Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset3

like 0

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time" ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend" ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol" ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?" ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak" ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances.", ">\n\nQuestion is! How to make strong relationship?" ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances.", ">\n\nQuestion is! How to make strong relationship?", ">\n\nIn my opinion, a strong relationship is created when both people can trust each other, have the same ethical values and know what love truly is. No other person can destroy a relationship like this." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances.", ">\n\nQuestion is! How to make strong relationship?", ">\n\nIn my opinion, a strong relationship is created when both people can trust each other, have the same ethical values and know what love truly is. No other person can destroy a relationship like this.", ">\n\nThey also have to be right for each other. I don't think love can be created when it's not there." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances.", ">\n\nQuestion is! How to make strong relationship?", ">\n\nIn my opinion, a strong relationship is created when both people can trust each other, have the same ethical values and know what love truly is. No other person can destroy a relationship like this.", ">\n\nThey also have to be right for each other. I don't think love can be created when it's not there.", ">\n\nWrong! This is a very childish way to understand relationships - they're NOT that simple.\nYour entire post just reeks of someone who cheated emotionally or physically, and won't own it." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances.", ">\n\nQuestion is! How to make strong relationship?", ">\n\nIn my opinion, a strong relationship is created when both people can trust each other, have the same ethical values and know what love truly is. No other person can destroy a relationship like this.", ">\n\nThey also have to be right for each other. I don't think love can be created when it's not there.", ">\n\nWrong! This is a very childish way to understand relationships - they're NOT that simple.\nYour entire post just reeks of someone who cheated emotionally or physically, and won't own it.", ">\n\nHahah! I have never been in a relationship/ neither cheated on someone! Look at how many people agree with me i don’t care about u calling me childish\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most, but them. How do i sound like i cheated on someone? Make it make sense" ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances.", ">\n\nQuestion is! How to make strong relationship?", ">\n\nIn my opinion, a strong relationship is created when both people can trust each other, have the same ethical values and know what love truly is. No other person can destroy a relationship like this.", ">\n\nThey also have to be right for each other. I don't think love can be created when it's not there.", ">\n\nWrong! This is a very childish way to understand relationships - they're NOT that simple.\nYour entire post just reeks of someone who cheated emotionally or physically, and won't own it.", ">\n\nHahah! I have never been in a relationship/ neither cheated on someone! Look at how many people agree with me i don’t care about u calling me childish\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most, but them. How do i sound like i cheated on someone? Make it make sense", ">\n\nDepends" ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances.", ">\n\nQuestion is! How to make strong relationship?", ">\n\nIn my opinion, a strong relationship is created when both people can trust each other, have the same ethical values and know what love truly is. No other person can destroy a relationship like this.", ">\n\nThey also have to be right for each other. I don't think love can be created when it's not there.", ">\n\nWrong! This is a very childish way to understand relationships - they're NOT that simple.\nYour entire post just reeks of someone who cheated emotionally or physically, and won't own it.", ">\n\nHahah! I have never been in a relationship/ neither cheated on someone! Look at how many people agree with me i don’t care about u calling me childish\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most, but them. How do i sound like i cheated on someone? Make it make sense", ">\n\nDepends", ">\n\nAgree, and sometimes two people aren't a match and it would have never worked regardless of the third person.\nAlso, very often a relationship is already over when the third person comes along. Sometimes the affair is just a way to recognise the relationship is dead and the cheater doesn't even end up with that person afterwards.\nAnd it is not true the person who cheated is incapable of being in a happy committed relationship, whether with the third person or someone else.\nAll of these seem to be verrrry unpopular takes on the Internet although in real life they all happen." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances.", ">\n\nQuestion is! How to make strong relationship?", ">\n\nIn my opinion, a strong relationship is created when both people can trust each other, have the same ethical values and know what love truly is. No other person can destroy a relationship like this.", ">\n\nThey also have to be right for each other. I don't think love can be created when it's not there.", ">\n\nWrong! This is a very childish way to understand relationships - they're NOT that simple.\nYour entire post just reeks of someone who cheated emotionally or physically, and won't own it.", ">\n\nHahah! I have never been in a relationship/ neither cheated on someone! Look at how many people agree with me i don’t care about u calling me childish\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most, but them. How do i sound like i cheated on someone? Make it make sense", ">\n\nDepends", ">\n\nAgree, and sometimes two people aren't a match and it would have never worked regardless of the third person.\nAlso, very often a relationship is already over when the third person comes along. Sometimes the affair is just a way to recognise the relationship is dead and the cheater doesn't even end up with that person afterwards.\nAnd it is not true the person who cheated is incapable of being in a happy committed relationship, whether with the third person or someone else.\nAll of these seem to be verrrry unpopular takes on the Internet although in real life they all happen.", ">\n\n\nAgree, and sometimes two people aren't a match and it would have never worked regardless of the third person.\n\nThis is an incredibly shit take." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances.", ">\n\nQuestion is! How to make strong relationship?", ">\n\nIn my opinion, a strong relationship is created when both people can trust each other, have the same ethical values and know what love truly is. No other person can destroy a relationship like this.", ">\n\nThey also have to be right for each other. I don't think love can be created when it's not there.", ">\n\nWrong! This is a very childish way to understand relationships - they're NOT that simple.\nYour entire post just reeks of someone who cheated emotionally or physically, and won't own it.", ">\n\nHahah! I have never been in a relationship/ neither cheated on someone! Look at how many people agree with me i don’t care about u calling me childish\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most, but them. How do i sound like i cheated on someone? Make it make sense", ">\n\nDepends", ">\n\nAgree, and sometimes two people aren't a match and it would have never worked regardless of the third person.\nAlso, very often a relationship is already over when the third person comes along. Sometimes the affair is just a way to recognise the relationship is dead and the cheater doesn't even end up with that person afterwards.\nAnd it is not true the person who cheated is incapable of being in a happy committed relationship, whether with the third person or someone else.\nAll of these seem to be verrrry unpopular takes on the Internet although in real life they all happen.", ">\n\n\nAgree, and sometimes two people aren't a match and it would have never worked regardless of the third person.\n\nThis is an incredibly shit take.", ">\n\nI need to ask my wife's boyfriend about this." ]

