post_id
stringlengths
5
7
domain
stringclasses
69 values
upvote_ratio
float64
0.5
1
history
stringlengths
11
39.7k
c_root_id_A
stringlengths
7
7
c_root_id_B
stringlengths
7
7
created_at_utc_A
int64
1.27B
1.68B
created_at_utc_B
int64
1.27B
1.68B
score_A
int64
-644
43.5k
score_B
int64
-2,846
43.5k
human_ref_A
stringlengths
0
18k
human_ref_B
stringlengths
0
13.6k
labels
int64
0
1
seconds_difference
float64
0
346M
score_ratio
float64
-2,292
2.5M
metadata_A
stringclasses
1 value
metadata_B
stringclasses
1 value
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0lk4p
il03pxp
1,660,960,915
1,660,952,582
4
3
Potsdam
Washington D.C. and Paris
1
8,333
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0lk4p
il06f90
1,660,960,915
1,660,953,816
4
3
Potsdam
London, then Tokyo
1
7,099
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0b4q0
il0lk4p
1,660,955,992
1,660,960,915
2
4
Portland
Potsdam
0
4,923
2
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il03pxp
il0qd5u
1,660,952,582
1,660,963,281
3
6
Washington D.C. and Paris
Istanbul steals hearts
0
10,699
2
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0qd5u
il06f90
1,660,963,281
1,660,953,816
6
3
Istanbul steals hearts
London, then Tokyo
1
9,465
2
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0b2qy
il0qd5u
1,660,955,967
1,660,963,281
4
6
I really can’t pick! Miami, New York City, Athens, Rome, (Ik basic lol)
Istanbul steals hearts
0
7,314
1.5
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0b4q0
il0qd5u
1,660,955,992
1,660,963,281
2
6
Portland
Istanbul steals hearts
0
7,289
3
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1ggz4
il0vzx2
1,660,979,758
1,660,966,189
5
4
Florence or Vienna
Montreal
1
13,569
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1m86e
il0vzx2
1,660,984,538
1,660,966,189
5
4
Amsterdam
Montreal
1
18,349
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0vzx2
il03pxp
1,660,966,189
1,660,952,582
4
3
Montreal
Washington D.C. and Paris
1
13,607
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il06f90
il0vzx2
1,660,953,816
1,660,966,189
3
4
London, then Tokyo
Montreal
0
12,373
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0b4q0
il0vzx2
1,660,955,992
1,660,966,189
2
4
Portland
Montreal
0
10,197
2
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1ggz4
il1g3bz
1,660,979,758
1,660,979,449
5
4
Florence or Vienna
Easily Florence (Firenze), Italy
1
309
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1m86e
il1g3bz
1,660,984,538
1,660,979,449
5
4
Amsterdam
Easily Florence (Firenze), Italy
1
5,089
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il03pxp
il1g3bz
1,660,952,582
1,660,979,449
3
4
Washington D.C. and Paris
Easily Florence (Firenze), Italy
0
26,867
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1g3bz
il06f90
1,660,979,449
1,660,953,816
4
3
Easily Florence (Firenze), Italy
London, then Tokyo
1
25,633
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0b4q0
il1g3bz
1,660,955,992
1,660,979,449
2
4
Portland
Easily Florence (Firenze), Italy
0
23,457
2
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il03pxp
il1ggz4
1,660,952,582
1,660,979,758
3
5
Washington D.C. and Paris
Florence or Vienna
0
27,176
1.666667
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il06f90
il1ggz4
1,660,953,816
1,660,979,758
3
5
London, then Tokyo
Florence or Vienna
0
25,942
1.666667
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0b2qy
il1ggz4
1,660,955,967
1,660,979,758
4
5
I really can’t pick! Miami, New York City, Athens, Rome, (Ik basic lol)
Florence or Vienna
0
23,791
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1bzbj
il1ggz4
1,660,976,257
1,660,979,758
4
5
Solely based off of where I have travelled to I would say my favourite so far has been Shimane, Japan for Mastue Castle and the preserved Samurai village surrounding it. It was like a childhood dream come true walking through everything.
Florence or Vienna
0
3,501
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1ggz4
il1f8hy
1,660,979,758
1,660,978,766
5
4
Florence or Vienna
Florence
1
992
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0b4q0
il1ggz4
1,660,955,992
1,660,979,758
2
5
Portland
Florence or Vienna
0
23,766
2.5
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il03pxp
il1m86e
1,660,952,582
1,660,984,538
3
5
Washington D.C. and Paris
Amsterdam
0
31,956
1.666667
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il06f90
il1m86e
1,660,953,816
1,660,984,538
3
5
London, then Tokyo
Amsterdam
0
30,722
1.666667
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1m86e
il0b2qy
1,660,984,538
1,660,955,967
5
4
Amsterdam
I really can’t pick! Miami, New York City, Athens, Rome, (Ik basic lol)
1
28,571
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1m86e
il1bzbj
1,660,984,538
1,660,976,257
5
4
Amsterdam
Solely based off of where I have travelled to I would say my favourite so far has been Shimane, Japan for Mastue Castle and the preserved Samurai village surrounding it. It was like a childhood dream come true walking through everything.
