Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset3

like 0

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi..." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?..." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find." ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?" ]

[ "So I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords.....", ">\n\nSo I would assume as a show of good faith they will thoroughly and impartially investigate every Republican member of Congress who took pandemic loans and make sure all of them were not committing any fraud right?\n​\nright?", ">\n\nAbsolutely they will! First, they'll need to investigate Hunter Biden's laptop.", ">\n\nC'mon, let's give them some credit, I'm sure the first thing they'll do is to investigate Hunter Biden's Lapto....\nWhat I meant to say is, the first order on the agenda will surely be to investigate Hunter Biden's Laa^a^a ....\nThe most critical item on their list will be to investigate Hunter Bi...", ">\n\nDamm autocorrect 😅", ">\n\nbut Hilarys emails!?", ">\n\nJesus thats a spooky read.", ">\n\nHa, I think you misspelled unemployment/ Medicaid fraud that happened during Covid (if they even look into that). The GOP and government in general loves going after folks that got 1k too much in unemployment or other benefits and not the companies that received millions. Even still, they probably will focus mainly on missteps by Democrats like Cuomo underreporting nursing home deaths.", ">\n\nPay particular attention to the first two years of government help. You know, the two years where Trump killed the standard government audit of dispensed funds, hired a crony of his to track the payments, and never once produced any type of report showing us where the funds went. If you are going to investigate, start at the beginning.", ">\n\nGood. I hope they look at themselves too.", ">\n\nAs Hannibal Lector once said, “Did you come to see me to get the old scent back? You want the scent? Smell yourself.”", ">\n\nI think that's great. They're starting with Jared, right?", ">\n\nThe only fraud was by rich republicans", ">\n\n*Republicans waste more taxpayer money", ">\n\nSo they'll finally go after Trump for firing the congressional appointed Inspector General?", ">\n\nThey are investigating themselves?", ">\n\nI mean, I don’t care who gets punished for abusing this system, but aren’t they bound to identify a bunch of republicans who did this? How are they going to spin this one into a democrat-only problem?", ">\n\nGOP trying to cover-up their crimes I see with mismanagement of funds since Trump fired the oversight.", ">\n\nWith Jim Jordan at the wheel, he'll for sure take things as serious as if they were sexual assault allegations.", ">\n\nWhat are the chances they'll find it started when Trump was President?", ">\n\nGood, start with their own caucus.", ">\n\nThey ought to investigate themselves then.", ">\n\n\"We stole it.\" \nSuItCaSe ClOsEd!", ">\n\nOh are they going to investigate all of the PPP loans?...", ">\n\nThey better be careful, Fraud and Republican’s go together like Olives and oil.", ">\n\nOh, they’ll do an investigation no fine no Republicans did anything wrong. That’s the whole point of the investigation.", ">\n\nSo they will investigate all but themselves and their donors, all the while focusing on business run by anyone non-white individual.", ">\n\nThey might find some stuff they didn’t want to find.", ">\n\nIncoming /r/leopardsatemyface moment?", ">\n\nI hope the myriad of Republican senators and representatives are in those sites. It surely won't be their corporate patron and overlords....." ]

[]

[ "Did the russians do it again?" ]

[ "Did the russians do it again?", ">\n\nNoone cares as Europe has just forbidden Diesel imports as well petrol starting 5th of February. Russia can't sell gas, petroleum, diesel, kerosine, LNG - everything that's made out of oil to the EU anymore. That's what happens when you try to blackmail a whole continent." ]

[ "Did the russians do it again?", ">\n\nNoone cares as Europe has just forbidden Diesel imports as well petrol starting 5th of February. Russia can't sell gas, petroleum, diesel, kerosine, LNG - everything that's made out of oil to the EU anymore. That's what happens when you try to blackmail a whole continent.", ">\n\nAre you sure about LNG?" ]

[ "Did the russians do it again?", ">\n\nNoone cares as Europe has just forbidden Diesel imports as well petrol starting 5th of February. Russia can't sell gas, petroleum, diesel, kerosine, LNG - everything that's made out of oil to the EU anymore. That's what happens when you try to blackmail a whole continent.", ">\n\nAre you sure about LNG?", ">\n\nWell you have a point. The EU is still trying to find a way to seize to import LNG from Russia since some countries are still doing that. I'm sure that will happen soon though." ]

[ "Did the russians do it again?", ">\n\nNoone cares as Europe has just forbidden Diesel imports as well petrol starting 5th of February. Russia can't sell gas, petroleum, diesel, kerosine, LNG - everything that's made out of oil to the EU anymore. That's what happens when you try to blackmail a whole continent.", ">\n\nAre you sure about LNG?", ">\n\nWell you have a point. The EU is still trying to find a way to seize to import LNG from Russia since some countries are still doing that. I'm sure that will happen soon though.", ">\n\nWhether who did does not matter so long as Russia is prevented from earning money from their oil." ]

[ "Did the russians do it again?", ">\n\nNoone cares as Europe has just forbidden Diesel imports as well petrol starting 5th of February. Russia can't sell gas, petroleum, diesel, kerosine, LNG - everything that's made out of oil to the EU anymore. That's what happens when you try to blackmail a whole continent.", ">\n\nAre you sure about LNG?", ">\n\nWell you have a point. The EU is still trying to find a way to seize to import LNG from Russia since some countries are still doing that. I'm sure that will happen soon though.", ">\n\nWhether who did does not matter so long as Russia is prevented from earning money from their oil.", ">\n\nThe article mentions that land locked european countries have no other option to import oil, so they are exempt from sanctions. If that is the case, and they have no other option, than this hurts the people of those countries as well." ]

[]

