Datasets:

---

innovation-hacking2

/

shitposting_dataset1

like 0

[ "Impinging on the child's 2A rights is a violation of the US Constitution. \n/s", ">\n\nPaw Patrol: Special Victims Unit", ">\n\nThis week on Handy Manny we will learn to build small coffins.", ">\n\nBeech Grove, Indiana. Home of the 2022 IHSAA Class 3A basketball state champions. \nBonus story: Coach of said basketball team was busted for dealing cocaine 2 months after the season. These are 2 separate, not related, AT ALL, totally unrelated, stories", ">\n\nGuy should be thankful. Usually when a kid picks up a gun it ends much worse.\nNormally I'd post a link to back my claims, but we've all heard the stories and Tuesdays are already terrible enough without going down that rabbit hole.", ">\n\nFun Toy Banned Because Of Three Stupid Dead Kids", ">\n\nu/nottheakguy", ">\n\nWas dad another self proclaimed responsible good guy until this happened?", ">\n\n2A nuts will for sure dig up the fact that the guy shoplifted someone when he was 15 and claim he was a criminal with a gun.", ">\n\nMURICAAAA", ">\n\nWeLl ReGuLaTeD MiLiTia", ">\n\nRidiculous!" ]

[]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird" ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?" ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\"." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why" ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand" ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)" ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania" ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?" ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland" ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland", ">\n\nOceania is a continent. When people refer as to \"going to Australia\" they're going to Australia." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland", ">\n\nOceania is a continent. When people refer as to \"going to Australia\" they're going to Australia.", ">\n\nWhen exactly did this \"Oceania\" come to be? There are 7 continents taught in school and that is not one of them." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland", ">\n\nOceania is a continent. When people refer as to \"going to Australia\" they're going to Australia.", ">\n\nWhen exactly did this \"Oceania\" come to be? There are 7 continents taught in school and that is not one of them.", ">\n\nThat's just too Orwell crazy for me." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland", ">\n\nOceania is a continent. When people refer as to \"going to Australia\" they're going to Australia.", ">\n\nWhen exactly did this \"Oceania\" come to be? There are 7 continents taught in school and that is not one of them.", ">\n\nThat's just too Orwell crazy for me.", ">\n\nEveryone here saying OP is ignorant should chill out. OP already knows that Australia is a continent, and I believe he is only discussing the option of using the Oceania name for the continent. Wether you agree or not is part of the discussion.\nBy reading some of the comments I think this is already a very unpopular opinion. Good job OP." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland", ">\n\nOceania is a continent. When people refer as to \"going to Australia\" they're going to Australia.", ">\n\nWhen exactly did this \"Oceania\" come to be? There are 7 continents taught in school and that is not one of them.", ">\n\nThat's just too Orwell crazy for me.", ">\n\nEveryone here saying OP is ignorant should chill out. OP already knows that Australia is a continent, and I believe he is only discussing the option of using the Oceania name for the continent. Wether you agree or not is part of the discussion.\nBy reading some of the comments I think this is already a very unpopular opinion. Good job OP.", ">\n\nWhy is it important to differentiate between the continent and the country?" ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland", ">\n\nOceania is a continent. When people refer as to \"going to Australia\" they're going to Australia.", ">\n\nWhen exactly did this \"Oceania\" come to be? There are 7 continents taught in school and that is not one of them.", ">\n\nThat's just too Orwell crazy for me.", ">\n\nEveryone here saying OP is ignorant should chill out. OP already knows that Australia is a continent, and I believe he is only discussing the option of using the Oceania name for the continent. Wether you agree or not is part of the discussion.\nBy reading some of the comments I think this is already a very unpopular opinion. Good job OP.", ">\n\nWhy is it important to differentiate between the continent and the country?", ">\n\nUh, in spanish we refer to it as Oceania, or at least where I'm from. This is a first for me - you guys refer to Australia, the country, also as the continent? Huh, interesting." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland", ">\n\nOceania is a continent. When people refer as to \"going to Australia\" they're going to Australia.", ">\n\nWhen exactly did this \"Oceania\" come to be? There are 7 continents taught in school and that is not one of them.", ">\n\nThat's just too Orwell crazy for me.", ">\n\nEveryone here saying OP is ignorant should chill out. OP already knows that Australia is a continent, and I believe he is only discussing the option of using the Oceania name for the continent. Wether you agree or not is part of the discussion.\nBy reading some of the comments I think this is already a very unpopular opinion. Good job OP.", ">\n\nWhy is it important to differentiate between the continent and the country?", ">\n\nUh, in spanish we refer to it as Oceania, or at least where I'm from. This is a first for me - you guys refer to Australia, the country, also as the continent? Huh, interesting.", ">\n\nNooooooo." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland", ">\n\nOceania is a continent. When people refer as to \"going to Australia\" they're going to Australia.", ">\n\nWhen exactly did this \"Oceania\" come to be? There are 7 continents taught in school and that is not one of them.", ">\n\nThat's just too Orwell crazy for me.", ">\n\nEveryone here saying OP is ignorant should chill out. OP already knows that Australia is a continent, and I believe he is only discussing the option of using the Oceania name for the continent. Wether you agree or not is part of the discussion.\nBy reading some of the comments I think this is already a very unpopular opinion. Good job OP.", ">\n\nWhy is it important to differentiate between the continent and the country?", ">\n\nUh, in spanish we refer to it as Oceania, or at least where I'm from. This is a first for me - you guys refer to Australia, the country, also as the continent? Huh, interesting.", ">\n\nNooooooo.", ">\n\nNever once in my life have I asked that question when someone talks about going to Australia." ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland", ">\n\nOceania is a continent. When people refer as to \"going to Australia\" they're going to Australia.", ">\n\nWhen exactly did this \"Oceania\" come to be? There are 7 continents taught in school and that is not one of them.", ">\n\nThat's just too Orwell crazy for me.", ">\n\nEveryone here saying OP is ignorant should chill out. OP already knows that Australia is a continent, and I believe he is only discussing the option of using the Oceania name for the continent. Wether you agree or not is part of the discussion.\nBy reading some of the comments I think this is already a very unpopular opinion. Good job OP.", ">\n\nWhy is it important to differentiate between the continent and the country?", ">\n\nUh, in spanish we refer to it as Oceania, or at least where I'm from. This is a first for me - you guys refer to Australia, the country, also as the continent? Huh, interesting.", ">\n\nNooooooo.", ">\n\nNever once in my life have I asked that question when someone talks about going to Australia.", ">\n\nThis is one of those late night stoned thoughts" ]

