Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset5

like 0

[ "They just shot it down", ">\n\nWell I hope that balloon wasn't inflated with zombie outbreak juice.", ">\n\nIt was over the ocean", ">\n\nZombie sharks are nuttin to fuck wit!", ">\n\nTheir recovery time is not that great to be honest. I'd give a solid hour and 45 minutes and gatorade.", ">\n\nFun fact. During WW2 Japan used balloons to send bombs to the US. One bomb killed 6 people in Oregon.", ">\n\nWeren’t those 6 like all kids? I think a pastor and his wife were taking 5 kids from their church to a beach and the kids found the bomb on the ground.\nEdit: yeah 5 kids and a pregnant woman, fuck imperial Japan", ">\n\nTo be fair, I think we did something similar", ">\n\nWe intentionally bombed Japan yes but we knew what we were hitting. They just released these bombs and they go where they go. For all Japan knew it could have gone into Mexico or another non involved country.", ">\n\nSo they didn’t have any “planned” targets, but we intentionally killed children and blew up schools?\nI’m not rooting for imperial Japan, but its absurd to think that we were a saint in that war. War is bad for everyone.", ">\n\nThey were trying to create wildfires in the West. Now climate change is doing that for them.", ">\n\nCharleston, SC, Myrtle Beach and Wilmington, NC are the three airports.", ">\n\nIt just got shot down.\nIndubitably", ">\n\nSomeone smarter than me: what are the implications/repercussions", ">\n\nChinese weather forecast in shambles", ">\n\nChinese are extremely interested in the weather near Billings Montana and Raleigh NC.", ">\n\nAs is tradition", ">\n\nThey're probably shooting that thing down once it gets over the ocean.", ">\n\nIn regards to the 2nd balloon over Latin America; did that balloon \"blow off course\" too?", ">\n\nThe trash from the Tsunami that hit Japan got carried up and down the coast of North and South America.", ">\n\nAs someone on one of those coasts, may I see a source?", ">\n\nNeat, just clicked the link and saw it popped like 30 seconds later.", ">\n\nI’ve been sitting a plane that was grounded for this meant to go Charlotte to Myrtle beach at 1pm EST for 3 hours now.\nWe are finally going to take off now.", ">\n\nNo one tell China they can just use google maps.", ">\n\nI doubt it had cameras. It was probably being used for signals intelligence.", ">\n\nSo what's going to happen to the boy who was flying in the balloon?", ">\n\nBalloon just got shot down", ">\n\nI wonder what China would do if we flew a spy balloon over their country…", ">\n\nProbably what we did. Chase it with a series of signals intelligence aircraft (in the USAF's case, a series of R-135U Combat Sent) , recording every bit and packet it transmitted for further analysis of encryption protocols and data types, and then when the three letter agencies thought they had what they needed from a live aircraft, puncture a few balloons so they could see what might be gathered from the dead one.", ">\n\nBruh China would have shot that shit down immediately, civilians be fucked.", ">\n\nNo they wouldn’t, because killing soldiers is an act of war.", ">\n\nNo if the US sent a balloon, and shooting down spy planes in the past has not started any wars.", ">\n\nBecause shooting down spy planes isn’t done.", ">\n\n\n1960\n\nSpycraft has advanced in the past 60 years.", ">\n\nYou’re right that spy planes aren’t really used in the same way anymore (directly flying over countries to take photos). But an active spy plane flown over China or Russia taking photos would be shot down and no war would start.", ">\n\nIn my day James bond would parachute land on it. Take control and stop a doomsday crisis. Yall ain't seen shit yet.", ">\n\nWe're actually going to fly another balloon next to it while Harrison Ford takes a zip line between the two.", ">\n\n“GET OFF OF MY BALLOON. kick”", ">\n\nI don't think they need much more than 1 shot at the balloon to bring it down.", ">\n\nDoes anyone have video of the ballon being shot down? This is the highlight of my boring day and I find it kind of cool this is happening. It’s rare that we civilians get to see this kind of stuff", ">\n\nvideo", ">\n\nThank you dude I appreciate you!", ">\n\nYou know we used to allow Russia/USSR to fly planes over the US as part of a treaty. It's not like all these secret sites haven't already been mapped out. It definitely should be shot down though. Should have done it when it was over Montana where no one is.", ">\n\nthey just shot it down!", ">\n\nBang bang that awful sound.\nBang bang it hit the [water]", ">\n\nWhat are all the white poofs floating down more slowly than the popped balloon?", ">\n\nThey're the thermite charges, obviously", ">\n\nNaw, that there is all the 5G escaping.", ">\n\nWho is starting the go fund me to send a Macys parade sized Winnie the Pooh ballon to Beijing?", ">\n\nFun, it's getting shot down like right next to where I live :/", ">\n\nIs this a rescue of Balloon Boy?", ">\n\nThey wanted to put their 5g in the us so bad.", ">\n\nNot sure I understand why a foreign aircraft is allowed over protected airspace, when it’s not only disrupting airline services, but also that’s it’s a fucking foreign aircraft that has obviously raised more questions than answers.", ">\n\nIt was high enough to not disrupt commercial flights. They've halted flights because they now plan on blowing it up and are afraid the debris could affect planes.\nThe US government considered blowing it up over Montana, but decided not to. I have a feeling the US government understands the nuances of a foreign aircraft in our airspace better than you or I do.", ">\n\nNo no. We know everything!", ">\n\nIt's not a spy balloon, it's a weather balloon that blew off course. It doesn't have much capability as a spy balloon, it can only be controlled to go up and down. China has plenty of satellites to accomplish spying with with much more accuracy and data collection ability. It's a bullshit story to increase tensions with China.", ">\n\nStop the nonsense we surveille every country continously but we give adamn about a balloon WTF", ">\n\nNot in their airspace", ">\n\nLet’s go Grandpa Joe! Unleashed the F22 and let us watch on TV. And fuck you for letting it cross into the US in the first place!", ">\n\nHe told the military to shoot it down when it was over Montana. They advised against it and gave him alternative options.\nFuck him for being well advised and not just swinging his dick around to his hearts content, right?", ">\n\nI think the nuance here is that if they drop it over water they are more likely to have something intact that they can investigate to see what they are up to.", ">\n\nOh man!!! Now what crazy fun thing can they distract us with next? I say more balloons- maybe some colored ones !! Hurray!! Or like giant piñatas! 🪅 ⚪️🤣", ">\n\nSo will the pilots who shot it down get to paint a balloon silhouette with Chinese flag on their planes?", ">\n\nOver reaction much?\nThe media can make a tick seem like godzilla. \nWhy are millions of people so damn scared about everything?\nI guess most really are like Pavlovs dogs.\nThe media blows their whistle and these people freak!", ">\n\nSo... Instead of shooting down the damn thing. The government closes airports thus canceling flights and disrupting travel plans of avarage Americans.\nChina government officials must be laughing at how one balloon managed to cause so much panic for little effort.", ">\n\nThe panic is 98% media driven. The US government opted, on military advice, to not blow it up due to a wide possible debris radius, until it got over water.", ">\n\nYeah because Montana is so populated. They missed their opportunity to do it there because they tried to hide its existence, then when the public saw it, it was too late to take action.", ">\n\nIt's populated enough. \nA lot of people whose job it is to analyze situations like this, because they are good at it, made the decision. Just because some other people, who get paid to be angry about things on TV, told everybody else they should be angry about it, doesn't make the people who made the decision wrong.\nDecisions shouldn't just be made on emotion and whatever people think will play best on TV.", ">\n\nWell whatever data they needed from those locations has already been sent to China sooo…. Poor decision making.", ">\n\nOkay random reddit user, I'm sure you know better than the legion of intelligence and military personnel who decided this was the best option.\nYou're gonna be real concerned when you find out about spy satellites", ">\n\nI already know it’s a thing. I never said I knew more.. I just stated they already have the info.. so shooting it down over the ocean doesn’t do anything for us information or data protection wise. I totally agree not endangering anyone’s lives. But you who are also not government or military personnel knows best! Lol hypocrisy!", ">\n\nMe: The people who made this decision are experts at this.\nYou: It was poor decision making!\nMe: Again, the people who made this decision are experts at this, and you are not. \nYou: Oh and you know best! Hypocrite!\nI never pushed my own personal opinion... You did. Directly against that of the government and military personnel.", ">\n\nIt’s scary that this person can vote", ">\n\nThe other posts he's been making today are about the evils of gay couples being visible in media.", ">\n\nYup, shoot it down once China has all the info they want. Sleepy Joe at his best!", ">\n\nThe military advised Biden to not shoot it down but I’m sure you will ignore this and keep spouting stupidity because you get to “own the libs”.", ">\n\nHey Dummy. Once it entered the US it made sense not to shoot down. Should have shot it down before entering Canada. Be proactive and learn something daily.", ">\n\nHey dummy, maybe the military knows more than you. They got more information from China than China got from us by doing that. Be smart and learn something.", ">\n\nI’m tied into US intelligence and know the facts. Move on.", ">\n\nOh I’m sure you are big boy.", ">\n\nHey man, he works at the CIA.\nI mean, they let him in the lobby to deliver cold grub hub, but that's basically the same thing, right?", ">\n\nSeems only when it effects us" ]

