Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset1

like 0

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?" ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?", ">\n\nIt means the left will continue to lose if dem leadership can’t meet people where they are." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?", ">\n\nIt means the left will continue to lose if dem leadership can’t meet people where they are.", ">\n\nContinuing to lose implies that there have been notable recent losses. The last 3 elections cycles were very good for the democrats." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?", ">\n\nIt means the left will continue to lose if dem leadership can’t meet people where they are.", ">\n\nContinuing to lose implies that there have been notable recent losses. The last 3 elections cycles were very good for the democrats.", ">\n\nBut they can’t pass legislation. We’ll see about 2024. But if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach. Even when they did have the majority NP blocked a bill banning stock trading that voters on both sides support." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?", ">\n\nIt means the left will continue to lose if dem leadership can’t meet people where they are.", ">\n\nContinuing to lose implies that there have been notable recent losses. The last 3 elections cycles were very good for the democrats.", ">\n\nBut they can’t pass legislation. We’ll see about 2024. But if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach. Even when they did have the majority NP blocked a bill banning stock trading that voters on both sides support.", ">\n\nRight now they can't, which sucks, but politically they are still doing quite well. The reason they lost the house beyond the normal midterm bias against incumbent majorities had quite a bit to do with gerrymandering. Thats why they were able to slightly expand their senate lead (where gerrymandering can't effect things) despite losing the house by a few seats.\n\nBut if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach\n\nWell, if you want to look back on how we achieved a supermajority back in 2008 it was because the party had a platform that was more centrist than it is today and they invested in running conservative \"blue dog\" democrats in red states. So yes, there's certainly an clear evidence that the party can do better electorally by more directly shunning progressive candidates and more openly embracing and financing conservative candidates.\nBut somehow I don't think that's what you mean, is it?\nI'm certainly up for the democrats trying to do things better but any analysis that doesn't take into account a realistic assessment of the right-leaning electorate in the country which consistently disproves polling about issues with their votes is not being realistic." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?", ">\n\nIt means the left will continue to lose if dem leadership can’t meet people where they are.", ">\n\nContinuing to lose implies that there have been notable recent losses. The last 3 elections cycles were very good for the democrats.", ">\n\nBut they can’t pass legislation. We’ll see about 2024. But if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach. Even when they did have the majority NP blocked a bill banning stock trading that voters on both sides support.", ">\n\nRight now they can't, which sucks, but politically they are still doing quite well. The reason they lost the house beyond the normal midterm bias against incumbent majorities had quite a bit to do with gerrymandering. Thats why they were able to slightly expand their senate lead (where gerrymandering can't effect things) despite losing the house by a few seats.\n\nBut if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach\n\nWell, if you want to look back on how we achieved a supermajority back in 2008 it was because the party had a platform that was more centrist than it is today and they invested in running conservative \"blue dog\" democrats in red states. So yes, there's certainly an clear evidence that the party can do better electorally by more directly shunning progressive candidates and more openly embracing and financing conservative candidates.\nBut somehow I don't think that's what you mean, is it?\nI'm certainly up for the democrats trying to do things better but any analysis that doesn't take into account a realistic assessment of the right-leaning electorate in the country which consistently disproves polling about issues with their votes is not being realistic.", ">\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016. I don’t think running centrists in red states is the answer. What I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike. Child tax credit, universal pre-k, parental leave, things like that. If BBB had passed I thinks dems would have done a lot better in the midterms and maybe even held onto the house." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?", ">\n\nIt means the left will continue to lose if dem leadership can’t meet people where they are.", ">\n\nContinuing to lose implies that there have been notable recent losses. The last 3 elections cycles were very good for the democrats.", ">\n\nBut they can’t pass legislation. We’ll see about 2024. But if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach. Even when they did have the majority NP blocked a bill banning stock trading that voters on both sides support.", ">\n\nRight now they can't, which sucks, but politically they are still doing quite well. The reason they lost the house beyond the normal midterm bias against incumbent majorities had quite a bit to do with gerrymandering. Thats why they were able to slightly expand their senate lead (where gerrymandering can't effect things) despite losing the house by a few seats.\n\nBut if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach\n\nWell, if you want to look back on how we achieved a supermajority back in 2008 it was because the party had a platform that was more centrist than it is today and they invested in running conservative \"blue dog\" democrats in red states. So yes, there's certainly an clear evidence that the party can do better electorally by more directly shunning progressive candidates and more openly embracing and financing conservative candidates.\nBut somehow I don't think that's what you mean, is it?\nI'm certainly up for the democrats trying to do things better but any analysis that doesn't take into account a realistic assessment of the right-leaning electorate in the country which consistently disproves polling about issues with their votes is not being realistic.", ">\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016. I don’t think running centrists in red states is the answer. What I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike. Child tax credit, universal pre-k, parental leave, things like that. If BBB had passed I thinks dems would have done a lot better in the midterms and maybe even held onto the house.", ">\n\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016.\n\nYes, because the Republicans were very successful in framing Obamacare and the democrats under Obama as \"socialists\" and radically left. That's what the success of the tea party campaign was. They sure as hell weren't running in 2010 saying that democrats weren't getting anything done, their messaging was all about liberal overreach.\n\nhat I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike.\n\nPossibly. There's very little evidence that passing good legislation ever changes voters minds. It certainly didn't help in 2010, after the most productive congressional session in a generation. Passing terrible legislation like the crime bill and wall street deregulation in Clinton's second term didn't get in the way of them winning the 1998 midterms. People tend to vote based on media narrative.\nWe didn't have a big enough majority in the senate to pass BBB. It's amazing anything at all got passed with a 50-50 split. If people wanted BBB and all the stuff that Republicans blocked the past 2 years, they should have voted to increase the dem's majority instead of giving it to the Republicans who blocked it." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?", ">\n\nIt means the left will continue to lose if dem leadership can’t meet people where they are.", ">\n\nContinuing to lose implies that there have been notable recent losses. The last 3 elections cycles were very good for the democrats.", ">\n\nBut they can’t pass legislation. We’ll see about 2024. But if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach. Even when they did have the majority NP blocked a bill banning stock trading that voters on both sides support.", ">\n\nRight now they can't, which sucks, but politically they are still doing quite well. The reason they lost the house beyond the normal midterm bias against incumbent majorities had quite a bit to do with gerrymandering. Thats why they were able to slightly expand their senate lead (where gerrymandering can't effect things) despite losing the house by a few seats.\n\nBut if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach\n\nWell, if you want to look back on how we achieved a supermajority back in 2008 it was because the party had a platform that was more centrist than it is today and they invested in running conservative \"blue dog\" democrats in red states. So yes, there's certainly an clear evidence that the party can do better electorally by more directly shunning progressive candidates and more openly embracing and financing conservative candidates.\nBut somehow I don't think that's what you mean, is it?\nI'm certainly up for the democrats trying to do things better but any analysis that doesn't take into account a realistic assessment of the right-leaning electorate in the country which consistently disproves polling about issues with their votes is not being realistic.", ">\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016. I don’t think running centrists in red states is the answer. What I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike. Child tax credit, universal pre-k, parental leave, things like that. If BBB had passed I thinks dems would have done a lot better in the midterms and maybe even held onto the house.", ">\n\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016.\n\nYes, because the Republicans were very successful in framing Obamacare and the democrats under Obama as \"socialists\" and radically left. That's what the success of the tea party campaign was. They sure as hell weren't running in 2010 saying that democrats weren't getting anything done, their messaging was all about liberal overreach.\n\nhat I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike.\n\nPossibly. There's very little evidence that passing good legislation ever changes voters minds. It certainly didn't help in 2010, after the most productive congressional session in a generation. Passing terrible legislation like the crime bill and wall street deregulation in Clinton's second term didn't get in the way of them winning the 1998 midterms. People tend to vote based on media narrative.\nWe didn't have a big enough majority in the senate to pass BBB. It's amazing anything at all got passed with a 50-50 split. If people wanted BBB and all the stuff that Republicans blocked the past 2 years, they should have voted to increase the dem's majority instead of giving it to the Republicans who blocked it.", ">\n\nIt sounds like you’re saying the GOP’s rhetoric is more effective than dems. But that’s exactly my point." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?", ">\n\nIt means the left will continue to lose if dem leadership can’t meet people where they are.", ">\n\nContinuing to lose implies that there have been notable recent losses. The last 3 elections cycles were very good for the democrats.", ">\n\nBut they can’t pass legislation. We’ll see about 2024. But if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach. Even when they did have the majority NP blocked a bill banning stock trading that voters on both sides support.", ">\n\nRight now they can't, which sucks, but politically they are still doing quite well. The reason they lost the house beyond the normal midterm bias against incumbent majorities had quite a bit to do with gerrymandering. Thats why they were able to slightly expand their senate lead (where gerrymandering can't effect things) despite losing the house by a few seats.\n\nBut if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach\n\nWell, if you want to look back on how we achieved a supermajority back in 2008 it was because the party had a platform that was more centrist than it is today and they invested in running conservative \"blue dog\" democrats in red states. So yes, there's certainly an clear evidence that the party can do better electorally by more directly shunning progressive candidates and more openly embracing and financing conservative candidates.\nBut somehow I don't think that's what you mean, is it?\nI'm certainly up for the democrats trying to do things better but any analysis that doesn't take into account a realistic assessment of the right-leaning electorate in the country which consistently disproves polling about issues with their votes is not being realistic.", ">\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016. I don’t think running centrists in red states is the answer. What I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike. Child tax credit, universal pre-k, parental leave, things like that. If BBB had passed I thinks dems would have done a lot better in the midterms and maybe even held onto the house.", ">\n\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016.\n\nYes, because the Republicans were very successful in framing Obamacare and the democrats under Obama as \"socialists\" and radically left. That's what the success of the tea party campaign was. They sure as hell weren't running in 2010 saying that democrats weren't getting anything done, their messaging was all about liberal overreach.\n\nhat I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike.\n\nPossibly. There's very little evidence that passing good legislation ever changes voters minds. It certainly didn't help in 2010, after the most productive congressional session in a generation. Passing terrible legislation like the crime bill and wall street deregulation in Clinton's second term didn't get in the way of them winning the 1998 midterms. People tend to vote based on media narrative.\nWe didn't have a big enough majority in the senate to pass BBB. It's amazing anything at all got passed with a 50-50 split. If people wanted BBB and all the stuff that Republicans blocked the past 2 years, they should have voted to increase the dem's majority instead of giving it to the Republicans who blocked it.", ">\n\nIt sounds like you’re saying the GOP’s rhetoric is more effective than dems. But that’s exactly my point.", ">\n\nLegislation and rhetoric are very different things. You were using legislation as examples.\nYes the GOP's rhetoric is more effective than the dems. But the reason for that is not because the rhetoric itself is better crafted. The reason is because Republicans have an entire media apparatus at their disposal that is incredibly well funded and entirely ideologically dedicated to promoting Republican rhetoric. There is essentially no left-wing or center-left media organizations outside of some podcasts that qualify as this for democrats. The news organizations that right-wingers decry as left wing propaganda (NPR, NYTimes MSNBC, CNN) are all simply centrist / attempting-to-look-neutral and do not engage in the kind of demagoguery on behalf of any political party that Fox and - more importantly - right wing AM radio stations do. \nYour rhetoric will be way more effective when you have a multimillion dollar national bullhorn working for you every day." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?", ">\n\nIt means the left will continue to lose if dem leadership can’t meet people where they are.", ">\n\nContinuing to lose implies that there have been notable recent losses. The last 3 elections cycles were very good for the democrats.", ">\n\nBut they can’t pass legislation. We’ll see about 2024. But if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach. Even when they did have the majority NP blocked a bill banning stock trading that voters on both sides support.", ">\n\nRight now they can't, which sucks, but politically they are still doing quite well. The reason they lost the house beyond the normal midterm bias against incumbent majorities had quite a bit to do with gerrymandering. Thats why they were able to slightly expand their senate lead (where gerrymandering can't effect things) despite losing the house by a few seats.\n\nBut if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach\n\nWell, if you want to look back on how we achieved a supermajority back in 2008 it was because the party had a platform that was more centrist than it is today and they invested in running conservative \"blue dog\" democrats in red states. So yes, there's certainly an clear evidence that the party can do better electorally by more directly shunning progressive candidates and more openly embracing and financing conservative candidates.\nBut somehow I don't think that's what you mean, is it?\nI'm certainly up for the democrats trying to do things better but any analysis that doesn't take into account a realistic assessment of the right-leaning electorate in the country which consistently disproves polling about issues with their votes is not being realistic.", ">\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016. I don’t think running centrists in red states is the answer. What I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike. Child tax credit, universal pre-k, parental leave, things like that. If BBB had passed I thinks dems would have done a lot better in the midterms and maybe even held onto the house.", ">\n\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016.\n\nYes, because the Republicans were very successful in framing Obamacare and the democrats under Obama as \"socialists\" and radically left. That's what the success of the tea party campaign was. They sure as hell weren't running in 2010 saying that democrats weren't getting anything done, their messaging was all about liberal overreach.\n\nhat I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike.\n\nPossibly. There's very little evidence that passing good legislation ever changes voters minds. It certainly didn't help in 2010, after the most productive congressional session in a generation. Passing terrible legislation like the crime bill and wall street deregulation in Clinton's second term didn't get in the way of them winning the 1998 midterms. People tend to vote based on media narrative.\nWe didn't have a big enough majority in the senate to pass BBB. It's amazing anything at all got passed with a 50-50 split. If people wanted BBB and all the stuff that Republicans blocked the past 2 years, they should have voted to increase the dem's majority instead of giving it to the Republicans who blocked it.", ">\n\nIt sounds like you’re saying the GOP’s rhetoric is more effective than dems. But that’s exactly my point.", ">\n\nLegislation and rhetoric are very different things. You were using legislation as examples.\nYes the GOP's rhetoric is more effective than the dems. But the reason for that is not because the rhetoric itself is better crafted. The reason is because Republicans have an entire media apparatus at their disposal that is incredibly well funded and entirely ideologically dedicated to promoting Republican rhetoric. There is essentially no left-wing or center-left media organizations outside of some podcasts that qualify as this for democrats. The news organizations that right-wingers decry as left wing propaganda (NPR, NYTimes MSNBC, CNN) are all simply centrist / attempting-to-look-neutral and do not engage in the kind of demagoguery on behalf of any political party that Fox and - more importantly - right wing AM radio stations do. \nYour rhetoric will be way more effective when you have a multimillion dollar national bullhorn working for you every day.", ">\n\nMaybe. you’re rhetoric would also be more effective if you had legislation to back it up." ]

