Datasets:

---

Francesco-A

/

github-issues_huggingface-datasets

like 0

[]

[ "Could you run `make style` to fix the code_quality fail ?\r\nYou'll need `black` and `isort` that you can install by doing `pip install -e .[quality]`", "Thanks @lhoestq\r\nI fixed the styling", "Thank you :)" ]

[]

[]

[ { "color": "a2eeef", "default": true, "description": "New feature or request", "id": 1935892871, "name": "enhancement", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODcx", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/enhancement" } ]

[ "This is cool! I think some aspects to think about and decide in terms of API are:\r\n- do we allow several methods (chained i guess)\r\n- how do we inspect the currently set method(s)\r\n- how do we control/reset them" ]

[]

[]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._" ]

[]

[ "This is awesome ! The dataset card and the dataset script look amazing :)\r\n\r\nI wanted to ask you if you'd be interested to have this dataset under the namespace of you research group at https://huggingface.co/coastalcph ? If yes, then you can actually create a dataset repository under your research group name and upload the files from this PR there", "Hi @lhoestq,\r\n\r\nYeah, I could do that. I see that people do that a lot of models, but not for datasets. \r\n\r\nIs there any good reason to have it under the organization domain instead of the general domain?\r\n\r\n Thanks!", "It's nice to have it under your namespace:\r\n- it will appear on your research group page, along with your models\r\n- you can edit or create datasets at any time - you don't need to open PRs on GitHub\r\n\r\nAll the datasets that are not under a namespace are this way because we started adding datasets from GitHub. Now we encourage users to upload them directly to make things simpler, and aligned with the workflow for models\r\n\r\n(the documentation will be updated in the following days)\r\n\r\nNote that we will keep accepting PRs here though when there is no clear namespace under which a dataset should be, or for users that want a review from us", "Ok, I'll do that. So, I'll just have to upload all the files under the `/fairlex` directory in my PR, right?", "Yes exactly !", "Ok, I uploaded most of them from the UI environment (https://huggingface.co/datasets/coastalcph/fairlex). Can I possibly upload the dummy data as well from the UI environment. I really want to avoid the CLI right now 😄 ", "Yea sure, feel free to use the UI of the website, even for the dummy data ^^", "Did you upload them yourself? Because I see the data preview, and I'm pretty sure, I didn't do that 😄 ", "The preview is computed from the real data ;)\r\n\r\nThe dummy data are used for testing only", "Haha, ok I was shocked! Cool, I close this PR, then. Thanks, again! ", "Thank you 🤗" ]

[ { "color": "d73a4a", "default": true, "description": "Something isn't working", "id": 1935892857, "name": "bug", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODU3", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/bug" } ]

[ "Hi! I think this error may be related to using an older version of the library. I was able to load the dataset without any issues using the latest version of `datasets`. Can you upgrade to the latest version of `datasets` and try again? :)", "Hi! As @stevhliu suggested, to fix the issue, update the lib to the newest version with:\r\n```\r\npip install -U datasets\r\n```\r\nand download the dataset as follows:\r\n```python\r\nfrom datasets import load_dataset\r\ndset = load_dataset('scientific_papers', 'arxiv', download_mode=\"force_redownload\")\r\n```", "Thanks for the quick response! It works now. The problem is that I used nlp. load_dataset instead of datasets. load_dataset." ]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._", "<details>\n<summary>Show benchmarks</summary>\n\nPyArrow==6.0.0\n\n<details>\n<summary>Show updated benchmarks!</summary>\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json\n\n| metric | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_array2d | read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_array2d | read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_unformated after write_array2d | read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_unformated after write_nested_sequence | write_array2d | write_flattened_sequence | write_nested_sequence |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.008638 / 0.011353 (-0.002715) | 0.004565 / 0.011008 (-0.006444) | 0.098984 / 0.038508 (0.060476) | 0.030118 / 0.023109 (0.007009) | 0.321779 / 0.275898 (0.045881) | 0.366905 / 0.323480 (0.043426) | 0.006931 / 0.007986 (-0.001055) | 0.004728 / 0.004328 (0.000399) | 0.078358 / 0.004250 (0.074108) | 0.037755 / 0.037052 (0.000702) | 0.312694 / 0.258489 (0.054205) | 0.351781 / 0.293841 (0.057940) | 0.033266 / 0.128546 (-0.095280) | 0.011397 / 0.075646 (-0.064250) | 0.323501 / 0.419271 (-0.095771) | 0.040779 / 0.043533 (-0.002754) | 0.303533 / 0.255139 (0.048394) | 0.340940 / 0.283200 (0.057740) | 0.088701 / 0.141683 (-0.052982) | 1.472058 / 1.452155 (0.019904) | 1.529535 / 1.492716 (0.036818) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_getitem\\_100B.json\n\n| metric | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_random_rows | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_rows | get_first_row | get_last_row |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.191803 / 0.018006 (0.173797) | 0.409773 / 0.000490 (0.409283) | 0.002704 / 0.000200 (0.002504) | 0.000217 / 0.000054 (0.000163) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json\n\n| metric | select | shard | shuffle | sort | train_test_split |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.023520 / 0.037411 (-0.013891) | 0.096967 / 0.014526 (0.082441) | 0.107911 / 0.176557 (-0.068646) | 0.146425 / 0.737135 (-0.590710) | 0.109025 / 0.296338 (-0.187314) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json\n\n| metric | read 5000 | read 50000 | read_batch 50000 10 | read_batch 50000 100 | read_batch 50000 1000 | read_formatted numpy 5000 | read_formatted pandas 5000 | read_formatted tensorflow 5000 | read_formatted torch 5000 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 | shuffled read 5000 | shuffled read 50000 | shuffled read_batch 50000 10 | shuffled read_batch 50000 100 | shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 | shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.418565 / 0.215209 (0.203356) | 4.183429 / 2.077655 (2.105774) | 1.886534 / 1.504120 (0.382414) | 1.689015 / 1.541195 (0.147820) | 1.710757 / 1.468490 (0.242267) | 0.693211 / 4.584777 (-3.891566) | 3.380062 / 3.745712 (-0.365650) | 2.619910 / 5.269862 (-2.649952) | 1.457512 / 4.565676 (-3.108164) | 0.082421 / 0.424275 (-0.341854) | 0.012126 / 0.007607 (0.004519) | 0.525249 / 0.226044 (0.299205) | 5.244541 / 2.268929 (2.975613) | 2.305908 / 55.444624 (-53.138717) | 1.945298 / 6.876477 (-4.931178) | 2.015618 / 2.142072 (-0.126455) | 0.816746 / 4.805227 (-3.988481) | 0.148325 / 6.500664 (-6.352339) | 0.063939 / 0.075469 (-0.011530) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json\n\n| metric | filter | map fast-tokenizer batched | map identity | map identity batched | map no-op batched | map no-op batched numpy | map no-op batched pandas | map no-op batched pytorch | map no-op batched tensorflow |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 1.255790 / 1.841788 (-0.585998) | 13.433219 / 8.074308 (5.358911) | 13.916957 / 10.191392 (3.725565) | 0.153468 / 0.680424 (-0.526956) | 0.028722 / 0.534201 (-0.505479) | 0.398245 / 0.579283 (-0.181038) | 0.399067 / 0.434364 (-0.035296) | 0.457525 / 0.540337 (-0.082812) | 0.542391 / 1.386936 (-0.844545) |\n\n</details>\nPyArrow==latest\n\n<details>\n<summary>Show updated benchmarks!</summary>\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json\n\n| metric | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_array2d | read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_array2d | read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_unformated after write_array2d | read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_unformated after write_nested_sequence | write_array2d | write_flattened_sequence | write_nested_sequence |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.006411 / 0.011353 (-0.004942) | 0.004552 / 0.011008 (-0.006456) | 0.098036 / 0.038508 (0.059527) | 0.026532 / 0.023109 (0.003422) | 0.412270 / 0.275898 (0.136372) | 0.442771 / 0.323480 (0.119291) | 0.004891 / 0.007986 (-0.003094) | 0.003488 / 0.004328 (-0.000841) | 0.075437 / 0.004250 (0.071186) | 0.036228 / 0.037052 (-0.000824) | 0.413246 / 0.258489 (0.154757) | 0.453546 / 0.293841 (0.159705) | 0.031054 / 0.128546 (-0.097492) | 0.011589 / 0.075646 (-0.064058) | 0.318477 / 0.419271 (-0.100794) | 0.041075 / 0.043533 (-0.002457) | 0.411182 / 0.255139 (0.156043) | 0.436991 / 0.283200 (0.153792) | 0.086563 / 0.141683 (-0.055120) | 1.511948 / 1.452155 (0.059793) | 1.570925 / 1.492716 (0.078208) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_getitem\\_100B.json\n\n| metric | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_random_rows | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_rows | get_first_row | get_last_row |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.200510 / 0.018006 (0.182504) | 0.403450 / 0.000490 (0.402960) | 0.000397 / 0.000200 (0.000197) | 0.000058 / 0.000054 (0.000003) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json\n\n| metric | select | shard | shuffle | sort | train_test_split |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.023950 / 0.037411 (-0.013461) | 0.097334 / 0.014526 (0.082808) | 0.105228 / 0.176557 (-0.071328) | 0.137699 / 0.737135 (-0.599436) | 0.107063 / 0.296338 (-0.189275) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json\n\n| metric | read 5000 | read 50000 | read_batch 50000 10 | read_batch 50000 100 | read_batch 50000 1000 | read_formatted numpy 5000 | read_formatted pandas 5000 | read_formatted tensorflow 5000 | read_formatted torch 5000 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 | shuffled read 5000 | shuffled read 50000 | shuffled read_batch 50000 10 | shuffled read_batch 50000 100 | shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 | shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.474420 / 0.215209 (0.259211) | 4.748212 / 2.077655 (2.670557) | 2.407318 / 1.504120 (0.903198) | 2.198949 / 1.541195 (0.657755) | 2.220377 / 1.468490 (0.751887) | 0.704022 / 4.584777 (-3.880755) | 3.366128 / 3.745712 (-0.379584) | 1.839454 / 5.269862 (-3.430408) | 1.151183 / 4.565676 (-3.414493) | 0.082818 / 0.424275 (-0.341457) | 0.012765 / 0.007607 (0.005158) | 0.571913 / 0.226044 (0.345868) | 5.722544 / 2.268929 (3.453615) | 2.858279 / 55.444624 (-52.586346) | 2.513479 / 6.876477 (-4.362998) | 2.574227 / 2.142072 (0.432154) | 0.803282 / 4.805227 (-4.001945) | 0.150603 / 6.500664 (-6.350061) | 0.066594 / 0.075469 (-0.008875) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json\n\n| metric | filter | map fast-tokenizer batched | map identity | map identity batched | map no-op batched | map no-op batched numpy | map no-op batched pandas | map no-op batched pytorch | map no-op batched tensorflow |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 1.301161 / 1.841788 (-0.540627) | 13.580745 / 8.074308 (5.506436) | 13.301551 / 10.191392 (3.110159) | 0.141424 / 0.680424 (-0.539000) | 0.016579 / 0.534201 (-0.517622) | 0.380726 / 0.579283 (-0.198557) | 0.383011 / 0.434364 (-0.051353) | 0.438717 / 0.540337 (-0.101620) | 0.527085 / 1.386936 (-0.859851) |\n\n</details>\n</details>\n\n![](https://cml.dev/watermark.png \"CML watermark\")\n" ]