[ "They just shot it down", ">\n\nWell I hope that balloon wasn't inflated with zombie outbreak juice.", ">\n\nIt was over the ocean", ">\n\nZombie sharks are nuttin to fuck wit!", ">\n\nTheir recovery time is not that great to be honest. I'd give a solid hour and 45 minutes and gatorade.", ">\n\nFun fact. During WW2 Japan used balloons to send bombs to the US. One bomb killed 6 people in Oregon.", ">\n\nWeren’t those 6 like all kids? I think a pastor and his wife were taking 5 kids from their church to a beach and the kids found the bomb on the ground.\nEdit: yeah 5 kids and a pregnant woman, fuck imperial Japan", ">\n\nTo be fair, I think we did something similar", ">\n\nWe intentionally bombed Japan yes but we knew what we were hitting. They just released these bombs and they go where they go. For all Japan knew it could have gone into Mexico or another non involved country.", ">\n\nSo they didn’t have any “planned” targets, but we intentionally killed children and blew up schools?\nI’m not rooting for imperial Japan, but its absurd to think that we were a saint in that war. War is bad for everyone.", ">\n\nThey were trying to create wildfires in the West. Now climate change is doing that for them.", ">\n\nCharleston, SC, Myrtle Beach and Wilmington, NC are the three airports.", ">\n\nIt just got shot down.\nIndubitably", ">\n\nSomeone smarter than me: what are the implications/repercussions", ">\n\nChinese weather forecast in shambles", ">\n\nChinese are extremely interested in the weather near Billings Montana and Raleigh NC.", ">\n\nAs is tradition", ">\n\nThey're probably shooting that thing down once it gets over the ocean.", ">\n\nIn regards to the 2nd balloon over Latin America; did that balloon \"blow off course\" too?", ">\n\nThe trash from the Tsunami that hit Japan got carried up and down the coast of North and South America.", ">\n\nAs someone on one of those coasts, may I see a source?", ">\n\nNeat, just clicked the link and saw it popped like 30 seconds later.", ">\n\nI’ve been sitting a plane that was grounded for this meant to go Charlotte to Myrtle beach at 1pm EST for 3 hours now.\nWe are finally going to take off now.", ">\n\nNo one tell China they can just use google maps.", ">\n\nI doubt it had cameras. It was probably being used for signals intelligence.", ">\n\nSo what's going to happen to the boy who was flying in the balloon?", ">\n\nBalloon just got shot down", ">\n\nI wonder what China would do if we flew a spy balloon over their country…", ">\n\nProbably what we did. Chase it with a series of signals intelligence aircraft (in the USAF's case, a series of R-135U Combat Sent) , recording every bit and packet it transmitted for further analysis of encryption protocols and data types, and then when the three letter agencies thought they had what they needed from a live aircraft, puncture a few balloons so they could see what might be gathered from the dead one.", ">\n\nBruh China would have shot that shit down immediately, civilians be fucked.", ">\n\nNo they wouldn’t, because killing soldiers is an act of war.", ">\n\nNo if the US sent a balloon, and shooting down spy planes in the past has not started any wars.", ">\n\nBecause shooting down spy planes isn’t done.", ">\n\n\n1960\n\nSpycraft has advanced in the past 60 years.", ">\n\nYou’re right that spy planes aren’t really used in the same way anymore (directly flying over countries to take photos). But an active spy plane flown over China or Russia taking photos would be shot down and no war would start.", ">\n\nIn my day James bond would parachute land on it. Take control and stop a doomsday crisis. Yall ain't seen shit yet.", ">\n\nWe're actually going to fly another balloon next to it while Harrison Ford takes a zip line between the two.", ">\n\n“GET OFF OF MY BALLOON. kick”", ">\n\nI don't think they need much more than 1 shot at the balloon to bring it down.", ">\n\nDoes anyone have video of the ballon being shot down? This is the highlight of my boring day and I find it kind of cool this is happening. It’s rare that we civilians get to see this kind of stuff", ">\n\nvideo", ">\n\nThank you dude I appreciate you!", ">\n\nYou know we used to allow Russia/USSR to fly planes over the US as part of a treaty. It's not like all these secret sites haven't already been mapped out. It definitely should be shot down though. Should have done it when it was over Montana where no one is.", ">\n\nthey just shot it down!", ">\n\nBang bang that awful sound.\nBang bang it hit the [water]", ">\n\nWhat are all the white poofs floating down more slowly than the popped balloon?", ">\n\nThey're the thermite charges, obviously", ">\n\nNaw, that there is all the 5G escaping.", ">\n\nWho is starting the go fund me to send a Macys parade sized Winnie the Pooh ballon to Beijing?", ">\n\nFun, it's getting shot down like right next to where I live :/", ">\n\nIs this a rescue of Balloon Boy?", ">\n\nThey wanted to put their 5g in the us so bad.", ">\n\nNot sure I understand why a foreign aircraft is allowed over protected airspace, when it’s not only disrupting airline services, but also that’s it’s a fucking foreign aircraft that has obviously raised more questions than answers.", ">\n\nIt was high enough to not disrupt commercial flights. They've halted flights because they now plan on blowing it up and are afraid the debris could affect planes.\nThe US government considered blowing it up over Montana, but decided not to. I have a feeling the US government understands the nuances of a foreign aircraft in our airspace better than you or I do.", ">\n\nNo no. We know everything!", ">\n\nIt's not a spy balloon, it's a weather balloon that blew off course. It doesn't have much capability as a spy balloon, it can only be controlled to go up and down. China has plenty of satellites to accomplish spying with with much more accuracy and data collection ability. It's a bullshit story to increase tensions with China.", ">\n\nStop the nonsense we surveille every country continously but we give adamn about a balloon WTF", ">\n\nNot in their airspace", ">\n\nLet’s go Grandpa Joe! Unleashed the F22 and let us watch on TV. And fuck you for letting it cross into the US in the first place!", ">\n\nHe told the military to shoot it down when it was over Montana. They advised against it and gave him alternative options.\nFuck him for being well advised and not just swinging his dick around to his hearts content, right?", ">\n\nI think the nuance here is that if they drop it over water they are more likely to have something intact that they can investigate to see what they are up to.", ">\n\nOh man!!! Now what crazy fun thing can they distract us with next? I say more balloons- maybe some colored ones !! Hurray!! Or like giant piñatas! 🪅 ⚪️🤣", ">\n\nSo will the pilots who shot it down get to paint a balloon silhouette with Chinese flag on their planes?", ">\n\nOver reaction much?\nThe media can make a tick seem like godzilla. \nWhy are millions of people so damn scared about everything?\nI guess most really are like Pavlovs dogs.\nThe media blows their whistle and these people freak!", ">\n\nSo... Instead of shooting down the damn thing. The government closes airports thus canceling flights and disrupting travel plans of avarage Americans.\nChina government officials must be laughing at how one balloon managed to cause so much panic for little effort.", ">\n\nThe panic is 98% media driven. The US government opted, on military advice, to not blow it up due to a wide possible debris radius, until it got over water.", ">\n\nYeah because Montana is so populated. They missed their opportunity to do it there because they tried to hide its existence, then when the public saw it, it was too late to take action.", ">\n\nIt's populated enough. \nA lot of people whose job it is to analyze situations like this, because they are good at it, made the decision. Just because some other people, who get paid to be angry about things on TV, told everybody else they should be angry about it, doesn't make the people who made the decision wrong.\nDecisions shouldn't just be made on emotion and whatever people think will play best on TV.", ">\n\nWell whatever data they needed from those locations has already been sent to China sooo…. Poor decision making.", ">\n\nOkay random reddit user, I'm sure you know better than the legion of intelligence and military personnel who decided this was the best option.\nYou're gonna be real concerned when you find out about spy satellites", ">\n\nI already know it’s a thing. I never said I knew more.. I just stated they already have the info.. so shooting it down over the ocean doesn’t do anything for us information or data protection wise. I totally agree not endangering anyone’s lives. But you who are also not government or military personnel knows best! Lol hypocrisy!", ">\n\nMe: The people who made this decision are experts at this.\nYou: It was poor decision making!\nMe: Again, the people who made this decision are experts at this, and you are not. \nYou: Oh and you know best! Hypocrite!\nI never pushed my own personal opinion... You did. Directly against that of the government and military personnel.", ">\n\nIt’s scary that this person can vote", ">\n\nThe other posts he's been making today are about the evils of gay couples being visible in media.", ">\n\nYup, shoot it down once China has all the info they want. Sleepy Joe at his best!", ">\n\nThe military advised Biden to not shoot it down but I’m sure you will ignore this and keep spouting stupidity because you get to “own the libs”.", ">\n\nHey Dummy. Once it entered the US it made sense not to shoot down. Should have shot it down before entering Canada. Be proactive and learn something daily.", ">\n\nHey dummy, maybe the military knows more than you. They got more information from China than China got from us by doing that. Be smart and learn something.", ">\n\nI’m tied into US intelligence and know the facts. Move on.", ">\n\nOh I’m sure you are big boy.", ">\n\nHey man, he works at the CIA.\nI mean, they let him in the lobby to deliver cold grub hub, but that's basically the same thing, right?", ">\n\nSeems only when it effects us", ">\n\nSend China the bill for the entire effort." ]