[ "She's trying to level her perception off to remain in power. Boebert almost losing scared her shitless. She knows that the qAnon grift only works for so long and it's about to hit its sell by date. So now she needs to turn more mainstream conservative to remain in office. Why? Well if she leaves office what does she have? She's not attractive enough for a conservative news station to pick her up. No think tank wants a barely educated woman. Lobbyists will consider her unable to hold true influence while not in Congress. She needs to ride the Congressional gravy train until she can retire with her ill gotten millions from back room double dealings.", ">\n\nThere’s an entire right-wing grifter ecosystem that she could plug right into. It’s very lucrative.", ">\n\nI don't think she has enough clout and name value to actually maintain a grift to the same level as Trump. She'd have to run on the Trump brand and you can bet he would want his pound of flesh from that.", ">\n\nI disagree completely. She’s on Bannon’s show all the time. Everyone knows her name.", ">\n\nI'm not saying they don't know her I'm saying outside her current position there isn't enough prominence behind the name to make money off it.", ">\n\n\nIn the Trump era of politics, Greene has quickly become one of the most prolific fundraisers and attention-getters in the Republican Party — and not always for good reasons. \n\nName one time, ONE TIME, when it's been for a good reason.", ">\n\nGiven NPRs pathological need to be seen as \"centrist\", they'll be totally unable to but still insist it must have happened.", ">\n\nIt means that when her time is up, and in those circles it will inevitably be up, she will be seen as the enemy by the same people who support her now. \nThat’s the problem with using cults to prop yourself up. \n“You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.” \nTheir base has turned on virtually everyone.", ">\n\nAli Alexander, Nick Fuentes, and Laura Loomer have already been trashing her all over the place.", ">\n\nAnd she’s fighting with Boebert… \nIt’s like during the crusades when the Christian’s sacked Constantinople, another Christian nation, because they weren’t 100% the same…", ">\n\nIt means NPR is choosing to promote her.", ">\n\nThe media will always rehabilitate fascists", ">\n\nIt means she's a fraud.", ">\n\nThat party is like watching the decline of civilization in real time.", ">\n\nIt's like living in Rome when Augustulus ruled.", ">\n\nShe’s trying to become Trump’s VP choice.", ">\n\nThe bar just got lower?", ">\n\nThe Ultra MAGAs hate her now that she openly backed McCarthy who, in their opinion, is no better than a Democrat. He was seen wearing a Ukraine lapel pin, an unforgivable sin and a betrayal of all things MAGA", ">\n\n\nGeorgia-based Republican strategist John Mason Long said Greene's evolution to work with leadership without alienating the base is smart, given the current dynamics where the House essentially needs the entire conference on the same page.\n\"What she knows she has to do is be an effective legislator,\" he said.\n\n🤨\n\nGreene's political stances do not differ that much from the anti-McCarthy holdouts, but Long, the Georgia-based strategist, said the decision to wield her influence to be constructive within the party instead of obstructive will likely pay off in the long run if she has aspirations for higher office.\n\nExcuse me, I have to go be violently sick.", ">\n\nShe’s got something to lose now", ">\n\nNPR get it together. MTG is a traitor and seditionist. Her little PR stunt shouldn’t change that.", ">\n\nWe’re doomed?", ">\n\nI means our shitty political media has shifted the Overton window rightward once again.\nThey normalized Trump, now they're normalizing Greene.", ">\n\nThe lunatics are running the asylum.", ">\n\nPeaking early, imo", ">\n\nNothing good for America! Anything to do with her is only good for white, rich, “Christian” conservatives!", ">\n\nI figured after eking out a win that Boebert would be the first one to put on a normal people mask and pretend to be serious about her job, but I guess she's content to do the bare minimum to keep her seat. \nMarge wearing a normal people mask and aspiring to higher office is truly frightening, though.", ">\n\nIt’s all thanks to people like NPR.", ">\n\nReally? How is it NPR’s fault? Do you listen to NPR regularly?", ">\n\nYes I do I’m just saying that give her positive PR is stupid.", ">\n\nHow is this positive PR? They are reporting something that happened. Do you think it’s journalistic to see reporting as an us versus them contest?", ">\n\nMTG and McCarthy are doing the ugly?", ">\n\nWouldn't be shocked but her current squeeze appears to be the tool anchor for RSBN", ">\n\nIMO, a grand jury had some questions they wanted answered? It's almost my birthday!", ">\n\nIt means that parasites are very adaptive.", ">\n\nShe's a loony in a country full of loonies?", ">\n\nIt means everyone should ignore these insane people and stop giving them attention.", ">\n\nshe's gonna buy a new straw wig and visit \"antifa\" in jail?", ">\n\nIt means Q is here for good. \nGOP = Q\nQ = GOP", ">\n\nLadies and Gentleman of the jury, I'm just a Caveman. I fell in some ice and later got thawed out by your scientists. Your world frightens and confuses me. Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW and run off into the hills or whatever. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, did little demons get inside and type it? I don't know. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts.", ">\n\nIt means the rot of the GOP is finally reaching the leadership level on ways that will ensure a continued lasting fascistic ideological bent.", ">\n\nSomething about lipstick and a pig", ">\n\nHow is there no top post about Biden's mishandling of secret material--when it's the headline topic of literally every news outlet and political forum? Instead you guys spam posts about MTG and Trump.\nThis subreddit is such a joke.\nEdit: Ooo! One of you already hit the \"kys\" suicide report button. How progressive, mature, and intellectual.", ">\n\nits been near the top of the front page since it broke, are you just looking for something to complain about?", ">\n\nIt means the left will continue to lose if dem leadership can’t meet people where they are.", ">\n\nContinuing to lose implies that there have been notable recent losses. The last 3 elections cycles were very good for the democrats.", ">\n\nBut they can’t pass legislation. We’ll see about 2024. But if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach. Even when they did have the majority NP blocked a bill banning stock trading that voters on both sides support.", ">\n\nRight now they can't, which sucks, but politically they are still doing quite well. The reason they lost the house beyond the normal midterm bias against incumbent majorities had quite a bit to do with gerrymandering. Thats why they were able to slightly expand their senate lead (where gerrymandering can't effect things) despite losing the house by a few seats.\n\nBut if you can’t hold on to both houses given how bad the GOP has become it’s probably time to rethink you’re approach\n\nWell, if you want to look back on how we achieved a supermajority back in 2008 it was because the party had a platform that was more centrist than it is today and they invested in running conservative \"blue dog\" democrats in red states. So yes, there's certainly an clear evidence that the party can do better electorally by more directly shunning progressive candidates and more openly embracing and financing conservative candidates.\nBut somehow I don't think that's what you mean, is it?\nI'm certainly up for the democrats trying to do things better but any analysis that doesn't take into account a realistic assessment of the right-leaning electorate in the country which consistently disproves polling about issues with their votes is not being realistic.", ">\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016. I don’t think running centrists in red states is the answer. What I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike. Child tax credit, universal pre-k, parental leave, things like that. If BBB had passed I thinks dems would have done a lot better in the midterms and maybe even held onto the house.", ">\n\n\nBut after 2008 dems proceeded to lose 1,000 seats in 2016.\n\nYes, because the Republicans were very successful in framing Obamacare and the democrats under Obama as \"socialists\" and radically left. That's what the success of the tea party campaign was. They sure as hell weren't running in 2010 saying that democrats weren't getting anything done, their messaging was all about liberal overreach.\n\nhat I mean by meeting people where they are is addressing issues that affect democrat and republican voters alike.\n\nPossibly. There's very little evidence that passing good legislation ever changes voters minds. It certainly didn't help in 2010, after the most productive congressional session in a generation. Passing terrible legislation like the crime bill and wall street deregulation in Clinton's second term didn't get in the way of them winning the 1998 midterms. People tend to vote based on media narrative.\nWe didn't have a big enough majority in the senate to pass BBB. It's amazing anything at all got passed with a 50-50 split. If people wanted BBB and all the stuff that Republicans blocked the past 2 years, they should have voted to increase the dem's majority instead of giving it to the Republicans who blocked it.", ">\n\nIt sounds like you’re saying the GOP’s rhetoric is more effective than dems. But that’s exactly my point.", ">\n\nLegislation and rhetoric are very different things. You were using legislation as examples.\nYes the GOP's rhetoric is more effective than the dems. But the reason for that is not because the rhetoric itself is better crafted. The reason is because Republicans have an entire media apparatus at their disposal that is incredibly well funded and entirely ideologically dedicated to promoting Republican rhetoric. There is essentially no left-wing or center-left media organizations outside of some podcasts that qualify as this for democrats. The news organizations that right-wingers decry as left wing propaganda (NPR, NYTimes MSNBC, CNN) are all simply centrist / attempting-to-look-neutral and do not engage in the kind of demagoguery on behalf of any political party that Fox and - more importantly - right wing AM radio stations do. \nYour rhetoric will be way more effective when you have a multimillion dollar national bullhorn working for you every day.", ">\n\nMaybe. you’re rhetoric would also be more effective if you had legislation to back it up.", ">\n\nThey do have the legislation for the most part. Republicans are just often able to block it because we haven't had a big majority since 2009, during which time democrats absolutely backed up their rhetoric with legislation and were pummeled in the resulting election because of perceived overreach." ]