[ { "color": "a2eeef", "default": true, "description": "New feature or request", "id": 1935892871, "name": "enhancement", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODcx", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/enhancement" }, { "color": "c5def5", "default": false, "description": "Generic discussion on the library", "id": 2067400324, "name": "generic discussion", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwyMDY3NDAwMzI0", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/generic%20discussion" } ]

[ "Hi ! I guess you are talking about the dataset cards that are in this repository on github ?\r\n\r\nI think github allows to submit a PR even for 1 line though the `Edit file` button on the page of the dataset card.\r\n\r\nMaybe let's mention this in `CONTRIBUTING.md` ?", "We now host all the datasets on the HF Hub, where you can easily edit them through UI (for single file changes) or Git workflow (for single/multiple file changes)" ]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[ "Indeed there's currently a mismatch between the description and what it rouge actually returns.\r\nThanks for proposing this fix :) \r\n\r\nI think it's better to return rouge 1-2-L.\r\nWas there a reason to only include rouge 1 and rouge L @thomwolf ? ", "rougeLsum is also missing, could you add it ?", "Adding `RougeLSum` would fix https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/617", "I am opening a PR with both of them right now actually :)", "Also the format of the output isn't exactly ideal, It's usually only the F-1 score that is cared about. \r\n\r\nFormatting the output to reflect how `ROUGE-1-5-5` (the perl version thats usually used and pyrouge is a wrapper over it), would be better.\r\n\r\n", "I'll close this since you seem to have already added it in another PR. Sorry for the delay in responding to you @lhoestq.", "What do you mean by \"Formatting the output to reflect how ROUGE-1-5-5\" @Shashi456 ?", "I like the idea of returning all the scores for two reason:\r\n- Rouge's aggregator does sampling and therefore it returns \"low\" \"mid\" and \"high\" scores\r\n- It is interesting to have the precision and recall to see how the F1 score was computed\r\nBut I understand your point that returning only the F1 score makes sense since it's the one that's always used ", "@thomwolf the scores now returned look like this:\r\n```\r\n{'rouge1': AggregateScore(low=Score(precision=0.16620308156871524, recall=0.18219819615984395, fmeasure=0.16226017699359463), mid=Score(precision=0.17274338501705871, recall=0.1890957812369246, fmeasure=0.16823877588620403), high=Score(precision=0.17934569582981455, recall=0.1965626706042028, fmeasure=0.17491509794856058)), \r\n'rouge2': AggregateScore(low=Score(precision=0.12478835737689957, recall=0.1362113231755514, fmeasure=0.12055941950062395), mid=Score(precision=0.1303967602691664, recall=0.1423747229852964, fmeasure=0.1258363976151122), high=Score(precision=0.13654527560789362, recall=0.1488071465116122, fmeasure=0.13184989406704056)), \r\n'rougeL': AggregateScore(low=Score(precision=0.16568068818352072, recall=0.1811919016674486, fmeasure=0.1614784523482225), mid=Score(precision=0.17156684723552357, recall=0.1879777628247058, fmeasure=0.16720699286250762), high=Score(precision=0.17788847350584547, recall=0.1948899838530898, fmeasure=0.17316501523379826))}\r\n```\r\n\r\nWhile when computed through the perl rouge script, it looks like:\r\n```\r\nROUGE-1 Average_R: 0.34775 (95%-conf.int. 0.34546 - 0.35025)\r\nROUGE-1 Average_P: 0.19381 (95%-conf.int. 0.19246 - 0.19538)\r\nROUGE-1 Average_F: 0.24070 (95%-conf.int. 0.23925 - 0.24230)\r\n---------------------------------------------\r\nROUGE-2 Average_R: 0.07160 (95%-conf.int. 0.07010 - 0.07298)\r\nROUGE-2 Average_F: 0.04845 (95%-conf.int. 0.04741 - 0.04942)\r\n---------------------------------------------\r\nROUGE-L Average_R: 0.26404 (95%-conf.int. 0.26215 - 0.26598)\r\nROUGE-L Average_P: 0.14696 (95%-conf.int. 0.14576 - 0.14815)\r\nROUGE-L Average_F: 0.18245 (95%-conf.int. 0.18120 - 0.18367)\r\n```\r\nwhile the wrapper returns the much more readable:\r\n```\r\n[2020-07-30 18:13:38,556 INFO] Rouges at step 13000 \r\n>> ROUGE-F(1/2/3/l): 43.43/20.42/39.78 \r\nROUGE-R(1/2/3/l): 53.91/25.34/49.32\r\n```\r\n\r\nThe formatting allows for easy reading, and although \"low\", \"mid\", \"high\" make sense, this is more concise and effective. \r\n\r\nOne way of changing this might be to return a dictionary that returns values like `rouge_1_precision`, `rouge_1_F1`, `rouge_1_recall`, and maybe also having the ability to get the values you are interested in and keeping `recall` and `F1` as default.", "cc: @lhoestq ", "Ok I see.\r\nI think it's also important to follow one of the existing output format (there are already too many different formats, let's try not to add another different one)\r\nI'd still stick with the current format and not transform the output of the python implementation of rouge since it's already widely used.\r\nWhat do you think ?", "Maybe we could convert the dataclasses in dictionnaries, would that help @Shashi456 ?", "@thomwolf yeah I think that would help. I initially didn't understand the high low mid categories. Dictionaries could help in this case I guess, and if we allow the user to choose what they want i.e F1 and precision or recall." ]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._" ]

[]

[ "Hi,\r\n\r\nThis is a bug so thanks for reporting it. `Dataset.__setstate__` is the problem, which is called when `Dataset.rename_column` tries to copy the dataset with `copy.deepcopy(self)`. This only happens if the `split` arg in `load_dataset` was defined as `ReadInstruction`.\r\n\r\nTo overcome this issue, use the named splits API (for now):\r\n```python\r\ntrain_ds, test_ds = load_dataset(\r\n path='csv', \r\n delimiter='\\t', \r\n data_files=text_files, \r\n split=['train[:90%]', 'train[-10%:]'],\r\n)\r\n\r\ntrain_ds = train_ds.rename_column('sentence', 'text')\r\n```", "This has been fixed in #2043 , thanks @mariosasko \r\nThe fix is available on master and we'll do a new release soon :)\r\n\r\nfeel free to re-open if you still have issues" ]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._" ]