[]

[ "XDA gang 🤜" ]

[ "XDA gang 🤜", ">\n\nYay! 🤜" ]

[ "XDA gang 🤜", ">\n\nYay! 🤜", ">\n\nHow do the keycaps look in person? I’ve been eyeing this set, and they look really good but I thought the font might look weird" ]

[ "XDA gang 🤜", ">\n\nYay! 🤜", ">\n\nHow do the keycaps look in person? I’ve been eyeing this set, and they look really good but I thought the font might look weird", ">\n\nTbh I love how they look in person! I bought other keycaps to see how they fit, like the retro carbon from Akko (OEM), and the originals of the Q1 Keychron (Cherry), and the matcha ones are my fav by far!\nThough, I need to get used to the XDA profile a bit! But I'm loving them. But yea, I also had my doubts about the font, specially in the alt / ctrl ... keys, but they just fit between them pretty good!" ]

[]

[ "Specs: \nKbdfans Kunlun,\nDurock v2 stabs,\nboba u4t,\nrandom aliexpress wob set \nI cant wait to receive my Cerakey Wob set, I think it will look / feel insane !" ]

[ "Specs: \nKbdfans Kunlun,\nDurock v2 stabs,\nboba u4t,\nrandom aliexpress wob set \nI cant wait to receive my Cerakey Wob set, I think it will look / feel insane !", ">\n\nClean" ]

[ "Specs: \nKbdfans Kunlun,\nDurock v2 stabs,\nboba u4t,\nrandom aliexpress wob set \nI cant wait to receive my Cerakey Wob set, I think it will look / feel insane !", ">\n\nClean", ">\n\nThis is super nice" ]

[ "Specs: \nKbdfans Kunlun,\nDurock v2 stabs,\nboba u4t,\nrandom aliexpress wob set \nI cant wait to receive my Cerakey Wob set, I think it will look / feel insane !", ">\n\nClean", ">\n\nThis is super nice", ">\n\nThis board is beautiful, especially with the wrist rest! Wish I could have jumped on the gb at the time." ]

[]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den.", ">\n\nThe cost of 2a is paid everyday in American blood and lives 🇺🇸" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den.", ">\n\nThe cost of 2a is paid everyday in American blood and lives 🇺🇸", ">\n\nRespectfully how do you think getting rid of the second amendment would prevent cartel members from killing people?\nHonestly. \nWhat a low IQ take." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den.", ">\n\nThe cost of 2a is paid everyday in American blood and lives 🇺🇸", ">\n\nRespectfully how do you think getting rid of the second amendment would prevent cartel members from killing people?\nHonestly. \nWhat a low IQ take.", ">\n\nThe ubiquity of firearms in the USA makes any local laws meaningless. The retailers and manufacturers of firearms and ammo are accomplices in every mass shooting. Same way the corn syrup made America fat, 2a has made America like Somalia" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den.", ">\n\nThe cost of 2a is paid everyday in American blood and lives 🇺🇸", ">\n\nRespectfully how do you think getting rid of the second amendment would prevent cartel members from killing people?\nHonestly. \nWhat a low IQ take.", ">\n\nThe ubiquity of firearms in the USA makes any local laws meaningless. The retailers and manufacturers of firearms and ammo are accomplices in every mass shooting. Same way the corn syrup made America fat, 2a has made America like Somalia", ">\n\nA massive chunk guns used for criminal purposes in California are driven across state lines from states with far looser gun laws.\nEDIT: I previously said “a vast majority”. That’s probably wrong, but it’s still a MASSIVE amount of guns used in violent crime that come from outside of the state." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den.", ">\n\nThe cost of 2a is paid everyday in American blood and lives 🇺🇸", ">\n\nRespectfully how do you think getting rid of the second amendment would prevent cartel members from killing people?\nHonestly. \nWhat a low IQ take.", ">\n\nThe ubiquity of firearms in the USA makes any local laws meaningless. The retailers and manufacturers of firearms and ammo are accomplices in every mass shooting. Same way the corn syrup made America fat, 2a has made America like Somalia", ">\n\nA massive chunk guns used for criminal purposes in California are driven across state lines from states with far looser gun laws.\nEDIT: I previously said “a vast majority”. That’s probably wrong, but it’s still a MASSIVE amount of guns used in violent crime that come from outside of the state.", ">\n\nThats just bullshit and you know it.ATF says otherwise.Vast majority of guns used in crime sourced in California.\nTraces for 2020 combines 25K crimes and 15k of those from California.\nDo you want me the post actual data?" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den.", ">\n\nThe cost of 2a is paid everyday in American blood and lives 🇺🇸", ">\n\nRespectfully how do you think getting rid of the second amendment would prevent cartel members from killing people?\nHonestly. \nWhat a low IQ take.", ">\n\nThe ubiquity of firearms in the USA makes any local laws meaningless. The retailers and manufacturers of firearms and ammo are accomplices in every mass shooting. Same way the corn syrup made America fat, 2a has made America like Somalia", ">\n\nA massive chunk guns used for criminal purposes in California are driven across state lines from states with far looser gun laws.\nEDIT: I previously said “a vast majority”. That’s probably wrong, but it’s still a MASSIVE amount of guns used in violent crime that come from outside of the state.", ">\n\nThats just bullshit and you know it.ATF says otherwise.Vast majority of guns used in crime sourced in California.\nTraces for 2020 combines 25K crimes and 15k of those from California.