[ "There is a ton of a nuance in these situations. Redditors view everything in relationships as too black and white.", ">\n\nIt's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they?", ">\n\nSHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend.", ">\n\nSome even blame themselves that they weren't good enough.", ">\n\nWhich can be right.", ">\n\nDisagree. If your partner isn't enough - whatever that means for you - have the decency of ending the realtionship and spare them the emotional damage unfaithfulness causes.", ">\n\nI think a lot of relationships are weak BTW. \nLike, you don't have six pac anymore, cancel. We don't have sex weekly anymore, cancel. You couldn't read my mind, cancel. You don't let me go on cruise with my \"bff\" without you, you are so co-defendant, red flag, cancel. You don't want to sign prenup, cancel.", ">\n\nIs this unpopular? Seems pretty common sense to me. Not that the third party is blameless (unless they didn’t know), but if someone cheats or gets close to doing so, obviously there is something quite off either with the relationship or the person.", ">\n\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most,", ">\n\nThat just proves they didn't find the right person. Like cheating is such a big part of our culture and I don't know why. If someone truly loves you they wouldn't trade you for anything.Most people can't commit, or are scared to. \nRelationships take hard work and dedication it's not all sunshine and lolipops.we think relationships are like movie cliches always being perfect with no struggles. Good couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.", ">\n\n\nGood couples work it out, bad couples don't, simple as that.\n\nI think this is a one-dimensional version of how a couple can be good or bad. There are very terrible couples who make it through a lifetime and, by most societal metrics, could be considered \"successful marriages\" just by never facing the right stress test.\nThere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much. \nTo say that failure in those situations must mean it was a \"bad couple\"/ the notion that one \"just needs to find the right person\" is more this esoterical thinking that there is some kind of fate/ justice out there. \nIt's too romanticised and ambitious a bar for being a \"good couple\" that there would be no challenge in the world they could not overcome.", ">\n\n\nthere are couples that match very well but get thrown a curveball by life, like miscarriage or mental illness - maybe at a point where money is low and its just too much.\n\nGood couples make it through those things all the time", ">\n\nYes!!! It's always the girlfriend and the mistress tearing each others hair out when they SHOULD be teaming up against the shitty boyfriend", ">\n\nYeah people can’t put 2 & 2 together lol", ">\n\nUndeniably true! \nMost people don't also believe this?", ">\n\nIt fully depends on the context \nIf the 3rd knew they were in a relationship then blame belongs in atleast some part on them\nYes people cheat because of other issues in the relationship that doesn’t make the relationship weak", ">\n\nNo. If you or your partner would cheat because of a third person, the relationship is obviously weak. People in a good, healthy relationship don't cheat.\nIt's also not the relationship being good or bad - it's the people's fault for cheating. A smart adult will break up if it's not working.", ">\n\nPeople can’t just come and go from relationships like you think here on reddit. Sometimes there is a marriage, kids, a mortgage, maybe complex emotions and issues brewing under the surface. It’s not always just a matter of breaking up every time your feelings change.", ">\n\nSo you're justifying cheating.", ">\n\nNot at all, just explaining to you and the others on reddit who think these situations are simply that easy are extremely naive.", ">\n\nBut you are. I said that if you feel like cheating you get out of the relationship first. Your response was that it's not as easy - true - in relation to whether cheating is acceptable, meaning you just said it is.\nNot saying it's easy. I'm saying a person of integrity wouldn't cheat under any circumstances.", ">\n\nQuestion is! How to make strong relationship?", ">\n\nIn my opinion, a strong relationship is created when both people can trust each other, have the same ethical values and know what love truly is. No other person can destroy a relationship like this.", ">\n\nThey also have to be right for each other. I don't think love can be created when it's not there.", ">\n\nWrong! This is a very childish way to understand relationships - they're NOT that simple.\nYour entire post just reeks of someone who cheated emotionally or physically, and won't own it.", ">\n\nHahah! I have never been in a relationship/ neither cheated on someone! Look at how many people agree with me i don’t care about u calling me childish\nAlso, instead of sounding like an idiot, my point is that if ur partner cheated on u it’s not the third person to blame the most, but them. How do i sound like i cheated on someone? Make it make sense", ">\n\nDepends", ">\n\nAgree, and sometimes two people aren't a match and it would have never worked regardless of the third person.\nAlso, very often a relationship is already over when the third person comes along. Sometimes the affair is just a way to recognise the relationship is dead and the cheater doesn't even end up with that person afterwards.\nAnd it is not true the person who cheated is incapable of being in a happy committed relationship, whether with the third person or someone else.\nAll of these seem to be verrrry unpopular takes on the Internet although in real life they all happen.", ">\n\n\nAgree, and sometimes two people aren't a match and it would have never worked regardless of the third person.\n\nThis is an incredibly shit take.", ">\n\nI need to ask my wife's boyfriend about this.", ">\n\noh…" ]

[]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing." ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people." ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people.", ">\n\nSmells like when the inventors of insulin gave away the patent for $1 out of concern for humanity only to have the drug companies rape diabetes patients with it ever since." ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people.", ">\n\nSmells like when the inventors of insulin gave away the patent for $1 out of concern for humanity only to have the drug companies rape diabetes patients with it ever since.", ">\n\nPeople keep saying how free vaccines are test beds for pharmaceuticals. So they’re just going to start charging for the same vaccines so people who’s too stupid to notice to think they’re releasing a finished product.\nWe have extremely twisted mental gymnastics towards things offered for free." ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people.", ">\n\nSmells like when the inventors of insulin gave away the patent for $1 out of concern for humanity only to have the drug companies rape diabetes patients with it ever since.", ">\n\nPeople keep saying how free vaccines are test beds for pharmaceuticals. So they’re just going to start charging for the same vaccines so people who’s too stupid to notice to think they’re releasing a finished product.\nWe have extremely twisted mental gymnastics towards things offered for free.", ">\n\nYou should ALWAYS consider why something is free.\nYou should NOT let conspiracy theories about why something is free override any common sense and drive your actions.\nVaccine is free, why is that?\nBecause both government and business recognize that a highly contagious disease among their workers and constituents is bad for business.\nWhy is Facebook free?\nSo that huge numbers of people will generate incredible amounts of data for connecting suppliers and consumers via targeted ads.\nIf something is free, you are the commodity." ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people.", ">\n\nSmells like when the inventors of insulin gave away the patent for $1 out of concern for humanity only to have the drug companies rape diabetes patients with it ever since.", ">\n\nPeople keep saying how free vaccines are test beds for pharmaceuticals. So they’re just going to start charging for the same vaccines so people who’s too stupid to notice to think they’re releasing a finished product.\nWe have extremely twisted mental gymnastics towards things offered for free.", ">\n\nYou should ALWAYS consider why something is free.