Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset3

like 0

[ "Another thought: he just wants to ensure video evidence of his next assault", ">\n\nWhy would he bring his next \"date\" to Congress? Or is he planning to just grab one from the next field trip?", ">\n\nMaybe the only thing I agree with this guy on", ">\n\nI also agree with him that McCarthy shouldn't be Speaker.", ">\n\nWell a broken clock is right twice a day.", ">\n\nA bad check always bounces.", ">\n\nDoesn't bounce when you're using venmo, chkchk ;)", ">\n\nNo, Venmo just takes a random 2% and doesn't tell the payer because they want them to keep accidently hitting the \"charge the recipient 2%\" button every time", ">\n\nYou're admitting more than you want to", ">\n\nRight, my friend needs 'buyer protection' because we go halfsies on a couple movie tickets, in case I don't hand him his ticket.", ">\n\nLmao I actually hopes it passes. Made C-SPAN must watch TV.", ">\n\nCan you imagine an America where we elect representatives based on their daytime reality tv entertainment value?", ">\n\nYes, what a far flung fantasy that would be...", ">\n\nI fully support this, C-span was having the time of their life and I was there for it lol I strongly believe this is an effective way to get more voters interested and involved", ">\n\nA two drink minimum for full sessions would get people way more interested. It took 14 votes over three days to nearly get someone to punch someone else while (allegedly) sober, we need to pump those numbers up. Think of the ratings!", ">\n\nSo parliament then", ">\n\nProbably because he wants to pull some shit and use the footage out of context in Fox to fit in with the right’s victim complex.", ">\n\nA broken clock is right twice a day.", ">\n\nI agree with Matt gaetz.... Which instantly makes me suspicious", ">\n\nIt's a double-edged sword.\nA lot of grandstanding attention whores would rant in front of empty chambers for Fox News soundbites.", ">\n\nThat's why he wants this, to turn the center of legislation into a stage.", ">\n\nNewt Gingrich used C-Span to ruin the American psyche. They were stationary cameras pointed at the speaker. So he would stand in front of an entirely empty chamber and scream about how corrupt the Democrats were and how they should all be ashamed of themselves. He did that for almost 20 years, making up scandals - which he was also supremely guilty of himself - and then he became Speaker.\nSomething tells me Gaetz wants something similar.\nAlso, don’t upvote Fox News.", ">\n\nJust because it can be used for evil doesn't mean it's inherently bad. C-SPAN provides important visibility into what's happening on the House floor.", ">\n\nOh I’m not saying it’s inherently bad. But Matt Gaetz is, so I don’t trust his motivations.", ">\n\nHe loves to be filmed", ">\n\nHe thinks more cameras in the house means less cameras around the preschools that he trolls for dates.", ">\n\nI guess the ice cream truck wasn't hitting the quotas for him?", ">\n\nI hate agreeing with him, but I suspect that he has ulterior motives for this manuever.", ">\n\nHe wants their inevitable grandstanding to be televised/recorded.", ">\n\nThis is the way.", ">\n\nI dislike agreeing with Gaetz but I've done it twice recently. Kevin shouldn't be speaker and yes those should return.", ">\n\nAll my homies love Matt Gaetz.\nJust kidding. Fuck that guy (even though he's right this time).", ">\n\nI'll allow this clock to make the correct chimes this time.", ">\n\nAnother representative had to be held back from attacking Gaetz, so that’s probably why he wants more cameras. Either way, I agree that C-SPAN should have cameras in there so citizens can actually see and hear what’s happening", ">\n\nI hate having to agree with him...", ">\n\nEven a fascist douchebag is right twice a day.\nIs that how the saying goes?", ">\n\nYou got it.", ">\n\n\"Mr. DeMille, I'm ready for my closeup\"", ">\n\nGaetz wants C-Span back on the House floor.\nWell, I can't blame him.\nAfter all, who else is going to protect him from Repub Rep. Mike Rodgers, huh.\nRight Repubs?", ">\n\nOf course they do. They know they are going to be grandstanding a lot in the next two years, and want footage to use in their 2024 campaign ads.", ">\n\nLol. This is him setting trolling to maximum. He wants his underage loving face on tv more.\nNo ones going to forget your venmo you little creep.\nAll that said....lol. no way he succeeds. The gop doesnt want sunlight. Not really.", ">\n\nNeither do democrats. No speaker of either party ever allows cameras to have that sort of free access.", ">\n\nExcept for Gingrich.", ">\n\nI don’t remember them point cameras in every direction then, though.", ">\n\nFUCK FOX NEWS\nClickbait headlines don't mean they've stopped trying to destroy democracy. \nDon't upvote murdoch propagandists. They still fully support fascist politicians and basically exist to convince you to vote your rights away.", ">\n\nJust come for the comments and don’t click the link like the rest of us.", ">\n\nI see no reason to disagree with this proposal", ">\n\nI guarantee banning CSPAN was in the list of demands he held out for to get that in the House rules so he could submit this and get some easy positive press.", ">\n\nI 100% agree, and also that makes those 5 days that much funnier lol “I’m going to keep humiliating you on national tv until you agree to let me keep doing it for the next two years”", ">\n\nI hate agreeing with him. He is right on this.", ">\n\nThe idea that caneras would be detrimental to colleguality is belied by the total absence of collegiality.", ">\n\nWhat's the catch here? No way he does a somewhat sane thing for the hell of it", ">\n\nGrand standing. It's gonna become a trashy reality tv show.", ">\n\nI think he meant Barbie’s dream house", ">\n\nThe enemy of our enemy is our friend. In this case, a pedophile.", ">\n\nHe wants to turn actual congress into the WWE. \nI'm sure CSPAN would love the ratings but we need Capitol Hill, not Circus Maximus", ">\n\nGive Gaetz enough rope and he will hang himself (politically that is). He can't ignore any camera. He has to play to it. So, put those camera's out there and watch the child begin.", ">\n\nHow else can the three-ring circus be effectively without an audience?", ">\n\nGaetz specifically noted that there should be no more than 15 cameras, as he loses interest in things over 15.", ">\n\nOmg...I can't believe I agree with Matt Gaetz....", ">\n\nShouldn’t all media have access to these proceedings? I don’t understand why C-span wasn’t allowed.", ">\n\nYou know what? Yeah I’m for this", ">\n\nDoes little butthead baby want his attention? Fuckin' prick.", ">\n\nGaetz for class prez", ">\n\nThink you had a typo, Gaetz for prision?", ">\n\n\"class\" was the key word in that joke.\nbut on this one and only idea I think its great", ">\n\nAh shit, I can't read!!", ">\n\nI can’t speak to his motives, but I think it’s a good idea.", ">\n\nVery important things happening in the house.", ">\n\nOnly sensible thing I've heard of come out of that jackass's mouth", ">\n\nGaetz is checking his hair, his blue suits and which profile is his best. Lights! Action! Cameras! Roll em!", ">\n\nHe’s gotta check his teeth too. It’s like chad the rest of the family didn’t want so he became Bad Chad. \nNobody wants to touch him with a 10 foot pole.", ">\n\nOh he's not retiring now? Shocker.", ">\n\nHe said he’d retire if dems voted for mccarthy", ">\n\nYes, continue to embarrass yourselves.", ">\n\nThese fake celebrities do not need more camera time for their grandstanding and other bs", ">\n\nIt would be the number one show on the if this happens. Pass the popcorn!", ">\n\nWait, C-SPAN isn't filming live anymore? What happened? That's literally everything about C-SPAN.", ">\n\nI found out yesterday as well after digging around since I also was wondering the same thing. Apparently C-SPAN was barred from bringing their cameras in to record (not sure the date they enforced this) so instead they have been using the official house chamber camera feed. The reason they were allowed to film the Speaker votes last week was because the 118th congress has not approved a rules package at that point. After the rules package was enacted, C-SPAN was again barred from filming in the chamber. This bill would allow C-SPAN to bring their own cameras to film.", ">\n\nMakes sense, it made him look great during the circus.", ">\n\nC-Span is incredible but I’ve got to wonder wtf this guy is thinking…does he just want shit loads of footage of him causing a ruckus so that he can show his base that he’s truly one of them.", ">\n\nDon’t make me agree with you Matt", ">\n\nSo he can act like an ass for an audience", ">\n\nHell yea! Can he also add in pay per view for when he and McCarthy throw fists?", ">\n\nI think Gaetz liked how much of a fool cspan made McCarthy look.", ">\n\nI disrespectfully agree", ">\n\nDoes anyone else think Gaetz looks like Donny Osmond's evil, ugly twin?", ">\n\nHow can this be, I agree with him?", ">\n\nCongress acts more bipartisan and compromises more in legislation that has less public attention. Adding cameras to the floor is going to be used for grandstanding, forcing legislators to always be mindful of what they say to their colleagues and for sound bite generation. If you want an effective Congress you don't want cameras filming everything they do and everyone they talk to. The speeches and actual votes are what is important for the public to bear witness to.", ">\n\nNice! This will be great primary source material for historians a few centuries from now studying the dissolution of our country.", ">\n\nYes, please more footage of pathetic domestic terrorists like pedo gaetz", ">\n\nBring back? Where did they go?", ">\n\nC-Span uses the cameras that are controlled by the House when it’s in session. (Same for the Senate on C-Span 2). \nFor the opening of Congress however, C-Span is allowed to bring in its own cameras as well. So this bill would allow those cameras to return.", ">\n\nSo their Newt Gingrich-esque diatribes to no one in the middle of the night can be televised? Nah. No thanks.", ">\n\nWait is this like when we gave bodycams to cops and they just got more excited about fucking people up because now they had proof for their friends?", ">\n\nGuess I'm on the fence with this one... It does seem like we don't really need what our elected officials are up to in Congress going on behind closed doors.\nBut on the other hand, it would just encourage them to treat the whole thing as a performance. He probably loves all the footage recently of him sitting there smugly blocking the speaker vote. And McCarthy having to come yell at him. And that planned photo-op showing the phone being passed with Trump on the line, coming in to excerpt his influence and save the day.\nAnd, really... I don't think there's a ton of shady stuff going on in plain view on the floor. There are too many people there, and half of them want to see the other half crash and burn. On pretty much any topic, I'd expect them to force transparency on each other.\nI'm not sure what we gain, except making personal appearance and camera presence even more of a factor than before.", ">\n\nHe wants to be able to tell his 15 year olds he’s on the TV", ">\n\nYea so it can 100% be a performance at that point.", ">\n\nTranslation: me and my 20 pals are going to stage an endless shit show the next two years, and we really need our antics televised so we can grift off it.", ">\n\nNo, that's what they want to avoid. Now they control the cameras. We won't be seeing any more fights on the House floor.", ">\n\nMaybe he wants multiple cameras on him while making an ass of himself for attention", ">\n\nIdiot does something good?", ">\n\nPerformance art is all he's got--he's at a disadvantage without cameras.", ">\n\nIt's not going to do him the favors he thinks it will" ]