\nDo you want me the post actual data?", ">\n\n“Not all firearms traced are used in crimes and not all firearms used in crimes are traced”.\nEven that being said nearly half of all guns traced come from outside of the state." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den.", ">\n\nThe cost of 2a is paid everyday in American blood and lives 🇺🇸", ">\n\nRespectfully how do you think getting rid of the second amendment would prevent cartel members from killing people?\nHonestly. \nWhat a low IQ take.", ">\n\nThe ubiquity of firearms in the USA makes any local laws meaningless. The retailers and manufacturers of firearms and ammo are accomplices in every mass shooting. Same way the corn syrup made America fat, 2a has made America like Somalia", ">\n\nA massive chunk guns used for criminal purposes in California are driven across state lines from states with far looser gun laws.\nEDIT: I previously said “a vast majority”. That’s probably wrong, but it’s still a MASSIVE amount of guns used in violent crime that come from outside of the state.", ">\n\nThats just bullshit and you know it.ATF says otherwise.Vast majority of guns used in crime sourced in California.\nTraces for 2020 combines 25K crimes and 15k of those from California.\nDo you want me the post actual data?", ">\n\n“Not all firearms traced are used in crimes and not all firearms used in crimes are traced”.\nEven that being said nearly half of all guns traced come from outside of the state.", ">\n\n15k out of 27k..good thing is we can 3D print guns and those belongs to dream states hahahhahahahhahajjahahahahhahahahjahaja..\nPlus these numbers includes people moving in between states.Since time to crime rate is minimum 3 years in California you ll never know if they actually smuggled to firearm or they actually moved with firearm.\nCalifornia average time to crime : 10 years\nHahhahahahhahajahahhahahaha" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den.", ">\n\nThe cost of 2a is paid everyday in American blood and lives 🇺🇸", ">\n\nRespectfully how do you think getting rid of the second amendment would prevent cartel members from killing people?\nHonestly. \nWhat a low IQ take.", ">\n\nThe ubiquity of firearms in the USA makes any local laws meaningless. The retailers and manufacturers of firearms and ammo are accomplices in every mass shooting. Same way the corn syrup made America fat, 2a has made America like Somalia", ">\n\nA massive chunk guns used for criminal purposes in California are driven across state lines from states with far looser gun laws.\nEDIT: I previously said “a vast majority”. That’s probably wrong, but it’s still a MASSIVE amount of guns used in violent crime that come from outside of the state.", ">\n\nThats just bullshit and you know it.ATF says otherwise.Vast majority of guns used in crime sourced in California.\nTraces for 2020 combines 25K crimes and 15k of those from California.\nDo you want me the post actual data?", ">\n\n“Not all firearms traced are used in crimes and not all firearms used in crimes are traced”.\nEven that being said nearly half of all guns traced come from outside of the state.", ">\n\n15k out of 27k..good thing is we can 3D print guns and those belongs to dream states hahahhahahahhahajjahahahahhahahahjahaja..\nPlus these numbers includes people moving in between states.Since time to crime rate is minimum 3 years in California you ll never know if they actually smuggled to firearm or they actually moved with firearm.\nCalifornia average time to crime : 10 years\nHahhahahahhahajahahhahahaha", ">\n\nI edited my original comment because the data you sent suggests that I was incorrect, but it’s still a massive amount. That being said, this comment you just wrote is weird buzzword gibberish." ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den.", ">\n\nThe cost of 2a is paid everyday in American blood and lives 🇺🇸", ">\n\nRespectfully how do you think getting rid of the second amendment would prevent cartel members from killing people?\nHonestly. \nWhat a low IQ take.", ">\n\nThe ubiquity of firearms in the USA makes any local laws meaningless. The retailers and manufacturers of firearms and ammo are accomplices in every mass shooting. Same way the corn syrup made America fat, 2a has made America like Somalia", ">\n\nA massive chunk guns used for criminal purposes in California are driven across state lines from states with far looser gun laws.\nEDIT: I previously said “a vast majority”. That’s probably wrong, but it’s still a MASSIVE amount of guns used in violent crime that come from outside of the state.", ">\n\nThats just bullshit and you know it.ATF says otherwise.Vast majority of guns used in crime sourced in California.\nTraces for 2020 combines 25K crimes and 15k of those from California.\nDo you want me the post actual data?", ">\n\n“Not all firearms traced are used in crimes and not all firearms used in crimes are traced”.\nEven that being said nearly half of all guns traced come from outside of the state.", ">\n\n15k out of 27k..good thing is we can 3D print guns and those belongs to dream states hahahhahahahhahajjahahahahhahahahjahaja..\nPlus these numbers includes people moving in between states.Since time to crime rate is minimum 3 years in California you ll never know if they actually smuggled to firearm or they actually moved with firearm.\nCalifornia average time to crime : 10 years\nHahhahahahhahajahahhahahaha", ">\n\nI edited my original comment because the data you sent suggests that I was incorrect, but it’s still a massive amount. That being said, this comment you just wrote is weird buzzword gibberish.", ">\n\nThank you for that" ]