1
8,281
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1m86e
il1f8hy
1,660,984,538
1,660,978,766
5
4
Amsterdam
Florence
1
5,772
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1m86e
il1jfsu
1,660,984,538
1,660,982,210
5
4
Amsterdam
all-round, probably london. for a cohesive architectural showpiece, probably valletta
1
2,328
1.25
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1m86e
il0b4q0
1,660,984,538
1,660,955,992
5
2
Amsterdam
Portland
1
28,546
2.5
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0b2qy
il03pxp
1,660,955,967
1,660,952,582
4
3
I really can’t pick! Miami, New York City, Athens, Rome, (Ik basic lol)
Washington D.C. and Paris
1
3,385
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il03pxp
il1bzbj
1,660,952,582
1,660,976,257
3
4
Washington D.C. and Paris
Solely based off of where I have travelled to I would say my favourite so far has been Shimane, Japan for Mastue Castle and the preserved Samurai village surrounding it. It was like a childhood dream come true walking through everything.
0
23,675
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1f8hy
il03pxp
1,660,978,766
1,660,952,582
4
3
Florence
Washington D.C. and Paris
1
26,184
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1jfsu
il03pxp
1,660,982,210
1,660,952,582
4
3
all-round, probably london. for a cohesive architectural showpiece, probably valletta
Washington D.C. and Paris
1
29,628
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il06f90
il0b2qy
1,660,953,816
1,660,955,967
3
4
London, then Tokyo
I really can’t pick! Miami, New York City, Athens, Rome, (Ik basic lol)
0
2,151
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1bzbj
il06f90
1,660,976,257
1,660,953,816
4
3
Solely based off of where I have travelled to I would say my favourite so far has been Shimane, Japan for Mastue Castle and the preserved Samurai village surrounding it. It was like a childhood dream come true walking through everything.
London, then Tokyo
1
22,441
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il06f90
il1f8hy
1,660,953,816
1,660,978,766
3
4
London, then Tokyo
Florence
0
24,950
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1jfsu
il06f90
1,660,982,210
1,660,953,816
4
3
all-round, probably london. for a cohesive architectural showpiece, probably valletta
London, then Tokyo
1
28,394
1.333333
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1bzbj
il0b4q0
1,660,976,257
1,660,955,992
4
2
Solely based off of where I have travelled to I would say my favourite so far has been Shimane, Japan for Mastue Castle and the preserved Samurai village surrounding it. It was like a childhood dream come true walking through everything.
Portland
1
20,265
2
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il1f8hy
il0b4q0
1,660,978,766
1,660,955,992
4
2
Florence
Portland
1
22,774
2
wsrpyg
architecture_train
0.93
What is your favorite city? Obviously you like its architecture
il0b4q0
il1jfsu
1,660,955,992
1,660,982,210
2
4
Portland
all-round, probably london. for a cohesive architectural showpiece, probably valletta
0
26,218
2
un0kr0
architecture_train
0.94
What are the best websites for an architecture student to know? I have a list with Cadmapper, Streetmix, Mapbox Studio and a couple others that I wish I knew when I first started the graduation. I'm curious if you guys have any interesting websites to share that always helps you when modeling and doing research on the area of interest.
i855esv
i85gauy
1,652,241,525
1,652,248,220
2
3
Bimobject and SketchupTextures are my go to websites when building 3D models now. Learned about both after graduation and man would those have come in handy
Suckerpunch Daily to see what's coming out of other schools.
0
6,695
1.5
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6k3q3
el6jeiq
1,555,591,456
1,555,590,834
12
3
>it was incredibly radical for the time. Was it though? Renaissance architecture, while obviously innovative and influential, was also a revival of the classical tradition. If the Renaissance occurred in today’s architectural climate it would be labelled fake, revisionist pastiche ‘not fully reflective of the present’ because it purposefully harkens back to the architecture of a by-gone era. The original St Paul’s was also considerably more damaged than Notre Dame (i.e. totally destroyed).
Contemporary style is always a risk on these projects. It might turn out okay, or you might end up desecrating the symbol of an entire nation. So I hope whatever is chosen for the rebuild will be done tastefully.
1
622
4
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6lzf1
el7wabx
1,555,593,038
1,555,622,732
8
10
I’m just afraid that a completely different style would misinterpret the original under the guise of “being radical and unique”.
No because English Baroque is still visually appealing and interesting to look at. It is harmonious and people like it. Modernism is bland and ugly.
