danghungithp/text_dataset · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 0 2.94k
If they have no place to go, they begin to stall, and force
compression, stealing power from the vehicle (High Drag).
If you squeeze the fuselage, so that these pipes have aplace to bend
into, then drag is reduced.
Essentially, teh cross sectional area of the aircraft shoulf
remain constant for all areas of the fuselage. That is where the wings are
subtract, teh cross sectional area of the wings from the fuselage.
pat
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Pat) writes...
>In article <[email protected]> [email protected] (Ron Baalke) writes:
>\|Comet Gehrels 3, which was discovered in 1977, was determined to have
>\|been in a temporary Jovian orbit from 1970 to 1973. Comet Shoemaker-Levy 1993e
>\|may remain in orbit around Jupiter long enough to allow Galileo to
>\|make some closeup observations. The orbital trajectory for Comet
>\|Shoemaker-Levy is still being determined.
>a
>What about positional uncertainties in S-L 1993e?
If Comet Shoemaker-Levy 1993e is in Jovian orbit, and if the comet
is still hanging around when Galileo arrives, then I'm sure it will
be added to the list of targets. We'll have by then over two years
of Earth-based observations to help narrow down the positions of the
pieces of the comet. It probably won't be too much different than
what was done with Gaspra.
>But when they were
>imaging toutatis?
Galileo did not image Toutatis. That came from Earth-based radar.
/_ /\| /____/ \ /_ /\| Ron Baalke \| [email protected]
\| \| \| \| __ \ /\| \| \| \| Jet Propulsion Lab \|
___\| \| \| \| \|__) \|/ \| \| \|__ M/S 525-3684 Telos \| Being cynical never helps
/___\| \| \| \| ___/ \| \|/__ /\| Pasadena, CA 91109 \| to correct the situation
\|_____\|/ \|_\|/ \|_____\|/ \| and causes more aggravation
\| instead.
NASA Headquarters distributed the following press
release today (4/6). I've typed it in verbatim, for you
folks to chew over. Many of the topics recently
discussed on sci.space are covered in this.
Gibbons Outlines Space Station Redesign Guidance
Dr. John H. Gibbons, Director, Office of Science and
Technology Policy, outlined to the members-designate of
the Advisory Committee on the Redesign of the Space
Station on April 3, three budget options as guidance to
the committee in their deliberations on the redesign of
the space station.
A low option of $5 billion, a mid-range option of $7
billion and a high option of $9 billion will be
considered by the committee. Each option would cover
the total expenditures for space station from fiscal
year 1994 through 1998 and would include funds for
development, operations, utilization, Shuttle
integration, facilities, research operations support,
transition cost and also must include adequate program
reserves to insure program implementation within the
available funds.
Over the next 5 years, $4 billion is reserved within
the NASA budget for the President's new technology
investment. As a result, station options above $7
billion must be accompanied by offsetting reductions in
the rest of the NASA budget. For example, a space
station option of $9 billion would require $2 billion
in offsets from the NASA budget over the next 5 years.
Gibbons presented the information at an organizational
session of the advisory committee. Generally, the
members-designate focused upon administrative topics
and used the session to get acquainted. They also
received a legal and ethics briefing and an orientation
on the process the Station Redesign Team is following
to develop options for the advisory committee to
consider.
Gibbons also announced that the United States and its
international partners -- the Europeans, Japanese, and
Canadians -- have decided, after consultation, to give
"full consideration" to use of Russian assets in the
course of the space station redesign process.
To that end, the Russians will be asked to participate
in the redesign effort on an as-needed consulting
basis, so that the redesign team can make use of their
expertise in assessing the capabilities of MIR and the
possible use of MIR and other Russian capabilities and
systems. The U.S. and international partners hope to
benefit from the expertise of the Russian participants
in assessing Russian systems and technology. The
overall goal of the redesign effort is to develop
options for reducing station costs while preserving key
research and exploration capabilities. Careful
integration of Russian assets could be a key factor in
achieving that goal.
Gibbons reiterated that, "President Clinton is
committed to the redesigned space station and to making
every effort to preserve the science, the technology
and the jobs that the space station program represents.
However, he also is committed to a space station that
is well managed and one that does not consume the
national resources which should be used to invest in
the future of this industry and this nation."
NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin said the Russian
participation will be accomplished through the East-
West Space Science Center at the University of Maryland
under the leadership of Roald Sagdeev.
Claxton hunting first major medal

If they have no place to go, they begin to stall, and force

compression, stealing power from the vehicle (High Drag).

