will Require mathematics, computers, and Quantitative Information
Cell_Biology_Alberts_178
Cell_Biology_Alberts
To understand cells and organisms Will Require mathematics, computers, and Quantitative Information Empowered by knowledge of complete genome sequences, we can list the genes, proteins, and RNA molecules in a cell, and we have methods that allow us to begin to depict the complex web of interactions between them. But how are we to turn all this information into an understanding of how cells work? Even for a single cell type belonging to a single species of organism, the current deluge of data seems overwhelming. The sort of informal reasoning on which biologists usually rely seems totally inadequate in the face of such complexity.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. To understand cells and organisms Will Require mathematics, computers, and Quantitative Information Empowered by knowledge of complete genome sequences, we can list the genes, proteins, and RNA molecules in a cell, and we have methods that allow us to begin to depict the complex web of interactions between them. But how are we to turn all this information into an understanding of how cells work? Even for a single cell type belonging to a single species of organism, the current deluge of data seems overwhelming. The sort of informal reasoning on which biologists usually rely seems totally inadequate in the face of such complexity.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_179
Cell_Biology_Alberts
In fact, the difficulty is more than just a matter of information overload. Biological systems are, for example, full of feedback loops, and the behavior of even the simplest of systems with feedback is remarkably difficult to predict by intuition alone (Figure 1–47); small changes in parameters can cause radical changes in outcome. To go from a circuit diagram to a prediction of the behavior of the system, we need detailed quantitative information, and to draw deductions from that information we need mathematics and computers.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. In fact, the difficulty is more than just a matter of information overload. Biological systems are, for example, full of feedback loops, and the behavior of even the simplest of systems with feedback is remarkably difficult to predict by intuition alone (Figure 1–47); small changes in parameters can cause radical changes in outcome. To go from a circuit diagram to a prediction of the behavior of the system, we need detailed quantitative information, and to draw deductions from that information we need mathematics and computers.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_180
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Such tools for quantitative reasoning are essential, but they are not all-powerful. You might think that, knowing how each protein influences each other protein, and how the expression of each gene is regulated by the products of others, we should soon be able to calculate how the cell as a whole will behave, just as an astronomer can calculate the orbits of the planets, or a chemical engineer can calculate the flows through a chemical plant. But any attempt to perform this feat for anything close to an entire living cell rapidly reveals the limits of our present knowledge. The information we have, plentiful as it is, is full of gaps and uncertainties. Moreover, it is largely qualitative rather than quantitative. Most often, cell biologists studying the cell’s control systems sum up their knowledge in simple schematic diagrams—this book is full of them—rather than in numbers, graphs, and differential equations.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Such tools for quantitative reasoning are essential, but they are not all-powerful. You might think that, knowing how each protein influences each other protein, and how the expression of each gene is regulated by the products of others, we should soon be able to calculate how the cell as a whole will behave, just as an astronomer can calculate the orbits of the planets, or a chemical engineer can calculate the flows through a chemical plant. But any attempt to perform this feat for anything close to an entire living cell rapidly reveals the limits of our present knowledge. The information we have, plentiful as it is, is full of gaps and uncertainties. Moreover, it is largely qualitative rather than quantitative. Most often, cell biologists studying the cell’s control systems sum up their knowledge in simple schematic diagrams—this book is full of them—rather than in numbers, graphs, and differential equations.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_181
Cell_Biology_Alberts
To progress from qualitative descriptions and intuitive reasoning to quantitative descriptions and mathematical deduction is one of the biggest challenges for contemporary cell biology. So far, the challenge has been met only for a few very simple fragments of the machinery of living cells—subsystems involving a handful of different proteins, or two or three cross-regulatory genes, where theory and experiment go closely hand in hand. We discuss some of these examples later in the book and devote the entire final section of Chapter 8 to the role of quantitation in cell biology.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. To progress from qualitative descriptions and intuitive reasoning to quantitative descriptions and mathematical deduction is one of the biggest challenges for contemporary cell biology. So far, the challenge has been met only for a few very simple fragments of the machinery of living cells—subsystems involving a handful of different proteins, or two or three cross-regulatory genes, where theory and experiment go closely hand in hand. We discuss some of these examples later in the book and devote the entire final section of Chapter 8 to the role of quantitation in cell biology.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_182
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Knowledge and understanding bring the power to intervene—with humans, to avoid or prevent disease; with plants, to create better crops; with bacteria, to turn them to our own uses. All these biological enterprises are linked, because the genetic information of all living organisms is written in the same language. The new-found ability of molecular biologists to read and decipher this language has already begun to transform our relationship to the living world. The account of cell biology in the subsequent chapters will, we hope, equip the reader to understand, and possibly to contribute to, the great scientific adventure of the twenty-first century.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Knowledge and understanding bring the power to intervene—with humans, to avoid or prevent disease; with plants, to create better crops; with bacteria, to turn them to our own uses. All these biological enterprises are linked, because the genetic information of all living organisms is written in the same language. The new-found ability of molecular biologists to read and decipher this language has already begun to transform our relationship to the living world. The account of cell biology in the subsequent chapters will, we hope, equip the reader to understand, and possibly to contribute to, the great scientific adventure of the twenty-first century.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_183
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure 1–47 A very simple regulatory circuit—a single gene regulating its own expression by the binding of its protein product to its own regulatory DNA. simple schematic diagrams such as this are found throughout this book. They are often used to summarize what we know, but they leave many questions unanswered. When the protein binds, does it inhibit or stimulate transcription from the gene? how steeply does the transcription rate depend on the protein concentration? how long, on average, does a molecule of the protein remain bound to the dnA? how long does it take to make each molecule of mRnA or protein, and how quickly does each type of molecule get degraded? As explained in chapter 8, mathematical modeling shows that we need quantitative answers to all these and other questions before we can predict the behavior of even this single-gene system. For different parameter values, the system may settle to a unique steady state; or it may behave as a switch, capable of existing in one