0
29,694
1.25
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el7wabx
el724bp
1,555,622,732
1,555,604,190
10
6
No because English Baroque is still visually appealing and interesting to look at. It is harmonious and people like it. Modernism is bland and ugly.
>If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built. [citation needed]
1
18,542
1.666667
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6jeiq
el7wabx
1,555,590,834
1,555,622,732
3
10
Contemporary style is always a risk on these projects. It might turn out okay, or you might end up desecrating the symbol of an entire nation. So I hope whatever is chosen for the rebuild will be done tastefully.
No because English Baroque is still visually appealing and interesting to look at. It is harmonious and people like it. Modernism is bland and ugly.
0
31,898
3.333333
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6q20s
el7wabx
1,555,596,136
1,555,622,732
3
10
>Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history XD
No because English Baroque is still visually appealing and interesting to look at. It is harmonious and people like it. Modernism is bland and ugly.
0
26,596
3.333333
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6yicb
el7wabx
1,555,601,795
1,555,622,732
3
10
ICOMOS recommends that the new to be differentiated from the old. Therein lies some issues. Various parts of some cathedrals were constructed perhaps hundreds of years apart. Reconstructions are always tricky and controversial. Not building it would highlight its damage. Building it exactly as it is would make the building look harmonious but as an architecture theory it can be controversial. A modern spire would contribute the narrative that parts of the building date from different periods. Windsor Castles roof was rebuilt slightly differently after the fire. It’s never an easy question.
No because English Baroque is still visually appealing and interesting to look at. It is harmonious and people like it. Modernism is bland and ugly.
0
20,937
3.333333
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el7wabx
el6q25c
1,555,622,732
1,555,596,138
10
1
No because English Baroque is still visually appealing and interesting to look at. It is harmonious and people like it. Modernism is bland and ugly.
Everyone tends to hate what is new and unfamiliar to them. No matter what is built, there will be a very large crowd that doesn’t like it and will moan about it, but then they will get on with their lives, maybe see it once in person, and never think about it again.
1
26,594
10
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el8cvyp
el6lzf1
1,555,635,241
1,555,593,038
9
8
Baroque is not to gothic as modernist is to tradition. Both gothic and Renaissance are tradition, which have the important things in common, whereas modernism does not. Modernism is a different category that has a different purpose. It is too difficult to build well like in the past, so the goal is to build for shock-value. It is more honest because we admit we can't do it like before and don't even try. The shock-value buildings are good for their purpose, but should not take over the real buildings of the past.
I’m just afraid that a completely different style would misinterpret the original under the guise of “being radical and unique”.
1
42,203
1.125
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6jeiq
el6lzf1
1,555,590,834
1,555,593,038
3
8
Contemporary style is always a risk on these projects. It might turn out okay, or you might end up desecrating the symbol of an entire nation. So I hope whatever is chosen for the rebuild will be done tastefully.
I’m just afraid that a completely different style would misinterpret the original under the guise of “being radical and unique”.
0
2,204
2.666667
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el8cvyp
el724bp
1,555,635,241
1,555,604,190
9
6
Baroque is not to gothic as modernist is to tradition. Both gothic and Renaissance are tradition, which have the important things in common, whereas modernism does not. Modernism is a different category that has a different purpose. It is too difficult to build well like in the past, so the goal is to build for shock-value. It is more honest because we admit we can't do it like before and don't even try. The shock-value buildings are good for their purpose, but should not take over the real buildings of the past.
>If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built. [citation needed]
1
31,051
1.5
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el8cvyp
el6jeiq
1,555,635,241
1,555,590,834
9
3
Baroque is not to gothic as modernist is to tradition. Both gothic and Renaissance are tradition, which have the important things in common, whereas modernism does not. Modernism is a different category that has a different purpose. It is too difficult to build well like in the past, so the goal is to build for shock-value. It is more honest because we admit we can't do it like before and don't even try. The shock-value buildings are good for their purpose, but should not take over the real buildings of the past.
Contemporary style is always a risk on these projects. It might turn out okay, or you might end up desecrating the symbol of an entire nation. So I hope whatever is chosen for the rebuild will be done tastefully.
1
44,407
3
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el8cvyp
el6q20s
1,555,635,241
1,555,596,136
9
3
Baroque is not to gothic as modernist is to tradition. Both gothic and Renaissance are tradition, which have the important things in common, whereas modernism does not. Modernism is a different category that has a different purpose. It is too difficult to build well like in the past, so the goal is to build for shock-value. It is more honest because we admit we can't do it like before and don't even try. The shock-value buildings are good for their purpose, but should not take over the real buildings of the past.
>Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history XD
1
39,105
3
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6yicb
el8cvyp
1,555,601,795
1,555,635,241
3
9
ICOMOS recommends that the new to be differentiated from the old. Therein lies some issues. Various parts of some cathedrals were constructed perhaps hundreds of years apart. Reconstructions are always tricky and controversial. Not building it would highlight its damage. Building it exactly as it is would make the building look harmonious but as an architecture theory it can be controversial. A modern spire would contribute the narrative that parts of the building date from different periods. Windsor Castles roof was rebuilt slightly differently after the fire. It’s never an easy question.
Baroque is not to gothic as modernist is to tradition. Both gothic and Renaissance are tradition, which have the important things in common, whereas modernism does not. Modernism is a different category that has a different purpose. It is too difficult to build well like in the past, so the goal is to build for shock-value. It is more honest because we admit we can't do it like before and don't even try. The shock-value buildings are good for their purpose, but should not take over the real buildings of the past.
0
33,446
3
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el8cvyp
el6q25c
1,555,635,241
1,555,596,138
9
1
Baroque is not to gothic as modernist is to tradition. Both gothic and Renaissance are tradition, which have the important things in common, whereas modernism does not. Modernism is a different category that has a different purpose. It is too difficult to build well like in the past, so the goal is to build for shock-value. It is more honest because we admit we can't do it like before and don't even try. The shock-value buildings are good for their purpose, but should not take over the real buildings of the past.
Everyone tends to hate what is new and unfamiliar to them. No matter what is built, there will be a very large crowd that doesn’t like it and will moan about it, but then they will get on with their lives, maybe see it once in person, and never think about it again.
1
39,103
9
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el8gbav
el724bp
1,555,637,923
1,555,604,190
7
6
The question is whether anybody today could do something to the cathedral that would add to its beauty. The answer has been studied statistically. In the past, the consensus was that old buildings could be improved, and the question was for which style or approach. Now the consensus is the opposite. The work that Viollet le Duc did was welcomed because it added value. If someone existed today that could do that, they would be the most famous person in the world.
>If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built. [citation needed]
1
33,733
1.166667
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6jeiq
el724bp
1,555,590,834
1,555,604,190
3
6
Contemporary style is always a risk on these projects. It might turn out okay, or you might end up desecrating the symbol of an entire nation. So I hope whatever is chosen for the rebuild will be done tastefully.
>If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built. [citation needed]
0
13,356
2
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el724bp
el6q20s
1,555,604,190
1,555,596,136
6
3
>If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built. [citation needed]
>Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history XD
1
8,054
2
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6yicb
el724bp
1,555,601,795
1,555,604,190
3
6
ICOMOS recommends that the new to be differentiated from the old. Therein lies some issues. Various parts of some cathedrals were constructed perhaps hundreds of years apart. Reconstructions are always tricky and controversial. Not building it would highlight its damage. Building it exactly as it is would make the building look harmonious but as an architecture theory it can be controversial. A modern spire would contribute the narrative that parts of the building date from different periods. Windsor Castles roof was rebuilt slightly differently after the fire. It’s never an easy question.
>If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built. [citation needed]
0
2,395
2
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el724bp
el6q25c
1,555,604,190
1,555,596,138
6
1
>If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built. [citation needed]
Everyone tends to hate what is new and unfamiliar to them. No matter what is built, there will be a very large crowd that doesn’t like it and will moan about it, but then they will get on with their lives, maybe see it once in person, and never think about it again.
1
8,052
6
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6jeiq
el8gbav
1,555,590,834
1,555,637,923
3
7
Contemporary style is always a risk on these projects. It might turn out okay, or you might end up desecrating the symbol of an entire nation. So I hope whatever is chosen for the rebuild will be done tastefully.
The question is whether anybody today could do something to the cathedral that would add to its beauty. The answer has been studied statistically. In the past, the consensus was that old buildings could be improved, and the question was for which style or approach. Now the consensus is the opposite. The work that Viollet le Duc did was welcomed because it added value. If someone existed today that could do that, they would be the most famous person in the world.
0
47,089
2.333333
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6q20s
el8gbav
1,555,596,136
1,555,637,923
3
7
>Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history XD
The question is whether anybody today could do something to the cathedral that would add to its beauty. The answer has been studied statistically. In the past, the consensus was that old buildings could be improved, and the question was for which style or approach. Now the consensus is the opposite. The work that Viollet le Duc did was welcomed because it added value. If someone existed today that could do that, they would be the most famous person in the world.
0
41,787
2.333333
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6yicb
el8gbav
1,555,601,795
1,555,637,923
3
7
ICOMOS recommends that the new to be differentiated from the old. Therein lies some issues. Various parts of some cathedrals were constructed perhaps hundreds of years apart. Reconstructions are always tricky and controversial. Not building it would highlight its damage. Building it exactly as it is would make the building look harmonious but as an architecture theory it can be controversial. A modern spire would contribute the narrative that parts of the building date from different periods. Windsor Castles roof was rebuilt slightly differently after the fire. It’s never an easy question.
