Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset3

like 0

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!", ">\n\nDid he donate 700k from his company to his campaign? \nJail?" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!", ">\n\nDid he donate 700k from his company to his campaign? \nJail?", ">\n\nHow long can McCarthy ignore this scandal without looking like an even bigger fool?" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!", ">\n\nDid he donate 700k from his company to his campaign? \nJail?", ">\n\nHow long can McCarthy ignore this scandal without looking like an even bigger fool?", ">\n\nMcCarthy must be prevented from becoming speaker. If he does, I fear an assassination attempt on Biden and Harris." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!", ">\n\nDid he donate 700k from his company to his campaign? \nJail?", ">\n\nHow long can McCarthy ignore this scandal without looking like an even bigger fool?", ">\n\nMcCarthy must be prevented from becoming speaker. If he does, I fear an assassination attempt on Biden and Harris.", ">\n\nWith the help of proud domestic terrorist Marjorie Taylor Greene." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!", ">\n\nDid he donate 700k from his company to his campaign? \nJail?", ">\n\nHow long can McCarthy ignore this scandal without looking like an even bigger fool?", ">\n\nMcCarthy must be prevented from becoming speaker. If he does, I fear an assassination attempt on Biden and Harris.", ">\n\nWith the help of proud domestic terrorist Marjorie Taylor Greene.", ">\n\nAnd the Secret Service" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!", ">\n\nDid he donate 700k from his company to his campaign? \nJail?", ">\n\nHow long can McCarthy ignore this scandal without looking like an even bigger fool?", ">\n\nMcCarthy must be prevented from becoming speaker. If he does, I fear an assassination attempt on Biden and Harris.", ">\n\nWith the help of proud domestic terrorist Marjorie Taylor Greene.", ">\n\nAnd the Secret Service", ">\n\nSomeone needs to investigate toot sweet whether he’s actually a U.S. citizen." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!", ">\n\nDid he donate 700k from his company to his campaign? \nJail?", ">\n\nHow long can McCarthy ignore this scandal without looking like an even bigger fool?", ">\n\nMcCarthy must be prevented from becoming speaker. If he does, I fear an assassination attempt on Biden and Harris.", ">\n\nWith the help of proud domestic terrorist Marjorie Taylor Greene.", ">\n\nAnd the Secret Service", ">\n\nSomeone needs to investigate toot sweet whether he’s actually a U.S. citizen.", ">\n\nRepublicans aren't going to do anything but let this blow over. The most they'll say is that voters picked him and that all that matters" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!", ">\n\nDid he donate 700k from his company to his campaign? \nJail?", ">\n\nHow long can McCarthy ignore this scandal without looking like an even bigger fool?", ">\n\nMcCarthy must be prevented from becoming speaker. If he does, I fear an assassination attempt on Biden and Harris.", ">\n\nWith the help of proud domestic terrorist Marjorie Taylor Greene.", ">\n\nAnd the Secret Service", ">\n\nSomeone needs to investigate toot sweet whether he’s actually a U.S. citizen.", ">\n\nRepublicans aren't going to do anything but let this blow over. The most they'll say is that voters picked him and that all that matters", ">\n\nHe doesn’t see a traincraish coming from miles away???" ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!", ">\n\nDid he donate 700k from his company to his campaign? \nJail?", ">\n\nHow long can McCarthy ignore this scandal without looking like an even bigger fool?", ">\n\nMcCarthy must be prevented from becoming speaker. If he does, I fear an assassination attempt on Biden and Harris.", ">\n\nWith the help of proud domestic terrorist Marjorie Taylor Greene.", ">\n\nAnd the Secret Service", ">\n\nSomeone needs to investigate toot sweet whether he’s actually a U.S. citizen.", ">\n\nRepublicans aren't going to do anything but let this blow over. The most they'll say is that voters picked him and that all that matters", ">\n\nHe doesn’t see a traincraish coming from miles away???", ">\n\nThe transition to a Republican run House has been waaay more entertaining that I thought it was going to be." ]

