comment
stringlengths 1
9.86k
| context
sequencelengths 0
530
|
|---|---|
>
Good. No one here wants every insecure loser carrying around a gun.. | [
"Not sure how this law is meant to reduce gun violence as real dangerous ppl will ignore this law and carry it anyway.",
">\n\nRemember folks, no one is coming after your guns. Don't be so paranoid. /s",
">\n\nAll while the Democrats pass a massive gun ban bill in the House last year and the President himself swears he's coming for your guns. Talk about ignoring reality, lol.",
">\n\nSeems pretty reasonable to me. 16 hours of training seems a little low, if it's one hour per day that's a little over 2 weeks of training. Having it higher would probably make it prohibitively difficult to pass though",
">\n\n\n16 hours of training seems a little low,\n\nI look forward to licensing getting struck down altogether because antis couldn't be reasonable about training requirements. feels a little low isn't going to be a compelling justification in courts.",
">\n\nAnd this will disproportionately impact low-income, minority communities who may struggle with access to and finding time to have 16 hours of training.",
">\n\nI didn't know I was supposed to bribe my county sheriff to get a permit. And now the new guy apparently doesn't take bribes. \nSo unfair!",
">\n\nas long as the second amendment and the supreme court exist in their present form, they're just wasting their time.",
">\n\nThe policies that have the biggest impact on gun homicides are stand you ground laws and concealed carry.",
">\n\nReminder that from the founding of this nation up until a little over a decade ago, states enjoyed the constitutional authority to ban concealed carry, ban certain types of firearms, and even ban the public carrying and display of firearms not connected with militia service.\nWhy did this change? Was it because constitutional scholars suddenly had an epiphany and realized that they had been wrongly interpreting 2A this whole time? \nNo.\nIt changed because the GOP, with the help of the Federalist Society, installed a wholly corrupt conservative supreme court majority that actively did the gun lobby's bidding by expanding 2A to wrest the power of firearm regulation from the states and confer a right of firearm possession for individual self defense, a right the constitution never intended. \nThis complete perversion of 2A - which stands in contradiction to nearly 200 years of precedent - has made it nearly impossible to set firearm restrictions at the state level. \nAnd the intended result of this hijacking of the constitution? The gun lobby can sell more guns in more states, and then pump those increased profits into the pockets of the GOP and the Federalist Society, which in turn used those funds to install more gun lobby-friendly politicians and judges.",
">\n\nInstead of spreading disinformation by attacking the GOP, I suggest you read the 14th amendment as to why states can't pass unconstitutional laws that violate any amendment.",
">\n\nPeople shouldn't be allowed to carry guns in public, except on hunting land, PERIOD.",
">\n\nWhen we have cops that A do their job and B do it fairly I’ll happily entertain the notion. Even as a gun owner I’d love if they had no use outside shooting sports. Like a racecar or something that you just take to the track and that’s it. It should be a leisure activity not daily life or death. But right now they just show up to ignore active shooters, protect bigots causing trouble, and shoot innocent people (“comically”, cops are far more likely to shoot innocent people, and commit violent crimes in general, than ccw holders, even using the shrunken data pool of “crimes cops actually get convicted for”)\nThe guns are out there, more than enough for everyone, and an increasingly violent group of hateful assholes, all well armed, empowered by actual elected politicians are out there advocating for, and perpetuating, what can only be described as terrorist attacks. Shit we had one candidate advocating for stoning queer folk to death. \nI’ve suffered enough violence in my life simply for being who I am, shit, I have friends who have name’s tattood on them of friends they’ve lost for the same, to be willing to just cast my safety at the feet of the police and pray that they’ll help me, cops who seem to only show up to protect the groups that wish me ill.",
">\n\nI hear ya. I never claimed it would be easy, or even possible. Just my ideal.",
">\n\nFor sure, I totally get it. \nAnd cheers, thanks for indulging me. I definitely struggle to balance ideals vs pragmatic actions, especially when the systemic issues are so broad and underpin all of it. I have ideas, but I worry we will never have a government socialist leaning enough to address the core problems of wealth inequality, violent ideologies, police oppression, and a lack of social safety nets and actual community identity in this country. It’s hard not to be pessimistic but damn this road is dark, and the biggest sign to me is that attempting to fix one symptom risks greatly exacerbating others."
] |
> | [
"Not sure how this law is meant to reduce gun violence as real dangerous ppl will ignore this law and carry it anyway.",
">\n\nRemember folks, no one is coming after your guns. Don't be so paranoid. /s",
">\n\nAll while the Democrats pass a massive gun ban bill in the House last year and the President himself swears he's coming for your guns. Talk about ignoring reality, lol.",
">\n\nSeems pretty reasonable to me. 16 hours of training seems a little low, if it's one hour per day that's a little over 2 weeks of training. Having it higher would probably make it prohibitively difficult to pass though",
">\n\n\n16 hours of training seems a little low,\n\nI look forward to licensing getting struck down altogether because antis couldn't be reasonable about training requirements. feels a little low isn't going to be a compelling justification in courts.",
">\n\nAnd this will disproportionately impact low-income, minority communities who may struggle with access to and finding time to have 16 hours of training.",
">\n\nI didn't know I was supposed to bribe my county sheriff to get a permit. And now the new guy apparently doesn't take bribes. \nSo unfair!",
">\n\nas long as the second amendment and the supreme court exist in their present form, they're just wasting their time.",
">\n\nThe policies that have the biggest impact on gun homicides are stand you ground laws and concealed carry.",
">\n\nReminder that from the founding of this nation up until a little over a decade ago, states enjoyed the constitutional authority to ban concealed carry, ban certain types of firearms, and even ban the public carrying and display of firearms not connected with militia service.\nWhy did this change? Was it because constitutional scholars suddenly had an epiphany and realized that they had been wrongly interpreting 2A this whole time? \nNo.\nIt changed because the GOP, with the help of the Federalist Society, installed a wholly corrupt conservative supreme court majority that actively did the gun lobby's bidding by expanding 2A to wrest the power of firearm regulation from the states and confer a right of firearm possession for individual self defense, a right the constitution never intended. \nThis complete perversion of 2A - which stands in contradiction to nearly 200 years of precedent - has made it nearly impossible to set firearm restrictions at the state level. \nAnd the intended result of this hijacking of the constitution? The gun lobby can sell more guns in more states, and then pump those increased profits into the pockets of the GOP and the Federalist Society, which in turn used those funds to install more gun lobby-friendly politicians and judges.",
">\n\nInstead of spreading disinformation by attacking the GOP, I suggest you read the 14th amendment as to why states can't pass unconstitutional laws that violate any amendment.",
">\n\nPeople shouldn't be allowed to carry guns in public, except on hunting land, PERIOD.",
">\n\nWhen we have cops that A do their job and B do it fairly I’ll happily entertain the notion. Even as a gun owner I’d love if they had no use outside shooting sports. Like a racecar or something that you just take to the track and that’s it. It should be a leisure activity not daily life or death. But right now they just show up to ignore active shooters, protect bigots causing trouble, and shoot innocent people (“comically”, cops are far more likely to shoot innocent people, and commit violent crimes in general, than ccw holders, even using the shrunken data pool of “crimes cops actually get convicted for”)\nThe guns are out there, more than enough for everyone, and an increasingly violent group of hateful assholes, all well armed, empowered by actual elected politicians are out there advocating for, and perpetuating, what can only be described as terrorist attacks. Shit we had one candidate advocating for stoning queer folk to death. \nI’ve suffered enough violence in my life simply for being who I am, shit, I have friends who have name’s tattood on them of friends they’ve lost for the same, to be willing to just cast my safety at the feet of the police and pray that they’ll help me, cops who seem to only show up to protect the groups that wish me ill.",
">\n\nI hear ya. I never claimed it would be easy, or even possible. Just my ideal.",
">\n\nFor sure, I totally get it. \nAnd cheers, thanks for indulging me. I definitely struggle to balance ideals vs pragmatic actions, especially when the systemic issues are so broad and underpin all of it. I have ideas, but I worry we will never have a government socialist leaning enough to address the core problems of wealth inequality, violent ideologies, police oppression, and a lack of social safety nets and actual community identity in this country. It’s hard not to be pessimistic but damn this road is dark, and the biggest sign to me is that attempting to fix one symptom risks greatly exacerbating others.",
">\n\nGood. No one here wants every insecure loser carrying around a gun.."