\nYou should NOT let conspiracy theories about why something is free override any common sense and drive your actions.\nVaccine is free, why is that?\nBecause both government and business recognize that a highly contagious disease among their workers and constituents is bad for business.\nWhy is Facebook free?\nSo that huge numbers of people will generate incredible amounts of data for connecting suppliers and consumers via targeted ads.\nIf something is free, you are the commodity.", ">\n\nBut its not free, its just being paid for by their taxes that they hate paying. They are just too dense to think past their own butthole" ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people.", ">\n\nSmells like when the inventors of insulin gave away the patent for $1 out of concern for humanity only to have the drug companies rape diabetes patients with it ever since.", ">\n\nPeople keep saying how free vaccines are test beds for pharmaceuticals. So they’re just going to start charging for the same vaccines so people who’s too stupid to notice to think they’re releasing a finished product.\nWe have extremely twisted mental gymnastics towards things offered for free.", ">\n\nYou should ALWAYS consider why something is free.\nYou should NOT let conspiracy theories about why something is free override any common sense and drive your actions.\nVaccine is free, why is that?\nBecause both government and business recognize that a highly contagious disease among their workers and constituents is bad for business.\nWhy is Facebook free?\nSo that huge numbers of people will generate incredible amounts of data for connecting suppliers and consumers via targeted ads.\nIf something is free, you are the commodity.", ">\n\nBut its not free, its just being paid for by their taxes that they hate paying. They are just too dense to think past their own butthole", ">\n\nAlso displays how non-competitive the markets are. If one guy raising the price causes the rest of the makers to match that price, there's no competition. In a competitive market, raising the price this much would be a death knell for a corporation. The other suppliers should maintain the government price and then take all of Pfizers sales." ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people.", ">\n\nSmells like when the inventors of insulin gave away the patent for $1 out of concern for humanity only to have the drug companies rape diabetes patients with it ever since.", ">\n\nPeople keep saying how free vaccines are test beds for pharmaceuticals. So they’re just going to start charging for the same vaccines so people who’s too stupid to notice to think they’re releasing a finished product.\nWe have extremely twisted mental gymnastics towards things offered for free.", ">\n\nYou should ALWAYS consider why something is free.\nYou should NOT let conspiracy theories about why something is free override any common sense and drive your actions.\nVaccine is free, why is that?\nBecause both government and business recognize that a highly contagious disease among their workers and constituents is bad for business.\nWhy is Facebook free?\nSo that huge numbers of people will generate incredible amounts of data for connecting suppliers and consumers via targeted ads.\nIf something is free, you are the commodity.", ">\n\nBut its not free, its just being paid for by their taxes that they hate paying. They are just too dense to think past their own butthole", ">\n\nAlso displays how non-competitive the markets are. If one guy raising the price causes the rest of the makers to match that price, there's no competition. In a competitive market, raising the price this much would be a death knell for a corporation. The other suppliers should maintain the government price and then take all of Pfizers sales.", ">\n\nThank you to big Pharma for feeding the anti-vaxxer crowd." ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people.", ">\n\nSmells like when the inventors of insulin gave away the patent for $1 out of concern for humanity only to have the drug companies rape diabetes patients with it ever since.", ">\n\nPeople keep saying how free vaccines are test beds for pharmaceuticals. So they’re just going to start charging for the same vaccines so people who’s too stupid to notice to think they’re releasing a finished product.\nWe have extremely twisted mental gymnastics towards things offered for free.", ">\n\nYou should ALWAYS consider why something is free.\nYou should NOT let conspiracy theories about why something is free override any common sense and drive your actions.\nVaccine is free, why is that?\nBecause both government and business recognize that a highly contagious disease among their workers and constituents is bad for business.\nWhy is Facebook free?\nSo that huge numbers of people will generate incredible amounts of data for connecting suppliers and consumers via targeted ads.\nIf something is free, you are the commodity.", ">\n\nBut its not free, its just being paid for by their taxes that they hate paying. They are just too dense to think past their own butthole", ">\n\nAlso displays how non-competitive the markets are. If one guy raising the price causes the rest of the makers to match that price, there's no competition. In a competitive market, raising the price this much would be a death knell for a corporation. The other suppliers should maintain the government price and then take all of Pfizers sales.", ">\n\nThank you to big Pharma for feeding the anti-vaxxer crowd.", ">\n\n\nThe federal government directly provided $1.7 billion to Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine research and development, and guaranteed the company billions more in sales.\n\nThe type of \"socialism\" the GOP has no problem with." ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people.", ">\n\nSmells like when the inventors of insulin gave away the patent for $1 out of concern for humanity only to have the drug companies rape diabetes patients with it ever since.", ">\n\nPeople keep saying how free vaccines are test beds for pharmaceuticals. So they’re just going to start charging for the same vaccines so people who’s too stupid to notice to think they’re releasing a finished product.\nWe have extremely twisted mental gymnastics towards things offered for free.", ">\n\nYou should ALWAYS consider why something is free.\nYou should NOT let conspiracy theories about why something is free override any common sense and drive your actions.\nVaccine is free, why is that?\nBecause both government and business recognize that a highly contagious disease among their workers and constituents is bad for business.\nWhy is Facebook free?\nSo that huge numbers of people will generate incredible amounts of data for connecting suppliers and consumers via targeted ads.\nIf something is free, you are the commodity.", ">\n\nBut its not free, its just being paid for by their taxes that they hate paying. They are just too dense to think past their own butthole", ">\n\nAlso displays how non-competitive the markets are. If one guy raising the price causes the rest of the makers to match that price, there's no competition. In a competitive market, raising the price this much would be a death knell for a corporation. The other suppliers should maintain the government price and then take all of Pfizers sales.", ">\n\nThank you to big Pharma for feeding the anti-vaxxer crowd.", ">\n\n\nThe federal government directly provided $1.7 billion to Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine research and development, and guaranteed the company billions more in sales.\n\nThe type of \"socialism\" the GOP has no problem with.", ">\n\nI mean, yes, I agree.\nBut also, with the exception of people that are just now old enough to get it, what the fuck were you doing this whole time? Refusing to get it?" ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people.", ">\n\nSmells like when the inventors of insulin gave away the patent for $1 out of concern for humanity only to have the drug companies rape diabetes patients with it ever since.", ">\n\nPeople keep saying how free vaccines are test beds for pharmaceuticals. So they’re just going to start charging for the same vaccines so people who’s too stupid to notice to think they’re releasing a finished product.\nWe have extremely twisted mental gymnastics towards things offered for free.", ">\n\nYou should ALWAYS consider why something is free.\nYou should NOT let conspiracy theories about why something is free override any common sense and drive your actions.