[ "Katko’s “Do they defend someone they know has made several material misstatements about his background? Or do they cut him loose with a razor-thin majority?” Katko added, calling it a “no-win situation.” Is emblematic of the problem. \nOf course they should cut him loose. What difference does the thickness of the majority make when you’re talking about morals, ethics and fraud? He defrauded the voters. It’s not a “no win” to do the right thing, unless you’re in Republican circles where the rule seems to be “do whatever it takes to hold onto power”. Screw the voters.", ">\n\nAnything they should do they'll do the opposite.", ">\n\nCalling it now. They let him vote, he votes for McCarthy, McCarthy slow rolls any inquiry and they tell Fox News this is for the voters to sort out in 2024. \nThey are ALL Santos , he just is the one in the spotlight.", ">\n\nwell, if gets indicted and hopefully convicted for the \"monetary discrepencies\" that will likely change things . . .", ">\n\nthey really really need to jump on this now before he is seated otherwise it will be too late.", ">\n\nThis seat should have been an easy win for Democrats - if someone would have done their job in running a campaign correctly, basic opposition research.\nBut then again, I'm in Texas - and the scumbags that do vote far outweigh the idiots that don't...the \"both parties are the same\" is strong, and \"they never do anything for me\", say the people who have never voted nor plan to.", ">\n\nAfter \"grab them by the pussy\" failed to nix a candidate, nothing's a sure bet anymore.", ">\n\nI still SMH about mocking the disabled reporter. These people have no scruples.", ">\n\nTwenty bucks says he ends up on the Ethics committee", ">\n\nhey he might even lead it", ">\n\nIs Santos Jewish or Catholic? Gay, bi, or straight? He admitted he didn’t graduate from college. He doesn’t have the work experience he claimed. He may be a criminal. He might not be a US citizen. He IS a Republican. The conservatives can now shut up about gender.", ">\n\nIs he married, divorced? Seriously this is nuts", ">\n\nDepends. Has his US citizenship gone through?", ">\n\nIs he subject to deportation (or extradition)?", ">\n\nNobody knows with this guy. But he could’ve possibly married a US citizen that is a female in order to gain citizenship.", ">\n\nMarriage fraud is a federal crime.\nObviously it happens all the time, but if it's provable, you're fucked.", ">\n\nAsk Melania Trump how fucked you are if you commit marriage for immigration fraud as a protected Republican stooge.", ">\n\nThey're still married, aren't they?", ">\n\nSomeone with a spine and ounce of integrity: \"Santos is untrustworthy, unethical and not part of the Republican caucus.\"\nKevin McCarthy: silence, then watered down diatribe against media and democrats as directed by freedom caucus.", ">\n\nKevin McCarthy is an invertebrate.", ">\n\nFrom the article: \n\"But one Republican familiar with the discussions said Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term.\" \nMaking a deal with party leaders that if they give him a pass this time, he promises he will step down after one term: they think that he'd be telling the truth NOW? \nCheap delay tactic, knowing the public will forget and also have bigger fish to fry by the time 2024 rolls around. \nHow about a list of all the things Santos has said that ARE true? It would be shorter.", ">\n\nStep aside to run for president…", ">\n\nSantos should hold a press conference with a bunch of empty files and announce he’s throwing away his old life. Works like a charm.", ">\n\nTrump took the empty files and pretended it was his health care plan. Another scheme foiled.", ">\n\nAnd here the Dems kicked out Franken for some false accusations by a Republican operative.", ">\n\nCan contact with a putrid dollop of goo really be called crashing?", ">\n\nr/rareinsults", ">\n\nNot surprising, given the GOP's already slim majority in the House.", ">\n\nwhat difference does it make if they have 222 or 221?", ">\n\nWell, it determines how many defectors on votes the GOP can afford, and for McCarthy in particular, how many votes he can afford to lose in the speakership vote.", ">\n\nThe GOP is so corrupt that every day is a new scandal, a new crime, a new falsehood, something immoral, something dickish, ... It's non-stop wtf. \nAnd that's just the people at the top. Their fanbase is a whole other head scratcher.", ">\n\nButterymales", ">\n\nLaptop", ">\n\n\"Senior GOP strategists are spinning Santos's claim that he can perform 'sick rail grinds' by saying the besieged Republican was misquoted, and that he in fact told reporters he 'believes the American rail industry to be beleaguered with \"grinding\" regulations.\"\n\"Yes, that should do it,\" McCarthy told reporters.", ">\n\n“Can you do one of those grindy thingys on that rail?”", ">\n\nr/UnexpectedScottPilgrim", ">\n\nRepublicans = chaos and confusion", ">\n\nThis is so fun to watch. When the leader of your party is a crook, other crooks wanna join in the fun. It’ll be a joy to watch McCarthy flail about for 2 years.", ">\n\nFuck em both. Lying cheaters thirsty for power. Neither are there for the good of the people.", ">\n\nThere are enough Republicans opposing McCarthy to block his nomination, but I bet that melts by Monday. They're Republicans after all, which means they are incredibly susceptible to bribery", ">\n\nLmao what a shit show of a political party. Fuck all of them, they deserve this and any other fallout from it.", ">\n\nSucks to suck!!", ">\n\nHas a single prominent Republican even condemned Santos for being an outright lying con artist? Any at all? Have any of them called for the blatant fraud to step down from office?", ">\n\nThey