[]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did." ]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did.", ">\n\nYes, Putin go all in, he already a old man and whatever happend to russia in future is not his problem soon, maybe some of russian minority regions want to break out?" ]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did.", ">\n\nYes, Putin go all in, he already a old man and whatever happend to russia in future is not his problem soon, maybe some of russian minority regions want to break out?", ">\n\nIt's very hard to think of a war that didn't go on for some time." ]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did.", ">\n\nYes, Putin go all in, he already a old man and whatever happend to russia in future is not his problem soon, maybe some of russian minority regions want to break out?", ">\n\nIt's very hard to think of a war that didn't go on for some time.", ">\n\nthe British-Zanzibar War" ]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did.", ">\n\nYes, Putin go all in, he already a old man and whatever happend to russia in future is not his problem soon, maybe some of russian minority regions want to break out?", ">\n\nIt's very hard to think of a war that didn't go on for some time.", ">\n\nthe British-Zanzibar War", ">\n\nThe USSR's last futile war was Afghanistan. Now it's Ukraine. Mother Russia is poised to repeat their mistake." ]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did.", ">\n\nYes, Putin go all in, he already a old man and whatever happend to russia in future is not his problem soon, maybe some of russian minority regions want to break out?", ">\n\nIt's very hard to think of a war that didn't go on for some time.", ">\n\nthe British-Zanzibar War", ">\n\nThe USSR's last futile war was Afghanistan. Now it's Ukraine. Mother Russia is poised to repeat their mistake.", ">\n\nIt fucking doesn’t have to be that long. It’s not like Ukraine is asking for that much. Just give them enough to take Crimea and the kremlin will fall shortly after." ]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did.", ">\n\nYes, Putin go all in, he already a old man and whatever happend to russia in future is not his problem soon, maybe some of russian minority regions want to break out?", ">\n\nIt's very hard to think of a war that didn't go on for some time.", ">\n\nthe British-Zanzibar War", ">\n\nThe USSR's last futile war was Afghanistan. Now it's Ukraine. Mother Russia is poised to repeat their mistake.", ">\n\nIt fucking doesn’t have to be that long. It’s not like Ukraine is asking for that much. Just give them enough to take Crimea and the kremlin will fall shortly after.", ">\n\nCarthage must be destroyed. Oops. I meant Russian must be destroyed." ]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did.", ">\n\nYes, Putin go all in, he already a old man and whatever happend to russia in future is not his problem soon, maybe some of russian minority regions want to break out?", ">\n\nIt's very hard to think of a war that didn't go on for some time.", ">\n\nthe British-Zanzibar War", ">\n\nThe USSR's last futile war was Afghanistan. Now it's Ukraine. Mother Russia is poised to repeat their mistake.", ">\n\nIt fucking doesn’t have to be that long. It’s not like Ukraine is asking for that much. Just give them enough to take Crimea and the kremlin will fall shortly after.", ">\n\nCarthage must be destroyed. Oops. I meant Russian must be destroyed.", ">\n\nGenius prediction" ]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did.", ">\n\nYes, Putin go all in, he already a old man and whatever happend to russia in future is not his problem soon, maybe some of russian minority regions want to break out?", ">\n\nIt's very hard to think of a war that didn't go on for some time.", ">\n\nthe British-Zanzibar War", ">\n\nThe USSR's last futile war was Afghanistan. Now it's Ukraine. Mother Russia is poised to repeat their mistake.", ">\n\nIt fucking doesn’t have to be that long. It’s not like Ukraine is asking for that much. Just give them enough to take Crimea and the kremlin will fall shortly after.", ">\n\nCarthage must be destroyed. Oops. I meant Russian must be destroyed.", ">\n\nGenius prediction", ">\n\nHonest question, how long must it go on? If the conflict continues as a war of attrition how will Ukraine keep up with replenishing their troops and personnel with 1/3 the population of Russia? How many Ukrainians must die fighting over a stalemate?\nBut I’m sure the revolving door of defense officials and military contractors don’t care for these questions as long as the money and weapons keep flowing" ]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did.", ">\n\nYes, Putin go all in, he already a old man and whatever happend to russia in future is not his problem soon, maybe some of russian minority regions want to break out?", ">\n\nIt's very hard to think of a war that didn't go on for some time.", ">\n\nthe British-Zanzibar War", ">\n\nThe USSR's last futile war was Afghanistan. Now it's Ukraine. Mother Russia is poised to repeat their mistake.", ">\n\nIt fucking doesn’t have to be that long. It’s not like Ukraine is asking for that much. Just give them enough to take Crimea and the kremlin will fall shortly after.", ">\n\nCarthage must be destroyed. Oops. I meant Russian must be destroyed.", ">\n\nGenius prediction", ">\n\nHonest question, how long must it go on? If the conflict continues as a war of attrition how will Ukraine keep up with replenishing their troops and personnel with 1/3 the population of Russia? How many Ukrainians must die fighting over a stalemate?\nBut I’m sure the revolving door of defense officials and military contractors don’t care for these questions as long as the money and weapons keep flowing", ">\n\nWell what's the alternative? If Ukraine stops fighting, their land and people are occupied, and we've seen endless examples of how well Russia treats people they've occupied, hell even how they treat their own people. \nIf Russia stops fighting, life goes back to normal and internationally recognised borders are restored." ]