[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 63%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe U.S. is planning to begin training Ukrainian troops on the Patriot air defense system at Fort Sill, Okla., later this month, according to three defense officials.\nThe first group will consist of just under 100 Ukrainian service members with some experience in air defense systems.\nThree U.S. defense officials told NBC News on Dec. 13 that the U.S. was poised to approve sending a Patriot missile battery to Ukraine, finally agreeing to an urgent request from Ukrainian leaders desperate for more robust weapons to shoot down incoming Russian missiles.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Patriot^#1 Ukrainian^#2 missile^#3 officials^#4 defense^#5" ]

[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 63%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe U.S. is planning to begin training Ukrainian troops on the Patriot air defense system at Fort Sill, Okla., later this month, according to three defense officials.\nThe first group will consist of just under 100 Ukrainian service members with some experience in air defense systems.\nThree U.S. defense officials told NBC News on Dec. 13 that the U.S. was poised to approve sending a Patriot missile battery to Ukraine, finally agreeing to an urgent request from Ukrainian leaders desperate for more robust weapons to shoot down incoming Russian missiles.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Patriot^#1 Ukrainian^#2 missile^#3 officials^#4 defense^#5", ">\n\nHope Ukrainians are fast learner." ]

[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 63%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe U.S. is planning to begin training Ukrainian troops on the Patriot air defense system at Fort Sill, Okla., later this month, according to three defense officials.\nThe first group will consist of just under 100 Ukrainian service members with some experience in air defense systems.\nThree U.S. defense officials told NBC News on Dec. 13 that the U.S. was poised to approve sending a Patriot missile battery to Ukraine, finally agreeing to an urgent request from Ukrainian leaders desperate for more robust weapons to shoot down incoming Russian missiles.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Patriot^#1 Ukrainian^#2 missile^#3 officials^#4 defense^#5", ">\n\nHope Ukrainians are fast learner.", ">\n\nNeat. Slava ukraini. I hope this will help in the defense of their land against the vicious rapists from the east." ]

[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 63%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe U.S. is planning to begin training Ukrainian troops on the Patriot air defense system at Fort Sill, Okla., later this month, according to three defense officials.\nThe first group will consist of just under 100 Ukrainian service members with some experience in air defense systems.\nThree U.S. defense officials told NBC News on Dec. 13 that the U.S. was poised to approve sending a Patriot missile battery to Ukraine, finally agreeing to an urgent request from Ukrainian leaders desperate for more robust weapons to shoot down incoming Russian missiles.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Patriot^#1 Ukrainian^#2 missile^#3 officials^#4 defense^#5", ">\n\nHope Ukrainians are fast learner.", ">\n\nNeat. Slava ukraini. I hope this will help in the defense of their land against the vicious rapists from the east.", ">\n\nHow would Patriot integrate with Ukrainian S300? If an object is detected by both which one will fire?" ]