bring in only the best, right? Isn’t that what they said?", ">\n\nThe republicans had better not go with mccarthey because the kookoo minority will make their majority regret it every second.", ">\n\n'Santos has told New York party leaders that he won’t seek reelection after this term'\nheck, I believe him!", ">\n\nDid he donate 700k from his company to his campaign? \nJail?", ">\n\nHow long can McCarthy ignore this scandal without looking like an even bigger fool?", ">\n\nMcCarthy must be prevented from becoming speaker. If he does, I fear an assassination attempt on Biden and Harris.", ">\n\nWith the help of proud domestic terrorist Marjorie Taylor Greene.", ">\n\nAnd the Secret Service", ">\n\nSomeone needs to investigate toot sweet whether he’s actually a U.S. citizen.", ">\n\nRepublicans aren't going to do anything but let this blow over. The most they'll say is that voters picked him and that all that matters", ">\n\nHe doesn’t see a traincraish coming from miles away???", ">\n\nThe transition to a Republican run House has been waaay more entertaining that I thought it was going to be.", ">\n\nRepublicans will still have a majority if they cut him loose. But he’s a great campaign target for NY Dems in 2024 if they don’t." ]

[]

[ "Vanilla for life" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland.", ">\n\nBitter??" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland.", ">\n\nBitter??", ">\n\nYeah maybe op tasted dark chocolate ice cream which would make more sense as to why it tasted bitter." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland.", ">\n\nBitter??", ">\n\nYeah maybe op tasted dark chocolate ice cream which would make more sense as to why it tasted bitter.", ">\n\nBecause its not chocolate ice cream. Its cocoa with about 20% chocolate, so that they are allowed to call it chocolate." ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland.", ">\n\nBitter??", ">\n\nYeah maybe op tasted dark chocolate ice cream which would make more sense as to why it tasted bitter.", ">\n\nBecause its not chocolate ice cream. Its cocoa with about 20% chocolate, so that they are allowed to call it chocolate.", ">\n\nHm thanks for the information, that explains the bitter taste" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland.", ">\n\nBitter??", ">\n\nYeah maybe op tasted dark chocolate ice cream which would make more sense as to why it tasted bitter.", ">\n\nBecause its not chocolate ice cream. Its cocoa with about 20% chocolate, so that they are allowed to call it chocolate.", ">\n\nHm thanks for the information, that explains the bitter taste", ">\n\nSounds like you’ve just had crappy chocolate ice cream" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland.", ">\n\nBitter??", ">\n\nYeah maybe op tasted dark chocolate ice cream which would make more sense as to why it tasted bitter.", ">\n\nBecause its not chocolate ice cream. Its cocoa with about 20% chocolate, so that they are allowed to call it chocolate.", ">\n\nHm thanks for the information, that explains the bitter taste", ">\n\nSounds like you’ve just had crappy chocolate ice cream", ">\n\nStill waiting to taste the good ones" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland.", ">\n\nBitter??", ">\n\nYeah maybe op tasted dark chocolate ice cream which would make more sense as to why it tasted bitter.", ">\n\nBecause its not chocolate ice cream. Its cocoa with about 20% chocolate, so that they are allowed to call it chocolate.", ">\n\nHm thanks for the information, that explains the bitter taste", ">\n\nSounds like you’ve just had crappy chocolate ice cream", ">\n\nStill waiting to taste the good ones", ">\n\nYou're probably eating shitty, cheap icecream" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland.", ">\n\nBitter??", ">\n\nYeah maybe op tasted dark chocolate ice cream which would make more sense as to why it tasted bitter.", ">\n\nBecause its not chocolate ice cream. Its cocoa with about 20% chocolate, so that they are allowed to call it chocolate.", ">\n\nHm thanks for the information, that explains the bitter taste", ">\n\nSounds like you’ve just had crappy chocolate ice cream", ">\n\nStill waiting to taste the good ones", ">\n\nYou're probably eating shitty, cheap icecream", ">\n\nI have notice a lot of ice cream brands switch to \"chocolaty\"" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland.", ">\n\nBitter??", ">\n\nYeah maybe op tasted dark chocolate ice cream which would make more sense as to why it tasted bitter.", ">\n\nBecause its not chocolate ice cream. Its cocoa with about 20% chocolate, so that they are allowed to call it chocolate.", ">\n\nHm thanks for the information, that explains the bitter taste", ">\n\nSounds like you’ve just had crappy chocolate ice cream", ">\n\nStill waiting to taste the good ones", ">\n\nYou're probably eating shitty, cheap icecream", ">\n\nI have notice a lot of ice cream brands switch to \"chocolaty\"", ">\n\nBut Friendly's Forbidden Chocolate ice cream is so good smh then again I'm a whore for chocolate haha" ]

