Update app.py

app.py

@@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ history = [
   "output: 1. months of election falsehoods",
   "input: n = 1\nelon musk's considerable wealth does not preclude [him wanting even more money] ->\n\nbe very concise. come off as negative.",
   "output: 1. further greed",
+  "input: n = 2\nin the popular imagination, north korea and capitalism exist in stark, mutually exclusive contrast. the supposed hard-line socialist republic, however, in reality operates in ways that belie this dichotomy. at the heart of this seeming contradiction are the country's special economic zones, in which the government invites foreign investment in select, designated areas. these pockets of economic liberalism have become a magnet for multinational corporations. indeed, such giants of the global economy as KIA and Samsung have planted their flags in the country's more capitalist soil. that said, the country is still far from a laissez-faire utopia. in its characteristic totalitarian fashion, the regime regularly confiscates the hard-won assets of its supposed partners\n\naccentuate the north korean government's lawlessness.",
+  "output: 1. without so much as a word of explanation\n2. without the pretense of due process",
+  "input: n = 3\nfor all their failings, traditional media outlets did have the benefit of a quality-control process that served as a bulwark against extremism. every article, broadcast, and editorial had to undergo multiple layers of scrutiny before receiving the coveted stamp of approval. in other words, the task of distilling reality from fiction fell to the professionals, sparing the common person from the need to invest in much critical thought of their own. as such, the public could be non-discriminating consumers of information and still remain reasonably immune to extremist manipulation. alas, those days of [not doing anything] ->\n\nplay into the fact that only highlights that people were not doing work themselves.",
+  "output: 1. intellectual free-riding\n2. cognitive outsourcing\n3. spectatorship",
   "input: n = 1\nas with any action, the rationale behind the iran nuclear deal withdrawal must be examined to assess its wisdom. in his own words, “this disastrous deal gave this regime many billions of dollars, some of it in actual cash — a great embarrassment to me as a citizen and to all citizens of the united states.” one could be forgiven for interpreting this statement to mean that american taxpayer dollars were being funneled directly into the coffers of the iranian government, with little to nothing in return. this, however, is a gross mischaracterization of events. the funds in question were rather tehran's own assets, previously frozen by sanctions. even if one were to grant for the sake of argument that such a financial outlay had indeed occurred, the suggestion that it would be sufficient grounds to justify scuttling the deal is highly suspect, particularly given the consequences of nuclear war. recall, again, the sheer scale of destruction it entails. from the obliteration of major population centers and widespread radiation poisoning to the ever-present risk of a tit-for-tat escalation culminating in humanity's extinction, the list of potential horrors is extensive. in a hypothetical world where the united states could avert this cataclysm by making a one-time payment equal to 0.27% of its 2015 gross domestic product, it would be a small price to pay for such a monumental return. if even this scenario, where the united states must actively transfer its wealth, is a worthwhile trade, [thing put into place ultimately; really good deal; not even have to give that over] ->",
   "output: 1. then surely the actual deal, which demanded no such concession, must be viewed as an absolute bargain.",
   "input: n = 1\n[free-flow structure]\n[joe biden has embraced; trump idea of tariffing canada; if not close its border; with jordan peterson wanting to move to the us being reason] ->",