The question is whether anybody today could do something to the cathedral that would add to its beauty. The answer has been studied statistically. In the past, the consensus was that old buildings could be improved, and the question was for which style or approach. Now the consensus is the opposite. The work that Viollet le Duc did was welcomed because it added value. If someone existed today that could do that, they would be the most famous person in the world.
0
36,128
2.333333
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el8gbav
el6q25c
1,555,637,923
1,555,596,138
7
1
The question is whether anybody today could do something to the cathedral that would add to its beauty. The answer has been studied statistically. In the past, the consensus was that old buildings could be improved, and the question was for which style or approach. Now the consensus is the opposite. The work that Viollet le Duc did was welcomed because it added value. If someone existed today that could do that, they would be the most famous person in the world.
Everyone tends to hate what is new and unfamiliar to them. No matter what is built, there will be a very large crowd that doesn’t like it and will moan about it, but then they will get on with their lives, maybe see it once in person, and never think about it again.
1
41,785
7
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6q25c
el6yicb
1,555,596,138
1,555,601,795
1
3
Everyone tends to hate what is new and unfamiliar to them. No matter what is built, there will be a very large crowd that doesn’t like it and will moan about it, but then they will get on with their lives, maybe see it once in person, and never think about it again.
ICOMOS recommends that the new to be differentiated from the old. Therein lies some issues. Various parts of some cathedrals were constructed perhaps hundreds of years apart. Reconstructions are always tricky and controversial. Not building it would highlight its damage. Building it exactly as it is would make the building look harmonious but as an architecture theory it can be controversial. A modern spire would contribute the narrative that parts of the building date from different periods. Windsor Castles roof was rebuilt slightly differently after the fire. It’s never an easy question.
0
5,657
3
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
el6q25c
elbrqwc
1,555,596,138
1,555,737,471
1
2
Everyone tends to hate what is new and unfamiliar to them. No matter what is built, there will be a very large crowd that doesn’t like it and will moan about it, but then they will get on with their lives, maybe see it once in person, and never think about it again.
No, because what matters is not the style itself but how the new one "marries" aesthetically with the old one. Simple as that, we have many ways of marrying different styles, just look at some churches and buildings (for example) in Prague. If you know how to respect and harmonize a futiristic spire with the centuries old gothic cathedral as a whole(not only harmonizing the styles) you can go head on, I would personally have no problems
0
141,333
2
bekqcl
architecture_train
0.64
[Ask] To all of the people opposed to a modern spire for Notre Dame: are you upset that Christopher Wren rebuilt St Paul’s cathedral in English Baroque style instead of the original Gothic? Wren’s St. Paul’s is, of course, one of the greatest works of art in history. But it was incredibly radical for the time. If traditionalists had their way, it would never have been built.
elbrzuj
el6q25c
1,555,737,724
1,555,596,138
2
1
Also, my dear remember that there is a much bigger similiarity between Brutalism and Modernism than Brutalism and Gothic. Such a comparison its almost, to use the heretic term in Arts, objetive to comprehend.
Everyone tends to hate what is new and unfamiliar to them. No matter what is built, there will be a very large crowd that doesn’t like it and will moan about it, but then they will get on with their lives, maybe see it once in person, and never think about it again.
1
141,586
2
twvkyg
architecture_train
0.88
Is there such a thing as an Architects Unions (USA) As a student I am very passionate about becoming an architect. Unfortunately, I abhor the apparent toxicity of the architectural job market. I am constantly hearing about and seeing horror stories about zero work to life balance and insane workloads when compared to compensation. It has had me wondering a lot about why there isn’t a general union for architects. Don’t get me wrong, I have no issue with hard work. I am in my mid-thirties and have worked for 20 years before deciding to go back to school. What I have an issue with is exploitative employment. I can’t stand that young architects receive such negligible compensation while enslaving themselves to unappreciative bosses.
i3i6jo3
i3igztc
1,649,174,353
1,649,178,489
5
10
There are a TON of Architects out there who are sole proprietorships, so that right there is going to be a roadblock to an industry wide union.
Architects definitely need some sort of union. Everyone on the jobsite gets paid more. drywaller, electrician, painter, everyone gets paid more. There was the sherman antitrust act which actually explains a lot. Check it out below https://www.architectmagazine.com/practice/a-better-value\_o
0
4,136
2
twvkyg
architecture_train
0.88
Is there such a thing as an Architects Unions (USA) As a student I am very passionate about becoming an architect. Unfortunately, I abhor the apparent toxicity of the architectural job market. I am constantly hearing about and seeing horror stories about zero work to life balance and insane workloads when compared to compensation. It has had me wondering a lot about why there isn’t a general union for architects. Don’t get me wrong, I have no issue with hard work. I am in my mid-thirties and have worked for 20 years before deciding to go back to school. What I have an issue with is exploitative employment. I can’t stand that young architects receive such negligible compensation while enslaving themselves to unappreciative bosses.