] |
Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story. | [] |
>
Police in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.
The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday. | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story."
] |
>
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)
Police in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.
Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.
Police in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5 | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday."
] |
>
You didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...
Don't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.
Bottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.
I really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....
Either ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.) | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5"
] |
>
So much for free speech.
What is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?
No one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)"
] |
>
The key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols. | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions"
] |
>
The key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.
The dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.
James Lindsay told me so. | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols."
] |
>
Varg Vikernes
Arson of churches
On 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. The cover of Burzum's EP Aske ("ashes") is a photograph of the destroyed church. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992. Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo.
^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5) | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.",
">\n\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.\n\nThe dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.\nJames Lindsay told me so."
] |
>
Indeed, Finland is a fucking disgusting place in some areas, like this. Fucking "blasphemy", in 2023. | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.",
">\n\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.\n\nThe dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.\nJames Lindsay told me so.",
">\n\nVarg Vikernes \nArson of churches \n\nOn 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. The cover of Burzum's EP Aske (\"ashes\") is a photograph of the destroyed church. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992. Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo.\n\n^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)"
] |
>
So, they're kind of saying their government and their police that keep the idea of peace law and order are more accepting of the idea that religious zealots and cultists are to be appeased than the idea that people can speak freely and do with their own reading material what they want unless they offend the crazy believers of religion in their society who will then riot and cause real harm to people and damage to another's property?
I guess they think it is more sensible and morally right (or at least easier/cheaper) to put 1 person who really didn't do anything to harm another in jail than 100's or more crazed rioters who beat down people and burn an entire neighborhood in the name of sky Daddy religion, right? | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.",
">\n\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.\n\nThe dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.\nJames Lindsay told me so.",
">\n\nVarg Vikernes \nArson of churches \n\nOn 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. The cover of Burzum's EP Aske (\"ashes\") is a photograph of the destroyed church. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992. Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo.\n\n^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)",
">\n\nIndeed, Finland is a fucking disgusting place in some areas, like this. Fucking \"blasphemy\", in 2023."
] |
>
False dichotomy.
You might get fined for burning a Koran in public. Beating people or burning down an entire neighborhood would lead to a lengthy prison sentence.
I even don't know how one could get a prison sentence by violating the law in question. Perhaps barging into a funeral and pissing on the coffin would do. | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.",
">\n\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.\n\nThe dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.\nJames Lindsay told me so.",
">\n\nVarg Vikernes \nArson of churches \n\nOn 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. The cover of Burzum's EP Aske (\"ashes\") is a photograph of the destroyed church. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992. Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo.\n\n^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)",
">\n\nIndeed, Finland is a fucking disgusting place in some areas, like this. Fucking \"blasphemy\", in 2023.",
">\n\nSo, they're kind of saying their government and their police that keep the idea of peace law and order are more accepting of the idea that religious zealots and cultists are to be appeased than the idea that people can speak freely and do with their own reading material what they want unless they offend the crazy believers of religion in their society who will then riot and cause real harm to people and damage to another's property?\nI guess they think it is more sensible and morally right (or at least easier/cheaper) to put 1 person who really didn't do anything to harm another in jail than 100's or more crazed rioters who beat down people and burn an entire neighborhood in the name of sky Daddy religion, right?"
] |
>
Making a lesser, mere offense to another's beliefs an illegal act of any punishment just because another may commit acts of violence due to it is wrong. In essence, it is making a crime out of doing nothing wrong based on fear of what true wrong another may do.
Nonviolently offending other people is not a crime. If it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others. Therein lies the absurdity of merely offending people actually being a crime in any way, shape or form. | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.",
">\n\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.\n\nThe dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.\nJames Lindsay told me so.",
">\n\nVarg Vikernes \nArson of churches \n\nOn 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. The cover of Burzum's EP Aske (\"ashes\") is a photograph of the destroyed church. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992. Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo.\n\n^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)",
">\n\nIndeed, Finland is a fucking disgusting place in some areas, like this. Fucking \"blasphemy\", in 2023.",
">\n\nSo, they're kind of saying their government and their police that keep the idea of peace law and order are more accepting of the idea that religious zealots and cultists are to be appeased than the idea that people can speak freely and do with their own reading material what they want unless they offend the crazy believers of religion in their society who will then riot and cause real harm to people and damage to another's property?\nI guess they think it is more sensible and morally right (or at least easier/cheaper) to put 1 person who really didn't do anything to harm another in jail than 100's or more crazed rioters who beat down people and burn an entire neighborhood in the name of sky Daddy religion, right?",
">\n\nFalse dichotomy.\nYou might get fined for burning a Koran in public. Beating people or burning down an entire neighborhood would lead to a lengthy prison sentence.\nI even don't know how one could get a prison sentence by violating the law in question. Perhaps barging into a funeral and pissing on the coffin would do."
] |
>
The moral ground of the religious peace law is in the constitutional freedom of religion, not some fear of violence.
Nonviolently offending other people is not a crime.
That depends on the law, doesn't it?
If it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others.
There are other kinds of offensive behavior considered illegal in Finland. Defamation is one example. You can get fined for that too. | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.",
">\n\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.\n\nThe dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.\nJames Lindsay told me so.",
">\n\nVarg Vikernes \nArson of churches \n\nOn 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. The cover of Burzum's EP Aske (\"ashes\") is a photograph of the destroyed church. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992. Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo.\n\n^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)",
">\n\nIndeed, Finland is a fucking disgusting place in some areas, like this. Fucking \"blasphemy\", in 2023.",
">\n\nSo, they're kind of saying their government and their police that keep the idea of peace law and order are more accepting of the idea that religious zealots and cultists are to be appeased than the idea that people can speak freely and do with their own reading material what they want unless they offend the crazy believers of religion in their society who will then riot and cause real harm to people and damage to another's property?\nI guess they think it is more sensible and morally right (or at least easier/cheaper) to put 1 person who really didn't do anything to harm another in jail than 100's or more crazed rioters who beat down people and burn an entire neighborhood in the name of sky Daddy religion, right?",
">\n\nFalse dichotomy.\nYou might get fined for burning a Koran in public. Beating people or burning down an entire neighborhood would lead to a lengthy prison sentence.\nI even don't know how one could get a prison sentence by violating the law in question. Perhaps barging into a funeral and pissing on the coffin would do.",
">\n\nMaking a lesser, mere offense to another's beliefs an illegal act of any punishment just because another may commit acts of violence due to it is wrong. In essence, it is making a crime out of doing nothing wrong based on fear of what true wrong another may do.\nNonviolently offending other people is not a crime. If it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others. Therein lies the absurdity of merely offending people actually being a crime in any way, shape or form."