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure 1–47 A very simple regulatory circuit—a single gene regulating its own expression by the binding of its protein product to its own regulatory DNA. simple schematic diagrams such as this are found throughout this book. They are often used to summarize what we know, but they leave many questions unanswered. When the protein binds, does it inhibit or stimulate transcription from the gene? how steeply does the transcription rate depend on the protein concentration? how long, on average, does a molecule of the protein remain bound to the dnA? how long does it take to make each molecule of mRnA or protein, and how quickly does each type of molecule get degraded? As explained in chapter 8, mathematical modeling shows that we need quantitative answers to all these and other questions before we can predict the behavior of even this single-gene system. For different parameter values, the system may settle to a unique steady state; or it may behave as a switch, capable of existing in one
Cell_Biology_Alberts_184
Cell_Biology_Alberts
we can predict the behavior of even this single-gene system. For different parameter values, the system may settle to a unique steady state; or it may behave as a switch, capable of existing in one or another of a set of alternative states; or it may oscillate; or it may show large random fluctuations.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. we can predict the behavior of even this single-gene system. For different parameter values, the system may settle to a unique steady state; or it may behave as a switch, capable of existing in one or another of a set of alternative states; or it may oscillate; or it may show large random fluctuations.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_185
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Eukaryotic cells, by definition, keep their DNA in a separate membrane-enclosed compartment, the nucleus. They have, in addition, a cytoskeleton for support and movement, elaborate intracellular compartments for digestion and secretion, the capacity (in many species) to engulf other cells, and a metabolism that depends on the oxidation of organic molecules by mitochondria. These properties suggest that eukaryotes may have originated as predators on other cells. Mitochondria—and, in plants, chloroplasts—contain their own genetic material, and they evidently evolved from bacteria that were taken up into the cytoplasm of ancient cells and survived as symbionts.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Eukaryotic cells, by definition, keep their DNA in a separate membrane-enclosed compartment, the nucleus. They have, in addition, a cytoskeleton for support and movement, elaborate intracellular compartments for digestion and secretion, the capacity (in many species) to engulf other cells, and a metabolism that depends on the oxidation of organic molecules by mitochondria. These properties suggest that eukaryotes may have originated as predators on other cells. Mitochondria—and, in plants, chloroplasts—contain their own genetic material, and they evidently evolved from bacteria that were taken up into the cytoplasm of ancient cells and survived as symbionts.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_186
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Eukaryotic cells typically have 3–30 times as many genes as prokaryotes, and often thousands of times more noncoding DNA. The noncoding DNA allows for great complexity in the regulation of gene expression, as required for the construction of complex multicellular organisms. Many eukaryotes are, however, unicellular—among them the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which serves as a simple model organism for eukaryotic cell biology, revealing the molecular basis of many fundamental processes that have been strikingly conserved during a billion years of evolution. A small number of other organisms have also been chosen for intensive study: a worm, a fly, a fish, and the mouse serve as “model organisms” for multicellular animals; and a small milkweed serves as a model for plants.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Eukaryotic cells typically have 3–30 times as many genes as prokaryotes, and often thousands of times more noncoding DNA. The noncoding DNA allows for great complexity in the regulation of gene expression, as required for the construction of complex multicellular organisms. Many eukaryotes are, however, unicellular—among them the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which serves as a simple model organism for eukaryotic cell biology, revealing the molecular basis of many fundamental processes that have been strikingly conserved during a billion years of evolution. A small number of other organisms have also been chosen for intensive study: a worm, a fly, a fish, and the mouse serve as “model organisms” for multicellular animals; and a small milkweed serves as a model for plants.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_187
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Powerful new technologies such as genome sequencing are producing striking advances in our knowledge of human beings, and they are helping to advance our understanding of human health and disease. But living systems are incredibly complex, and mammalian genomes contain multiple closely related homologs of most genes. This genetic redundancy has allowed diversification and specialization of genes for new purposes, but it also makes biological mechanisms harder to decipher. For this reason, simpler model organisms have played a key part in revealing universal genetic mechanisms of animal development, and research using these systems remains critical for driving scientific and medical advances. Which statements are true? explain why or why not.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Powerful new technologies such as genome sequencing are producing striking advances in our knowledge of human beings, and they are helping to advance our understanding of human health and disease. But living systems are incredibly complex, and mammalian genomes contain multiple closely related homologs of most genes. This genetic redundancy has allowed diversification and specialization of genes for new purposes, but it also makes biological mechanisms harder to decipher. For this reason, simpler model organisms have played a key part in revealing universal genetic mechanisms of animal development, and research using these systems remains critical for driving scientific and medical advances. Which statements are true? explain why or why not.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_188
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Which statements are true? explain why or why not. What new approaches might provide a clearer view of the anaerobic archaeon that is thought to have formed the nucleus of the first eukaryotic cell? how did its symbiosis with an aerobic bacterium lead to the mitochondrion? somewhere on earth, are there cells not yet identified that can fill in the details of how eukaryotic cells originated? dnA sequencing has revealed a rich and previously undiscovered world of microbial cells, the vast majority of which fail to grow in a laboratory. how might these cells be made more accessible for detailed study? What new model cells or organisms should be developed for scientists to study? Why might a concerted focus on these models speed progress toward understanding a critical aspect of cell function that is poorly understood? how did the first cell membranes arise?