If you squeeze the fuselage, so that these pipes have aplace to bend

into, then drag is reduced.

Essentially, teh cross sectional area of the aircraft shoulf

remain constant for all areas of the fuselage. That is where the wings are

subtract, teh cross sectional area of the wings from the fuselage.

pat

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Pat) writes...

>In article <[email protected]> [email protected] (Ron Baalke) writes:

>|Comet Gehrels 3, which was discovered in 1977, was determined to have

>|been in a temporary Jovian orbit from 1970 to 1973. Comet Shoemaker-Levy 1993e

>|may remain in orbit around Jupiter long enough to allow Galileo to

>|make some closeup observations. The orbital trajectory for Comet

>|Shoemaker-Levy is still being determined.

>a

>What about positional uncertainties in S-L 1993e?

If Comet Shoemaker-Levy 1993e is in Jovian orbit, and if the comet

is still hanging around when Galileo arrives, then I'm sure it will

be added to the list of targets. We'll have by then over two years

of Earth-based observations to help narrow down the positions of the

pieces of the comet. It probably won't be too much different than

what was done with Gaspra.

>But when they were

>imaging toutatis?

Galileo did not image Toutatis. That came from Earth-based radar.

/_ /| /____/ \ /_ /| Ron Baalke | [email protected]

| | | | __ \ /| | | | Jet Propulsion Lab |

___| | | | |__) |/ | | |__ M/S 525-3684 Telos | Being cynical never helps

/___| | | | ___/ | |/__ /| Pasadena, CA 91109 | to correct the situation

|_____|/ |_|/ |_____|/ | and causes more aggravation

| instead.

NASA Headquarters distributed the following press

release today (4/6). I've typed it in verbatim, for you

folks to chew over. Many of the topics recently

discussed on sci.space are covered in this.

Gibbons Outlines Space Station Redesign Guidance

Dr. John H. Gibbons, Director, Office of Science and

Technology Policy, outlined to the members-designate of

the Advisory Committee on the Redesign of the Space

Station on April 3, three budget options as guidance to

the committee in their deliberations on the redesign of

the space station.

A low option of $5 billion, a mid-range option of $7

billion and a high option of $9 billion will be

considered by the committee. Each option would cover

the total expenditures for space station from fiscal

year 1994 through 1998 and would include funds for

development, operations, utilization, Shuttle

integration, facilities, research operations support,

transition cost and also must include adequate program

reserves to insure program implementation within the

available funds.

Over the next 5 years, $4 billion is reserved within

the NASA budget for the President's new technology

investment. As a result, station options above $7

billion must be accompanied by offsetting reductions in

the rest of the NASA budget. For example, a space

station option of $9 billion would require $2 billion

in offsets from the NASA budget over the next 5 years.

Gibbons presented the information at an organizational

session of the advisory committee. Generally, the

members-designate focused upon administrative topics

and used the session to get acquainted. They also

received a legal and ethics briefing and an orientation

on the process the Station Redesign Team is following

to develop options for the advisory committee to

consider.

Gibbons also announced that the United States and its

international partners -- the Europeans, Japanese, and

Canadians -- have decided, after consultation, to give

"full consideration" to use of Russian assets in the

course of the space station redesign process.

To that end, the Russians will be asked to participate

in the redesign effort on an as-needed consulting

basis, so that the redesign team can make use of their

expertise in assessing the capabilities of MIR and the

possible use of MIR and other Russian capabilities and

systems. The U.S. and international partners hope to

benefit from the expertise of the Russian participants

in assessing Russian systems and technology. The

overall goal of the redesign effort is to develop

options for reducing station costs while preserving key

research and exploration capabilities. Careful

integration of Russian assets could be a key factor in

achieving that goal.

Gibbons reiterated that, "President Clinton is

committed to the redesigned space station and to making

every effort to preserve the science, the technology

and the jobs that the space station program represents.

However, he also is committed to a space station that

is well managed and one that does not consume the

national resources which should be used to invest in

the future of this industry and this nation."

NASA Administrator Daniel S. Goldin said the Russian

participation will be accomplished through the East-

West Space Science Center at the University of Maryland

under the leadership of Roald Sagdeev.

Claxton hunting first major medal