[ "Toward the end of World War II on March 19, 1945, Adolf Hitler issued his infamous “Nero Decree,” which called for the systematic destruction of Germany. The order was largely thwarted by Hitler's armaments minister, Albert Speer.\nPutin is dragging Russia to a point that eventually the country itself may break up further just like Yugoslavia did.", ">\n\nYes, Putin go all in, he already a old man and whatever happend to russia in future is not his problem soon, maybe some of russian minority regions want to break out?", ">\n\nIt's very hard to think of a war that didn't go on for some time.", ">\n\nthe British-Zanzibar War", ">\n\nThe USSR's last futile war was Afghanistan. Now it's Ukraine. Mother Russia is poised to repeat their mistake.", ">\n\nIt fucking doesn’t have to be that long. It’s not like Ukraine is asking for that much. Just give them enough to take Crimea and the kremlin will fall shortly after.", ">\n\nCarthage must be destroyed. Oops. I meant Russian must be destroyed.", ">\n\nGenius prediction", ">\n\nHonest question, how long must it go on? If the conflict continues as a war of attrition how will Ukraine keep up with replenishing their troops and personnel with 1/3 the population of Russia? How many Ukrainians must die fighting over a stalemate?\nBut I’m sure the revolving door of defense officials and military contractors don’t care for these questions as long as the money and weapons keep flowing", ">\n\nWell what's the alternative? If Ukraine stops fighting, their land and people are occupied, and we've seen endless examples of how well Russia treats people they've occupied, hell even how they treat their own people. \nIf Russia stops fighting, life goes back to normal and internationally recognised borders are restored.", ">\n\nThe alternative is to simply invest in Ukraine. \nEvery war is an infection. And every war is eventually a war of economic attrition. \nTo treat both you simply invest as close to the point of infection as possible. \nEvery dollar invested in Ukraine is like a bullet fired 3 times. Ukraine is making their own barayktars, and overhauling Russian tanks. \nThey are one of the smartest, most creative and industrious fighting forces in world history. \nJust give them the investment to bolster their economy, producer their own machinery and stabilize their currency all at the same time. \nThey can do it and Russia can’t because Russia only knows corruption and corruption breeds economic attrition. \nHell the same entire Russian fuel and maintenance budget turned into an oligarchs yacht. \nJust because we have done war the same way for 5000 years doesn’t mean we can’t change it up. \nInvest in humanity. It really is that simple" ]

[]

[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nUkraine has urged world leaders to intensify efforts to remove Vladimir Putin's troops from its soil as the country's war with Russia dominated the first full day of the gathering of the global elite in Davos.\nUkraine's first lady, Olena Zelenska, used a special address to demand that those attending the World Economic Forum use their influence to end Russia's aggression.\nFatih Birol, the executive director of the International Energy Agency, said Russia's invasion of Ukraine triggered an energy crisis on an unprecedented scale.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Ukraine^#1 Energy^#2 Russia^#3 Davos^#4 war^#5" ]

[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nUkraine has urged world leaders to intensify efforts to remove Vladimir Putin's troops from its soil as the country's war with Russia dominated the first full day of the gathering of the global elite in Davos.\nUkraine's first lady, Olena Zelenska, used a special address to demand that those attending the World Economic Forum use their influence to end Russia's aggression.\nFatih Birol, the executive director of the International Energy Agency, said Russia's invasion of Ukraine triggered an energy crisis on an unprecedented scale.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Ukraine^#1 Energy^#2 Russia^#3 Davos^#4 war^#5", ">\n\nyou will eat ze bug first" ]

[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nUkraine has urged world leaders to intensify efforts to remove Vladimir Putin's troops from its soil as the country's war with Russia dominated the first full day of the gathering of the global elite in Davos.\nUkraine's first lady, Olena Zelenska, used a special address to demand that those attending the World Economic Forum use their influence to end Russia's aggression.\nFatih Birol, the executive director of the International Energy Agency, said Russia's invasion of Ukraine triggered an energy crisis on an unprecedented scale.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Ukraine^#1 Energy^#2 Russia^#3 Davos^#4 war^#5", ">\n\nyou will eat ze bug first", ">\n\nIt would be crazy if we let Ukraine borrow a few F22s, F35s and B2s and then some foreign volunteers that new how to fly them conveniently showed up to volunteer to fight…." ]

[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nUkraine has urged world leaders to intensify efforts to remove Vladimir Putin's troops from its soil as the country's war with Russia dominated the first full day of the gathering of the global elite in Davos.\nUkraine's first lady, Olena Zelenska, used a special address to demand that those attending the World Economic Forum use their influence to end Russia's aggression.\nFatih Birol, the executive director of the International Energy Agency, said Russia's invasion of Ukraine triggered an energy crisis on an unprecedented scale.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Ukraine^#1 Energy^#2 Russia^#3 Davos^#4 war^#5", ">\n\nyou will eat ze bug first", ">\n\nIt would be crazy if we let Ukraine borrow a few F22s, F35s and B2s and then some foreign volunteers that new how to fly them conveniently showed up to volunteer to fight….", ">\n\nHahaha. So crazy it just might encourage others to put a different flag on some icbm and send them." ]

[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nUkraine has urged world leaders to intensify efforts to remove Vladimir Putin's troops from its soil as the country's war with Russia dominated the first full day of the gathering of the global elite in Davos.\nUkraine's first lady, Olena Zelenska, used a special address to demand that those attending the World Economic Forum use their influence to end Russia's aggression.\nFatih Birol, the executive director of the International Energy Agency, said Russia's invasion of Ukraine triggered an energy crisis on an unprecedented scale.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Ukraine^#1 Energy^#2 Russia^#3 Davos^#4 war^#5", ">\n\nyou will eat ze bug first", ">\n\nIt would be crazy if we let Ukraine borrow a few F22s, F35s and B2s and then some foreign volunteers that new how to fly them conveniently showed up to volunteer to fight….", ">\n\nHahaha. So crazy it just might encourage others to put a different flag on some icbm and send them.", ">\n\nThey have zero interest in ending the war yet continue to play victim." ]

[ "This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nUkraine has urged world leaders to intensify efforts to remove Vladimir Putin's troops from its soil as the country's war with Russia dominated the first full day of the gathering of the global elite in Davos.\nUkraine's first lady, Olena Zelenska, used a special address to demand that those attending the World Economic Forum use their influence to end Russia's aggression.\nFatih Birol, the executive director of the International Energy Agency, said Russia's invasion of Ukraine triggered an energy crisis on an unprecedented scale.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Ukraine^#1 Energy^#2 Russia^#3 Davos^#4 war^#5", ">\n\nyou will eat ze bug first", ">\n\nIt would be crazy if we let Ukraine borrow a few F22s, F35s and B2s and then some foreign volunteers that new how to fly them conveniently showed up to volunteer to fight….", ">\n\nHahaha. So crazy it just might encourage others to put a different flag on some icbm and send them.", ">\n\nThey have zero interest in ending the war yet continue to play victim.", ">\n\nYeah I think russia launching unprovoked invasion and murdering tens of thousands of civilians entitles Ukraine to “play the victim”. The Ukrainians living in occupied territories want to be part of Ukraine and absolutely hate russia." ]

