Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset1

like 0

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever.", ">\n\nMusk tried to make a far right platform, he succeeded..." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever.", ">\n\nMusk tried to make a far right platform, he succeeded...", ">\n\nHow else would we know we're being threatened by the real taliban leader?" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever.", ">\n\nMusk tried to make a far right platform, he succeeded...", ">\n\nHow else would we know we're being threatened by the real taliban leader?", ">\n\n\"DRUG CARTEL\" starts buying . . ." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever.", ">\n\nMusk tried to make a far right platform, he succeeded...", ">\n\nHow else would we know we're being threatened by the real taliban leader?", ">\n\n\"DRUG CARTEL\" starts buying . . .", ">\n\nI heard it was $11 now" ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever.", ">\n\nMusk tried to make a far right platform, he succeeded...", ">\n\nHow else would we know we're being threatened by the real taliban leader?", ">\n\n\"DRUG CARTEL\" starts buying . . .", ">\n\nI heard it was $11 now", ">\n\nReinforces my general rule that anyone who has a paid blue check on their Twitter account is automatically to be ignored." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever.", ">\n\nMusk tried to make a far right platform, he succeeded...", ">\n\nHow else would we know we're being threatened by the real taliban leader?", ">\n\n\"DRUG CARTEL\" starts buying . . .", ">\n\nI heard it was $11 now", ">\n\nReinforces my general rule that anyone who has a paid blue check on their Twitter account is automatically to be ignored.", ">\n\nI thought they were buying dogs." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever.", ">\n\nMusk tried to make a far right platform, he succeeded...", ">\n\nHow else would we know we're being threatened by the real taliban leader?", ">\n\n\"DRUG CARTEL\" starts buying . . .", ">\n\nI heard it was $11 now", ">\n\nReinforces my general rule that anyone who has a paid blue check on their Twitter account is automatically to be ignored.", ">\n\nI thought they were buying dogs.", ">\n\nThis is a good thing. They can spend their money and then get their accounts banned anyway. Better than making unlimited numbers of sockpuppet accounts for free." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever.", ">\n\nMusk tried to make a far right platform, he succeeded...", ">\n\nHow else would we know we're being threatened by the real taliban leader?", ">\n\n\"DRUG CARTEL\" starts buying . . .", ">\n\nI heard it was $11 now", ">\n\nReinforces my general rule that anyone who has a paid blue check on their Twitter account is automatically to be ignored.", ">\n\nI thought they were buying dogs.", ">\n\nThis is a good thing. They can spend their money and then get their accounts banned anyway. Better than making unlimited numbers of sockpuppet accounts for free.", ">\n\nI'm surprised that Elon is not giving them out to known terrorists for free." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever.", ">\n\nMusk tried to make a far right platform, he succeeded...", ">\n\nHow else would we know we're being threatened by the real taliban leader?", ">\n\n\"DRUG CARTEL\" starts buying . . .", ">\n\nI heard it was $11 now", ">\n\nReinforces my general rule that anyone who has a paid blue check on their Twitter account is automatically to be ignored.", ">\n\nI thought they were buying dogs.", ">\n\nThis is a good thing. They can spend their money and then get their accounts banned anyway. Better than making unlimited numbers of sockpuppet accounts for free.", ">\n\nI'm surprised that Elon is not giving them out to known terrorists for free.", ">\n\nTook me a minute to figure out they weren’t taking about hounds." ]

[ "\"Elon Musk Funded by Terrorists\"", ">\n\nTechnically you are now more correct than when it was just Truth Social and the refugees from Parlor.", ">\n\nDomestic vs international.", ">\n\nYes.\nThere are Q-Trumpists in India. In India! WTF do they get out of some used car dealer who may not even be able to find them on a map?", ">\n\nAs an Indian I’ve never understood it either. It’s one of the strangest phenomena ever.", ">\n\nI just heard about it recently. Are these people similar to the Q in the USA or are they some unique manifestation only India could produce?\nI have a feeling this is part of a social media manipulation and that it’s a world wide push to organize all the angry paranoid people.", ">\n\n\"Thanks for the eight bucks.