[ "Vanilla for life", ">\n\nIt just tastes so good", ">\n\nHere on the west coast of the U.S. Tillamook creamery makes the best chocolate ice cream “Tillamook Mudslide”. If you ever have a chance try some it’ll change your life.", ">\n\nEast Coaster here, can confirm Tillamook transcends all other chocolate icecream.", ">\n\nAgree!!! Chocolate alone is good, vanilla ice cream is good, but chocolate ice cream ain’t great. Bitter.", ">\n\nYes, it's not satisfying to eat that on a hot summer", ">\n\nOn that note, I hate rocky road ice cream.", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is too rich. Ice cream is inherently rich, and when you add a flavor that is also rich and not light like vanilla, it's way too much", ">\n\nI agree. Mind you it would help if chocolate ice cream tasted even vaguely of chocolate. Generally it tastes of............actually nothing I could identify.", ">\n\nSame, at first I was shocked that it was actually chocolate flavored, chocolate tastes so good actually when it's not ice cream", ">\n\nVanilla, amen.", ">\n\n🙏", ">\n\nChocolate ice cream is ok but I like vanilla with fudge mixed in it better", ">\n\nAgree, just that for me chocolate ice cream was barely ok", ">\n\nBrownies with vanilla ice cream is the best. I agree fully, chocolate ice cream is not what people say it is.", ">\n\nYes! Omg i am Not alone with this , i allways feel Bad in my mouth after chocolate icecream i also dislike IT for me its the powdery Aftertaste too eww\nI Also dont Like chocolate at all xD", ">\n\nI think you just haven’t had good choclate ice cream.", ">\n\nAgreed, best chocolate icecream is very dark, that light stuff is always bland.", ">\n\nBitter??", ">\n\nYeah maybe op tasted dark chocolate ice cream which would make more sense as to why it tasted bitter.", ">\n\nBecause its not chocolate ice cream. Its cocoa with about 20% chocolate, so that they are allowed to call it chocolate.", ">\n\nHm thanks for the information, that explains the bitter taste", ">\n\nSounds like you’ve just had crappy chocolate ice cream", ">\n\nStill waiting to taste the good ones", ">\n\nYou're probably eating shitty, cheap icecream", ">\n\nI have notice a lot of ice cream brands switch to \"chocolaty\"", ">\n\nBut Friendly's Forbidden Chocolate ice cream is so good smh then again I'm a whore for chocolate haha", ">\n\nI like the ones that taste like pudding" ]

[]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?" ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"" ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"" ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"" ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians.", ">\n\nI find it interesting that this party has a greater hand in creating the welfare state it so heavily rejects by floating legislation and political agendas that encourage the birth of more unwanted children.\nGuess it's God's Will™!" ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians.", ">\n\nI find it interesting that this party has a greater hand in creating the welfare state it so heavily rejects by floating legislation and political agendas that encourage the birth of more unwanted children.\nGuess it's God's Will™!", ">\n\nThey don't dislike welfare, they dislike having to give welfare money to poor people. They will happily spend it on all kinds of things including giving it to a rich former NFL player to build a volleyball stadium for his daughter.\nThere is an ongoing effort on the part of republicans to switch to a Block Grant approach for welfare. As it currently stands the Federal Government has rules on how it can be spent. Republicans claim the rules don't allow for the states to craft spending on local needs...which is really just code for \"we would like to decide how to spend the money wealthier states are giving us for our poor without any pesky oversight, but you can totally trust that we will spend your money on only the very needy it is intended for because that is currently what we do...even though we don't.\"" ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians.", ">\n\nI find it interesting that this party has a greater hand in creating the welfare state it so heavily rejects by floating legislation and political agendas that encourage the birth of more unwanted children.\nGuess it's God's Will™!", ">\n\nThey don't dislike welfare, they dislike having to give welfare money to poor people. They will happily spend it on all kinds of things including giving it to a rich former NFL player to build a volleyball stadium for his daughter.\nThere is an ongoing effort on the part of republicans to switch to a Block Grant approach for welfare. As it currently stands the Federal Government has rules on how it can be spent. Republicans claim the rules don't allow for the states to craft spending on local needs...which is really just code for \"we would like to decide how to spend the money wealthier states are giving us for our poor without any pesky oversight, but you can totally trust that we will spend your money on only the very needy it is intended for because that is currently what we do...even though we don't.