[]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops." ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review" ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?" ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it." ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?" ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?", ">\n\nonly to also incarcerate the person you where holding for 🤡" ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?", ">\n\nonly to also incarcerate the person you where holding for 🤡", ">\n\nOnly users lose drugs." ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?", ">\n\nonly to also incarcerate the person you where holding for 🤡", ">\n\nOnly users lose drugs.", ">\n\nThe employees told him no, quickly 37 times, while scratching their forearm frantically." ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?", ">\n\nonly to also incarcerate the person you where holding for 🤡", ">\n\nOnly users lose drugs.", ">\n\nThe employees told him no, quickly 37 times, while scratching their forearm frantically.", ">\n\nMath! I asked if I left my math homework!" ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?", ">\n\nonly to also incarcerate the person you where holding for 🤡", ">\n\nOnly users lose drugs.", ">\n\nThe employees told him no, quickly 37 times, while scratching their forearm frantically.", ">\n\nMath! I asked if I left my math homework!", ">\n\nMy roommate in college was a math major, and one day when he was taking a class on group theory, he shows me his homework and says \"Dude, check this out. My professor is making me do hard crystal math.\"" ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?", ">\n\nonly to also incarcerate the person you where holding for 🤡", ">\n\nOnly users lose drugs.", ">\n\nThe employees told him no, quickly 37 times, while scratching their forearm frantically.", ">\n\nMath! I asked if I left my math homework!", ">\n\nMy roommate in college was a math major, and one day when he was taking a class on group theory, he shows me his homework and says \"Dude, check this out. My professor is making me do hard crystal math.\"", ">\n\nSnitches get stitches" ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?", ">\n\nonly to also incarcerate the person you where holding for 🤡", ">\n\nOnly users lose drugs.", ">\n\nThe employees told him no, quickly 37 times, while scratching their forearm frantically.", ">\n\nMath! I asked if I left my math homework!", ">\n\nMy roommate in college was a math major, and one day when he was taking a class on group theory, he shows me his homework and says \"Dude, check this out. My professor is making me do hard crystal math.\"", ">\n\nSnitches get stitches", ">\n\nThis is the most “Indiana Man” headline I’ve ever seen" ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?", ">\n\nonly to also incarcerate the person you where holding for 🤡", ">\n\nOnly users lose drugs.", ">\n\nThe employees told him no, quickly 37 times, while scratching their forearm frantically.", ">\n\nMath! I asked if I left my math homework!", ">\n\nMy roommate in college was a math major, and one day when he was taking a class on group theory, he shows me his homework and says \"Dude, check this out. My professor is making me do hard crystal math.\"", ">\n\nSnitches get stitches", ">\n\nThis is the most “Indiana Man” headline I’ve ever seen", ">\n\nThat's not nice. Same thing happened to me, but I just kept the coke." ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?", ">\n\nonly to also incarcerate the person you where holding for 🤡", ">\n\nOnly users lose drugs.", ">\n\nThe employees told him no, quickly 37 times, while scratching their forearm frantically.", ">\n\nMath! I asked if I left my math homework!", ">\n\nMy roommate in college was a math major, and one day when he was taking a class on group theory, he shows me his homework and says \"Dude, check this out. My professor is making me do hard crystal math.\"", ">\n\nSnitches get stitches", ">\n\nThis is the most “Indiana Man” headline I’ve ever seen", ">\n\nThat's not nice. Same thing happened to me, but I just kept the coke.", ">\n\nMy gosh there are so many meth users." ]