[ { "color": "0e8a16", "default": false, "description": "Contribution to a dataset script", "id": 4564477500, "name": "dataset contribution", "node_id": "LA_kwDODunzps8AAAABEBBmPA", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/dataset%20contribution" } ]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._", "Alright this is ready for review :)\r\nI mostly would like your opinion on the YAML structure and what we can do in the docs (IMO we can add the docs about those fields in the Hub docs). Other than that let me know if the changes in info.py and features.py look good to you", "LGTM and looking forward to having this merged!! ❤️ ", "We plan to do a release today, we'll merge this after the release :)\r\n\r\nEDIT: actually tomorrow", "Created https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/5018 where I added the YAML `dataset_info` of every single dataset in this repo\r\n\r\nsee other dataset cards: [imagenet-1k](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/040102f100964a33fd334e2695f1c493fa6b92db/datasets/imagenet-1k/README.md), [glue](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/040102f100964a33fd334e2695f1c493fa6b92db/datasets/glue/README.md), [flores](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/040102f100964a33fd334e2695f1c493fa6b92db/datasets/flores/README.md), [gem](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/040102f100964a33fd334e2695f1c493fa6b92db/datasets/gem/README.md)", "Took your comments into account and updated `push_to_hub` to push the dataset_info to the README.md instead of json :) Let me know if it sounds good to you now !" ]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._", "<details>\n<summary>Show benchmarks</summary>\n\nPyArrow==6.0.0\n\n<details>\n<summary>Show updated benchmarks!</summary>\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json\n\n| metric | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_array2d | read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_array2d | read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_unformated after write_array2d | read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_unformated after write_nested_sequence | write_array2d | write_flattened_sequence | write_nested_sequence |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.008477 / 0.011353 (-0.002875) | 0.004565 / 0.011008 (-0.006443) | 0.101640 / 0.038508 (0.063132) | 0.029581 / 0.023109 (0.006472) | 0.296524 / 0.275898 (0.020625) | 0.363175 / 0.323480 (0.039695) | 0.006961 / 0.007986 (-0.001024) | 0.003365 / 0.004328 (-0.000963) | 0.079689 / 0.004250 (0.075439) | 0.034881 / 0.037052 (-0.002171) | 0.310979 / 0.258489 (0.052489) | 0.348663 / 0.293841 (0.054822) | 0.034549 / 0.128546 (-0.093997) | 0.011463 / 0.075646 (-0.064184) | 0.326218 / 0.419271 (-0.093053) | 0.041393 / 0.043533 (-0.002140) | 0.297604 / 0.255139 (0.042465) | 0.335751 / 0.283200 (0.052551) | 0.086521 / 0.141683 (-0.055162) | 1.478906 / 1.452155 (0.026752) | 1.512777 / 1.492716 (0.020060) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_getitem\\_100B.json\n\n| metric | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_random_rows | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_rows | get_first_row | get_last_row |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.008767 / 0.018006 (-0.009239) | 0.397386 / 0.000490 (0.396897) | 0.003136 / 0.000200 (0.002936) | 0.000096 / 0.000054 (0.000042) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json\n\n| metric | select | shard | shuffle | sort | train_test_split |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.022804 / 0.037411 (-0.014608) | 0.097591 / 0.014526 (0.083066) | 0.103189 / 0.176557 (-0.073368) | 0.138165 / 0.737135 (-0.598970) | 0.107464 / 0.296338 (-0.188874) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json\n\n| metric | read 5000 | read 50000 | read_batch 50000 10 | read_batch 50000 100 | read_batch 50000 1000 | read_formatted numpy 5000 | read_formatted pandas 5000 | read_formatted tensorflow 5000 | read_formatted torch 5000 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 | shuffled read 5000 | shuffled read 50000 | shuffled read_batch 50000 10 | shuffled read_batch 50000 100 | shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 | shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.428956 / 0.215209 (0.213747) | 4.269656 / 2.077655 (2.192001) | 2.154418 / 1.504120 (0.650298) | 1.914176 / 1.541195 (0.372982) | 1.818452 / 1.468490 (0.349962) | 0.701381 / 4.584777 (-3.883396) | 3.425190 / 3.745712 (-0.320522) | 1.862545 / 5.269862 (-3.407316) | 1.166271 / 4.565676 (-3.399405) | 0.083678 / 0.424275 (-0.340597) | 0.012254 / 0.007607 (0.004647) | 0.535710 / 0.226044 (0.309665) | 5.342528 / 2.268929 (3.073600) | 2.627135 / 55.444624 (-52.817489) | 2.308313 / 6.876477 (-4.568164) | 2.325568 / 2.142072 (0.183496) | 0.818318 / 4.805227 (-3.986909) | 0.149812 / 6.500664 (-6.350853) | 0.064559 / 0.075469 (-0.010910) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json\n\n| metric | filter | map fast-tokenizer batched | map identity | map identity batched | map no-op batched | map no-op batched numpy | map no-op batched pandas | map no-op batched pytorch | map no-op batched tensorflow |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 1.253611 / 1.841788 (-0.588176) | 13.646763 / 8.074308 (5.572455) | 14.387630 / 10.191392 (4.196238) | 0.159937 / 0.680424 (-0.520487) | 0.029123 / 0.534201 (-0.505078) | 0.400909 / 0.579283 (-0.178374) | 0.422830 / 0.434364 (-0.011534) | 0.488205 / 0.540337 (-0.052133) | 0.577982 / 1.386936 (-0.808954) |\n\n</details>\nPyArrow==latest\n\n<details>\n<summary>Show updated benchmarks!</summary>\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json\n\n| metric | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_array2d | read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_array2d | read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_unformated after write_array2d | read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_unformated after write_nested_sequence | write_array2d | write_flattened_sequence | write_nested_sequence |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.006430 / 0.011353 (-0.004923) | 0.004433 / 0.011008 (-0.006576) | 0.077459 / 0.038508 (0.038951) | 0.026949 / 0.023109 (0.003840) | 0.350276 / 0.275898 (0.074378) | 0.376189 / 0.323480 (0.052709) | 0.004945 / 0.007986 (-0.003041) | 0.003280 / 0.004328 (-0.001048) | 0.076465 / 0.004250 (0.072215) | 0.037510 / 0.037052 (0.000457) | 0.350410 / 0.258489 (0.091921) | 0.386778 / 0.293841 (0.092937) | 0.031933 / 0.128546 (-0.096613) | 0.011691 / 0.075646 (-0.063956) | 0.086519 / 0.419271 (-0.332753) | 0.042490 / 0.043533 (-0.001043) | 0.355930 / 0.255139 (0.100791) | 0.366500 / 0.283200 (0.083301) | 0.089542 / 0.141683 (-0.052141) | 1.492859 / 1.452155 (0.040704) | 1.548626 / 1.492716 (0.055910) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_getitem\\_100B.json\n\n| metric | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_random_rows | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_rows | get_first_row | get_last_row |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.220123 / 0.018006 (0.202117) | 0.396970 / 0.000490 (0.396480) | 0.000398 / 0.000200 (0.000198) | 0.000059 / 0.000054 (0.000004) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json\n\n| metric | select | shard | shuffle | sort | train_test_split |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.024831 / 0.037411 (-0.012580) | 0.099681 / 0.014526 (0.085156) | 0.108922 / 0.176557 (-0.067635) | 0.143004 / 0.737135 (-0.594131) | 0.109671 / 0.296338 (-0.186667) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json\n\n| metric | read 5000 | read 50000 | read_batch 50000 10 | read_batch 50000 100 | read_batch 50000 1000 | read_formatted numpy 5000 | read_formatted pandas 5000 | read_formatted tensorflow 5000 | read_formatted torch 5000 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 | shuffled read 5000 | shuffled read 50000 | shuffled read_batch 50000 10 | shuffled read_batch 50000 100 | shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 | shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.444237 / 0.215209 (0.229028) | 4.430330 / 2.077655 (2.352675) | 2.235003 / 1.504120 (0.730883) | 2.010499 / 1.541195 (0.469305) | 2.030585 / 1.468490 (0.562095) | 0.701938 / 4.584777 (-3.882839) | 3.334569 / 3.745712 (-0.411144) | 1.861680 / 5.269862 (-3.408181) | 1.166072 / 4.565676 (-3.399604) | 0.083870 / 0.424275 (-0.340405) | 0.012615 / 0.007607 (0.005008) | 0.548789 / 0.226044 (0.322744) | 5.488064 / 2.268929 (3.219136) | 2.614926 / 55.444624 (-52.829698) | 2.246455 / 6.876477 (-4.630022) | 2.277439 / 2.142072 (0.135367) | 0.808449 / 4.805227 (-3.996778) | 0.152434 / 6.500664 (-6.348230) | 0.066709 / 0.075469 (-0.008760) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json\n\n| metric | filter | map fast-tokenizer batched | map identity | map identity batched | map no-op batched | map no-op batched numpy | map no-op batched pandas | map no-op batched pytorch | map no-op batched tensorflow |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 1.316880 / 1.841788 (-0.524908) | 13.965269 / 8.074308 (5.890961) | 13.660187 / 10.191392 (3.468795) | 0.157801 / 0.680424 (-0.522623) | 0.016580 / 0.534201 (-0.517621) | 0.382834 / 0.579283 (-0.196449) | 0.394717 / 0.434364 (-0.039647) | 0.465138 / 0.540337 (-0.075200) | 0.552399 / 1.386936 (-0.834537) |\n\n</details>\n</details>\n\n![](https://cml.dev/watermark.png#fa06927a62e2983e2f0e8b7ba8262070c1543d78 \"CML watermark\")\n", "<details>\n<summary>Show benchmarks</summary>\n\nPyArrow==6.0.0\n\n<details>\n<summary>Show updated benchmarks!</summary>\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json\n\n| metric | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_array2d | read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_array2d | read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_unformated after write_array2d | read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_unformated after write_nested_sequence | write_array2d | write_flattened_sequence | write_nested_sequence |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.009341 / 0.011353 (-0.002012) | 0.005303 / 0.011008 (-0.005705) | 0.099287 / 0.038508 (0.060779) | 0.035587 / 0.023109 (0.012478) | 0.295146 / 0.275898 (0.019248) | 0.370470 / 0.323480 (0.046990) | 0.008910 / 0.007986 (0.000925) | 0.004358 / 0.004328 (0.000029) | 0.076298 / 0.004250 (0.072047) | 0.047187 / 0.037052 (0.010135) | 0.309025 / 0.258489 (0.050536) | 0.346659 / 0.293841 (0.052818) | 0.038378 / 0.128546 (-0.090168) | 0.012475 / 0.075646 (-0.063172) | 0.334370 / 0.419271 (-0.084901) | 0.048391 / 0.043533 (0.004858) | 0.298613 / 0.255139 (0.043474) | 0.317329 / 0.283200 (0.034130) | 0.108748 / 0.141683 (-0.032934) | 1.450454 / 1.452155 (-0.001701) | 1.519883 / 1.492716 (0.027167) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_getitem\\_100B.json\n\n| metric | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_random_rows | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_rows | get_first_row | get_last_row |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.011513 / 0.018006 (-0.006494) | 0.498941 / 0.000490 (0.498451) | 0.005098 / 0.000200 (0.004898) | 0.000096 / 0.000054 (0.000042) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json\n\n| metric | select | shard | shuffle | sort | train_test_split |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.030523 / 0.037411 (-0.006888) | 0.105478 / 0.014526 (0.090952) | 0.121101 / 0.176557 (-0.055456) | 0.159951 / 0.737135 (-0.577184) | 0.126766 / 0.296338 (-0.169572) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json\n\n| metric | read 5000 | read 50000 | read_batch 50000 10 | read_batch 50000 100 | read_batch 50000 1000 | read_formatted numpy 5000 | read_formatted pandas 5000 | read_formatted tensorflow 5000 | read_formatted torch 5000 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 | shuffled read 5000 | shuffled read 50000 | shuffled read_batch 50000 10 | shuffled read_batch 50000 100 | shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 | shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.399101 / 0.215209 (0.183892) | 3.997069 / 2.077655 (1.919414) | 1.851592 / 1.504120 (0.347472) | 1.695708 / 1.541195 (0.154513) | 1.759504 / 1.468490 (0.291014) | 0.708241 / 4.584777 (-3.876536) | 3.786724 / 3.745712 (0.041012) | 3.523731 / 5.269862 (-1.746131) | 1.899474 / 4.565676 (-2.666203) | 0.086680 / 0.424275 (-0.337595) | 0.012232 / 0.007607 (0.004625) | 0.508507 / 0.226044 (0.282462) | 5.086320 / 2.268929 (2.817391) | 2.234906 / 55.444624 (-53.209718) | 1.911090 / 6.876477 (-4.965386) | 1.989232 / 2.142072 (-0.152841) | 0.863660 / 4.805227 (-3.941567) | 0.169334 / 6.500664 (-6.331330) | 0.063273 / 0.075469 (-0.012196) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json\n\n| metric | filter | map fast-tokenizer batched | map identity | map identity batched | map no-op batched | map no-op batched numpy | map no-op batched pandas | map no-op batched pytorch | map no-op batched tensorflow |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 1.237590 / 1.841788 (-0.604198) | 15.417631 / 8.074308 (7.343323) | 15.235308 / 10.191392 (5.043916) | 0.209431 / 0.680424 (-0.470993) | 0.029214 / 0.534201 (-0.504987) | 0.444767 / 0.579283 (-0.134516) | 0.447776 / 0.434364 (0.013413) | 0.538440 / 0.540337 (-0.001897) | 0.635760 / 1.386936 (-0.751176) |\n\n</details>\nPyArrow==latest\n\n<details>\n<summary>Show updated benchmarks!</summary>\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json\n\n| metric | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_array2d | read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_array2d | read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_unformated after write_array2d | read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_unformated after write_nested_sequence | write_array2d | write_flattened_sequence | write_nested_sequence |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.007758 / 0.011353 (-0.003594) | 0.005539 / 0.011008 (-0.005469) | 0.077011 / 0.038508 (0.038503) | 0.034305 / 0.023109 (0.011196) | 0.363352 / 0.275898 (0.087454) | 0.411882 / 0.323480 (0.088403) | 0.006286 / 0.007986 (-0.001700) | 0.004378 / 0.004328 (0.000050) | 0.075504 / 0.004250 (0.071253) | 0.052728 / 0.037052 (0.015675) | 0.370122 / 0.258489 (0.111633) | 0.421910 / 0.293841 (0.128069) | 0.038444 / 0.128546 (-0.090102) | 0.012602 / 0.075646 (-0.063045) | 0.088540 / 0.419271 (-0.330731) | 0.060321 / 0.043533 (0.016788) | 0.350502 / 0.255139 (0.095363) | 0.393211 / 0.283200 (0.110011) | 0.113057 / 0.141683 (-0.028626) | 1.453275 / 1.452155 (0.001120) | 1.541033 / 1.492716 (0.048317) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_getitem\\_100B.json\n\n| metric | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_random_rows | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_rows | get_first_row | get_last_row |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.333603 / 0.018006 (0.315597) | 0.510548 / 0.000490 (0.510058) | 0.003573 / 0.000200 (0.003373) | 0.000116 / 0.000054 (0.000061) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json\n\n| metric | select | shard | shuffle | sort | train_test_split |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.032783 / 0.037411 (-0.004628) | 0.111943 / 0.014526 (0.097418) | 0.127154 / 0.176557 (-0.049403) | 0.171716 / 0.737135 (-0.565420) | 0.132441 / 0.296338 (-0.163898) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json\n\n| metric | read 5000 | read 50000 | read_batch 50000 10 | read_batch 50000 100 | read_batch 50000 1000 | read_formatted numpy 5000 | read_formatted pandas 5000 | read_formatted tensorflow 5000 | read_formatted torch 5000 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 | shuffled read 5000 | shuffled read 50000 | shuffled read_batch 50000 10 | shuffled read_batch 50000 100 | shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 | shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.439110 / 0.215209 (0.223901) | 4.440874 / 2.077655 (2.363220) | 2.145850 / 1.504120 (0.641730) | 1.909566 / 1.541195 (0.368371) | 2.032199 / 1.468490 (0.563709) | 0.711295 / 4.584777 (-3.873482) | 3.845729 / 3.745712 (0.100017) | 3.583555 / 5.269862 (-1.686307) | 1.836856 / 4.565676 (-2.728820) | 0.085966 / 0.424275 (-0.338309) | 0.012479 / 0.007607 (0.004872) | 0.545379 / 0.226044 (0.319334) | 5.425724 / 2.268929 (3.156796) | 2.648304 / 55.444624 (-52.796321) | 2.286369 / 6.876477 (-4.590108) | 2.367714 / 2.142072 (0.225642) | 0.831035 / 4.805227 (-3.974192) | 0.167603 / 6.500664 (-6.333061) | 0.064721 / 0.075469 (-0.010748) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json\n\n| metric | filter | map fast-tokenizer batched | map identity | map identity batched | map no-op batched | map no-op batched numpy | map no-op batched pandas | map no-op batched pytorch | map no-op batched tensorflow |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 1.244495 / 1.841788 (-0.597292) | 15.304267 / 8.074308 (7.229958) | 13.912185 / 10.191392 (3.720793) | 0.156459 / 0.680424 (-0.523965) | 0.019181 / 0.534201 (-0.515019) | 0.425940 / 0.579283 (-0.153343) | 0.427956 / 0.434364 (-0.006408) | 0.529126 / 0.540337 (-0.011212) | 0.628360 / 1.386936 (-0.758576) |\n\n</details>\n</details>\n\n![](https://cml.dev/watermark.png#da31f6ee02af29d92ee5541e4a3fc388c3d9abfc \"CML watermark\")\n" ]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._" ]