\"", ">\n\nWelfare should go to poor people. Full stop.\n'financial support given to those in need.' is the textbook definition. I know the Rs wont abide by that since they live in a whole other reality or whatever." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians.", ">\n\nI find it interesting that this party has a greater hand in creating the welfare state it so heavily rejects by floating legislation and political agendas that encourage the birth of more unwanted children.\nGuess it's God's Will™!", ">\n\nThey don't dislike welfare, they dislike having to give welfare money to poor people. They will happily spend it on all kinds of things including giving it to a rich former NFL player to build a volleyball stadium for his daughter.\nThere is an ongoing effort on the part of republicans to switch to a Block Grant approach for welfare. As it currently stands the Federal Government has rules on how it can be spent. Republicans claim the rules don't allow for the states to craft spending on local needs...which is really just code for \"we would like to decide how to spend the money wealthier states are giving us for our poor without any pesky oversight, but you can totally trust that we will spend your money on only the very needy it is intended for because that is currently what we do...even though we don't.\"", ">\n\nWelfare should go to poor people. Full stop.\n'financial support given to those in need.' is the textbook definition. I know the Rs wont abide by that since they live in a whole other reality or whatever.", ">\n\nA rising tide lifts all boats. \nHelping people out of poverty means more educated people, more healthy and successful children, more money going into the economy. It means people get a chance to reach their potential and do good for others through a career they might not have been able to access, for instance. Welfare and other social safety nets benefit our whole population." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians.", ">\n\nI find it interesting that this party has a greater hand in creating the welfare state it so heavily rejects by floating legislation and political agendas that encourage the birth of more unwanted children.\nGuess it's God's Will™!", ">\n\nThey don't dislike welfare, they dislike having to give welfare money to poor people. They will happily spend it on all kinds of things including giving it to a rich former NFL player to build a volleyball stadium for his daughter.\nThere is an ongoing effort on the part of republicans to switch to a Block Grant approach for welfare. As it currently stands the Federal Government has rules on how it can be spent. Republicans claim the rules don't allow for the states to craft spending on local needs...which is really just code for \"we would like to decide how to spend the money wealthier states are giving us for our poor without any pesky oversight, but you can totally trust that we will spend your money on only the very needy it is intended for because that is currently what we do...even though we don't.\"", ">\n\nWelfare should go to poor people. Full stop.\n'financial support given to those in need.' is the textbook definition. I know the Rs wont abide by that since they live in a whole other reality or whatever.", ">\n\nA rising tide lifts all boats. \nHelping people out of poverty means more educated people, more healthy and successful children, more money going into the economy. It means people get a chance to reach their potential and do good for others through a career they might not have been able to access, for instance. Welfare and other social safety nets benefit our whole population.", ">\n\nIf you have an ectopic pregnancy in Tennessee right now they will literally let you die in your hospital bed. Unless you can make it to Illinois in time to be successfully treated it is a death sentence. And Republicans think this is a \"messaging\" problem." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians.", ">\n\nI find it interesting that this party has a greater hand in creating the welfare state it so heavily rejects by floating legislation and political agendas that encourage the birth of more unwanted children.\nGuess it's God's Will™!", ">\n\nThey don't dislike welfare, they dislike having to give welfare money to poor people. They will happily spend it on all kinds of things including giving it to a rich former NFL player to build a volleyball stadium for his daughter.\nThere is an ongoing effort on the part of republicans to switch to a Block Grant approach for welfare. As it currently stands the Federal Government has rules on how it can be spent. Republicans claim the rules don't allow for the states to craft spending on local needs...which is really just code for \"we would like to decide how to spend the money wealthier states are giving us for our poor without any pesky oversight, but you can totally trust that we will spend your money on only the very needy it is intended for because that is currently what we do...even though we don't.