[ "No honesty in business… took his meth and sold him off to the cops.", ">\n\nI hope he leaves them a bad Yelp review", ">\n\nHow is that illegal? Possession is illegal but if you don't actually possess it what law did you break?", ">\n\nIt can still be defined as possession if it belongs to you but someone else has custody of it.", ">\n\nWait, so the “I was only holding onto it for X” excuse has legal standing?", ">\n\nonly to also incarcerate the person you where holding for 🤡", ">\n\nOnly users lose drugs.", ">\n\nThe employees told him no, quickly 37 times, while scratching their forearm frantically.", ">\n\nMath! I asked if I left my math homework!", ">\n\nMy roommate in college was a math major, and one day when he was taking a class on group theory, he shows me his homework and says \"Dude, check this out. My professor is making me do hard crystal math.\"", ">\n\nSnitches get stitches", ">\n\nThis is the most “Indiana Man” headline I’ve ever seen", ">\n\nThat's not nice. Same thing happened to me, but I just kept the coke.", ">\n\nMy gosh there are so many meth users.", ">\n\nThe link is restricted for european readers.\nHopefully, he didn't have a lisp and wondered if he left his mess there." ]

[]

[ "So . . . luxury property sales in London and Dubai going up shortly?" ]

[ "So . . . luxury property sales in London and Dubai going up shortly?", ">\n\nAh! You know it" ]

[ "So . . . luxury property sales in London and Dubai going up shortly?", ">\n\nAh! You know it", ">\n\nI wish I could be optomistic that most of this money will go to help actual people affected and not line pockets in the form of bribes to \"get things done\" more easily." ]

[]

[ "Funny, I wonder why they might be protesting?" ]

[ "Funny, I wonder why they might be protesting?", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 86%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNational Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir said Monday police should begin cracking down on anti-government demonstrators who block roads, and reportedly plans on issuing new directives authorizing police to widely expand arrests of protesters.\nAccording to Kan, during a meeting at police headquarters in Jerusalem last week, Ben Gvir told senior officers that police had to end \"Discrimination between demonstrators on the left and those on the right.\"\nA senior police official denied any double standard, but told Channel 12 news that police in Jerusalem sometimes use more heavy-handed tactics due to the more combative nature of protests there as opposed to Tel Aviv, where organizers normally come to an agreement with police on blocking roads for a short period before dispersing.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: police^#1 block^#2 roads^#3 Ben^#4 Gvir^#5" ]

[ "Funny, I wonder why they might be protesting?", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 86%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNational Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir said Monday police should begin cracking down on anti-government demonstrators who block roads, and reportedly plans on issuing new directives authorizing police to widely expand arrests of protesters.\nAccording to Kan, during a meeting at police headquarters in Jerusalem last week, Ben Gvir told senior officers that police had to end \"Discrimination between demonstrators on the left and those on the right.\"\nA senior police official denied any double standard, but told Channel 12 news that police in Jerusalem sometimes use more heavy-handed tactics due to the more combative nature of protests there as opposed to Tel Aviv, where organizers normally come to an agreement with police on blocking roads for a short period before dispersing.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: police^#1 block^#2 roads^#3 Ben^#4 Gvir^#5", ">\n\nMan said “how fascist can I be without raising too many eyebrows”?" ]

[ "Funny, I wonder why they might be protesting?", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 86%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNational Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir said Monday police should begin cracking down on anti-government demonstrators who block roads, and reportedly plans on issuing new directives authorizing police to widely expand arrests of protesters.\nAccording to Kan, during a meeting at police headquarters in Jerusalem last week, Ben Gvir told senior officers that police had to end \"Discrimination between demonstrators on the left and those on the right.\"\nA senior police official denied any double standard, but told Channel 12 news that police in Jerusalem sometimes use more heavy-handed tactics due to the more combative nature of protests there as opposed to Tel Aviv, where organizers normally come to an agreement with police on blocking roads for a short period before dispersing.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: police^#1 block^#2 roads^#3 Ben^#4 Gvir^#5", ">\n\nMan said “how fascist can I be without raising too many eyebrows”?", ">\n\nAnd also charge them if they actually prevent emergency services from getting through. Manslaughter reckless endangerment something" ]