[ { "color": "d73a4a", "default": true, "description": "Something isn't working", "id": 1935892857, "name": "bug", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODU3", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/bug" } ]

[ "cc @lhoestq ", "Thanks for reporting, @cakiki.\r\n\r\nI would say the deletion of the dir is an expected behavior though...", "`dask.to_parquet` has an \"overwrite\" parameter and default is `False`, we could also have something similar", "Thank you both for your feedback!\r\n\r\n@albertvillanova I think I might have have the wrong mental model of what the function was meant to do. I thought it would be an API similar to the pandas `to_XX` write methods (Like the one @lhoestq mentions) so I just assumed it would download the dataframe to whichever folder I specififed (`\"./\"` in my case) so I could load it into a dask dataframe. I absolutely did not expect it to delete everything in my local directory, including the script where I called it from :smile: \r\n\r\nI think Quentin's proposed solution sounds like a reasonable feature!", "actually there's already a `download_mode` parameter that defaults to `REUSE_DATASET_IF_EXISTS` - so I guess it's just a matter of not deleting files unrelated to the dataset, and to overwrite existing dataset files if the download mode is `REUSE_CACHE_IF_EXISTS` or `FORCE_REDOWNLOAD`" ]

[ { "color": "d73a4a", "default": true, "description": "Something isn't working", "id": 1935892857, "name": "bug", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODU3", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/bug" } ]

[ "@mariosasko could you help me with this issue? we've started the discussion from [here](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/4895#issuecomment-1248227130)", "Hi again! Can you please pass the directory name containing the dataset script instead of the script name to `datasets-cli test`?", "Yes, it worked! thanks a lot" ]

[ { "color": "d73a4a", "default": true, "description": "Something isn't working", "id": 1935892857, "name": "bug", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODU3", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/bug" } ]

[ "Hi ! It's slower indeed because a datasets on which `select`/`shard`/`train_test_split`/`shuffle` has been called has to do additional steps to retrieve the data of the dataset table in the right order.\r\n\r\nIndeed, if you call `dataset.select([0, 5, 10])`, the underlying table of the dataset is not altered to keep the examples at index 0, 5, and 10. Instead, an indices mapping is added on top of the table, that says that the first example is at index 0, the second at index 5 and the last one at index 10.\r\n\r\nTherefore accessing the examples of the dataset is slower because of the additional step that uses the indices mapping.\r\n\r\nThe step that takes the most time is to query the dataset table from a list of indices here:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/047dc756ed20fbf06e6bcaf910464aba0e20610a/src/datasets/formatting/formatting.py#L61-L63\r\n\r\nIn your case it can be made significantly faster by checking if the indices are contiguous. If they're contiguous, we could pass a python `slice` or `range` instead of a list of integers to `_query_table`. This way `_query_table` will do only one lookup to get the queried batch instead of `batch_size` lookups.\r\n\r\nGiven that calling `select` with contiguous indices is a common use case I'm in favor of implementing such an optimization :)\r\nLet me know what you think", "Hi, thanks for the response!\r\nI still don't understand why it is so much slower than iterating and saving:\r\n```python\r\nfrom datasets import load_dataset\r\n\r\noriginal = load_dataset(\"squad\", split=\"train\")\r\noriginal.to_json(\"from_original.json\") # Takes 0 seconds\r\n\r\nselected_subset1 = original.select([i for i in range(len(original))])\r\nselected_subset1.to_json(\"from_select1.json\") # Takes 99 seconds\r\n\r\nselected_subset2 = original.select([i for i in range(int(len(original) / 2))])\r\nselected_subset2.to_json(\"from_select2.json\") # Takes 47 seconds\r\n\r\nselected_subset3 = original.select([i for i in range(len(original)) if i % 2 == 0])\r\nselected_subset3.to_json(\"from_select3.json\") # Takes 49 seconds\r\n\r\nimport json\r\nimport time\r\ndef fast_to_json(dataset, path):\r\n start = time.time()\r\n with open(path, mode=\"w\") as f:\r\n for example in dataset:\r\n f.write(json.dumps(example, separators=(',', ':')) + \"\\n\")\r\n end = time.time()\r\n print(f\"Saved {len(dataset)} examples to {path} in {end - start} seconds.\")\r\n\r\nfast_to_json(original, \"from_original_fast.json\")\r\nfast_to_json(selected_subset1, \"from_select1_fast.json\")\r\nfast_to_json(selected_subset2, \"from_select2_fast.json\")\r\nfast_to_json(selected_subset3, \"from_select3_fast.json\")\r\n```\r\n```\r\nSaved 87599 examples to from_original_fast.json in 8 seconds.\r\nSaved 87599 examples to from_select1_fast.json in 10 seconds.\r\nSaved 43799 examples to from_select2_fast.json in 6 seconds.\r\nSaved 43800 examples to from_select3_fast.json in 5 seconds.\r\n```", "There are slight differences between what you're doing and what `to_json` is actually doing.\r\nIn particular `to_json` currently converts batches of rows (as an arrow table) to a pandas dataframe, and then to JSON Lines. From your benchmark it looks like it's faster if we don't use pandas.\r\n\r\nThanks for investigating, I think we can optimize `to_json` significantly thanks to your test.", "Thanks for your observations, @eladsegal! I spent some time with this and tried different approaches. Turns out that https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/bb13373637b1acc55f8a468a8927a56cf4732230/src/datasets/io/json.py#L100 is giving the problem when we use `to_json` after `select`. This is when `indices` parameter in `query_table` is not `None` (if it is `None` then `to_json` should work as expected)\r\n\r\nIn order to circumvent this problem, I found out instead of doing Arrow Table -> Pandas-> JSON we can directly go to JSON by using `to_pydict()` which is a little slower than the current approach but at least `select` works properly now. Lmk what you guys think of it @lhoestq, @eladsegal?", "Sounds good to me ! Feel free to also share your benchmarks for reference @bhavitvyamalik ", "Posting it in @eladsegal's format:\r\n\r\nFor `squad`:\r\nSaving examples using current `to_json` in 3.63 secs\r\nSaving examples to `from_select1_fast.json` in 5.00 secs\r\nSaving examples to `from_select2_fast.json` in 2.45 secs\r\nSaving examples to `from_select3_fast.json` in 2.50 secs\r\n\r\nFor `squad_v2`:\r\nSaving examples using current `to_json` in 5.26 secs\r\nSaving examples to `from_select1_fast.json` in 7.54 secs\r\nSaving examples to `from_select2_fast.json` in 3.80 secs\r\nSaving examples to `from_select3_fast.json` in 3.67 secs" ]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._" ]