[ "Isn't as much land in Australia??? It's the 6th largest country.", ">\n\nThe continent of Australia is the smallest of the seven traditional continents. It is also called Sahul... but apparently OP didn't do any research before declaring their \"opinion\".\nI am not sure this even counts as it is just so ignorant.", ">\n\nCalling australia sahul is like calling africa pangea. \nNo one here uses it either, its always australia, australasia or oceania.", ">\n\nNo, Oceania is not the same as the Australian Continent, nor is Australasia. New Zealand is part of both and New Zealand is part of the continent of Zealandia.\nThe only alternate name the Australian Continent has is Sahul.", ">\n\nI gurss you're right, but 8 continents seems weird", ">\n\n\n“I’m going to australia ” like how do you know if it the continent or the country\n\nIt's both so why worry about making a distinction?", ">\n\nOP is worried that people can't say \"I am going to the Aru Islands\".", ">\n\nAru Islands is in Asia though.", ">\n\nBut they are on the Australian continent.", ">\n\nThey're just off Indonesia and on the Asian continent. It's right on the cusp though.", ">\n\nPlease provide a source because looking up if the Aru Islands are part of the Australian Continent, all the things I saw said yes.", ">\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.", ">\n\n\nI know. I looked at that and more. The challenge was for RubenLay23 to provide a source that the Aru Islands are part of the Asian Continent.\n\nYes, I was agreeing with you and showing the reason why", ">\n\nSorry, I thought you had misinterpreted what I asked.", ">\n\n\n\nAustralia is almost the same size as the lower 48, it’s quite big\n\n\nEven though Australia is a continent and a country, if you tell someone that you are going to Australia, they know you mean Australia the country, because there are only 2 countries in the continent of Australia, which are Australia and Papau New Guinea \n\n\nOceania is a separate term for all the islands that aren’t part of the continental plate ie New Zealand", ">\n\nNot completely correct.\nThere are many Islands that make up the Australian Continent, but the two you mentioned are the largest.\nOceania includes Australia and other nations, that I mentioned in my reply. New Zealand is still part of Oceania though. (it is part of Australasia, which includes Australia too)", ">\n\nAustralia (country) and Papau New Guinea are the only actual countries that are part of Australia (continent).\nWhilst yes there are other islands, none of them are actually countries in Australia (continent), they are part of Oceania", ">\n\nI guess the distinction you're making is whether it is part of the continental landmass or an island that is on the tectonic plate?", ">\n\nSomeone missed their elementary geography class.", ">\n\n\nOceania is already a place. It includes Australasia, Micronesia, Polynesia and Melanesia.\nWhen you say you are going to Australia, it is the country you are going to. If you were going to any of the Islands that are part of the continent, you would say \"I am going to New Guinea\" or whatever the name of the island you are going to is.\nWhy did you pick Oceania? How did you not know it was already a place name?\n\nEdit: I don't think this is an unpopular opinion. It is merely ignorant. Had OP done any research, they would have known they were spouting nonsense.", ">\n\nAustralia is a continent and a country. When you say you're going there people don't question where you're going.", ">\n\nAustralia is part of Oceania... Oceania is a place already. I am in Oceania right now, on the micro continent Zealandia.", ">\n\nI didn't say anything about Oceania.", ">\n\nI am sorry for pointing out another flaw in OP's argument.", ">\n\nNo, because continental Australia (Sahul) is based on the Indo-Australian Plate (Australian Plate). This doesn't technically include places like New Zealand or Papua New Guinea.\nOceania includes New Zealand, but New Zealand sits on it's own continental plate called Zealandia, which has technically been considered a continent since 2017/18. It also includes Papua New Guinea which sits on the edge of the Australian Plate. Oceania is smaller than Australasia.\nAustralasia includes the Zealandia plate, Papua New Guinea, multiple other smaller countries, and micro-regions like Melanesia.\nMight be some small discrepancies since this is complicated af, but no term should really replace continental Australia. Oceania includes two continental plates and Australasia has countries far outside continental Australia and Zealandia.", ">\n\nThis badly thought out.", ">\n\nIt should be call australeroo.", ">\n\nOr rippabonzaland", ">\n\nOceania is a continent. When people refer as to \"going to Australia\" they're going to Australia.", ">\n\nWhen exactly did this \"Oceania\" come to be? There are 7 continents taught in school and that is not one of them.", ">\n\nThat's just too Orwell crazy for me.", ">\n\nEveryone here saying OP is ignorant should chill out. OP already knows that Australia is a continent, and I believe he is only discussing the option of using the Oceania name for the continent. Wether you agree or not is part of the discussion.\nBy reading some of the comments I think this is already a very unpopular opinion. Good job OP.", ">\n\nWhy is it important to differentiate between the continent and the country?", ">\n\nUh, in spanish we refer to it as Oceania, or at least where I'm from. This is a first for me - you guys refer to Australia, the country, also as the continent? Huh, interesting.", ">\n\nNooooooo.", ">\n\nNever once in my life have I asked that question when someone talks about going to Australia.", ">\n\nThis is one of those late night stoned thoughts", ">\n\nSomeone: \"I'm going to visit Australia\"\nOP: \"Oh you mean you're going to the Aru Islands or Papua New Guinea?\"\nWhat even is that thought process? When people say that they're going to Australia, they mean that they're going to Australia." ]