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Which statements are true? explain why or why not. What new approaches might provide a clearer view of the anaerobic archaeon that is thought to have formed the nucleus of the first eukaryotic cell? how did its symbiosis with an aerobic bacterium lead to the mitochondrion? somewhere on earth, are there cells not yet identified that can fill in the details of how eukaryotic cells originated? dnA sequencing has revealed a rich and previously undiscovered world of microbial cells, the vast majority of which fail to grow in a laboratory. how might these cells be made more accessible for detailed study? What new model cells or organisms should be developed for scientists to study? Why might a concerted focus on these models speed progress toward understanding a critical aspect of cell function that is poorly understood? how did the first cell membranes arise?
Cell_Biology_Alberts_189
Cell_Biology_Alberts
how did the first cell membranes arise? 1–1 Each member of the human hemoglobin gene illustrated in Figure Q1–1. Only one in a million computfamily, which consists of seven genes arranged in two clus-er-generated “random” codes is more error-resistant than ters on different chromosomes, is an ortholog to all of the the natural genetic code. Does the extraordinary mutation other members. resistance of the genetic code argue in favor of its origin as a frozen accident or as a result of natural selection? Explain 1–2 Horizontal gene transfer is more prevalent in sin- your reasoning. gle-celled organisms than in multicellular organisms. 1–3 Most of the DNA sequences in a bacterial genome code for proteins, whereas most of the DNA sequences in the human genome do not. Discuss the following problems.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. how did the first cell membranes arise? 1–1 Each member of the human hemoglobin gene illustrated in Figure Q1–1. Only one in a million computfamily, which consists of seven genes arranged in two clus-er-generated “random” codes is more error-resistant than ters on different chromosomes, is an ortholog to all of the the natural genetic code. Does the extraordinary mutation other members. resistance of the genetic code argue in favor of its origin as a frozen accident or as a result of natural selection? Explain 1–2 Horizontal gene transfer is more prevalent in sin- your reasoning. gle-celled organisms than in multicellular organisms. 1–3 Most of the DNA sequences in a bacterial genome code for proteins, whereas most of the DNA sequences in the human genome do not. Discuss the following problems.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_190
Cell_Biology_Alberts
1–3 Most of the DNA sequences in a bacterial genome code for proteins, whereas most of the DNA sequences in the human genome do not. Discuss the following problems. 1–4 Since it was deciphered four decades ago, some have claimed that the genetic code must be a frozen acci number of codes (thousands) dent, while others have argued that it was shaped by nat susceptibility to mutation ural selection. A striking feature of the genetic code is its inherent resistance to the effects of mutation. For example, Figure Q1–1 susceptibility to mutation of the natural code shown a change in the third position of a codon often specifies the relative to that of millions of computer-generated alternative genetic codes (Problem 1–4). susceptibility measures the average change in same amino acid or one with similar chemical properties. amino acid properties caused by random mutations in a genetic code. The natural code resists mutation more effectively (is less
Cell_Biology_Alberts. 1–3 Most of the DNA sequences in a bacterial genome code for proteins, whereas most of the DNA sequences in the human genome do not. Discuss the following problems. 1–4 Since it was deciphered four decades ago, some have claimed that the genetic code must be a frozen acci number of codes (thousands) dent, while others have argued that it was shaped by nat susceptibility to mutation ural selection. A striking feature of the genetic code is its inherent resistance to the effects of mutation. For example, Figure Q1–1 susceptibility to mutation of the natural code shown a change in the third position of a codon often specifies the relative to that of millions of computer-generated alternative genetic codes (Problem 1–4). susceptibility measures the average change in same amino acid or one with similar chemical properties. amino acid properties caused by random mutations in a genetic code. The natural code resists mutation more effectively (is less
Cell_Biology_Alberts_191
Cell_Biology_Alberts
amino acid properties caused by random mutations in a genetic code. The natural code resists mutation more effectively (is less A small value indicates that mutations tend to cause minor changes.susceptible to error) than most other possible versions, as (data courtesy of steve Freeland.) 1–5 You have begun to characterize a sample obtained from the depths of the oceans on Europa, one of Jupiter’s moons. Much to your surprise, the sample contains a life-form that grows well in a rich broth. Your preliminary analysis shows that it is cellular and contains DNA, RNA, and protein. When you show your results to a colleague, she suggests that your sample was contaminated with an organism from Earth. What approaches might you try to distinguish between contamination and a novel cellular life-form based on DNA, RNA, and protein?