[]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless" ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault" ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic" ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?" ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did" ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"" ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me.", ">\n\n\nHowever now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \n\nRight, the political point being that one side is anti-immigrant nativists who have extreme overlap with the racist elements in the nation, and the other side just treats them like normal people?\nIt should be easy to immigrate to America, that is the immigration policy under which we became the world's foremost economic powerhouse." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me.", ">\n\n\nHowever now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \n\nRight, the political point being that one side is anti-immigrant nativists who have extreme overlap with the racist elements in the nation, and the other side just treats them like normal people?\nIt should be easy to immigrate to America, that is the immigration policy under which we became the world's foremost economic powerhouse.", ">\n\nSo you think the right has either of our best interests at heart?! Stop with the us verses them mentality please. Have you compared how other developed nations in the world deal with citizenship and immigration?" ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me.", ">\n\n\nHowever now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \n\nRight, the political point being that one side is anti-immigrant nativists who have extreme overlap with the racist elements in the nation, and the other side just treats them like normal people?\nIt should be easy to immigrate to America, that is the immigration policy under which we became the world's foremost economic powerhouse.", ">\n\nSo you think the right has either of our best interests at heart?! Stop with the us verses them mentality please. Have you compared how other developed nations in the world deal with citizenship and immigration?", ">\n\nI have, but I didn't find it particularly relevant, because America is not those countries. Our historical identity was practically formed on immigration and free trade, very reflective of the Netherlands during its glory days. The Dutch way of economics was a very strong component of the fabric of American identity, the idea that people should be able to trade and exist freely within the territory. While other countries closed themselves off and restricted who could enter, we accepted just about everyone. And for that we became the greatest economic powerhouse in world history. Until 9/11, and then we decided to start prosecuting illegal border crossers criminally instead of civilly. How have we been doing since then?\nImagine being a passenger on the MS St. Louis in 1939. You're Jewish, and you've managed to get all the way from Germany to the shores of America, along with 900 others. Then, you're informed that you'll have to turn around and seek asylum elsewhere, because the US won't take you. Imagine that. Now imagine a family fleeing cartel violence, showing up at the border, and being told to wait in line because right wing Americans think the country is \"too full\". History rhymes." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me.", ">\n\n\nHowever now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \n\nRight, the political point being that one side is anti-immigrant nativists who have extreme overlap with the racist elements in the nation, and the other side just treats them like normal people?\nIt should be easy to immigrate to America, that is the immigration policy under which we became the world's foremost economic powerhouse.", ">\n\nSo you think the right has either of our best interests at heart?! Stop with the us verses them mentality please. Have you compared how other developed nations in the world deal with citizenship and immigration?", ">\n\nI have, but I didn't find it particularly relevant, because America is not those countries. Our historical identity was practically formed on immigration and free trade, very reflective of the Netherlands during its glory days. The Dutch way of economics was a very strong component of the fabric of American identity, the idea that people should be able to trade and exist freely within the territory. While other countries closed themselves off and restricted who could enter, we accepted just about everyone. And for that we became the greatest economic powerhouse in world history. Until 9/11, and then we decided to start prosecuting illegal border crossers criminally instead of civilly. How have we been doing since then?\nImagine being a passenger on the MS St. Louis in 1939. You're Jewish, and you've managed to get all the way from Germany to the shores of America, along with 900 others. Then, you're informed that you'll have to turn around and seek asylum elsewhere, because the US won't take you. Imagine that. Now imagine a family fleeing cartel violence, showing up at the border, and being told to wait in line because right wing Americans think the country is \"too full\". History rhymes.", ">\n\nPolis is one of the most popular governors in the country and even he doesn't want to deal with the impacts of semi-open borders. I wonder when Congress will do something and why the Dems did not prioritize this when they controlled both Houses of Congress?" ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me.", ">\n\n\nHowever now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \n\nRight, the political point being that one side is anti-immigrant nativists who have extreme overlap with the racist elements in the nation, and the other side just treats them like normal people?\nIt should be easy to immigrate to America, that is the immigration policy under which we became the world's foremost economic powerhouse.", ">\n\nSo you think the right has either of our best interests at heart?! Stop with the us verses them mentality please. Have you compared how other developed nations in the world deal with citizenship and immigration?", ">\n\nI have, but I didn't find it particularly relevant, because America is not those countries. Our historical identity was practically formed on immigration and free trade, very reflective of the Netherlands during its glory days. The Dutch way of economics was a very strong component of the fabric of American identity, the idea that people should be able to trade and exist freely within the territory. While other countries closed themselves off and restricted who could enter, we accepted just about everyone. And for that we became the greatest economic powerhouse in world history. Until 9/11, and then we decided to start prosecuting illegal border crossers criminally instead of civilly. How have we been doing since then?\nImagine being a passenger on the MS St. Louis in 1939. You're Jewish, and you've managed to get all the way from Germany to the shores of America, along with 900 others. Then, you're informed that you'll have to turn around and seek asylum elsewhere, because the US won't take you. Imagine that. Now imagine a family fleeing cartel violence, showing up at the border, and being told to wait in line because right wing Americans think the country is \"too full\". History rhymes.", ">\n\nPolis is one of the most popular governors in the country and even he doesn't want to deal with the impacts of semi-open borders. I wonder when Congress will do something and why the Dems did not prioritize this when they controlled both Houses of Congress?", ">\n\nIf you think we have semi-open borders now, you must not take much pride in American history." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me.", ">\n\n\nHowever now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \n\nRight, the political point being that one side is anti-immigrant nativists who have extreme overlap with the racist elements in the nation, and the other side just treats them like normal people?\nIt should be easy to immigrate to America, that is the immigration policy under which we became the world's foremost economic powerhouse.", ">\n\nSo you think the right has either of our best interests at heart?! Stop with the us verses them mentality please. Have you compared how other developed nations in the world deal with citizenship and immigration?", ">\n\nI have, but I didn't find it particularly relevant, because America is not those countries. Our historical identity was practically formed on immigration and free trade, very reflective of the Netherlands during its glory days. The Dutch way of economics was a very strong component of the fabric of American identity, the idea that people should be able to trade and exist freely within the territory. While other countries closed themselves off and restricted who could enter, we accepted just about everyone. And for that we became the greatest economic powerhouse in world history. Until 9/11, and then we decided to start prosecuting illegal border crossers criminally instead of civilly. How have we been doing since then?\nImagine being a passenger on the MS St. Louis in 1939. You're Jewish, and you've managed to get all the way from Germany to the shores of America, along with 900 others. Then, you're informed that you'll have to turn around and seek asylum elsewhere, because the US won't take you. Imagine that. Now imagine a family fleeing cartel violence, showing up at the border, and being told to wait in line because right wing Americans think the country is \"too full\". History rhymes.", ">\n\nPolis is one of the most popular governors in the country and even he doesn't want to deal with the impacts of semi-open borders. I wonder when Congress will do something and why the Dems did not prioritize this when they controlled both Houses of Congress?", ">\n\nIf you think we have semi-open borders now, you must not take much pride in American history.", ">\n\n4M refugees or illegals have entered the country in the last two years." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me.", ">\n\n\nHowever now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \n\nRight, the political point being that one side is anti-immigrant nativists who have extreme overlap with the racist elements in the nation, and the other side just treats them like normal people?\nIt should be easy to immigrate to America, that is the immigration policy under which we became the world's foremost economic powerhouse.", ">\n\nSo you think the right has either of our best interests at heart?! Stop with the us verses them mentality please. Have you compared how other developed nations in the world deal with citizenship and immigration?", ">\n\nI have, but I didn't find it particularly relevant, because America is not those countries. Our historical identity was practically formed on immigration and free trade, very reflective of the Netherlands during its glory days. The Dutch way of economics was a very strong component of the fabric of American identity, the idea that people should be able to trade and exist freely within the territory. While other countries closed themselves off and restricted who could enter, we accepted just about everyone. And for that we became the greatest economic powerhouse in world history. Until 9/11, and then we decided to start prosecuting illegal border crossers criminally instead of civilly. How have we been doing since then?\nImagine being a passenger on the MS St. Louis in 1939. You're Jewish, and you've managed to get all the way from Germany to the shores of America, along with 900 others. Then, you're informed that you'll have to turn around and seek asylum elsewhere, because the US won't take you. Imagine that. Now imagine a family fleeing cartel violence, showing up at the border, and being told to wait in line because right wing Americans think the country is \"too full\". History rhymes.", ">\n\nPolis is one of the most popular governors in the country and even he doesn't want to deal with the impacts of semi-open borders. I wonder when Congress will do something and why the Dems did not prioritize this when they controlled both Houses of Congress?", ">\n\nIf you think we have semi-open borders now, you must not take much pride in American history.", ">\n\n4M refugees or illegals have entered the country in the last two years.", ">\n\nYes, and we're only now just normalizing back to the level of immigrants we had back in the 1850's.\nYou think this is a lot because you don't understand that historically America's entire national identity was \"We'll take you even if nobody else will\". It's only for the past sixty to seventy years that a growing political backlash against immigrants has become politically empowered enough to restrict immigration.\nI'm telling you, for all you anti-immigration folks' talk about how you like this country, you seem to like more the pale illusion of it in your head. And that's not even getting into the question of \"Who's the real immigrants in a country which has native Americans?\"" ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me.", ">\n\n\nHowever now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \n\nRight, the political point being that one side is anti-immigrant nativists who have extreme overlap with the racist elements in the nation, and the other side just treats them like normal people?\nIt should be easy to immigrate to America, that is the immigration policy under which we became the world's foremost economic powerhouse.", ">\n\nSo you think the right has either of our best interests at heart?! Stop with the us verses them mentality please. Have you compared how other developed nations in the world deal with citizenship and immigration?", ">\n\nI have, but I didn't find it particularly relevant, because America is not those countries. Our historical identity was practically formed on immigration and free trade, very reflective of the Netherlands during its glory days. The Dutch way of economics was a very strong component of the fabric of American identity, the idea that people should be able to trade and exist freely within the territory. While other countries closed themselves off and restricted who could enter, we accepted just about everyone. And for that we became the greatest economic powerhouse in world history. Until 9/11, and then we decided to start prosecuting illegal border crossers criminally instead of civilly. How have we been doing since then?\nImagine being a passenger on the MS St. Louis in 1939. You're Jewish, and you've managed to get all the way from Germany to the shores of America, along with 900 others. Then, you're informed that you'll have to turn around and seek asylum elsewhere, because the US won't take you. Imagine that. Now imagine a family fleeing cartel violence, showing up at the border, and being told to wait in line because right wing Americans think the country is \"too full\". History rhymes.", ">\n\nPolis is one of the most popular governors in the country and even he doesn't want to deal with the impacts of semi-open borders. I wonder when Congress will do something and why the Dems did not prioritize this when they controlled both Houses of Congress?", ">\n\nIf you think we have semi-open borders now, you must not take much pride in American history.", ">\n\n4M refugees or illegals have entered the country in the last two years.", ">\n\nYes, and we're only now just normalizing back to the level of immigrants we had back in the 1850's.\nYou think this is a lot because you don't understand that historically America's entire national identity was \"We'll take you even if nobody else will\". It's only for the past sixty to seventy years that a growing political backlash against immigrants has become politically empowered enough to restrict immigration.\nI'm telling you, for all you anti-immigration folks' talk about how you like this country, you seem to like more the pale illusion of it in your head. And that's not even getting into the question of \"Who's the real immigrants in a country which has native Americans?\"", ">\n\nSo what are your thoughts on immigration. How many immigrants should we take in each year?" ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me.", ">\n\n\nHowever now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \n\nRight, the political point being that one side is anti-immigrant nativists who have extreme overlap with the racist elements in the nation, and the other side just treats them like normal people?\nIt should be easy to immigrate to America, that is the immigration policy under which we became the world's foremost economic powerhouse.", ">\n\nSo you think the right has either of our best interests at heart?! Stop with the us verses them mentality please. Have you compared how other developed nations in the world deal with citizenship and immigration?", ">\n\nI have, but I didn't find it particularly relevant, because America is not those countries. Our historical identity was practically formed on immigration and free trade, very reflective of the Netherlands during its glory days. The Dutch way of economics was a very strong component of the fabric of American identity, the idea that people should be able to trade and exist freely within the territory. While other countries closed themselves off and restricted who could enter, we accepted just about everyone. And for that we became the greatest economic powerhouse in world history. Until 9/11, and then we decided to start prosecuting illegal border crossers criminally instead of civilly. How have we been doing since then?\nImagine being a passenger on the MS St. Louis in 1939. You're Jewish, and you've managed to get all the way from Germany to the shores of America, along with 900 others. Then, you're informed that you'll have to turn around and seek asylum elsewhere, because the US won't take you. Imagine that. Now imagine a family fleeing cartel violence, showing up at the border, and being told to wait in line because right wing Americans think the country is \"too full\". History rhymes.", ">\n\nPolis is one of the most popular governors in the country and even he doesn't want to deal with the impacts of semi-open borders. I wonder when Congress will do something and why the Dems did not prioritize this when they controlled both Houses of Congress?", ">\n\nIf you think we have semi-open borders now, you must not take much pride in American history.", ">\n\n4M refugees or illegals have entered the country in the last two years.", ">\n\nYes, and we're only now just normalizing back to the level of immigrants we had back in the 1850's.\nYou think this is a lot because you don't understand that historically America's entire national identity was \"We'll take you even if nobody else will\". It's only for the past sixty to seventy years that a growing political backlash against immigrants has become politically empowered enough to restrict immigration.\nI'm telling you, for all you anti-immigration folks' talk about how you like this country, you seem to like more the pale illusion of it in your head. And that's not even getting into the question of \"Who's the real immigrants in a country which has native Americans?\"", ">\n\nSo what are your thoughts on immigration. How many immigrants should we take in each year?", ">\n\nMy personal opinion is that immigrants and immigration are a financial boon, and that the test to become an American should be a simple criminal history check from country(s) of origin and a desire to immigrate. I actually want semi-open borders, so it's funny hearing people complain that we already have it." ]