[ "Funny, I wonder why they might be protesting?", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 86%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNational Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir said Monday police should begin cracking down on anti-government demonstrators who block roads, and reportedly plans on issuing new directives authorizing police to widely expand arrests of protesters.\nAccording to Kan, during a meeting at police headquarters in Jerusalem last week, Ben Gvir told senior officers that police had to end \"Discrimination between demonstrators on the left and those on the right.\"\nA senior police official denied any double standard, but told Channel 12 news that police in Jerusalem sometimes use more heavy-handed tactics due to the more combative nature of protests there as opposed to Tel Aviv, where organizers normally come to an agreement with police on blocking roads for a short period before dispersing.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: police^#1 block^#2 roads^#3 Ben^#4 Gvir^#5", ">\n\nMan said “how fascist can I be without raising too many eyebrows”?", ">\n\nAnd also charge them if they actually prevent emergency services from getting through. Manslaughter reckless endangerment something", ">\n\nThis is the government that since beginning of 2023 has killed more Palestinian children than the Iranian government has executed protesters. Let that sink in for a moment." ]

[ "Funny, I wonder why they might be protesting?", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 86%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nNational Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir said Monday police should begin cracking down on anti-government demonstrators who block roads, and reportedly plans on issuing new directives authorizing police to widely expand arrests of protesters.\nAccording to Kan, during a meeting at police headquarters in Jerusalem last week, Ben Gvir told senior officers that police had to end \"Discrimination between demonstrators on the left and those on the right.\"\nA senior police official denied any double standard, but told Channel 12 news that police in Jerusalem sometimes use more heavy-handed tactics due to the more combative nature of protests there as opposed to Tel Aviv, where organizers normally come to an agreement with police on blocking roads for a short period before dispersing.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: police^#1 block^#2 roads^#3 Ben^#4 Gvir^#5", ">\n\nMan said “how fascist can I be without raising too many eyebrows”?", ">\n\nAnd also charge them if they actually prevent emergency services from getting through. Manslaughter reckless endangerment something", ">\n\nThis is the government that since beginning of 2023 has killed more Palestinian children than the Iranian government has executed protesters. Let that sink in for a moment.", ">\n\nAside from being disingenuous - the two “children” were teenagers throwing Molotov cocktails - this isn’t even true, as Iran has executed two protesters this year and sentenced several more to death." ]

[]

[ "Must not be a very good air defence system" ]