\"", ">\n\nWelfare should go to poor people. Full stop.\n'financial support given to those in need.' is the textbook definition. I know the Rs wont abide by that since they live in a whole other reality or whatever.", ">\n\nA rising tide lifts all boats. \nHelping people out of poverty means more educated people, more healthy and successful children, more money going into the economy. It means people get a chance to reach their potential and do good for others through a career they might not have been able to access, for instance. Welfare and other social safety nets benefit our whole population.", ">\n\nIf you have an ectopic pregnancy in Tennessee right now they will literally let you die in your hospital bed. Unless you can make it to Illinois in time to be successfully treated it is a death sentence. And Republicans think this is a \"messaging\" problem.", ">\n\nThe messaging problem is the one where they fail to listen to reason." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians.", ">\n\nI find it interesting that this party has a greater hand in creating the welfare state it so heavily rejects by floating legislation and political agendas that encourage the birth of more unwanted children.\nGuess it's God's Will™!", ">\n\nThey don't dislike welfare, they dislike having to give welfare money to poor people. They will happily spend it on all kinds of things including giving it to a rich former NFL player to build a volleyball stadium for his daughter.\nThere is an ongoing effort on the part of republicans to switch to a Block Grant approach for welfare. As it currently stands the Federal Government has rules on how it can be spent. Republicans claim the rules don't allow for the states to craft spending on local needs...which is really just code for \"we would like to decide how to spend the money wealthier states are giving us for our poor without any pesky oversight, but you can totally trust that we will spend your money on only the very needy it is intended for because that is currently what we do...even though we don't.\"", ">\n\nWelfare should go to poor people. Full stop.\n'financial support given to those in need.' is the textbook definition. I know the Rs wont abide by that since they live in a whole other reality or whatever.", ">\n\nA rising tide lifts all boats. \nHelping people out of poverty means more educated people, more healthy and successful children, more money going into the economy. It means people get a chance to reach their potential and do good for others through a career they might not have been able to access, for instance. Welfare and other social safety nets benefit our whole population.", ">\n\nIf you have an ectopic pregnancy in Tennessee right now they will literally let you die in your hospital bed. Unless you can make it to Illinois in time to be successfully treated it is a death sentence. And Republicans think this is a \"messaging\" problem.", ">\n\nThe messaging problem is the one where they fail to listen to reason.", ">\n\nThere is a branch within the conservative movement rejects the enlightenment and liberal values, so yes, there are those that literally reject reason in order to embrace faith." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians.", ">\n\nI find it interesting that this party has a greater hand in creating the welfare state it so heavily rejects by floating legislation and political agendas that encourage the birth of more unwanted children.\nGuess it's God's Will™!", ">\n\nThey don't dislike welfare, they dislike having to give welfare money to poor people. They will happily spend it on all kinds of things including giving it to a rich former NFL player to build a volleyball stadium for his daughter.\nThere is an ongoing effort on the part of republicans to switch to a Block Grant approach for welfare. As it currently stands the Federal Government has rules on how it can be spent. Republicans claim the rules don't allow for the states to craft spending on local needs...which is really just code for \"we would like to decide how to spend the money wealthier states are giving us for our poor without any pesky oversight, but you can totally trust that we will spend your money on only the very needy it is intended for because that is currently what we do...even though we don't.\"", ">\n\nWelfare should go to poor people. Full stop.