Cell_Biology_Alberts. amino acid properties caused by random mutations in a genetic code. The natural code resists mutation more effectively (is less A small value indicates that mutations tend to cause minor changes.susceptible to error) than most other possible versions, as (data courtesy of steve Freeland.) 1–5 You have begun to characterize a sample obtained from the depths of the oceans on Europa, one of Jupiter’s moons. Much to your surprise, the sample contains a life-form that grows well in a rich broth. Your preliminary analysis shows that it is cellular and contains DNA, RNA, and protein. When you show your results to a colleague, she suggests that your sample was contaminated with an organism from Earth. What approaches might you try to distinguish between contamination and a novel cellular life-form based on DNA, RNA, and protein?
Cell_Biology_Alberts_192
Cell_Biology_Alberts
1–6 It is not so difficult to imagine what it means to feed on the organic molecules that living things produce. That is, after all, what we do. But what does it mean to “feed” on sunlight, as phototrophs do? Or, even stranger, to “feed” on rocks, as lithotrophs do? Where is the “food,” for example, in the mixture of chemicals (H2S, H2, CO, Mn+, Fe2+, Ni2+, CH4, and NH4+) that spews from a hydrothermal vent? 1–7 How many possible different trees (branching patterns) can in theory be drawn to display the evolution of bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, assuming that they all arose from a common ancestor? 1–8 The genes for ribosomal RNA are highly conserved (relatively few sequence changes) in all organisms on Earth; thus, they have evolved very slowly over time. Were ribosomal RNA genes “born” perfect?
Cell_Biology_Alberts. 1–6 It is not so difficult to imagine what it means to feed on the organic molecules that living things produce. That is, after all, what we do. But what does it mean to “feed” on sunlight, as phototrophs do? Or, even stranger, to “feed” on rocks, as lithotrophs do? Where is the “food,” for example, in the mixture of chemicals (H2S, H2, CO, Mn+, Fe2+, Ni2+, CH4, and NH4+) that spews from a hydrothermal vent? 1–7 How many possible different trees (branching patterns) can in theory be drawn to display the evolution of bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, assuming that they all arose from a common ancestor? 1–8 The genes for ribosomal RNA are highly conserved (relatively few sequence changes) in all organisms on Earth; thus, they have evolved very slowly over time. Were ribosomal RNA genes “born” perfect?
Cell_Biology_Alberts_193
Cell_Biology_Alberts
1–9 Genes participating in informational processes such as replication, transcription, and translation are transferred between species much less often than are genes involved in metabolism. The basis for this inequality is unclear at present, but one suggestion is that it relates to the underlying complexity of the two types of processes. Informational processes tend to involve large aggregates of different gene products, whereas metabolic reactions are usually catalyzed by enzymes composed of a single protein. Why would the complexity of the underlying process—informational or metabolic—have any effect on the rate of horizontal gene transfer?
Cell_Biology_Alberts. 1–9 Genes participating in informational processes such as replication, transcription, and translation are transferred between species much less often than are genes involved in metabolism. The basis for this inequality is unclear at present, but one suggestion is that it relates to the underlying complexity of the two types of processes. Informational processes tend to involve large aggregates of different gene products, whereas metabolic reactions are usually catalyzed by enzymes composed of a single protein. Why would the complexity of the underlying process—informational or metabolic—have any effect on the rate of horizontal gene transfer?
Cell_Biology_Alberts_194
Cell_Biology_Alberts
1–10 Animal cells have neither cell walls nor chloroplasts, whereas plant cells have both. Fungal cells are somewhere in between; they have cell walls but lack chloroplasts. Are fungal cells more likely to be animal cells that gained the ability to make cell walls, or plant cells that lost their chloroplasts? This question represented a difficult issue for early investigators who sought to assign evolutionary relationships based solely on cell characteristics and morphology. How do you suppose that this question was eventually decided?
Cell_Biology_Alberts. 1–10 Animal cells have neither cell walls nor chloroplasts, whereas plant cells have both. Fungal cells are somewhere in between; they have cell walls but lack chloroplasts. Are fungal cells more likely to be animal cells that gained the ability to make cell walls, or plant cells that lost their chloroplasts? This question represented a difficult issue for early investigators who sought to assign evolutionary relationships based solely on cell characteristics and morphology. How do you suppose that this question was eventually decided?
Cell_Biology_Alberts_195
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Figure Q1–2 Phylogenetic tree for hemoglobin genes from a variety of species (Problem 1–11). The legumes are highlighted in green. The lengths of lines that connect the present-day species represent the evolutionary distances that separate them. Barley ChlamydomonasParameciumNematode Clam Insect Earthworm Goldfsh Frog Salamander Cobra Chicken Rabbit Whale Cat Human Cow LotusAlfalfaBeanVERTEBRATES INVERTEBRATES PROTOZOA PLANTS 1–11 When plant hemoglobin genes were first discovered in legumes, it was so surprising to find a gene typical of animal blood that it was hypothesized that the plant gene arose by horizontal transfer from an animal. Many more hemoglobin genes have now been sequenced, and a phylogenetic tree based on some of these sequences is shown in Figure Q1–2. A. Does this tree support or refute the hypothesis that the plant hemoglobins arose by horizontal gene transfer?