[ "How do you shoot a baby in the back of the head? I can't believe I just wrote that sentence. I'm done with news for a while.", ">\n\nThe cartels are very violent and depraved individuals.", ">\n\nBut the Latin people don’t need to be saved because they don’t have oil and illegal drugs is good for maintaining the American socioeconomic status quo.", ">\n\nHave you seen the way America “saves” countries? It’s pretty to think that some heroes could roll in and round up the baddies, but what you get is heavy weaponry reigning indiscriminate death down from the sky, and a decade of occupation. The military is a blunt instrument.", ">\n\nThe poor Afghan women able to go to school because of American occupation might have considered themselves “saved” from the Taliban.\nThe military can do more than you give it credit for.", ">\n\nWhy do they keep bringing up cartels. When cartels had nothing to do with it. It was Northern California prison gang members.", ">\n\nThere's a lot of cartels. Trash people, olive oil, sugar, so many more cartels", ">\n\nTrue, but out of all the cartels, there are only a few that do summary executions.", ">\n\nExecutions are about sending a message. The other cartels don't send messages like that.", ">\n\nHey and violence is a huge part of unions history. Strikes became all out battles. People died. The violence is escalated in the drug world, as most involved are a lot more unhinged from reality.", ">\n\nI have no problem reading about violence, but this? Too much, it's a fucking baby.", ">\n\nThere's a simple answer: legalize all drugs. The Cartels would still subsist on human trafficking, guns, etc, but the revenue from those industries wouldn't drive this level of depravity.\nLegalize all drugs, and you turn the cartels in to law abiding, tax paying, road-and-school building Central American Big Pharma.\nWe've been trying the criminal route for over a hundred years now. It's never worked, and has served to only flush trillions down the toilet along with millions of lives. Our police forces have militarized...\nIt's insanity.\nWe can find other means to deal with addiction, as well as admit that the vast majority of drug users are not addicts, and don't behave in a way that requires the criminal justice system to be involved.\nEnd the War on Drugs.", ">\n\nI’m glad you only exist on Reddit and your opinion means nothing in the real world 😀\nLegalize all drugs he says…LMAO", ">\n\nIf you have an argument, provide one. If you don't, you're not adding to the conversation, and you're honestly part of the problem.", ">\n\nNo argument needed to combat such as asinine statement as the one you made.", ">\n\nBuh-bye.", ">\n\nReally? Baby? California needs death penalty for this cruelty.", ">\n\nThe death penalty is not a deterrent nor is it financially effective nor is it perfect in preventing innocent people from occasionally being put to death. Have them rot in a box for the rest of their lives.\nEdit: and legalize all drugs.", ">\n\nIt’s a fitting punishment for someone who shoots a baby in the back of the head. Just kill them. Doesn’t need to deter them, and the cost issue would be solved if we just fixed the process.\nEdit : to the person who deleted their comment about me skipping over killing innocent people, I feel like “fixing the process” covers that. Just because it’s happened doesn’t mean it always has to happen.\nAlso, if an innocent person is being put to death and evidence can’t be gathered to exonerate them, why would they have enough evidence when faced with a different punishment? Sounds like an innocent person “rotting in a cell” for their lives isn’t exactly a favorable outcome either.", ">\n\nThere are no changes that could be made to the criminal justice system that would ensure that 100% of people executed were guilty. There is no way to create a perfect legal system.", ">\n\nI don’t think that’s a good argument against the death penalty honestly.", ">\n\nWe know for a fact that innocent people have been executed. You don't think that is a compelling argument against the death penalty?", ">\n\nNo. I don’t think that “we can never have a perfect system and there will always be a chance,” is a flimsy argument for giving up on the justice system. Hate to play the slippery slope game but, that same argument can be played against life in prison or just prison time in general.\nIf someone can’t get exonerated while going through the endless appeal process that comes with a death sentence, I don’t see how they could get exonerated from life in prison. And in both cases they’re killed by the state, one just makes people feel better because no one is throwing a switch. But leaving them in a cell their whole life is the same thing.", ">\n\nYou can take someone out of prison but you can’t unkill them you complete numbskull", ">\n\nNot if they can’t beat the charge. You can’t unkill an innocent person who spent life in prison either. It’s why the whole “lock them up forever! Its better than killing them because what if they’re innocent!?” argument is lame.\nWell ok, if they’re innocent but can’t beat the charge they’ll die at 80 years old in a cell still an innocent man. If they’re innocent and can beat the charge they can still do so while on death row. It’s not instant you knucklehead.", ">\n\nGreat, I agree, let's abolish life in prison without the possibility of parole too", ">\n\nThe urge for the death penalty is high for me on this one...but if they plead 'Not Guilty', life with no parole must satisfy me...and if they plead 'Guilty', I'm inclined to give them the life with no parole sentence, too.", ">\n\nMany parts of rural CA are desperately poor and have a lot of crime, including cartel activity. There was another mass killing at a grow op in the inland empire a couple of years ago. Just lots of land that’s very sparsely policed. Blaine County in GTA isn’t too far off from reality.", ">\n\nAnyone think cartel style is slang for cartel", ">\n\nYou killed a baby?\nNow that changes things. Now you deserve a slow torturous death. Followed by hunting down and exterminating every last cockroach in your den.", ">\n\nThe cost of 2a is paid everyday in American blood and lives 🇺🇸", ">\n\nRespectfully how do you think getting rid of the second amendment would prevent cartel members from killing people?\nHonestly. \nWhat a low IQ take.", ">\n\nThe ubiquity of firearms in the USA makes any local laws meaningless. The retailers and manufacturers of firearms and ammo are accomplices in every mass shooting. Same way the corn syrup made America fat, 2a has made America like Somalia", ">\n\nA massive chunk guns used for criminal purposes in California are driven across state lines from states with far looser gun laws.\nEDIT: I previously said “a vast majority”. That’s probably wrong, but it’s still a MASSIVE amount of guns used in violent crime that come from outside of the state.", ">\n\nThats just bullshit and you know it.ATF says otherwise.Vast majority of guns used in crime sourced in California.\nTraces for 2020 combines 25K crimes and 15k of those from California.\nDo you want me the post actual data?", ">\n\n“Not all firearms traced are used in crimes and not all firearms used in crimes are traced”.\nEven that being said nearly half of all guns traced come from outside of the state.", ">\n\n15k out of 27k..good thing is we can 3D print guns and those belongs to dream states hahahhahahahhahajjahahahahhahahahjahaja..\nPlus these numbers includes people moving in between states.Since time to crime rate is minimum 3 years in California you ll never know if they actually smuggled to firearm or they actually moved with firearm.\nCalifornia average time to crime : 10 years\nHahhahahahhahajahahhahahaha", ">\n\nI edited my original comment because the data you sent suggests that I was incorrect, but it’s still a massive amount. That being said, this comment you just wrote is weird buzzword gibberish.", ">\n\nThank you for that", ">\n\nThe baby didnt" ]