[]

[ "This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.\nRemember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not \"thoughts had in the shower!\"\n(For an explanation of what a \"showerthought\" is, please read this page.)\nRule-breaking posts may result in bans." ]

[]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever." ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again." ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again.", ">\n\nI don’t have words for it. Hopefully what he has coming is worse than the easy way out." ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again.", ">\n\nI don’t have words for it. Hopefully what he has coming is worse than the easy way out.", ">\n\nI checked with my gods, he's coming back as a tapeworm in a street dog's butt." ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again.", ">\n\nI don’t have words for it. Hopefully what he has coming is worse than the easy way out.", ">\n\nI checked with my gods, he's coming back as a tapeworm in a street dog's butt.", ">\n\nWhat did the dog do to have to deal with such a creature in its system." ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again.", ">\n\nI don’t have words for it. Hopefully what he has coming is worse than the easy way out.", ">\n\nI checked with my gods, he's coming back as a tapeworm in a street dog's butt.", ">\n\nWhat did the dog do to have to deal with such a creature in its system.", ">\n\nHow does a person become that evil?" ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again.", ">\n\nI don’t have words for it. Hopefully what he has coming is worse than the easy way out.", ">\n\nI checked with my gods, he's coming back as a tapeworm in a street dog's butt.", ">\n\nWhat did the dog do to have to deal with such a creature in its system.", ">\n\nHow does a person become that evil?", ">\n\nMaybe got kicked out of art school?" ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again.", ">\n\nI don’t have words for it. Hopefully what he has coming is worse than the easy way out.", ">\n\nI checked with my gods, he's coming back as a tapeworm in a street dog's butt.", ">\n\nWhat did the dog do to have to deal with such a creature in its system.", ">\n\nHow does a person become that evil?", ">\n\nMaybe got kicked out of art school?", ">\n\nHeard he loves gas stoves too" ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again.", ">\n\nI don’t have words for it. Hopefully what he has coming is worse than the easy way out.", ">\n\nI checked with my gods, he's coming back as a tapeworm in a street dog's butt.", ">\n\nWhat did the dog do to have to deal with such a creature in its system.", ">\n\nHow does a person become that evil?", ">\n\nMaybe got kicked out of art school?", ">\n\nHeard he loves gas stoves too", ">\n\nMan, I wish I had not read that article." ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again.", ">\n\nI don’t have words for it. Hopefully what he has coming is worse than the easy way out.", ">\n\nI checked with my gods, he's coming back as a tapeworm in a street dog's butt.", ">\n\nWhat did the dog do to have to deal with such a creature in its system.", ">\n\nHow does a person become that evil?", ">\n\nMaybe got kicked out of art school?", ">\n\nHeard he loves gas stoves too", ">\n\nMan, I wish I had not read that article.", ">\n\nMe too. Prison will not be kind to this man." ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again.", ">\n\nI don’t have words for it. Hopefully what he has coming is worse than the easy way out.", ">\n\nI checked with my gods, he's coming back as a tapeworm in a street dog's butt.", ">\n\nWhat did the dog do to have to deal with such a creature in its system.", ">\n\nHow does a person become that evil?", ">\n\nMaybe got kicked out of art school?", ">\n\nHeard he loves gas stoves too", ">\n\nMan, I wish I had not read that article.", ">\n\nMe too. Prison will not be kind to this man.", ">\n\nDude’s gonna get beaten to death in prison." ]

[ "That poor child. May she rest in peace and may her abusers rot in jail forever.", ">\n\nthe most absolutely pathetic thing you can do as a grown ass man is lay hands on a child.\ni hope this peice of human garbage gets stuck in a dark hole and never see's the light of day again.", ">\n\nI don’t have words for it. Hopefully what he has coming is worse than the easy way out.", ">\n\nI checked with my gods, he's coming back as a tapeworm in a street dog's butt.", ">\n\nWhat did the dog do to have to deal with such a creature in its system.", ">\n\nHow does a person become that evil?", ">\n\nMaybe got kicked out of art school?", ">\n\nHeard he loves gas stoves too", ">\n\nMan, I wish I had not read that article.", ">\n\nMe too. Prison will not be kind to this man.", ">\n\nDude’s gonna get beaten to death in prison.", ">\n\nHe beat her at midnight. Why wasn’t she sleeping soundly in bed? What could she possibly have done to provoke him to beat her that badly? At all? A tiny child. Breaks my heart." ]

[]

[ "Its called aiding in human trafficking." ]

[ "Its called aiding in human trafficking.", ">\n\nProsecuting for illegal immigration?" ]

[ "Its called aiding in human trafficking.", ">\n\nProsecuting for illegal immigration?", ">\n\nBy helping illegal migrants those groups encourage more illegal migration. Why spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued? Why try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others? But I would say, that if that rescuer is truthful about the sentence she might receive, the punishment is way too harsh." ]