\nVaccine is free, why is that?\nBecause both government and business recognize that a highly contagious disease among their workers and constituents is bad for business.\nWhy is Facebook free?\nSo that huge numbers of people will generate incredible amounts of data for connecting suppliers and consumers via targeted ads.\nIf something is free, you are the commodity.", ">\n\nBut its not free, its just being paid for by their taxes that they hate paying. They are just too dense to think past their own butthole", ">\n\nAlso displays how non-competitive the markets are. If one guy raising the price causes the rest of the makers to match that price, there's no competition. In a competitive market, raising the price this much would be a death knell for a corporation. The other suppliers should maintain the government price and then take all of Pfizers sales.", ">\n\nThank you to big Pharma for feeding the anti-vaxxer crowd.", ">\n\n\nThe federal government directly provided $1.7 billion to Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine research and development, and guaranteed the company billions more in sales.\n\nThe type of \"socialism\" the GOP has no problem with.", ">\n\nI mean, yes, I agree.\nBut also, with the exception of people that are just now old enough to get it, what the fuck were you doing this whole time? Refusing to get it?", ">\n\nWouldn't this affect the boosters we're supposed to get every 6 mos as well?" ]

[ "$19 Billion over two years. And they want to go from $3/dose to 130. \nI'm not saying this is the reason this country sucks. But it's certainly contributing.", ">\n\nSo, Moderna wants to say 'fuck you' and gouge people for more money?\nI would be fine with the country saying \"Fuck you\" right back. Nationalize the company and its assets, continue to provide for the people.", ">\n\nSmells like when the inventors of insulin gave away the patent for $1 out of concern for humanity only to have the drug companies rape diabetes patients with it ever since.", ">\n\nPeople keep saying how free vaccines are test beds for pharmaceuticals. So they’re just going to start charging for the same vaccines so people who’s too stupid to notice to think they’re releasing a finished product.\nWe have extremely twisted mental gymnastics towards things offered for free.", ">\n\nYou should ALWAYS consider why something is free.\nYou should NOT let conspiracy theories about why something is free override any common sense and drive your actions.\nVaccine is free, why is that?\nBecause both government and business recognize that a highly contagious disease among their workers and constituents is bad for business.\nWhy is Facebook free?\nSo that huge numbers of people will generate incredible amounts of data for connecting suppliers and consumers via targeted ads.\nIf something is free, you are the commodity.", ">\n\nBut its not free, its just being paid for by their taxes that they hate paying. They are just too dense to think past their own butthole", ">\n\nAlso displays how non-competitive the markets are. If one guy raising the price causes the rest of the makers to match that price, there's no competition. In a competitive market, raising the price this much would be a death knell for a corporation. The other suppliers should maintain the government price and then take all of Pfizers sales.", ">\n\nThank you to big Pharma for feeding the anti-vaxxer crowd.", ">\n\n\nThe federal government directly provided $1.7 billion to Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine research and development, and guaranteed the company billions more in sales.\n\nThe type of \"socialism\" the GOP has no problem with.", ">\n\nI mean, yes, I agree.\nBut also, with the exception of people that are just now old enough to get it, what the fuck were you doing this whole time? Refusing to get it?", ">\n\nWouldn't this affect the boosters we're supposed to get every 6 mos as well?", ">\n\nI would assume so, considering people are getting covid on the regular. \nAnd before anyone goes all stupid and brings up covid case numbers - any numbers before late 2020 and after the first omnicron wave subsided (2022) is bunk. \nWhy? like some morons I know, if you dont test for it, you dont have it." ]

[]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂" ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!" ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one" ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one", ">\n\nFinally a job I’m qualified for." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one", ">\n\nFinally a job I’m qualified for.", ">\n\nLol, volunteer to get \"public drunkenness\", \"resisting arrest\", and \"assault on an officer\" charges?\nNo thank you." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one", ">\n\nFinally a job I’m qualified for.", ">\n\nLol, volunteer to get \"public drunkenness\", \"resisting arrest\", and \"assault on an officer\" charges?\nNo thank you.", ">\n\nI never volunteered! They just showed up every time and forced me to." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one", ">\n\nFinally a job I’m qualified for.", ">\n\nLol, volunteer to get \"public drunkenness\", \"resisting arrest\", and \"assault on an officer\" charges?\nNo thank you.", ">\n\nI never volunteered! They just showed up every time and forced me to.", ">\n\nMy father did this once. They pick you up, drop you off, and provide your drinks of choice all for hanging out and doing sobriety tests intermittently for a few hours. Not really oniony just smart training." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one", ">\n\nFinally a job I’m qualified for.", ">\n\nLol, volunteer to get \"public drunkenness\", \"resisting arrest\", and \"assault on an officer\" charges?\nNo thank you.", ">\n\nI never volunteered! They just showed up every time and forced me to.", ">\n\nMy father did this once. They pick you up, drop you off, and provide your drinks of choice all for hanging out and doing sobriety tests intermittently for a few hours. Not really oniony just smart training.", ">\n\nThat is genius, and this is a first for me: I wish I lived in Missouri." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one", ">\n\nFinally a job I’m qualified for.", ">\n\nLol, volunteer to get \"public drunkenness\", \"resisting arrest\", and \"assault on an officer\" charges?\nNo thank you.", ">\n\nI never volunteered! They just showed up every time and forced me to.", ">\n\nMy father did this once. They pick you up, drop you off, and provide your drinks of choice all for hanging out and doing sobriety tests intermittently for a few hours. Not really oniony just smart training.", ">\n\nThat is genius, and this is a first for me: I wish I lived in Missouri.", ">\n\nAs a Missourian, i can confidently say, nah, you don't wish that." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one", ">\n\nFinally a job I’m qualified for.", ">\n\nLol, volunteer to get \"public drunkenness\", \"resisting arrest\", and \"assault on an officer\" charges?\nNo thank you.", ">\n\nI never volunteered! They just showed up every time and forced me to.", ">\n\nMy father did this once. They pick you up, drop you off, and provide your drinks of choice all for hanging out and doing sobriety tests intermittently for a few hours. Not really oniony just smart training.", ">\n\nThat is genius, and this is a first for me: I wish I lived in Missouri.", ">\n\nAs a Missourian, i can confidently say, nah, you don't wish that.", ">\n\nThey do this all over. Often times it is friends of those on the force. Or they get people from a fire department, ER, etc." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one", ">\n\nFinally a job I’m qualified for.", ">\n\nLol, volunteer to get \"public drunkenness\", \"resisting arrest\", and \"assault on an officer\" charges?\nNo thank you.", ">\n\nI never volunteered! They just showed up every time and forced me to.", ">\n\nMy father did this once. They pick you up, drop you off, and provide your drinks of choice all for hanging out and doing sobriety tests intermittently for a few hours. Not really oniony just smart training.", ">\n\nThat is genius, and this is a first for me: I wish I lived in Missouri.", ">\n\nAs a Missourian, i can confidently say, nah, you don't wish that.", ">\n\nThey do this all over. Often times it is friends of those on the force. Or they get people from a fire department, ER, etc.", ">\n\nLike this?" ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one", ">\n\nFinally a job I’m qualified for.", ">\n\nLol, volunteer to get \"public drunkenness\", \"resisting arrest\", and \"assault on an officer\" charges?\nNo thank you.", ">\n\nI never volunteered! They just showed up every time and forced me to.", ">\n\nMy father did this once. They pick you up, drop you off, and provide your drinks of choice all for hanging out and doing sobriety tests intermittently for a few hours. Not really oniony just smart training.", ">\n\nThat is genius, and this is a first for me: I wish I lived in Missouri.", ">\n\nAs a Missourian, i can confidently say, nah, you don't wish that.", ">\n\nThey do this all over. Often times it is friends of those on the force. Or they get people from a fire department, ER, etc.", ">\n\nLike this?", ">\n\nThis was already posted 8 hrs before you." ]