[]

[]

[]

[ "Just noticed while \r\n```load_dataset('local_path/datastes/xor_tydi_qa')``` works,\r\n```load_dataset('xor_tydi_qa')``` \r\noutputs an error: \r\n`\r\nFileNotFoundError: Couldn't find file at https://nlp.cs.washington.edu/xorqa/XORQA_site/data/xor_dev_retrieve_eng_span.jsonl\r\n`\r\n(the old url)\r\n\r\nI tired clearing the cache `.cache/huggingface/modules` and `.cache/huggingface/datasets`, didn't work.\r\n\r\nAnyone know how to fix this? Thanks.", "It seems like the error is not on your end. By default, the lib tries to download the version of the dataset script that matches the version of the lib, and that version of the script is, in your case, broken because the old URL no longer works. Once this PR gets merged, you can wait for the new release or set `script_version` to `\"master\"` in `load_dataset` to get the fixed version of the script.", "@mariosasko Thanks! It works now.\r\n\r\nPasting the docstring here for reference.\r\n```\r\n script_version (:class:`~utils.Version` or :obj:`str`, optional): Version of the dataset script to load:\r\n\r\n - For canonical datasets in the `huggingface/datasets` library like \"squad\", the default version of the module is the local version fo the lib.\r\n You can specify a different version from your local version of the lib (e.g. \"master\" or \"1.2.0\") but it might cause compatibility issues.\r\n - For community provided datasets like \"lhoestq/squad\" that have their own git repository on the Datasets Hub, the default version \"main\" corresponds to the \"main\" branch.\r\n You can specify a different version that the default \"main\" by using a commit sha or a git tag of the dataset repository.\r\n```\r\nBranch name didn't work, but commit sha works.", "Regarding the issue you mentioned about the `--ignore_verifications` flag, I think we should actually change the current behavior of the `--save_infos` flag to make it ignore the verifications as well, so that you don't need to specific `--ignore_verifications` in this case.", "@lhoestq I realized I forgot to change this:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/fdbf5a97d3393f4a91e4cddcabe364029508f7ce/datasets/xor_tydi_qa/xor_tydi_qa.py#L72-L73\r\n\r\nWhat should I do?", "Oh indeed. Please open a PR to change this. This should be 1.1.0" ]

[]

[]

[]

[ "@mariosasko please let me know whether we need to include some sort of tests to make sure that the decorator is working as expected. Thanks! 🤗 ", "The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/datasets/pr_4493). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint.", "Hi, thanks for working on this! Yes, please add (simple) tests so we can avoid any unexpected behavior in the future.\r\n\r\n`@transmit_format` doesn't handle column renaming, so I removed it from `rename_column` and `rename_columns` and added a comment to explain this.", "Oops, I thought this PR was already merged and deleted from the source repository, I'll be creating a new branch out of `main` so as to re-create this PR... My bad :weary:" ]

[]

[ "The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/datasets/pr_5339). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint.", "@lhoestq I think I need some serious help with the tests 😅...I started this locally but it got too time consuming.\n\nOne issue I remember running into is with lossless audio encoding/decoding. I started thinking of using the underlying Audio feature instead of PyAV so I didn't have to rewrite similar logic here...but assumed that would turn into a mess w/ underlying logic" ]

[]

[ "heck, test failings. moving to draft. will come back to this later today hopefully", "Thanks for fixing this :)\r\nI just updated the dataset_infos.json and added the missing `pretty_name` tag to the dataset card", "thank you @lhoestq! running around as always it felt through as a lower priority..." ]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[ "@lhoestq I saw some common changes you made on the other PR's (Similar Opus Datasets). I fixed those changes here. Can you please review it once ? \r\nThanks.", "Hi @rkc007 , thanks for the contribution.\r\nUnfortunately, the CAPES dataset has already been added here: #1307\r\nI'm closing the PR ", "@lhoestq FYI" ]

[]

[ "Hi ! `datasets` doesn't do batching - the PyTorch DataLoader does and is created by the `Trainer`. Do you pass other arguments to training_args with respect to data loading ?\r\n\r\nAlso we recently released `.to_iterable_dataset` that does pretty much what you implemented, but using contiguous shards to get a better speed:\r\n```python\r\nif use_iterable_dataset:\r\n num_shards = 100\r\n dataset = dataset.to_iterable_dataset(num_shards=num_shards)\r\n```", "This is the full set of training args passed. No training args were changed when switching dataset types.\r\n\r\n```python\r\ntraining_args = TrainingArguments(\r\n output_dir=\"./checkpoints\",\r\n overwrite_output_dir=True,\r\n num_train_epochs=1,\r\n per_device_train_batch_size=256,\r\n save_steps=2000,\r\n save_total_limit=4,\r\n prediction_loss_only=True,\r\n report_to='none',\r\n gradient_accumulation_steps=6,\r\n fp16=True,\r\n max_steps=60000,\r\n lr_scheduler_type='linear',\r\n warmup_ratio=0.1,\r\n logging_steps=100,\r\n weight_decay=0.01,\r\n adam_beta1=0.9,\r\n adam_beta2=0.98,\r\n adam_epsilon=1e-6,\r\n learning_rate=1e-4\r\n)\r\n```", "I think the issue comes from `transformers`: https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/issues/21444", "Makes sense. Given that it's a `transformers` issue and already being tracked, I'll close this out." ]

[]

[ "Could you add this function to the documentation please ?\r\n\r\nYou can add it in `main_classes.rst`, and maybe add a `Tip` section in the `map` section in the `process.rst`" ]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._" ]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._", "@lhoestq Good catch! This currently leads to an AttributeError (due to `writer` being None) on this line:\r\nhttps://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/fed1628d49a91f9ae259ddf6edbb252c7972d9a3/src/datasets/builder.py#L1552\r\n" ]

[ { "color": "d73a4a", "default": true, "description": "Something isn't working", "id": 1935892857, "name": "bug", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODU3", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/bug" } ]

[ "Scratch that, probably the old and incompatible usage of dataset builder from promptsource.", "Actually, re-opening this issue cause the error persists\r\n\r\n```python\r\n>>> load_dataset(\"qed\")\r\nDownloading and preparing dataset qed/qed (download: 13.43 MiB, generated: 9.70 MiB, post-processed: Unknown size, total: 23.14 MiB) to /home/victor_huggingface_co/.cache/huggingface/datasets/qed/qed/1.0.0/47d8b6f033393aa520a8402d4baf2d6bdc1b2fbde3dc156e595d2ef34caf7d75...\r\n100%|███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 2/2 [00:00<00:00, 2228.64it/s]\r\nTraceback (most recent call last): \r\n File \"<stdin>\", line 1, in <module>\r\n File \"/home/victor_huggingface_co/miniconda3/envs/promptsource/lib/python3.7/site-packages/datasets/load.py\", line 1669, in load_dataset\r\n use_auth_token=use_auth_token,\r\n File \"/home/victor_huggingface_co/miniconda3/envs/promptsource/lib/python3.7/site-packages/datasets/builder.py\", line 594, in download_and_prepare\r\n dl_manager=dl_manager, verify_infos=verify_infos, **download_and_prepare_kwargs\r\n File \"/home/victor_huggingface_co/miniconda3/envs/promptsource/lib/python3.7/site-packages/datasets/builder.py\", line 681, in _download_and_prepare\r\n self._prepare_split(split_generator, **prepare_split_kwargs)\r\n File \"/home/victor_huggingface_co/miniconda3/envs/promptsource/lib/python3.7/site-packages/datasets/builder.py\", line 1083, in _prepare_split\r\n num_examples, num_bytes = writer.finalize()\r\n File \"/home/victor_huggingface_co/miniconda3/envs/promptsource/lib/python3.7/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py\", line 468, in finalize\r\n self.write_examples_on_file()\r\n File \"/home/victor_huggingface_co/miniconda3/envs/promptsource/lib/python3.7/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py\", line 339, in write_examples_on_file\r\n pa_array = pa.array(typed_sequence)\r\n File \"pyarrow/array.pxi\", line 229, in pyarrow.lib.array\r\n File \"pyarrow/array.pxi\", line 110, in pyarrow.lib._handle_arrow_array_protocol\r\n File \"/home/victor_huggingface_co/miniconda3/envs/promptsource/lib/python3.7/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py\", line 125, in __arrow_array__\r\n out = pa.array(cast_to_python_objects(self.data, only_1d_for_numpy=True), type=type)\r\n File \"pyarrow/array.pxi\", line 315, in pyarrow.lib.array\r\n File \"pyarrow/array.pxi\", line 39, in pyarrow.lib._sequence_to_array\r\n File \"pyarrow/error.pxi\", line 143, in pyarrow.lib.pyarrow_internal_check_status\r\n File \"pyarrow/error.pxi\", line 99, in pyarrow.lib.check_status\r\npyarrow.lib.ArrowInvalid: Could not convert 'in' with type str: tried to convert to boolean\r\n```\r\n\r\nEnvironment (datasets and pyarrow):\r\n\r\n```bash\r\n(promptsource) victor_huggingface_co@victor-dev:~/promptsource$ datasets-cli env\r\n\r\nCopy-and-paste the text below in your GitHub issue.\r\n\r\n- `datasets` version: 1.16.1\r\n- Platform: Linux-5.0.0-1020-gcp-x86_64-with-debian-buster-sid\r\n- Python version: 3.7.11\r\n- PyArrow version: 6.0.1\r\n```\r\n```bash\r\n(promptsource) victor_huggingface_co@victor-dev:~/promptsource$ pip show pyarrow\r\nName: pyarrow\r\nVersion: 6.0.1\r\nSummary: Python library for Apache Arrow\r\nHome-page: https://arrow.apache.org/\r\nAuthor: \r\nAuthor-email: \r\nLicense: Apache License, Version 2.0\r\nLocation: /home/victor_huggingface_co/miniconda3/envs/promptsource/lib/python3.7/site-packages\r\nRequires: numpy\r\nRequired-by: streamlit, datasets\r\n```" ]