[ "Its called aiding in human trafficking.", ">\n\nProsecuting for illegal immigration?", ">\n\nBy helping illegal migrants those groups encourage more illegal migration. Why spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued? Why try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others? But I would say, that if that rescuer is truthful about the sentence she might receive, the punishment is way too harsh.", ">\n\n\nWhy spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued?\n\nIf you can enter a country \"legally\", meaning via conventional immigration mechanisms, you arent a refugee in thos context. Those are mutually exclusive.\nSecondly, those human traffickers are not cheap by any means.\n\nWhy try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others?\n\nThats like chastising the jews for fleeing nazi germany instead of \"building it up\" and \"improving their country/democracy\" etc.\nThose things are a lot easier said than done from the comfort of live in a safe and wealthy western country, just saying." ]

[ "Its called aiding in human trafficking.", ">\n\nProsecuting for illegal immigration?", ">\n\nBy helping illegal migrants those groups encourage more illegal migration. Why spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued? Why try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others? But I would say, that if that rescuer is truthful about the sentence she might receive, the punishment is way too harsh.", ">\n\n\nWhy spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued?\n\nIf you can enter a country \"legally\", meaning via conventional immigration mechanisms, you arent a refugee in thos context. Those are mutually exclusive.\nSecondly, those human traffickers are not cheap by any means.\n\nWhy try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others?\n\nThats like chastising the jews for fleeing nazi germany instead of \"building it up\" and \"improving their country/democracy\" etc.\nThose things are a lot easier said than done from the comfort of live in a safe and wealthy western country, just saying.", ">\n\nAh, famous comparison of anything and everything to jews and nazi's. Are all illegal immigrants coming through several safe countries were in danger of being put to concentration camps back in their countries? All those healthy adult males, that somehow are so persecuted, that they rarely take more vulnerable women and children with them, while moving to another country. I think not. Illegal immigrants do not stay in the first country that can offer them shelter, they want better welfare, and that is a fact. And yes, I live in a safe, even if not very wealthy western country. And before you assume, my country never had colonies, never invaded anyone. Instead of leaving to more wealthy country, people remained here, and made my country safe by constant hard work. Funny thing is, my country also had some groups of refugees from Syria several years ago. They never stayed a week. They were given shelter, food, housing, and money. One night, they left, crossed the border illegally again, and went to Germany. Because Germany paid more money to refugees than other countries do." ]

[ "Its called aiding in human trafficking.", ">\n\nProsecuting for illegal immigration?", ">\n\nBy helping illegal migrants those groups encourage more illegal migration. Why spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued? Why try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others? But I would say, that if that rescuer is truthful about the sentence she might receive, the punishment is way too harsh.", ">\n\n\nWhy spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued?\n\nIf you can enter a country \"legally\", meaning via conventional immigration mechanisms, you arent a refugee in thos context. Those are mutually exclusive.\nSecondly, those human traffickers are not cheap by any means.\n\nWhy try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others?\n\nThats like chastising the jews for fleeing nazi germany instead of \"building it up\" and \"improving their country/democracy\" etc.\nThose things are a lot easier said than done from the comfort of live in a safe and wealthy western country, just saying.", ">\n\nAh, famous comparison of anything and everything to jews and nazi's. Are all illegal immigrants coming through several safe countries were in danger of being put to concentration camps back in their countries? All those healthy adult males, that somehow are so persecuted, that they rarely take more vulnerable women and children with them, while moving to another country. I think not. Illegal immigrants do not stay in the first country that can offer them shelter, they want better welfare, and that is a fact. And yes, I live in a safe, even if not very wealthy western country. And before you assume, my country never had colonies, never invaded anyone. Instead of leaving to more wealthy country, people remained here, and made my country safe by constant hard work. Funny thing is, my country also had some groups of refugees from Syria several years ago. They never stayed a week. They were given shelter, food, housing, and money. One night, they left, crossed the border illegally again, and went to Germany. Because Germany paid more money to refugees than other countries do.", ">\n\n\nAh, famous comparison of anything and everything to jews and nazi's\n\nJust pointing out that your argument of \"why dont they simply stay\" isnt a well thought out one. Just for a second think about the inherent dangers these refugees even are exposed to on these journeys. They are literally risking their lives, with thousands upon thousands having died on these journeys. This is not a risk you take over mere discomfort or because youre annoyed by the outcome of an election, so to speak. \nWhether its Jews fleeing the Nazis, the rwandan genocide or civilians fleeing the khmer rouge regime, you name it, history has numerous examples, unfortunately. \n\nAnd yes, I live in a safe, even if not very wealthy western country. And before you assume, my country never had colonies, never invaded anyone.\n\nTherefore yes, it is not only cheap and easy but also ignorant to tell people who experience genuinely hellish circumstances to \"just work on improving your own country\".\nTalking a big game on an anonymous internet platform from, as i said, complete safety in a wealthy (btw, even if your country might not be wealthy compared to other western countries it is still a lot wealthier than about 90% of the countries in the world) western country. \n\nAre all illegal immigrants coming through several safe countries were in danger of being put to concentration camps back in their countries?\n\nConcentration camps were literally just an efficient and concentrated means for political persecution and extermination of the \"undesirables\". It was unique in its scale, cruelty and horrific mechanisation of the act, but the act of arresting and killing unwanted people was not. Political persecution and subsequent execution very much persist to this day.\nSo to answer your question, are these refugees youre speaking about, the brown kind, at risk of landing in concentration camps? Likely not.\nAre they are risk of being rounded up and killed off for any kind of reason that can be as miniscule as wearing the wrong type of dress code or facial hair? Yes.\nSo, are you suggesting that extrajudicial killings are more tolerable because it didnt happen in ww2 concentration camps?\n\nAll those healthy adult males, that somehow are so persecuted, that they rarely take more vulnerable women and children with them, while moving to another country\n\nActually, one reason for that is because the journeys are long and dangerous, hence families would often send the youngest and strongest (=most likely to survive) to take on the journey and then have the family come later, once he received asylum.\n\nInstead of leaving to more wealthy country, people remained here, and made my country safe by constant hard work.\n\nI highly doubt your country was ever, at any point, regarded a failed state, just saying. So the equivalent of you comparing a western country to, lets say afghanistan, is about the same as a trust fund kid giving oliver twist monetary advice. The situations are not comparable." ]