[ "Reminds me of when Mythbusters tried to beat the breath test, so Adam and Jamie got to drink with the officers at the station. \"Adam, the police officer says you need to drink more.\" 😂", ">\n\nNever do field sobriety tests. In most states they’re optional and they’re only designed to build a case against you even if you’re stone sober. \nRefuse the test. Make them arrest you, and then at the station you’ll have to do a breathalyzer. \nObviously don’t drink and drive, but if you ever get pulled over driving late at night and they start with this shit, refuse.", ">\n\nGood luck with that in GA.", ">\n\nI'd rather take the breathalyzer than be forced into a hospital and held down for blood to be taken. Rural GA does not care about your rights, nor do they care about having to give a cop a paid vacation during a lawsuit.", ">\n\nDr Fever is on his way!", ">\n\nThis was an even better episode than the Thanksgiving one", ">\n\nFinally a job I’m qualified for.", ">\n\nLol, volunteer to get \"public drunkenness\", \"resisting arrest\", and \"assault on an officer\" charges?\nNo thank you.", ">\n\nI never volunteered! They just showed up every time and forced me to.", ">\n\nMy father did this once. They pick you up, drop you off, and provide your drinks of choice all for hanging out and doing sobriety tests intermittently for a few hours. Not really oniony just smart training.", ">\n\nThat is genius, and this is a first for me: I wish I lived in Missouri.", ">\n\nAs a Missourian, i can confidently say, nah, you don't wish that.", ">\n\nThey do this all over. Often times it is friends of those on the force. Or they get people from a fire department, ER, etc.", ">\n\nLike this?", ">\n\nThis was already posted 8 hrs before you.", ">\n\nDamn, is the url search not working anymore? Might have been some tracking shit in the URL for this or the other post." ]

[]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)" ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕" ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats" ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?" ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…" ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…", ">\n\nThe Mexican drug cartels come to mind" ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…", ">\n\nThe Mexican drug cartels come to mind", ">\n\nShowing the ruling class what they will do if they are bought the Senate as well." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…", ">\n\nThe Mexican drug cartels come to mind", ">\n\nShowing the ruling class what they will do if they are bought the Senate as well.", ">\n\nWhich will still need the approval of the Senate and Joe Biden." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…", ">\n\nThe Mexican drug cartels come to mind", ">\n\nShowing the ruling class what they will do if they are bought the Senate as well.", ">\n\nWhich will still need the approval of the Senate and Joe Biden.", ">\n\nThe GOP can ram in those amendments into must-pass bills." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…", ">\n\nThe Mexican drug cartels come to mind", ">\n\nShowing the ruling class what they will do if they are bought the Senate as well.", ">\n\nWhich will still need the approval of the Senate and Joe Biden.", ">\n\nThe GOP can ram in those amendments into must-pass bills.", ">\n\nThere is only one must pass bill which wont start until October, the debit ceiling bill. its not going in there since they also want to chop SS and Medicaid. Which Dems wont like so the GOP will shutdown the government for 3 months then it will become a game of chicken to see if the GOP wants us to default on our debt." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…", ">\n\nThe Mexican drug cartels come to mind", ">\n\nShowing the ruling class what they will do if they are bought the Senate as well.", ">\n\nWhich will still need the approval of the Senate and Joe Biden.", ">\n\nThe GOP can ram in those amendments into must-pass bills.", ">\n\nThere is only one must pass bill which wont start until October, the debit ceiling bill. its not going in there since they also want to chop SS and Medicaid. Which Dems wont like so the GOP will shutdown the government for 3 months then it will become a game of chicken to see if the GOP wants us to default on our debt.", ">\n\nThe republicans house will propose and pass a variety of bills, even on subjects that they don't actually want to happen or believe in, safe in the knowledge that they'll be voted down in the senate, or, if some miracle happens, vetoed by Biden. \nThey can signal virtue to their base, all the while actually accomplishing nothing at all, which appears to be their primary goal - nothing. Deadlock all government functions and programs, because any success at this point would reflect well on biden, and we cannot have that." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…", ">\n\nThe Mexican drug cartels come to mind", ">\n\nShowing the ruling class what they will do if they are bought the Senate as well.", ">\n\nWhich will still need the approval of the Senate and Joe Biden.", ">\n\nThe GOP can ram in those amendments into must-pass bills.", ">\n\nThere is only one must pass bill which wont start until October, the debit ceiling bill. its not going in there since they also want to chop SS and Medicaid. Which Dems wont like so the GOP will shutdown the government for 3 months then it will become a game of chicken to see if the GOP wants us to default on our debt.", ">\n\nThe republicans house will propose and pass a variety of bills, even on subjects that they don't actually want to happen or believe in, safe in the knowledge that they'll be voted down in the senate, or, if some miracle happens, vetoed by Biden. \nThey can signal virtue to their base, all the while actually accomplishing nothing at all, which appears to be their primary goal - nothing. Deadlock all government functions and programs, because any success at this point would reflect well on biden, and we cannot have that.", ">\n\nNow that it stands no chance of being signed, they'll probably start repealing Obamacare every other week." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…", ">\n\nThe Mexican drug cartels come to mind", ">\n\nShowing the ruling class what they will do if they are bought the Senate as well.", ">\n\nWhich will still need the approval of the Senate and Joe Biden.", ">\n\nThe GOP can ram in those amendments into must-pass bills.", ">\n\nThere is only one must pass bill which wont start until October, the debit ceiling bill. its not going in there since they also want to chop SS and Medicaid. Which Dems wont like so the GOP will shutdown the government for 3 months then it will become a game of chicken to see if the GOP wants us to default on our debt.", ">\n\nThe republicans house will propose and pass a variety of bills, even on subjects that they don't actually want to happen or believe in, safe in the knowledge that they'll be voted down in the senate, or, if some miracle happens, vetoed by Biden. \nThey can signal virtue to their base, all the while actually accomplishing nothing at all, which appears to be their primary goal - nothing. Deadlock all government functions and programs, because any success at this point would reflect well on biden, and we cannot have that.", ">\n\nNow that it stands no chance of being signed, they'll probably start repealing Obamacare every other week.", ">\n\nAll for mandating crack squads going after shells and people showing up in the Panama papers, but instead we get $600 transactions being reported to the IRS. Step the F up." ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…", ">\n\nThe Mexican drug cartels come to mind", ">\n\nShowing the ruling class what they will do if they are bought the Senate as well.", ">\n\nWhich will still need the approval of the Senate and Joe Biden.", ">\n\nThe GOP can ram in those amendments into must-pass bills.", ">\n\nThere is only one must pass bill which wont start until October, the debit ceiling bill. its not going in there since they also want to chop SS and Medicaid. Which Dems wont like so the GOP will shutdown the government for 3 months then it will become a game of chicken to see if the GOP wants us to default on our debt.", ">\n\nThe republicans house will propose and pass a variety of bills, even on subjects that they don't actually want to happen or believe in, safe in the knowledge that they'll be voted down in the senate, or, if some miracle happens, vetoed by Biden. \nThey can signal virtue to their base, all the while actually accomplishing nothing at all, which appears to be their primary goal - nothing. Deadlock all government functions and programs, because any success at this point would reflect well on biden, and we cannot have that.", ">\n\nNow that it stands no chance of being signed, they'll probably start repealing Obamacare every other week.", ">\n\nAll for mandating crack squads going after shells and people showing up in the Panama papers, but instead we get $600 transactions being reported to the IRS. Step the F up.", ">\n\nF the IRS - cut their funding to zero. If there needs to be any agency wiped clean and started over it’s a tough choice to not pick the IRS" ]

[ "As a sole prop I always question people who are so concerned with the new IRS agents. I know it's a hassle to be audited and even I am worried about mistakes but the IRS isn't worried about mistakes they are worried about tax fraud. If you are a legit business you should probably conduct yourself as such. Hiring an accountant is not hard or even that expensive.", ">\n\n\n“The last thing they need is more IRS agents knocking on doors to conduct audits,” Smith alleged.\n\nAnd there it is. That's all they care about. Screw helping the country. Screw saving their constituents pain. It's all about wanting to cheat the system without consequence.", ">\n\nThey're trying to spin this as \"these IRS agents are just going to audit the middle class/poor and that's why we need to cut them.\" In reality, most of these new hires are support staff designed to replace retiring staff members. The rest are an attempt to bolster the IRS staff so they can go after wealthy tax cheats.\nInstead, the Republicans would rather starve the IRS of funds and staffing so that the wealthy can't be audited. As a bonus, fewer taxes collected means they can (attempt to) better justify huge cuts social programs. \"Can't afford these programs to help poor people because we don't have the funding because the rich people can cheat on their taxes because we cut funding for the IRS.\" (Nevermind that the social programs actually make up a tiny portion of the budget.)", ">\n\nWhat's the point? It's dead on arrival in the Senate. All this does is send the message they want to cheat on their taxes without obstruction. Idiots. 😕", ">\n\nThat's going to be the point of everything they try to pass. Blatant pandering to their base while also letting those who are actually aware know they don't give a fuck.", ">\n\nBut in order to win they need to get independent votes too, and it's hard to imagine independents are going to go for the type of shit that's going to come from the 118th House.", ">\n\nIrrelevant. The clowns in Congress will be sideshowed to the three-ring circus that will be front and center of the Republican Presidential primary and the election. \nSo called Independent voters will be too distracted by whatever the right-wing media will be clambering about 12+ months from now.", ">\n\nI dunno... they weren't distracted in the '22 midterms.", ">\n\n*hobbling pursuit of tax cheats", ">\n\nThey caught Al Capone for income tax evasion \nJust who are the Republicans trying to protect?", ">\n\nThemselves and their donors. It’s not like the average citizen has off shore bank accounts they don’t mention to the IRS.", ">\n\nSo the GOP is upset that the deficit is $32 trillion, yet doesn’t want addition agents to bring in more revenue because it will target their mega-donors. \nPeople will still vote these idiots in cause they are like televangelists, by promising miracles, while they get rich.", ">\n\nProtect the dirty money first and foremost is the gqp grifter creed.", ">\n\nI wonder if they had anyone in mind when they did this…", ">\n\nThe Mexican drug cartels come to mind", ">\n\nShowing the ruling class what they will do if they are bought the Senate as well.", ">\n\nWhich will still need the approval of the Senate and Joe Biden.", ">\n\nThe GOP can ram in those amendments into must-pass bills.", ">\n\nThere is only one must pass bill which wont start until October, the debit ceiling bill. its not going in there since they also want to chop SS and Medicaid. Which Dems wont like so the GOP will shutdown the government for 3 months then it will become a game of chicken to see if the GOP wants us to default on our debt.", ">\n\nThe republicans house will propose and pass a variety of bills, even on subjects that they don't actually want to happen or believe in, safe in the knowledge that they'll be voted down in the senate, or, if some miracle happens, vetoed by Biden. \nThey can signal virtue to their base, all the while actually accomplishing nothing at all, which appears to be their primary goal - nothing. Deadlock all government functions and programs, because any success at this point would reflect well on biden, and we cannot have that.", ">\n\nNow that it stands no chance of being signed, they'll probably start repealing Obamacare every other week.", ">\n\nAll for mandating crack squads going after shells and people showing up in the Panama papers, but instead we get $600 transactions being reported to the IRS. Step the F up.", ">\n\nF the IRS - cut their funding to zero. If there needs to be any agency wiped clean and started over it’s a tough choice to not pick the IRS", ">\n\nI think this is part of the GOP tactic. They know, as evidenced by this subreddit, that liberals will defend to the death anything that a conservatives opposes. So they’re tricking liberals into defending one of the most evil and useless alphabet agencies." ]

[]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…" ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭" ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!" ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook.", ">\n\nI live in the UK, my gas and electric have doubled even though only 4% of external UK imports come from Russia and at the same time energy/oil companies like Shell are reporting a profit of $9.5bn for q3. This is crisis profiteering at it's lowest level and I am fed up of the media blaming it purely on the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Unfortunately, a dangerously large amount of the population gobble this crap up while greedy CEOs line their pockets." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook.", ">\n\nI live in the UK, my gas and electric have doubled even though only 4% of external UK imports come from Russia and at the same time energy/oil companies like Shell are reporting a profit of $9.5bn for q3. This is crisis profiteering at it's lowest level and I am fed up of the media blaming it purely on the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Unfortunately, a dangerously large amount of the population gobble this crap up while greedy CEOs line their pockets.", ">\n\nAlthough we only rely on 4% of Russian energy, what pushed the price up is other countries then buying up the energy from other suppliers and entering into a bidding war. That’s what pushed the prices up. \nAs for the profiteering, you can thank Rishi for not doing more with windfall taxes or truss making us pay our own subsidy on our bills." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook.", ">\n\nI live in the UK, my gas and electric have doubled even though only 4% of external UK imports come from Russia and at the same time energy/oil companies like Shell are reporting a profit of $9.5bn for q3. This is crisis profiteering at it's lowest level and I am fed up of the media blaming it purely on the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Unfortunately, a dangerously large amount of the population gobble this crap up while greedy CEOs line their pockets.", ">\n\nAlthough we only rely on 4% of Russian energy, what pushed the price up is other countries then buying up the energy from other suppliers and entering into a bidding war. That’s what pushed the prices up. \nAs for the profiteering, you can thank Rishi for not doing more with windfall taxes or truss making us pay our own subsidy on our bills.", ">\n\nbut...... Russia turned off the taps! Petroleum is low! how is this even possible? I mean Exxon shell and other executive had to increase prices because there was no fuel! \nLoL" ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook.", ">\n\nI live in the UK, my gas and electric have doubled even though only 4% of external UK imports come from Russia and at the same time energy/oil companies like Shell are reporting a profit of $9.5bn for q3. This is crisis profiteering at it's lowest level and I am fed up of the media blaming it purely on the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Unfortunately, a dangerously large amount of the population gobble this crap up while greedy CEOs line their pockets.", ">\n\nAlthough we only rely on 4% of Russian energy, what pushed the price up is other countries then buying up the energy from other suppliers and entering into a bidding war. That’s what pushed the prices up. \nAs for the profiteering, you can thank Rishi for not doing more with windfall taxes or truss making us pay our own subsidy on our bills.", ">\n\nbut...... Russia turned off the taps! Petroleum is low! how is this even possible? I mean Exxon shell and other executive had to increase prices because there was no fuel! \nLoL", ">\n\nSupply chains, how do they work?!?!?" ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook.", ">\n\nI live in the UK, my gas and electric have doubled even though only 4% of external UK imports come from Russia and at the same time energy/oil companies like Shell are reporting a profit of $9.5bn for q3. This is crisis profiteering at it's lowest level and I am fed up of the media blaming it purely on the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Unfortunately, a dangerously large amount of the population gobble this crap up while greedy CEOs line their pockets.", ">\n\nAlthough we only rely on 4% of Russian energy, what pushed the price up is other countries then buying up the energy from other suppliers and entering into a bidding war. That’s what pushed the prices up. \nAs for the profiteering, you can thank Rishi for not doing more with windfall taxes or truss making us pay our own subsidy on our bills.", ">\n\nbut...... Russia turned off the taps! Petroleum is low! how is this even possible? I mean Exxon shell and other executive had to increase prices because there was no fuel! \nLoL", ">\n\nSupply chains, how do they work?!?!?", ">\n\nAnd we're still making 3x+ the margin we did before the war. \nIt used to be 5p/l, it's more like 20p/l at the moment." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook.", ">\n\nI live in the UK, my gas and electric have doubled even though only 4% of external UK imports come from Russia and at the same time energy/oil companies like Shell are reporting a profit of $9.5bn for q3. This is crisis profiteering at it's lowest level and I am fed up of the media blaming it purely on the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Unfortunately, a dangerously large amount of the population gobble this crap up while greedy CEOs line their pockets.", ">\n\nAlthough we only rely on 4% of Russian energy, what pushed the price up is other countries then buying up the energy from other suppliers and entering into a bidding war. That’s what pushed the prices up. \nAs for the profiteering, you can thank Rishi for not doing more with windfall taxes or truss making us pay our own subsidy on our bills.", ">\n\nbut...... Russia turned off the taps! Petroleum is low! how is this even possible? I mean Exxon shell and other executive had to increase prices because there was no fuel! \nLoL", ">\n\nSupply chains, how do they work?!?!?", ">\n\nAnd we're still making 3x+ the margin we did before the war. \nIt used to be 5p/l, it's more like 20p/l at the moment.", ">\n\nI do work for the companies that provide gas for two large chains of gas stations from Long Island up to White Plains. You're right about them making way more profit margins. Worst part is that it has become a racket. If my clients lowered their profit margin to lower the prices then everyone else would have to do the same. It's been mentioned a few times that they're actually a bit afraid to be the first ones to try to lower it because there's so much money involved something bad may happen to them.\nI can't feel bad for them though. Greed got them here and I'm sure they'll cash out just fine." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook.", ">\n\nI live in the UK, my gas and electric have doubled even though only 4% of external UK imports come from Russia and at the same time energy/oil companies like Shell are reporting a profit of $9.5bn for q3. This is crisis profiteering at it's lowest level and I am fed up of the media blaming it purely on the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Unfortunately, a dangerously large amount of the population gobble this crap up while greedy CEOs line their pockets.", ">\n\nAlthough we only rely on 4% of Russian energy, what pushed the price up is other countries then buying up the energy from other suppliers and entering into a bidding war. That’s what pushed the prices up. \nAs for the profiteering, you can thank Rishi for not doing more with windfall taxes or truss making us pay our own subsidy on our bills.", ">\n\nbut...... Russia turned off the taps! Petroleum is low! how is this even possible? I mean Exxon shell and other executive had to increase prices because there was no fuel! \nLoL", ">\n\nSupply chains, how do they work?!?!?", ">\n\nAnd we're still making 3x+ the margin we did before the war. \nIt used to be 5p/l, it's more like 20p/l at the moment.", ">\n\nI do work for the companies that provide gas for two large chains of gas stations from Long Island up to White Plains. You're right about them making way more profit margins. Worst part is that it has become a racket. If my clients lowered their profit margin to lower the prices then everyone else would have to do the same. It's been mentioned a few times that they're actually a bit afraid to be the first ones to try to lower it because there's so much money involved something bad may happen to them.\nI can't feel bad for them though. Greed got them here and I'm sure they'll cash out just fine.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 56%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nAverage petrol prices have fallen below £1.50p for the first time since Russia invaded Ukraine last February, the AA motoring group says.\nPump prices hit a record of 191.53p a litre in early July, but by Monday had dropped down to 149.74p. The AA said it was \"a huge relief for drivers\" but noted that diesel prices were still higher than they were last year at 172.21p a litre.\nFuel prices began to rise as countries unlocked from the Covid pandemic but surged higher when Russia - a major oil producer - invaded Ukraine because of concerns about global supplies.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: prices^#1 rise^#2 petrol^#3 litre^#4 fuel^#5" ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook.", ">\n\nI live in the UK, my gas and electric have doubled even though only 4% of external UK imports come from Russia and at the same time energy/oil companies like Shell are reporting a profit of $9.5bn for q3. This is crisis profiteering at it's lowest level and I am fed up of the media blaming it purely on the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Unfortunately, a dangerously large amount of the population gobble this crap up while greedy CEOs line their pockets.", ">\n\nAlthough we only rely on 4% of Russian energy, what pushed the price up is other countries then buying up the energy from other suppliers and entering into a bidding war. That’s what pushed the prices up. \nAs for the profiteering, you can thank Rishi for not doing more with windfall taxes or truss making us pay our own subsidy on our bills.", ">\n\nbut...... Russia turned off the taps! Petroleum is low! how is this even possible? I mean Exxon shell and other executive had to increase prices because there was no fuel! \nLoL", ">\n\nSupply chains, how do they work?!?!?", ">\n\nAnd we're still making 3x+ the margin we did before the war. \nIt used to be 5p/l, it's more like 20p/l at the moment.", ">\n\nI do work for the companies that provide gas for two large chains of gas stations from Long Island up to White Plains. You're right about them making way more profit margins. Worst part is that it has become a racket. If my clients lowered their profit margin to lower the prices then everyone else would have to do the same. It's been mentioned a few times that they're actually a bit afraid to be the first ones to try to lower it because there's so much money involved something bad may happen to them.