[]

[ "I bet he’s not even a member!" ]

[ "I bet he’s not even a member!", ">\n\n\"You have to putt around the plane.\"\n-My asshole playing partners." ]

[ "I bet he’s not even a member!", ">\n\n\"You have to putt around the plane.\"\n-My asshole playing partners.", ">\n\nI had to hit it off Frankenstein’s fat foot remember?" ]

[ "I bet he’s not even a member!", ">\n\n\"You have to putt around the plane.\"\n-My asshole playing partners.", ">\n\nI had to hit it off Frankenstein’s fat foot remember?", ">\n\nI mean, if you are a pilot, you know that low-traffic highways, farm fields, and golf courses are your emergency landing targets of choice.\nAny golfer knows you keep anything with wheels off the green. He should have had the decency to stay on the cart path." ]

[ "I bet he’s not even a member!", ">\n\n\"You have to putt around the plane.\"\n-My asshole playing partners.", ">\n\nI had to hit it off Frankenstein’s fat foot remember?", ">\n\nI mean, if you are a pilot, you know that low-traffic highways, farm fields, and golf courses are your emergency landing targets of choice.\nAny golfer knows you keep anything with wheels off the green. He should have had the decency to stay on the cart path.", ">\n\nWhat's the over/under for the pilot being Harrison Ford?" ]

[ "I bet he’s not even a member!", ">\n\n\"You have to putt around the plane.\"\n-My asshole playing partners.", ">\n\nI had to hit it off Frankenstein’s fat foot remember?", ">\n\nI mean, if you are a pilot, you know that low-traffic highways, farm fields, and golf courses are your emergency landing targets of choice.\nAny golfer knows you keep anything with wheels off the green. He should have had the decency to stay on the cart path.", ">\n\nWhat's the over/under for the pilot being Harrison Ford?", ">\n\nNot the birdie they were aiming for." ]