[ "Its called aiding in human trafficking.", ">\n\nProsecuting for illegal immigration?", ">\n\nBy helping illegal migrants those groups encourage more illegal migration. Why spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued? Why try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others? But I would say, that if that rescuer is truthful about the sentence she might receive, the punishment is way too harsh.", ">\n\n\nWhy spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued?\n\nIf you can enter a country \"legally\", meaning via conventional immigration mechanisms, you arent a refugee in thos context. Those are mutually exclusive.\nSecondly, those human traffickers are not cheap by any means.\n\nWhy try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others?\n\nThats like chastising the jews for fleeing nazi germany instead of \"building it up\" and \"improving their country/democracy\" etc.\nThose things are a lot easier said than done from the comfort of live in a safe and wealthy western country, just saying.", ">\n\nAh, famous comparison of anything and everything to jews and nazi's. Are all illegal immigrants coming through several safe countries were in danger of being put to concentration camps back in their countries? All those healthy adult males, that somehow are so persecuted, that they rarely take more vulnerable women and children with them, while moving to another country. I think not. Illegal immigrants do not stay in the first country that can offer them shelter, they want better welfare, and that is a fact. And yes, I live in a safe, even if not very wealthy western country. And before you assume, my country never had colonies, never invaded anyone. Instead of leaving to more wealthy country, people remained here, and made my country safe by constant hard work. Funny thing is, my country also had some groups of refugees from Syria several years ago. They never stayed a week. They were given shelter, food, housing, and money. One night, they left, crossed the border illegally again, and went to Germany. Because Germany paid more money to refugees than other countries do.", ">\n\n\nAh, famous comparison of anything and everything to jews and nazi's\n\nJust pointing out that your argument of \"why dont they simply stay\" isnt a well thought out one. Just for a second think about the inherent dangers these refugees even are exposed to on these journeys. They are literally risking their lives, with thousands upon thousands having died on these journeys. This is not a risk you take over mere discomfort or because youre annoyed by the outcome of an election, so to speak. \nWhether its Jews fleeing the Nazis, the rwandan genocide or civilians fleeing the khmer rouge regime, you name it, history has numerous examples, unfortunately. \n\nAnd yes, I live in a safe, even if not very wealthy western country. And before you assume, my country never had colonies, never invaded anyone.\n\nTherefore yes, it is not only cheap and easy but also ignorant to tell people who experience genuinely hellish circumstances to \"just work on improving your own country\".\nTalking a big game on an anonymous internet platform from, as i said, complete safety in a wealthy (btw, even if your country might not be wealthy compared to other western countries it is still a lot wealthier than about 90% of the countries in the world) western country. \n\nAre all illegal immigrants coming through several safe countries were in danger of being put to concentration camps back in their countries?\n\nConcentration camps were literally just an efficient and concentrated means for political persecution and extermination of the \"undesirables\". It was unique in its scale, cruelty and horrific mechanisation of the act, but the act of arresting and killing unwanted people was not. Political persecution and subsequent execution very much persist to this day.\nSo to answer your question, are these refugees youre speaking about, the brown kind, at risk of landing in concentration camps? Likely not.\nAre they are risk of being rounded up and killed off for any kind of reason that can be as miniscule as wearing the wrong type of dress code or facial hair? Yes.\nSo, are you suggesting that extrajudicial killings are more tolerable because it didnt happen in ww2 concentration camps?\n\nAll those healthy adult males, that somehow are so persecuted, that they rarely take more vulnerable women and children with them, while moving to another country\n\nActually, one reason for that is because the journeys are long and dangerous, hence families would often send the youngest and strongest (=most likely to survive) to take on the journey and then have the family come later, once he received asylum.\n\nInstead of leaving to more wealthy country, people remained here, and made my country safe by constant hard work.\n\nI highly doubt your country was ever, at any point, regarded a failed state, just saying. So the equivalent of you comparing a western country to, lets say afghanistan, is about the same as a trust fund kid giving oliver twist monetary advice. The situations are not comparable.", ">\n\nYou assume, that they always flee the regime. If they need a safe country, they do not need to go to Europe. Staying in a neighbouring country that do not have war or conflict is better, because it usually have similar customs and culture, so less time needed for assimilation, less chance of xenophobia. Somehow, you cannot comprehend, that most people become illegal migrants putely for financial gain. They risk their lives for a chance to get more money. It is simple as that. Also, it is interesting, how you say, that families send their strongest, but leave their weakest to suffer under some horrible regime, instead of making sure that most vulnerable and those that actually need help the most, could get it first and it shoud be seen as normal. And again, you cannot expect your country to ever prosper, if all the population leaves. It is not an ignorant advice. If you need ww2 parallels, war completely devastated multiple european countries, yet people stayed and fought. They could just run away to another corner of the world, and let nazi's take all the land, leave all their weak relatives to die. But they stayed and fought and won. Also, it is very ignorant to believe, that western countries never had any significant hardships during the course of history. You should learn actual history, before saying that every western country equals happy rich life since the dawn of times, with no genocidal regimes, wars and conflicts, mass poverty periods." ]