[]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people.", ">\n\nJapan is going to attack Australia eh? There are precisely zero Japanese nationalists saying Japan should do an unprovoked first strike against Australia. And it would be moot anyways because Japan doesn't have long range missiles.\nCompare that to China with their huge arsenal of long range missiles and their nationalists saying China should take out bases in northern Australia to improve their Taiwan invasion chances." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people.", ">\n\nJapan is going to attack Australia eh? There are precisely zero Japanese nationalists saying Japan should do an unprovoked first strike against Australia. And it would be moot anyways because Japan doesn't have long range missiles.\nCompare that to China with their huge arsenal of long range missiles and their nationalists saying China should take out bases in northern Australia to improve their Taiwan invasion chances.", ">\n\nYeah, hey China, 411, yes, history repeats itself, but with different actors in different roles... YOU'RE the aggressor this time around!" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people.", ">\n\nJapan is going to attack Australia eh? There are precisely zero Japanese nationalists saying Japan should do an unprovoked first strike against Australia. And it would be moot anyways because Japan doesn't have long range missiles.\nCompare that to China with their huge arsenal of long range missiles and their nationalists saying China should take out bases in northern Australia to improve their Taiwan invasion chances.", ">\n\nYeah, hey China, 411, yes, history repeats itself, but with different actors in different roles... YOU'RE the aggressor this time around!", ">\n\nThey've learnt about human rights abuses and aren't afraid of using them" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people.", ">\n\nJapan is going to attack Australia eh? There are precisely zero Japanese nationalists saying Japan should do an unprovoked first strike against Australia. And it would be moot anyways because Japan doesn't have long range missiles.\nCompare that to China with their huge arsenal of long range missiles and their nationalists saying China should take out bases in northern Australia to improve their Taiwan invasion chances.", ">\n\nYeah, hey China, 411, yes, history repeats itself, but with different actors in different roles... YOU'RE the aggressor this time around!", ">\n\nThey've learnt about human rights abuses and aren't afraid of using them", ">\n\nAs long as he doesn't invoke WWIII, I that's that's okay." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people.", ">\n\nJapan is going to attack Australia eh? There are precisely zero Japanese nationalists saying Japan should do an unprovoked first strike against Australia. And it would be moot anyways because Japan doesn't have long range missiles.\nCompare that to China with their huge arsenal of long range missiles and their nationalists saying China should take out bases in northern Australia to improve their Taiwan invasion chances.", ">\n\nYeah, hey China, 411, yes, history repeats itself, but with different actors in different roles... YOU'RE the aggressor this time around!", ">\n\nThey've learnt about human rights abuses and aren't afraid of using them", ">\n\nAs long as he doesn't invoke WWIII, I that's that's okay.", ">\n\nObviously the Chinese have uncovered Japan's plot to drop a space colony on Sydney." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people.", ">\n\nJapan is going to attack Australia eh? There are precisely zero Japanese nationalists saying Japan should do an unprovoked first strike against Australia. And it would be moot anyways because Japan doesn't have long range missiles.\nCompare that to China with their huge arsenal of long range missiles and their nationalists saying China should take out bases in northern Australia to improve their Taiwan invasion chances.", ">\n\nYeah, hey China, 411, yes, history repeats itself, but with different actors in different roles... YOU'RE the aggressor this time around!", ">\n\nThey've learnt about human rights abuses and aren't afraid of using them", ">\n\nAs long as he doesn't invoke WWIII, I that's that's okay.", ">\n\nObviously the Chinese have uncovered Japan's plot to drop a space colony on Sydney.", ">\n\nThe global hegemony means “you are with us or against us”, which is a message well received by both Japan and Australia. Neither government has much say about what they can do and what will happen for the future of their countries. It's naive of the Chinese ambassador trying to share a different perspective with the Australian public.\nI won't be surprised if the western media tell the public that it was Chinese army put boots on Australia soil; or it was the Chinese tried to overthrow their elected government." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people.", ">\n\nJapan is going to attack Australia eh? There are precisely zero Japanese nationalists saying Japan should do an unprovoked first strike against Australia. And it would be moot anyways because Japan doesn't have long range missiles.\nCompare that to China with their huge arsenal of long range missiles and their nationalists saying China should take out bases in northern Australia to improve their Taiwan invasion chances.", ">\n\nYeah, hey China, 411, yes, history repeats itself, but with different actors in different roles... YOU'RE the aggressor this time around!", ">\n\nThey've learnt about human rights abuses and aren't afraid of using them", ">\n\nAs long as he doesn't invoke WWIII, I that's that's okay.", ">\n\nObviously the Chinese have uncovered Japan's plot to drop a space colony on Sydney.", ">\n\nThe global hegemony means “you are with us or against us”, which is a message well received by both Japan and Australia. Neither government has much say about what they can do and what will happen for the future of their countries. It's naive of the Chinese ambassador trying to share a different perspective with the Australian public.\nI won't be surprised if the western media tell the public that it was Chinese army put boots on Australia soil; or it was the Chinese tried to overthrow their elected government.", ">\n\nThe state of geopolitics as they are right now is akin to a magical trick having been exposed. \nOnce the secret has been revealed you loose interest. The world is loosing interest in China's, Russia's et al BS.\nYou can never let your guard down though. There is an abundance of magic tricks and slight of hand techniques out there. \nDisenchanted with the fascination of these upcoming superpower countries. The OG superpower countries have already shown their true colours, and the reality has been established for the rest...cannon fodder.\nReality checks have always been a bitch to deal with." ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people.", ">\n\nJapan is going to attack Australia eh? There are precisely zero Japanese nationalists saying Japan should do an unprovoked first strike against Australia. And it would be moot anyways because Japan doesn't have long range missiles.\nCompare that to China with their huge arsenal of long range missiles and their nationalists saying China should take out bases in northern Australia to improve their Taiwan invasion chances.", ">\n\nYeah, hey China, 411, yes, history repeats itself, but with different actors in different roles... YOU'RE the aggressor this time around!", ">\n\nThey've learnt about human rights abuses and aren't afraid of using them", ">\n\nAs long as he doesn't invoke WWIII, I that's that's okay.", ">\n\nObviously the Chinese have uncovered Japan's plot to drop a space colony on Sydney.", ">\n\nThe global hegemony means “you are with us or against us”, which is a message well received by both Japan and Australia. Neither government has much say about what they can do and what will happen for the future of their countries. It's naive of the Chinese ambassador trying to share a different perspective with the Australian public.\nI won't be surprised if the western media tell the public that it was Chinese army put boots on Australia soil; or it was the Chinese tried to overthrow their elected government.", ">\n\nThe state of geopolitics as they are right now is akin to a magical trick having been exposed. \nOnce the secret has been revealed you loose interest. The world is loosing interest in China's, Russia's et al BS.\nYou can never let your guard down though. There is an abundance of magic tricks and slight of hand techniques out there. \nDisenchanted with the fascination of these upcoming superpower countries. The OG superpower countries have already shown their true colours, and the reality has been established for the rest...cannon fodder.\nReality checks have always been a bitch to deal with.", ">\n\nWould Australia talking about getting even more submarines, because China warned them that they might be attacked count as willful compliance?" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people.", ">\n\nJapan is going to attack Australia eh? There are precisely zero Japanese nationalists saying Japan should do an unprovoked first strike against Australia. And it would be moot anyways because Japan doesn't have long range missiles.\nCompare that to China with their huge arsenal of long range missiles and their nationalists saying China should take out bases in northern Australia to improve their Taiwan invasion chances.", ">\n\nYeah, hey China, 411, yes, history repeats itself, but with different actors in different roles... YOU'RE the aggressor this time around!", ">\n\nThey've learnt about human rights abuses and aren't afraid of using them", ">\n\nAs long as he doesn't invoke WWIII, I that's that's okay.", ">\n\nObviously the Chinese have uncovered Japan's plot to drop a space colony on Sydney.", ">\n\nThe global hegemony means “you are with us or against us”, which is a message well received by both Japan and Australia. Neither government has much say about what they can do and what will happen for the future of their countries. It's naive of the Chinese ambassador trying to share a different perspective with the Australian public.\nI won't be surprised if the western media tell the public that it was Chinese army put boots on Australia soil; or it was the Chinese tried to overthrow their elected government.", ">\n\nThe state of geopolitics as they are right now is akin to a magical trick having been exposed. \nOnce the secret has been revealed you loose interest. The world is loosing interest in China's, Russia's et al BS.\nYou can never let your guard down though. There is an abundance of magic tricks and slight of hand techniques out there. \nDisenchanted with the fascination of these upcoming superpower countries. The OG superpower countries have already shown their true colours, and the reality has been established for the rest...cannon fodder.\nReality checks have always been a bitch to deal with.", ">\n\nWould Australia talking about getting even more submarines, because China warned them that they might be attacked count as willful compliance?", ">\n\nUgh. That submarine deal was a national headache" ]