[]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards" ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed." ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?" ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though" ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol." ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any." ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol" ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol", ">\n\nConfirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/bluntisimo (1∆).\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards" ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol", ">\n\nConfirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/bluntisimo (1∆).\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\nA Friday off gives you two Saturdays. A Monday off gives you two Sundays. Saturdays are relaxing because you don’t have to work the next day, while Sunday always has that pre-work stress creeping up. Ergo, Friday is the better day off.\nAdditionally, a four day work week that starts on Tuesday feels rushed, because everyone (where I’ve worked, anyway) is trying to catch up/make up the missing work day. A four day week with Friday off feels normal, except maybe a few hours on Thursday. Ergo, a Friday off has a much less stressed work week." ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol", ">\n\nConfirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/bluntisimo (1∆).\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\nA Friday off gives you two Saturdays. A Monday off gives you two Sundays. Saturdays are relaxing because you don’t have to work the next day, while Sunday always has that pre-work stress creeping up. Ergo, Friday is the better day off.\nAdditionally, a four day work week that starts on Tuesday feels rushed, because everyone (where I’ve worked, anyway) is trying to catch up/make up the missing work day. A four day week with Friday off feels normal, except maybe a few hours on Thursday. Ergo, a Friday off has a much less stressed work week.", ">\n\nI don't really get why you would feel pre-work stress if you know you don't work monday (maybe initially but I doubt you feel like that throughout the day). I mean even sunday blues usually only comes in the evening.\nFor the second point, I can see why certains workplaces have that rush, but I don't see why it wouldn't apply to friday aswell. It is interesting to see your perspective, but to me it has the opposite effect." ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol", ">\n\nConfirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/bluntisimo (1∆).\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\nA Friday off gives you two Saturdays. A Monday off gives you two Sundays. Saturdays are relaxing because you don’t have to work the next day, while Sunday always has that pre-work stress creeping up. Ergo, Friday is the better day off.\nAdditionally, a four day work week that starts on Tuesday feels rushed, because everyone (where I’ve worked, anyway) is trying to catch up/make up the missing work day. A four day week with Friday off feels normal, except maybe a few hours on Thursday. Ergo, a Friday off has a much less stressed work week.", ">\n\nI don't really get why you would feel pre-work stress if you know you don't work monday (maybe initially but I doubt you feel like that throughout the day). I mean even sunday blues usually only comes in the evening.\nFor the second point, I can see why certains workplaces have that rush, but I don't see why it wouldn't apply to friday aswell. It is interesting to see your perspective, but to me it has the opposite effect.", ">\n\nFridays give Muslims and Jews their day of rest off, while Monday is not sacred to any religion. For example that allows \"fly out Thursday night, return Sunday\" if you wanna travel on the three day weekend but don't travel Friday night or Saturday. Much more workable than \"fly out early Sunday and return Monday.\"" ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol", ">\n\nConfirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/bluntisimo (1∆).\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\nA Friday off gives you two Saturdays. A Monday off gives you two Sundays. Saturdays are relaxing because you don’t have to work the next day, while Sunday always has that pre-work stress creeping up. Ergo, Friday is the better day off.\nAdditionally, a four day work week that starts on Tuesday feels rushed, because everyone (where I’ve worked, anyway) is trying to catch up/make up the missing work day. A four day week with Friday off feels normal, except maybe a few hours on Thursday. Ergo, a Friday off has a much less stressed work week.", ">\n\nI don't really get why you would feel pre-work stress if you know you don't work monday (maybe initially but I doubt you feel like that throughout the day). I mean even sunday blues usually only comes in the evening.\nFor the second point, I can see why certains workplaces have that rush, but I don't see why it wouldn't apply to friday aswell. It is interesting to see your perspective, but to me it has the opposite effect.", ">\n\nFridays give Muslims and Jews their day of rest off, while Monday is not sacred to any religion. For example that allows \"fly out Thursday night, return Sunday\" if you wanna travel on the three day weekend but don't travel Friday night or Saturday. Much more workable than \"fly out early Sunday and return Monday.\"", ">\n\nJust FYI, Saturday is the Jewish day of rest, not Friday. It’s just that days in Judaism begin at sundown (instead of midnight), so “Satuday” starts on Friday evening." ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol", ">\n\nConfirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/bluntisimo (1∆).\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\nA Friday off gives you two Saturdays. A Monday off gives you two Sundays. Saturdays are relaxing because you don’t have to work the next day, while Sunday always has that pre-work stress creeping up. Ergo, Friday is the better day off.\nAdditionally, a four day work week that starts on Tuesday feels rushed, because everyone (where I’ve worked, anyway) is trying to catch up/make up the missing work day. A four day week with Friday off feels normal, except maybe a few hours on Thursday. Ergo, a Friday off has a much less stressed work week.", ">\n\nI don't really get why you would feel pre-work stress if you know you don't work monday (maybe initially but I doubt you feel like that throughout the day). I mean even sunday blues usually only comes in the evening.\nFor the second point, I can see why certains workplaces have that rush, but I don't see why it wouldn't apply to friday aswell. It is interesting to see your perspective, but to me it has the opposite effect.", ">\n\nFridays give Muslims and Jews their day of rest off, while Monday is not sacred to any religion. For example that allows \"fly out Thursday night, return Sunday\" if you wanna travel on the three day weekend but don't travel Friday night or Saturday. Much more workable than \"fly out early Sunday and return Monday.\"", ">\n\nJust FYI, Saturday is the Jewish day of rest, not Friday. It’s just that days in Judaism begin at sundown (instead of midnight), so “Satuday” starts on Friday evening.", ">\n\nIf it lands on a Friday - you can party, drink, and stay out as late as you want.\nIf it lands on a Monday, you either celebrate on a different day, or suffer hungover on Tuesday at work." ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol", ">\n\nConfirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/bluntisimo (1∆).\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\nA Friday off gives you two Saturdays. A Monday off gives you two Sundays. Saturdays are relaxing because you don’t have to work the next day, while Sunday always has that pre-work stress creeping up. Ergo, Friday is the better day off.\nAdditionally, a four day work week that starts on Tuesday feels rushed, because everyone (where I’ve worked, anyway) is trying to catch up/make up the missing work day. A four day week with Friday off feels normal, except maybe a few hours on Thursday. Ergo, a Friday off has a much less stressed work week.", ">\n\nI don't really get why you would feel pre-work stress if you know you don't work monday (maybe initially but I doubt you feel like that throughout the day). I mean even sunday blues usually only comes in the evening.\nFor the second point, I can see why certains workplaces have that rush, but I don't see why it wouldn't apply to friday aswell. It is interesting to see your perspective, but to me it has the opposite effect.", ">\n\nFridays give Muslims and Jews their day of rest off, while Monday is not sacred to any religion. For example that allows \"fly out Thursday night, return Sunday\" if you wanna travel on the three day weekend but don't travel Friday night or Saturday. Much more workable than \"fly out early Sunday and return Monday.\"", ">\n\nJust FYI, Saturday is the Jewish day of rest, not Friday. It’s just that days in Judaism begin at sundown (instead of midnight), so “Satuday” starts on Friday evening.", ">\n\nIf it lands on a Friday - you can party, drink, and stay out as late as you want.\nIf it lands on a Monday, you either celebrate on a different day, or suffer hungover on Tuesday at work.", ">\n\nI mean you can still do this on friday night of a regular week and if you have monday off, you just have on more day to recover from friday partying.\nI don't see the difference or the advantage it offers." ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol", ">\n\nConfirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/bluntisimo (1∆).\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\nA Friday off gives you two Saturdays. A Monday off gives you two Sundays. Saturdays are relaxing because you don’t have to work the next day, while Sunday always has that pre-work stress creeping up. Ergo, Friday is the better day off.\nAdditionally, a four day work week that starts on Tuesday feels rushed, because everyone (where I’ve worked, anyway) is trying to catch up/make up the missing work day. A four day week with Friday off feels normal, except maybe a few hours on Thursday. Ergo, a Friday off has a much less stressed work week.", ">\n\nI don't really get why you would feel pre-work stress if you know you don't work monday (maybe initially but I doubt you feel like that throughout the day). I mean even sunday blues usually only comes in the evening.\nFor the second point, I can see why certains workplaces have that rush, but I don't see why it wouldn't apply to friday aswell. It is interesting to see your perspective, but to me it has the opposite effect.", ">\n\nFridays give Muslims and Jews their day of rest off, while Monday is not sacred to any religion. For example that allows \"fly out Thursday night, return Sunday\" if you wanna travel on the three day weekend but don't travel Friday night or Saturday. Much more workable than \"fly out early Sunday and return Monday.\"", ">\n\nJust FYI, Saturday is the Jewish day of rest, not Friday. It’s just that days in Judaism begin at sundown (instead of midnight), so “Satuday” starts on Friday evening.", ">\n\nIf it lands on a Friday - you can party, drink, and stay out as late as you want.\nIf it lands on a Monday, you either celebrate on a different day, or suffer hungover on Tuesday at work.", ">\n\nI mean you can still do this on friday night of a regular week and if you have monday off, you just have on more day to recover from friday partying.\nI don't see the difference or the advantage it offers.", ">\n\nIn the tribal regions of my country, a lot of alcohol isn't sold on Sundays. That gives Thursday an obvious edge by comparison." ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol", ">\n\nConfirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/bluntisimo (1∆).\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\nA Friday off gives you two Saturdays. A Monday off gives you two Sundays. Saturdays are relaxing because you don’t have to work the next day, while Sunday always has that pre-work stress creeping up. Ergo, Friday is the better day off.\nAdditionally, a four day work week that starts on Tuesday feels rushed, because everyone (where I’ve worked, anyway) is trying to catch up/make up the missing work day. A four day week with Friday off feels normal, except maybe a few hours on Thursday. Ergo, a Friday off has a much less stressed work week.", ">\n\nI don't really get why you would feel pre-work stress if you know you don't work monday (maybe initially but I doubt you feel like that throughout the day). I mean even sunday blues usually only comes in the evening.\nFor the second point, I can see why certains workplaces have that rush, but I don't see why it wouldn't apply to friday aswell. It is interesting to see your perspective, but to me it has the opposite effect.", ">\n\nFridays give Muslims and Jews their day of rest off, while Monday is not sacred to any religion. For example that allows \"fly out Thursday night, return Sunday\" if you wanna travel on the three day weekend but don't travel Friday night or Saturday. Much more workable than \"fly out early Sunday and return Monday.\"", ">\n\nJust FYI, Saturday is the Jewish day of rest, not Friday. It’s just that days in Judaism begin at sundown (instead of midnight), so “Satuday” starts on Friday evening.", ">\n\nIf it lands on a Friday - you can party, drink, and stay out as late as you want.\nIf it lands on a Monday, you either celebrate on a different day, or suffer hungover on Tuesday at work.", ">\n\nI mean you can still do this on friday night of a regular week and if you have monday off, you just have on more day to recover from friday partying.\nI don't see the difference or the advantage it offers.", ">\n\nIn the tribal regions of my country, a lot of alcohol isn't sold on Sundays. That gives Thursday an obvious edge by comparison.", ">\n\nGood point!\nLocal laws could definetly have an impact on the perception.\nBut I mean, you could always stack up saturday in preparation lol" ]

[ "/u/Internal-Current6555 (OP) has awarded 2 delta(s) in this post.\nAll comments that earned deltas (from OP or other users) are listed here, in /r/DeltaLog.\nPlease note that a change of view doesn't necessarily mean a reversal, or that the conversation has ended.\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\na Thursday night out is a lot better than a Sunday night out. Sundays are perfect for chilling at home and relaxing, why would I want to relax after I relaxed.", ">\n\nSo you're saying we are hardwired to see Sundays and Mondays are their \"usual selfs\" regardless of it is a workday or not? In other words, your argument is that a Monday is always a Monday?", ">\n\nAfraid so my friend, I worked in kitchens all my life and having mon tues and weds off my entire life is ass.\nHere is a song for you though", ">\n\nI understand completely. I had a friend that had sundays and mondays off and it sucked. We could only do stuff sunday night and we couldn't stay too late.\nAnyway, does aren't holydays, but it is true that for some people that don't have a regular monday to friday schedule is pointless. For that reason :\nDelta!\nEdit : Now that I think about it, it was monday and tuesday (my friend's days-off) Otherwise, it doesn't make sense lol.", ">\n\nI think you got to put the ! first, no worries though i kinda like not having any.", ">\n\nOups my bad! \nThere you go :\n!delta\nI hope you not to mad lol", ">\n\nConfirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/bluntisimo (1∆).\n^Delta System Explained ^| ^Deltaboards", ">\n\nA Friday off gives you two Saturdays. A Monday off gives you two Sundays. Saturdays are relaxing because you don’t have to work the next day, while Sunday always has that pre-work stress creeping up. Ergo, Friday is the better day off.\nAdditionally, a four day work week that starts on Tuesday feels rushed, because everyone (where I’ve worked, anyway) is trying to catch up/make up the missing work day. A four day week with Friday off feels normal, except maybe a few hours on Thursday. Ergo, a Friday off has a much less stressed work week.", ">\n\nI don't really get why you would feel pre-work stress if you know you don't work monday (maybe initially but I doubt you feel like that throughout the day). I mean even sunday blues usually only comes in the evening.\nFor the second point, I can see why certains workplaces have that rush, but I don't see why it wouldn't apply to friday aswell. It is interesting to see your perspective, but to me it has the opposite effect.", ">\n\nFridays give Muslims and Jews their day of rest off, while Monday is not sacred to any religion. For example that allows \"fly out Thursday night, return Sunday\" if you wanna travel on the three day weekend but don't travel Friday night or Saturday. Much more workable than \"fly out early Sunday and return Monday.\"", ">\n\nJust FYI, Saturday is the Jewish day of rest, not Friday. It’s just that days in Judaism begin at sundown (instead of midnight), so “Satuday” starts on Friday evening.", ">\n\nIf it lands on a Friday - you can party, drink, and stay out as late as you want.\nIf it lands on a Monday, you either celebrate on a different day, or suffer hungover on Tuesday at work.", ">\n\nI mean you can still do this on friday night of a regular week and if you have monday off, you just have on more day to recover from friday partying.\nI don't see the difference or the advantage it offers.", ">\n\nIn the tribal regions of my country, a lot of alcohol isn't sold on Sundays. That gives Thursday an obvious edge by comparison.", ">\n\nGood point!\nLocal laws could definetly have an impact on the perception.\nBut I mean, you could always stack up saturday in preparation lol", ">\n\nWhereas on Thursday there's extra benefits that Sunday lacks, like being able to stack up on spur of the moment, or perhaps to stack up last minute to accomodate additional guests that are coming" ]