[ "Its called aiding in human trafficking.", ">\n\nProsecuting for illegal immigration?", ">\n\nBy helping illegal migrants those groups encourage more illegal migration. Why spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued? Why try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others? But I would say, that if that rescuer is truthful about the sentence she might receive, the punishment is way too harsh.", ">\n\n\nWhy spend money and time going legal way, if you can just pay only to get the in the boat, sail out and wait to be rescued?\n\nIf you can enter a country \"legally\", meaning via conventional immigration mechanisms, you arent a refugee in thos context. Those are mutually exclusive.\nSecondly, those human traffickers are not cheap by any means.\n\nWhy try to fix the situation in your own country, if you can just move to a better place, where everything is already built by others?\n\nThats like chastising the jews for fleeing nazi germany instead of \"building it up\" and \"improving their country/democracy\" etc.\nThose things are a lot easier said than done from the comfort of live in a safe and wealthy western country, just saying.", ">\n\nAh, famous comparison of anything and everything to jews and nazi's. Are all illegal immigrants coming through several safe countries were in danger of being put to concentration camps back in their countries? All those healthy adult males, that somehow are so persecuted, that they rarely take more vulnerable women and children with them, while moving to another country. I think not. Illegal immigrants do not stay in the first country that can offer them shelter, they want better welfare, and that is a fact. And yes, I live in a safe, even if not very wealthy western country. And before you assume, my country never had colonies, never invaded anyone. Instead of leaving to more wealthy country, people remained here, and made my country safe by constant hard work. Funny thing is, my country also had some groups of refugees from Syria several years ago. They never stayed a week. They were given shelter, food, housing, and money. One night, they left, crossed the border illegally again, and went to Germany. Because Germany paid more money to refugees than other countries do.", ">\n\n\nAh, famous comparison of anything and everything to jews and nazi's\n\nJust pointing out that your argument of \"why dont they simply stay\" isnt a well thought out one. Just for a second think about the inherent dangers these refugees even are exposed to on these journeys. They are literally risking their lives, with thousands upon thousands having died on these journeys. This is not a risk you take over mere discomfort or because youre annoyed by the outcome of an election, so to speak. \nWhether its Jews fleeing the Nazis, the rwandan genocide or civilians fleeing the khmer rouge regime, you name it, history has numerous examples, unfortunately. \n\nAnd yes, I live in a safe, even if not very wealthy western country. And before you assume, my country never had colonies, never invaded anyone.\n\nTherefore yes, it is not only cheap and easy but also ignorant to tell people who experience genuinely hellish circumstances to \"just work on improving your own country\".\nTalking a big game on an anonymous internet platform from, as i said, complete safety in a wealthy (btw, even if your country might not be wealthy compared to other western countries it is still a lot wealthier than about 90% of the countries in the world) western country. \n\nAre all illegal immigrants coming through several safe countries were in danger of being put to concentration camps back in their countries?\n\nConcentration camps were literally just an efficient and concentrated means for political persecution and extermination of the \"undesirables\". It was unique in its scale, cruelty and horrific mechanisation of the act, but the act of arresting and killing unwanted people was not. Political persecution and subsequent execution very much persist to this day.\nSo to answer your question, are these refugees youre speaking about, the brown kind, at risk of landing in concentration camps? Likely not.\nAre they are risk of being rounded up and killed off for any kind of reason that can be as miniscule as wearing the wrong type of dress code or facial hair? Yes.\nSo, are you suggesting that extrajudicial killings are more tolerable because it didnt happen in ww2 concentration camps?\n\nAll those healthy adult males, that somehow are so persecuted, that they rarely take more vulnerable women and children with them, while moving to another country\n\nActually, one reason for that is because the journeys are long and dangerous, hence families would often send the youngest and strongest (=most likely to survive) to take on the journey and then have the family come later, once he received asylum.\n\nInstead of leaving to more wealthy country, people remained here, and made my country safe by constant hard work.\n\nI highly doubt your country was ever, at any point, regarded a failed state, just saying. So the equivalent of you comparing a western country to, lets say afghanistan, is about the same as a trust fund kid giving oliver twist monetary advice. The situations are not comparable.", ">\n\nYou assume, that they always flee the regime. If they need a safe country, they do not need to go to Europe. Staying in a neighbouring country that do not have war or conflict is better, because it usually have similar customs and culture, so less time needed for assimilation, less chance of xenophobia. Somehow, you cannot comprehend, that most people become illegal migrants putely for financial gain. They risk their lives for a chance to get more money. It is simple as that. Also, it is interesting, how you say, that families send their strongest, but leave their weakest to suffer under some horrible regime, instead of making sure that most vulnerable and those that actually need help the most, could get it first and it shoud be seen as normal. And again, you cannot expect your country to ever prosper, if all the population leaves. It is not an ignorant advice. If you need ww2 parallels, war completely devastated multiple european countries, yet people stayed and fought. They could just run away to another corner of the world, and let nazi's take all the land, leave all their weak relatives to die. But they stayed and fought and won. Also, it is very ignorant to believe, that western countries never had any significant hardships during the course of history. You should learn actual history, before saying that every western country equals happy rich life since the dawn of times, with no genocidal regimes, wars and conflicts, mass poverty periods.", ">\n\nI assume the EU is willing to take these immigrants in themselves? /s" ]