] |
>
I'd rather have Free Speech Sweden in NATO than Iran-kiye. | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.",
">\n\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.\n\nThe dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.\nJames Lindsay told me so.",
">\n\nVarg Vikernes \nArson of churches \n\nOn 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. The cover of Burzum's EP Aske (\"ashes\") is a photograph of the destroyed church. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992. Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo.\n\n^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)",
">\n\nIndeed, Finland is a fucking disgusting place in some areas, like this. Fucking \"blasphemy\", in 2023.",
">\n\nSo, they're kind of saying their government and their police that keep the idea of peace law and order are more accepting of the idea that religious zealots and cultists are to be appeased than the idea that people can speak freely and do with their own reading material what they want unless they offend the crazy believers of religion in their society who will then riot and cause real harm to people and damage to another's property?\nI guess they think it is more sensible and morally right (or at least easier/cheaper) to put 1 person who really didn't do anything to harm another in jail than 100's or more crazed rioters who beat down people and burn an entire neighborhood in the name of sky Daddy religion, right?",
">\n\nFalse dichotomy.\nYou might get fined for burning a Koran in public. Beating people or burning down an entire neighborhood would lead to a lengthy prison sentence.\nI even don't know how one could get a prison sentence by violating the law in question. Perhaps barging into a funeral and pissing on the coffin would do.",
">\n\nMaking a lesser, mere offense to another's beliefs an illegal act of any punishment just because another may commit acts of violence due to it is wrong. In essence, it is making a crime out of doing nothing wrong based on fear of what true wrong another may do.\nNonviolently offending other people is not a crime. If it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others. Therein lies the absurdity of merely offending people actually being a crime in any way, shape or form.",
">\n\nThe moral ground of the religious peace law is in the constitutional freedom of religion, not some fear of violence.\n\nNonviolently offending other people is not a crime.\n\nThat depends on the law, doesn't it?\n\nIf it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others.\n\nThere are other kinds of offensive behavior considered illegal in Finland. Defamation is one example. You can get fined for that too."
] |
>
What does a nation's speech laws have to do with their value in a defensive military alliance? | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.",
">\n\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.\n\nThe dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.\nJames Lindsay told me so.",
">\n\nVarg Vikernes \nArson of churches \n\nOn 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. The cover of Burzum's EP Aske (\"ashes\") is a photograph of the destroyed church. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992. Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo.\n\n^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)",
">\n\nIndeed, Finland is a fucking disgusting place in some areas, like this. Fucking \"blasphemy\", in 2023.",
">\n\nSo, they're kind of saying their government and their police that keep the idea of peace law and order are more accepting of the idea that religious zealots and cultists are to be appeased than the idea that people can speak freely and do with their own reading material what they want unless they offend the crazy believers of religion in their society who will then riot and cause real harm to people and damage to another's property?\nI guess they think it is more sensible and morally right (or at least easier/cheaper) to put 1 person who really didn't do anything to harm another in jail than 100's or more crazed rioters who beat down people and burn an entire neighborhood in the name of sky Daddy religion, right?",
">\n\nFalse dichotomy.\nYou might get fined for burning a Koran in public. Beating people or burning down an entire neighborhood would lead to a lengthy prison sentence.\nI even don't know how one could get a prison sentence by violating the law in question. Perhaps barging into a funeral and pissing on the coffin would do.",
">\n\nMaking a lesser, mere offense to another's beliefs an illegal act of any punishment just because another may commit acts of violence due to it is wrong. In essence, it is making a crime out of doing nothing wrong based on fear of what true wrong another may do.\nNonviolently offending other people is not a crime. If it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others. Therein lies the absurdity of merely offending people actually being a crime in any way, shape or form.",
">\n\nThe moral ground of the religious peace law is in the constitutional freedom of religion, not some fear of violence.\n\nNonviolently offending other people is not a crime.\n\nThat depends on the law, doesn't it?\n\nIf it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others.\n\nThere are other kinds of offensive behavior considered illegal in Finland. Defamation is one example. You can get fined for that too.",
">\n\nI'd rather have Free Speech Sweden in NATO than Iran-kiye."
] |
>
The same thing as burning a book of fairy tales does. | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.",
">\n\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.\n\nThe dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.\nJames Lindsay told me so.",
">\n\nVarg Vikernes \nArson of churches \n\nOn 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. The cover of Burzum's EP Aske (\"ashes\") is a photograph of the destroyed church. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992. Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo.\n\n^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)",
">\n\nIndeed, Finland is a fucking disgusting place in some areas, like this. Fucking \"blasphemy\", in 2023.",
">\n\nSo, they're kind of saying their government and their police that keep the idea of peace law and order are more accepting of the idea that religious zealots and cultists are to be appeased than the idea that people can speak freely and do with their own reading material what they want unless they offend the crazy believers of religion in their society who will then riot and cause real harm to people and damage to another's property?\nI guess they think it is more sensible and morally right (or at least easier/cheaper) to put 1 person who really didn't do anything to harm another in jail than 100's or more crazed rioters who beat down people and burn an entire neighborhood in the name of sky Daddy religion, right?",
">\n\nFalse dichotomy.\nYou might get fined for burning a Koran in public. Beating people or burning down an entire neighborhood would lead to a lengthy prison sentence.\nI even don't know how one could get a prison sentence by violating the law in question. Perhaps barging into a funeral and pissing on the coffin would do.",
">\n\nMaking a lesser, mere offense to another's beliefs an illegal act of any punishment just because another may commit acts of violence due to it is wrong. In essence, it is making a crime out of doing nothing wrong based on fear of what true wrong another may do.\nNonviolently offending other people is not a crime. If it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others. Therein lies the absurdity of merely offending people actually being a crime in any way, shape or form.",
">\n\nThe moral ground of the religious peace law is in the constitutional freedom of religion, not some fear of violence.\n\nNonviolently offending other people is not a crime.\n\nThat depends on the law, doesn't it?\n\nIf it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others.\n\nThere are other kinds of offensive behavior considered illegal in Finland. Defamation is one example. You can get fined for that too.",
">\n\nI'd rather have Free Speech Sweden in NATO than Iran-kiye.",
">\n\nWhat does a nation's speech laws have to do with their value in a defensive military alliance?"