[ "Imagine saying this and expecting to be taken seriously lol", ">\n\nIn China, you would be disappeared if you publicly refuted this clown. So, yes, in ccp China, and, no, everywhere else.", ">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nChina's ambassador has criticised his Japanese counterpart in Canberra, accusing him of not doing his job properly and suggesting Tokyo may once again launch a military attack on Australia in the future.\nJapan's ambassador Shingo Yamagami - who has repeatedly criticised China since taking up the post - in an interview published yesterday in The Australian warned that both Australia and Japan needed to remain \"Vigilant\" as Beijing continued to act aggressively towards other countries in the region, despite taking a softer public tone.\nThe restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China has raised hopes that the two countries may be able to find a way to wind back a series of trade punishments Beijing has imposed on Australia, both through formal sanctions and informal bans on some Australian products.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 Australian^#2 China^#3 might^#4 country^#5", ">\n\nWho would’ve thought? China is kindly stepping forward to support Australia against a threat that doesn’t exist, I’m guessing they’re after a “Belarus” state", ">\n\nThey're already getting a few with the island states around Australia", ">\n\nI didn’t know they already have that much influence, it’s far more than I thought", ">\n\nThey are certainly trying.", ">\n\nWhat makes them seek that? They can’t be that desperate for china’s cheap products, are they?", ">\n\nIt’s a response to the perceived historical mistreatment by successive Australian and NZ govts. They haven’t provided them enough attention or support (in their eyes) citing ongoing instability, nepotism and corruption in island govts. \nThis is the latest attempt to gain attention.", ">\n\n“You treat us bad so now we’re gonna go with the guy lurking around the school” type of situation? \nOr is it something else?", ">\n\nThey know that strategically with AUKUS, 5 eyes and recent instability in “South China sea” that Australia, NZ and others in the region cannot allow China to obtain the influence/foothold they have achieved further north.\nThe recent “naval base” and police support in The Solomons was a big eye opener and has driven a lot of behavioural change at a cabinet level. Solid play by them pacific islands", ">\n\nJust because there is restoration of high-level meetings between Australia and China does not mean Australia should let its guard down. \nChina is like Russia. It will try to lure you with sweet talk and favorable trade deal and when the moment is right, weaponize it to get what they want as Australia found out.\nWhen the Chinese ambassador made comment that Japan may attack Australia in the future like it did in the past, I just laughed.", ">\n\nTo be honest most of us here gave that a laugh.", ">\n\nOn the same day, from the same mouth:\n\nAustralia should ghost the US and UK, quit QUAD, stop buying submarines.\nWatch out, Japan is totally going to attack Australia.\n\nIf Japan was about to attack, wouldn't Australia want BFFs and submarines? Or is China offering to protect Australia from Japan and the English-speaking world?", ">\n\nThe only safe place is prostrating yourself before immortal emperor xi", ">\n\nThat's god-emperor xi for you", ">\n\nSomeone give me the cliff notes on how Winnie The Pooh went from the forest to the head of China? I clearly stopped paying attention to these books after childhood.", ">\n\nWhat an absolute joke. Australia and Japan are reaching new heights in military cooperation as we speak.", ">\n\nThanks for the laughs China", ">\n\nIronically, an argument could be made that, if not for Japan's invasion of China, the CCP would have had a far more difficult time taking over China. It could even be speculated that the Nationalist party would have eventually defeated the less powerful Communist Party were it not for the economic and military devastation in China before and especially during WW2 caused by fighting Japan.", ">\n\nAnd nothing would be different except the name of the country.", ">\n\nWell, we probably wouldn't have Taiwan at all, just a KMT dictatorship instead of the CCP. That's a pretty big difference.\nUnless you think the CCP would have fled to Taiwan and transitioned to democracy if they'd lost instead :D", ">\n\nChinese propaganda uses victim complex to make Chinese disrust everyone except their government, revoking old history. Just like Russian propaganda.", ">\n\nSo they are trying to drum up distrust towards Japan, the place known for anime and being pacifist that pretty much everyone is cool with. I don't see that working.", ">\n\nWow, the CCP is such a pretentious shit for presuming to speak for the Chinese people, especially over this issue.", ">\n\nThey’re not presuming. They do speak for China in any international or national dialogue. Any other organization speaking on behalf of China is outlawed. \nYou may not support them but don’t forget who is actually in charge, I’ll give you a hint “It’s not the people of China”.", ">\n\nThey may run China, and of course they speak for the Chinese government, but they do not speak for the Chinese people.", ">\n\nJapan is going to attack Australia eh? There are precisely zero Japanese nationalists saying Japan should do an unprovoked first strike against Australia. And it would be moot anyways because Japan doesn't have long range missiles.\nCompare that to China with their huge arsenal of long range missiles and their nationalists saying China should take out bases in northern Australia to improve their Taiwan invasion chances.", ">\n\nYeah, hey China, 411, yes, history repeats itself, but with different actors in different roles... YOU'RE the aggressor this time around!", ">\n\nThey've learnt about human rights abuses and aren't afraid of using them", ">\n\nAs long as he doesn't invoke WWIII, I that's that's okay.", ">\n\nObviously the Chinese have uncovered Japan's plot to drop a space colony on Sydney.", ">\n\nThe global hegemony means “you are with us or against us”, which is a message well received by both Japan and Australia. Neither government has much say about what they can do and what will happen for the future of their countries. It's naive of the Chinese ambassador trying to share a different perspective with the Australian public.\nI won't be surprised if the western media tell the public that it was Chinese army put boots on Australia soil; or it was the Chinese tried to overthrow their elected government.", ">\n\nThe state of geopolitics as they are right now is akin to a magical trick having been exposed. \nOnce the secret has been revealed you loose interest. The world is loosing interest in China's, Russia's et al BS.\nYou can never let your guard down though. There is an abundance of magic tricks and slight of hand techniques out there. \nDisenchanted with the fascination of these upcoming superpower countries. The OG superpower countries have already shown their true colours, and the reality has been established for the rest...cannon fodder.\nReality checks have always been a bitch to deal with.", ">\n\nWould Australia talking about getting even more submarines, because China warned them that they might be attacked count as willful compliance?", ">\n\nUgh. That submarine deal was a national headache", ">\n\nLol, when has an Australian submarine deal not been a complete mess?" ]

[]

[ "Someone needs to get the Irish fishermen to send them running again." ]

[ "Someone needs to get the Irish fishermen to send them running again.", ">\n\nSo they won't be caught with their pants down like Moskava?" ]