[ "I saw a documentary about Colorado shipping homeless people to California years ago. Even had a song about it.", ">\n\nI remember when that kid used his skate board and jumped over at least 40 homeless", ">\n\nIt was 40 across, three tall.\n120 homeless total.", ">\n\nRelevant text:\n\nPolis announced on Jan. 3 that Colorado would facilitate in transporting of migrants who arrived in Denver to their \"final destinations,\" noting that about 70% of the migrants did not consider Denver as their destination. The release added that weather and workforce shortages at the time attributed to travel cancellations for many migrants.\nNew York Mayor Eric Adams had responded before Polis issued that announcement. Joining 77WABC's \"Sid and Friends in the Morning,\" Adams informed listeners that Polis notified him on Monday about busing migrants from Colorado.\n\"This is just unfair for local governments to have to take on this national obligation,\" Adams said. \"We've done our job. There's no more room at the end, but we are compelled by local laws here that we must provide shelter.\"\n\nSo yes, unlike with Abbot, Polis was literally facilitating these folks getting to where they were trying to go. But Republicans have to try to \"both sides\" with something, and this is the best they got.", ">\n\nMigrant: I'm heading to New York\nMayor of NYC: This is Colorado's fault", ">\n\nI moved from Co a few years ago, but this behavior seems weird from Polis. I get the struggle of having people and no resources, but I’m surprised to see he took this route.", ">\n\nYeah I’ve been asking around because I know quite a few people who are immigrants or work with immigrant communities, and it seems like these folks were unable to get to Chicago and NYC because transportation was a mess from the winter storm, but they wanted to go. It’s very different than kidnapping people like Abbott did. \nIf they were trying to get to other cities where they have family or friends, then chartering a bus to help them get there is a good thing. People are not going to need much assistance in the form of emergency shelters if they have community support at their destination.", ">\n\nYeah, I'm trying to point out the distinctions but I'm getting downvoted.", ">\n\nShouldn't those that support open borders enthusiastically support helping migrants reach their final destination? \nBecause if you don't then you actually don't support open borders. You're just supporting opening one border then hoping that the \"border\" of expenses/language barrier is closed keeping them from crossing the borders of your own city/county/state. \nIt is demeaning when some states trick people onto buses and do stunt dropoffs but in this case we're dealing with hypocrisy.", ">\n\nIn the words of Karl Marx in regard to 19th century Irish immigration to England:\n\nIreland constantly sends her own surplus to the English labor market, and thus forces down wages and lowers the material and moral position of the English working class.", ">\n\nThey didn't care about immigrants until they were on there doorstep, how ironic", ">\n\nDo you really think that NYC and Chicago don't get immigrants?", ">\n\nThe difference was they did it legally like my family did", ">\n\nConsidering the process has changed drastically since your family did it, maybe you should reconsider. After all criminal prosecutions for illegal border crossing didn't happen until 2004.\nImmigration law has drastically changed within our lifetimes, and become incredibly restrictive relative to what it was for the entirety of American history. For all the poeple decrying \"semi-open borders\" we have the most shut borders America has ever had in its history. And that's not even tackling the question of \"Was it even smart to change our immigration policy away from the one under which we became the world's foremost superpower, or were we just in shock from 9/11?\"", ">\n\nI'm actually quite familiar with the system. I know how expensive it is, how long it takes and that it needs an overhaul. I also know that the vast majority of Americans couldn't pass the test. However now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \nTo gain access to one of the greatest countries in the world you just have to claim asylum since Central America is in it's current state.\nI feel bad for them just as I do those that can't afford basic necessities. However we turn a blind eye to those already here and send aid and attention elsewhere which makes zero sense to me.", ">\n\n\nHowever now it has become a political point with sanctuary cities, locking people in cages, pandering to certain demographics, those seeking asylum or whatever other rhetoric you wish to include. \n\nRight, the political point being that one side is anti-immigrant nativists who have extreme overlap with the racist elements in the nation, and the other side just treats them like normal people?\nIt should be easy to immigrate to America, that is the immigration policy under which we became the world's foremost economic powerhouse.", ">\n\nSo you think the right has either of our best interests at heart?! Stop with the us verses them mentality please. Have you compared how other developed nations in the world deal with citizenship and immigration?", ">\n\nI have, but I didn't find it particularly relevant, because America is not those countries. Our historical identity was practically formed on immigration and free trade, very reflective of the Netherlands during its glory days. The Dutch way of economics was a very strong component of the fabric of American identity, the idea that people should be able to trade and exist freely within the territory. While other countries closed themselves off and restricted who could enter, we accepted just about everyone. And for that we became the greatest economic powerhouse in world history. Until 9/11, and then we decided to start prosecuting illegal border crossers criminally instead of civilly. How have we been doing since then?\nImagine being a passenger on the MS St. Louis in 1939. You're Jewish, and you've managed to get all the way from Germany to the shores of America, along with 900 others. Then, you're informed that you'll have to turn around and seek asylum elsewhere, because the US won't take you. Imagine that. Now imagine a family fleeing cartel violence, showing up at the border, and being told to wait in line because right wing Americans think the country is \"too full\". History rhymes.", ">\n\nPolis is one of the most popular governors in the country and even he doesn't want to deal with the impacts of semi-open borders. I wonder when Congress will do something and why the Dems did not prioritize this when they controlled both Houses of Congress?", ">\n\nIf you think we have semi-open borders now, you must not take much pride in American history.", ">\n\n4M refugees or illegals have entered the country in the last two years.", ">\n\nYes, and we're only now just normalizing back to the level of immigrants we had back in the 1850's.\nYou think this is a lot because you don't understand that historically America's entire national identity was \"We'll take you even if nobody else will\". It's only for the past sixty to seventy years that a growing political backlash against immigrants has become politically empowered enough to restrict immigration.\nI'm telling you, for all you anti-immigration folks' talk about how you like this country, you seem to like more the pale illusion of it in your head. And that's not even getting into the question of \"Who's the real immigrants in a country which has native Americans?\"", ">\n\nSo what are your thoughts on immigration. How many immigrants should we take in each year?", ">\n\nMy personal opinion is that immigrants and immigration are a financial boon, and that the test to become an American should be a simple criminal history check from country(s) of origin and a desire to immigrate. I actually want semi-open borders, so it's funny hearing people complain that we already have it.", ">\n\nRepublicans wouldn't have a problem with the \"open border\" if it wasn't brown people coming into the country." ]