[]

[ "Can we get pictures of the weight? I haven’t actually seen it outside of the renders" ]

[ "Can we get pictures of the weight? I haven’t actually seen it outside of the renders", ">\n\nDo you mean a picture of the back of it? I got the chroma if that's what you were interested in seeing." ]

[ "Can we get pictures of the weight? I haven’t actually seen it outside of the renders", ">\n\nDo you mean a picture of the back of it? I got the chroma if that's what you were interested in seeing.", ">\n\nYeah\nI have an anodized chroma weight. Pretty curious to see the mirror finish" ]

[ "Can we get pictures of the weight? I haven’t actually seen it outside of the renders", ">\n\nDo you mean a picture of the back of it? I got the chroma if that's what you were interested in seeing.", ">\n\nYeah\nI have an anodized chroma weight. Pretty curious to see the mirror finish", ">\n\nDamn that’s hella cool. The mirror finish adds a whole new dimension to the chroma" ]

[]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected.", ">\n\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\n\nWhere are you getting this number? I'm seeing it come up here as median House chamber salary, but that's for staffers and not members. NCSL has base legislative pay for Texas at an even lower $7.2k a term, although the $221/day per-diem does bring that up to a bit under $30k (assuming no special sessions in that 2 year period and that the per-diem isn't paid for weekends).\nBut at least their mileage reimbursement clause has a separate line for aircraft fuel. Lol." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected.", ">\n\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\n\nWhere are you getting this number? I'm seeing it come up here as median House chamber salary, but that's for staffers and not members. NCSL has base legislative pay for Texas at an even lower $7.2k a term, although the $221/day per-diem does bring that up to a bit under $30k (assuming no special sessions in that 2 year period and that the per-diem isn't paid for weekends).\nBut at least their mileage reimbursement clause has a separate line for aircraft fuel. Lol.", ">\n\nAh, I Googled in a hurry and may have misinterpreted. My bad, thanks for the correction. \nThe overall point still stands - hell, even worse, I'm not sure I'd be willing to go to Austin and listen to our political leaders run their mouths off for six months at a mere $7,200." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected.", ">\n\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\n\nWhere are you getting this number? I'm seeing it come up here as median House chamber salary, but that's for staffers and not members. NCSL has base legislative pay for Texas at an even lower $7.2k a term, although the $221/day per-diem does bring that up to a bit under $30k (assuming no special sessions in that 2 year period and that the per-diem isn't paid for weekends).\nBut at least their mileage reimbursement clause has a separate line for aircraft fuel. Lol.", ">\n\nAh, I Googled in a hurry and may have misinterpreted. My bad, thanks for the correction. \nThe overall point still stands - hell, even worse, I'm not sure I'd be willing to go to Austin and listen to our political leaders run their mouths off for six months at a mere $7,200.", ">\n\nFrom column:\nLast November, America elected its first Gen Z member of Congress: 25-year-old Maxwell Frost of Florida. Frost is a natural on social media, and his presence in the halls of power makes Congress feel a bit more relatable for Americans in my age group. \nRecently, the congressman-elect struck a nerve on Twitter when he shared his trouble finding an apartment in D.C. due to his accumulated debt and a poor credit score. That’s relatable, too. \nAbout five years ago, I sat in my college dorm room and heard President Obama tell the nation that if we were disappointed in our elected officials, we should “grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office” ourselves. I did just that and defeated an opponent who had been in office for longer than I had been alive. \nNearly every week, I get a call from a young person who is thinking about taking the same leap of faith I did. I share the story of how I hired my college roommate as my campaign manager, and how we helped break a tie between parties in the state senate. I tell them that I had the chance to enact free community college, and today thousands of students are pursuing a degree that they otherwise would not have been able to afford. I talk about fighting to lower housing costs as the only renter in the senate, and writing a new law to electrify school buses, remembering the diesel exhaust from the school bus I rode not too long ago. \nBut when young candidates ask me how to afford a campaign, I don’t have any good answers.\nI won because of Connecticut’s public financing system that puts 22-year-old candidates on an equal playing field with 22-year incumbents. But most states don’t publicly finance their elections, meaning candidates turn to their personal bank accounts or wealthy networks in order to afford television ads, lawn signs, campaign staff and the myriad of other expenses that come with running a successful campaign. Those expenses lock too many people my age out of office. \nOur country needs young policymakers. Gen Z lawmakers know what it feels like to participate in a school shooter drill, so we fight with urgency for stronger gun regulations. We know how difficult it is to afford a degree in the 21st century, so we push for student debt relief. But most young people can’t afford to run for office, and almost none can afford to win." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected.", ">\n\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\n\nWhere are you getting this number? I'm seeing it come up here as median House chamber salary, but that's for staffers and not members. NCSL has base legislative pay for Texas at an even lower $7.2k a term, although the $221/day per-diem does bring that up to a bit under $30k (assuming no special sessions in that 2 year period and that the per-diem isn't paid for weekends).\nBut at least their mileage reimbursement clause has a separate line for aircraft fuel. Lol.", ">\n\nAh, I Googled in a hurry and may have misinterpreted. My bad, thanks for the correction. \nThe overall point still stands - hell, even worse, I'm not sure I'd be willing to go to Austin and listen to our political leaders run their mouths off for six months at a mere $7,200.", ">\n\nFrom column:\nLast November, America elected its first Gen Z member of Congress: 25-year-old Maxwell Frost of Florida. Frost is a natural on social media, and his presence in the halls of power makes Congress feel a bit more relatable for Americans in my age group. \nRecently, the congressman-elect struck a nerve on Twitter when he shared his trouble finding an apartment in D.C. due to his accumulated debt and a poor credit score. That’s relatable, too. \nAbout five years ago, I sat in my college dorm room and heard President Obama tell the nation that if we were disappointed in our elected officials, we should “grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office” ourselves. I did just that and defeated an opponent who had been in office for longer than I had been alive. \nNearly every week, I get a call from a young person who is thinking about taking the same leap of faith I did. I share the story of how I hired my college roommate as my campaign manager, and how we helped break a tie between parties in the state senate. I tell them that I had the chance to enact free community college, and today thousands of students are pursuing a degree that they otherwise would not have been able to afford. I talk about fighting to lower housing costs as the only renter in the senate, and writing a new law to electrify school buses, remembering the diesel exhaust from the school bus I rode not too long ago. \nBut when young candidates ask me how to afford a campaign, I don’t have any good answers.\nI won because of Connecticut’s public financing system that puts 22-year-old candidates on an equal playing field with 22-year incumbents. But most states don’t publicly finance their elections, meaning candidates turn to their personal bank accounts or wealthy networks in order to afford television ads, lawn signs, campaign staff and the myriad of other expenses that come with running a successful campaign. Those expenses lock too many people my age out of office. \nOur country needs young policymakers. Gen Z lawmakers know what it feels like to participate in a school shooter drill, so we fight with urgency for stronger gun regulations. We know how difficult it is to afford a degree in the 21st century, so we push for student debt relief. But most young people can’t afford to run for office, and almost none can afford to win.", ">\n\nThe problem is that wealth in our society is like a piñata. We cracked it open in the 50s, and everyone rushed it and took all they could. Now, new generations are showing up trying to collect some but a bunch of boomers are standing on the side with their buckets of candy telling the newcomers they should have worked harder like they did. \nWealth is not unlimited and people hoarding it keeps the rest of us from being able to obtain it." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected.", ">\n\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\n\nWhere are you getting this number? I'm seeing it come up here as median House chamber salary, but that's for staffers and not members. NCSL has base legislative pay for Texas at an even lower $7.2k a term, although the $221/day per-diem does bring that up to a bit under $30k (assuming no special sessions in that 2 year period and that the per-diem isn't paid for weekends).\nBut at least their mileage reimbursement clause has a separate line for aircraft fuel. Lol.", ">\n\nAh, I Googled in a hurry and may have misinterpreted. My bad, thanks for the correction. \nThe overall point still stands - hell, even worse, I'm not sure I'd be willing to go to Austin and listen to our political leaders run their mouths off for six months at a mere $7,200.", ">\n\nFrom column:\nLast November, America elected its first Gen Z member of Congress: 25-year-old Maxwell Frost of Florida. Frost is a natural on social media, and his presence in the halls of power makes Congress feel a bit more relatable for Americans in my age group. \nRecently, the congressman-elect struck a nerve on Twitter when he shared his trouble finding an apartment in D.C. due to his accumulated debt and a poor credit score. That’s relatable, too. \nAbout five years ago, I sat in my college dorm room and heard President Obama tell the nation that if we were disappointed in our elected officials, we should “grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office” ourselves. I did just that and defeated an opponent who had been in office for longer than I had been alive. \nNearly every week, I get a call from a young person who is thinking about taking the same leap of faith I did. I share the story of how I hired my college roommate as my campaign manager, and how we helped break a tie between parties in the state senate. I tell them that I had the chance to enact free community college, and today thousands of students are pursuing a degree that they otherwise would not have been able to afford. I talk about fighting to lower housing costs as the only renter in the senate, and writing a new law to electrify school buses, remembering the diesel exhaust from the school bus I rode not too long ago. \nBut when young candidates ask me how to afford a campaign, I don’t have any good answers.\nI won because of Connecticut’s public financing system that puts 22-year-old candidates on an equal playing field with 22-year incumbents. But most states don’t publicly finance their elections, meaning candidates turn to their personal bank accounts or wealthy networks in order to afford television ads, lawn signs, campaign staff and the myriad of other expenses that come with running a successful campaign. Those expenses lock too many people my age out of office. \nOur country needs young policymakers. Gen Z lawmakers know what it feels like to participate in a school shooter drill, so we fight with urgency for stronger gun regulations. We know how difficult it is to afford a degree in the 21st century, so we push for student debt relief. But most young people can’t afford to run for office, and almost none can afford to win.", ">\n\nThe problem is that wealth in our society is like a piñata. We cracked it open in the 50s, and everyone rushed it and took all they could. Now, new generations are showing up trying to collect some but a bunch of boomers are standing on the side with their buckets of candy telling the newcomers they should have worked harder like they did. \nWealth is not unlimited and people hoarding it keeps the rest of us from being able to obtain it.", ">\n\nYes, the amount of boomer stories about “I started this mega company out of a van” etc. are always around. Try that now and if ton don’t get immediately squashed by an existing firm the city will probably fine you for not having the proper premises or something." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected.", ">\n\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\n\nWhere are you getting this number? I'm seeing it come up here as median House chamber salary, but that's for staffers and not members. NCSL has base legislative pay for Texas at an even lower $7.2k a term, although the $221/day per-diem does bring that up to a bit under $30k (assuming no special sessions in that 2 year period and that the per-diem isn't paid for weekends).\nBut at least their mileage reimbursement clause has a separate line for aircraft fuel. Lol.", ">\n\nAh, I Googled in a hurry and may have misinterpreted. My bad, thanks for the correction. \nThe overall point still stands - hell, even worse, I'm not sure I'd be willing to go to Austin and listen to our political leaders run their mouths off for six months at a mere $7,200.", ">\n\nFrom column:\nLast November, America elected its first Gen Z member of Congress: 25-year-old Maxwell Frost of Florida. Frost is a natural on social media, and his presence in the halls of power makes Congress feel a bit more relatable for Americans in my age group. \nRecently, the congressman-elect struck a nerve on Twitter when he shared his trouble finding an apartment in D.C. due to his accumulated debt and a poor credit score. That’s relatable, too. \nAbout five years ago, I sat in my college dorm room and heard President Obama tell the nation that if we were disappointed in our elected officials, we should “grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office” ourselves. I did just that and defeated an opponent who had been in office for longer than I had been alive. \nNearly every week, I get a call from a young person who is thinking about taking the same leap of faith I did. I share the story of how I hired my college roommate as my campaign manager, and how we helped break a tie between parties in the state senate. I tell them that I had the chance to enact free community college, and today thousands of students are pursuing a degree that they otherwise would not have been able to afford. I talk about fighting to lower housing costs as the only renter in the senate, and writing a new law to electrify school buses, remembering the diesel exhaust from the school bus I rode not too long ago. \nBut when young candidates ask me how to afford a campaign, I don’t have any good answers.