] |
> | [
"Finland and Sweden had similar Blasphemy laws but Sweden abolished them in the 70s. I think a lot of countries have a similar story.",
">\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board. Finnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT.\nThe public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 54%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nPolice in Finland would not allow a public burning of the Koran, as has occurred recently in Sweden and Denmark, according to the National Police Board.\nFinnish law stipulates that violating religious peace is a punishable offence, the police board said in a statement to the Finnish News Agency STT. The public burning or other desecration of a book held sacred by a religious community would be likely to meet the hallmarks of this crime, it said on Monday.\nPolice in these countries have allowed the events to go ahead, saying that the actions did not violate any laws.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: law^#1 Police^#2 change^#3 Finnish^#4 burned^#5",
">\n\nYou didn't say what was illegal either before you replying about anything but yet, you still imply that somehow burning a book equates to justifiable incarceration. I put no words in your mouth other than you implied you must have agreed with doing to a book burner...\nDon't go off topic either about anything people might do to piss people off instead of the specific act of simply burning a specific book in one's own possession in any area it is legal to burn anything else similar to it in physical composition.\nBottom line is, by what you write, that one can easily assume you must think it better to take away simple freedoms of speech and forms of nonviolent protest by an individual than to risk individuals of some certain group taking offense to it because they might actually do something to harm other people who disagree with them irregardless of if their group's retaliatory actions are themselves legal or illegal.\nI really Don't care what else you think on the matter, reply if you must if I have offended your sense of right and wrong so much that much. Perhaps you would like to riot or get a law passed that I can't express such things because you or someone else might be goaded into acts of actually disturbing the peace over what I voiced I thought about a topic....\nEither ways, I'm off to enjoy dinner (or maybe burn a few religious texts in my town's public park BBQ pit area. Perhaps you might want to call the cops on me or get a law passed in my area against me doing it so I don't offend you there in Finland, right? I mean, you ask if I am Finnish... same goes for you... are you a a Finn living in Finland right now? Do you have any more room to speak than me or are you just trying to shut up a voice you don't like? Lol, you're a real joke, buddy.)",
">\n\nSo much for free speech.\nWhat is this, China, North Korea, Iran, Russia?\nNo one should go to prison for insulting people, cults, and religions",
">\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.",
">\n\n\nThe key question is how they react to similar desecration of Christian symbols.\n\nThe dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression? Well, then it's just speaking truth to power. In fact, not desecrating Christian symbols is to passively embrace and uphold the dominant cisheteronormative patriarchal system of oppression.\nJames Lindsay told me so.",
">\n\nVarg Vikernes \nArson of churches \n\nOn 6 June 1992, the Fantoft Stave Church, dating from the 12th century and considered architecturally significant, was burned to the ground by arson. The cover of Burzum's EP Aske (\"ashes\") is a photograph of the destroyed church. By January 1993, arson attacks had occurred on at least seven other major stave churches, including one on Christmas Eve of 1992. Vikernes was found guilty of several of these cases: the arson and attempted arson of Åsane Church and Storetveit Church in Bergen, the arson of Skjold Church in Vindafjord, and the arson of Holmenkollen Chapel in Oslo.\n\n^([ )^(F.A.Q)^( | )^(Opt Out)^( | )^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)^( | )^(GitHub)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)",
">\n\nIndeed, Finland is a fucking disgusting place in some areas, like this. Fucking \"blasphemy\", in 2023.",
">\n\nSo, they're kind of saying their government and their police that keep the idea of peace law and order are more accepting of the idea that religious zealots and cultists are to be appeased than the idea that people can speak freely and do with their own reading material what they want unless they offend the crazy believers of religion in their society who will then riot and cause real harm to people and damage to another's property?\nI guess they think it is more sensible and morally right (or at least easier/cheaper) to put 1 person who really didn't do anything to harm another in jail than 100's or more crazed rioters who beat down people and burn an entire neighborhood in the name of sky Daddy religion, right?",
">\n\nFalse dichotomy.\nYou might get fined for burning a Koran in public. Beating people or burning down an entire neighborhood would lead to a lengthy prison sentence.\nI even don't know how one could get a prison sentence by violating the law in question. Perhaps barging into a funeral and pissing on the coffin would do.",
">\n\nMaking a lesser, mere offense to another's beliefs an illegal act of any punishment just because another may commit acts of violence due to it is wrong. In essence, it is making a crime out of doing nothing wrong based on fear of what true wrong another may do.\nNonviolently offending other people is not a crime. If it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others. Therein lies the absurdity of merely offending people actually being a crime in any way, shape or form.",
">\n\nThe moral ground of the religious peace law is in the constitutional freedom of religion, not some fear of violence.\n\nNonviolently offending other people is not a crime.\n\nThat depends on the law, doesn't it?\n\nIf it is made a crime for one offense, it must be made a crime for all things that offend others.\n\nThere are other kinds of offensive behavior considered illegal in Finland. Defamation is one example. You can get fined for that too.",
">\n\nI'd rather have Free Speech Sweden in NATO than Iran-kiye.",
">\n\nWhat does a nation's speech laws have to do with their value in a defensive military alliance?",
">\n\nThe same thing as burning a book of fairy tales does."
] |
They’ll never know | [] |
>
The actor in a netflix high school movie: | [
"They’ll never know"
] |
>
These PEDs are getting out of hand! | [
"They’ll never know",
">\n\nThe actor in a netflix high school movie:"
] |
> | [
"They’ll never know",
">\n\nThe actor in a netflix high school movie:",
">\n\nThese PEDs are getting out of hand!"
] |
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans. | [] |
> | [
"This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans."
] |
A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”
Uh...Okay... | [] |
>
I’m sure it was a misunderstanding.
The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate
Oh, okay, well, um… | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay..."
] |
>
Both probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…"
] |
>
So now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby."
] |
>
Coming this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life."
] |
>
Maga Baby | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby."
] |
>
A couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.
The pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.
It emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.
The matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.
She said: "These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.
"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police."
Horrible parents.
Edit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.
A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: "The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation."
The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby"
] |
>
Did anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents? | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant."
] |
>
This is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?"
] |
>
Are we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?” | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that."
] |
>
Well, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do? | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”"
] |
>
Overhead luggage? | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?"
] |
>
Travel smarter not harder | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?"
] |
>
I wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?
Also, don't babies fly free?! | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder"
] |
>
“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”
Definitely an abduction. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!"
] |
>
Definitely an abduction
That's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise
A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: "The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation."
So, no abduction, but the "no further investigation" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction."
] |
>
Maybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant."
] |
>
That baby? Francine Smith | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child."
] |
>
I was coming here to make the joke. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith"
] |
>
You snooze, you lose! | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke."
] |
>
That baby should not go back to them. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!"
] |
>
I’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them."
] |
>
Maybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket"
] |
>
I mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket"
] |
>
this is straight out of American Dad | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story."
] |
>
Kids name was Kevin... and he protected his house from robbers? | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story.",
">\n\nthis is straight out of American Dad"
] |
>
"Did you grab the baby?"
"I thought you had the baby!" | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story.",
">\n\nthis is straight out of American Dad",
">\n\nKids name was Kevin... and he protected his house from robbers?"
] |
>
“No ticket.” - Silent Bob | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story.",
">\n\nthis is straight out of American Dad",
">\n\nKids name was Kevin... and he protected his house from robbers?",
">\n\n\"Did you grab the baby?\" \n\"I thought you had the baby!\""
] |
>
Maybe they were redditors who know how much people hate babies on flights. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story.",
">\n\nthis is straight out of American Dad",
">\n\nKids name was Kevin... and he protected his house from robbers?",
">\n\n\"Did you grab the baby?\" \n\"I thought you had the baby!\"",
">\n\n“No ticket.” - Silent Bob"
] |
>
Of course they are ryan air passengers. That poor kid. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story.",
">\n\nthis is straight out of American Dad",
">\n\nKids name was Kevin... and he protected his house from robbers?",
">\n\n\"Did you grab the baby?\" \n\"I thought you had the baby!\"",
">\n\n“No ticket.” - Silent Bob",
">\n\nMaybe they were redditors who know how much people hate babies on flights."
] |
>
😂😂😂 Every hour on limited vacation days are important. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story.",
">\n\nthis is straight out of American Dad",
">\n\nKids name was Kevin... and he protected his house from robbers?",
">\n\n\"Did you grab the baby?\" \n\"I thought you had the baby!\"",
">\n\n“No ticket.” - Silent Bob",
">\n\nMaybe they were redditors who know how much people hate babies on flights.",
">\n\nOf course they are ryan air passengers. That poor kid."