[]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity)." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀", ">\n\nThis is such an uninformed opinion. Nobody thinks they look good because their mom said so. If anything, most people have extremely low self-esteem and constantly blow up their flaws." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀", ">\n\nThis is such an uninformed opinion. Nobody thinks they look good because their mom said so. If anything, most people have extremely low self-esteem and constantly blow up their flaws.", ">\n\nI have read that actually, most people rate themselves as more attractive than they are." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀", ">\n\nThis is such an uninformed opinion. Nobody thinks they look good because their mom said so. If anything, most people have extremely low self-esteem and constantly blow up their flaws.", ">\n\nI have read that actually, most people rate themselves as more attractive than they are.", ">\n\nAttractiveness is 100% subjective. They are exactly as attractive as they feel they are. Maybe not to everyone, but your opinion of their looks does not discredit their assessment." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀", ">\n\nThis is such an uninformed opinion. Nobody thinks they look good because their mom said so. If anything, most people have extremely low self-esteem and constantly blow up their flaws.", ">\n\nI have read that actually, most people rate themselves as more attractive than they are.", ">\n\nAttractiveness is 100% subjective. They are exactly as attractive as they feel they are. Maybe not to everyone, but your opinion of their looks does not discredit their assessment.", ">\n\nDo you really believe it’s 100% subjective? It definitely is quite subjective, but there’s a reason there’s a general consensus that some actors are really attractive and that traits like obesity are unattractive. Because they have some amount of objective attractiveness" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀", ">\n\nThis is such an uninformed opinion. Nobody thinks they look good because their mom said so. If anything, most people have extremely low self-esteem and constantly blow up their flaws.", ">\n\nI have read that actually, most people rate themselves as more attractive than they are.", ">\n\nAttractiveness is 100% subjective. They are exactly as attractive as they feel they are. Maybe not to everyone, but your opinion of their looks does not discredit their assessment.", ">\n\nDo you really believe it’s 100% subjective? It definitely is quite subjective, but there’s a reason there’s a general consensus that some actors are really attractive and that traits like obesity are unattractive. Because they have some amount of objective attractiveness", ">\n\nI would attribute that more to group think than anything else. Theres a general consensus, but you generally only get the opinions of people who care. How many people make up this general consensus...1000? 1 million? 300 million? Its subjective in that its how the person looking perceived it. If you find it attractive, it is. If I find the exact same thing unattractive, the same is also true. \nBeauty is in the eye of the beholder. Things like beauty exist only as YOU perceive them" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀", ">\n\nThis is such an uninformed opinion. Nobody thinks they look good because their mom said so. If anything, most people have extremely low self-esteem and constantly blow up their flaws.", ">\n\nI have read that actually, most people rate themselves as more attractive than they are.", ">\n\nAttractiveness is 100% subjective. They are exactly as attractive as they feel they are. Maybe not to everyone, but your opinion of their looks does not discredit their assessment.", ">\n\nDo you really believe it’s 100% subjective? It definitely is quite subjective, but there’s a reason there’s a general consensus that some actors are really attractive and that traits like obesity are unattractive. Because they have some amount of objective attractiveness", ">\n\nI would attribute that more to group think than anything else. Theres a general consensus, but you generally only get the opinions of people who care. How many people make up this general consensus...1000? 1 million? 300 million? Its subjective in that its how the person looking perceived it. If you find it attractive, it is. If I find the exact same thing unattractive, the same is also true. \nBeauty is in the eye of the beholder. Things like beauty exist only as YOU perceive them", ">\n\nDo you not believe the fact that we are a biological system with motivations given to us by this system? It's easy to abstract things out and imagine yourself as always at the helm of your motivations and decisions but we already know this isn't true. We don't prefer wide hips because of group think nor are we the only species with permanent breasts outside periods of lactation in all mammals on Earth because of group think and those are just 2 examples." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀", ">\n\nThis is such an uninformed opinion. Nobody thinks they look good because their mom said so. If anything, most people have extremely low self-esteem and constantly blow up their flaws.", ">\n\nI have read that actually, most people rate themselves as more attractive than they are.", ">\n\nAttractiveness is 100% subjective. They are exactly as attractive as they feel they are. Maybe not to everyone, but your opinion of their looks does not discredit their assessment.", ">\n\nDo you really believe it’s 100% subjective? It definitely is quite subjective, but there’s a reason there’s a general consensus that some actors are really attractive and that traits like obesity are unattractive. Because they have some amount of objective attractiveness", ">\n\nI would attribute that more to group think than anything else. Theres a general consensus, but you generally only get the opinions of people who care. How many people make up this general consensus...1000? 