[]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia" ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"" ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"" ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose" ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?" ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean..." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"" ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”" ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees.", ">\n\nA giant angry chicken the length of a bus." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees.", ">\n\nA giant angry chicken the length of a bus.", ">\n\nI want one!" ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees.", ">\n\nA giant angry chicken the length of a bus.", ">\n\nI want one!", ">\n\nWhen the hell will they edit Jurrassic Park and make all dinosaurs with feathers.\nWe need the T-Rex to look like a giant colourful murderous rooster damnit." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees.", ">\n\nA giant angry chicken the length of a bus.", ">\n\nI want one!", ">\n\nWhen the hell will they edit Jurrassic Park and make all dinosaurs with feathers.\nWe need the T-Rex to look like a giant colourful murderous rooster damnit.", ">\n\nFossil skin from adult Tyrannosaurs (Gorgosaurus I believe) showed no feathers. Fossil skin from a juvenile early Tyrannosaur does show feathers" ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees.", ">\n\nA giant angry chicken the length of a bus.", ">\n\nI want one!", ">\n\nWhen the hell will they edit Jurrassic Park and make all dinosaurs with feathers.\nWe need the T-Rex to look like a giant colourful murderous rooster damnit.", ">\n\nFossil skin from adult Tyrannosaurs (Gorgosaurus I believe) showed no feathers. Fossil skin from a juvenile early Tyrannosaur does show feathers", ">\n\naaaw, damnit.\nSo it could have been something mostly juveniles had as protection and/or camouflage and later shed." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees.", ">\n\nA giant angry chicken the length of a bus.", ">\n\nI want one!", ">\n\nWhen the hell will they edit Jurrassic Park and make all dinosaurs with feathers.\nWe need the T-Rex to look like a giant colourful murderous rooster damnit.", ">\n\nFossil skin from adult Tyrannosaurs (Gorgosaurus I believe) showed no feathers. Fossil skin from a juvenile early Tyrannosaur does show feathers", ">\n\naaaw, damnit.\nSo it could have been something mostly juveniles had as protection and/or camouflage and later shed.", ">\n\nThat appears to be the consensus for Tyrannosaurs." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees.", ">\n\nA giant angry chicken the length of a bus.", ">\n\nI want one!", ">\n\nWhen the hell will they edit Jurrassic Park and make all dinosaurs with feathers.\nWe need the T-Rex to look like a giant colourful murderous rooster damnit.", ">\n\nFossil skin from adult Tyrannosaurs (Gorgosaurus I believe) showed no feathers. Fossil skin from a juvenile early Tyrannosaur does show feathers", ">\n\naaaw, damnit.\nSo it could have been something mostly juveniles had as protection and/or camouflage and later shed.", ">\n\nThat appears to be the consensus for Tyrannosaurs.", ">\n\nWell...camouflage might be rather pointless when you are the size of a house and the top of the foodchain." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees.", ">\n\nA giant angry chicken the length of a bus.", ">\n\nI want one!", ">\n\nWhen the hell will they edit Jurrassic Park and make all dinosaurs with feathers.\nWe need the T-Rex to look like a giant colourful murderous rooster damnit.", ">\n\nFossil skin from adult Tyrannosaurs (Gorgosaurus I believe) showed no feathers. Fossil skin from a juvenile early Tyrannosaur does show feathers", ">\n\naaaw, damnit.\nSo it could have been something mostly juveniles had as protection and/or camouflage and later shed.", ">\n\nThat appears to be the consensus for Tyrannosaurs.", ">\n\nWell...camouflage might be rather pointless when you are the size of a house and the top of the foodchain.", ">\n\nI don't even click dinosaur articles because there's never pictures and it's not that I don't believe you, butt I'm a picture type of guy." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees.", ">\n\nA giant angry chicken the length of a bus.", ">\n\nI want one!", ">\n\nWhen the hell will they edit Jurrassic Park and make all dinosaurs with feathers.\nWe need the T-Rex to look like a giant colourful murderous rooster damnit.", ">\n\nFossil skin from adult Tyrannosaurs (Gorgosaurus I believe) showed no feathers. Fossil skin from a juvenile early Tyrannosaur does show feathers", ">\n\naaaw, damnit.\nSo it could have been something mostly juveniles had as protection and/or camouflage and later shed.", ">\n\nThat appears to be the consensus for Tyrannosaurs.", ">\n\nWell...camouflage might be rather pointless when you are the size of a house and the top of the foodchain.", ">\n\nI don't even click dinosaur articles because there's never pictures and it's not that I don't believe you, butt I'm a picture type of guy.", ">\n\n\nMegaraptors, as you might expect, were much bigger, with most species ranging between 6 and 8 m (20 and 26 ft) long and standing a few feet taller than an adult human. They may not have been as large and powerful as fellow carnivores like the T-rex, but they were arguably even more terrifying." ]