i3imo9b
i3ilssf
1,649,180,666
1,649,180,329
5
4
Every firm culture is different serving different markets and even different technologies. Some firms have small ownership groups and others are employee owned. It’s an employees market right now and you don’t have to suffer “required” 50+ hour weeks. Negative news tends to outpace positive news by 10 to 1 or more. There are good firms out there that desire their staff to have great work / life balance and more. Some staff are just masochists and get off on suffering or portraying the image that they are. Compensation, as a separate topic, is the result of architects willing to engage in a race to the bottom when it comes to fees and being lousy at generating new revenue stream outside of fee based services. Architecture can evolve but it seems it is easier to take the abuse and low pay for the reward of working in a creative profession.
Yes and no. Some government Architects are unionized. But private Architects getting together to fix prices is viewed as collusion.
1
337
1.25
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iyf0p3h
iye5p0r
1,669,846,649
1,669,834,535
6
1
Mine :-)
The one where they don't show up on site and chip in,badly.
1
12,114
6
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iyeejdd
iyf0p3h
1,669,837,977
1,669,846,649
1
6
I am working with Populous right now. It’s been a pleasure. They have their shit together.
Mine :-)
0
8,672
6
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iyei4yd
iyf0p3h
1,669,839,363
1,669,846,649
1
6
Any firm who courts wealthy and trusting clients!
Mine :-)
0
7,286
6
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iyf0p3h
iyeywby
1,669,846,649
1,669,845,890
6
1
Mine :-)
ghost in the shell
1
759
6
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iyf0p3h
iyekj4b
1,669,846,649
1,669,840,274
6
0
Mine :-)
For public structures I’m a fan of David m schwarz and Robert A. M. Stern but I don’t know many residential firms. Maybe Harrison design for that
1
6,375
6,000
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iyf0p3h
iyenr1s
1,669,846,649
1,669,841,509
6
1
Mine :-)
Probably Salmela Architect. Small firm in BFE, doing stunning, clean and modern designs with excellent execution.
1
5,140
6
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iyekj4b
iyeywby
1,669,840,274
1,669,845,890
0
1
For public structures I’m a fan of David m schwarz and Robert A. M. Stern but I don’t know many residential firms. Maybe Harrison design for that
ghost in the shell
0
5,616
1,000
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iyekj4b
iyenr1s
1,669,840,274
1,669,841,509
0
1
For public structures I’m a fan of David m schwarz and Robert A. M. Stern but I don’t know many residential firms. Maybe Harrison design for that
Probably Salmela Architect. Small firm in BFE, doing stunning, clean and modern designs with excellent execution.
0
1,235
1,000
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iygfo9t
iyekj4b
1,669,870,748
1,669,840,274
1
0
I would put Studio Gang in Chicago on my short list. Every project of theirs makes me go ooh and ahh!
For public structures I’m a fan of David m schwarz and Robert A. M. Stern but I don’t know many residential firms. Maybe Harrison design for that
1
30,474
1,000
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iykmqq8
iyekj4b
1,669,947,736
1,669,840,274
1
0
GOMA Taller, a Mexican-German studio whose projects has a really nice minimaisticl vibe.
For public structures I’m a fan of David m schwarz and Robert A. M. Stern but I don’t know many residential firms. Maybe Harrison design for that
1
107,462
1,000
z8zaxr
architecture_train
1
What is your favorite architecture firm? And why?
iyekj4b
iytrqa3
1,669,840,274
1,670,120,899
0
1
For public structures I’m a fan of David m schwarz and Robert A. M. Stern but I don’t know many residential firms. Maybe Harrison design for that
Looney Ricks Kiss, they designed the Rosemary Beach resort near Panama City Beach, FL. Known for their creative facades, every home in that development has an interesting door, Porte cochere, entry, or fence. There’s usually something to discover. I like to amble around right as the sun rises, looking and studying all the intracacies. And if you switch the names, it’s *KISS RICKS LOONEY* I love it.
0
280,625
1,000
p18pd6
architecture_train
0.96
What is your favourite architecture style from a game? For me I would go with: - Bioshock series - Dishonored series - Syberia series
h8bsrnz
h8cd8lf
1,628,540,321
1,628,549,406
5
7
Halo. Those forerunners and brutalism
Bloodborne's extreme Gothic. I can just stand still and look at the buildings in awe. So beautiful.