1 million? 300 million? Its subjective in that its how the person looking perceived it. If you find it attractive, it is. If I find the exact same thing unattractive, the same is also true. \nBeauty is in the eye of the beholder. Things like beauty exist only as YOU perceive them", ">\n\nDo you not believe the fact that we are a biological system with motivations given to us by this system? It's easy to abstract things out and imagine yourself as always at the helm of your motivations and decisions but we already know this isn't true. We don't prefer wide hips because of group think nor are we the only species with permanent breasts outside periods of lactation in all mammals on Earth because of group think and those are just 2 examples.", ">\n\nIf you look at history, you see how beauty standards changed A LOT during the different periods and in the different cultures. This is a big proof that it has a lot to do with \"group think\"" ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀", ">\n\nThis is such an uninformed opinion. Nobody thinks they look good because their mom said so. If anything, most people have extremely low self-esteem and constantly blow up their flaws.", ">\n\nI have read that actually, most people rate themselves as more attractive than they are.", ">\n\nAttractiveness is 100% subjective. They are exactly as attractive as they feel they are. Maybe not to everyone, but your opinion of their looks does not discredit their assessment.", ">\n\nDo you really believe it’s 100% subjective? It definitely is quite subjective, but there’s a reason there’s a general consensus that some actors are really attractive and that traits like obesity are unattractive. Because they have some amount of objective attractiveness", ">\n\nI would attribute that more to group think than anything else. Theres a general consensus, but you generally only get the opinions of people who care. How many people make up this general consensus...1000? 1 million? 300 million? Its subjective in that its how the person looking perceived it. If you find it attractive, it is. If I find the exact same thing unattractive, the same is also true. \nBeauty is in the eye of the beholder. Things like beauty exist only as YOU perceive them", ">\n\nDo you not believe the fact that we are a biological system with motivations given to us by this system? It's easy to abstract things out and imagine yourself as always at the helm of your motivations and decisions but we already know this isn't true. We don't prefer wide hips because of group think nor are we the only species with permanent breasts outside periods of lactation in all mammals on Earth because of group think and those are just 2 examples.", ">\n\nIf you look at history, you see how beauty standards changed A LOT during the different periods and in the different cultures. This is a big proof that it has a lot to do with \"group think\"", ">\n\nActually historical beauty standards don't say much about the real beauty standards people had before, because most of history is from point of view of a quite distinct slice of society. We may never know for real what average European found attractive in 1300s." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀", ">\n\nThis is such an uninformed opinion. Nobody thinks they look good because their mom said so. If anything, most people have extremely low self-esteem and constantly blow up their flaws.", ">\n\nI have read that actually, most people rate themselves as more attractive than they are.", ">\n\nAttractiveness is 100% subjective. They are exactly as attractive as they feel they are. Maybe not to everyone, but your opinion of their looks does not discredit their assessment.", ">\n\nDo you really believe it’s 100% subjective? It definitely is quite subjective, but there’s a reason there’s a general consensus that some actors are really attractive and that traits like obesity are unattractive. Because they have some amount of objective attractiveness", ">\n\nI would attribute that more to group think than anything else. Theres a general consensus, but you generally only get the opinions of people who care. How many people make up this general consensus...1000? 1 million? 300 million? Its subjective in that its how the person looking perceived it. If you find it attractive, it is. If I find the exact same thing unattractive, the same is also true. \nBeauty is in the eye of the beholder. Things like beauty exist only as YOU perceive them", ">\n\nDo you not believe the fact that we are a biological system with motivations given to us by this system? It's easy to abstract things out and imagine yourself as always at the helm of your motivations and decisions but we already know this isn't true. We don't prefer wide hips because of group think nor are we the only species with permanent breasts outside periods of lactation in all mammals on Earth because of group think and those are just 2 examples.", ">\n\nIf you look at history, you see how beauty standards changed A LOT during the different periods and in the different cultures. This is a big proof that it has a lot to do with \"group think\"", ">\n\nActually historical beauty standards don't say much about the real beauty standards people had before, because most of history is from point of view of a quite distinct slice of society. We may never know for real what average European found attractive in 1300s.", ">\n\nI don’t want to meet the parent that does not think their children are absolutely beautiful. My kids may not be lookers in other peoples eyes, but they are absolutely beautiful to me - hands down the best looking kids on the planet and I would not change a thing." ]