[ { "color": "0e8a16", "default": false, "description": "Contribution to a dataset script", "id": 4564477500, "name": "dataset contribution", "node_id": "LA_kwDODunzps8AAAABEBBmPA", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/dataset%20contribution" } ]

[ "It shows below when I run test:\r\n\r\nFAILED tests/test_dataset_common.py::LocalDatasetTest::test_load_dataset_all_configs_msr_sqa - ValueError: Unknown split \"validation\". Should be one of ['train', 'test'].\r\n\r\nIt make no sense for me😂. \r\n", "@albertvillanova Does this PR has some additional fixes compared to https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/3771 or we can close it?", "@mariosasko besides the fix of the DuplicatedKeysError, this PR:\r\n- changes the reading of one of the files: use pandas instead of splitting by comma\r\n- changes the splits: modifying train and adding validation\r\n- adds some extra logic in the processing of the data: adding a new field \"question_and_history\"\r\n\r\nWe should decide whether validating these additional changes.\r\n- for example, if we accept as pertinent the addition of the field \"question_and_history\", this should be added as feature to the info, and the matadata should be regenerated...", "Hi guys, anything we can do to fix that bug👀? @mariosasko @albertvillanova @lhoestq ", "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._" ]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._", "<details>\n<summary>Show benchmarks</summary>\n\nPyArrow==6.0.0\n\n<details>\n<summary>Show updated benchmarks!</summary>\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json\n\n| metric | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_array2d | read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_array2d | read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_unformated after write_array2d | read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_unformated after write_nested_sequence | write_array2d | write_flattened_sequence | write_nested_sequence |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.008837 / 0.011353 (-0.002516) | 0.004608 / 0.011008 (-0.006400) | 0.101821 / 0.038508 (0.063312) | 0.030300 / 0.023109 (0.007191) | 0.301275 / 0.275898 (0.025377) | 0.365027 / 0.323480 (0.041547) | 0.007043 / 0.007986 (-0.000943) | 0.003493 / 0.004328 (-0.000835) | 0.078444 / 0.004250 (0.074194) | 0.036963 / 0.037052 (-0.000089) | 0.310510 / 0.258489 (0.052020) | 0.343769 / 0.293841 (0.049928) | 0.033560 / 0.128546 (-0.094986) | 0.011427 / 0.075646 (-0.064220) | 0.323542 / 0.419271 (-0.095730) | 0.043063 / 0.043533 (-0.000470) | 0.308869 / 0.255139 (0.053730) | 0.326436 / 0.283200 (0.043236) | 0.091775 / 0.141683 (-0.049908) | 1.471020 / 1.452155 (0.018865) | 1.494328 / 1.492716 (0.001612) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_getitem\\_100B.json\n\n| metric | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_random_rows | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_rows | get_first_row | get_last_row |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.009299 / 0.018006 (-0.008707) | 0.415705 / 0.000490 (0.415215) | 0.002406 / 0.000200 (0.002206) | 0.000066 / 0.000054 (0.000012) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json\n\n| metric | select | shard | shuffle | sort | train_test_split |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.022959 / 0.037411 (-0.014452) | 0.097111 / 0.014526 (0.082585) | 0.103399 / 0.176557 (-0.073157) | 0.144385 / 0.737135 (-0.592750) | 0.109069 / 0.296338 (-0.187269) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json\n\n| metric | read 5000 | read 50000 | read_batch 50000 10 | read_batch 50000 100 | read_batch 50000 1000 | read_formatted numpy 5000 | read_formatted pandas 5000 | read_formatted tensorflow 5000 | read_formatted torch 5000 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 | shuffled read 5000 | shuffled read 50000 | shuffled read_batch 50000 10 | shuffled read_batch 50000 100 | shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 | shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.417796 / 0.215209 (0.202587) | 4.158198 / 2.077655 (2.080543) | 1.862036 / 1.504120 (0.357916) | 1.650130 / 1.541195 (0.108936) | 1.717150 / 1.468490 (0.248660) | 0.691704 / 4.584777 (-3.893073) | 3.328254 / 3.745712 (-0.417458) | 1.850070 / 5.269862 (-3.419792) | 1.154331 / 4.565676 (-3.411346) | 0.082199 / 0.424275 (-0.342076) | 0.012226 / 0.007607 (0.004619) | 0.522491 / 0.226044 (0.296446) | 5.244181 / 2.268929 (2.975253) | 2.286651 / 55.444624 (-53.157973) | 1.954439 / 6.876477 (-4.922038) | 1.992052 / 2.142072 (-0.150020) | 0.804779 / 4.805227 (-4.000449) | 0.147341 / 6.500664 (-6.353323) | 0.063863 / 0.075469 (-0.011606) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json\n\n| metric | filter | map fast-tokenizer batched | map identity | map identity batched | map no-op batched | map no-op batched numpy | map no-op batched pandas | map no-op batched pytorch | map no-op batched tensorflow |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 1.270778 / 1.841788 (-0.571010) | 13.676378 / 8.074308 (5.602070) | 14.253498 / 10.191392 (4.062106) | 0.170748 / 0.680424 (-0.509676) | 0.028451 / 0.534201 (-0.505750) | 0.395034 / 0.579283 (-0.184249) | 0.407512 / 0.434364 (-0.026852) | 0.466740 / 0.540337 (-0.073598) | 0.564338 / 1.386936 (-0.822598) |\n\n</details>\nPyArrow==latest\n\n<details>\n<summary>Show updated benchmarks!</summary>\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json\n\n| metric | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_array2d | read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_array2d | read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_unformated after write_array2d | read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_unformated after write_nested_sequence | write_array2d | write_flattened_sequence | write_nested_sequence |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.006733 / 0.011353 (-0.004620) | 0.004635 / 0.011008 (-0.006373) | 0.075464 / 0.038508 (0.036956) | 0.027732 / 0.023109 (0.004623) | 0.343622 / 0.275898 (0.067724) | 0.380388 / 0.323480 (0.056908) | 0.005177 / 0.007986 (-0.002808) | 0.003435 / 0.004328 (-0.000893) | 0.074546 / 0.004250 (0.070296) | 0.039115 / 0.037052 (0.002063) | 0.342207 / 0.258489 (0.083718) | 0.390324 / 0.293841 (0.096483) | 0.031665 / 0.128546 (-0.096882) | 0.011695 / 0.075646 (-0.063951) | 0.085788 / 0.419271 (-0.333484) | 0.042423 / 0.043533 (-0.001110) | 0.340748 / 0.255139 (0.085609) | 0.372813 / 0.283200 (0.089614) | 0.092395 / 0.141683 (-0.049288) | 1.502158 / 1.452155 (0.050004) | 1.618233 / 1.492716 (0.125516) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_getitem\\_100B.json\n\n| metric | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_random_rows | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_rows | get_first_row | get_last_row |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.224451 / 0.018006 (0.206444) | 0.398712 / 0.000490 (0.398222) | 0.002739 / 0.000200 (0.002539) | 0.000074 / 0.000054 (0.000020) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json\n\n| metric | select | shard | shuffle | sort | train_test_split |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.025393 / 0.037411 (-0.012018) | 0.100480 / 0.014526 (0.085954) | 0.106913 / 0.176557 (-0.069644) | 0.148639 / 0.737135 (-0.588496) | 0.110098 / 0.296338 (-0.186240) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json\n\n| metric | read 5000 | read 50000 | read_batch 50000 10 | read_batch 50000 100 | read_batch 50000 1000 | read_formatted numpy 5000 | read_formatted pandas 5000 | read_formatted tensorflow 5000 | read_formatted torch 5000 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 | shuffled read 5000 | shuffled read 50000 | shuffled read_batch 50000 10 | shuffled read_batch 50000 100 | shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 | shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.439359 / 0.215209 (0.224150) | 4.396801 / 2.077655 (2.319146) | 2.069809 / 1.504120 (0.565689) | 1.851014 / 1.541195 (0.309820) | 1.885003 / 1.468490 (0.416513) | 0.701387 / 4.584777 (-3.883390) | 3.404943 / 3.745712 (-0.340769) | 1.874506 / 5.269862 (-3.395355) | 1.174925 / 4.565676 (-3.390752) | 0.083282 / 0.424275 (-0.340993) | 0.012352 / 0.007607 (0.004745) | 0.543058 / 0.226044 (0.317013) | 5.458186 / 2.268929 (3.189258) | 2.562159 / 55.444624 (-52.882466) | 2.198810 / 6.876477 (-4.677667) | 2.238976 / 2.142072 (0.096903) | 0.810958 / 4.805227 (-3.994269) | 0.153341 / 6.500664 (-6.347323) | 0.067773 / 0.075469 (-0.007696) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json\n\n| metric | filter | map fast-tokenizer batched | map identity | map identity batched | map no-op batched | map no-op batched numpy | map no-op batched pandas | map no-op batched pytorch | map no-op batched tensorflow |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 1.303938 / 1.841788 (-0.537850) | 14.170363 / 8.074308 (6.096055) | 13.727012 / 10.191392 (3.535620) | 0.129118 / 0.680424 (-0.551306) | 0.016746 / 0.534201 (-0.517455) | 0.382759 / 0.579283 (-0.196524) | 0.391070 / 0.434364 (-0.043294) | 0.461197 / 0.540337 (-0.079141) | 0.557641 / 1.386936 (-0.829295) |\n\n</details>\n</details>\n\n![](https://cml.dev/watermark.png#004bba88db03fb87d57252e38a4d7abdb0a5f0a9 \"CML watermark\")\n" ]