[]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"" ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…" ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…", ">\n\nCutting funding to Ukraine is revenge for not playing ball with Trump." ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…", ">\n\nCutting funding to Ukraine is revenge for not playing ball with Trump.", ">\n\nIts going to be interesting to see how the military industrial complex deals with this. Cause I dont think this is going to go as well as some folks think. Theres a LOT of money there. And these folks really are going after it at a time where we are actually supporting a minor conflict." ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…", ">\n\nCutting funding to Ukraine is revenge for not playing ball with Trump.", ">\n\nIts going to be interesting to see how the military industrial complex deals with this. Cause I dont think this is going to go as well as some folks think. Theres a LOT of money there. And these folks really are going after it at a time where we are actually supporting a minor conflict.", ">\n\nAnd much of that money is sunk in red states where they manufacture a lot of this stuff." ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…", ">\n\nCutting funding to Ukraine is revenge for not playing ball with Trump.", ">\n\nIts going to be interesting to see how the military industrial complex deals with this. Cause I dont think this is going to go as well as some folks think. Theres a LOT of money there. And these folks really are going after it at a time where we are actually supporting a minor conflict.", ">\n\nAnd much of that money is sunk in red states where they manufacture a lot of this stuff.", ">\n\n\"We support or military!\" - Immediately cuts their budget." ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…", ">\n\nCutting funding to Ukraine is revenge for not playing ball with Trump.", ">\n\nIts going to be interesting to see how the military industrial complex deals with this. Cause I dont think this is going to go as well as some folks think. Theres a LOT of money there. And these folks really are going after it at a time where we are actually supporting a minor conflict.", ">\n\nAnd much of that money is sunk in red states where they manufacture a lot of this stuff.", ">\n\n\"We support or military!\" - Immediately cuts their budget.", ">\n\nCutting military spending would obviously be good for the country, so I have no idea why some Republicans are backing that." ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…", ">\n\nCutting funding to Ukraine is revenge for not playing ball with Trump.", ">\n\nIts going to be interesting to see how the military industrial complex deals with this. Cause I dont think this is going to go as well as some folks think. Theres a LOT of money there. And these folks really are going after it at a time where we are actually supporting a minor conflict.", ">\n\nAnd much of that money is sunk in red states where they manufacture a lot of this stuff.", ">\n\n\"We support or military!\" - Immediately cuts their budget.", ">\n\nCutting military spending would obviously be good for the country, so I have no idea why some Republicans are backing that.", ">\n\nThey don’t want to cut defense spending they just want to cut support for Ukraine (like their Russian handlers demanded)." ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…", ">\n\nCutting funding to Ukraine is revenge for not playing ball with Trump.", ">\n\nIts going to be interesting to see how the military industrial complex deals with this. Cause I dont think this is going to go as well as some folks think. Theres a LOT of money there. And these folks really are going after it at a time where we are actually supporting a minor conflict.", ">\n\nAnd much of that money is sunk in red states where they manufacture a lot of this stuff.", ">\n\n\"We support or military!\" - Immediately cuts their budget.", ">\n\nCutting military spending would obviously be good for the country, so I have no idea why some Republicans are backing that.", ">\n\nThey don’t want to cut defense spending they just want to cut support for Ukraine (like their Russian handlers demanded).", ">\n\nThe US needs to spend on Defense the same amount that they recommend of the rest of NATO. Two percent of GDP." ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…", ">\n\nCutting funding to Ukraine is revenge for not playing ball with Trump.", ">\n\nIts going to be interesting to see how the military industrial complex deals with this. Cause I dont think this is going to go as well as some folks think. Theres a LOT of money there. And these folks really are going after it at a time where we are actually supporting a minor conflict.", ">\n\nAnd much of that money is sunk in red states where they manufacture a lot of this stuff.", ">\n\n\"We support or military!\" - Immediately cuts their budget.", ">\n\nCutting military spending would obviously be good for the country, so I have no idea why some Republicans are backing that.", ">\n\nThey don’t want to cut defense spending they just want to cut support for Ukraine (like their Russian handlers demanded).", ">\n\nThe US needs to spend on Defense the same amount that they recommend of the rest of NATO. Two percent of GDP.", ">\n\nSo $4-500 billion?" ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…", ">\n\nCutting funding to Ukraine is revenge for not playing ball with Trump.", ">\n\nIts going to be interesting to see how the military industrial complex deals with this. Cause I dont think this is going to go as well as some folks think. Theres a LOT of money there. And these folks really are going after it at a time where we are actually supporting a minor conflict.", ">\n\nAnd much of that money is sunk in red states where they manufacture a lot of this stuff.", ">\n\n\"We support or military!\" - Immediately cuts their budget.", ">\n\nCutting military spending would obviously be good for the country, so I have no idea why some Republicans are backing that.", ">\n\nThey don’t want to cut defense spending they just want to cut support for Ukraine (like their Russian handlers demanded).", ">\n\nThe US needs to spend on Defense the same amount that they recommend of the rest of NATO. Two percent of GDP.", ">\n\nSo $4-500 billion?", ">\n\nYes. $450B is acceptable with the savings providing the social nets enjoyed by every other first world country." ]

[ "Excerpt \nWhat's happening: Conservative rebels extracted an agreement during the speaker fight to cap 2024 discretionary spending at fiscal year 2022 levels. Unless the Pentagon is exempted, that could result in a potential $75 billion drop in defense spending, according to Bloomberg.\nRep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), a McCarthy ally backed by the Freedom Caucus, confirmed as much when asked about military spending on \"Fox News Sunday\": \"We got a $32 trillion debt. Everything has to be on the table.\"\nThat comment drew a bristling op-ed from the conservative-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial board, which wrote: \"The reality is that if defense is cut, what will go first is spending for operations and maintenance to sustain military readiness, as well as money for the weapons to deter China.\"", ">\n\nNot gonna happen. It’s the one thing both parties agree on. Bombs good!\nNow some Republicans might want to cut Ukraine funding because they’re a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kremlin…", ">\n\nCutting funding to Ukraine is revenge for not playing ball with Trump.", ">\n\nIts going to be interesting to see how the military industrial complex deals with this. Cause I dont think this is going to go as well as some folks think. Theres a LOT of money there. And these folks really are going after it at a time where we are actually supporting a minor conflict.", ">\n\nAnd much of that money is sunk in red states where they manufacture a lot of this stuff.", ">\n\n\"We support or military!\" - Immediately cuts their budget.", ">\n\nCutting military spending would obviously be good for the country, so I have no idea why some Republicans are backing that.", ">\n\nThey don’t want to cut defense spending they just want to cut support for Ukraine (like their Russian handlers demanded).", ">\n\nThe US needs to spend on Defense the same amount that they recommend of the rest of NATO. Two percent of GDP.", ">\n\nSo $4-500 billion?", ">\n\nYes. $450B is acceptable with the savings providing the social nets enjoyed by every other first world country.", ">\n\n\nwith the savings providing the social nets\n\nHow are you funding years 3 on?" ]

