Update app.py

app.py

@@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ history = [
   "output: 1. intellectual free-riding\n2. cognitive outsourcing\n3. spectatorship",
   "input: n = 1\nas with any action, the rationale behind the iran nuclear deal withdrawal must be examined to assess its wisdom. in his own words, “this disastrous deal gave this regime many billions of dollars, some of it in actual cash — a great embarrassment to me as a citizen and to all citizens of the united states.” one could be forgiven for interpreting this statement to mean that american taxpayer dollars were being funneled directly into the coffers of the iranian government, with little to nothing in return. this, however, is a gross mischaracterization of events. the funds in question were rather tehran's own assets, previously frozen by sanctions. even if one were to grant for the sake of argument that such a financial outlay had indeed occurred, the suggestion that it would be sufficient grounds to justify scuttling the deal is highly suspect, particularly given the consequences of nuclear war. recall, again, the sheer scale of destruction it entails. from the obliteration of major population centers and widespread radiation poisoning to the ever-present risk of a tit-for-tat escalation culminating in humanity's extinction, the list of potential horrors is extensive. in a hypothetical world where the united states could avert this cataclysm by making a one-time payment equal to 0.27% of its 2015 gross domestic product, it would be a small price to pay for such a monumental return. if even this scenario, where the united states must actively transfer its wealth, is a worthwhile trade, [thing put into place ultimately; really good deal; not even have to give that over] ->",
   "output: 1. then surely the actual deal, which demanded no such concession, must be viewed as an absolute bargain.",
+  "input: n = 1\nin certain respects, labor unions do confer value beyond their workers' well-being and to the companies themselves. it stands to reason that, if wages, working conditions, and benefits are healthy, money-sinking nuisances will be drastically reduced. even so, i suspect management would much prefer to enact these conditions voluntarily than to perpetually worry about\n\nsteelman the employers' position. argue it as if you were jeff bezos. make unions look bad.",
+  "output: 1. militant employees aggressively exercising their disruptive power to extract crippling concessions.",
   "input: n = 1\n[free-flow structure]\n[joe biden has embraced; trump idea of tariffing canada; if not close its border; with jordan peterson wanting to move to the us being reason] ->",
   "output: 1. citing jordan peterson's expressed interest in immigrating to the united  states, joe biden has thrown his weight behind trump's proposal to tariff canada if it fails to seal its border.",
   "input: n = 1\n[free-flow structure]\n[caitlin clark getting recognition she deserves; messed up that; wnba players all up in arms over it] ->",