[]

[ "I've tried it and am getting the same error as you.\r\n\r\nYou could use the text files rather than the pickle:\r\n```\r\nhttps://www.dropbox.com/s/ikkqxfdbdec3fuj/test.txt\r\nhttps://www.dropbox.com/s/1pzkadrvffbqw6o/train.txt\r\nhttps://www.dropbox.com/s/2mzialpsgf9k5l3/val.txt\r\n```\r\n\r\nThen you would get all 3 splits rather than just the train split.", "Thanks a lot @ghomasHudson - silly me for not spotting that! \r\n\r\nI'll keep the PR open for now since I'm quite close to wrapping it up.", "Hi @ghomasHudson your suggestion worked like a charm - the PR is now ready for review 😎 ", "Hello, I probably have a silly question but the labels of the emotion dataset are in the form of numbers and not string, so I can not use the function classification_report because it mixes numbers and string (prediction). How can I access the label in the form of a string and not a number?\r\nThank you in advance.", "Hi @juliette-sch! Yes, I believe that having the labels as integers is now the default for many classification datasets. You can access the string label via the `ClassLabel.int2str` function ([docs](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/package_reference/main_classes.html?highlight=int2str#datasets.ClassLabel.int2str)), so you could add a new column to the dataset as follows:\r\n\r\n```python\r\nfrom datasets import load_dataset \r\n\r\nemotions = load_dataset(\"emotion\")\r\n\r\ndef label_int2str(row):\r\n return {\"label_name\": emotions[\"train\"].features[\"label\"].int2str(row[\"label\"])}\r\n\r\n# adds a new column called `label_name`\r\nemotions = emotions.map(label_int2str)\r\n```", "Great, thank you very much @lewtun !", "Hi, @lewtun \r\nWhen I load \"emotion\"\r\n```\r\nfrom datasets import load_dataset\r\n\r\nemotions = load_dataset(\"emotion\")\r\n```\r\n\r\nThere is an error:\r\n\r\n```\r\nConnectionError: Couldn't reach https://www.dropbox.com/s/1pzkadrvffbqw6o/train.txt?dl=1 (SSLError(MaxRetryError(\"HTTPSConnectionPool(host='www.dropbox.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /s/1pzkadrvffbqw6o/train.txt?dl=1 (Caused by SSLError(SSLCertVerificationError(1, '[SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: self signed certificate in certificate chain (_ssl.c:1091)')))\")))\r\n```\r\nCan you please tell me what is wrong?\r\n\r\nThanks a lot.\r\nDan", "Hi ! I could't reproduce the error, can you try again ? You can also try updating the `datasets` library and see if it fixes the issue", "Hi @lhoestq \r\n\r\nIt seems my company's internet blocked dropbox, I am sorry.\r\nThanks a lot.\r\n" ]

[]

[ "Does this mean the `FileNotFoundError` that avoids infinite loop can be removed?", "Yes, I think so...", "Or maybe we could leave it in case a relative path exceeds the MAX_PATH limit?", " > Or maybe we could leave it in case a relative path exceeds the MAX_PATH limit?\r\n\r\nWhat about converting relative paths to absolute?", "Nice ! Have you had a chance to test it on a windows machine with the max path limit enabled ? Afaik the CI doesn't have the path limit", "Sure @lhoestq: I've tested on my machine... And this fixes most of the tests... 😅 " ]

[]

[ "Hi @Arij-Aladel,\r\n\r\nYou are using a very old version of our library `datasets`: 1.8.0\r\nCurrent version is 2.0.0 (and the previous one was 1.18.4)\r\n\r\nPlease, try to update `datasets` library and check if the problem persists:\r\n```shell\r\n/env/bin/pip install -U datasets", "The problem I can no I have build my project on this version and old version on transformers. I have preprocessed the data again to use it. Thank for your reply" ]

[]

[ "Do you think we have a dedicated branch for all the changes we want to do to wikipedia ? Then once everything looks good + we have preprocessed the main languages, we can merge it on the `master` branch", "Yes, @lhoestq, I agree with you.\r\n\r\nI have just created the dedicated branch [`update-wikipedia`](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/tree/update-wikipedia). We can merge every PR (once validated) to that branch; once all changes are merged to that branch, we could create the preprocessed datasets and then merge the branch to master. ", "@lhoestq I guess you approve this PR?" ]

[]

[ "The `data_dir` parameter has been removed. Now the error is `ValueError: Config name is missing`\r\n\r\nAs mentioned in #470 I think we can have one test with the first config of BUILDER_CONFIGS, and another test that runs all of the configs in BUILDER_CONFIGS", "This was fixed in #527 \r\n\r\nClosing this one, but feel free to re-open if you have other questions" ]

[]

[]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._" ]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._", "<details>\n<summary>Show benchmarks</summary>\n\nPyArrow==8.0.0\n\n<details>\n<summary>Show updated benchmarks!</summary>\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json\n\n| metric | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_array2d | read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_array2d | read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_unformated after write_array2d | read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_unformated after write_nested_sequence | write_array2d | write_flattened_sequence | write_nested_sequence |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.008358 / 0.011353 (-0.002995) | 0.005673 / 0.011008 (-0.005335) | 0.124034 / 0.038508 (0.085526) | 0.037550 / 0.023109 (0.014441) | 0.331301 / 0.275898 (0.055403) | 0.383542 / 0.323480 (0.060062) | 0.006940 / 0.007986 (-0.001046) | 0.005959 / 0.004328 (0.001631) | 0.084670 / 0.004250 (0.080419) | 0.054214 / 0.037052 (0.017162) | 0.359897 / 0.258489 (0.101408) | 0.383260 / 0.293841 (0.089419) | 0.047642 / 0.128546 (-0.080904) | 0.013902 / 0.075646 (-0.061744) | 0.380232 / 0.419271 (-0.039040) | 0.077790 / 0.043533 (0.034257) | 0.376648 / 0.255139 (0.121509) | 0.387536 / 0.283200 (0.104336) | 0.104644 / 0.141683 (-0.037038) | 1.618560 / 1.452155 (0.166406) | 1.742569 / 1.492716 (0.249853) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_getitem\\_100B.json\n\n| metric | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_random_rows | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_rows | get_first_row | get_last_row |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.257218 / 0.018006 (0.239212) | 0.636801 / 0.000490 (0.636311) | 0.000634 / 0.000200 (0.000434) | 0.000101 / 0.000054 (0.000047) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json\n\n| metric | select | shard | shuffle | sort | train_test_split |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.037874 / 0.037411 (0.000462) | 0.107454 / 0.014526 (0.092928) | 0.117855 / 0.176557 (-0.058702) | 0.204067 / 0.737135 (-0.533068) | 0.134029 / 0.296338 (-0.162310) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json\n\n| metric | read 5000 | read 50000 | read_batch 50000 10 | read_batch 50000 100 | read_batch 50000 1000 | read_formatted numpy 5000 | read_formatted pandas 5000 | read_formatted tensorflow 5000 | read_formatted torch 5000 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 | shuffled read 5000 | shuffled read 50000 | shuffled read_batch 50000 10 | shuffled read_batch 50000 100 | shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 | shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.583657 / 0.215209 (0.368447) | 5.761289 / 2.077655 (3.683635) | 2.280201 / 1.504120 (0.776081) | 2.033442 / 1.541195 (0.492247) | 2.035343 / 1.468490 (0.566853) | 0.868122 / 4.584777 (-3.716655) | 5.352591 / 3.745712 (1.606879) | 2.432814 / 5.269862 (-2.837047) | 1.560765 / 4.565676 (-3.004911) | 0.098793 / 0.424275 (-0.325482) | 0.017327 / 0.007607 (0.009720) | 0.734676 / 0.226044 (0.508631) | 7.070318 / 2.268929 (4.801390) | 2.972701 / 55.444624 (-52.471924) | 2.442189 / 6.876477 (-4.434288) | 2.604379 / 2.142072 (0.462307) | 1.028853 / 4.805227 (-3.776374) | 0.210390 / 6.500664 (-6.290274) | 0.069329 / 0.075469 (-0.006140) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json\n\n| metric | filter | map fast-tokenizer batched | map identity | map identity batched | map no-op batched | map no-op batched numpy | map no-op batched pandas | map no-op batched pytorch | map no-op batched tensorflow |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 1.469586 / 1.841788 (-0.372202) | 16.570305 / 8.074308 (8.495997) | 19.187845 / 10.191392 (8.996453) | 0.219162 / 0.680424 (-0.461262) | 0.026356 / 0.534201 (-0.507845) | 0.447370 / 0.579283 (-0.131913) | 0.555893 / 0.434364 (0.121529) | 0.574958 / 0.540337 (0.034621) | 0.639166 / 1.386936 (-0.747770) |\n\n</details>\nPyArrow==latest\n\n<details>\n<summary>Show updated benchmarks!</summary>\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json\n\n| metric | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_array2d | read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_array2d | read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence | read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence | read_unformated after write_array2d | read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence | read_unformated after write_nested_sequence | write_array2d | write_flattened_sequence | write_nested_sequence |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.008166 / 0.011353 (-0.003187) | 0.005577 / 0.011008 (-0.005431) | 0.103578 / 0.038508 (0.065070) | 0.040563 / 0.023109 (0.017454) | 0.441996 / 0.275898 (0.166098) | 0.483594 / 0.323480 (0.160114) | 0.007329 / 0.007986 (-0.000657) | 0.004546 / 0.004328 (0.000218) | 0.090471 / 0.004250 (0.086220) | 0.052740 / 0.037052 (0.015688) | 0.442197 / 0.258489 (0.183708) | 0.524310 / 0.293841 (0.230469) | 0.042487 / 0.128546 (-0.086060) | 0.012917 / 0.075646 (-0.062730) | 0.103992 / 0.419271 (-0.315280) | 0.060570 / 0.043533 (0.017037) | 0.441956 / 0.255139 (0.186817) | 0.477084 / 0.283200 (0.193885) | 0.103815 / 0.141683 (-0.037868) | 1.696963 / 1.452155 (0.244809) | 1.747849 / 1.492716 (0.255132) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_getitem\\_100B.json\n\n| metric | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_random_rows | get_batch_of\\_1024\\_rows | get_first_row | get_last_row |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.292465 / 0.018006 (0.274458) | 0.571518 / 0.000490 (0.571028) | 0.000476 / 0.000200 (0.000276) | 0.000077 / 0.000054 (0.000022) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json\n\n| metric | select | shard | shuffle | sort | train_test_split |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.028697 / 0.037411 (-0.008714) | 0.111671 / 0.014526 (0.097145) | 0.138826 / 0.176557 (-0.037731) | 0.189697 / 0.737135 (-0.547439) | 0.125454 / 0.296338 (-0.170884) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json\n\n| metric | read 5000 | read 50000 | read_batch 50000 10 | read_batch 50000 100 | read_batch 50000 1000 | read_formatted numpy 5000 | read_formatted pandas 5000 | read_formatted tensorflow 5000 | read_formatted torch 5000 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 | shuffled read 5000 | shuffled read 50000 | shuffled read_batch 50000 10 | shuffled read_batch 50000 100 | shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 | shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 | shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 0.619273 / 0.215209 (0.404064) | 6.138669 / 2.077655 (4.061015) | 2.558622 / 1.504120 (1.054502) | 2.201550 / 1.541195 (0.660356) | 2.279034 / 1.468490 (0.810544) | 0.850752 / 4.584777 (-3.734025) | 5.438185 / 3.745712 (1.692473) | 2.529343 / 5.269862 (-2.740518) | 1.572178 / 4.565676 (-2.993499) | 0.100768 / 0.424275 (-0.323507) | 0.013902 / 0.007607 (0.006295) | 0.726660 / 0.226044 (0.500616) | 7.794918 / 2.268929 (5.525990) | 3.311695 / 55.444624 (-52.132930) | 2.729167 / 6.876477 (-4.147310) | 2.630984 / 2.142072 (0.488911) | 1.018534 / 4.805227 (-3.786693) | 0.194602 / 6.500664 (-6.306062) | 0.070876 / 0.075469 (-0.004593) |\n\n### Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json\n\n| metric | filter | map fast-tokenizer batched | map identity | map identity batched | map no-op batched | map no-op batched numpy | map no-op batched pandas | map no-op batched pytorch | map no-op batched tensorflow |\n|--------|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| new / old (diff) | 1.573005 / 1.841788 (-0.268783) | 17.042710 / 8.074308 (8.968401) | 19.615320 / 10.191392 (9.423928) | 0.229405 / 0.680424 (-0.451019) | 0.027560 / 0.534201 (-0.506641) | 0.447984 / 0.579283 (-0.131299) | 0.598392 / 0.434364 (0.164028) | 0.571769 / 0.540337 (0.031431) | 0.653025 / 1.386936 (-0.733911) |\n\n</details>\n</details>\n\n![](https://cml.dev/watermark.png#9dca2ff89a8589595313e9535d16597ce10e3700 \"CML watermark\")\n" ]