0
9,085
1.4
p18pd6
architecture_train
0.96
What is your favourite architecture style from a game? For me I would go with: - Bioshock series - Dishonored series - Syberia series
h8c4vqj
h8bsrnz
1,628,545,573
1,628,540,321
6
5
Dishonored is an A+ choice Prey and Control both have incredible architecture imo
Halo. Those forerunners and brutalism
1
5,252
1.2
p18pd6
architecture_train
0.96
What is your favourite architecture style from a game? For me I would go with: - Bioshock series - Dishonored series - Syberia series
h8bsrnz
h8d1swg
1,628,540,321
1,628,561,261
5
6
Halo. Those forerunners and brutalism
A lot of architecture in games is a bit surface-level, with the style manifesting mostly in detailing, not in the relationships between spaces, the experience of moving between them as they open and narrow, the vistas and so on. A very strong exception to this is the Witness, which has an open world that is an utter pleasure to navigate. There are a couple of interviews with the architects who worked on it here and here. Mirrors' Edge is also great, and I'm sure a lot of people discovered a love for classical European architecture via the Assassin's Creed games.
0
20,940
1.2
p18pd6
architecture_train
0.96
What is your favourite architecture style from a game? For me I would go with: - Bioshock series - Dishonored series - Syberia series
h8cd8lf
h8c4vqj
1,628,549,406
1,628,545,573
7
6
Bloodborne's extreme Gothic. I can just stand still and look at the buildings in awe. So beautiful.
Dishonored is an A+ choice Prey and Control both have incredible architecture imo
1
3,833
1.166667
p18pd6
architecture_train
0.96
What is your favourite architecture style from a game? For me I would go with: - Bioshock series - Dishonored series - Syberia series
h8clk7t
h8d1swg
1,628,553,408
1,628,561,261
2
6
Slightly different answer, but I think the Ravnica cityscape from the card game, Magic the Gathering is pretty spectacular. It's very Gothic-inspired but with a lot of different aspects incorporated that help represent each of the different guilds that reside in it. There's also a fantastic video digging into it for anyone with half an hour to spare
A lot of architecture in games is a bit surface-level, with the style manifesting mostly in detailing, not in the relationships between spaces, the experience of moving between them as they open and narrow, the vistas and so on. A very strong exception to this is the Witness, which has an open world that is an utter pleasure to navigate. There are a couple of interviews with the architects who worked on it here and here. Mirrors' Edge is also great, and I'm sure a lot of people discovered a love for classical European architecture via the Assassin's Creed games.
0
7,853
3
p18pd6
architecture_train
0.96
What is your favourite architecture style from a game? For me I would go with: - Bioshock series - Dishonored series - Syberia series
h8cnp7w
h8d1swg
1,628,554,446
1,628,561,261
2
6
Deus Ex, Half-Life 2, Dishonored have beautiful architectural styles.
A lot of architecture in games is a bit surface-level, with the style manifesting mostly in detailing, not in the relationships between spaces, the experience of moving between them as they open and narrow, the vistas and so on. A very strong exception to this is the Witness, which has an open world that is an utter pleasure to navigate. There are a couple of interviews with the architects who worked on it here and here. Mirrors' Edge is also great, and I'm sure a lot of people discovered a love for classical European architecture via the Assassin's Creed games.
0
6,815
3
p18pd6
architecture_train
0.96
What is your favourite architecture style from a game? For me I would go with: - Bioshock series - Dishonored series - Syberia series
h8du3f2
h8dpo4j
1,628,579,069
1,628,575,502
2
1
Control. The brutalism and the transition between spaces is just amazing!
Minecraft.... Uhhhhh
1
3,567
2
8yoos0
architecture_train
0.86
[ask] What would city architecture look like in a world inhabited by birds? If we were to be in a universe where birds are the sentient species where there was never a need for the carriage or car, how would city architecture look? Some other variables come into play though like the fact that birds need takeoff space and space to fly in between buildings.
e2ddcbs
e2d1pi6
1,531,567,689
1,531,544,557
10
5
Birds don't need jobs because they rely on survival of the fittest rather than property rights to distribute resources. Therefore they would not need cities but rather vibrant wild ecosystems. Also even the cleverest birds are unable to operate a cement mixer.
I'm no expert, but I've seen my fair share of bird houses. I would expect a lot of shoddily built wood structures, with round holes and no doors or windows.
1
23,132
2
8yoos0
architecture_train
0.86
[ask] What would city architecture look like in a world inhabited by birds? If we were to be in a universe where birds are the sentient species where there was never a need for the carriage or car, how would city architecture look? Some other variables come into play though like the fact that birds need takeoff space and space to fly in between buildings.
e2ddcbs
e2da14p
1,531,567,689
1,531,560,361
10
6
Birds don't need jobs because they rely on survival of the fittest rather than property rights to distribute resources. Therefore they would not need cities but rather vibrant wild ecosystems. Also even the cleverest birds are unable to operate a cement mixer.
Like this
1
7,328
1.666667
8yoos0
architecture_train
0.86
[ask] What would city architecture look like in a world inhabited by birds? If we were to be in a universe where birds are the sentient species where there was never a need for the carriage or car, how would city architecture look? Some other variables come into play though like the fact that birds need takeoff space and space to fly in between buildings.
e2d8u32
e2ddcbs
1,531,557,560
1,531,567,689
5
10
Probably like Beijings Olympic stadium
Birds don't need jobs because they rely on survival of the fittest rather than property rights to distribute resources. Therefore they would not need cities but rather vibrant wild ecosystems. Also even the cleverest birds are unable to operate a cement mixer.