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Figure Q1–2 Phylogenetic tree for hemoglobin genes from a variety of species (Problem 1–11). The legumes are highlighted in green. The lengths of lines that connect the present-day species represent the evolutionary distances that separate them. Barley ChlamydomonasParameciumNematode Clam Insect Earthworm Goldfsh Frog Salamander Cobra Chicken Rabbit Whale Cat Human Cow LotusAlfalfaBeanVERTEBRATES INVERTEBRATES PROTOZOA PLANTS 1–11 When plant hemoglobin genes were first discovered in legumes, it was so surprising to find a gene typical of animal blood that it was hypothesized that the plant gene arose by horizontal transfer from an animal. Many more hemoglobin genes have now been sequenced, and a phylogenetic tree based on some of these sequences is shown in Figure Q1–2. A. Does this tree support or refute the hypothesis that the plant hemoglobins arose by horizontal gene transfer?
Cell_Biology_Alberts_196
Cell_Biology_Alberts
A. Does this tree support or refute the hypothesis that the plant hemoglobins arose by horizontal gene transfer? b. Supposing that the plant hemoglobin genes were originally derived from a parasitic nematode, for example, what would you expect the phylogenetic tree to look like? 1–12 Rates of evolution appear to vary in different lineages. For example, the rate of evolution in the rat lineage is significantly higher than in the human lineage. These rate differences are apparent whether one looks at changes in nucleotide sequences that encode proteins and are subject to selective pressure or at changes in noncoding nucleotide sequences, which are not under obvious selection pressure. Can you offer one or more possible explanations for the slower rate of evolutionary change in the human lineage versus the rat lineage? Alberts B, Bray d, hopkin k et al. (2014) essential cell Biology, 4th ed. new york: Garland science.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. A. Does this tree support or refute the hypothesis that the plant hemoglobins arose by horizontal gene transfer? b. Supposing that the plant hemoglobin genes were originally derived from a parasitic nematode, for example, what would you expect the phylogenetic tree to look like? 1–12 Rates of evolution appear to vary in different lineages. For example, the rate of evolution in the rat lineage is significantly higher than in the human lineage. These rate differences are apparent whether one looks at changes in nucleotide sequences that encode proteins and are subject to selective pressure or at changes in noncoding nucleotide sequences, which are not under obvious selection pressure. Can you offer one or more possible explanations for the slower rate of evolutionary change in the human lineage versus the rat lineage? Alberts B, Bray d, hopkin k et al. (2014) essential cell Biology, 4th ed. new york: Garland science.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_197
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Alberts B, Bray d, hopkin k et al. (2014) essential cell Biology, 4th ed. new york: Garland science. Barton nh, Briggs deG, eisen JA et al. (2007) evolution. cold spring harbor, ny: cold spring harbor laboratory Press. darwin c (1859) on the origin of species. london: murray. Graur d & li W-h (1999) Fundamentals of molecular evolution, 2nd ed. sunderland, mA: sinauer Associates. madigan mT, martinko Jm, stahl d et al. (2010) Brock Biology of microorganisms, 13th ed. menlo Park, cA: Benjamin-cummings. margulis l & chapman mJ (2009) kingdoms and domains: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of life on earth, 1st ed. san diego: Academic Press. moore JA (1993) science As a Way of knowing. cambridge, mA: harvard university Press. moore JA (1972) heredity and development, 2nd ed. new york: oxford university Press. (Free download at www.nap.edu) yang Z (2014) molecular evolution: A statistical Approach. oxford: oxford university Press. The Universal Features of Cells On earth
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Alberts B, Bray d, hopkin k et al. (2014) essential cell Biology, 4th ed. new york: Garland science. Barton nh, Briggs deG, eisen JA et al. (2007) evolution. cold spring harbor, ny: cold spring harbor laboratory Press. darwin c (1859) on the origin of species. london: murray. Graur d & li W-h (1999) Fundamentals of molecular evolution, 2nd ed. sunderland, mA: sinauer Associates. madigan mT, martinko Jm, stahl d et al. (2010) Brock Biology of microorganisms, 13th ed. menlo Park, cA: Benjamin-cummings. margulis l & chapman mJ (2009) kingdoms and domains: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of life on earth, 1st ed. san diego: Academic Press. moore JA (1993) science As a Way of knowing. cambridge, mA: harvard university Press. moore JA (1972) heredity and development, 2nd ed. new york: oxford university Press. (Free download at www.nap.edu) yang Z (2014) molecular evolution: A statistical Approach. oxford: oxford university Press. The Universal Features of Cells On earth
Cell_Biology_Alberts_198
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The Universal Features of Cells On earth Andersson sGe (2006) The bacterial world gets smaller. Science 314, 259–260. Brenner s, Jacob F & meselson m (1961) An unstable intermediate carrying information from genes to ribosomes for protein synthesis. Nature 190, 576–581. deamer d & szostak JW eds. (2010) The origins of life (cold spring harbor Perspectives in Biology). ny: cold spring harbor laboratory Press. Gibson dG, Benders GA, Andrews-Pfannkoch c et al. (2008) complete chemical synthesis, assembly, and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Science 319, 1215–1220. Glass JI, Assad-Garcia n, Alperovich n et al. (2006) essential genes of a minimal bacterium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 425–430. harris Jk, kelley sT, spiegelman GB et al. (2003) The genetic core of the universal ancestor. Genome Res. 13, 407–413. koonin ev (2005) orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 309–338.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The Universal Features of Cells On earth Andersson sGe (2006) The bacterial world gets smaller. Science 314, 259–260. Brenner s, Jacob F & meselson m (1961) An unstable intermediate carrying information from genes to ribosomes for protein synthesis. Nature 190, 576–581. deamer d & szostak JW eds. (2010) The origins of life (cold spring harbor Perspectives in Biology). ny: cold spring harbor laboratory Press. Gibson dG, Benders GA, Andrews-Pfannkoch c et al. (2008) complete chemical synthesis, assembly, and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Science 319, 1215–1220. Glass JI, Assad-Garcia n, Alperovich n et al. (2006) essential genes of a minimal bacterium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 425–430. harris Jk, kelley sT, spiegelman GB et al. (2003) The genetic core of the universal ancestor. Genome Res. 13, 407–413. koonin ev (2005) orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 309–338.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_199