\nI won because of Connecticut’s public financing system that puts 22-year-old candidates on an equal playing field with 22-year incumbents. But most states don’t publicly finance their elections, meaning candidates turn to their personal bank accounts or wealthy networks in order to afford television ads, lawn signs, campaign staff and the myriad of other expenses that come with running a successful campaign. Those expenses lock too many people my age out of office. \nOur country needs young policymakers. Gen Z lawmakers know what it feels like to participate in a school shooter drill, so we fight with urgency for stronger gun regulations. We know how difficult it is to afford a degree in the 21st century, so we push for student debt relief. But most young people can’t afford to run for office, and almost none can afford to win.", ">\n\nThe problem is that wealth in our society is like a piñata. We cracked it open in the 50s, and everyone rushed it and took all they could. Now, new generations are showing up trying to collect some but a bunch of boomers are standing on the side with their buckets of candy telling the newcomers they should have worked harder like they did. \nWealth is not unlimited and people hoarding it keeps the rest of us from being able to obtain it.", ">\n\nYes, the amount of boomer stories about “I started this mega company out of a van” etc. are always around. Try that now and if ton don’t get immediately squashed by an existing firm the city will probably fine you for not having the proper premises or something.", ">\n\nThat’s sort of like some people picking up guitars and becoming rock stars, just a less extreme outlier." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected.", ">\n\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\n\nWhere are you getting this number? I'm seeing it come up here as median House chamber salary, but that's for staffers and not members. NCSL has base legislative pay for Texas at an even lower $7.2k a term, although the $221/day per-diem does bring that up to a bit under $30k (assuming no special sessions in that 2 year period and that the per-diem isn't paid for weekends).\nBut at least their mileage reimbursement clause has a separate line for aircraft fuel. Lol.", ">\n\nAh, I Googled in a hurry and may have misinterpreted. My bad, thanks for the correction. \nThe overall point still stands - hell, even worse, I'm not sure I'd be willing to go to Austin and listen to our political leaders run their mouths off for six months at a mere $7,200.", ">\n\nFrom column:\nLast November, America elected its first Gen Z member of Congress: 25-year-old Maxwell Frost of Florida. Frost is a natural on social media, and his presence in the halls of power makes Congress feel a bit more relatable for Americans in my age group. \nRecently, the congressman-elect struck a nerve on Twitter when he shared his trouble finding an apartment in D.C. due to his accumulated debt and a poor credit score. That’s relatable, too. \nAbout five years ago, I sat in my college dorm room and heard President Obama tell the nation that if we were disappointed in our elected officials, we should “grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office” ourselves. I did just that and defeated an opponent who had been in office for longer than I had been alive. \nNearly every week, I get a call from a young person who is thinking about taking the same leap of faith I did. I share the story of how I hired my college roommate as my campaign manager, and how we helped break a tie between parties in the state senate. I tell them that I had the chance to enact free community college, and today thousands of students are pursuing a degree that they otherwise would not have been able to afford. I talk about fighting to lower housing costs as the only renter in the senate, and writing a new law to electrify school buses, remembering the diesel exhaust from the school bus I rode not too long ago. \nBut when young candidates ask me how to afford a campaign, I don’t have any good answers.\nI won because of Connecticut’s public financing system that puts 22-year-old candidates on an equal playing field with 22-year incumbents. But most states don’t publicly finance their elections, meaning candidates turn to their personal bank accounts or wealthy networks in order to afford television ads, lawn signs, campaign staff and the myriad of other expenses that come with running a successful campaign. Those expenses lock too many people my age out of office. \nOur country needs young policymakers. Gen Z lawmakers know what it feels like to participate in a school shooter drill, so we fight with urgency for stronger gun regulations. We know how difficult it is to afford a degree in the 21st century, so we push for student debt relief. But most young people can’t afford to run for office, and almost none can afford to win.", ">\n\nThe problem is that wealth in our society is like a piñata. We cracked it open in the 50s, and everyone rushed it and took all they could. Now, new generations are showing up trying to collect some but a bunch of boomers are standing on the side with their buckets of candy telling the newcomers they should have worked harder like they did. \nWealth is not unlimited and people hoarding it keeps the rest of us from being able to obtain it.", ">\n\nYes, the amount of boomer stories about “I started this mega company out of a van” etc. are always around. Try that now and if ton don’t get immediately squashed by an existing firm the city will probably fine you for not having the proper premises or something.", ">\n\nThat’s sort of like some people picking up guitars and becoming rock stars, just a less extreme outlier.", ">\n\nnow you need Disney to run promo and auto tune for you..." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected.", ">\n\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\n\nWhere are you getting this number? I'm seeing it come up here as median House chamber salary, but that's for staffers and not members. NCSL has base legislative pay for Texas at an even lower $7.2k a term, although the $221/day per-diem does bring that up to a bit under $30k (assuming no special sessions in that 2 year period and that the per-diem isn't paid for weekends).\nBut at least their mileage reimbursement clause has a separate line for aircraft fuel. Lol.", ">\n\nAh, I Googled in a hurry and may have misinterpreted. My bad, thanks for the correction. \nThe overall point still stands - hell, even worse, I'm not sure I'd be willing to go to Austin and listen to our political leaders run their mouths off for six months at a mere $7,200.", ">\n\nFrom column:\nLast November, America elected its first Gen Z member of Congress: 25-year-old Maxwell Frost of Florida. Frost is a natural on social media, and his presence in the halls of power makes Congress feel a bit more relatable for Americans in my age group. \nRecently, the congressman-elect struck a nerve on Twitter when he shared his trouble finding an apartment in D.C. due to his accumulated debt and a poor credit score. That’s relatable, too. \nAbout five years ago, I sat in my college dorm room and heard President Obama tell the nation that if we were disappointed in our elected officials, we should “grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office” ourselves. I did just that and defeated an opponent who had been in office for longer than I had been alive. \nNearly every week, I get a call from a young person who is thinking about taking the same leap of faith I did. I share the story of how I hired my college roommate as my campaign manager, and how we helped break a tie between parties in the state senate. I tell them that I had the chance to enact free community college, and today thousands of students are pursuing a degree that they otherwise would not have been able to afford. I talk about fighting to lower housing costs as the only renter in the senate, and writing a new law to electrify school buses, remembering the diesel exhaust from the school bus I rode not too long ago. \nBut when young candidates ask me how to afford a campaign, I don’t have any good answers.\nI won because of Connecticut’s public financing system that puts 22-year-old candidates on an equal playing field with 22-year incumbents. But most states don’t publicly finance their elections, meaning candidates turn to their personal bank accounts or wealthy networks in order to afford television ads, lawn signs, campaign staff and the myriad of other expenses that come with running a successful campaign. Those expenses lock too many people my age out of office. \nOur country needs young policymakers. Gen Z lawmakers know what it feels like to participate in a school shooter drill, so we fight with urgency for stronger gun regulations. We know how difficult it is to afford a degree in the 21st century, so we push for student debt relief. But most young people can’t afford to run for office, and almost none can afford to win.", ">\n\nThe problem is that wealth in our society is like a piñata. We cracked it open in the 50s, and everyone rushed it and took all they could. Now, new generations are showing up trying to collect some but a bunch of boomers are standing on the side with their buckets of candy telling the newcomers they should have worked harder like they did. \nWealth is not unlimited and people hoarding it keeps the rest of us from being able to obtain it.", ">\n\nYes, the amount of boomer stories about “I started this mega company out of a van” etc. are always around. Try that now and if ton don’t get immediately squashed by an existing firm the city will probably fine you for not having the proper premises or something.", ">\n\nThat’s sort of like some people picking up guitars and becoming rock stars, just a less extreme outlier.", ">\n\nnow you need Disney to run promo and auto tune for you...", ">\n\nThis is by design. They don’t want young people to VOTE let alone run for office." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected.", ">\n\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\n\nWhere are you getting this number? I'm seeing it come up here as median House chamber salary, but that's for staffers and not members. NCSL has base legislative pay for Texas at an even lower $7.2k a term, although the $221/day per-diem does bring that up to a bit under $30k (assuming no special sessions in that 2 year period and that the per-diem isn't paid for weekends).\nBut at least their mileage reimbursement clause has a separate line for aircraft fuel. Lol.", ">\n\nAh, I Googled in a hurry and may have misinterpreted. My bad, thanks for the correction. \nThe overall point still stands - hell, even worse, I'm not sure I'd be willing to go to Austin and listen to our political leaders run their mouths off for six months at a mere $7,200.", ">\n\nFrom column:\nLast November, America elected its first Gen Z member of Congress: 25-year-old Maxwell Frost of Florida. Frost is a natural on social media, and his presence in the halls of power makes Congress feel a bit more relatable for Americans in my age group. \nRecently, the congressman-elect struck a nerve on Twitter when he shared his trouble finding an apartment in D.C. due to his accumulated debt and a poor credit score. That’s relatable, too. \nAbout five years ago, I sat in my college dorm room and heard President Obama tell the nation that if we were disappointed in our elected officials, we should “grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office” ourselves. I did just that and defeated an opponent who had been in office for longer than I had been alive. \nNearly every week, I get a call from a young person who is thinking about taking the same leap of faith I did. I share the story of how I hired my college roommate as my campaign manager, and how we helped break a tie between parties in the state senate. I tell them that I had the chance to enact free community college, and today thousands of students are pursuing a degree that they otherwise would not have been able to afford. I talk about fighting to lower housing costs as the only renter in the senate, and writing a new law to electrify school buses, remembering the diesel exhaust from the school bus I rode not too long ago. \nBut when young candidates ask me how to afford a campaign, I don’t have any good answers.\nI won because of Connecticut’s public financing system that puts 22-year-old candidates on an equal playing field with 22-year incumbents. But most states don’t publicly finance their elections, meaning candidates turn to their personal bank accounts or wealthy networks in order to afford television ads, lawn signs, campaign staff and the myriad of other expenses that come with running a successful campaign. Those expenses lock too many people my age out of office. \nOur country needs young policymakers. Gen Z lawmakers know what it feels like to participate in a school shooter drill, so we fight with urgency for stronger gun regulations. We know how difficult it is to afford a degree in the 21st century, so we push for student debt relief. But most young people can’t afford to run for office, and almost none can afford to win.", ">\n\nThe problem is that wealth in our society is like a piñata. We cracked it open in the 50s, and everyone rushed it and took all they could. Now, new generations are showing up trying to collect some but a bunch of boomers are standing on the side with their buckets of candy telling the newcomers they should have worked harder like they did. \nWealth is not unlimited and people hoarding it keeps the rest of us from being able to obtain it.", ">\n\nYes, the amount of boomer stories about “I started this mega company out of a van” etc. are always around. Try that now and if ton don’t get immediately squashed by an existing firm the city will probably fine you for not having the proper premises or something.", ">\n\nThat’s sort of like some people picking up guitars and becoming rock stars, just a less extreme outlier.", ">\n\nnow you need Disney to run promo and auto tune for you...", ">\n\nThis is by design. They don’t want young people to VOTE let alone run for office.", ">\n\nIt's not even just young people. They don't want average people running. That's why the system is designed such that corporate America has to purchase candidates via donations.\nWhat we need is a complete nationwide public campaign financing system that's fair, equal, and has no strings attached to policy stances or any other criteria. It should be completely abstracted away from the candidates.\nDon't ask me who would pay for it... or how. I don't know (maybe ask Connecticut?). But that's what we'd have if we want fair equal elections rather than a choice of candidates backed by corporate America rather than ordinary people." ]