[]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"" ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!" ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him" ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?" ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic.", ">\n\nI'd love for him to make that case. Doing so would crater any future political aspirations." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic.", ">\n\nI'd love for him to make that case. Doing so would crater any future political aspirations.", ">\n\nYou haven’t been paying attention, have you?" ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic.", ">\n\nI'd love for him to make that case. Doing so would crater any future political aspirations.", ">\n\nYou haven’t been paying attention, have you?", ">\n\nMy abridged version: “We could have done something, but it might have been difficult. Now open up your wallet, pleb.”" ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic.", ">\n\nI'd love for him to make that case. Doing so would crater any future political aspirations.", ">\n\nYou haven’t been paying attention, have you?", ">\n\nMy abridged version: “We could have done something, but it might have been difficult. Now open up your wallet, pleb.”", ">\n\nOh, he is. Trust." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic.", ">\n\nI'd love for him to make that case. Doing so would crater any future political aspirations.", ">\n\nYou haven’t been paying attention, have you?", ">\n\nMy abridged version: “We could have done something, but it might have been difficult. Now open up your wallet, pleb.”", ">\n\nOh, he is. Trust.", ">\n\nI may be wrong, but I thought insanity was an affirmative defense that put the burden on the defense, not prosecution, to prove insanity. None of this makes sense and seems like bs." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic.", ">\n\nI'd love for him to make that case. Doing so would crater any future political aspirations.", ">\n\nYou haven’t been paying attention, have you?", ">\n\nMy abridged version: “We could have done something, but it might have been difficult. Now open up your wallet, pleb.”", ">\n\nOh, he is. Trust.", ">\n\nI may be wrong, but I thought insanity was an affirmative defense that put the burden on the defense, not prosecution, to prove insanity. None of this makes sense and seems like bs.", ">\n\nWhat prosecutors? When was he indicted? What have we missed?" ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic.", ">\n\nI'd love for him to make that case. Doing so would crater any future political aspirations.", ">\n\nYou haven’t been paying attention, have you?", ">\n\nMy abridged version: “We could have done something, but it might have been difficult. Now open up your wallet, pleb.”", ">\n\nOh, he is. Trust.", ">\n\nI may be wrong, but I thought insanity was an affirmative defense that put the burden on the defense, not prosecution, to prove insanity. None of this makes sense and seems like bs.", ">\n\nWhat prosecutors? When was he indicted? What have we missed?", ">\n\nNo information here, by design. Enjoy the ads? Me neither." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic.", ">\n\nI'd love for him to make that case. Doing so would crater any future political aspirations.", ">\n\nYou haven’t been paying attention, have you?", ">\n\nMy abridged version: “We could have done something, but it might have been difficult. Now open up your wallet, pleb.”", ">\n\nOh, he is. Trust.", ">\n\nI may be wrong, but I thought insanity was an affirmative defense that put the burden on the defense, not prosecution, to prove insanity. None of this makes sense and seems like bs.", ">\n\nWhat prosecutors? When was he indicted? What have we missed?", ">\n\nNo information here, by design. Enjoy the ads? Me neither.", ">\n\nCowards. The prosecutors were simply cowards." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic.", ">\n\nI'd love for him to make that case. Doing so would crater any future political aspirations.", ">\n\nYou haven’t been paying attention, have you?", ">\n\nMy abridged version: “We could have done something, but it might have been difficult. Now open up your wallet, pleb.”", ">\n\nOh, he is. Trust.", ">\n\nI may be wrong, but I thought insanity was an affirmative defense that put the burden on the defense, not prosecution, to prove insanity. None of this makes sense and seems like bs.", ">\n\nWhat prosecutors? When was he indicted? What have we missed?", ">\n\nNo information here, by design. Enjoy the ads? Me neither.", ">\n\nCowards. The prosecutors were simply cowards.", ">\n\nTrump would not allow his lawyers to use this defense, he is very sensitive about any sort of claim about being mentally deficicient or unintelligent." ]

[ "That is such a bullshit excuse. A defendant proving they are mentally unfit for trial is generally a high bar to pass. Trump is a moron, but he’s not “insane.” They just were too chickenshit to prosecute him.", ">\n\n\"the defendant was impeached twice and not removed by the Senate. Nor was the 25th amendment invoked to remove him. These are a lower bar than this court's\"", ">\n\nOn the contrary, there is no bad to overcome in those cases. The courts have a legal definition of insanity. The 25th and impeachment are 100% political processes. Trump could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and the Senate wouldn’t have to convict if they didn’t feel like it. A court would.", ">\n\nDefense only use it 1% of the cases and only 26% of them are successful. This reeks of bullshit.", ">\n\nThey solved that problem by letting Trump get away with everything.", ">\n\nI always assumed that insanity/diminished capacity as a defense was something the defense had to prove, usually even before any trial and based on expert testimony.\nNor can I see Trump agreeing to an extensive independent psychological evaluation or a defense based on his own insanity or mental incapacity.\nHe clearly appears to be a manipulative narcissist and pathological liar, among other issues, but that doesn't mean he is legally insane and unable to understand reality or distinguish right from wrong.", ">\n\nIt usually is. Why would a prosecutor, who's only job is to find a defendant guilty say yeah, he's legally insane, so we're not gonna win, but we're gonna waste our time during a trial anyway.", ">\n\nI’d prefer an insanity plea actually. \n1) Trump goes away for the rest of his life in a facility worse than prison, forced to take medication and unable to influence the outside world\n2) it makes everyone who voted for him feel stupid and acknowledge that they made a mistake\n3) it still implies that everyone who worked with him is criminally culpable for the events that transpired. Trump’s dumbass would probably see a successful insanity plea as the light at the end of the tunnel and rat on his fellow traitors. One final sendoff from the biggest rat in American history.", ">\n\nHis supporters wouldn’t feel stupid or regret supporting him. There would probably be some\ncombination of these reactions:\n\n\nThis is just more proof of how brilliant Trump is. He played the system once again and used Insanity defense to get out of crimes that he totally didn’t even commit. He made the prosecutors look like stooges. \n\n\nThis is just another example of the backwards world we live in today. The people infected by the woke mind virus are now declaring that the sane people like Trump are the crazy ones. \n\n\nDeep state is coming for us but they had to get Trump out of the way first.", ">\n\nI’m sure, because that portion of his base is also insane. I’m not even being sarcastic here, these people would fit the definition of insanity. The thing is that there is a portion of Trump’s base that are just stupid, not insane, that would eventually learn that maybe they fucked up. Of course this won’t change their habit of voting red, but it’s that sliver of introspection that this country desperately needs right now. Plus the other two points are still true, so I’d still take it. It’s also less likely that his supporters would do shit in retaliation or even try to bust him out of prison.", ">\n\nI've said for years that his best defense would be to be declared incompetent but his ego would never allow it.", ">\n\nThen you've been wrong for years. That's a terrible defense.", ">\n\nSettle down, Nancy Grace. It was just a wry, offhand comment. It will be okay.", ">\n\nLol ok...Michael Avenatti? I don't know, I'm not up on my dated, pop-culture legal snark; fill in your favorite reference. But if you're going to get so upset by replies, maybe a reddit comment section isn't for you.", ">\n\nLike a true NY public servant, Mark Pomerantz wasted no time before writing a gossip book about his less than 2 year stint as a prosecutor.", ">\n\nYou do realize he wanted to prosecute and it was his boss who killed it. He resigned in protest. Take the cynicism elsewhere.", ">\n\nEverything the prosecutor says sounds like, bok bok, bok,bok, bok, b-bok!", ">\n\nSo he’s legally insane, but he wants to be President again.", ">\n\nNo, he's not legally insane. But you can buy a book about how some people discussed the possibility that he might be insane.", ">\n\nLegally insane, commit him", ">\n\nWhy is this headline in the past tense?", ">\n\nClinically insane.", ">\n\nThis is a clickbait article about a book. Not a clinic.", ">\n\nI'd love for him to make that case. Doing so would crater any future political aspirations.", ">\n\nYou haven’t been paying attention, have you?", ">\n\nMy abridged version: “We could have done something, but it might have been difficult. Now open up your wallet, pleb.”", ">\n\nOh, he is. Trust.", ">\n\nI may be wrong, but I thought insanity was an affirmative defense that put the burden on the defense, not prosecution, to prove insanity. None of this makes sense and seems like bs.", ">\n\nWhat prosecutors? When was he indicted? What have we missed?", ">\n\nNo information here, by design. Enjoy the ads? Me neither.", ">\n\nCowards. The prosecutors were simply cowards.", ">\n\nTrump would not allow his lawyers to use this defense, he is very sensitive about any sort of claim about being mentally deficicient or unintelligent.", ">\n\nI guess they needn't have worried. So far, it hasn't come up." ]