Cell_Biology_Alberts
koonin ev (2005) orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 309–338. noller h (2005) RnA structure: reading the ribosome. Science 309, 1508–1514. Rinke c, schwientek P, sczyrba A et al. (2013) Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499, 431–437. Watson Jd & crick Fhc (1953) molecular structure of nucleic acids. A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737–738. The Diversity of Genomes and the Tree of Life Blattner FR, Plunkett G, Bloch cA et al. (1997) The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli k-12. Science 277, 1453–1474. Boucher y, douady cJ, Papke RT et al. (2003) lateral gene transfer and the origins of prokaryotic groups. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37, 283–328. cavicchioli R (2010) Archaea–timeline of the third domain. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 51–61.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. koonin ev (2005) orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 309–338. noller h (2005) RnA structure: reading the ribosome. Science 309, 1508–1514. Rinke c, schwientek P, sczyrba A et al. (2013) Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499, 431–437. Watson Jd & crick Fhc (1953) molecular structure of nucleic acids. A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737–738. The Diversity of Genomes and the Tree of Life Blattner FR, Plunkett G, Bloch cA et al. (1997) The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli k-12. Science 277, 1453–1474. Boucher y, douady cJ, Papke RT et al. (2003) lateral gene transfer and the origins of prokaryotic groups. Annu. Rev. Genet. 37, 283–328. cavicchioli R (2010) Archaea–timeline of the third domain. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 51–61.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_200
Cell_Biology_Alberts
cavicchioli R (2010) Archaea–timeline of the third domain. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 51–61. choudhuri s (2014) Bioinformatics for Beginners: Genes, Genomes, molecular evolution, databases and Analytical Tools, 1st ed. san diego: Academic Press. dixon B (1997) Power unseen: how microbes Rule the World. oxford:oxford university Press. handelsman J (2004) metagenomics: applications of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68, 669–685. kerr RA (1997) life goes to extremes in the deep earth—and elsewhere? Science 276, 703–704. lee TI, Rinaldi nJ, Robert F et al. (2002) Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 298, 799–804. olsen GJ & Woese cR (1997) Archaeal genomics: an overview. Cell 89:991–994. Williams TA, Foster PG, cox cJ & embley Tm (2013) An archaeal origin of eukaryotes supports only two primary domains of life. Nature 504, 231–235. Woese c (1998) The universal ancestor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6854–6859.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. cavicchioli R (2010) Archaea–timeline of the third domain. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 51–61. choudhuri s (2014) Bioinformatics for Beginners: Genes, Genomes, molecular evolution, databases and Analytical Tools, 1st ed. san diego: Academic Press. dixon B (1997) Power unseen: how microbes Rule the World. oxford:oxford university Press. handelsman J (2004) metagenomics: applications of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68, 669–685. kerr RA (1997) life goes to extremes in the deep earth—and elsewhere? Science 276, 703–704. lee TI, Rinaldi nJ, Robert F et al. (2002) Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 298, 799–804. olsen GJ & Woese cR (1997) Archaeal genomics: an overview. Cell 89:991–994. Williams TA, Foster PG, cox cJ & embley Tm (2013) An archaeal origin of eukaryotes supports only two primary domains of life. Nature 504, 231–235. Woese c (1998) The universal ancestor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6854–6859.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_201
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Woese c (1998) The universal ancestor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6854–6859. Adams md, celniker se, holt RA et al. (2000) The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287, 2185–2195. Amborella Genome Project (2013) The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 342, 1241089. Andersson sG, Zomorodipour A, Andersson Jo et al. (1998) The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria. Nature 396, 133–140. The Arabidopsis Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815. carroll sB, Grenier Jk & Weatherbee sd (2005) From dnA to diversity: molecular Genetics and the evolution of Animal design, 2nd ed. maldon, mA: Blackwell science. de duve c (2007) The origin of eukaryotes: a reappraisal. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 395–403. delsuc F, Brinkmann h & Philippe h (2005) Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 361–375.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Woese c (1998) The universal ancestor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6854–6859. Adams md, celniker se, holt RA et al. (2000) The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287, 2185–2195. Amborella Genome Project (2013) The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 342, 1241089. Andersson sG, Zomorodipour A, Andersson Jo et al. (1998) The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria. Nature 396, 133–140. The Arabidopsis Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815. carroll sB, Grenier Jk & Weatherbee sd (2005) From dnA to diversity: molecular Genetics and the evolution of Animal design, 2nd ed. maldon, mA: Blackwell science. de duve c (2007) The origin of eukaryotes: a reappraisal. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 395–403. delsuc F, Brinkmann h & Philippe h (2005) Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 361–375.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_202
Cell_Biology_Alberts