\" He said.", ">\n\nPer month, per account: he'll make back that lost $200 billion in no time.", ">\n\nNit: The buyout price for Twitter was $43 billion.", ">\n\nThe nit where, in context, the relevant comparison would be to the cost of twitter. If you weren’t using that as the baseline, as would be natural, you can just say, “I was comparing to Musk’s personal loss of net worth” instead of making me read a link to untangle what you mean.", ">\n\nHe lost all that money because he bought Twitter: that is Twitter's true cost of ownership.", ">\n\nThat’s not the right way to account for it. It’s one party’s loss because of semi related events. Not everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.", ">\n\n\nNot everyone who participated in the twitter purchase suffered a share of the $200 bn loss, only of the $43 bn loss.\n\nYou are wrong, since every everyone who paid $44 billion to own Twitter also lost a total of $200 billion.", ">\n\nNobody paid $44 bn. It was jointly financed across multiple parties.\nAnd even if Musk had out put up $44 bn, it doesn’t mean the other losses were attributable solely to that purchase. The Tesla price fluctuations were not entirely due to the sale of Musk’s shares, for example.", ">\n\nIt took me a few to realize they weren't talking about hound dogs.", ">\n\nFor me it was; \"They crave the Lyme disease?\" For about 24.3 seconds.", ">\n\nYou might think more clearly if you don't track the completion time of your thoughts to the 10th of a second.", ">\n\nOh, so you think Chat GPT and Google Search are less clear than you who tracks thoughts on your weekly calendar a month in advance?\n\"Tuesday the 5th,... Today I had a thought, which I shall let gestate for a day or so, until it has mellowed.\"", ">\n\nHaha, I don't even know what day it is!", ">\n\nIt looks like Musk has found a way to please that sought-after Taliban and scam marketers looking for legitimacy demographic.", ">\n\nHey, don't forget \"Nazis seeking to spread their ideology via social media\". The dude was VERY happy to unban prominent white supremacists so that they too can buy the checkmark and gain legitimacy on twitter", ">\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected. Once he puts people in office, and they know his finger on the scales of \"freedom and truth\" helps them get into office. He hopes to make his money back on super lucrative government contracts.\n\"What is this man's genius and reason for a comeback?\" Everyone will say in shock and hushed tones. He's a piece of shit who will help other pieces of shit get in power and they will help him in return. Getting contracts and financing is his one and perhaps only genius talent.\nYou know, because that's what humanity needs; one more pig at the trough making sure that they get fed. It's so transparent. The future is as stupid as it is predictable and annoying.\nThe solution of course, is someone needs to put LSD in his smoothie one day, so that he can experience true wonder and stop being a selfish prick.", ">\n\n\nI am still about 90% sure that Musk bought Twitter so that he could use it to manipulate who gets elected.\n\nThe illusion of his power comes from his wealth, and the reputation for turning everything he touches into a success. He's lost half that net worth, and will lose more with the Tesla lawsuit. Twitter has been such a big failure, it's seriously screwed his other company's. Don't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.", ">\n\n\nDon't get me wrong, I thought the same thing, but musk just doesn't have the influence to play King Maker anymore.\n\nWell, it is a roll of the dice. It's not that he isn't TRYING to play king maker and I do hope he fails. However, these people at the top have a tendency to fail upwards. Rupert Murdoch was in the red with Fox News for over a decade -- they paid more for each audience member than they got (paying to get their channel in venues and more than giving it away). Now it makes a profit -- but, it really makes its value by the reality it creates in people's heads. It promotes fascism and props up candidates who work against the working class.\nSo, who is to say that in two years, Musk doesn't look like a genius with new contracts? Because sometimes, it's not about the money -- it's about convincing people to put the chain around their own necks. That's necessary until the vote can be rigged and they can get the pesky democracy part out of the way.", ">\n\nYou know Elon, this “free speech” you talk about, should actually be reserved for countries that have free speech. \nYou know, it’s always acceptable to tell oppressive terrorists to shove their heads up their asses!", ">\n\nLol you should see how much he adores China", ">\n\nWonder how long it takes the Taliban to get Talibanned", ">\n\nNever.", ">\n\nI’m… pretty sure it’s like super mega illegal to deal financially with them.", ">\n\nhold me beer - elon muskrat", ">\n\nDoes this mean for $8/month I can be Muhammad The Prophet with a blue tick?