\n'financial support given to those in need.' is the textbook definition. I know the Rs wont abide by that since they live in a whole other reality or whatever.", ">\n\nA rising tide lifts all boats. \nHelping people out of poverty means more educated people, more healthy and successful children, more money going into the economy. It means people get a chance to reach their potential and do good for others through a career they might not have been able to access, for instance. Welfare and other social safety nets benefit our whole population.", ">\n\nIf you have an ectopic pregnancy in Tennessee right now they will literally let you die in your hospital bed. Unless you can make it to Illinois in time to be successfully treated it is a death sentence. And Republicans think this is a \"messaging\" problem.", ">\n\nThe messaging problem is the one where they fail to listen to reason.", ">\n\nThere is a branch within the conservative movement rejects the enlightenment and liberal values, so yes, there are those that literally reject reason in order to embrace faith.", ">\n\n“Republicans think about lying about their stances on abortion to try to appeal to citizens now that they got what they wanted from scotus”\nThis is like claiming that the reconstruction era was filled with confederates trying to right their wrongs" ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians.", ">\n\nI find it interesting that this party has a greater hand in creating the welfare state it so heavily rejects by floating legislation and political agendas that encourage the birth of more unwanted children.\nGuess it's God's Will™!", ">\n\nThey don't dislike welfare, they dislike having to give welfare money to poor people. They will happily spend it on all kinds of things including giving it to a rich former NFL player to build a volleyball stadium for his daughter.\nThere is an ongoing effort on the part of republicans to switch to a Block Grant approach for welfare. As it currently stands the Federal Government has rules on how it can be spent. Republicans claim the rules don't allow for the states to craft spending on local needs...which is really just code for \"we would like to decide how to spend the money wealthier states are giving us for our poor without any pesky oversight, but you can totally trust that we will spend your money on only the very needy it is intended for because that is currently what we do...even though we don't.\"", ">\n\nWelfare should go to poor people. Full stop.\n'financial support given to those in need.' is the textbook definition. I know the Rs wont abide by that since they live in a whole other reality or whatever.", ">\n\nA rising tide lifts all boats. \nHelping people out of poverty means more educated people, more healthy and successful children, more money going into the economy. It means people get a chance to reach their potential and do good for others through a career they might not have been able to access, for instance. Welfare and other social safety nets benefit our whole population.", ">\n\nIf you have an ectopic pregnancy in Tennessee right now they will literally let you die in your hospital bed. Unless you can make it to Illinois in time to be successfully treated it is a death sentence. And Republicans think this is a \"messaging\" problem.", ">\n\nThe messaging problem is the one where they fail to listen to reason.", ">\n\nThere is a branch within the conservative movement rejects the enlightenment and liberal values, so yes, there are those that literally reject reason in order to embrace faith.", ">\n\n“Republicans think about lying about their stances on abortion to try to appeal to citizens now that they got what they wanted from scotus”\nThis is like claiming that the reconstruction era was filled with confederates trying to right their wrongs", ">\n\n\nRepublicans are recalibrating their messaging on abortion...\n\nNo, they don't get to rethink something that's already been implemented. The damage is done and the Republican's did it. The women who's lives have been drastically changed due to the Republican's wedge issue cannot recalibrate. \nRepublican's have demonstrated they want to legislate women's bodies, our bedrooms, and our relationships according to the rules they pick and choose from their bronze age religion. They will govern us back to the 1600s with their push for an American theocracy; that is who they are." ]

[ "Those midterms were not bruising enough.", ">\n\nNo they weren't, many were razor-thin margins. It's a damn good thing that the GOP is a hair better than the Dems at shooting themselves in the foot.", ">\n\nThe thing about that is, by several measures, the republicans should’ve swept congress up. Between the gerrymandering, ownership of many crucial roles in state governments, and the midterm schlacking every dem pres seems to receive after their first two years, the fact that they didn’t even fully take congress, even if by razor thin margins, is a disaster for them.", ">\n\nYa if it's even close to the same environment in 2024 they are fucked and they know it because a new voting rights act will destroy all their gerrymandering.", ">\n\nWouldn't the House (and Senate, but the House'll be held by the GOP) need to pass a new voting rights act? Or did they pass one and I missed it?", ">\n\nAs I recall, the House tried by passing it and it died in the Senate.", ">\n\nThe House will deliberately pass bills knowing the Senate won't pass them. Too many corporate shills in Congress. If it weren't for Biden getting on their asses all the time they wouldn't have passed ANYTHING.", ">\n\nThe only thing the House is planning to do for the next two years is attack Biden. Because somehow that'll lower inflation and crime. 