delsuc F, Brinkmann h & Philippe h (2005) Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 361–375. deRisi Jl, Iyer vR & Brown Po (1997) exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278, 680–686. Gabriel sB, schaffner sF, nguyen h et al. (2002) The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 296, 2225–2229. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey h et al. (1996) life with 6000 genes. Science 274, 546–567. International human Genome sequencing consortium (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921. keeling PJ & koonin ev eds. (2014) The origin and evolution of eukaryotes (cold spring harbor Perspectives in Biology). ny: cold spring harbor laboratory Press. lander es (2011) Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome. Nature 470, 187–197. lynch m & conery Js (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151–1155.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. delsuc F, Brinkmann h & Philippe h (2005) Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 361–375. deRisi Jl, Iyer vR & Brown Po (1997) exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278, 680–686. Gabriel sB, schaffner sF, nguyen h et al. (2002) The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 296, 2225–2229. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey h et al. (1996) life with 6000 genes. Science 274, 546–567. International human Genome sequencing consortium (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921. keeling PJ & koonin ev eds. (2014) The origin and evolution of eukaryotes (cold spring harbor Perspectives in Biology). ny: cold spring harbor laboratory Press. lander es (2011) Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome. Nature 470, 187–197. lynch m & conery Js (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151–1155.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_203
Cell_Biology_Alberts
lynch m & conery Js (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151–1155. national center for Biotechnology Information. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ owens k & king mc (1999) Genomic views of human history. Science 286, 451–453. Palmer Jd & delwiche cF (1996) second-hand chloroplasts and the case of the disappearing nucleus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 7432–7435. Reed FA & Tishkoff sA (2006) African human diversity, origins and migrations. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 597–605. Rine J (2014) A future of the model organism model. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 549–553. Rubin Gm, yandell md, Wortman JR et al. (2000) comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science 287, 2204–2215. shen y, yue F, mccleary d et al. (2012) A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488, 116–120. The C. elegans sequencing consortium (1998) Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 282, 2012–2018.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. lynch m & conery Js (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151–1155. national center for Biotechnology Information. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ owens k & king mc (1999) Genomic views of human history. Science 286, 451–453. Palmer Jd & delwiche cF (1996) second-hand chloroplasts and the case of the disappearing nucleus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 7432–7435. Reed FA & Tishkoff sA (2006) African human diversity, origins and migrations. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 597–605. Rine J (2014) A future of the model organism model. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 549–553. Rubin Gm, yandell md, Wortman JR et al. (2000) comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science 287, 2204–2215. shen y, yue F, mccleary d et al. (2012) A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488, 116–120. The C. elegans sequencing consortium (1998) Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 282, 2012–2018.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_204
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The C. elegans sequencing consortium (1998) Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 282, 2012–2018. Tinsley Rc & kobel hR eds. (1996) The Biology of Xenopus. oxford: clarendon Press. Tyson JJ, chen kc & novak B (2003) sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 221–231. venter Jc, Adams md, myers eW et al (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304–1351. It is at first sight difficult to accept the idea that living creatures are merely chemical systems. Their incredible diversity of form, their seemingly purposeful behavior, and their ability to grow and reproduce all seem to set them apart from the world of solids, liquids, and gases that chemistry normally describes. Indeed, until the nineteenth century animals were believed to contain a Vital Force—an “animus”—that was responsible for their distinctive properties.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The C. elegans sequencing consortium (1998) Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 282, 2012–2018. Tinsley Rc & kobel hR eds. (1996) The Biology of Xenopus. oxford: clarendon Press. Tyson JJ, chen kc & novak B (2003) sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 221–231. venter Jc, Adams md, myers eW et al (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304–1351. It is at first sight difficult to accept the idea that living creatures are merely chemical systems. Their incredible diversity of form, their seemingly purposeful behavior, and their ability to grow and reproduce all seem to set them apart from the world of solids, liquids, and gases that chemistry normally describes. Indeed, until the nineteenth century animals were believed to contain a Vital Force—an “animus”—that was responsible for their distinctive properties.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_205
Cell_Biology_Alberts
We now know that there is nothing in living organisms that disobeys chemical or physical laws. However, the chemistry of life is indeed special. First, it is based overwhelmingly on carbon compounds, the study of which is known as organic chemistry. Second, cells are 70% water, and life depends largely on chemical reactions that take place in aqueous solution. Third, and most important, cell chemistry is enormously complex: even the simplest cell is vastly more complicated in its chemistry than any other chemical system known. In particular, although cells contain a variety of small carbon-containing molecules, most of the carbon atoms present are incorporated into enormous polymeric molecules—chains of chemical subunits linked end-to-end. It is the unique properties of these macromolecules that enable cells and organisms to grow and reproduce—as well as to do all the other things that are characteristic of life. The ChemiCal ComponenTs of a Cell