[ "Never base childs confidence on his/hers looks which they did nothing to earn them, that's not a strong base, base on character. On the other hand, no matter how your child looks, he/she should be comfortable in their looks, certainly don't feel ugly, even if they don't meet \"the criteria\" which is subjective.", ">\n\nPssst... you're going to get old and wrinkly one day. \nLife doesn't care what you want. With your current outlook, you'd better hope that you stay lucky enough to avoid accidents/tragedies that impact your face. Car accidents, tumors, building collapses, a new autoimmune problem, a stray transport tire, a fire, a falling object, etc can all happen to you unexpectedly. You won't magically be safe from them just because you dislike ugly people.\nI hope they don't happen to you, but you'd currently be screwed if it does happen, based on your response. Would you lose all of your self-worth, or would you try to find other things to be proud of? Your attitude implies the former, which is not good. I hope that you have other things that you are proud of. If you don't, you should try to find some, even if it's a hobby. No one is good at everything, but everyone is good at something.\nETA: A bad personality/attitude can easily make a \"10\" into a \"2\". Life's way too short to deal with people who prefer judging over self-improvement. You can't guarantee that you'll see tomorrow.", ">\n\nThe wise need not dwell on the opinions of the foolish", ">\n\nIf you are the parent of a 500 lb minor, you deserve to be in prison for child endangerment (unless there’s some medical reason for the extreme obesity).", ">\n\nThere is only one extremely rare disease that makes hunger continuous that would count as an excuse. Other than that, no other disease makes you eat in a caloric surplus.", ">\n\nAntipsychotic medications can make people insatiable. Some kids need them. \nBut yeah, Prader-Willi syndrome is as real as it is rare.", ">\n\nThat's what parents are for. No kid will starve to death and die from an increased appetite that's regulated by the parents. But they will die from obesity.", ">\n\nI believe that parents should not emphasize/place a lot of importance on/ mention frequently their child's physical appearance in any context, whether the child is above average, average, or below average in looks. So I agree that parents should not tell an unattractive child that he or she is physically beautiful, but they should also not tell an attractive child he or she is beautiful, either.", ">\n\nI'd extend this to say you shouldn't overvalue any trait that is outside of the kids control. \nMy generation is full of former \"smart\" kids who burnt out and failed as soon as they hit a roadblock at least in part because we were constantly told how smart we were when our school work wasn't challenging. As soon as we did get challenged for the first time, suddenly we must not be \"smart\" anymore, we had no idea how to overcome an obstacle, and the whole foundation fell out beneath us. \nKids who are rewarded for being hard working, or creative, or good problem solvers, have much better short term and long term outcomes than kids who are just told they're smart. I'd say the same goes for any other inherent trait vs one the kid can actually control", ">\n\nThere’s a difference between teaching your child how much appearance matters (which is necessary), and being harmful by degrading them. Attractiveness is a factor in everything.\nThe vast majority of people who think they’re ugly are very capable of elevating themselves to at least a 5/10. Yes, some people simply lost the lottery, and some people simply won the lottery when it comes to genetics. But most people were born somewhere in the middle, and their choices have led to their appearance.\nSo what I’m saying is, the importance of keeping yourself up should be taught, regardless of how naturally attractive you are. Far too many people fall into the trap of thinking they always have been and always will be ugly no matter what.", ">\n\nExactly this. I see so many ugly people who you can tell have just given up, they don't even do the basics like combing their hair or wearing clothes that don't look like they got them from a bin. \nIt's not hard for someone to take a little bit of time to tidy up their appearance but instead, we have this new 'movement' which is seeking to remove all notions of standards which essentially says, everyone is beautiful no matter what. This leads to people not doing a damn thing with their appearance and thinking they are attractive.\nAnyone see footage from the 50s when people used to dress nicely when they were in public? This idea should be the standard expectation of people in public. But now for some reason, shame and dignity have been removed from the equation and we see people in their damn pyjamas at the supermarket.", ">\n\nThe supermarket? You should see how people dress in the office. You'd think half of them just came in from weeding the garden. But most people don't subscribe to the idea that apparances are important any longer.", ">\n\nFriend visited me after the pandemic started to wind down. She didn't change or shower the entire time. Pijamas the entiretime. It was soooo disgusting. She was lazy and selfish and on her phone the entire time. She never used to be like this. Ive seen a lot of these slides for a lot of people, I think the pandemic fucked things up in lasting ways. It's so dramatic to see evidence of this everywhere, especially with how people dress and their hygiene.", ">\n\nObviously off topic to the thread, but I do think you're correct in that Covid has really changed attitudes and behavoirs accross the board. Half of it doesn't even make sense. But we didn't come out on the other side any better off for it, that's for certain. People are messed up.", ">\n\nThis is silly, because confidence is fantastic and ugly confident people succeed all the time. The problem in your scenario is if a child weighs 500 lbs, their parents have already failed them anyway and they aren’t listening to this type of advice.", ">\n\nIf a child weighs 500 lbs, they are not ugly, they are just fat af and they need to lose weight immediately.", ">\n\nDon’t be fat and ugly, just be ugly!", ">\n\nIt’s called pick your struggle. Like don’t be broke and ugly", ">\n\nParents think their kids are the closest thing to perfection. Guess it’s a biological mechanism, to ensure unconditional love.\nA friend of mine wanted to sign up her daughter at a modeling agency when she was 3 because she thought she was so beautiful. No one else I knew seemed to agree, we just nodded and remained silent.", ">\n\nOld enough to remember “it’s the inside is what counts,” a way healthier and honest message than “everyone is beautiful.”", ">\n\nIt’s so frustrating seeing how a movement that was meant to be about how “everybody/every body is worthy of basic respect and dignity even if you don’t find them attractive” became “everybody/every body is beautiful” because why address the problem at hand that beauty is equated to self worth when you can launch thousands of ad campaigns to capitalize on people’s insecurities.", ">\n\nDude creates an alt just to make this post", ">\n\nGot turned down by a fat girl huh?", ">\n\n💀", ">\n\nThis is such an uninformed opinion. Nobody thinks they look good because their mom said so. If anything, most people have extremely low self-esteem and constantly blow up their flaws.", ">\n\nI have read that actually, most people rate themselves as more attractive than they are.", ">\n\nAttractiveness is 100% subjective. They are exactly as attractive as they feel they are. Maybe not to everyone, but your opinion of their looks does not discredit their assessment.", ">\n\nDo you really believe it’s 100% subjective? It definitely is quite subjective, but there’s a reason there’s a general consensus that some actors are really attractive and that traits like obesity are unattractive. Because they have some amount of objective attractiveness", ">\n\nI would attribute that more to group think than anything else. Theres a general consensus, but you generally only get the opinions of people who care. How many people make up this general consensus...1000? 1 million? 300 million? Its subjective in that its how the person looking perceived it. If you find it attractive, it is. If I find the exact same thing unattractive, the same is also true. \nBeauty is in the eye of the beholder. Things like beauty exist only as YOU perceive them", ">\n\nDo you not believe the fact that we are a biological system with motivations given to us by this system? It's easy to abstract things out and imagine yourself as always at the helm of your motivations and decisions but we already know this isn't true. We don't prefer wide hips because of group think nor are we the only species with permanent breasts outside periods of lactation in all mammals on Earth because of group think and those are just 2 examples.", ">\n\nIf you look at history, you see how beauty standards changed A LOT during the different periods and in the different cultures. This is a big proof that it has a lot to do with \"group think\"", ">\n\nActually historical beauty standards don't say much about the real beauty standards people had before, because most of history is from point of view of a quite distinct slice of society. We may never know for real what average European found attractive in 1300s.", ">\n\nI don’t want to meet the parent that does not think their children are absolutely beautiful. My kids may not be lookers in other peoples eyes, but they are absolutely beautiful to me - hands down the best looking kids on the planet and I would not change a thing.", ">\n\nI feel this.\nI don't feel like either her dad or I are objectively mainstream attractive. \nBut daaammmnnnn, my baby got the best of both of us." ]