] |
>
Why were they even allowed to board the flight? | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story.",
">\n\nthis is straight out of American Dad",
">\n\nKids name was Kevin... and he protected his house from robbers?",
">\n\n\"Did you grab the baby?\" \n\"I thought you had the baby!\"",
">\n\n“No ticket.” - Silent Bob",
">\n\nMaybe they were redditors who know how much people hate babies on flights.",
">\n\nOf course they are ryan air passengers. That poor kid.",
">\n\n😂😂😂 Every hour on limited vacation days are important."
] |
>
Presumably they had tickets unlike that third person. | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story.",
">\n\nthis is straight out of American Dad",
">\n\nKids name was Kevin... and he protected his house from robbers?",
">\n\n\"Did you grab the baby?\" \n\"I thought you had the baby!\"",
">\n\n“No ticket.” - Silent Bob",
">\n\nMaybe they were redditors who know how much people hate babies on flights.",
">\n\nOf course they are ryan air passengers. That poor kid.",
">\n\n😂😂😂 Every hour on limited vacation days are important.",
">\n\nWhy were they even allowed to board the flight?"
] |
>
I know you are joking, but abandoning your baby is illegal. I am not allowed to abandon my illegal drugs and go on my way | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story.",
">\n\nthis is straight out of American Dad",
">\n\nKids name was Kevin... and he protected his house from robbers?",
">\n\n\"Did you grab the baby?\" \n\"I thought you had the baby!\"",
">\n\n“No ticket.” - Silent Bob",
">\n\nMaybe they were redditors who know how much people hate babies on flights.",
">\n\nOf course they are ryan air passengers. That poor kid.",
">\n\n😂😂😂 Every hour on limited vacation days are important.",
">\n\nWhy were they even allowed to board the flight?",
">\n\nPresumably they had tickets unlike that third person."
] |
> | [
"A spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: “The baby was with the parents and there’s no further investigation.”\n\nUh...Okay...",
">\n\nI’m sure it was a misunderstanding. \n\nThe couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate\n\nOh, okay, well, um…",
">\n\nBoth probably thought the other had the baby... Or in their sleep deprived state forgot they had a baby.",
">\n\nSo now airport employees raise the stateless child who can never leave the airport where they learn the value of love and teach weary travelers valuable lessons about the true importance of life.",
">\n\nComing this summer...ROB SCHNEIDER IS...Airport Baby.",
">\n\nMaga Baby",
">\n\n\nA couple abandoned their baby at an airport check-in desk in Tel Aviv, Israel after arriving without a ticket for the child.\nThe pair, who have not been identified, were checking in for a Ryanair flight from Ben Gurion International Airport to Brussels, Belgium on Tuesday with the infant.\nIt emerged that the baby did not have a ticket, and the couple headed off to board the flight -- leaving their child behind on the airline check-in counter.\nThe matter was referred to police, a spokeswoman for Ryanair told CNN in an email.\nShe said: \"These passengers traveling from Tel Aviv to Brussels (31 Jan) presented at check-in without a booking for their infant. They then proceeded to security leaving the infant behind at check-in.\n\"The check-in agent at Ben Gurion Airport contacted Airport Security, who retrieved these passengers, and this is now a matter for local police.\"\n\nHorrible parents.\nEdit: Adding comment by Israeli Police.\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nThe police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nDid anyone check whether they were actually the baby's parents?",
">\n\nThis is all I was thinking, did they just snatch someone else's baby, it seems like they abandoned the baby too easily like it wasn't their own. The baby is going to be in for a rough upbringing with cold heartless parents like that.",
">\n\nAre we supposed to be saying “thank God they were reunited with that baby?”",
">\n\nWell, the baby didn't have a ticket, so what are ya gunna do?",
">\n\nOverhead luggage?",
">\n\nTravel smarter not harder",
">\n\nI wonder if it was actually their baby? Like what if they just swiped some baby and tried to flee the country?\nAlso, don't babies fly free?!",
">\n\n\n“A couple and an infant with Belgian passports arrived for a flight at Terminal 1 without a ticket for the baby. The couple also arrived late for the flight, once the check-in for the flight was closed. The couple left the infant seat with the baby and ran toward the security checks at Terminal 1 in an attempt to reach the boarding gate for the flight.”\n\nDefinitely an abduction.",
">\n\n\nDefinitely an abduction\n\nThat's what I thought at first, but it seems the Israeli police said otherwise\n\nA spokesman for Israel Police told CNN in a phone call that the matter appeared to have been resolved by the time police arrived on the scene. He said: \"The baby was with the parents and there's no further investigation.\"\n\nSo, no abduction, but the \"no further investigation\" part is just BS. The police should charge the parents with negligence and endangering an infant.",
">\n\nMaybe not, but someone else should definitely be responsible for raising this child.",
">\n\nThat baby? Francine Smith",
">\n\nI was coming here to make the joke.",
">\n\nYou snooze, you lose!",
">\n\nThat baby should not go back to them.",
">\n\nI’m glad the headline mentioned the baby didn’t have a ticket",
">\n\nMaybe that little prick should have bought his own ticket",
">\n\nI mean, if the baby had a ticket and they ditched him, that would be a completely different story.",
">\n\nthis is straight out of American Dad",
">\n\nKids name was Kevin... and he protected his house from robbers?",
">\n\n\"Did you grab the baby?\" \n\"I thought you had the baby!\"",
">\n\n“No ticket.” - Silent Bob",
">\n\nMaybe they were redditors who know how much people hate babies on flights.",
">\n\nOf course they are ryan air passengers. That poor kid.",
">\n\n😂😂😂 Every hour on limited vacation days are important.",
">\n\nWhy were they even allowed to board the flight?",
">\n\nPresumably they had tickets unlike that third person.",
">\n\nI know you are joking, but abandoning your baby is illegal. I am not allowed to abandon my illegal drugs and go on my way"
] |
Oh good idea, make them use apps you aren't aware of | [] |
>
For more information, you can follow the official twitter and instagram accounts of Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic Ayatollah Ali Khamanei @khamanei_ir
I wish this was a joke. | [
"Oh good idea, make them use apps you aren't aware of"
] |
>
You can also blame your hardball tactic in trying to squash protests. | [
"Oh good idea, make them use apps you aren't aware of",
">\n\nFor more information, you can follow the official twitter and instagram accounts of Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic Ayatollah Ali Khamanei @khamanei_ir\nI wish this was a joke."
] |
> | [
"Oh good idea, make them use apps you aren't aware of",
">\n\nFor more information, you can follow the official twitter and instagram accounts of Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic Ayatollah Ali Khamanei @khamanei_ir\nI wish this was a joke.",
">\n\nYou can also blame your hardball tactic in trying to squash protests."
] |
Yes that pos is a racist.... | [] |
>
Unfortunately, as long as he has the support of the Cubans, it will be very difficult to dislodge him from his leadership position. | [
"Yes that pos is a racist...."
] |
>
Misguided Cubans are mainly in Florida ....because Floor A Duh is not a microcosm of the united states .... No Governor Senator has never been President and this racist who wears ill fitting suits will never reach that plateau... He can't dial back his racism... FHAnd FL. | [
"Yes that pos is a racist....",
">\n\nUnfortunately, as long as he has the support of the Cubans, it will be very difficult to dislodge him from his leadership position."