🤷‍♂️ The WH is already hiring lawyers in preparation that's how little of a secret it is.", ">\n\nStrategy??\n\"The people don't want to ban abortions\"\n\"I know, but how do we make them THINK they want to ban abortions?\"", ">\n\nInvent terms like “partial birth abortion,” and pretend they’re commonly used by irresponsible hussies and evil devil worshiping democrats and ignore the fact that they’re one of the rarest forms of abortion that’s almost exclusively performed when a woman’s life is in danger or the fetus is no longer viable. It’s actually an effective strategy to get votes. The problem is when you get enough votes to create change, the change reveals the lie.", ">\n\nGo further, actually. Keep spreading stories about “a new law” democrats are trying to pass that allows children up to X months after birth to be killed.\nWatched that one happen in my family idk how many times at this point.\n“No literally no one wants that what the fuck?” They don’t care. It validates their hate of dems.", ">\n\nHow is it that the same argument in the opposite direction does not work ?\n\"You want to force women to marry their rappist.\"\n\"You prefer that a woman dies because her foetus has a medical condition than abort her. It is just murder at this point.\"", ">\n\nRepublicans are good at victim blaming. The replies to your questions would be\n\"What was she wearing?\"\nAnd\n\"Should have kept her legs closed.\"", ">\n\nTrue. Sad though.", ">\n\nMinding their own business would be a good strategy.", ">\n\nThey’re incapable of this.", ">\n\nHow does one classify a \"deeply held moral or religious belief\" as something that can be altered for strategic use...\n...l mean, unless of course it ISN'T a deeply held moral or religious belief by the person making the claim.\nI'm sure that's just me being cynical on acold Thursday morning and not at all the modus operandi of Republican politicians.", ">\n\nI find it interesting that this party has a greater hand in creating the welfare state it so heavily rejects by floating legislation and political agendas that encourage the birth of more unwanted children.\nGuess it's God's Will™!", ">\n\nThey don't dislike welfare, they dislike having to give welfare money to poor people. They will happily spend it on all kinds of things including giving it to a rich former NFL player to build a volleyball stadium for his daughter.\nThere is an ongoing effort on the part of republicans to switch to a Block Grant approach for welfare. As it currently stands the Federal Government has rules on how it can be spent. Republicans claim the rules don't allow for the states to craft spending on local needs...which is really just code for \"we would like to decide how to spend the money wealthier states are giving us for our poor without any pesky oversight, but you can totally trust that we will spend your money on only the very needy it is intended for because that is currently what we do...even though we don't.\"", ">\n\nWelfare should go to poor people. Full stop.\n'financial support given to those in need.' is the textbook definition. I know the Rs wont abide by that since they live in a whole other reality or whatever.", ">\n\nA rising tide lifts all boats. \nHelping people out of poverty means more educated people, more healthy and successful children, more money going into the economy. It means people get a chance to reach their potential and do good for others through a career they might not have been able to access, for instance. Welfare and other social safety nets benefit our whole population.", ">\n\nIf you have an ectopic pregnancy in Tennessee right now they will literally let you die in your hospital bed. Unless you can make it to Illinois in time to be successfully treated it is a death sentence. And Republicans think this is a \"messaging\" problem.", ">\n\nThe messaging problem is the one where they fail to listen to reason.", ">\n\nThere is a branch within the conservative movement rejects the enlightenment and liberal values, so yes, there are those that literally reject reason in order to embrace faith.", ">\n\n“Republicans think about lying about their stances on abortion to try to appeal to citizens now that they got what they wanted from scotus”\nThis is like claiming that the reconstruction era was filled with confederates trying to right their wrongs", ">\n\n\nRepublicans are recalibrating their messaging on abortion...\n\nNo, they don't get to rethink something that's already been implemented. The damage is done and the Republican's did it. The women who's lives have been drastically changed due to the Republican's wedge issue cannot recalibrate. \nRepublican's have demonstrated they want to legislate women's bodies, our bedrooms, and our relationships according to the rules they pick and choose from their bronze age religion. They will govern us back to the 1600s with their push for an American theocracy; that is who they are.", ">\n\nIt's already their brand.\nThey can't abort it." ]