[ "It's because they can't afford to run or live off the income. Most local and town government elected positions, which would be stepping stones to state legislatures and beyond, are part time and pay little to nothing which requires you to hold a full time job on the side. I would love the opportunity to help run my community, but I can't afford it. This opens the door to the already rich, or... concessions to donors who are paying for their vote. It doesn't help that we as a society have been brainwashed to believe politicians are overpaid, so we vote against any politician who supports pay raises, which leaves us with those who don't need the money in charge.", ">\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\nThat's not a living wage, especially with the need to live in your district while also spending six months every two years in Austin. At the same time, good luck leaving your day job for six months every other year to go serve in the legislature. \nIt's basically a system designed to make it impossible for a normal person to serve in the legislature, even if they could somehow get elected.", ">\n\n\nTexas' state legislature meets every other year from early January to late May. Pay for a full two year term in the legislature is $45,000 ($22,500/yr).\n\nWhere are you getting this number? I'm seeing it come up here as median House chamber salary, but that's for staffers and not members. NCSL has base legislative pay for Texas at an even lower $7.2k a term, although the $221/day per-diem does bring that up to a bit under $30k (assuming no special sessions in that 2 year period and that the per-diem isn't paid for weekends).\nBut at least their mileage reimbursement clause has a separate line for aircraft fuel. Lol.", ">\n\nAh, I Googled in a hurry and may have misinterpreted. My bad, thanks for the correction. \nThe overall point still stands - hell, even worse, I'm not sure I'd be willing to go to Austin and listen to our political leaders run their mouths off for six months at a mere $7,200.", ">\n\nFrom column:\nLast November, America elected its first Gen Z member of Congress: 25-year-old Maxwell Frost of Florida. Frost is a natural on social media, and his presence in the halls of power makes Congress feel a bit more relatable for Americans in my age group. \nRecently, the congressman-elect struck a nerve on Twitter when he shared his trouble finding an apartment in D.C. due to his accumulated debt and a poor credit score. That’s relatable, too. \nAbout five years ago, I sat in my college dorm room and heard President Obama tell the nation that if we were disappointed in our elected officials, we should “grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office” ourselves. I did just that and defeated an opponent who had been in office for longer than I had been alive. \nNearly every week, I get a call from a young person who is thinking about taking the same leap of faith I did. I share the story of how I hired my college roommate as my campaign manager, and how we helped break a tie between parties in the state senate. I tell them that I had the chance to enact free community college, and today thousands of students are pursuing a degree that they otherwise would not have been able to afford. I talk about fighting to lower housing costs as the only renter in the senate, and writing a new law to electrify school buses, remembering the diesel exhaust from the school bus I rode not too long ago. \nBut when young candidates ask me how to afford a campaign, I don’t have any good answers.\nI won because of Connecticut’s public financing system that puts 22-year-old candidates on an equal playing field with 22-year incumbents. But most states don’t publicly finance their elections, meaning candidates turn to their personal bank accounts or wealthy networks in order to afford television ads, lawn signs, campaign staff and the myriad of other expenses that come with running a successful campaign. Those expenses lock too many people my age out of office. \nOur country needs young policymakers. Gen Z lawmakers know what it feels like to participate in a school shooter drill, so we fight with urgency for stronger gun regulations. We know how difficult it is to afford a degree in the 21st century, so we push for student debt relief. But most young people can’t afford to run for office, and almost none can afford to win.", ">\n\nThe problem is that wealth in our society is like a piñata. We cracked it open in the 50s, and everyone rushed it and took all they could. Now, new generations are showing up trying to collect some but a bunch of boomers are standing on the side with their buckets of candy telling the newcomers they should have worked harder like they did. \nWealth is not unlimited and people hoarding it keeps the rest of us from being able to obtain it.", ">\n\nYes, the amount of boomer stories about “I started this mega company out of a van” etc. are always around. Try that now and if ton don’t get immediately squashed by an existing firm the city will probably fine you for not having the proper premises or something.", ">\n\nThat’s sort of like some people picking up guitars and becoming rock stars, just a less extreme outlier.", ">\n\nnow you need Disney to run promo and auto tune for you...", ">\n\nThis is by design. They don’t want young people to VOTE let alone run for office.", ">\n\nIt's not even just young people. They don't want average people running. That's why the system is designed such that corporate America has to purchase candidates via donations.\nWhat we need is a complete nationwide public campaign financing system that's fair, equal, and has no strings attached to policy stances or any other criteria. It should be completely abstracted away from the candidates.\nDon't ask me who would pay for it... or how. I don't know (maybe ask Connecticut?). But that's what we'd have if we want fair equal elections rather than a choice of candidates backed by corporate America rather than ordinary people.", ">\n\nIf we implemented national campaign finance and election advertising rules, we wouldn’t have to pay for it. Elections cost a fucking fortune in this country, and most of it goes to ad buys. If we get campaign commercials off the airwaves (please dear god), people will have to elect politicians based on the issues and their platforms. We just need to make platform info readily available, and it can be largely summed up in a handout at the voting place. We could save ten billion dollars every election cycle (more on Presidential race years) by doing this." ]