[]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk" ]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk", ">\n\nAll I can say is I’m glad that this is an unpopular opinion." ]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk", ">\n\nAll I can say is I’m glad that this is an unpopular opinion.", ">\n\nDon’t you dare insult Miguel like that ever again." ]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk", ">\n\nAll I can say is I’m glad that this is an unpopular opinion.", ">\n\nDon’t you dare insult Miguel like that ever again.", ">\n\nTrue. I personally hate that movie." ]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk", ">\n\nAll I can say is I’m glad that this is an unpopular opinion.", ">\n\nDon’t you dare insult Miguel like that ever again.", ">\n\nTrue. I personally hate that movie.", ">\n\nFamily was really unlikable" ]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk", ">\n\nAll I can say is I’m glad that this is an unpopular opinion.", ">\n\nDon’t you dare insult Miguel like that ever again.", ">\n\nTrue. I personally hate that movie.", ">\n\nFamily was really unlikable", ">\n\nDisney 2010s: your grandparents are mean and holding you back!" ]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk", ">\n\nAll I can say is I’m glad that this is an unpopular opinion.", ">\n\nDon’t you dare insult Miguel like that ever again.", ">\n\nTrue. I personally hate that movie.", ">\n\nFamily was really unlikable", ">\n\nDisney 2010s: your grandparents are mean and holding you back!", ">\n\nMore abusive and controlling than mean." ]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk", ">\n\nAll I can say is I’m glad that this is an unpopular opinion.", ">\n\nDon’t you dare insult Miguel like that ever again.", ">\n\nTrue. I personally hate that movie.", ">\n\nFamily was really unlikable", ">\n\nDisney 2010s: your grandparents are mean and holding you back!", ">\n\nMore abusive and controlling than mean.", ">\n\nWatched it like 5 years after its release.\nSadly, expected more. I am sure it is a good movie but with the hype it was just fine. Had possibility." ]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk", ">\n\nAll I can say is I’m glad that this is an unpopular opinion.", ">\n\nDon’t you dare insult Miguel like that ever again.", ">\n\nTrue. I personally hate that movie.", ">\n\nFamily was really unlikable", ">\n\nDisney 2010s: your grandparents are mean and holding you back!", ">\n\nMore abusive and controlling than mean.", ">\n\nWatched it like 5 years after its release.\nSadly, expected more. I am sure it is a good movie but with the hype it was just fine. Had possibility.", ">\n\nDisney relies too heavily on wanting to make their audience cry and “feel”. I always see it coming. This is why I tend to avoid them and look for more light hearted stuff for my kids. Like 80’s family comedies. Like I literally ordered the movie, bought popcorn etc I don’t want to see my kids crying and miserable on the dang sofa 30 mins in bc Disney off’d another parent. One exception is zootopia. Now THAT was a well done kids movie!" ]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk", ">\n\nAll I can say is I’m glad that this is an unpopular opinion.", ">\n\nDon’t you dare insult Miguel like that ever again.", ">\n\nTrue. I personally hate that movie.", ">\n\nFamily was really unlikable", ">\n\nDisney 2010s: your grandparents are mean and holding you back!", ">\n\nMore abusive and controlling than mean.", ">\n\nWatched it like 5 years after its release.\nSadly, expected more. I am sure it is a good movie but with the hype it was just fine. Had possibility.", ">\n\nDisney relies too heavily on wanting to make their audience cry and “feel”. I always see it coming. This is why I tend to avoid them and look for more light hearted stuff for my kids. Like 80’s family comedies. Like I literally ordered the movie, bought popcorn etc I don’t want to see my kids crying and miserable on the dang sofa 30 mins in bc Disney off’d another parent. One exception is zootopia. Now THAT was a well done kids movie!", ">\n\nHave you gone Coco-Nuts?! That movie was totally- I understand how you feel. I have the same opinion." ]

[ "Upvoted because you're a heretic. How dare you besmirch this beloved film! /jk", ">\n\nAll I can say is I’m glad that this is an unpopular opinion.", ">\n\nDon’t you dare insult Miguel like that ever again.", ">\n\nTrue. I personally hate that movie.", ">\n\nFamily was really unlikable", ">\n\nDisney 2010s: your grandparents are mean and holding you back!", ">\n\nMore abusive and controlling than mean.", ">\n\nWatched it like 5 years after its release.\nSadly, expected more. I am sure it is a good movie but with the hype it was just fine. Had possibility.", ">\n\nDisney relies too heavily on wanting to make their audience cry and “feel”. I always see it coming. This is why I tend to avoid them and look for more light hearted stuff for my kids. Like 80’s family comedies. Like I literally ordered the movie, bought popcorn etc I don’t want to see my kids crying and miserable on the dang sofa 30 mins in bc Disney off’d another parent. One exception is zootopia. Now THAT was a well done kids movie!", ">\n\nHave you gone Coco-Nuts?! That movie was totally- I understand how you feel. I have the same opinion.", ">\n\nI primarily despise this film because my mom is freaking obsessed over it. I'm Hispanic with that culture drowning me I'm not impressed." ]

[]

[ "just out of curiosity; what's the price range to get something like this done to a barebones board?" ]

[ "just out of curiosity; what's the price range to get something like this done to a barebones board?", ">\n\nIf you have to ask, you can't afford it /s\nSeriously though, same Q!" ]

[ "just out of curiosity; what's the price range to get something like this done to a barebones board?", ">\n\nIf you have to ask, you can't afford it /s\nSeriously though, same Q!", ">\n\nif anyone cares to follow/support what we love to do here a link" ]