\nWill I be jihadi'd if I upload a profile picture?", ">\n\nTest drive that!", ">\n\nI would but I'm too worried they'd find out I lived at Mar-A-Lago!", ">\n\nElon loves anybody who's got the money to pay him", ">\n\nWell, let's not single him out on that bit.", ">\n\nAnd how is Musk going to take payment from them when they remain sanctioned by the US?", ">\n\nWith free speech and hashtags. Also, by breaking the law.", ">\n\nCan't make this shit up folks", ">\n\nOh look more incels on Twitter!", ">\n\nCan you really call them incels when they're fucking over their entire country?", ">\n\nTaliban lambo", ">\n\nIt's like the Wolf Cola episode from Always Sunny In Philadelphia but with Elon", ">\n\nTaliban and GOP", ">\n\nThey should have made them pink.", ">\n\ntime to troll the taliban", ">\n\nElon: \"Nice\"", ">\n\nWait you're doxing the Taliban. Sarcasm.", ">\n\nhow long until theyre talibanned amirite guys", ">\n\nSo what's the difference? I don't see TweeLon doing big positive philosophy work with his money. Just how \"right\" he is on all topics.", ">\n\nThey'll get banned as soon as they'll tweet that their new car is better than Tesla.", ">\n\nThis should really help attract more advertisers to the platform.", ">\n\nWell hell, why not? The GOP is a terrorist organization and they all have blue checks too.", ">\n\nI bought blue balls on onlyfans", ">\n\nHow does that make sense?", ">\n\nDo you understand what \"blue balls\" means? As in, a bloke that's been sexually excited and is left with aching balls due to not ejaculating... and thus they are joking they got blue balls after spending money on onlyfans which is sexually provocative.", ">\n\nI do. Why would you buy pornography from OnlyFans and not ejaculate to it? If anything, this would be a cure for blue balls: it wouldn't induce it.", ">\n\nIt's a self-deprecating joke.", ">\n\nHow?", ">\n\nThey can also buy from Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and open an account on Reddit.", ">\n\nWhy did you post this comment?", ">\n\nBecause I can.", ">\n\nYou can also post useful comments that lead to meaningful discussion or that are clever.", ">\n\nMusk tried to make a far right platform, he succeeded...", ">\n\nHow else would we know we're being threatened by the real taliban leader?", ">\n\n\"DRUG CARTEL\" starts buying . . .", ">\n\nI heard it was $11 now", ">\n\nReinforces my general rule that anyone who has a paid blue check on their Twitter account is automatically to be ignored.", ">\n\nI thought they were buying dogs.", ">\n\nThis is a good thing. They can spend their money and then get their accounts banned anyway. Better than making unlimited numbers of sockpuppet accounts for free.", ">\n\nI'm surprised that Elon is not giving them out to known terrorists for free.", ">\n\nTook me a minute to figure out they weren’t taking about hounds.", ">\n\nWhen they start beheading blue tick users, Elon will be piiiiiiisssed!" ]

[]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\"." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!" ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat" ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this.", ">\n\nYou should judge a book by its cover. Often on the back, either the summary or reviews from publishers is there." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this.", ">\n\nYou should judge a book by its cover. Often on the back, either the summary or reviews from publishers is there.", ">\n\nHave you ever seen a bad one? These summaries are up to no good, just to sell the book." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this.", ">\n\nYou should judge a book by its cover. Often on the back, either the summary or reviews from publishers is there.", ">\n\nHave you ever seen a bad one? These summaries are up to no good, just to sell the book.", ">\n\nI believe goosebumps is intentionally vague with their summaries so yeah" ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this.", ">\n\nYou should judge a book by its cover. Often on the back, either the summary or reviews from publishers is there.", ">\n\nHave you ever seen a bad one? These summaries are up to no good, just to sell the book.", ">\n\nI believe goosebumps is intentionally vague with their summaries so yeah", ">\n\nCovers were meant to protect the pages. Anything beyond that, such as artwork, is just a modern bonus." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this.", ">\n\nYou should judge a book by its cover. Often on the back, either the summary or reviews from publishers is there.", ">\n\nHave you ever seen a bad one? These summaries are up to no good, just to sell the book.", ">\n\nI believe goosebumps is intentionally vague with their summaries so yeah", ">\n\nCovers were meant to protect the pages. Anything beyond that, such as artwork, is just a modern bonus.", ">\n\nFirst impressions\nThey matter but they aren't the entire picture. \nA picture is a 1000 words but books have 50-70+ thousand words." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this.", ">\n\nYou should judge a book by its cover. Often on the back, either the summary or reviews from publishers is there.", ">\n\nHave you ever seen a bad one? These summaries are up to no good, just to sell the book.", ">\n\nI believe goosebumps is intentionally vague with their summaries so yeah", ">\n\nCovers were meant to protect the pages. Anything beyond that, such as artwork, is just a modern bonus.", ">\n\nFirst impressions\nThey matter but they aren't the entire picture. \nA picture is a 1000 words but books have 50-70+ thousand words.", ">\n\nThis saying gets used wrong a lot of times, a cover should decide whether or not to read a book but not if the book is any good, I think that's what the sayings trying to say." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this.", ">\n\nYou should judge a book by its cover. Often on the back, either the summary or reviews from publishers is there.", ">\n\nHave you ever seen a bad one? These summaries are up to no good, just to sell the book.", ">\n\nI believe goosebumps is intentionally vague with their summaries so yeah", ">\n\nCovers were meant to protect the pages. Anything beyond that, such as artwork, is just a modern bonus.", ">\n\nFirst impressions\nThey matter but they aren't the entire picture. \nA picture is a 1000 words but books have 50-70+ thousand words.", ">\n\nThis saying gets used wrong a lot of times, a cover should decide whether or not to read a book but not if the book is any good, I think that's what the sayings trying to say.", ">\n\nThe saying is basically just an argument to consumers to look beyond biased human tendencies. It’s not addressing designers or marketers, who know that most people are inevitably not capable of truly considering, let alone following, such advice. At least not in the long run on average." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this.", ">\n\nYou should judge a book by its cover. Often on the back, either the summary or reviews from publishers is there.", ">\n\nHave you ever seen a bad one? These summaries are up to no good, just to sell the book.", ">\n\nI believe goosebumps is intentionally vague with their summaries so yeah", ">\n\nCovers were meant to protect the pages. Anything beyond that, such as artwork, is just a modern bonus.", ">\n\nFirst impressions\nThey matter but they aren't the entire picture. \nA picture is a 1000 words but books have 50-70+ thousand words.", ">\n\nThis saying gets used wrong a lot of times, a cover should decide whether or not to read a book but not if the book is any good, I think that's what the sayings trying to say.", ">\n\nThe saying is basically just an argument to consumers to look beyond biased human tendencies. It’s not addressing designers or marketers, who know that most people are inevitably not capable of truly considering, let alone following, such advice. At least not in the long run on average.", ">\n\nIt's a euphemism for not judging people by their looks and clothing." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this.", ">\n\nYou should judge a book by its cover. Often on the back, either the summary or reviews from publishers is there.", ">\n\nHave you ever seen a bad one? These summaries are up to no good, just to sell the book.", ">\n\nI believe goosebumps is intentionally vague with their summaries so yeah", ">\n\nCovers were meant to protect the pages. Anything beyond that, such as artwork, is just a modern bonus.", ">\n\nFirst impressions\nThey matter but they aren't the entire picture. \nA picture is a 1000 words but books have 50-70+ thousand words.", ">\n\nThis saying gets used wrong a lot of times, a cover should decide whether or not to read a book but not if the book is any good, I think that's what the sayings trying to say.", ">\n\nThe saying is basically just an argument to consumers to look beyond biased human tendencies. It’s not addressing designers or marketers, who know that most people are inevitably not capable of truly considering, let alone following, such advice. At least not in the long run on average.", ">\n\nIt's a euphemism for not judging people by their looks and clothing.", ">\n\nBut it's still true. Some covers are like \"graphic design is my passion,\" but the writing in the book is by some literary genius." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nThey say don't judge a book by it's cover, but they also say a picture paints more than a 1000 words.", ">\n\nNo, they don't. They say a picture paints a thousand words. No one says \"a picture paints more than a one thousand words\".", ">\n\nA thousand words and not one more!", ">\n\nBut isn't that kind of a meta argument? Because the cover designers know the saying, too? An infinite loop of trying to sell books by their covers to people who are told to do the opposite, only to come up with new schemes of color, etc, to attract eyes. And then repeat", ">\n\nWe, as people, are generally irrational. Just because we know we shouldn’t do something doesn’t mean we won’t do that thing. There’s obvious traps that people fall for all of the time. So ideally, one would think because we know this quote, we should live according to it. But often times we don’t, despite knowing it.", ">\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore 🤦‍♂️\nBut yes, that is the point of a cover, which is why the phrase exists so people don't get drawn in by a good cover and end up reading a bad book or get put off from a good book just because of a bad cover...\n\"Don't trust a salesperson\" is another example where you shouldn't listen to them and make a decision based on just what they say because that is the whole purpose of a salesperson.\nI think you must misunderstand the phrase.", ">\n\n\nThis is another repost... don't people have original thoughts anymore\n\nDo you really think that with the entirety of human history, that you've ever had an \"original thought?\" This phrase, it bugs me more than someone reposting something. Most thoughts now days aren't original. Even less so are thoughts that come to you while doing a routine (i.e. a \"shower thought\"). Most shower thoughts aren't original, because, we just aren't that original anymore. We think in derivatives of other people's words and in our experiences, everything we know, we've been taught by someone. Unless you're a top scientist breaking through new technologies your thoughts probably aren't that original, even less so are your \"shower thoughts.\"\n​\n/rant.", ">\n\nWell, all posts must be original and must be a shower\"thought\" so if you are correct, then every single post on here breaks the rules.\nIt all depends on exactly how you define \"original thought\". If you focus specifically on the actual thought rather than the general idea of the thought, then I do think it's possible more people have had original thoughts than you think.", ">\n\nI thought it was, \"You can't always judge a book by its cover.\"\nWhich makes perfect sense. A cover should give you a glimpse of the story to come, but it's purpose is also to sell the book, so it might not accurately display the book contents. Or the book designer never read the book, who knows.", ">\n\nPerhaps the purpose of the cover is to deceive buyers into buying the book.", ">\n\nWhole purpose of cover is to cover the fragile content not to give someone something to judge by.", ">\n\nSure does! But that doesn't mean you can't appreciate a good cover design - it's the first thing you notice after all. And if it catches your eye, it could be worth taking a closer look at what's inside.", ">\n\nFunny how it’s such a common phrase but few of us ever realise this.", ">\n\nYou should judge a book by its cover. Often on the back, either the summary or reviews from publishers is there.", ">\n\nHave you ever seen a bad one? These summaries are up to no good, just to sell the book.", ">\n\nI believe goosebumps is intentionally vague with their summaries so yeah", ">\n\nCovers were meant to protect the pages. Anything beyond that, such as artwork, is just a modern bonus.", ">\n\nFirst impressions\nThey matter but they aren't the entire picture. \nA picture is a 1000 words but books have 50-70+ thousand words.", ">\n\nThis saying gets used wrong a lot of times, a cover should decide whether or not to read a book but not if the book is any good, I think that's what the sayings trying to say.", ">\n\nThe saying is basically just an argument to consumers to look beyond biased human tendencies. It’s not addressing designers or marketers, who know that most people are inevitably not capable of truly considering, let alone following, such advice. At least not in the long run on average.", ">\n\nIt's a euphemism for not judging people by their looks and clothing.", ">\n\nBut it's still true. Some covers are like \"graphic design is my passion,\" but the writing in the book is by some literary genius.", ">\n\n\"'Don't smoke tobacco' defeats the whole purpose of tobacco!\"\nOkay, and?" ]

[]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans." ]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans.", ">\n\nI feel like you have part of an idea, but it isn't fully formed." ]