[ { "color": "d73a4a", "default": true, "description": "Something isn't working", "id": 1935892857, "name": "bug", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODU3", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/bug" } ]

[ "Thanks for reporting @conceptofmind.\r\n\r\nCould you please give details about your environment? \r\n```\r\n## Environment info\r\n<!-- You can run the command `datasets-cli env` and copy-and-paste its output below. -->\r\n- `datasets` version:\r\n- Platform:\r\n- Python version:\r\n- PyArrow version:\r\n```", "Hi @albertvillanova ,\r\n\r\nHere is the environment information:\r\n```\r\n- `datasets` version: 2.3.2\r\n- Platform: Linux-5.4.0-122-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.27\r\n- Python version: 3.9.12\r\n- PyArrow version: 7.0.0\r\n- Pandas version: 1.4.2\r\n```\r\nThanks,\r\n\r\nEnrico", "I think this issue is solved here https://discuss.huggingface.co/t/minhash-deduplication/19992/12?u=loubnabnl, this only happens for very large datasets we will update it in CodeParrot code", "Hi @loubnabnl,\r\n\r\nYes, the issue is solved in the discussion thread.\r\n\r\nI will close this issue.\r\n\r\nThank you again for all of your help.\r\n\r\nEnrico", "Thanks @loubnabnl for pointing out the solution to this issue." ]

[]

[ "Forgot to actually convert the feature dict to a Feature object. Closing." ]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[ "_The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged._" ]

[ { "color": "d73a4a", "default": true, "description": "Something isn't working", "id": 1935892857, "name": "bug", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODU3", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/bug" } ]

[ "Yes this was documented in the PR that added this hf->paperswithcode mapping (https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/2404) and AFAICT those are slightly distinct datasets so I think it's a wontfix\r\n\r\nFor context on the paperswithcode mapping you can also refer to https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/pull/43 which contains a lot of background discussion ", "Thanks for the antecedents. I close." ]

[]

[]

[]

[ "I have same issue for other datasets (`myanmar_news` in my case).\r\n\r\nA version of `datasets` runs correctly on my local machine (**without GPU**) which looking for the dataset at \r\n```\r\nhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/datasets/master/datasets/myanmar_news/myanmar_news.py\r\n```\r\n\r\nMeanwhile, other version runs on Colab (**with GPU**) failed to download the dataset. It try to find the dataset at `1.1.3` instead of `master` . If I disable GPU on my Colab, the code can load the dataset without any problem.\r\n\r\nMaybe there is some version missmatch with the GPU and CPU version of code for these datasets?", "It looks like they're two different issues\r\n\r\n----------\r\n\r\nFirst for `myanmar_news`: \r\n\r\nIt must come from the way you installed `datasets`.\r\nIf you install `datasets` from source, then the `myanmar_news` script will be loaded from `master`.\r\nHowever if you install from `pip` it will get it using the version of the lib (here `1.1.3`) and `myanmar_news` is not available in `1.1.3`.\r\n\r\nThe difference between your GPU and CPU executions must be the environment, one seems to have installed `datasets` from source and not the other.\r\n\r\n----------\r\n\r\nThen for `winogrande`:\r\n\r\nThe errors says that the url https://raw.githubusercontent.com/huggingface/datasets/1.1.3/datasets/winogrande/winogrande.py is not reachable.\r\nHowever it works fine on my side.\r\n\r\nDoes your machine have an internet connection ? Are connections to github blocked by some sort of proxy ?\r\nCan you also try again in case github had issues when you tried the first time ?\r\n" ]

[]

[ "Hi ! Thanks for reporting.\r\nThe same issue was reported in #730 (but with the encodings instead of the delimiter). It was fixed by #770 .\r\nThe fix will be available in the next release :)", "Thanks for the prompt reply and terribly sorry for the spam! \r\nLooking forward to the new release! " ]

[]

[ "Glad to have more Japanese data! Couple of comments:\r\n- the abbreviation might confuse some people as there is also an OPUS BSD corpus, would you mind renaming it as `bsd_ja_en`?\r\n- `flake8` is throwing some errors, you can run it locally (`flake8 datasets`) and fix what it tells you until it's happy :)\r\n- We're not using `os.path.join` for URLs as it's unstable across systems (introduces backslashes on Windows). Can you write the URLs explicitly instead?\r\n\r\nThanks!", "Fantastic, looks great!", "> Fantastic, looks great!\r\n\r\nThanks for your help @yjernite, really appreciate it!", "The RemoteDatasetTest is fixed on master so it's fine", "merging since the CI is fixed on master" ]

[ { "color": "a2eeef", "default": true, "description": "New feature or request", "id": 1935892871, "name": "enhancement", "node_id": "MDU6TGFiZWwxOTM1ODkyODcx", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/enhancement" } ]

[ "Hi! \r\n\r\nThis would be a nice addition to the Hub! You can find the existing chemistry datasets/models on the Hub (using the `chemistry` tag) [here](https://huggingface.co/search/full-text?q=chemistry&type=model&type=dataset).\r\n\r\nFeel free to ping us here on the Hub if you need help adding the datasets.\r\n" ]

[]

[ "Hi @lhoestq,\r\n\r\nShould I remove the 160 configurations? Is it too much?\r\n\r\nEDIT:\r\nCan you also check the task category? I'm not sure if there is an appropriate tag for the same.", "Thanks for the changes !\r\n\r\n> Should I remove the 160 configurations? Is it too much?\r\n\r\nYea 160 configuration is a lot.\r\nMaybe this dataset can work with parameters `type` and `task_no` ?\r\nYou can just remove the configuration in BUILDER_CONFIGS to only keep a few ones.\r\nAlso feel free to add an example in the dataset card of how to load the other configurations\r\n```\r\nload_dataset(\"babi_qa\", type=\"hn\", task_no=\"qa1\")\r\n```\r\nfor example, and with a list of the possible combinations.\r\n\r\n> Can you also check the task category? I'm not sure if there is an appropriate tag for the same.\r\n\r\nIt looks appropriate, thanks :)", "Hi @lhoestq \r\n\r\nI'm unable to test it locally using:\r\n```python\r\nload_dataset(\"datasets/babi_qa\", type=\"hn\", task_no=\"qa1\")\r\n```\r\nIt raises an error:\r\n```python\r\nTypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'type'\r\n```\r\nWill this be possible only after merging? Or am I missing something here?", "Can you try adding this class attribute to `BabiQa` ?\r\n```python\r\nBUILDER_CONFIG_CLASS = BabiQaConfig\r\n```\r\nThis should fix the TypeError issue you got", "My bad. Thanks a lot!", "Hi @lhoestq \r\n\r\nI have added the changes. Only the \"qa1\" task for each category is included. Also, I haven't removed the size categories and other description because I think it will still be useful. I have updated the line in README showing the example.\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\nGunjan", "Hi @lhoestq,\r\n\r\nDoes this look good now?" ]

[]

[ "The docs for this PR live [here](https://moon-ci-docs.huggingface.co/docs/datasets/pr_4866). All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint." ]

[ { "color": "E5583E", "default": false, "description": "Related to the dataset viewer on huggingface.co", "id": 3470211881, "name": "dataset-viewer", "node_id": "LA_kwDODunzps7O1zsp", "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/huggingface/datasets/labels/dataset-viewer" } ]