] |
>
I don’t understand the second half. Are you trying to say no governor or senator has ever gone on to become president? | [
"Yes that pos is a racist....",
">\n\nUnfortunately, as long as he has the support of the Cubans, it will be very difficult to dislodge him from his leadership position.",
">\n\nMisguided Cubans are mainly in Florida ....because Floor A Duh is not a microcosm of the united states .... No Governor Senator has never been President and this racist who wears ill fitting suits will never reach that plateau... He can't dial back his racism... FHAnd FL."
] |
>
I think they meant "of Florida" | [
"Yes that pos is a racist....",
">\n\nUnfortunately, as long as he has the support of the Cubans, it will be very difficult to dislodge him from his leadership position.",
">\n\nMisguided Cubans are mainly in Florida ....because Floor A Duh is not a microcosm of the united states .... No Governor Senator has never been President and this racist who wears ill fitting suits will never reach that plateau... He can't dial back his racism... FHAnd FL.",
">\n\nI don’t understand the second half. Are you trying to say no governor or senator has ever gone on to become president?"
] |
>
From the story:
On the first day of Black History Month, Gov. Ron DeSantis was the focus when Miami-Dade County’s Black Affairs Advisory Board convened in downtown Miami Wednesday.
“Our governor is racist,” said Stephen Hunter Johnson, a Miami lawyer and one of two dozen volunteer board members. “He is using Black America, and Black Floridians, as a political football.”
The board has no formal power in Miami-Dade government but serves as the county’s unofficial sounding board for issues and challenges facing Black residents.
Items discussed at Wednesday’s meeting included the use of specialized police units in Miami-Dade similar to the one responsible for the death of Tyre Nichols in Memphis, and what position the board should take on bail reform.
With more than a dozen members attending, the February meeting offered a cross section of the mood of Black leaders from Miami-Dade to a pair of controversies sparked by DeSantis as he prepares for a possible presidential run in 2024.
The meeting began with a discussion on the DeSantis administration’s blocking of an optional African American Studies high-school course over inclusion of readings on the Black Lives Matter political movement and on the topic of “Black Queer Theory.”
Also on the Miami-Dade board’s docket: the governor’s proposal to halt state funding of diversity, equity and inclusion programming at state universities.
“If you want to start playing with taking our history away from us, then give us back our tax dollars,” said Phyllis Sloan-Simpkins, a retired Miami-Dade firefighter. “Because our tax dollars are supposed to help educate our children.”
You can read the full story here. | [
"Yes that pos is a racist....",
">\n\nUnfortunately, as long as he has the support of the Cubans, it will be very difficult to dislodge him from his leadership position.",
">\n\nMisguided Cubans are mainly in Florida ....because Floor A Duh is not a microcosm of the united states .... No Governor Senator has never been President and this racist who wears ill fitting suits will never reach that plateau... He can't dial back his racism... FHAnd FL.",
">\n\nI don’t understand the second half. Are you trying to say no governor or senator has ever gone on to become president?",
">\n\nI think they meant \"of Florida\""
] |
>
You're allowed to add "piece of shit" when you call anyone racist. In fact, it should be a rule.
"Our governor is a racist piece of shit." There. That's better. True, too. | [
"Yes that pos is a racist....",
">\n\nUnfortunately, as long as he has the support of the Cubans, it will be very difficult to dislodge him from his leadership position.",
">\n\nMisguided Cubans are mainly in Florida ....because Floor A Duh is not a microcosm of the united states .... No Governor Senator has never been President and this racist who wears ill fitting suits will never reach that plateau... He can't dial back his racism... FHAnd FL.",
">\n\nI don’t understand the second half. Are you trying to say no governor or senator has ever gone on to become president?",
">\n\nI think they meant \"of Florida\"",
">\n\nFrom the story:\n\nOn the first day of Black History Month, Gov. Ron DeSantis was the focus when Miami-Dade County’s Black Affairs Advisory Board convened in downtown Miami Wednesday. \n“Our governor is racist,” said Stephen Hunter Johnson, a Miami lawyer and one of two dozen volunteer board members. “He is using Black America, and Black Floridians, as a political football.” \nThe board has no formal power in Miami-Dade government but serves as the county’s unofficial sounding board for issues and challenges facing Black residents. \nItems discussed at Wednesday’s meeting included the use of specialized police units in Miami-Dade similar to the one responsible for the death of Tyre Nichols in Memphis, and what position the board should take on bail reform. \nWith more than a dozen members attending, the February meeting offered a cross section of the mood of Black leaders from Miami-Dade to a pair of controversies sparked by DeSantis as he prepares for a possible presidential run in 2024. \nThe meeting began with a discussion on the DeSantis administration’s blocking of an optional African American Studies high-school course over inclusion of readings on the Black Lives Matter political movement and on the topic of “Black Queer Theory.” \nAlso on the Miami-Dade board’s docket: the governor’s proposal to halt state funding of diversity, equity and inclusion programming at state universities. \n“If you want to start playing with taking our history away from us, then give us back our tax dollars,” said Phyllis Sloan-Simpkins, a retired Miami-Dade firefighter. “Because our tax dollars are supposed to help educate our children.”\n\nYou can read the full story here."
] |
>
Give ‘em hell! | [
"Yes that pos is a racist....",
">\n\nUnfortunately, as long as he has the support of the Cubans, it will be very difficult to dislodge him from his leadership position.",
">\n\nMisguided Cubans are mainly in Florida ....because Floor A Duh is not a microcosm of the united states .... No Governor Senator has never been President and this racist who wears ill fitting suits will never reach that plateau... He can't dial back his racism... FHAnd FL.",
">\n\nI don’t understand the second half. Are you trying to say no governor or senator has ever gone on to become president?",
">\n\nI think they meant \"of Florida\"",
">\n\nFrom the story:\n\nOn the first day of Black History Month, Gov. Ron DeSantis was the focus when Miami-Dade County’s Black Affairs Advisory Board convened in downtown Miami Wednesday. \n“Our governor is racist,” said Stephen Hunter Johnson, a Miami lawyer and one of two dozen volunteer board members. “He is using Black America, and Black Floridians, as a political football.” \nThe board has no formal power in Miami-Dade government but serves as the county’s unofficial sounding board for issues and challenges facing Black residents. \nItems discussed at Wednesday’s meeting included the use of specialized police units in Miami-Dade similar to the one responsible for the death of Tyre Nichols in Memphis, and what position the board should take on bail reform. \nWith more than a dozen members attending, the February meeting offered a cross section of the mood of Black leaders from Miami-Dade to a pair of controversies sparked by DeSantis as he prepares for a possible presidential run in 2024. \nThe meeting began with a discussion on the DeSantis administration’s blocking of an optional African American Studies high-school course over inclusion of readings on the Black Lives Matter political movement and on the topic of “Black Queer Theory.” \nAlso on the Miami-Dade board’s docket: the governor’s proposal to halt state funding of diversity, equity and inclusion programming at state universities. \n“If you want to start playing with taking our history away from us, then give us back our tax dollars,” said Phyllis Sloan-Simpkins, a retired Miami-Dade firefighter. “Because our tax dollars are supposed to help educate our children.”\n\nYou can read the full story here.",
">\n\nYou're allowed to add \"piece of shit\" when you call anyone racist. In fact, it should be a rule.\n\"Our governor is a racist piece of shit.\" There. That's better. True, too."