0
10,129
2
8yoos0
architecture_train
0.86
[ask] What would city architecture look like in a world inhabited by birds? If we were to be in a universe where birds are the sentient species where there was never a need for the carriage or car, how would city architecture look? Some other variables come into play though like the fact that birds need takeoff space and space to fly in between buildings.
e2d1pi6
e2da14p
1,531,544,557
1,531,560,361
5
6
I'm no expert, but I've seen my fair share of bird houses. I would expect a lot of shoddily built wood structures, with round holes and no doors or windows.
Like this
0
15,804
1.2
8yoos0
architecture_train
0.86
[ask] What would city architecture look like in a world inhabited by birds? If we were to be in a universe where birds are the sentient species where there was never a need for the carriage or car, how would city architecture look? Some other variables come into play though like the fact that birds need takeoff space and space to fly in between buildings.
e2d8u32
e2da14p
1,531,557,560
1,531,560,361
5
6
Probably like Beijings Olympic stadium
Like this
0
2,801
1.2
ylod1r
architecture_train
0.9
is there a 3d architecture design game or anything Hello I am looking for a 3d architecture design game or anything to help me with architecture.it would help me get my ideas in to my work better because 2d draws are not helping r/architecture please help me
iv15mk4
iv1lk0k
1,667,572,923
1,667,579,225
3
5
Unreal Engine and Unity are both game software engines that are being used extensively in architecture. In many cases, they're just being used for simplistic immersive visualizations but their potential as creative design tools is much greater
Minecraft?
0
6,302
1.666667
ylod1r
architecture_train
0.9
is there a 3d architecture design game or anything Hello I am looking for a 3d architecture design game or anything to help me with architecture.it would help me get my ideas in to my work better because 2d draws are not helping r/architecture please help me
iv0qj1w
iv1lk0k
1,667,566,246
1,667,579,225
2
5
SketchUp also has a free online version.
Minecraft?
0
12,979
2.5
ylod1r
architecture_train
0.9
is there a 3d architecture design game or anything Hello I am looking for a 3d architecture design game or anything to help me with architecture.it would help me get my ideas in to my work better because 2d draws are not helping r/architecture please help me
iv0h3yj
iv1lk0k
1,667,560,927
1,667,579,225
1
5
There aren’t really any architecture games. Sketch in 3 dimensions and study good architecture. Grasshopper and blender are useful for form-finding if logic and formulaic design is more your thing.
Minecraft?
0
18,298
5
ylod1r
architecture_train
0.9
is there a 3d architecture design game or anything Hello I am looking for a 3d architecture design game or anything to help me with architecture.it would help me get my ideas in to my work better because 2d draws are not helping r/architecture please help me
iv0832s
iv1lk0k
1,667,554,057
1,667,579,225
1
5
Revit
Minecraft?
0
25,168
5
ylod1r
architecture_train
0.9
is there a 3d architecture design game or anything Hello I am looking for a 3d architecture design game or anything to help me with architecture.it would help me get my ideas in to my work better because 2d draws are not helping r/architecture please help me
iv0qj1w
iv15mk4
1,667,566,246
1,667,572,923
2
3
SketchUp also has a free online version.
Unreal Engine and Unity are both game software engines that are being used extensively in architecture. In many cases, they're just being used for simplistic immersive visualizations but their potential as creative design tools is much greater
0
6,677
1.5
ylod1r
architecture_train
0.9
is there a 3d architecture design game or anything Hello I am looking for a 3d architecture design game or anything to help me with architecture.it would help me get my ideas in to my work better because 2d draws are not helping r/architecture please help me
iv15mk4
iv0h3yj
1,667,572,923
1,667,560,927
3
1
Unreal Engine and Unity are both game software engines that are being used extensively in architecture. In many cases, they're just being used for simplistic immersive visualizations but their potential as creative design tools is much greater
There aren’t really any architecture games. Sketch in 3 dimensions and study good architecture. Grasshopper and blender are useful for form-finding if logic and formulaic design is more your thing.
1
11,996
3
ylod1r
architecture_train
0.9
is there a 3d architecture design game or anything Hello I am looking for a 3d architecture design game or anything to help me with architecture.it would help me get my ideas in to my work better because 2d draws are not helping r/architecture please help me
iv15mk4
iv0832s
1,667,572,923
1,667,554,057
3
1
Unreal Engine and Unity are both game software engines that are being used extensively in architecture. In many cases, they're just being used for simplistic immersive visualizations but their potential as creative design tools is much greater
Revit
1
18,866
3