[ "Beware of the feathered harbinger of death known only as the megaraptor not to be mistaken with the velociraptor who is a tiny chicken.", ">\n\nMegaraptors aren't dromaeosaurs (raptors), (they may have been feathered, but this is unclear). They are a medium sized type of dinosaur with a large sickle claw on their hand (similar to Baryonychine spinosaurs, Noasaurs and Neovenatorids... it appears many dinosaurs had hand claws). The featherd dionsaur being referred to is the Dromaeosaur Unenlagia", ">\n\nDinos go \"rawr!\"", ">\n\nMany dinosaurs, such as Hadrosaurs, probably went \"honk\"", ">\n\nThat does give Jurassic park a less intense vibe.", ">\n\nYou have obviously never met a goose", ">\n\nI've been terrorised by a few Canadian goose on my time. Honestly moose park would be just as majestic and terrifying. Probably couldn't have made it into the kitchen though.", ">\n\nMisleading title. \nReuters' title gives the impression that fossils containing evidence of feathered dinosaurs were found.\nUnless I missed it somehow, the article doesn't talk about finding any evidence of feathers at all. \nThe megaraptor remains they found \"also include some unusual remains of unenlagia, velociraptor-like dinosaurs which likely lived covered in feathers.\"\nKnock it off with the ambiguous click-bait titles, Reuters. You're better than that.", ">\n\nUsed to be better than that.", ">\n\nFor dinosaurs, is there a taxonomy-based meaning for \"raptor?\" (as opposed to things like an allosaurus or a T-rex or other non-raptor names). If not, is there some sort of size limit before it stops being a dinosaur raptor and starts being some other name, or part of the T-Rex family or something?", ">\n\nRaptor is informal; the family is largely Dromaeosauridae. Lots in this family are called raptors (in their name), lots aren’t. Raptor itself means “snatching/seizing” and the clade Maniraptor, of which Dromaeosaurids are a part, references the shared feature of their hands/wrist structures.", ">\n\nMegaraptorids however are not Dromaeosaurs, being closer to either the Allosauroid Neovenator, the ceratosaur Noasaurus, basal Tyrannosaurs (e.g Proceratosaurus) or the base of Coelorosauria (e.g Ornitholestes). It is not yet agreed where Megaraptorids go.", ">\n\nNo photos, no artist's rendering. If you care about that kind of thing I mean...", ">\n\n\nScientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.\n\"We were missing a piece,\" Marcelo Leppe, director of the Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH), told Reuters. \"We knew where there were large mammals, there would also be large carnivores, but we hadn't found them yet.\"", ">\n\n“Jan 16 (Reuters) - Scientists in Chile's Patagonia region are unearthing the southernmost dinosaur fossils recorded outside Antarctica, including remains of megaraptors that would have dominated the area's food chain before their mass extinction.\nFossils of megaraptors, a carnivorous dinosaur that inhabited parts of South America during the Cretaceous period some 70 million years ago, were found in sizes up to 10 meters long, according to the Journal of South American Earth Sciences.”", ">\n\n\nwere found in sizes up to 10 meters long\n\nHahah JFC what a terrifying thought. Running through the Amazon with one of these things chasing you through the trees.", ">\n\nA giant angry chicken the length of a bus.", ">\n\nI want one!", ">\n\nWhen the hell will they edit Jurrassic Park and make all dinosaurs with feathers.\nWe need the T-Rex to look like a giant colourful murderous rooster damnit.", ">\n\nFossil skin from adult Tyrannosaurs (Gorgosaurus I believe) showed no feathers. Fossil skin from a juvenile early Tyrannosaur does show feathers", ">\n\naaaw, damnit.\nSo it could have been something mostly juveniles had as protection and/or camouflage and later shed.", ">\n\nThat appears to be the consensus for Tyrannosaurs.", ">\n\nWell...camouflage might be rather pointless when you are the size of a house and the top of the foodchain.", ">\n\nI don't even click dinosaur articles because there's never pictures and it's not that I don't believe you, butt I'm a picture type of guy.", ">\n\n\nMegaraptors, as you might expect, were much bigger, with most species ranging between 6 and 8 m (20 and 26 ft) long and standing a few feet taller than an adult human. They may not have been as large and powerful as fellow carnivores like the T-rex, but they were arguably even more terrifying.", ">\n\nCan we hold off on announcing these for a few years? We really don't need another shitty Jurassic Park movie and this is just golden, shitty ammunition for them." ]

[]

[ "You're not wrong." ]

[ "You're not wrong.", ">\n\nNice been loving pyga, on the edge whether to buy or not. And it looks great with the sonnet!" ]

[ "You're not wrong.", ">\n\nNice been loving pyga, on the edge whether to buy or not. And it looks great with the sonnet!", ">\n\nWhich vendor did you use for Pyga?" ]

[ "You're not wrong.", ">\n\nNice been loving pyga, on the edge whether to buy or not. And it looks great with the sonnet!", ">\n\nWhich vendor did you use for Pyga?", ">\n\nMinokeys" ]

[ "You're not wrong.", ">\n\nNice been loving pyga, on the edge whether to buy or not. And it looks great with the sonnet!", ">\n\nWhich vendor did you use for Pyga?", ">\n\nMinokeys", ">\n\nIndeed it is. I was not impressed when I first saw this set as I thought \"This is yet another maroon/deep dark red\" set similar to red samurai and the likes, but then I was looking for a recent video about the Jris65 on yt and I found one where they use this set on a Milky white Jris and I realize what the hype was about, they are kind of translucent and have a gemstone like appearance (I think that's where the name comes from) they look absolutely gorgeous, definitely one of the more original sets I've seen recently (or ever)" ]

[]

[ "And then they wonder why they lose elections. This was settled law. It’s hard enough for a woman to make that choice and then you terrorize them legally?\nMaddening" ]

[ "And then they wonder why they lose elections. This was settled law. It’s hard enough for a woman to make that choice and then you terrorize them legally?\nMaddening", ">\n\nThe core policy planks of the Republican Party are: (1) protecting the rich from taxation; and (2) using state violence to enforce Christian morality." ]