\nI can't feel bad for them though. Greed got them here and I'm sure they'll cash out just fine.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 56%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nAverage petrol prices have fallen below £1.50p for the first time since Russia invaded Ukraine last February, the AA motoring group says.\nPump prices hit a record of 191.53p a litre in early July, but by Monday had dropped down to 149.74p. The AA said it was \"a huge relief for drivers\" but noted that diesel prices were still higher than they were last year at 172.21p a litre.\nFuel prices began to rise as countries unlocked from the Covid pandemic but surged higher when Russia - a major oil producer - invaded Ukraine because of concerns about global supplies.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: prices^#1 rise^#2 petrol^#3 litre^#4 fuel^#5", ">\n\nPeople can't feed on petrol." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook.", ">\n\nI live in the UK, my gas and electric have doubled even though only 4% of external UK imports come from Russia and at the same time energy/oil companies like Shell are reporting a profit of $9.5bn for q3. This is crisis profiteering at it's lowest level and I am fed up of the media blaming it purely on the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Unfortunately, a dangerously large amount of the population gobble this crap up while greedy CEOs line their pockets.", ">\n\nAlthough we only rely on 4% of Russian energy, what pushed the price up is other countries then buying up the energy from other suppliers and entering into a bidding war. That’s what pushed the prices up. \nAs for the profiteering, you can thank Rishi for not doing more with windfall taxes or truss making us pay our own subsidy on our bills.", ">\n\nbut...... Russia turned off the taps! Petroleum is low! how is this even possible? I mean Exxon shell and other executive had to increase prices because there was no fuel! \nLoL", ">\n\nSupply chains, how do they work?!?!?", ">\n\nAnd we're still making 3x+ the margin we did before the war. \nIt used to be 5p/l, it's more like 20p/l at the moment.", ">\n\nI do work for the companies that provide gas for two large chains of gas stations from Long Island up to White Plains. You're right about them making way more profit margins. Worst part is that it has become a racket. If my clients lowered their profit margin to lower the prices then everyone else would have to do the same. It's been mentioned a few times that they're actually a bit afraid to be the first ones to try to lower it because there's so much money involved something bad may happen to them.\nI can't feel bad for them though. Greed got them here and I'm sure they'll cash out just fine.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 56%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nAverage petrol prices have fallen below £1.50p for the first time since Russia invaded Ukraine last February, the AA motoring group says.\nPump prices hit a record of 191.53p a litre in early July, but by Monday had dropped down to 149.74p. The AA said it was \"a huge relief for drivers\" but noted that diesel prices were still higher than they were last year at 172.21p a litre.\nFuel prices began to rise as countries unlocked from the Covid pandemic but surged higher when Russia - a major oil producer - invaded Ukraine because of concerns about global supplies.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: prices^#1 rise^#2 petrol^#3 litre^#4 fuel^#5", ">\n\nPeople can't feed on petrol.", ">\n\nThe trucks that deliver food run on it. The machinery that harvests food runs on it. Just because it's not food doesn't mean that it doesn't have a massive impact on the price you pay for food." ]

[ "And people complain about the price of gas here in Canada where its currently around $1.30 CAD per litre = £0.80 per litre = $3.66 USD per gallon.", ">\n\nHuh. IIRC petrol in the UK was about 80p/litre when I started driving 20 years ago…", ">\n\nAnd 20 years ago in Canada it was about 70 cents CAD per liter. At the time it was £2.38 to the Canadian dollar, so that would have been the equivalent of £0.29 per liter.", ">\n\n😭", ">\n\nTake back control!", ">\n\nThis is about $6.89/U.S. Gallon, in case you were wondering.\nDriving is always expensive here.", ">\n\nIt had nothing to do with Russia invading Ukraine in the first place but petrol companies and the energy sector couldn't let a good crisis go to waste.", ">\n\nWTI oil futures were skyrocketing immediately after the invasion.", ">\n\nA comment claiming that the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent Western sanctions on Russia had no impact on the price of oil. And that comment got upvoted...\nThe misinformation on here isn't much better than Facebook.", ">\n\nI live in the UK, my gas and electric have doubled even though only 4% of external UK imports come from Russia and at the same time energy/oil companies like Shell are reporting a profit of $9.5bn for q3. This is crisis profiteering at it's lowest level and I am fed up of the media blaming it purely on the Russia/Ukraine conflict. Unfortunately, a dangerously large amount of the population gobble this crap up while greedy CEOs line their pockets.", ">\n\nAlthough we only rely on 4% of Russian energy, what pushed the price up is other countries then buying up the energy from other suppliers and entering into a bidding war. That’s what pushed the prices up. \nAs for the profiteering, you can thank Rishi for not doing more with windfall taxes or truss making us pay our own subsidy on our bills.", ">\n\nbut...... Russia turned off the taps! Petroleum is low! how is this even possible? I mean Exxon shell and other executive had to increase prices because there was no fuel! \nLoL", ">\n\nSupply chains, how do they work?!?!?", ">\n\nAnd we're still making 3x+ the margin we did before the war. \nIt used to be 5p/l, it's more like 20p/l at the moment.", ">\n\nI do work for the companies that provide gas for two large chains of gas stations from Long Island up to White Plains. You're right about them making way more profit margins. Worst part is that it has become a racket. If my clients lowered their profit margin to lower the prices then everyone else would have to do the same. It's been mentioned a few times that they're actually a bit afraid to be the first ones to try to lower it because there's so much money involved something bad may happen to them.\nI can't feel bad for them though. Greed got them here and I'm sure they'll cash out just fine.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 56%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nAverage petrol prices have fallen below £1.50p for the first time since Russia invaded Ukraine last February, the AA motoring group says.\nPump prices hit a record of 191.53p a litre in early July, but by Monday had dropped down to 149.74p. The AA said it was \"a huge relief for drivers\" but noted that diesel prices were still higher than they were last year at 172.21p a litre.\nFuel prices began to rise as countries unlocked from the Covid pandemic but surged higher when Russia - a major oil producer - invaded Ukraine because of concerns about global supplies.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: prices^#1 rise^#2 petrol^#3 litre^#4 fuel^#5", ">\n\nPeople can't feed on petrol.", ">\n\nThe trucks that deliver food run on it. The machinery that harvests food runs on it. Just because it's not food doesn't mean that it doesn't have a massive impact on the price you pay for food.", ">\n\nIt has been for weeks? Atleast in NI anyways" ]

[]

[ "crows have weirder voices" ]

[ "crows have weirder voices", ">\n\nLol. \nI love birds and parrots I would enjoy owning one. Except they live forever and some are just fucking noisy! \nAnd who knows, the thing they enjoy saying maybe “hello”. It could also end up being “let’s fuck, baby” and say that 200 times a day lol" ]