] |
>
He has spoken at racist conferences. He’s accepted a contribution and would not return it from someone who referred to the former president of the United States as a Muslim n-i-g-g-e-r. When asked to return that money, he said no. He’s using that money to now fund negative ads.
Now, I’m not calling Mr. Desantis a racist. I’m simply saying the racists believe he’s a racist. - Andrew Gillum | [
"Yes that pos is a racist....",
">\n\nUnfortunately, as long as he has the support of the Cubans, it will be very difficult to dislodge him from his leadership position.",
">\n\nMisguided Cubans are mainly in Florida ....because Floor A Duh is not a microcosm of the united states .... No Governor Senator has never been President and this racist who wears ill fitting suits will never reach that plateau... He can't dial back his racism... FHAnd FL.",
">\n\nI don’t understand the second half. Are you trying to say no governor or senator has ever gone on to become president?",
">\n\nI think they meant \"of Florida\"",
">\n\nFrom the story:\n\nOn the first day of Black History Month, Gov. Ron DeSantis was the focus when Miami-Dade County’s Black Affairs Advisory Board convened in downtown Miami Wednesday. \n“Our governor is racist,” said Stephen Hunter Johnson, a Miami lawyer and one of two dozen volunteer board members. “He is using Black America, and Black Floridians, as a political football.” \nThe board has no formal power in Miami-Dade government but serves as the county’s unofficial sounding board for issues and challenges facing Black residents. \nItems discussed at Wednesday’s meeting included the use of specialized police units in Miami-Dade similar to the one responsible for the death of Tyre Nichols in Memphis, and what position the board should take on bail reform. \nWith more than a dozen members attending, the February meeting offered a cross section of the mood of Black leaders from Miami-Dade to a pair of controversies sparked by DeSantis as he prepares for a possible presidential run in 2024. \nThe meeting began with a discussion on the DeSantis administration’s blocking of an optional African American Studies high-school course over inclusion of readings on the Black Lives Matter political movement and on the topic of “Black Queer Theory.” \nAlso on the Miami-Dade board’s docket: the governor’s proposal to halt state funding of diversity, equity and inclusion programming at state universities. \n“If you want to start playing with taking our history away from us, then give us back our tax dollars,” said Phyllis Sloan-Simpkins, a retired Miami-Dade firefighter. “Because our tax dollars are supposed to help educate our children.”\n\nYou can read the full story here.",
">\n\nYou're allowed to add \"piece of shit\" when you call anyone racist. In fact, it should be a rule.\n\"Our governor is a racist piece of shit.\" There. That's better. True, too.",
">\n\nGive ‘em hell!"
] |
> | [
"Yes that pos is a racist....",
">\n\nUnfortunately, as long as he has the support of the Cubans, it will be very difficult to dislodge him from his leadership position.",
">\n\nMisguided Cubans are mainly in Florida ....because Floor A Duh is not a microcosm of the united states .... No Governor Senator has never been President and this racist who wears ill fitting suits will never reach that plateau... He can't dial back his racism... FHAnd FL.",
">\n\nI don’t understand the second half. Are you trying to say no governor or senator has ever gone on to become president?",
">\n\nI think they meant \"of Florida\"",
">\n\nFrom the story:\n\nOn the first day of Black History Month, Gov. Ron DeSantis was the focus when Miami-Dade County’s Black Affairs Advisory Board convened in downtown Miami Wednesday. \n“Our governor is racist,” said Stephen Hunter Johnson, a Miami lawyer and one of two dozen volunteer board members. “He is using Black America, and Black Floridians, as a political football.” \nThe board has no formal power in Miami-Dade government but serves as the county’s unofficial sounding board for issues and challenges facing Black residents. \nItems discussed at Wednesday’s meeting included the use of specialized police units in Miami-Dade similar to the one responsible for the death of Tyre Nichols in Memphis, and what position the board should take on bail reform. \nWith more than a dozen members attending, the February meeting offered a cross section of the mood of Black leaders from Miami-Dade to a pair of controversies sparked by DeSantis as he prepares for a possible presidential run in 2024. \nThe meeting began with a discussion on the DeSantis administration’s blocking of an optional African American Studies high-school course over inclusion of readings on the Black Lives Matter political movement and on the topic of “Black Queer Theory.” \nAlso on the Miami-Dade board’s docket: the governor’s proposal to halt state funding of diversity, equity and inclusion programming at state universities. \n“If you want to start playing with taking our history away from us, then give us back our tax dollars,” said Phyllis Sloan-Simpkins, a retired Miami-Dade firefighter. “Because our tax dollars are supposed to help educate our children.”\n\nYou can read the full story here.",
">\n\nYou're allowed to add \"piece of shit\" when you call anyone racist. In fact, it should be a rule.\n\"Our governor is a racist piece of shit.\" There. That's better. True, too.",
">\n\nGive ‘em hell!",
">\n\n\nHe has spoken at racist conferences. He’s accepted a contribution and would not return it from someone who referred to the former president of the United States as a Muslim n-i-g-g-e-r. When asked to return that money, he said no. He’s using that money to now fund negative ads.\nNow, I’m not calling Mr. Desantis a racist. I’m simply saying the racists believe he’s a racist. - Andrew Gillum"
] |
I want to do this with my QwerkyWriter and replace all the cherry blues with box jades xD | [] |
>
Yeah, i would go Jade or navy for the typewriter sound. | [
"I want to do this with my QwerkyWriter and replace all the cherry blues with box jades xD"
] |
> | [
"I want to do this with my QwerkyWriter and replace all the cherry blues with box jades xD",
">\n\nYeah, i would go Jade or navy for the typewriter sound."
] |
Because that's what it is | [] |
>
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 91%. (I'm a bot)
Australia should designate Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a terrorist organisation and be prepared to expel diplomats from the country, according to a new Senate inquiry report.
The majority report makes 12 recommendations backed by the Coalition and the Greens, including a call for the Australian government to "Take the necessary steps to formally categorise the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as an organisation involved in supporting and facilitating terrorism".
"The IRGC is a terrorist organisation and should be recognised as such," the committee report said.
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 report^#2 Australian^#3 government^#4 Iranian^#5 | [
"Because that's what it is"
] |
> | [
"Because that's what it is",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 91%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nAustralia should designate Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a terrorist organisation and be prepared to expel diplomats from the country, according to a new Senate inquiry report.\nThe majority report makes 12 recommendations backed by the Coalition and the Greens, including a call for the Australian government to \"Take the necessary steps to formally categorise the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as an organisation involved in supporting and facilitating terrorism\".\n\"The IRGC is a terrorist organisation and should be recognised as such,\" the committee report said.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Australia^#1 report^#2 Australian^#3 government^#4 Iranian^#5"
] |
North Atlantic is getting bigger lmao | [] |
>
Precursor to the Global Defense Initiative. | [
"North Atlantic is getting bigger lmao"
] |
>
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 70%. (I'm a bot)
The two leaders agreed that NATO and Japan need to communicate better with each other, and are considering having Japanese officials periodically participate in the North Atlantic Council and the NATO chiefs of defense meetings.
In the three national security documents approved by the Kishida Cabinet in December, NATO was named as one of the like-minded parties Japan wishes to deepen its relationship with on foreign affairs and defense.
Japan will dispatch officials from the Defense Ministry and other departments to NATO research facilities to learn about defense and science technology accumulated by NATO. Japan is particularly interested in hybrid operations that combine intelligence warfare with cyberspace activities.