Cell_Biology_Alberts. We now know that there is nothing in living organisms that disobeys chemical or physical laws. However, the chemistry of life is indeed special. First, it is based overwhelmingly on carbon compounds, the study of which is known as organic chemistry. Second, cells are 70% water, and life depends largely on chemical reactions that take place in aqueous solution. Third, and most important, cell chemistry is enormously complex: even the simplest cell is vastly more complicated in its chemistry than any other chemical system known. In particular, although cells contain a variety of small carbon-containing molecules, most of the carbon atoms present are incorporated into enormous polymeric molecules—chains of chemical subunits linked end-to-end. It is the unique properties of these macromolecules that enable cells and organisms to grow and reproduce—as well as to do all the other things that are characteristic of life. The ChemiCal ComponenTs of a Cell
Cell_Biology_Alberts_206
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The ChemiCal ComponenTs of a Cell Living organisms are made of only a small selection of the 92 naturally occurring elements, four of which—carbon (C), hydrogen (H), nitrogen (N), and oxygen (O)—make up 96.5% of an organism’s weight (Figure 2–1). The atoms of these elements are linked together by covalent bonds to form molecules (see Panel 2–1, pp. 90–91). Because covalent bonds are typically 100 times stronger than the thermal energies within a cell, they resist being pulled apart by thermal motions, and they are normally broken only during specific chemical reactions with other atoms and molecules. Two different molecules can be held together by noncovalent bonds, The ChemiCal ComponenTs of a Cell CaTalYsis anD The Use of eneRGY BY Cells
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The ChemiCal ComponenTs of a Cell Living organisms are made of only a small selection of the 92 naturally occurring elements, four of which—carbon (C), hydrogen (H), nitrogen (N), and oxygen (O)—make up 96.5% of an organism’s weight (Figure 2–1). The atoms of these elements are linked together by covalent bonds to form molecules (see Panel 2–1, pp. 90–91). Because covalent bonds are typically 100 times stronger than the thermal energies within a cell, they resist being pulled apart by thermal motions, and they are normally broken only during specific chemical reactions with other atoms and molecules. Two different molecules can be held together by noncovalent bonds, The ChemiCal ComponenTs of a Cell CaTalYsis anD The Use of eneRGY BY Cells
Cell_Biology_Alberts_207
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The ChemiCal ComponenTs of a Cell CaTalYsis anD The Use of eneRGY BY Cells Figure 2–1 The main elements in cells, highlighted in the periodic table. When ordered by their atomic number and arranged in this manner, elements fall into vertical columns that show similar properties. atoms in the same vertical column must gain (or lose) the same number of electrons to attain a filled outer shell, and they thus behave similarly in bond or ion formation. Thus, for example, mg and Ca tend to give away the two electrons in their outer shells. C, n, and o occur in the same horizontal row, and tend to complete their second shells by sharing electrons.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The ChemiCal ComponenTs of a Cell CaTalYsis anD The Use of eneRGY BY Cells Figure 2–1 The main elements in cells, highlighted in the periodic table. When ordered by their atomic number and arranged in this manner, elements fall into vertical columns that show similar properties. atoms in the same vertical column must gain (or lose) the same number of electrons to attain a filled outer shell, and they thus behave similarly in bond or ion formation. Thus, for example, mg and Ca tend to give away the two electrons in their outer shells. C, n, and o occur in the same horizontal row, and tend to complete their second shells by sharing electrons.
Cell_Biology_Alberts_208
Cell_Biology_Alberts
The four elements highlighted in red constitute 99% of the total number of atoms present in the human body. an additional seven elements, highlighted in blue, together represent about 0.9% of the total. The elements shown in green are required in trace amounts by humans. it remains unclear whether those elements shown in yellow are essential in humans. The chemistry of life, it seems, is therefore predominantly the chemistry of lighter elements. The atomic weights shown here are those of the most common isotope of each element. 1000 10,000 kJ which are much weaker (Figure 2–2). We shall see later that noncovalent bonds are important in the many situations where molecules have to associate and dissociate readily to carry out their biological functions. Water is held Together by hydrogen Bonds
Cell_Biology_Alberts. The four elements highlighted in red constitute 99% of the total number of atoms present in the human body. an additional seven elements, highlighted in blue, together represent about 0.9% of the total. The elements shown in green are required in trace amounts by humans. it remains unclear whether those elements shown in yellow are essential in humans. The chemistry of life, it seems, is therefore predominantly the chemistry of lighter elements. The atomic weights shown here are those of the most common isotope of each element. 1000 10,000 kJ which are much weaker (Figure 2–2). We shall see later that noncovalent bonds are important in the many situations where molecules have to associate and dissociate readily to carry out their biological functions. Water is held Together by hydrogen Bonds
Cell_Biology_Alberts_209
Cell_Biology_Alberts
Water is held Together by hydrogen Bonds The reactions inside a cell occur in an aqueous environment. Life on Earth began in the ocean, and the conditions in that primeval environment put a permanent stamp on the chemistry of living things. Life therefore hinges on the chemical properties of water, which are reviewed in Panel 2–2, pp. 92–93.
Cell_Biology_Alberts. Water is held Together by hydrogen Bonds The reactions inside a cell occur in an aqueous environment. Life on Earth began in the ocean, and the conditions in that primeval environment put a permanent stamp on the chemistry of living things. Life therefore hinges on the chemical properties of water, which are reviewed in Panel 2–2, pp. 92–93.