[]

[ "The system is rigged against you and your intuition. \n\nYeah, if the majority of what you eat is pre-made (like frozen meals) or treats, but if that’s the case, that’s a big problem on its own. Even then, there is some value in listening to your body.\nThis is kinda weird, though. It’s the first time I hear the term intuitive eating when it comes to adults. I’ve only seen it with regards to toddlers/kids, but I guess some adults do need to re-learn how to eat." ]

[ "The system is rigged against you and your intuition. \n\nYeah, if the majority of what you eat is pre-made (like frozen meals) or treats, but if that’s the case, that’s a big problem on its own. Even then, there is some value in listening to your body.\nThis is kinda weird, though. It’s the first time I hear the term intuitive eating when it comes to adults. I’ve only seen it with regards to toddlers/kids, but I guess some adults do need to re-learn how to eat.", ">\n\nFor obese people, I see \"intuitive eating\" as a goal of total lifestyle transformation.\nOne of the biggest mistakes people make when losing weight is they don't focus on developing a new lifestyle to maintain their losses. Often this involves calorie counting for years to know proper portioning to maintain a healthy weight. While you're doing this you should pay attention to your hunger and satisfaction, and learn to use them in place of calorie counting.\nAfter years of doing this, most people can get to a place where they don't need to count calories and can \"intuitively eat.\"" ]

[ "The system is rigged against you and your intuition. \n\nYeah, if the majority of what you eat is pre-made (like frozen meals) or treats, but if that’s the case, that’s a big problem on its own. Even then, there is some value in listening to your body.\nThis is kinda weird, though. It’s the first time I hear the term intuitive eating when it comes to adults. I’ve only seen it with regards to toddlers/kids, but I guess some adults do need to re-learn how to eat.", ">\n\nFor obese people, I see \"intuitive eating\" as a goal of total lifestyle transformation.\nOne of the biggest mistakes people make when losing weight is they don't focus on developing a new lifestyle to maintain their losses. Often this involves calorie counting for years to know proper portioning to maintain a healthy weight. While you're doing this you should pay attention to your hunger and satisfaction, and learn to use them in place of calorie counting.\nAfter years of doing this, most people can get to a place where they don't need to count calories and can \"intuitively eat.\"", ">\n\nIs it really \"intuitive\" if you spent years measuring, learning the amounts and training said \"intuition\"?" ]

[ "The system is rigged against you and your intuition. \n\nYeah, if the majority of what you eat is pre-made (like frozen meals) or treats, but if that’s the case, that’s a big problem on its own. Even then, there is some value in listening to your body.\nThis is kinda weird, though. It’s the first time I hear the term intuitive eating when it comes to adults. I’ve only seen it with regards to toddlers/kids, but I guess some adults do need to re-learn how to eat.", ">\n\nFor obese people, I see \"intuitive eating\" as a goal of total lifestyle transformation.\nOne of the biggest mistakes people make when losing weight is they don't focus on developing a new lifestyle to maintain their losses. Often this involves calorie counting for years to know proper portioning to maintain a healthy weight. While you're doing this you should pay attention to your hunger and satisfaction, and learn to use them in place of calorie counting.\nAfter years of doing this, most people can get to a place where they don't need to count calories and can \"intuitively eat.\"", ">\n\nIs it really \"intuitive\" if you spent years measuring, learning the amounts and training said \"intuition\"?", ">\n\nKind of I guess. \nI recovered from a binge eating disorder and I’ve been tracking my food and weighing it 90% of the time for the last 2 years. I’ve lost 130 pounds. I’ve become more aware of what a “normal” portion is, when I feel satisfied and stopping rather than feeling stuffed, and learned when I’m feeling actually hungry as opposed to bored hungry. Also I’ve really learned what foods actually were making me feel like shit, and I barely crave them anymore. Do I still have an ice cream occasionally or get pizza? Yeah, but do I get 3 large pizzas and a bucket of ice cream every other day? Lol no\nI see the weighing and tracking as training wheels. I might have to do it for a few more years, I may not. I’ve been slowly letting myself go freeballing about it in more increments. Usually I do this on my off days, or on vacation, and I’ve learned how to not completely sabotage myself while still enjoying myself.\nIt takes time to reformat your brain, especially with food." ]

[ "The system is rigged against you and your intuition. \n\nYeah, if the majority of what you eat is pre-made (like frozen meals) or treats, but if that’s the case, that’s a big problem on its own. Even then, there is some value in listening to your body.\nThis is kinda weird, though. It’s the first time I hear the term intuitive eating when it comes to adults. I’ve only seen it with regards to toddlers/kids, but I guess some adults do need to re-learn how to eat.", ">\n\nFor obese people, I see \"intuitive eating\" as a goal of total lifestyle transformation.\nOne of the biggest mistakes people make when losing weight is they don't focus on developing a new lifestyle to maintain their losses. Often this involves calorie counting for years to know proper portioning to maintain a healthy weight. While you're doing this you should pay attention to your hunger and satisfaction, and learn to use them in place of calorie counting.\nAfter years of doing this, most people can get to a place where they don't need to count calories and can \"intuitively eat.\"", ">\n\nIs it really \"intuitive\" if you spent years measuring, learning the amounts and training said \"intuition\"?", ">\n\nKind of I guess. \nI recovered from a binge eating disorder and I’ve been tracking my food and weighing it 90% of the time for the last 2 years. I’ve lost 130 pounds. I’ve become more aware of what a “normal” portion is, when I feel satisfied and stopping rather than feeling stuffed, and learned when I’m feeling actually hungry as opposed to bored hungry. Also I’ve really learned what foods actually were making me feel like shit, and I barely crave them anymore. Do I still have an ice cream occasionally or get pizza? Yeah, but do I get 3 large pizzas and a bucket of ice cream every other day? Lol no\nI see the weighing and tracking as training wheels. I might have to do it for a few more years, I may not. I’ve been slowly letting myself go freeballing about it in more increments. Usually I do this on my off days, or on vacation, and I’ve learned how to not completely sabotage myself while still enjoying myself.\nIt takes time to reformat your brain, especially with food.", ">\n\nSo this wasn't very intuitive to you" ]