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: NATO^#1 Kishida^#2 Japan^#3 defense^#4 cooperation^#5 | [
"North Atlantic is getting bigger lmao",
">\n\nPrecursor to the Global Defense Initiative."
] |
> | [
"North Atlantic is getting bigger lmao",
">\n\nPrecursor to the Global Defense Initiative.",
">\n\nThis is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 70%. (I'm a bot)\n\n\nThe two leaders agreed that NATO and Japan need to communicate better with each other, and are considering having Japanese officials periodically participate in the North Atlantic Council and the NATO chiefs of defense meetings.\nIn the three national security documents approved by the Kishida Cabinet in December, NATO was named as one of the like-minded parties Japan wishes to deepen its relationship with on foreign affairs and defense.\nJapan will dispatch officials from the Defense Ministry and other departments to NATO research facilities to learn about defense and science technology accumulated by NATO. Japan is particularly interested in hybrid operations that combine intelligence warfare with cyberspace activities.\n\n\nExtended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: NATO^#1 Kishida^#2 Japan^#3 defense^#4 cooperation^#5"
] |
Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win. | [] |
>
I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse. | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win."
] |
>
Trump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder. | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse."
] |
>
Will Santos be First Lady? | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder."
] |
>
First Kitara | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?"
] |
>
Bending more than water | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara"
] |
>
I mean I've been known to tell a lie or two in my time, but somehow I've never catalyzed a daisy chain of lies that resulted in my winning a seat in congress under a fake name while on the run from Brazilian authorities. | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara",
">\n\nBending more than water"
] |
>
The script writes itself. | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara",
">\n\nBending more than water",
">\n\nI mean I've been known to tell a lie or two in my time, but somehow I've never catalyzed a daisy chain of lies that resulted in my winning a seat in congress under a fake name while on the run from Brazilian authorities."
] |
>
Its the Republican way he'll fit right in | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara",
">\n\nBending more than water",
">\n\nI mean I've been known to tell a lie or two in my time, but somehow I've never catalyzed a daisy chain of lies that resulted in my winning a seat in congress under a fake name while on the run from Brazilian authorities.",
">\n\nThe script writes itself."
] |
>
And when all else fails he stares blankly like you’re speaking a different language. | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara",
">\n\nBending more than water",
">\n\nI mean I've been known to tell a lie or two in my time, but somehow I've never catalyzed a daisy chain of lies that resulted in my winning a seat in congress under a fake name while on the run from Brazilian authorities.",
">\n\nThe script writes itself.",
">\n\nIts the Republican way he'll fit right in"
] |
>
In other words, he’s a Republican. | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara",
">\n\nBending more than water",
">\n\nI mean I've been known to tell a lie or two in my time, but somehow I've never catalyzed a daisy chain of lies that resulted in my winning a seat in congress under a fake name while on the run from Brazilian authorities.",
">\n\nThe script writes itself.",
">\n\nIts the Republican way he'll fit right in",
">\n\nAnd when all else fails he stares blankly like you’re speaking a different language."
] |
>
He sounds like most of the 8 yo I have ever had in school when confronted with a problem. They would start to lie, then I would say in my very best teacher voice, “And don’t you dare lie to me!” Pretty much works every time. | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara",
">\n\nBending more than water",
">\n\nI mean I've been known to tell a lie or two in my time, but somehow I've never catalyzed a daisy chain of lies that resulted in my winning a seat in congress under a fake name while on the run from Brazilian authorities.",
">\n\nThe script writes itself.",
">\n\nIts the Republican way he'll fit right in",
">\n\nAnd when all else fails he stares blankly like you’re speaking a different language.",
">\n\nIn other words, he’s a Republican."
] |
>
Can we all agree a sweater over a button down (w/ tie) under a sport coat is shit look | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara",
">\n\nBending more than water",
">\n\nI mean I've been known to tell a lie or two in my time, but somehow I've never catalyzed a daisy chain of lies that resulted in my winning a seat in congress under a fake name while on the run from Brazilian authorities.",
">\n\nThe script writes itself.",
">\n\nIts the Republican way he'll fit right in",
">\n\nAnd when all else fails he stares blankly like you’re speaking a different language.",
">\n\nIn other words, he’s a Republican.",
">\n\nHe sounds like most of the 8 yo I have ever had in school when confronted with a problem. They would start to lie, then I would say in my very best teacher voice, “And don’t you dare lie to me!” Pretty much works every time."
] |
>
Santos is simply modeling after Donald Trump without the vicious attacks. | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara",
">\n\nBending more than water",
">\n\nI mean I've been known to tell a lie or two in my time, but somehow I've never catalyzed a daisy chain of lies that resulted in my winning a seat in congress under a fake name while on the run from Brazilian authorities.",
">\n\nThe script writes itself.",
">\n\nIts the Republican way he'll fit right in",
">\n\nAnd when all else fails he stares blankly like you’re speaking a different language.",
">\n\nIn other words, he’s a Republican.",
">\n\nHe sounds like most of the 8 yo I have ever had in school when confronted with a problem. They would start to lie, then I would say in my very best teacher voice, “And don’t you dare lie to me!” Pretty much works every time.",
">\n\nCan we all agree a sweater over a button down (w/ tie) under a sport coat is shit look"
] |
>
Trump protege | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara",
">\n\nBending more than water",
">\n\nI mean I've been known to tell a lie or two in my time, but somehow I've never catalyzed a daisy chain of lies that resulted in my winning a seat in congress under a fake name while on the run from Brazilian authorities.",
">\n\nThe script writes itself.",
">\n\nIts the Republican way he'll fit right in",
">\n\nAnd when all else fails he stares blankly like you’re speaking a different language.",
">\n\nIn other words, he’s a Republican.",
">\n\nHe sounds like most of the 8 yo I have ever had in school when confronted with a problem. They would start to lie, then I would say in my very best teacher voice, “And don’t you dare lie to me!” Pretty much works every time.",
">\n\nCan we all agree a sweater over a button down (w/ tie) under a sport coat is shit look",
">\n\nSantos is simply modeling after Donald Trump without the vicious attacks."
] |
>
Typical Republican. The only difference is that he got caught. | [
"Oh yes... the old Trump style of politicking . This guy knows how to win.",
">\n\nI wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his whole campaign was meant to be a distraction from Trump. Something he can point to and be like yeah I'm a liar and have all these scandals buy this guy is even worse.",
">\n\nTrump will probably ask Santos to be his running mate just so he won't have someone running loose that would steal his thunder.",
">\n\nWill Santos be First Lady?",
">\n\nFirst Kitara",
">\n\nBending more than water",
">\n\nI mean I've been known to tell a lie or two in my time, but somehow I've never catalyzed a daisy chain of lies that resulted in my winning a seat in congress under a fake name while on the run from Brazilian authorities.",
">\n\nThe script writes itself.",
">\n\nIts the Republican way he'll fit right in",
">\n\nAnd when all else fails he stares blankly like you’re speaking a different language.",
">\n\nIn other words, he’s a Republican.",
">\n\nHe sounds like most of the 8 yo I have ever had in school when confronted with a problem. They would start to lie, then I would say in my very best teacher voice, “And don’t you dare lie to me!” Pretty much works every time.",
">\n\nCan we all agree a sweater over a button down (w/ tie) under a sport coat is shit look",
">\n\nSantos is simply modeling after Donald Trump without the vicious attacks.",
">\n\nTrump protege"
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.